1999-2 thu bergman

Upload: subidubi99

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    1/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 1

    A Method of Selecting On-lineCondition Monitoring for

    Substation Power Equipment.

    W.J (Bill) BergmanPower System Solutions

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    2/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 2

    Basis of Presentation

    Canadian Electricity Association (CEA)CEA Project No. 485T1049 On-lineCondition Monitoring of Substation PowerEquipment - Utility Needs January 1997.

    Draft IEEE C37.10.1 Guide to SelectingMonitoring for Power Circuit Breakers

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    3/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 3

    Broader View of Monitoring

    View in context of substation automation On-line condition monitoring SCADA

    Intelligent electronic devices (IED) Automated meter reading (AMR) (customer & system) Environmental data Combine above to leverage greater value from

    individual monitoring investments and goals

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    4/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 4

    Substation/Transmission Automation

    Means of combining data to improveavailable informationMeans of extracting data to gain relevantinformation and avoid duplication ofmonitoringMeans of directing information to most

    appropriate location/user (i.e. operations,maintenance, business, etc.)

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    5/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 5

    Purposes of Monitoring

    Reduce or avoid forced outages,Improve safety to personnel and theenvironment,Improve equipment or power systemutilization,Improve equipment or power systemavailability, (and reliability), andOptimize maintenance costs

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    6/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 6

    Basis of Selecting Monitoring

    Principles of Reliability CenteredMaintenance (RCM) including: Failure Modes and Effects (Criticality)

    Analysis FMEA or FME(C)AValue-based Asset ManagementReview of failure statistics

    Combine existing available & new signalsCommercially products available ?

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    7/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 7

    Reliability Centered Maintenance

    Directed at preservation of functionIntended as a logic structure for value based

    maintenance selectionTechnique can be used to identify designimprovements and select monitoring

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    8/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 8

    Reliability Centered Maintenance

    Select RCM system boundaries andinterfacesDefine functionsFailure Modes, Effects, Criticality AnalysisMatch appropriate maintenance andinspection tasks to failure causes (RCM)Match on-line condition monitoring tofailure characteristic (Monitor Selection)

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    9/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 9

    Failure Modes and Effects(Criticality) Analysis - FME(C)A

    Identify functionsIdentify failure modes

    Identify failure causesIdentify effects of failure modesIdentify criticality or risk

    Select on-line monitoring to match characteristic of developing failure cause(s)

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    10/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 10

    Risk MatrixRisk Matrix

    (Risk probability * consequences)

    Probability

    Consequence I

    Frequent

    II

    Probable

    III

    Occasional

    IV

    Remote

    V

    Improbable1

    CatastrophicA A A B B

    2

    CriticalA A B B C

    3Moderate

    A B B C C4

    NegligibleB C C C C

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    11/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 11

    Failure Statistics Sources

    CEA Forced Outage Performance ofTransmission Equipment for 5 yr periods

    CIGRE Circuit Breaker and TransformerSurveysIEEE 463-1990 Recommended Practice

    for the Design of Reliable Industrial andCommercial Power Systems

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    12/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 12

    CANADIAN ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATIONEQUIPMENT RELIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

    FORCED OUTAGE PERFORMANCE OF TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENTMAJOR COMPONENT

    TRANSMISSIONLINES

    CIRCUITBREAKERS

    CABLE SHUNTREACTOR

    BANK

    CAPACITORBANK

    TRANSFORMERS

    ONE THREEPHASE

    ELEMENT

    THREESINGLE PHASE

    ELEMENTS

    BULKOIL

    MINIMUMOIL

    AIR BLAST SF6LIVE TANK

    VACUUM OTHERSF6DEAD TANK

    VOLTAGE CLASSIFICATION IN kV

    110-149 150-199 200-299 300-399 500-599 600-799

    ALL INTEGRAL SUBCOMPONENTS ALL TERMINAL EQUIPMENT

    WOOD STEEL

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    13/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 13

    Combining of Signals (example)

    interrupter gas pressure interrupter gas temperature

    with the addition of time

    interruptergas density

    interruptergas density

    gasleakagerate predictionof fill time

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    14/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 14

    Value Based (Cost/Benefit) Analysis

    Areas of Value (Cost & Benefit) Inspection Maintenance Consequences of Failure

    Important to include ALL costs since thisforms the pool of costs that can bereduced by monitoring

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    15/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 15

    Inspection Costs Considerations

    Actual inspection laborTravel time and costsContractor servicesTraining time and costsReporting & analyzing results, technicaland management support of inspectionactivitySupport personnel

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    16/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 16

    Maintenance Costs Considerations

    Power system outage costs e.G.Increased losses, loss of revenue

    Actual maintenance laborTravel time and costsContractor servicesTraining time and costs

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    17/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 17

    Maintenance Costs Consideration(contd)

    spare parts management, procurement,warehousing, delivery, interest

    preparation of power system switching schedules

    and orders, issuing of safe work permits Powersystem switching effort, installation and removalof workers protective grounding

    power system outage costs e.g. increased losses,loss of revenue

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    18/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 18

