2009 total cohort students = 218,469
DESCRIPTION
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet. Statewide, 74.9% of students who started 9 th grade in 2009 graduated by June 2013, while 15.1% of students were still enrolled. 2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Graduation Rates:Students Who Started 9th Grade
in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009Supplemental Packet
22
IEP Diploma, 1.2%
Still Enrolled, 15.1%
Transferred to GED Program, 0.8%
Dropped Out, 7.8%
Graduated, 74.9%
Statewide, 74.9% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by June 2013, while 15.1% of students were still enrolled.
2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469
All Students in Public Schools
33
IEP Diploma, 1.1%Still Enrolled, 9.1%
Transferred to GED Program, 0.8%
Dropped Out, 6.2%
Graduated, 82.6%
In the districts outside of NYC, 82.6% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by June 2013, while 9.1% of students were still enrolled.
2009 Total Cohort Students = 139,748
All Students in Public Schools outside of NYC
44
Dropped Out7.8%
Transferred to GED Program
0.8%
Still Enrolled12.3%
IEP Diploma1.1%
Graduated77.8%
Statewide, 77.8% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by August 2013, while 12.3% were still enrolled.
2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469
All Students in Public Schools
55
52.4
% 65.9
% 79.2
%
85.7
%
74.9
%
94.1
%
61.3
%
66.0
%
56.6
% 69.5
% 80.7
%
87.2
%
77.8
%94.9
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2009 Cohort through June 2009 Cohort through August
For students who entered 9th grade in 2009, inclusion of August 2013 graduates increased the statewide graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points
compared to the June 2013 rate For this cohort, statewide, 6,236 students earned
diplomas in August 2013.
66
Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents, Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005
2006
2007
14.5% 12.6% 9.8%4.9% 4.9%
17.5% 15.3% 12.2%5.8%
18.4% 16.1% 12.8%
43.7%45.4%
48.8%54.7%
54.2%43.8% 45.5%
49.2% 56.5%43.6% 45.4%
49.2%
41.8%42.0%
41.4% 40.4% 40.9% 38.8% 39.2% 38.6% 37.7%38.1% 38.5% 38.0%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Four Years Five Years Six Years
777
Statewide
78.3
%
79.7
%
73.4
%
79.2
%
80.9
%
80.0
%
81.4
%
74.0
%
79.9
%
74.9
%
71.8
%
74.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma Results Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 224,822
2006 224,744
2007 223,285
2008 221,366
2009 218,469
8
Statewide Achievement Gap Data
99
Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
10% 9% 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 4%
39% 37%36%
45%42% 40%
46%43% 39%
10% 12%
43%
9% 12%
42%
9% 12%
43%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
58.4% 58.1%
85.7%
58.0%
85.1%
57.8%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
59.7% 59.2%
86.5%
1010
Big 4 District graduation rates by credential awarded
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4%
37% 41% 42% 40% 45% 44% 40% 45% 44%
4%
6%
15%
4%
4%
15%
4%
4%
15%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
48.3% 45.9%
61.6%
52.9%
63.5%
50.2%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
48.6%
52.7%
63.8%
1111
Buffalo graduation rates by credential awarded
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
12% 11% 9%5% 4% 4% 7% 5% 3%
35%
23%35%
36%
29%
43% 41%
36%47%
5%
9%
19%
4%
3%
15%
4%
4%
17%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
52.4%
44.1%
62.7%
43.7%
64.0%
35.1%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
51.9%
44.3%
67.4%
1212
Rochester graduation rates by credential awarded
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
10% 11%6% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4%
30% 29% 37%34%
31%36% 35% 32%
35%
4% 5%
15%
5%
4%
18%
4%4%
19%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
43.9% 43.4%
57.8%
43.9%
58.5%
38.1%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
42.1%40.4%
57.8%
1313
Syracuse graduation rates by credential awarded
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
16%9% 11%
7%4% 3%
7%4% 4%
27%
19%
33%36%
35% 38%
39%
33%36%
4%
6%
13%
3%7%
13% 3%
2%
13%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
46.7% 46.4%
53.7%
34.3%
57.1%
45.5%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
49.8%
38.7%
53.3%
1414
Yonkers graduation rates by credential awarded
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
15% 16%11%
6% 4% 5% 4% 4% 7%
34%40%
44%50% 54% 54%
47%
58%58%
7%
9%
22%
4%8%
17%
5%
4%
13%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
2007 2008 2009
56.0%59.3%
75.1%
65.5%
77.6
65.0%
The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years
57.0%
66.1%
77.1%
1515
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Des-ignation
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Des-ignation
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
26
34
0
-7
27
32
1
-6
27
34
-3 -4
27
31
-1-3
28
33
-5
-1
2830
-3
0
27
34
-6
-1
27
31
-4
0
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsFor Black v. White Students and Hispanic v. White Students
Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
1616
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
20
24
1
-5
22 23
3
-4
20
25
-1
-4
22 23
1
-3
20
25
-4
-1
22 23
0 0
20
25
-4
-1
23 23
0 0
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in New York City
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally similar to the statewide trend.
