2005 preliminary summer spill data fall chinook radiotelemetry studies performed by usgs – brd,...

2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data

Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Performed byPerformed by

USGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSCUSGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSCFor the USACEFor the USACE

Anadromous Fish Evaluation ProgramAnadromous Fish Evaluation Program

Important ConsiderationsImportant Considerations

These estimates do not address adult return issues nor These estimates do not address adult return issues nor transport vs. in-river survivaltransport vs. in-river survival

This information is very preliminary and the specific This information is very preliminary and the specific numbers are likely to changenumbers are likely to change

This is the first look at subyearling passage at most of the This is the first look at subyearling passage at most of the projects including RSW’sprojects including RSW’s

The survival estimates are relative survival estimates The survival estimates are relative survival estimates compared to a tailrace referencecompared to a tailrace reference

Lower GraniteLower GraniteBackground InformationBackground Information

StudyStudy Radio Telemetry – Paired Release (2200 fish released)Radio Telemetry – Paired Release (2200 fish released) June 20 – July 22June 20 – July 22

OperationsOperations RSW on Total Avg Q RSW on Total Avg Q = 41kcfs= 41kcfs RSW on Spill Avg Q RSW on Spill Avg Q = 18.5kcfs (46.7%)= 18.5kcfs (46.7%) RSW off Total Q RSW off Total Q = 43.4kcfs= 43.4kcfs RSW off Spill Avg Q RSW off Spill Avg Q = 30.5kcfs (69.6%)= 30.5kcfs (69.6%)

% of fish% of fish passing a dam passing a dam

via a specificvia a specific routeroute

% of Fish% of Fish PassingPassing

a dam via a dam via an RSWan RSW

Passage MetricsPassage Metrics Survival MetricsSurvival Metrics

% of fish% of fish surviving a damsurviving a dam

or specificor specific dam passagedam passage

routeroute

% of fish% of fish surviving RSWsurviving RSW

passagepassagerouteroute

LegendLegend

Passage RoutePassage Route

Lower Granite DamLower Granite DamSummer Non-RSW OperationsSummer Non-RSW Operations

SpillSpillSurvivalSurvival

90.2%90.2%

SpillSpillPassagePassage

94%94%

BypassBypassPassagePassage

4%4%

TurbineTurbinePassagePassage

2%2%

DamDamSurvivalSurvival

89.5%89.5%

Bypass not included

Summer RSW OperationsSummer RSW Operations

Lower Granite DamLower Granite Dam

TrainingTraining18.5%18.5%

RSWRSW68%68%

Spill Spill PassagePassage

86.5%86.5% TurbineTurbinePassagePassage

2.5%2.5%


11%11%

DamDamSurvivalSurvival93.9%93.9%

RSWRSWSurvivalSurvival94.5%94.5%

Bypass not included

Little GooseLittle GooseBackground InformationBackground Information

StudyStudy Radio Telemetry – Single ReleaseRadio Telemetry – Single Release Used the ~2000 fish released at LGRUsed the ~2000 fish released at LGR June 21 – July 28June 21 – July 28

OperationsOperations Total Avg Q Total Avg Q = 39.6kcfs= 39.6kcfs Spill Avg Q Spill Avg Q = 17.9kcfs (44%)*= 17.9kcfs (44%)*

– Spill changed during the study due to adult passage issuesSpill changed during the study due to adult passage issues Spill limited to 30% daytimeSpill limited to 30% daytime

Little Goose DamLittle Goose DamSummer Non-RSW OperationsSummer Non-RSW Operations


92%92%


84%84%


13%13%


3%3%


Bypass not included

Lower MonumentalLower MonumentalBackground InformationBackground Information

StudyStudy Radio Telemetry and PIT – Paired ReleaseRadio Telemetry and PIT – Paired Release Approximately 2200 fish releasedApproximately 2200 fish released *July 6 – July 16*July 6 – July 16

