2009 tread softly - dreams of elearning

24
Tread softly: making secure steps towards wider adoption of pedagogically-focussed e-learning at Brighton Business School Sue Greener and Asher Rospigliosi University of Brighton [email protected] [email protected]

Upload: sue-greener

Post on 29-May-2015

334 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

ALT-C presentation 2009 with Asher Rospigliosi of Brighton Business School. Tread softly looks at staff adoption of technology in HE.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Back story• Learning and Teaching Fellowship grant, UoB• Three phase project:– Initiation– Support– Feedback

• It grew….

Annual Learning and Teaching Conference  

2009 ConferenceFriday 10th July 2009: From spark to flame

Page 3: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Research enquiry (dream?)

Beginning with the perceived “problem” of adoption of new technologies by academic staff

How do experienced and new academics begin to fit e-learning into their personal pedagogies?

Bringing a psychological and sociological perspective to the problem of adopting TEL - how does this offer us insight into wider technology adoption strategies?

Could we help to enthuse, encourage, support those who were not natural early adopters?

Page 4: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Surfacing initial assumptions• Roger’s model (1962) of innovators, early adopters, early

majority, late majority and laggards – does it help?• Moore (1991) crossing the chasm between early adopters

and the follower groups• Anderson et al (1998), based on Geoghegan (1994) – just

two groups: early adopters (EA) and mainstream faculty (MF)

• Four factors stop us crossing the chasm/gap– Ignorance of the gap– The technologists’ alliance– Alienation of mainstream faculty– Lack of compelling reason to adopt

Page 5: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Where do you place yourself on technology adoption

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 6: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What is your job?

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 7: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What VLE does your institution have?

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 8: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Who do you use TEL with?• CAL (EA)• UofB (MF)

Page 9: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

How long have you used TEL?

• CAL (EA)• UofB (MF)

Page 10: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Why did you take up TEL?

• CAL (EA)• UofB (MF)

Page 11: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Had you used TEL as a learner?

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 12: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What barriers did you face?

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 13: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What support might have helped?

• UofB (MF) • CAL (EA)

Page 14: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Qualitative responses 1

• What surprised them? • EA: – mainly positive • MF: more negative

• What didn’t they like?• EA:• MF:

“how motivating it is when students learning

becomes fun”

“learning moves out of your control”

“colleague inertia”

“It takes hours”

Page 15: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What was familiar about this learning process?

• EA focussed on problems with software, crashes, problem solving

• MF focussed on time taken and related to ease of use

“like learning Word only easier”

Page 16: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

What contradicted your prior beliefs?

• EA tended to find external responses contradicted their prior beliefs:

• MF focussed on personal perceptions which were contradicted:

“technology is a tool not a solution”

“student confidence in using software is always lower than I

expect”

“that it would be complicated and that I would

fail to understand it”“found it more useful and less

scary”

Page 17: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

When asked to reflect on the experience of first using new technology to enhance learning

• EA:

• MF: some were excited about technology, some feeling over-stretched, some more relaxed than they were, found routines difficult to remember, some, as with technologists, focussed on learning not technology.

• No clear distinction with application of hindsight

“it’s much more about pedagogy in my

classroom, not the technology”“regaining

confidence – enjoying learning new skills again”

Page 18: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Problems they faced1. Students’ digital literacy2. Staff resistance3. Technology seen as gimmick4. Lack of time to learn5. Pressure to conform to VLE6. Availability of software, hardware

• No distinction here between two groups• Some saw problems as politically based (institutional strategies,

resourcing)• Few saw problems in making sense of technologies in relation to

learning and teaching• Everyone in study had persisted with using new technologies

Page 19: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Examples of ideas offered for encouraging adoption• Showcases, demonstrations,

workshops/training – show it is relevant and useful to improve experience of teaching and learning for both students and teachers

• Guest speakers in best practice• Contact with experienced colleagues,

buddying, coaching• Sharing student feedback• Shadowing those with experience• Team-working• Focussing on pedagogic gains (student

motivation etc)• Enthusing and encouraging• Time to play (sandpits)• Senior manager commitment• Adopting technologies for peer

assessment and feedback• Using less jargon-ridden language• Relating adoption to promotion/career

paths/staff review• Small project funding• Celebrating achievements,

encouragement of scholarship

• No obvious distinction between our two groups

• Strategies focus on pedagogic beliefs, perceived usefulness, role modelling (how), experimentation, reward, access to resource, promoting awareness, mainstreaming

Page 20: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

A touch more literature

• A more complicated picture than we thought

• Technology Acceptance Model

• Liao and Lu (2008) discuss TAM and alternates and derive “relative advantage” and “compatibility” as drivers to new technologies adoption by teachers

• Compatibility? With beliefs, values, teaching philosophy…..

Page 21: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

So how can we better analyse the different responses of academics in relation to TEL?

Page 22: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

So how can we better analyse the different responses of academics in relation to TEL?• By teaching beliefs? Pedagogies in practice? student,

teaching and content-centred (Greener 2008)• By discipline? Becher and Trowler (1989) work on academic

tribes• By sub-discipline, including hard/soft, urban/rural,

convergent/divergent and pure/applied focus? (Trowler 2009)

• By internet use? Peripherals, normatives, all-rounders and active participants? (Eynon 2009)

• Are Eynon’s “active participants” similar to Drent and Meelissen’s “personal entrepreneurs” (2008)?

• Could other academic groupings be distinguished by skill sets (Deursen & van Dyk 2009)

Page 23: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Which leads us to the future of this project

• New staff engagement – action learning project• Profile analysis of academic staff in HE in relation

to TEL.– digital skillset– degree of digital independence– pedagogic beliefs– openness to sharing and learning

• Practical application: not just focussing on technology adopters/champions .

• We need to tread softly in the mainstream and understand better how to meet their needs.

Page 24: 2009 Tread softly - dreams of elearning

Had I the heaven's embroidered cloths,Enwrought with golden and silver light,The blue and the dim and the dark clothsOf night and light and the half-light,

I would spread the cloths under your feet:But I, being poor, have only my dreams;I have spread my dreams under your feet;Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.

William Butler Yeats