1717
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
14
7
10
-4
19
810
1
1214
0
-3
20
1012
-2
19
12
8
-1
28
1215
1
16
13
6
-3
23
13 12
-2
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Buffalo
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
1818
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
11
14
1
-4
14 14
2
-2
15
11
7
-3
15
11
8
-4
1413
20
20
14
5
1
1615
01
17
14
3
0
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Rochester
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
1919
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
7
11
4
-8
19
11 10
-2
10 10
6
-5
23
8
14
2
7
10
2
-4
86 3
-1
3
9
-3 -3
15
10
4
1
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Syracuse
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
2020
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
Graduation Rate
Regents Adv Desig
Regents Diploma
Local Diploma
22
16
10
-4
1213
4
-5
16
12
4
-1
109
01
1615
01
17
14
3
0
20
7
10
3
11
8
0
3
2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Yonkers
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
2121
NYC Big 4* Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
20
11
14
11
7
11
26
20
15
12
15
10
22
27
20
16
19
14
7
16
28
20
15 16 16
3
20
27
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
Big 4* = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.
2222
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
22
9
19
14
19
8
27
22
11
20
15
23
12
27
22
11
28
20
810
28
23
11
23
1715
11
27
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
2323
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
24
97
1411
9
34
25
13 1411 10
16
34
25
11 12 1310
12
33
25
1113
15
97
34
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and
Statewide
2424
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
23
8 8
14
11
8
32
23
10 10 11
8
13
31
23
9
1214
6
9
30
23
1113 14
108
31
2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4,
and Statewide
2525
ELL
33 3336
4043
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local
Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohort
through June
2626
SWD
30 29 29 2926
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local
Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohort
through June
27
NYC and Big Four City School Districts
282828
New York City
67.8
%
70.9
%
61.0
% 69.4
%
73.2
%
60.9
% 70.2
%
73.0
%
60.4
% 69.5
%
61.3
%
59.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 77,378
2006 78,346
2007 79,476
2008 79,719
2009 78,721
292929
61.7
%
62.6
%
47.4
%
52.1
%
53.0
%
54.0
%
58.0
%
59.1
%
46.8
%
52.5
%
53.4
%
53.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Buffalo
Cohort Membership2005 2,2482006 3,4792007 2,6532008 2,9482009 2,630
Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy, the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
303030
50.6
%
53.6
%
46.1
% 54.7
%
58.0
%
45.5
% 54.0
%
56.2
%
43.4
% 51.7
%
43.0
%
42.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Rochester
Cohort Membership2005 2,9242006 2,6702007 2,8732008 2,5642009 2,399
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
313131
54.2
%
56.3
%
45.9
% 53.9
%
55.9
%
48.4
% 56.4
%
58.1
%
48.0
%
54.2
%
45.2
%
48.8
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Syracuse
Cohort Membership2005 1,5282006 1,5712007 1,6732008 1,5472009 1,552
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
323232
66.7
%
68.0
%
63.2
% 71.2
%
72.2
%
66.2
% 74.4
%
75.9
%
66.0
% 74.8
%
58.1
% 66.4
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Yonkers
Cohort Membership2005 2,0722006 1,6732007 1,8582008 1,8142009 1,857
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
3333
61.0
%
52.8
%
74.0
%
60.4
%
50.0
%
61.3
%
52.4
%
74.9
%
71.8
%
48.2
%56.4
%
73.4
%
49.0
%59.0
%
74.0
%
New York City Large City Districts* Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of NYC’s and Large City Districts’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
* Large City Districts include: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers
3434
60.9
%
54.0
%
45.5
%
48.4
%
66.2
% 74.0
%
60.4
%
46.8
%
48.0
%
66.0
%
61.3
%
53.4
%
43.0
% 48.8
%
66.4
% 74.9
%
59.0
%
53.1
%
42.1
%
45.2
%
58.1
%
71.8
%
61.0
%
47.4
%
46.1
%
45.9
%
63.2
%
73.4
%
43.4
%
74.0
%
New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
3535
60.4
%
46.8
%
48.0
%
47.8
%
48.6
%
51.1
%
72.1
%
76.7
%
61.3
%
53.4
%
43.0
% 48.8
%
66.4
% 74.9
%
66.0
%
56.0
%
48.1
%
51.9
%
72.3
% 77.8
%
66.0
%
43.4
%
74.0
%
64.7
%
New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2008 Cohort 2008 Cohort August 2009 Cohort 2009 Cohort August
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the 2008 and 2009 Cohortsthrough June and August
3636
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2006 2007
14.9%11.1%
4.4% 5.0%
17.8%13.0%
6.0%
18.4%13.5%
29.3%33.5%
36.2%41.0%
31.2%35.5%
40.2%
31.5%36.1%
3.2%9.5%
6.2%
7.4% 3.1%9.5%
6.3%3.2%
9.5%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Four Years Five Years Six Years
46.8%
58.0%53.0%
47.4%
54.0% 52.1%
Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Cohort Membership2006 3,4792007 2,6532008 2,9482009 2,630
53.4% 52.5%
59.1%
3737
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2006 2007
14.4%9.6%
4.1% 3.4%
19.5%13.8%
5.5%
21.5%15.2%
24.9%30.1% 33.2%
34.0% 28.2%34.2%
39.9%29.6%
35.0%6.8% 5.8%
6.1% 5.6%
6.9% 6.0%6.2%