OperationsOperations Total Avg Q Total Avg Q = 36kcfs= 36kcfs Spill Avg Q Spill Avg Q = 21kcfs (59%)= 21kcfs (59%)

Lower Monumental Dam *Lower Monumental Dam *Summer Non-RSW OperationsSummer Non-RSW Operations

SpillSpillSurvivalSurvival90.5%90.5%


DamDam + Forebay+ Forebay

SurvivalSurvival72.2%72.2%


2%2%


8%8%

SpillwaySpillwayPassagePassage

88%88%

Ice HarborIce HarborBackground InformationBackground Information

StudyStudy Radio Telemetry and PIT – Paired ReleaseRadio Telemetry and PIT – Paired Release Approximately 4200 fish releasedApproximately 4200 fish released June 10 – July 1June 10 – July 1

OperationsOperations RSW on Total Avg Q RSW on Total Avg Q = 50kcfs= 50kcfs RSW on Spill Avg Q RSW on Spill Avg Q = 23kcfs (46%)= 23kcfs (46%) RSW off Total Avg Q RSW off Total Avg Q = 49kcfs= 49kcfs RSW off Spill Avg Q RSW off Spill Avg Q = 41kcfs (84%)= 41kcfs (84%)

Ice Harbor DamIce Harbor DamSummer Non-RSW OperationsSummer Non-RSW Operations


1%1%


1%1%

SpillwaySpillwayPassagePassage

98%98%





Ice Harbor DamIce Harbor Dam

Summer RSW OperationsSummer RSW Operations

RSWRSW60%60%

TrainingTraining27%27%


87%87%


5%5%BypassBypassPassagePassage

8%8%





TrainingTrainingSurvivalSurvival95.9%95.9%

RSWRSWSurvivalSurvival99.4%99.4%

McNaryMcNaryBackground InformationBackground Information

StudyStudy Radio Telemetry - Paired ReleaseRadio Telemetry - Paired Release Approximately 2700 fish releasedApproximately 2700 fish released June 22 – July 31June 22 – July 31

OperationsOperations Total Avg Q Total Avg Q = 171kcfs= 171kcfs Spill Avg Q Spill Avg Q = 104kcfs (60%)= 104kcfs (60%)

McNary DamMcNary DamSummer RSW OperationsSummer RSW Operations


64%64%


19%19%


17%17%



102%102%

BypassBypassSurvivalSurvival

86%86%

TurbineTurbineSurvivalSurvival

86%86%

Key TakeawaysKey Takeaways

The results suggest generally high subyearling The results suggest generally high subyearling survival through the projectssurvival through the projects

Fish Passage Efficiency (FPE, the percent of fish Fish Passage Efficiency (FPE, the percent of fish passing via non-turbine routes) at all projects was passing via non-turbine routes) at all projects was relatively high ranging from 81 to 100%. relatively high ranging from 81 to 100%.

Spill Effectiveness (percent of fish passing through Spill Effectiveness (percent of fish passing through the spillway divided by the percent of water the spillway divided by the percent of water passing through the spillway) was higher than we passing through the spillway) was higher than we anticipated for Snake River Projects and was 2-3 anticipated for Snake River Projects and was 2-3 times higher for RSW’s than spillways. times higher for RSW’s than spillways.

RSW OperationsRSW Operations Non-RSW OperationsNon-RSW Operations

Passage Passage %%

CI CI Passage Passage %%

CI CI

McNaryMcNary

SpillSpill 63.8%63.8% (61.0-66.6)(61.0-66.6)

TurbineTurbine 18.8%18.8% (16.3-21.3)(16.3-21.3)

BypassBypass 17.4%17.4% (15.5-19.5)(15.5-19.5)

FGEFGE 48.2%48.2% (43.5-53.0)(43.5-53.0)

FPEFPE 81.2%81.2% (78.7-83.7)(78.7-83.7)

Spill Spill EffectEffect

1.061.06

Ice Ice HarborHarbor

SpillSpill 8787 9898

TurbineTurbine 55 11

BypassBypass 88 11

RSWRSW 6060 --

FGEFGE 61.561.5 (46.4-(46.4-76.7)76.7)

62.562.5 (24-101.1)(24-101.1)

FPEFPE 95.295.2 (88.8-(88.8-101.6)101.6)

99.699.6 (98.6-100.5)(98.6-100.5)

RSW RSW Effect.Effect.

