2010 product evaluation for reniform nematode suppression

1
2010 Product Evaluation for Reniform Nematode Suppression in Mississippi Delta Sweetpotato Production Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS, SIMRU Stoneville, MS Objective Evaluate five nematicide products for suppression of the reinform nematode species, Rotylenchulus reniformis, in sweetpotatoes, Ipomoea batatas, grown in the Mississippi Delta during the 2010 season. Each product was applied and incorporated into the sweetpotato beds approximately two weeks before transplanting and each treatment was duplicated for three foliar applications of Vydate SL to be applied at fourteen day intervals. Included in this study are yield results of applications of a liquid carbon product, Carbon Boost, and a soil inoculant product, SC 27, applied during transplanting with the nematicide product Nemout. Materials and Methods Research Plot Design Sweetpotato plots were replicated four times with four rows x 25’. Recommended herbicides and nematicide treatments were applied before transplanting. Covington variety sweetpotato slips were transplanted using a two row transplanter at 12” spacing on 5/26/2010. Plots were harvested on 9/15/2010 at 111 days after transplanting. Insect Sampling Sweep Net samples were taken weekly using a 15” sweep net with 100 sweeps at intervals of 25. Insect populations were recorded and treatments applied as needed. Nematicide Treatments Applied on 5/12/10 Untreated Vydate SL @ 128 oz/A 3 weeks before transplanting Telone II @ 6 Gal/A 3 weeks before transplanting K-Pam @ 8 Gal/A 3 weeks before transplanting TRT 1 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervals TRT 2 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervals TRT 3 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervals TRT 4 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervals NemOut @ .6 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with SC27 @ 10 oz NemOut @ .9 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with SC27 @ 10 oz 11) NemOut @ .6 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with Carbon Boost S @ 8 oz/A Carbon Boost S @ 8 oz/A in transplant water Foliar Treatments of Vydate SL @ 64 oz/A 6/14/10 6/28/10 7/12/10 Insecticide Treatments Belt @ 3 oz/ A was applied to all plots on 8/05/10 Herbicide Treatments Valor @ 2.5 oz/A was applied pre-plant to all plots on 5/12/10 Command ME @ 2.66 pts/A plus Dual Magnum @ 10 oz/A was applied on 6/8/2010 Select @ 12 oz/A was applied to all plots on 7/02/10 Soil Sample Dates Pre-Transplant – 4/22/2010, Mid-Season – 7/19/2010 & Pre-Harvest – 9/13/2010 Fertilizer 30 units of ammonium nitrate was applied to all plots on 5/7/2010 Irrigation 6/16/2010, 6/25/2010, 7/15/2010 & 8/05/2010 2010 SeasonalR eniform N em atode C ounts 0 2500 5000 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 U ntrt Vydate Telone II K -Pam U ntrt/Vydate Vydate/Vydate Telone II/Vydate K-Pam/Vydate N em out.6/SC 27 N em out.9/SC 27 N em out.6/C .B oost C.Boost # Reniform Nematodes/Pint of Soil Larry A dam s USDA-ARS,SIM RU Stoneville,MS M id Season C ount Pre-H arvest Count FallThreshold – 5000/Pint Spring Threshold – 2000/Pint 2010 R eniform N em atode Study Y ield 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 U ntrt Vydate Telone II K -Pam U ntrt/Vydate Vydate/Vydate Telone II/Vydate K-Pam/Vydate N em out.6/SC 27 N em out.9/SC 27 N em out.6/C .B oost C.Boost Larry A dam s US D A -AR S,SIM R U Stoneville,MS U S#1 50 Lb.B ushels/A cre 331* ef 510 a 418 bc 379 cdef 375 cdef 479 ab 409 bcd 370 cdef 422 bc 405 bcde 335 def *M eans Follow ed B y The Sam e LetterA re N otSignificantly D ifferent 327 f 2010 R eniform N em atode Study Yield 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 US#2 Jum bo U ntrt Vydate Telone II K -Pam U ntrt/Vydate Vydate/Vydate Telone II/Vydate K-Pam/Vydate N em out.6/SC 27 N em out.9/SC 27 N em out.6/C .B oost C.Boost Larry A dam s USD A-AR S,SIM R U Stoneville,MS CW T N o SignificantD ifference K-Pam Treatm entSignificantly D ifferent 2010 R eniform N em atode Study Yield 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 U ntrt Vydate Telone II K -Pam U ntrt/Vydate Vydate/Vydate Telone II/Vydate K-Pam/Vydate N em out.6/SC 27 N em out.9/SC 27 N em out.6/C .B oost C.Boost Larry A dam s USDA-ARS,SIM RU Stoneville,MS Lbs.TotalYield/Acre *M eans Follow ed B y The Sam e LetterA re N otSignificantly D ifferent c* c ab a bc bc ab abc bc abc c c Summary Growing conditions during the 2010 growing season were optimal. Early planting dates and ideal harvest days produced crops with slightly above average yields across the Mid-South. All treatments were irrigated four times and pesticide applications for insect and weed control were applied as needed throughout the season. The reniform nematode samples pulled during mid-season showed that the treatments Telone II, K-Pam, Telone II/Vydate, K-Pam/Vydate, Nemout .6/SC 27 and Nemout .9/SC 27 were maintaining the population under the spring threshold. The pre-harvest samples showed Telone II, Telone II/Vydate and K-Pam/Vydate continued to suppress the reniform nematode throughout the growing season. A significant yield increase of US#1 sweetpotatoes was recorded in the Telone II, K-Pam, Telone II/Vydate, K-Pam/Vydate and Nemout .9/SC 27 treatments when compared to the untreated control (P = 0.0002). Statistically no significant differences were recorded from the US#2 grade and only the K-Pam treatment showed a significant difference in the Jumbo yield (P = 0.1971). The Telone II, K-Pam and Telone II/Vydate treatments showed a significant difference for total marketable yield (P = 0.0157). Although K-Pam/Vydate and Nemout .9/SC 27 treatments yielded very well for total marketable they were not significantly different from the untreated control. The Nemout .6/SC 27, Nemout .6/Carbon Boost and the Carbon Boost treatments were not significantly different from the untreated control. Acknowledgement We thank Chris Johnson, Owen Houston and Phil Powell, USDA, ARS, SIMRU, for their assistance in field plot preparation and maintenance, Dr. Salliana Stetina, USDA, ARS, CGPRU, Pathologist, for processing soil reniform nematode samples and Debbie Boykin, USDA, ARS, Statistician, for assistance with the statistical analysis of the yield data in this study. Nematicide Treatments Foliar Vydate Treatment Untreated Control