7.0% 6.0%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Four Years Five Years Six Years
43.4%
54.0%
58.0%
46.1% 45.5%
54.7%
Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Cohort Membership2006 2,6702007 2,8732008 2,5642009 2,399
43.0%
51.7%
56.2%
3838
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2006 2007
16.1%13.2%
5.2% 5.5%
22.7%18.1%
6.1%
24.0%18.9%
22.3%27.8%
35.6%37.4% 23.7%
30.6%40.8%
24.2%31.5%
7.5%7.5% 7.2%
5.9%
7.5%7.7%
7.3%7.7%
7.7%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Four Years Five Years Six Years
48.0%
56.4% 55.9%
45.9%48.4%
53.9%
Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Cohort Membership2006 1,5712007 1,6732008 1,5472009 1,552
48.8%
54.2%58.1%
3939
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2006 2007
20.3%14.4%
4.2% 4.4%
26.8%19.0%
4.8%
27.9%
19.6%
34.7%39.3%
53.0%
54.9%
36.1%
42.9%
60.9%
36.1%
43.7%
8.2% 12.4%8.9% 7.1%
8.2% 12.5%9.0%
8.2% 12.5%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Four Years Five Years Six Years
66.0%
74.4%72.2%
63.2%66.2%
71.2%
Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Cohort Membership
2006 1,6732007 1,8582008 1,8142009 1,857
66.4%
74.8% 75.9%
Graduation Rates by Need/Resource Group
For Four, Five and Six Years
4141
New York City
Four Years Five Years Six Years
59.0
% 67.8
%
70.9
%
61.0
% 69.4
%
73.2
%
60.9
% 70.2
%
73.0
%
60.4
% 69.5
%
0.61
32005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 77,3782006 78,3462007 79,4762008 79,7192009 78,721
4242
Large City Districts
Four Years Five Years Six Years
48.2
% 56.7
%
58.6
%
49.0
% 56.5
%
58.3
%
52.8
% 59.8
%
61.5
%
50.0
% 57.1
%
0.52
42005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June
Cohort Membership2005 8,9832006 9,5362007 9,0572008 8,8732009 8,438
4343
High Need Urban-Suburban Districts
Four Years Five Years Six Years
63.0
% 71.7
%
72.9
%
64.5
% 72.0
%
73.6
%
64.5
% 72.3
%
73.8
%
65.1
% 72.8
%
0.65
92005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 16,964 2006 16,666 2007 16,5172008 16,0372009 16,098
4444
High Need Rural Districts
Four Years Five Years Six Years
74.2
%
78.8
%
79.3
%
75.4
%
79.5
%
79.0
%
76.1
%
80.3
%
80.9
%
77.4
%
81.3
%
0.79
22005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 14,7582006 14,2622007 14,1352008 13,5012009 12,734
4545
Average Need Districts
Four Years Five Years Six Years
81.0
%
86.1
%
86.5
%
83.0
%
87.1
%
87.6
%
84.4
%
88.1
%
88.6
%
84.8
%
88.6
%
0.85
7
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 72,3162006 71,2302007 69,5172008 68,0422009 66,534
4646
Low Need Districts
Four Years Five Years Six Years
92.1
%
95.1
%
95.5
%
93.3
%
95.4
%
95.9
%
93.5
%
95.7
%
96.0
%
93.9
%
95.8
%
0.94
12005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 33,6162006 33,6932007 33,4682008 33,5662009 33,729
4747
Districts Outside New York City
Four Years Five Years Six Years
78.6
%
83.8
%
84.5
%
80.1
%
84.4
%
85.1
%
81.2
%
85.4
%
86.1
%
81.6
%
85.8
%
0.82
6 2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership2005 147,4442006 146,3982007 143,8092008 141,6472009 139,748
48
Results for Students by
Race/Ethnicity and Gender
48
49
Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 Cohorts
All Public Schools2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
American Indian / Alaskan Native Female 507 505 570 559 536
American Indian / Alaskan Native Male 473 573 558 577 558
Asian Female 7,757 7,900 8,185 8,735 9,296
Asian Male8,305 8,584 9,129 9,498 9,827
Black Female 22,004 22,369 21,860 21,374 20,667
Black Male 21,833 22,246 22,212 21,608 20,680
Hispanic Female 20,881 21,509 22,374 22,490 22,866
Hispanic Male 21,754 21,840 23,081 23,847 23,777
White Female 58,874 57,465 55,335 54,381 53,237
White Male 62,029 61,279 59,396 57,467 55,964
5050
Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity
American Indian / Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
56.3
%
80.4
%
55.7
%
54.8
%
82.7
%
71.8
%
59.1
%
82.6
%
57.7
%
57.3
%
84.1
%
73.4
%
59.6
%
82.4
%
58.4
%
58.0
%
85.1
%
74.0
%
58.5
%
81.6
%
58.1
%
57.8
%
85.7
%
74.0
%
62.2
%
80.6
%
59.7
%
59.2
%
86.5
%
74.9
%
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four YearsThrough June
5151
Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity
American Indian / Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
62.2
%
80.6
%
59.7
%
59.2
%
86.5
%
74.9
%
65.2
%
83.5
%
64.3
%
63.8
%
87.9
%
77.8
%
2009 Cohort 2009 Cohort Through August
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma in the 2009 Cohort After Four Years Through June and August
5252
IEP Diploma, 1.5%
Still Enrolled, 17.6%
Transferred to GED Program, 2.0%
Dropped Out, 16.5%
Graduated, 62.2%
American Indian Students Who Started 9th Gradein 2009, Results After Four Years
June 2013
2009 Total Cohort Students = 1,094
5353
Asian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2009, Results After Four Years
June 2013
2009 Total Cohort Students = 19,123
Dropped Out, 5.3%
Transferred to GED Program; 0.3%
Still Enrolled; 13.4%
IEP Diploma; 0.4%
Graduated; 80.6%
5454
IEP Diploma, 1.7%
Still Enrolled, 26.0%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0%Dropped Out, 11.3%
Graduated, 59.7%
Black Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2009, Results After Four Years
June 2013
2009 Total Cohort Students = 41,346
5555
IEP Diploma, 1.3%
Still Enrolled, 25.8%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0%
Dropped Out, 12.5%
Graduated, 59.2%