3.43.4 --

Spill Spill Effect.Effect.

1.91.9 1.171.17 (1.12-1.23)(1.12-1.23)

Lower Lower Mon*Mon*

SpillSpill 8888

TurbineTurbine 22

BypassBypass 88

FGEFGE 8080

FPEFPE 9696

Spill Spill EffectEffect

1.491.49

Passage Metrics


Passage Passage %%

CI CI Passage Passage %%

CI CI

Little GooseLittle Goose

SpillSpill 84%84% (2.4)(2.4)

TurbineTurbine 2.7%2.7% (1.0)(1.0)

BypassBypass 13.3%13.3% (2.2)(2.2)

FGEFGE 82.9%82.9% (7.2)(7.2)

FPEFPE 97.3%97.3% (1.0)(1.0)

Spill Effect.Spill Effect. 1.91.9

Lower Lower GraniteGranite

SpillSpill 18.518.5 (4.2)(4.2) 93.993.9 (2.6)(2.6)

TurbineTurbine 2.52.5 (1.6)(1.6) 22 (1.6)(1.6)

BypassBypass 11.211.2 (3.4)(3.4) 44 (2.1)(2.1)

RSWRSW 67.767.7 (5.0)(5.0) -- --

FGEFGE 81.681.6 (11.2)(11.2) 66.766.7 (21)(21)

FPEFPE 97.597.5 (1.6)(1.6) 9898 1.61.6

RSW Effect.RSW Effect. 3.963.96

Spill Effect.Spill Effect. 1.351.35

Passage Metrics


Survival Survival %%

CI CI Survival Survival %%

CI CI

McNaryMcNary DamDam 96.396.3 93.5-99.293.5-99.2

SpillwaySpillway 102102 99.2-104.699.2-104.6

TurbineTurbine 86.486.4 78.5-93.578.5-93.5

bypassbypass 86.586.5 80.5-92.080.5-92.0

Ice Ice HarborHarbor

Dam+FoDam+Forere

92.992.9 90.0-95.990.0-95.9 95.195.1 92.4-97.892.4-97.8

DamDam 9898 95.3-95.3-100.7100.7

99.699.6 97.1-102.197.1-102.1

SpillwaySpillway 98.398.3 95.5-95.5-101.1101.1

99.899.8 97.3-102.297.3-102.2

RSWRSW 99.499.4 96.3-96.3-102.4102.4

TrainingTraining 95.995.9 90.2-90.2-100.5100.5

JBSJBS 98.898.8 91.6-91.6-106.1106.1

Lower Lower MonMon

Dam+ Dam+ ForeFore

72.272.2 66.8-7866.8-78

DamDam 86.286.2 75.2-98.875.2-98.8

SpillwaySpillway 90.590.5 76-107.776-107.7

Little Little GooseGoose

SpillwaySpillway 9292 4.64.6

DamDam 91.691.6 4.44.4

Lower Lower GranGran

DamDam 93.993.9 10.610.6 89.589.5 9.99.9

SpillSpill 90.290.2 7.57.5

RSWRSW 94.594.5 5.55.5

Relative SurvivalEstimates

2005 preliminary summer spill data fall chinook radiotelemetry studies performed by usgs – brd,...

Documents

kcfs rsw

kcfs spill avg q

operations total avg

fish surviving rsw

total q

lower monumental dam

daytime slide

tailrace reference slide