1rf -comparing scenarios land use and fiscal impacts

8
Percent of New Homes in Developed Area 37% Percent of New Jobs in Developed Area 64% Homes Left Abandoned 60,668 New Jobs Brought Back to Former Industrial Sites 1,551 New Paved Surfaces (Acres) 15,785 BUSINESS AS USUAL New jobs and homes would continue to eat up rural land, leaving more vacant lots and buildings in the center city and even older first ring suburbs. Suburban towns would build new roads, utilities, parks and schools while existing infrastructure in our urban centers would be neglected and underused. Old industrial sites would grow weeds while new factories and warehouses would spring up on the metropolitan periphery. URBANIZED AREA NEW HOMES NEW JOBS HOMES LEFT ABANDONED What type of development will we see? 146 38,906 39,348 Re-development Acres Grow Where We’ve Already Grown 0% 100% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% WHERE DO OUR SCENARIOS FALL? Growth on Undeveloped vs. Developed Land ALL new growth should be on undeveloped greenfield land ALL new growth should be on land we’ve already developed

Upload: oneregionforward

Post on 19-Jan-2015

151 views

Category:

Environment


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts

Percent of New Homes in Developed Area 37%

Percent of New Jobs in Developed Area

64%

Homes Left Abandoned

60,668

New Jobs Brought Back to Former Industrial Sites 1,551

New Paved Surfaces (Acres)

15,785

BUSINESSAS USUAL

New jobs and homes would continue to eat up rural land, leaving more vacant lots and buildings in the center city and even older first ring suburbs. Suburban towns would build new roads, utilities, parks and schools while existing infrastructure in our urban centers would be neglected and underused.

Old industrial sites would grow weeds while new factories and warehouses would spring up on the metropolitan periphery.

URBANIZED AREA

NEW HOMESNEW JOBS HOMES LEFT ABANDONED

What type of development will we see?

146 38,906 39,348

Re-development

Acres

Grow Where We’ve Already Grown

0% 100%10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

WHERE DO OURSCENARIOSFALL?

Growth on Undeveloped vs. Developed Land

ALL new growth should be on undeveloped

greenfield land

ALL new growth should be on land we’ve already developed

Page 2: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts
Page 3: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts

WHERE DO OURSCENARIOSFALL?

Growth on Undeveloped vs. Developed Land

URBANIZED AREA

NEW HOMESNEW JOBS HOMES LEFT ABANDONED

Grow Where We’ve Already Grown

0% 100%10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

ALL new growth should be on undeveloped

greenfield land

ALL new growth should be on land we’ve already developed

Percent of New Homes in Developed Area

66%

Percent of New Jobs in Developed Area

79%

Homes Left Abandoned

40,776

New Jobs Brought Back to Former Industrial Sites

17,087

New Paved Surfaces (Acres)

8,482

What type of development will we see?

4,298 9,956 12,073

Re-development

Acres

Some new homes and jobs would go on suburban “greenfield” sites but most new development would go in existing urban areas.

Many more jobs would go on reclaimed “brownfield” sites than in the “Business as Usual” scenario.

The increase in new paved surfaces -- roads, parking lots, rooftops -- would be about half as much as the trend.

There would be some housing rehab in the central cities -- but less than in the “city” and “village” scenarios.

SPRAWLINGSMARTER

Page 4: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts
Page 5: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts

WHERE DO OURSCENARIOSFALL?

Growth on Undeveloped vs. Developed Land

URBANIZED AREA

NEW HOMESNEW JOBS HOMES LEFT ABANDONED

Grow Where We’ve Already Grown

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

ALL new growth should be on undeveloped

greenfield land

ALL new growth should be on land we’ve already developed

A REGIONOF VILLAGES

New homes and jobs would be concentrated in Buffalo Niagara’s treasured villages as well as in urban centers of Buffalo, Niagara Falls, and Lockport. Most new development would still occur in existing urban centers and first-ring suburbs, taking advantage of vacant lots, parking lots and underused land.

Every home built in outlying villages would be one home not built or rehabbed in central cities. So, abandonment would be reduced but not as much as in “Back to the City.”

Percent of New Homes in Developed Area

86%

Percent of New Jobs in Developed Area

92%

Homes Left Abandoned

38,783

New Jobs Brought Back to Former Industrial Sites

15,996

New Paved Surfaces (Acres)

6,578

What type of development will we see?

2,841 8,786 2,764Acres

Re-development

0% 100%

Page 6: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts
Page 7: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts

WHERE DO OURSCENARIOSFALL?

Growth on Undeveloped vs. Developed Land

URBANIZED AREA

NEW HOMESNEW JOBS HOMES LEFT ABANDONED

Grow Where We’ve Already Grown

0% 100%10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

ALL new growth should be on undeveloped

greenfield land

ALL new growth should be on land we’ve already developed

BACK TO THE CITY

Most new homes and nearly all new jobs would be focused in central cities and older suburbs -- areas already served by infrastructure. Housing abandonment would be drastically reduced compared with the other scenarios as vacant homes are rehabbed and vacant lots filled in.

Additional “impervious surfaces” -- roads, parking lots, and rooftops -- would be limited.

Reclaimed “brownfields” would host a significant share of new jobs.

Percent of New Homes in Developed Area

88%

Percent of New Jobs in Developed Area

96%

Homes Left Abandoned

15,778

New Jobs Brought Back to Former Industrial Sites

21,700

New Paved Surfaces (Acres)

3,356

What type of development will we see?

8,206 2,581 3,534Acres

Re-development

Page 8: 1RF -Comparing Scenarios Land Use and Fiscal Impacts