Hispanic Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2009, Results After Four Years
June 2013
2009 Total Cohort Students = 46,642
5656
IEP Diploma, 1.0%
Still Enrolled, 6.7%
Transferred to GED Program, 0.8%
Dropped Out, 4.7%
Graduated, 86.5%
White Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2009, Results After Four Years
June 2013
2009 Total Cohort Students = 109,201
575757
The graduation rate for Black students
65.3
%
68.2
%
57.7
% 66.8
%
70.2
%
58.4
% 68.0
%
70.6
%
58.1
% 67.6
%
59.7
%
55.7
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 43,837
2006 44,615
2007 44,072
2008 42,982
2009 41,346
5858
The Graduation Rate for Black Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007
15.6% 14.1%10.0%
4.4% 4.5%
21.7% 19.5%14.7%
6.1%
23.8% 21.6%16.1%
30.9%34.0%
38.9%44.7%
45.8%
34.3%37.7%
43.6%52.4%
35.1%38.9%
44.8%9.2%
9.5% 9.5% 9.0% 9.4%
9.3% 9.6% 9.7% 9.1% 9.4%9.7% 9.7%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
67.7%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
58.4%
66.8%68.2%
55.7%57.7%
65.3%
The percentage of Black students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 43,837
2006 44,615
2007 44,072
2008 42,982
2009 41,346
58.1%
68.0%70.2%
59.7%
70.6%
595959
The graduation rate for Hispanic students
65.0
%
67.9
%
57.3
% 66.2
%
69.8
%
58.0
% 67.7
%
70.5
%
57.8
% 67.3
%
54.8
%
59.2
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 42,635
2006 43,349
2007 45,455
2008 46,337
2009 46,642
6060
The Graduation Rate for Hispanic Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007
14.8% 12.4%8.8%
3.3% 3.5%
20.7% 17.5%13.2%
4.9%
22.6% 19.4%14.5%
28.8%
33.2%37.3%
42.4%
43.3%
32.8%37.0%
42.4%
50.2%33.8%
38.5%43.9%
11.3%11.7% 11.9% 12.1%
12.4%
11.5% 11.7% 12.1%12.2% 11.5%
11.8% 12.1%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
67.3%
59.2%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
58.0%
66.2% 67.9%
54.8%57.3%
65.0%
The percentage of Hispanic students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 42,635
2006 43,349
2007 45,455
2008 46,337
2009 46,642
57.8%
67.7%69.8%70.5%
6161
Graduation Rate by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
American Indian / Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
61.7
%
85.2
%
61.9
%
60.9
%
86.3
%
76.4
%
64.6
%
87.0
%
64.0
%
63.0
%
87.4
%
77.7
%
62.3
%
86.7
%
64.3
%
63.2
%
88.2
%
78.0
%
62.4
%
85.6
%
63.8
%
62.1
%
88.7
%
77.8
%
67.7
%
84.8
%
65.3
%
63.7
%
89.4
%
78.7
%
50.5
%
76.0
%
49.4
%
49.1
%
79.3
%
67.4
%
54.3
%
78.5
%
51.2
%
51.7
%
81.1
%
69.4
%
56.8
%
78.6
%
52.6
%
53.0
%
82.3
%
70.2
%
54.6
%
78.0
%
52.6
%
53.7
%
82.8
%
70.3
%
56.8
%
76.6
%
54.1
%
54.8
%
83.8
%
71.2
%
Females 2005 Cohort Females 2006 Cohort Females 2007 Cohort Females 2008 Cohort Females 2009 Cohort Males 2005 Cohort Males 2006 Cohort
Males 2007 Cohort Males 2008 Cohort Males 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June
Solid colors: FemalesStripes: Males
6262
Graduation Rate after Four Years by Gender and Race/Ethnicity - All Public Schools
68%
85%
65% 64%
89%
79%
57%
77%
54% 55%
84%
71%
62%
81%
60% 59%
87%
75%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Race/EthGroups
Females Males Females and Males Combined
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June 2013
6363
Graduation Rate after Four Years by Gender and Race/Ethnicity - High Need Districts
62%
59%
81%
55%
55%
67%
66%
66%
77%
78%
70%
85%
62%
59%
81%
50%
49%
72%
42%
50%
61%
56%
57%
69%
61%
56%
77%
50%
50%
73%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C L a r g e C i ti e s
U r b a n /S u b u r b a n
R u r a l H i g h N e e d D i s t r i c t s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
6464
Graduation Rate after Four Years by Gender and Race/Ethnicity - by District Needs Level
62%59%
81% 80% 78%
91% 90% 90%
97%
50% 50%
73%70% 72%
85% 84% 83%
94%
B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June 2013
A v e r a g e N e e d L o w N e e dH i g h N e e d
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
6565
Graduation Rate after Four Years by Gender and Race/Ethnicity - Big 5 Districts
62%
59%
81%
58%
47%
74%
47%
42%
60%
55%
46%
53%
66% 69
%
83%
50%
49%
72%
45%
42%
61%
37% 38%
55%
44%
32%
54%
48%
64%
73%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C B u ff a l o R o c h e s t e r S y r a c u s e Y o n k e r s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
6666
Aspirational Performance Measure (APM) after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - All Public Schools
25%
62%
17%20%
55%
41%
18%
52%
12%16%
46%
34%
21%
57%
14%18%
50%
37%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Race/EthGroups
Females Males Females and Males Combined
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and earned a 75 or greater on their English Regents examination and earned an 80 or greater
on a math Regents examination After Four Years Through June 2013
6767
Aspirational Performance Measure (APM) after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - High Need Districts
16%
17%
47%
6% 7%
22%
14% 16
%
32%
21%
18%
39%
14% 16
%
39%
10% 13
%
39%
4% 5%
17%
11% 15
%
25%
8%
16%
29%
9%
13%
31%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and earned a 75 or greater on their English Regents examination and earned an 80 or greater on a math Regents
examination After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C L a r g e C i ti e s
U r b a n /S u b u r b a n
