2 nd rasm workshop 2012 spring
DESCRIPTION
2 nd RASM Workshop 2012 Spring. Brandon J. Fisel Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences Monterey, CA 14-18 May. overview. Sea ice – atmosphere interactions recent, rapid sea-ice decline Model circulation regimes exist Goal sea-ice area changes - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2nd RASM Workshop2012 Spring
Brandon J. FiselIowa State University
Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences
Monterey, CA 14-18 May
OVERVIEW
2nd RASM May 2012
Sea ice – atmosphere interactions recent, rapid sea-ice decline
Model circulation regimes exist Goal
sea-ice area changes affects persistent circulation regimes implications for predictability of future
atmospheric circulation seasonal T extremes
METHODOLOGY
2nd RASM May 2012
WRF-ARW 3.1 CORDEX domain
50 km resolution
Analysis region
METHODOLOGY (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
ECMWF (ERA-Interim); 6-hr SST and sea ice; prescribed; 12-hr
1 Ensemble; 16 members June – December, 2007 1 or 2 regimes Model-based clustering
model selection; BIC model fit; penalty for model
complexity Time windows
> synoptic time frame; 7 & 11 days
METHODOLOGY (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
Seasonal T extremes JJA and OND; 1st and 99th percentile regions; ANC, AS1 and SC land points only
ANCAS1SC
REGIMES
2nd RASM May 2012
2 regimes; differing trends
2 regimes; significantlyseparated
1 regime
REGIMES (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
significantly separated
a) high MSLPb) low MSLP
differingtrends
c) high MSLPd) low MSLP
REGIMES (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
Model variabilityMonth 75th – 25th [hPa]June(15-30) 6.1July 4.9August 8.1September 5.7October 10.1November 9.0December 9.8
< 8 hPa
> 8 hPa
REGIMES (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
Month 7-Day 11-DayJune(15-30) 93% 100%July 71% 87%August 84% 97%September 33% 30%October 74% 94%November 63% 83%December 96% 100%
BIC2 > BIC1
REGIMES (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
Regime streaks
JJA: tendency to remain in one mode of regime behavior
Slower evolving atmospheric flow
Season Mean length [days]JJA (7-Day) 7.9JJA (11-Day) 24.0OND (7-Day) 6.0OND (11-Day)
15.0
REGIMES (CONT….)
2nd RASM May 2012
2-Regime JJAHow persistent do days fall into a 1 or 2-regime window?0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
02468
1012141618
Persistence [days]
Freq
uenc
y
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Persistence [days]
Freq
uenc
y
2-Regime ONDMore persistent days a calendar date falls into
a 2-regime window.
EXTREMES
2nd RASM May 2012
2-Regime JJA [1st P]Cold extremes preferred in 2-regime behavior.
2-Regime OND [99th P]
Warm extremes preferred in 1-regime behavior.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 702468
101214161820
Persistence [days]
Extr
emes
day
-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
20406080
100120140160180200
Persistence [days]
Extr
emes
day
-1
SUMMARY
2nd RASM May 2012
Multiple dynamic regimes persistent, multiple regimes (JJA) less persistent, multiple regimes
(OND) persistent, 1-regime (September)
Implications changing sea-ice area affects regime
persistence future predictability of atmosphere future decline in summer sea ice more persistent regime behavior?
SUMMARY (CONT…)
2nd RASM May 2012
Temperature extremes tendency for more cold (warm)
extremes with 2(1)-regime behavior Future work
regimes: coupled model; modeled vs. prescribed SST’s; similar behavior?
T extremes: 20-year simulation (uncoupled WRF, RASM)
change in energy/moisture budgets allow for a more extreme, future arctic?
Ensemble MSLPModel EstimatedMean95% CI
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
REGIMES
2nd RASM May 2012
More persistent 1-regime behavior vs. JJA and OND.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70
2
4
6
8
10
12
Persistence [days]
Freq
uenc
y
2-Regime September
EXTREMES
2nd RASM May 2012
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 705
101520253035404550
Persistence [days]
Extr
emes
day
-1
2-Regime Sept. [99th P]
Warm extremes preferred in 1-regime behavior. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Persistence [days]
Extr
emes
day
-1
2-Regime Sept. [1st P]
Cold extremes preferred in 2-regime behavior.