    Failure Resolution Considerations

    Actual failure analysis, rebuild/repair laborTravel time and costs

    Contractor servicesPower system outage costs, e.g. increasedlosses, loss of revenue

    In and Out costs of failed equipmentand replacement equipment, transportation

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    19/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 19

    Conclusions

    Significant benefits to appropriately appliedmonitoring

    Need timely information - not more dataMake better use of existing signals & dataCondition monitoring is a joint effort

    between manufacturers (OEM and 3rd parties, utilities (equipment, P&C,communications) and software developers

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    20/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 20

    Conclusions

    RCM & FMEA (and later RCFA) providelogic structure for application of monitoring

    Significant benefit to standards - particularly transducers, communications protocol & data management

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    21/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 21

    Recommendations

    Individual on-line monitoring efforts needto integrate with the larger and longer termissues of substation and transmissionautomation.

    Utilities need to define long term desired

    outcomes for on-line monitoring

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    22/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 22

    RecommendationsApply condition monitoring in context ofRCM and FME(C)A Use Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM),

    a concept directed at preserving function Use Failure Mode & Effects Criticality

    Analysis (FMECA) directed at identifyingspecific failure causes of functional failuremodes , suggested as a strategy for identifyingand selecting condition monitoringopportunities

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    23/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 23

    Recommendations

    Develop standards for hardware, softwareand communications protocols

    Incorporate future on-line conditionmonitoring into integrated substationautomation SCADA, metering, datacollection, and protection & controls

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    24/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 24

    Recommendations

    Continue to extract or develop informationfrom available data within the substation

    Make better use of existing data supplemented with additional easily obtaineddata/information

    Expert systems need to be developed foron-line monitoring to translate data rapidlyinto recommended action.

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    25/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 25

    Recommendations

    Optimize costs with ability to use a steppedor modular approach to on-line conditionmonitoring implementation.

    Develop improved monitoring sensors

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    26/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 26

    Recommendations

    Standardize and expand on failure /diagnostics reporting

    Further research on failure mechanisms andfailure patterns (associated time to failureand degree of warning knowledge)

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    27/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 27

    References

    CEA Project No. 485T1049 On-lineCondition Monitoring of Substation PowerEquipment - Utility Needs January 1997CEA Forced Outage Performance ofTransmission Equipment for PeriodsJanuary 1, 1988 to December 31, 1992

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    28/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 28

    References

    IEEE C37.10.1 draft Guide for selectingmonitoring for Power Circuit Breakers Aimed at guiding users in the selection and

    application of monitoring to circuit breakers. Based on FMEA , Risk management and

    Economic analysis

    Draft stage

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    29/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 29

    References

    CSA CAN/CSA-Q634-M91Risk AnalysisRequirements and Guidelines

    IEC 812 Analysis techniques for systemreliability - Procedure for failure mode andeffects analysis (FMEA)IEC 1025 Fault tree analysis (FTA)

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    30/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 30

    References

    The First International enquiry on CircuitBreaker Failures & Defects in Service

    ELECTRA No. 79, Dec 1985, pp 21 - 91.{20,000 circuit breakers of all types >63 kVfor the years 1974 through 1977; (77,892circuit-breaker-years)}

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    31/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 31

    References

    Final Report of the Second InternationalEnquiry on High Voltage Circuit BreakerFailures, CIGRE Working Group 13.06Report, June 1994. {18,000 single pressureSF6 circuit breakers >63 kV for the years1988 to 1991; (70,708 circuit-breaker-

    years)}

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    32/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 32

    References

    An International Survey on Failures inLarge Power Transformers in Service -Final report of Working Group 05 ofCIGRE Study Committee 12(Transformers), published in Electra No.88, January 1983.

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    33/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 33

    References

    IEEE 463-1990 Recommended Practicefor the Design of Reliable Industrial andCommercial Power Systems

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    34/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 34

    References

    IEEE C37.10-1996 Guide for circuit breaker diagnostics and failureinvestigationIEEE 1325-1996 Recommended practicefor reporting failure data for power circuit

    breakers

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    35/36

    IEEE Switchgear Condition Monitoring, November 11, 1999 Pittsburgh 35

    References

    ANSI/IEEE C57.117-1986 (Reaff 1992),Guide for Reporting Failure Data forPower Transformers and Shunt Reactors onElectric Power SystemsANSI/IEEE C57.125-1991, Guide forFailure Investigation, Documentation, andAnalysis for Power Transformer and ShuntReactor

  • 8/13/2019 1999-2 Thu Bergman

    36/36

    IEEE S itchgear Condition Monitoring No ember 11 1999 Pittsb rgh 36

    Reference

    Assessment of Reliability Worth inElectric Power Systems in Canada(NSERC Strategic Grant STR0045005Prepared by the Power System ResearchGroup, University of Saskatchewan, June1993)