R u r a l H i g h N e e d D i s t r i c t s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
6868
Aspirational Performance Measure (APM) after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - by District Needs Level
14% 16%
39%
28%31%
54%
41%
47%
74%
45%
9%13%
31%
20%
26%31%
66%
39%
B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and earned a 75 or greater on their English Regents examination and earned an 80 or greater on a
math Regents examination After Four Years Through June 2013
A v e r a g e N e e d L o w N e e dH i g h N e e d
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
6969
Aspirational Performance Measure (APM) after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - Big 5 Districts
16%
17%
47%
9%
5%
29%
3% 4%
24%
4% 5%
13%
9% 9%
18%
10% 13
%
39%
6% 7%
23%
2%
5%
13%
4%
1%
14%
4% 5%
14%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and earned a 75 or greater on their English Regents examination and earned an 80 or greater on
a math Regents examination After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C B u ff a l o R o c h e s t e r S y r a c u s e Y o n k e r s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
7070
Regents Diplomas with Advanced Designationafter Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - All Public Schools
19%
54%
11%14%
48%
34%
14%
45%
8%11%
39%
28%
17%
49%
9%12%
43%
31%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Race/EthGroups
Females Males Females and Males Combined
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who Graduated with a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June 2013
7171
Regents Diplomas with Advanced Designation after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - High Need Districts
8% 10%
35%
5% 4%
18%
10% 14
%
28%
16%
14%
34%
8% 10%
32%
5%
8%
28%
3% 4%
13%
8%
12%
21%
9%
12%
24%
5%
8%
25%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who Graduated with a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C L a r g e C i ti e s
U r b a n /S u b u r b a n
R u r a l H i g h N e e d D i s t r i c t s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
7272
Regents Diplomas with Advanced Designation after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - by District Needs Level
8% 10%
32%
24% 27
%
49%
40%
40%
63%
5%
8%
25%
17% 22
%
39%
29% 31
%
55%
B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June 2013
A v e r a g e N e e d L o w N e e dH i g h N e e d
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
7373
Regents Diplomas with Advanced Designation after Four Years by
Gender and Race/Ethnicity - Big 5 Districts
8% 10%
35%
5% 4%
20%
4% 4%
24%
4% 2%
12%
6% 5%
16%
5%
8%
28%
3% 4%
15%
4% 4%
13%
2% 2%
13%
4% 3%
10%
B H W B H W B H W B H W B H W
Females Males
Percentage of Students in 2009 Total Cohort who graduated with a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June 2013
N Y C B u ff a l o R o c h e s t e r S y r a c u s e Y o n k e r s
B = Black Students, H = Hispanic Students, W = White Students
74
Graduation rates through August 2013 vs. June 2013.
Percentage of Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2009 and Graduated with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years through June and August 2013
AsianAmerican Indian / Alaska Native
HispanicBlack
White
Solid colors: FemalesStripes: Males
Blue – August 2013Red – June 2013
75
Results for
Students with Disabilities
75
7676
Dropped Out; 13.9%
Transferred to GED Program;
1.3%
Still Enrolled; 27.8%
IEP Diploma; 7.8%
Graduated; 48.7%
Unknown; 0.5%
Statewide, 48.7% of students with disabilities who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated as of June 2013,
while 27.8% were still enrolled and 7.8% were awarded IEP diplomas.
2009 Total Cohort Students = 30,808
777777
The graduation rate of students with disabilities
50.4
%
52.7
%
44.1
% 50.1
%
53.3
%
44.6
% 52.1
%
54.6
%
44.7
% 52.7
%
48.7
%
42.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 32,058
2006 32,696
2007 32,917
2008 33,833
2009 30,808
7878
The Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007
20.0% 20.8% 20.2% 18.9% 20.9%26.1% 25.6% 25.6% 24.1%
27.8% 27.9% 27.3%
19.1%20.2% 21.3%
22.8%24.7% 21.2%
21.4% 23.2%
25.4%
21.7%22.2%
24.0%3.0%
3.1% 3.1% 3.0%
3.1%3.2% 3.1%
3.2% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2%3.3%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
54.6%
48.7%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
44.6%
50.1%52.7%
42.1%44.1%
50.4%
The percentage of cohort members who are Students with Disabilities earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 32,058
2006 32,696
2007 32,917
2008 33,833
2009 30,808
44.7%
52.1%53.3%52.7%
7979
23.0
%
36.9
%
38.8
%
53.0
%
42.1
%
45.6
%
48.7
%
73.8
%
24.7
%27
.9%
25.0
%
39.4
%
40.7
%
55.8
%
44.1
%
75.3
%
27.2
%
28.2
%
39.0
% 46.2
%
57.0
%
75.6
%
44.6
%
27.6
%
25.8
%
40.4
% 46.2
%
58.8
%
74.8
%
44.7
%
59.5
%
29.9
%
33.2
% 42.8
%
77.3
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June
Four-year graduation rates for students with disabilities by Need/Resource
Capacity
80
Results for English Language Learners
80
8181
IEP Diploma, 2.3%
Still Enrolled, 43.2%
Transferred to GED Program, 0.7%
Dropped Out, 22.1%
Graduated, 31.4%
Statewide, 31.4% of ELL students who started 9th grade in 2009 had graduated as of June 2013, while 43.2% were still enrolled and 22.1% had
dropped out.