Upload: kacia

Post on 24-Feb-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

2010 Product Evaluation for Reniform Nematode Suppression in Mississippi Delta Sweetpotato Production Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS, SIMRU Stoneville, MS. Objective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2010 Product Evaluation for Reniform Nematode Suppression

2010 Product Evaluation for Reniform Nematode Suppressionin Mississippi Delta Sweetpotato Production

Larry C. Adams and Randall G. LuttrellUSDA-ARS, SIMRU

Stoneville, MS

Objective

Evaluate five nematicide products for suppression of the reinform nematode species, Rotylenchulus reniformis, in sweetpotatoes, Ipomoea batatas, grown in the Mississippi Delta during the 2010 season.Each product was applied and incorporated into the sweetpotato beds approximately two weeks before transplanting and each treatment was duplicated for three foliar applications of Vydate SL to be applied at fourteen day intervals. Included in this study are yield results of applications of a liquid carbon product, Carbon Boost, and a soil inoculant product, SC 27, applied during transplanting with the nematicide product Nemout.

Materials and Methods

Research Plot DesignSweetpotato plots were replicated four times with four rows x 25’. Recommended herbicides

and nematicide treatments were applied before transplanting. Covington variety sweetpotato slips were transplanted using a two row transplanter at 12” spacing on 5/26/2010. Plots were harvested on 9/15/2010 at 111 days after transplanting.

Insect SamplingSweep Net samples were taken weekly using a 15” sweep net with 100 sweeps at intervals of

25. Insect populations were recorded and treatments applied as needed.

Nematicide Treatments Applied on 5/12/10UntreatedVydate SL @ 128 oz/A 3 weeks before transplantingTelone II @ 6 Gal/A 3 weeks before transplantingK-Pam @ 8 Gal/A 3 weeks before transplantingTRT 1 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervalsTRT 2 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervalsTRT 3 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervalsTRT 4 with 3 foliar applications of Vydate SL @ 64oz./A – 14 day intervalsNemOut @ .6 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with SC27 @ 10 oz NemOut @ .9 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with SC27 @ 10 oz 11) NemOut @ .6 lbs/A 3 weeks before transplanting with Carbon Boost S @ 8 oz/ACarbon Boost S @ 8 oz/A in transplant water

Foliar Treatments of Vydate SL @ 64 oz/A6/14/106/28/107/12/10 Insecticide TreatmentsBelt @ 3 oz/ A was applied to all plots on 8/05/10