2009 Total Cohort Students = 12,277
828282
The graduation rate for ELL students
51.7
% 55.5
%
51.7
% 56.7
%
38.2
%
51.6
%
55.2
%
34.3
%
45.8
%
31.4
%38.6
%
40.3
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort2009 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2005 11,265
2006 11,635
2007 12,236
2008 11,986
2009 12,277
8383
The Graduation Rate for English Language Learners
16.9%14.1%
10.3%
3.5% 3.2%
25.5%
17.2%
5.5%
28.2%
5.9%6.1%
5.2%
5.6%5.5%
6.6% 6.5% 5.7%
6.1%
6.7% 6.7% 5.7%
19.0%24.4%
21.4%
34.3%
28.7%23.8%
19.6%
22.7%25.2%
22.8%20.2%15.9%
30.5%25.6%20.6%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
Four Years Five Years Six Years
38.2%
51.7%
55.5%
38.6%40.3%
51.7%
The percentage of English Language Learner cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 11,265
2006 11,635
2007 12,236
2008 11,986
2009 12,277
34.3%
51.6%
56.7%
31.4%
45.8%
55.2%
8484
35% 38
.8%
35.2
%
31.4
%39%
35%
30%
30%
52%
40% 41.5
%
24.3
%
34.4
% 40.3
%
36.9
%
40.3
%
55.8
%
39.4
%
26.2
% 30.4
% 34.5
%
38.6
%
53.5
%
38.2
%
35.4
%
20.7
% 28.9
%
26.8
% 35.0
%
47.7
%
34.3
%
21.6
%
32.3
%
23.9
%
45.2
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Graduation Rates for ELL Students
85
Graduation rates of ELLs compared to non-ELLs. Percentage of students who started 9th grade in 2009 who graduated by June 2013
Current ELLs Non ELLs One time ELLs (excl. current)
31%
78%71%
2009 Cohort MembershipCurrent English Language Learners: 12,277Non-English Language Learners : 206,192
One time ELLs (excl. current): 10,348
86
Credentials EarnedBy Those Who Graduated:
Regents Diplomas vs.
Local Diplomas
86
8787
2009Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June 2013 By Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender.
Credentials Earned by Students Who GraduatedNote: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
All Students
American Indian /
Alaska Na-tive Female
American Indian /
Alaska Na-tive Male
Asian Female
Asian Male Black Female
Black Male Hispanic Female
Hispanic Male
White Female
White Male
9.1% 8.2% 0.9% 1.4% 5.9% 9.4% 5.0% 6.9% 3.8% 5.2%
62.5% 67.5%
35.4% 39.6%
76.8% 76.6%73.2% 73.0%
42.6%48.4%
28.4% 24.3%
63.6% 58.9%
17.3% 13.9%21.8% 20.1%
53.5% 46.4%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
363 317 7,884 7,524 13,492 11,190 14,561 13,033 47,617 46,882Graduate Count:
8888
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
American Indian/ Alaska Native Students and All Students
19.2%15.3% 16.1%5.4% 9.1%
19.2% 17.7%14.5%8.3% 8.2%
14.7% 12.6%5.8%
55.0%55.2% 59.2%
71.3%62.5%
61.1%58.2%60.6% 72.1% 67.5%
42.1% 43.9%47.3% 53.6% 52.9%45.4% 46.9% 50.5%55.9% 55.7%
25.9%29.4% 24.8% 23.2% 19.7% 24.3%
43.2% 43.5%43.3% 42.4% 43.0%40.3% 40.5% 39.4%38.3% 38.6%
5.7%9.4% 4.0% 4.1%
14.3% 10.2%12.6%
24.9%24.1%28.4%
19.7%
AI/AN Female 2005
AI/AN Female 2006
AI/AN Female 2007
AI/AN Female 2008
AI/AN Female 2009
AI/AN Male 2005
AI/AN Male 2006
AI/AN Male 2007
AI/AN Male 2008
AI/AN Male 2009
All Female 2005
All Female 2006
All Female 2007
All Female 2008
All Female 2009
All Males 2005
All Male 2006
All Male 2007
All Male 2008
All Male 2009
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma w ith Advanced Designation
8989
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Asian Students and All Students
Asian Females 2005
Asian Females 2006
Asian Females 2007
Asian Females 2008
Asian Females 2009
Asian Males 2005
Asian Males 2006
Asian Males 2007
Asian Males 2008
Asian Males 2009
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Females 2009
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
All Males 2009
8.4% 6.1% 4.6% 0.9% 0.9% 9.0% 6.5% 5.2% 1.6% 1.4%14.7%12.6% 9.4%
4.0% 4.1%14.3%12.6%10.2% 5.8% 5.7%
28.6%31.0%31.2%35.7%35.4%
31.7%33.4%36.7%39.7%39.6%
42.1%43.9%47.3%53.6%52.9%
45.4%46.9%50.5%55.9%55.7%
63.0%62.9%64.3%63.4%63.6%59.3%60.1%58.1%58.6%58.9%
43.2%43.5%43.3%42.4%43.0%40.3%40.5%39.4%38.3%38.6%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9090
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Black Students and All Students
Black Females 2005
Black Females 2006
Black Females 2007
Black Females 2008
Black Females 2009
Black Males 2005
Black Males 2006
Black Males 2007
Black Males 2008
Black Males 2009
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Females 2009
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
All Males 2009
27.2% 23.5%15.9%
5.9% 5.9%
29.1% 25.6%18.5%
9.6% 9.4%14.7% 12.6% 9.4%
4.0% 4.1%14.3% 12.6% 10.2% 5.8% 5.7%
55.4% 58.0%66.1%
76.5% 76.8%
55.5% 60.3%67.2%
77.5% 76.6%
42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6% 52.9%
45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9% 55.7%
17.5% 18.4% 18.0% 17.6% 17.3% 15.4% 14.1% 14.3% 12.9% 13.9%
43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 43.0% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3% 38.6%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9191
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Hispanic Students and All Students
Hispanic Females 2005
Hispanic Females 2006
Hispanic Females 2007
Hispanic Females 2008
Hispanic Females 2009
Hispanic Males 2005
Hispanic Males 2006
Hispanic Males 2007
Hispanic Males 2008
Hispanic Males 2009
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Females 2009
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
All Males 2009
27.9%22.1%
14.6%4.5% 5.0%
25.8% 21.2%15.7%
7.1% 6.9%14.7% 12.6% 9.4%
4.0% 4.1%14.3% 12.6% 10.2% 5.8% 5.7%
51.6%57.7%