Herbicide TreatmentsValor @ 2.5 oz/A was applied pre-plant to all plots on 5/12/10Command ME @ 2.66 pts/A plus Dual Magnum @ 10 oz/A was applied on 6/8/2010Select @ 12 oz/A was applied to all plots on 7/02/10

Soil Sample DatesPre-Transplant – 4/22/2010, Mid-Season – 7/19/2010 & Pre-Harvest – 9/13/2010 Fertilizer30 units of ammonium nitrate was applied to all plots on 5/7/2010

Irrigation6/16/2010, 6/25/2010, 7/15/2010 & 8/05/2010

2010 Seasonal Reniform Nematode Counts

0250050007500

1000012500150001750020000225002500027500 Untrt

VydateTelone IIK-PamUntrt/VydateVydate/VydateTelone II/VydateK-Pam/VydateNemout .6/SC 27Nemout .9/SC 27Nemout .6/C. BoostC. Boost

# Ren

iform

Nem

atod

es/P

int o

f Soi

l

Larry AdamsUSDA-ARS, SIMRUStoneville, MS

Mid SeasonCount

Pre-HarvestCount

Fall Threshold – 5000/Pint Spring Threshold – 2000/Pint

2010 Reniform Nematode Study Yield

0

100

200

300

400

500

600 UntrtVydateTelone IIK-PamUntrt/VydateVydate/VydateTelone II/VydateK-Pam/VydateNemout .6/SC 27Nemout .9/SC 27Nemout .6/C. BoostC. Boost

Larry AdamsUSDA-ARS, SIMRUStoneville, MS

US#1 50 Lb. Bushels/Acre

331*ef

510a

418bc

379cdef

375cdef

479ab

409bcd

370cdef

422bc 405

bcde

335def

* Means Followed By The Same Letter Are Not Significantly Different

327f

2010 Reniform Nematode Study Yield

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

US#2 Jumbo

UntrtVydateTelone IIK-PamUntrt/VydateVydate/VydateTelone II/VydateK-Pam/VydateNemout .6/SC 27Nemout .9/SC 27Nemout .6/C. BoostC. Boost

Larry AdamsUSDA-ARS,SIMRUStoneville, MS

CWT

No Significant Difference K-Pam Treatment Significantly Different

2010 Reniform Nematode Study Yield

05000

1000015000200002500030000350004000045000 Untrt

VydateTelone IIK-PamUntrt/VydateVydate/VydateTelone II/VydateK-Pam/VydateNemout .6/SC 27Nemout .9/SC 27Nemout .6/C. BoostC. Boost

Larry AdamsUSDA-ARS, SIMRUStoneville, MS

Lbs. Total Yield/Acre

* Means Followed By The Same Letter Are Not Significantly Different

c* c

aba

bcbc

ab

abc

bc

abc

c c

Summary

Growing conditions during the 2010 growing season were optimal. Early planting dates and ideal harvest days produced crops with slightly above average yields across the Mid-South. All treatments were irrigated four times and pesticide applications for insect and weed control were applied as needed throughout the season. The reniform nematode samples pulled during mid-season showed that the treatments Telone II, K-Pam, Telone II/Vydate, K-Pam/Vydate, Nemout .6/SC 27 and Nemout .9/SC 27 were maintaining the population under the spring threshold. The pre-harvest samples showed Telone II, Telone II/Vydate and K-Pam/Vydate continued to suppress the reniform nematode throughout the growing season. A significant yield increase of US#1 sweetpotatoes was recorded in the Telone II, K-Pam, Telone II/Vydate, K-Pam/Vydate and Nemout .9/SC 27 treatments when compared to the untreated control (P = 0.0002). Statistically no significant differences were recorded from the US#2 grade and only the K-Pam treatment showed a significant difference in the Jumbo yield (P = 0.1971). The Telone II, K-Pam and Telone II/Vydate treatments showed a significant difference for total marketable yield (P = 0.0157). Although K-Pam/Vydate and Nemout .9/SC 27 treatments yielded very well for total marketable they were not significantly different from the untreated control.The Nemout .6/SC 27, Nemout .6/Carbon Boost and the Carbon Boost treatments were not significantly different from the untreated control.

Acknowledgement

We thank Chris Johnson, Owen Houston and Phil Powell, USDA, ARS, SIMRU, for their assistance in field plot preparation and maintenance, Dr. Salliana Stetina, USDA, ARS, CGPRU, Pathologist, for processing soil reniform nematode samples and Debbie Boykin, USDA, ARS, Statistician, for assistance with the statistical analysis of the yield data in this study.

NematicideTreatments

Foliar VydateTreatment

UntreatedControl