64.0%73.9% 73.2%
53.5% 58.2% 64.7%72.8% 73.0%
42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6% 52.9%45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9% 55.7%
20.5% 20.2% 21.4% 21.6% 21.8% 20.8% 20.5% 19.6% 20.0% 20.1%
43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 43.0% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3% 38.6%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9292
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
White Students and All Students
White Females 2005
White Females 2006
White Females 2007
White Females 2008
White Females 2009
White Males 2005
White Males 2006
White Males 2007
White Males 2008
White Males 2009
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Females 2009
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
All Males 2009
8.8% 7.8% 6.6% 3.8% 3.8% 9.2% 8.5% 7.5% 5.1% 5.2%14.7% 12.6% 9.4%
4.0% 4.1%14.3% 12.6% 10.2% 5.8% 5.7%
37.8% 37.9% 39.3% 43.8% 42.6%43.1% 43.0% 44.9% 48.7% 48.4%
42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6% 52.9%
45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9% 55.7%
53.3% 54.4% 54.1% 52.4% 53.5%47.7% 48.5% 47.6% 46.2% 46.4% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 43.0% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3% 38.6%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9393
Diplomas Awarded to Students with Disabilities of Total Diplomas Awarded 2005-2009 Cohorts
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
Students with
Disabili-ties 2005
Students with
Disabili-ties 2006
Students with
Disabili-ties 2007
Students with
Disabili-ties 2008
Students with
Disabili-ties 2009
All Stu-dents
2005
All Stu-dents 2006
All Stu-dents 2007
All Stu-dents 2008
All Stu-dents 2009
47.5% 47.2% 45.2% 42.3% 42.9%
14.5% 12.6% 9.8% 4.9% 4.9%
45.3% 45.8% 47.8% 51.1% 50.8%
43.7% 45.4% 48.8% 54.7% 54.2%
7.2% 7.0% 7.0% 6.6% 6.3%
41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4% 40.9%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9494
English Language Learners by Diploma Type of Total Diplomas Awarded 2009 Cohort
Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
ELL Non-ELL All Students
10.2%4.8% 4.9%
72.3%
53.8% 54.2%
17.6%
41.4% 40.9%
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
9595
33%
52%
64%
74%
61%
73.0
% 81.4
%
71.2
%
85%
45% 49
.2%
33.2
%
53.3
%
65.4
%
76.6
%
64.2
%
87.0
%
53.0
%
41.1
%
56.3
%
67.0
%
78.7
% 87.4
%
66.8
%
57.7
%
45.6
%
60.6
%
71.1
%
80.7
%
90.9
%
70.4
%
58.4
%
48.0
%
61.5
%
91.3
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced
Designation after 4 Years by Need Resource Group Through June
9696
7%
17%
17%
30%
22%
18.5
%
34.7
%
51%
9%11
.1%
7.7%
16.7
%
18.4
%
31.4
%
23.3
%
51.6
%
12.4
%
9.4%
17.6
%
19.9
%
32.6
%
53.4
%
24.4
%
14.1
%
7.8%
18.6
%
20.5
%
35.2
%
55.4
%
25.8
%
16.7
%
10.1
%
27.8
%
19.3
%
58.4
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Students with Disabilities Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
9797
13%
19% 22
%
23%
22%
19.9
%
30.4
% 36%
22% 26
.9%
10.8
%
22.8
%
22.5
%
25.8
%
26.3
%
41.1
%
29.3
%
15.4
% 21.3
%
19.0
%
27.2
%
37.1
%
27.9
%32.0
%
18.8
% 25.6
%
23.2
% 28.6
%
45.1
%
30.9
%28
.2%34
.3%
29.1
%
20.5
%
41.6
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort English Language Learners Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
9898
73.4
%
40.1
%
40.1
%
75.3
%
56.8
%
79.6
%
55.7
%
82.7
%
61.4
%
45.5
% 49.4
%
77.4
%
43.5
%
44.9
%
77.3
%
64.2
%
50.4
%
78.4
%
48.4
%
49.3
%
79.1
%
66.8
%
54.5
%
80.6
%
53.7
%
54.5
%
81.9
%
70.4
%
55.2
%
71.2
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Students by Racial/Ethnic Group Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced
Designation After Four Years Through June
9999
40.8
% 45.5
%
65.2
%
57.8
%
61.6
%
52.2
%
75.5
%
67.2
%
48.8
%
61.4
%64
.2%
60.6
%67.9
%
49.4
%
44.7
%49.9
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
50.4
%
48.6
%54.7
%
70.4
%
66.3
%74.7
%
54.5
%
50.1
%59.0
%
71.2
%
56.8
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Female
American Indian /Alaska Native Male
American Indian /Alaska Native Total
All Female All Male All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort American Indian/Alaska Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
100100
69.1
% 73.4
%
65.2
%
57.8
%
84.0
%
75.5
%
75.5
%
67.2
%
78.0
%
61.4
%64
.2%
60.6
%67.9
%
77.4
%
74.3
%81.7
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%78.4
%
74.6
%
82.7
%
70.4
%
66.3
%74.7
%80.6
%
76.7
%84.8
%
71.2
%
79.6
%
Asian Female Asian Male Asian Total All Female All Male All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Asian Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
101101
35.0
% 40.1
%
65.2
%
57.8
%
61.4
%
49.0
%
45.1
%
61.4
%64
.2%
60.6
%67.9
%
43.5
%
38.1
%
49.0
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
48.4
%
42.8
%
54.1
%
70.4
%
66.3
%
74.7
%
53.7
%
47.5
%
60.0
% 67.2
%
75.5
%
71.2
%
55.2
%
Black Female Black Male Black Total All Female All Male All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Total 2008 Total 2009 Total
Percentage of Total Cohort Black Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through
June
102102
36.4
%
40.1
%
65.2
%
57.8
%
60.5
%
51.0
%
75.5
%
67.2
%
43.9
%
61.4
%64
.2%
60.6
%67.9
%
44.9
%
40.7
%
49.0
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
49.3
%
44.7
%
54.0
%
70.4
%
66.3
%
74.7
%
54.5
%
49.9
%
59.3
%
71.2
%
55.7
%
Hispanic Female Hispanic Male Hispanic Total All Female All Male All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Hispanic Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
103103
72.0
%
75.3
%
65.2
%
57.8
%
86.0
%
79.4
%
75.5
%
67.2
%
78.7
%
61.4
%64
.2%
60.6
%67.9
%
77.3
%
74.2
%80.6
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
79.1
%
76.1
%82.3
%
70.4
%
66.3
%
74.7
%81.9
%
78.6
%85.4
%
71.2
%
82.7
%
White Female White Male White Total All Female All Male All Students
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 2009 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort White Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
Revised Cohort Definitions• Revised cohort definitions were applied to district and school
cohorts (including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and Yonkers) beginning in the 2010-11 school year for the 4 and 5 year cohorts (2007 and 2006 cohorts, respectively). This definition includes in the cohort any student enrolled in a school or district for one day or longer. Previously, a student need be enrolled for five months or longer to be included in the cohort. The 2011-12 and 2012-13 school year results use these the revised cohort definitions for all cohorts (4, 5, and 6 year).
104
105
Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) were calculated based on the total number of students in the 2009, 2008 and 2007 cohorts as of June 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively (including students who dropped out or transferred to an approved GED program).
Graduation rate is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma.
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation requires 22 units of credit, passing 7 to 9 Regents examinations with 65 or above, and advanced course sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts.
ELA/Math APM is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and scored*:• 75 or higher on the English Regents examination, and• 80 or higher on a mathematics Regents examination* Or who achieved the minimum score accepted by the Department on an approved alternative to a Regents examination (see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/apda/hsgen/archive/list.pdf).
Aspirational Performance Measures - Definitions
106
Mathematics Regents ExaminationsImplementation / Transition Timeline
Approved by the Board of Regents 12/8/05
Mathematics A
Mathematics B Algebra Geometry Algebra 2/
Trigonometry
2006-07 X X
2007-08 X X
XFirst admin. in
June 2008
2008-09X
Last admin. in January 2009
X X
XFirst admin. in
June 2009
2009-10X
Last admin. in June 2010
X XX
First admin. in June 2010
2010-11 X X X
2011-12 X X X .
107
Local Diploma Phase-Out* TimelineRequirements for Students Entering Grade 9 in:
September 2002-04
September2005
September2006
September2007
September2008
September2009
September2010
September2011
Regents Examination score of 65+
0 2 3 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
& Regents Examination score of 55-64
1-5 3 2 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Or, for students with disabilities:
Regents Examination score of 55-64
1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5
Regents Competency
Tests1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 N/A
.
* The local diploma option remains for general education students who pass three Regents examinations with a score of 65 or above and two Regents examinations through an appeals process. In addition, students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 in September 2005 or later and earn a Regents examination score between 55 and 64 continue to be eligible for a local diploma. Students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 no later than the 2010-11 school year, but fail any of the five required Regents examinations, may earn a local diploma by passing the corresponding Regents Competency Test.
108
Graduation Rate Release:2009 Cohort through June/August 2013
Students excluded from a school/district cohort:•Transferred to a different New York public school, nonpublic school, or a school outside New York•Transferred to home-schooling•Transferred to a postsecondary school prior to earning a diploma•Transferred outside district by court order to a program that provide access to a regular high school diploma•Left the United States•Deceased
109
Graduation Rate Release:2009 Cohort through June/August 2013
•Graduation Rate equals the number of students in the 2009 cohort who earned a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma divided by the total number of students in the 2009 cohort
•Students who earn GED or IEP diplomas cannot be included as graduates for graduation rate reporting purposes*
* See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf
110
Required Documentation for Removal from the Cohort
Transfer:•Written request for a transcript from the receiving school, a record of sending a transcript to the receiving school, written acknowledgement from the receiving school that the student has registered, written notice of the intent to instruct at home, copy of post-secondary admission notification and schedule of courses taken, or a copy of the court order placing student out of district.
Left the United States:•Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the student’s parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator includes in the student’s file.
See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf