1998 annual report volume i - california courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article vi was adopted...

266
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS Statewide Workload Trends 1987–88 through 1996–97 and Workload Data for Individual Courts 1995–96 and 1996–97 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

J U D I C I A L C O U N C I L O F C A L I F O R N I AA D M I N I S T R A T I V E O F F I C E O F T H E C O U R T S

Statewide Workload Trends 1987–88 through 1996–97 andWorkload Data for Individual Courts1995–96 and 1996–97

1998

AN

NU

AL

REPO

RT V

OLU

ME

I

Page 2: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

*COMPANION PUBLICATIONS

The Court Statistics Report is part of a three-volume set of annual report publications. It provides detailed

10-year statistical caseload and trend data on a wide variety of court business. ■ State Court Outlook

summarizes key trends, court workload issues, activities and achievements of the Judicial Council/

Administrative Office of the Courts, and court business for California’s appellate and trial courts. ■ Year

in Review describes activities and achievements of the Judicial Council/Administrative Office of the Courts

during 1997 as well as the challenges expected in 1998. ■ All three volumes are published in the Spring and

can be obtained by accessing the California Judicial Branch Web site (www.courtinfo.ca.gov) or by calling

the Judicial Council’s Publications Hotline (415-904-5980 or 800-900-5980).

Court Statistics Report

Statewide Workload Trends Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97 andWorkload Data for Individual Courts Fiscal Years 1995–96 and 1996–97

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA

CHIEF JUSTICE RONALD M. GEORGE, CHAIR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS

WILLIAM C. VICKREY, ADMINISTRATIVE

DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS

Volume IAnnual Report 1998*

Page 3: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Letter of Transmittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..viiJudicial Council of California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..viiiJudicial Council Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..ixProfile of the California Judicial System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..xCalifornia Court System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..xiCalifornia Judicial Branch Employee Utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..xii

SECTION I: STATEWIDE WORKLOAD TRENDSFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Supreme CourtTable 1: Summary of Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Table 2: Summary of Filings and Dispositions—Petitions for Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Table 3: Summary of Filings and Dispositions—Original Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Table 4: Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings Filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Table 5: Summary of Petitions for Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Table 6: Business Transacted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Table 7: Miscellaneous Business Transacted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Figure 1: Filings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Figure 2: Automatic Appeals Filed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Courts of AppealTable 1: Performance Indicator Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Table 2: Caseload Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20Table 3: Filings per Authorized Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23Table 4: Summary of Filings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Table 5: Summary of Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Table 6: Appeals Terminated by Written Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Table 7: Time to Filing of Opinion—Median Time (50th Percentile) in Days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Table 8: Time to Filing of Opinion—90th Percentile Time in Days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28Table 9: Percentage of Majority Opinions Published . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Performance IndicatorsFigure 1: Ratio of Pending Fully Briefed Appeals per 100 Appeals Disposed of by Written Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Figure 2: Pending Fully Briefed Appeals per Authorized Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Figure 3: Majority Opinions per Judge-Equivalent—Appeals and Original Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Figure 4: Time (in Days) from Notice of Appeal to Filing of Opinion for

-A: Civil Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-B: Criminal Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Caseload ComparisonsFigure 5: Caseload Comparison per Authorized Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Figure 6: Record of Appeal Filings in All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Figure 7: Original Proceeding Filings in All Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Figure 8: Record of Appeal Filings in the First District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

INDEX OF TABLES AND FIGURES

iii

Page 4: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

INDEX OF TABLES AND FIGURES(continued)

Figure 9: Record of Appeal Filings in the Second District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Figure 10: Record of Appeal Filings in the Third District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Figure 11: Record of Appeal Filings in the Fourth District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Figure 12: Record of Appeal Filings in the Fifth District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Figure 13: Record of Appeal Filings in the Sixth District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Superior CourtsTable 1: Total Filings and Cases Set for Trial per Judicial Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Table 2: Total Dispositions, Contested Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position Equivalent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39Table 3: Total Filings per Judicial Position and Dispositions per Judicial Position Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42Table 4: Number of Authorized Judicial Positions and Judicial Position Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43Table 5: Civil Filings and Dispositions by Type of Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45Table 6: Civil Dispositions by Type of Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47Table 7: Jury Trials by Type of Proceeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48Table 8: Noncivil Filings and Dispositions by Type of Proceeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51Table 9: Dispositions Before and After Trial by Type of Proceeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Table 10: Criminal Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53Table 11: Total Criminal Data (All Trial Courts) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

Performance IndicatorsFigs. 1A–1D: Total Filings per Authorized Judicial Position. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33Figs. 2A–2D: Dispositions (Excluding Dismissals for Delay in Prosecution) per Judicial Position Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

OthersFigure 3: Total Filings per Judicial Position and Dispositions per Judicial Position Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Figure 4: Total Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Figure 5: General Civil Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44Figure 6: Other Civil Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44Figure 7: Distribution of General Civil Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46Figure 8: Juvenile Delinquency Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49Figure 9: Juvenile Dependency Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49Figure 10: Mental Health Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49Figure 11: Appeals from Lower Courts Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49Figure 12: Habeas Corpus Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50Figure 13: Criminal Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Municipal CourtsTable 1: Nonparking Filings and Cases Awaiting Trial per Judicial Position. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63Table 2: Nonparking Dispositions, Contested Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position Equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73Table 3: Numbers of Courts and Judges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78Table 4: Nonparking Filings and Dispositions by Type of Proceeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79Table 5: Civil Dispositions by Type of Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82Table 6: Criminal Filings and Dispositions by Type of Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83Table 7: Felony Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85Table 8: Misdemeanor and Infraction Dispositions by Type of Proceeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

Performance IndicatorsFigs. 1A–1F: Nonparking Filings per Authorized Judicial Position. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57Figs. 2A–2F: Nonparking Dispositions per Judicial Position Equivalent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

iv

Page 5: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

OthersFigure 3: Other Civil Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80Figure 4: Small Claims Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80Figure 5: Civil Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81Figure 6: Felony Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81Figure 7: Distribution of Felony Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Figure 8: Nontraffic Misdemeanor and Infraction Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86Figure 9: Traffic Misdemeanor Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86Figure 10: Traffic Infraction Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86Figure 11: Criminal Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88

Judicial Assignments and AssistanceTable 1: Assistance Received and Rendered by Type of Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92Table 2: California Superior Courts—Days Received and Rendered. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94Table 3: California Municipal Courts—Days Received and Rendered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

Figure 1: Days of Assistance Rendered by Judge Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

SECTION II: WORKLOAD DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL COURTSFiscal Years 1995–96 and 1996–97

Changes in Judicial Positions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

Court Consolidations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

Trial Court Coordination Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

Courts of AppealTable 1: Summary of Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106Table 2: Summary of Filings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107Table 3: Dispositions of Appeals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108Table 4: Dispositions of Original Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109Table 5: Opinions Written . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110Table 6: Pending Appeals—Total and Fully Briefed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

Superior CourtsTable 1: Summary of All Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112Table 2: Probate and Guardianship Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114Table 3: Family Law Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116Table 4: Motor Vehicle Personal Injury, Death, and Property Damage Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118Table 5: Other Personal Injury, Death, and Property Damage Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120Table 6: Eminent Domain Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Table 7: Other Civil Complaints Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124Table 8: Other Civil Petitions Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126Table 9: Mental Health Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128Table 10: Juvenile Delinquency Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130Table 11: Juvenile Delinquency Filings by Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

v

INDEX OF TABLES AND FIGURES(continued)

Page 6: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Table 12: Juvenile Dependency Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134Table 13: Criminal Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136Table 14: Criminal Dispositions After Uncontested Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138Table 15: Criminal Dispositions After Contested Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140Table 16: Level of Conviction of Criminal Defendants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142Table 17: Criminal Data (All Trial Courts). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144Table 18: Appeals from Lower Courts Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146Table 19: Habeas Corpus Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148Table 20: Dispositions by Jury Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150Table 21: Total Cases Set for Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152Table 22: Number of Authorized Judicial Positions and Judicial Position Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154Table 23: Case-Processing Time—Civil and Criminal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156

Municipal CourtsTable 1: Summary of All Filings and Dispositions (Excluding Parking) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159Table 2: Felony Filings and Dispositions and Sentencing on Felony Guilty Pleas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164Table 3: Dispositions of Felonies and Felonies Reduced to Misdemeanors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169Table 4: Summary of Nontraffic Misdemeanors and Infractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174Table 5: Group A Nontraffic Misdemeanor Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179Table 6: Group B Nontraffic Misdemeanor Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184Table 7: Nontraffic Infraction Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189Table 8: Summary of Nonparking Traffic Misdemeanors and Infractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194Table 9: Group C Traffic Misdemeanor Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199Table 10: Group D Traffic Misdemeanor Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204Table 11: Nonparking Traffic Infraction Filings and Dispositions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209Table 12: Illegal Parking Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214Table 13: Small Claims Filings and Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219Table 14: Civil Filings and Dispositions (Excluding Small Claims) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224Table 15: Number of Jury Dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229Table 16: Total Cases Awaiting Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234Table 17: Number of Authorized Judicial Positions and Judicial Position Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239Table 18: Felonies and Misdemeanors Case-Processing Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244Table 19: Civil Case-Processing Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249

Courts With Incomplete Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255

GlossariesSupreme Court Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261Courts of Appeal Glossary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262Superior Courts Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263Municipal Courts Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

vi

INDEX OF TABLES AND FIGURES(continued)

Page 7: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

TO THE HONORABLE PETE WILSON,Governor of the State of California,and Members of the Legislature:

The Court Statistics Report is presented pursuant to the provisions ofarticle VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

Hon. Ronald M. GeorgeChair

Hon. Marvin R. BaxterHon. Roger W. BorenHon. Carol A. CorriganHon. Richard D. HuffmanHon. Paul BolandHon. J. Richard CouzensHon. Lois HaightHon. Melinda A. JohnsonHon. Kathryn D. ToddHon. Albert DoverHon. Brenda Harbin-ForteHon. Ana Maria LunaHon. Michael B. Orfield

Hon. Eleanor ProvostHon. John L. BurtonHon. Martha M. EscutiaMr. Maurice EvansMr. Sheldon H. SloanMs. Glenda VeaseyMr. Brian C. WalshMs. Sheila GonzalezHon. Dwayne KeyesMr. Joseph A. LaneMr. Stephen V. LoveMr. Ronald OverholtHon. Nori Anne Walla

Mr. William C. VickreySecretary

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

vii

Page 8: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

The Judicial Council of California isrequired by the Constitution to sur-vey the condition of business instate courts and to report and makeappropriate recommendations to theGovernor and the Legislature. (Cal.Const., art. VI, § 6.) The CourtStatistics Report provides detailedstatistical data on the volume ofbusiness in all courts for the fiscalyear ending June 30, 1997. Thereport combines 10-year statewidecourt filing and disposition data andcounty-by-county data for the cur-rent and previous fiscal years.

Constitutional andStatutory Provisionsfor the JudicialCouncilThe Judicial Council was originallyprovided for in section 1(a) of arti-cle VI of the state Constitutionadopted November 2, 1926. Thissection was amended November 8,1960. On November 8, 1966, arevised article VI was adopted andthe provisions of former section 1(a)were amended and renumbered assection 6, further revised in 1974,and amended in 1994, to read:

Sec. 6. The Judicial Council consistsof the Chief Justice and one otherjudge of the Supreme Court, 3 judgesof courts of appeal, 5 judges of supe-rior courts, and 5 judges of munici-pal courts, each appointed by the

Chief Justice for a 2-year term; 4members of the State Bar appointedby its governing body for 2-yearterms; and one member of eachhouse of the Legislature appointed asprovided by the house.

Council membership terminates ifa member ceases to hold the positionthat qualified the member forappointment. A vacancy shall befilled by the appointing power forthe remainder of the term.

The council may appoint anAdministrative Director of theCourts, who serves at its pleasureand performs functions delegated bythe council or Chief Justice, otherthan adopting rules of court adminis-tration, practice and procedure.

To improve the administration ofjustice, the council shall survey judi-cial business and make recommenda-tions to the courts, make recommen-dations annually to the Governor andLegislature, adopt rules for courtadministration, practice and proce-dure, not inconsistent with statute,and perform other functions pre-scribed by statute.

The Chief Justice shall seek toexpedite judicial business and toequalize the work of judges. TheChief Justice may provide for theassignment of any judge to anothercourt but only with the judge’s con-sent if the court is of lower jurisdic-tion. A retired judge who consentsmay be assigned to any court.

Judges shall report to the JudicialCouncil as the Chief Justice directsconcerning the condition of judicialbusiness in their courts. They shallcooperate with the council and holdcourt as assigned.

Other constitutional provisionsdealing with the Judicial Council orthe Chief Justice are found in articleVI, sections 15 and 18(f). There arealso a number of statutory provi-sions referring to the JudicialCouncil.

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA

viii

Court Statistics ReportPublished by

the Administrative Officeof the Courts

William C. Vickrey Administrative Director of theCourts

Dennis B. Jones Chief Deputy Director

Michael BergeisenGeneral Counsel

Dale SipesAssistant DirectorCouncil and Legal Services

Katharine HollandCommunications Supervisor

Ellen McCarthyProject Coordinator

Judicial StatisticsKaren CannataActing ManagerInformation & Records Management

Kathleen ShihStatistician

Cecilia IgnacioAssistant Statistician

EditingFran Haselsteiner

Page 9: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

HON. RONALD M. GEORGE, CHAIRChief Justice of California

Supreme CourtHON. MARVIN R. BAXTERAssociate Justice of the Supreme Court

Courts of AppealHON. ROGER W. BORENPresiding Justice of the Court of AppealSecond Appellate District, Division Two

HON. CAROL A. CORRIGANAssociate Justice of the Court of AppealFirst Appellate District, Division Three

HON. RICHARD D. HUFFMANAssociate Justice of the Court of AppealFourth Appellate District, Division One

Trial CourtsSuperior Courts

HON. PAUL BOLANDJudge of the Los Angeles County

Superior Court

HON. J. RICHARD COUZENSJudge of the Placer County Superior

and Municipal Courts

HON. LOIS HAIGHTJudge of the Coordinated Trial Courts

of Contra Costa County

HON. MELINDA A. JOHNSONJudge of the Ventura County Superior

and Municipal Coordinated Courts

HON. KATHRYN D. TODDJudge of the Los Angeles County

Superior Court

Municipal Courts

HON. ALBERT DOVERJudge of the Nevada County Courts

HON. BRENDA HARBIN-FORTEJudge of the Oakland-Piedmont-

Emeryville Municipal Court

HON. ANA MARIA LUNAJudge of the Southeast Municipal Court

(Los Angeles)

HON. MICHAEL B. ORFIELDJudge of the San Diego Municipal

Court

HON. ELEANOR PROVOSTJudge of the Tuolumne County

Municipal Court

LegislatureHON. JOHN L. BURTONMember of the Senate

HON. MARTHA M. ESCUTIAMember of the Assembly

State BarMR. MAURICE EVANSChief AssistantOrange County District Attorney’s

Office

MR. SHELDON H. SLOANAttorney at Law

MS. GLENDA VEASEYAttorney at Law

MR. BRIAN C. WALSHAttorney at Law

Advisory MembersMS. SHEILA GONZALEZ Executive OfficerVentura County Superior and Municipal

Coordinated Courts

HON. DWAYNE KEYES PresidentCalifornia Judges AssociationJudge of the Fresno County Courts

MR. JOSEPH A. LANE Clerk of the Court of Appeal Second Appellate District

MR. STEPHEN V. LOVE County Clerk/Executive OfficerSanta Clara County Consolidated

Courts

MR. RONALD OVERHOLTExecutive Officer/Clerk Administratively Consolidated Trial

Courts of Alameda County

HON. NORI ANNE WALLACommissionerLos Angeles Municipal Court

SecretaryMR. WILLIAM C. VICKREYAdministrative Director of the Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL MEMBERS

ix

Page 10: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

As of June 30, 1997, the California judicial system consisted of 174courts and 1,580 authorized judgeships, of which 1,537 were filled.(References to judgeships in this report refer to authorized positions.) Thenames of judges of the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and superiorcourts are listed in the California Official Reports.

Approximately 8.9 million cases were filed during fiscal year 1996–97.The judicial system costs in 1997–98, not including capital outlay

for facilities, total $1.78 billion. The Governor’s Budget for 1997–98 in-cluded a successful proposal to restructure the state’s trial court fundingsystem. The proposal consolidated funding of the courts at the state level,ending bifurcated funding between the state and the counties. Countiesare contributing $1.2 billion, or 76 percent of total trial court funding, tothe state as their share for 1997–98. In 1998–99, their share will drop to $831 million, or 48 percent, based on projected total expenditures.

The California Constitution vests the judicial power of the state in aSupreme Court, Courts of Appeal, superior courts, and municipal courts.(Cal. Const., art. VI, § 1.) The superior and municipal courts are thestate’s trial courts; the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal are appellatecourts that primarily review trial court decisions.

The Constitution also provides for three agencies concerned with judi-cial administration: the Judicial Council, which improves the administra-tion of justice (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 6); the Commission on JudicialAppointments, which votes to confirm gubernatorial appointees to appel-late court vacancies (Cal. Const., art. VI, §§ 7, 16); and the Commissionon Judicial Performance, which deals with the admonishment, censure,removal, or retirement of judges for misconduct or disability (Cal. Const.,art. VI, §§ 8, 18).

PROFILE OF THECALIFORNIA JUDICIAL SYSTEM

x

Page 11: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

CALIFORNIA COURT SYSTEM

Courts of Appeal18 divisions with 93 justices

Supreme Court1 Chief Justice and 6 Associate Justices

Superior Courts58 (1 for each county) with total of 806 judges;184 commissioners and referees*

Municipal Courts109 with total of 674 judges;180 commissioners and referees*

Judicial Council Administrative Officeof the Courts

First District4 divisions, 4 justices each; 1 division, 3 justices in San Francisco

Second District6 divisions, 4 justices each in Los Angeles; 1 division, 4 justices in Ventura

Third District1 division, 10 justices in Sacramento

Fourth District1 division, 9 justices in San Diego; 1 division, 6 justices in San Bernardino; 1 division, 6 justices in Santa Ana

Fifth District1 division, 9 justices in Fresno

Sixth District1 division, 6 justices in San Jose

* As of June 30, 1997.** Death penalty cases are automatically appealed from the superior court directly to the Supreme Court.

As of April 1, 1998 (unless otherwise noted)C

apita

l crim

inal

cas

es**

Line of Appeal

Line of Discretionary Review

xi

Page 12: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

The table on the following pagereflects a breakdown of regular, full-time employees in the Californiajudicial branch (Supreme Court,Courts of Appeal, and AdministrativeOffice of the Courts) according tothe Equal Employment OpportunityCommission’s job, ethnic, and gendercategories. Constitutional officersand their attorney and secretarialstaffs are excluded from reportingemployee composition informationand thus have not been included.

The table reflects employee dataas of December 31, 1997. Each col-umn includes the appropriate parityfigure, the actual percentage of judi-cial branch employee utilization,and the correponding number ofemployees. Totals are listed in thefirst column and at the top of thetable.

Parity figures are for the state ofCalifornia and have been includedfor comparative purposes. They arebased on 1990 census informationprovided by the EmploymentDevelopment Department, LaborMarket Information Division. Allinformation provided in this break-down is consistent with the basicEEO-1 format developed by theEqual Employment OpportunityCommission to report employeecomposition. The only exception isthe breakout and examination ofattorneys as a job category separatefrom the other professional staff.

CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCHEMPLOYEE UTILIZATION

xii

Page 13: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

TOTAL, all ethnicities WHITE, not Hispanic BLACK, not Hispanic HISPANIC, all races ASIAN/PAC. ISLANDER, NATIVE AMERICAN, OTHER RACES,not Hispanic not Hispanic not Hispanic

EEO-1 JOB MSA2 % OF # OF MSA % OF # OF MSA % OF # OF MSA % OF # OF MSA % OF # OF MSA % OF # OFCATEGORY PARITY 3 EES4 EES PARITY EES EES PARITY EES EES PARITY EES EES PARITY EES EES PARITY EES EES

TOTAL EMPLOYEESFemales 44.0 63.8 391 27.0 40.5 248 3.1 7.8 48 9.3 4.4 27 4.3 10.6 65 0.3 0.0 0

Males 56.0 36.2 222 33.3 23.8 146 3.1 2.8 17 14.3 4.4 27 4.8 4.6 28 0.4 0.0 0 Total 613 60.3 64.3 394 6.2 10.6 65 23.6 8.8 54 9.0 15.2 93 0.6 0.0 0

OFFICIALS & MANAGERSFemales 43.7 44.9 22 32.1 42.9 21 2.7 0.0 0 4.7 0.0 0 4.0 2.0 1 0.3 0.0 0

Males 56.3 55.1 27 43.1 51.0 25 2.2 0.0 0 5.6 0.0 0 5.0 2.0 1 0.3 0.0 0 Total 49 75.2 93.9 46 4.9 0.0 0 10.3 0.0 0 8.9 4.1 2 0.5 0.0 0

PROFESSIONALSFemales 50.1 60.3 70 37.1 37.9 44 3.2 6.0 7 4.9 4.3 5 4.6 10.3 12 0.3 0.0 0

Males 49.9 39.7 46 37.5 23.3 27 2.2 2.6 3 4.2 2.6 3 5.7 10.3 12 0.2 0.0 0 Total 116 74.6 61.2 71 5.4 8.6 10 9.1 6.9 8 10.3 20.7 24 0.5 0.0 0

ATTORNEYSFemales 27.3 66.4 91 22.8 59.9 82 1.3 2.9 4 1.5 0.7 1 1.6 2.9 4 0.1 0.0 0

Males 72.7 33.6 46 65.3 32.1 44 1.9 0.7 1 3.0 0.7 1 2.3 0.0 0 0.2 0.0 0 Total 137 88.2 92.0 126 3.1 3.6 5 4.5 1.5 2 3.9 2.9 4 0.3 0.0 0

TECHNICIANSFemales 41.2 38.7 12 26.2 12.9 4 3.1 6.5 2 5.4 6.5 2 6.2 12.9 4 0.2 0.0 0

Males 58.8 61.3 19 39.4 32.3 10 3.0 0.0 0 7.1 9.7 3 9.0 16.1 5 0.3 0.0 0 Total 31 65.5 45.2 14 6.1 6.5 2 12.6 16.1 5 15.1 29.0 9 0.5 0.0 0

OFFICE & CLERICALFemales 74.9 72.7 192 48.0 36.4 96 6.5 12.9 34 13.2 6.4 17 6.7 16.7 44 0.5 0.0 0

Males 25.1 27.3 72 13.5 13.6 36 2.5 3.0 8 5.5 6.4 17 3.3 3.8 10 0.2 0.0 0 Total 264 61.5 50.0 132 9.0 15.9 42 18.7 12.9 34 10.0 20.5 54 0.7 0.0 0

SERVICE WORKERSFemales 16.2 25.0 4 10.1 6.3 1 2.6 6.3 1 2.7 12.5 2 0.6 0.0 0 0.2 0.0 0

Males 83.8 75.0 12 54.4 25.0 4 10.6 31.3 5 13.5 18.8 3 4.3 0.0 0 0.9 0.0 0 Total 16 64.5 31.3 5 13.2 37.5 6 16.2 31.3 5 4.9 0.0 0 1.1 0.0 0

1 Employee utilization as of 12/31/97 by EEO-1 job categories, race/ethnicity, and gender for the California judicial branch, excluding attorney and secretariat staff to justices.2 MSA=Metropolitan Statistical Area: California. Source: California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division (1990 census information).3 Percentages throughout spreadsheet under MSA Parity and % of EES do not always appear to add to total as all percentages are rounded to the nearest tenth.4 EES=Employees.

0.1 0.5 3 0.1 0.7 4 0.1 1.1 7

0.0 0.0 0 0.1 2.0 1 0.1 2.0 1

0.1 1.7 2 0.1 .9 1 0.1 2.6 3

0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0

0.1 0.0 0 0.1 3.2 1 0.1 3.2 1

0.1 0.4 1 0.0 0.4 1 0.2 0.8 2

0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.0 0 0.2 0.0 0

MSA % OF # OFPARITY EES EES

CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCHEMPLOYEE UTILIZATION1(continued)

xiii

Page 14: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SECTION I:

STATEWIDE WORKLOAD TRENDS

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Page 15: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPREME COURT

Page 16: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtFIGURE 1-Filings

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Thousands Thousands

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Total Filings*

Petitions for Review

Original Proceedings

Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

FIGURE 2-Automatic Appeals FiledFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

20

25

30

35

40

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Automatic Appeals

*Includes automatic appeals, habeas related to automatic appeals, petitions for review, original proceedings, and attorney disciplinary proceedings. Does not include all matters requiring Supreme Court action, such as requests for publication.

SOURCE: TABLE 1

5

Page 17: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme Court Table 1

Summary of Filings and DispositionsFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Habeas related AttorneyAutomatic to automatic Petitions for Original disciplinary

Fiscal year Total appeals appeals review proceedings proceedings(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

Filings1987–88 4,653 38 — 3,217 1,125 2731988–89 4,578 37 29 3,153 1,031 3281989–90 5,174 34 30 3,409 1,213 4881990–91 5,057 31 34 3,505 1,184 3031991–92 5,403 36 43 3,724 1,331 269

1992–93 5,887 38 39 3,976 1,491 3431993–94 6,817 27 32 4,650 1,675 4331994–95 6,329 30 29 4,254 1,564 4521995–96 6,838 30 33 4,657 1,803 3151996–97 7,601 38 44 5,163 2,047 309

Dispositions1987–88 — 33 — 3,103 — —1988–89 — 51 17 3,140 1,182 —1989–90 — 20 29 3,352 1,158 —1990–91 4,963 28 28 3,458 1,121 3281991–92 5,466 26 36 3,711 1,358 335

1992–93 5,828 25 28 3,979 1,408 3881993–94 6,844 18 43 4,652 1,653 4781994–95 6,564 10 19 4,337 1,669 5291995–96 6,538 14 36 4,587 1,566 3351996–97 7,419 13 22 5,076 1,987 321

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (F). Fiscal years prior to 1988–89 do not include (C) in this total.(B) Death penalty cases.(C) Includes petitions filed both before the court has issued an opinion in the related automatic appeal and after affirmance.(D) Includes appeals and writs from the Court of Appeal. Detailed breakout is shown in Table 2.(E) Petitions for writs filed in the court’s original jurisdiction. Detailed breakout is shown in Table 3.(F) Filings from the State Bar Court recommending disciplinary action and reports of attorneys’ criminal convictions. Detailed breakout is shown in Table 4.

6

Page 18: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 2

Summary of Filings and DispositionsPetitions for ReviewFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Grand Civil CriminalFiscal year total Total Appeals Writs Total Appeals Habeas Other

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)

Filings1987–88 3,217 1,687 1,107 580 1,530 1,135 — 3951988–89 3,153 1,561 989 572 1,592 1,232 — 3601989–90 3,409 1,633 1,040 593 1,776 1,387 — 3891990–91 3,505 1,713 1,102 611 1,792 1,342 — 4501991–92 3,724 1,801 1,276 525 1,923 1,499 154 270

1992–93 3,976 1,831 1,263 568 2,145 1,726 126 2931993–94 4,650 1,819 1,264 555 2,831 2,449 129 2531994–95 4,254 1,724 1,209 515 2,530 2,132 141 2571995–96 4,657 1,782 1,247 535 2,875 2,487 148 2401996–97 5,163 1,898 1,348 550 3,265 2,871 183 211

Dispositions1987–88 3,103 1,630 1,082 548 1,473 1,101 — 3721988–89 3,140 1,583 998 585 1,557 1,202 — 3551989–90 3,352 1,619 1,019 600 1,733 1,345 — 3881990–91 3,458 1,663 1,068 595 1,795 1,369 — 4261991–92 3,711 1,816 1,279 537 1,895 1,453 150 292

1992–93 3,979 1,860 1,276 584 2,119 1,703 124 2921993–94 4,652 1,866 1,286 580 2,786 2,392 128 2661994–95 4,337 1,785 1,268 517 2,552 2,157 139 2561995–96 4,587 1,799 1,256 543 2,788 2,397 152 2391996–97 5,076 1,900 1,327 573 3,176 2,786 168 222

_________(A) (B) + (E).(B) (C) + (D).(C) Cases in which the Court of Appeal case was a civil appeal.(D) Cases in which the Court of Appeal case was a civil original proceeding.(E) Sum of (F) through (H).(F) Cases in which the Court of Appeal case was a criminal appeal. The numbers of filings and dispositions for 1993–94 and 1994–95 were due in part to 444

filings in 1993–94 and 250 filings in 1994–95 resulting from petitions filed pending the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Victor v. Nebraska (1994)511 U.S. 1, affirming People v. Sandoval (1992) 4 Cal.4th 155.

(G) Cases in which the Court of Appeal case was a petition for writ of habeas corpus.(H) Cases in which the Court of Appeal case was a criminal original proceeding. 1991–92 and subsequent years exclude petitions for writ of habeas corpus,

now shown in (G).

7

Page 19: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 3

Summary of Filings and DispositionsOriginal ProceedingsFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Grand Civil CriminalFiscal year total Total PUC Bar Other Total Habeas Other

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)

Filings1987–88 1,125 156 — — 156 969 911 581988–89 1,031 166 7 — 159 865 803 621989–90 1,213 138 11 — 127 1,075 1,036 391990–91 1,184 107 8 — 99 1,077 1,022 551991–92 1,331 297 9 163 125 1,034 970 64

1992–93 1,491 344 0 119 225 1,147 1,104 431993–94 1,675 306 2 131 173 1,369 1,332 371994–95 1,564 234 3 65 166 1,330 1,269 611995–96 1,803 399 3 193 203 1,404 1,349 551996–97 2,047 299 5 218 76 1,748 1,692 56

Dispositions1988–89 1,182 137 — — 137 1,045 985 601989–90 1,158 145 9 — 136 1,013 977 361990–91 1,121 126 12 — 114 995 957 381991–92 1,358 258 10 143 105 1,100 1,032 68

1992–93 1,408 323 1 123 199 1,085 1,039 461993–94 1,653 274 2 137 135 1,379 1,345 341994–95 1,669 245 3 62 180 1,424 1,363 611995–96 1,566 335 3 185 147 1,231 1,179 521996–97 1,987 435 4 216 215 1,552 1,490 62

_________(A) (B) + (F).(B) Sum of (C) through (E).(C) Filings to appeal Public Utility Commission decisions.(D) Administrative State Bar matters. The majority of these cases are voluntary resignations from the bar. Voluntary resignations were not included in the statistics

prior to January 1, 1989, and were included with attorney disciplinary proceedings from January 1, 1989 through 1990–91.(E) 1988–89 and subsequent years exclude PUC cases, now shown in (C).(F) (G) + (H).(G) Petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed in the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction, not including filings related to automatic appeals.(H) 1987–88 and subsequent years exclude petitions for writ of habeas corpus, now shown in (G).

8

Page 20: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 4

Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings FiledFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

1987–88 1988–89 1989–90 1990–91 1991–92 1992–93 1993–94 1994–95 1995–96 1996–97

Total a 273 328 488 303 269 343 433 452 315 309

Record of conviction of crime filed— Suspension ordered because offense involved moral turpitude 33— Referred to State Bar for 95 d 122 d 65 d 0 e 3 e 2 e 0 e 0 e 0 e

determination whether offenses involved moral turpitude 58

State Bar recommendations of suspension or probation 91 89 187 103 231 256 313 303 245 242

State Bar recommendations of disbarment 36 39 52 21 15 28 49 50 62 57

State Bar filings without specific recommendation b 15 2 9 1 0 2 2 0 4 4

Resignations while disciplinary proceedings pending c 40 102 118 113 18 48 60 94 2 4

Petitions for reinstatement 0 1 0 0 5 6 7 5 2 2

_________a Accusations seeking independent review by the Supreme Court without prior recommendation are not included. Accusations are now filed as civil original proceedings.b Or recommendation not noted on docket.c Voluntary resignations from the State Bar are included for filings from January 1, 1989 through 1990–91. These cases are now filed under administrative State Bar matters. d Automated docket data beginning January 1, 1989 do not distinguish offenses that on their face involve moral turpitude as opposed to other crimes.e These cases no longer come directly to the Supreme Court. They are now treated similarly to other disciplinary filings in that initial review is performed by the State Bar

Court. Therefore, most cases that would have appeared in this category are now included in the categories below.

9

Page 21: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 5

Summary of Petitions for ReviewFiscal Year 1996–97

Actions taken on petitions for reviewGranted Granted and Percent

Filed Total Granted and held transferred Denied granted(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

Total 5,163 5,076 111 76 35 4,854 4 %

Total civil 1,898 1,900 72 22 14 1,792 6Civil appeals 1,348 1,327 62 21 1 1,243 6Civil writs 550 573 10 1 13 549 4

Total criminal 3,265 3,176 39 54 21 3,062 4Criminal appeals 2,871 2,786 35 52 10 2,689 3Criminal writs (excluding habeas) 211 222 4 2 7 209 6Habeas 183 168 0 0 4 164 2

_________(A) From Table 2.(B) Sum of (C) through (F).(G) 100 × [(C) + (D) + (E)] / (B).

10

Page 22: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 6

Business TransactedFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Original Alternative proceedings

Petitions for review a writs or disposed ofWritten Granted Granted and Percent orders to without

Fiscal year opinions Granted and held transferred Denied granted show cause opinion(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)

1987–88 122 57 51 98 3,066 6 % 55 9181988–89 120 41 38 61 3,052 4 92 1,1181989–90 100 61 44 45 3,252 4 64 1,1151990–91 127 58 65 70 3,314 6 37 1,0671991–92 89 99 56 24 3,467 5 11 1,204

1992–93 102 84 80 52 3,814 5 13 1,2151993–94 99 97 109 25 4,401 5 12 1,6511994–95 97 97 51 31 4,014 4 3 1,6671995–96 102 77 94 42 4,318 5 4 1,5591996–97 82 111 76 35 4,854 4 7 1,986

_________(F) 100 × [(B) + (C) + (D)] / [(B) + (C) + (D) + (E)].(H) Original proceedings disposed of without an alternative writ or order to show cause. Includes administrative transfers to the Court of Appeal.a The Supreme Court’s exercise of its discretion to grant or deny petitions for review constitutes a significant part of its workload.

11

Page 23: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Supreme CourtTable 7

Miscellaneous Business TransactedFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Motions Routine and Executivedenied or Rehearings miscellaneous clemency

Fiscal year granted Granted Denied orders applications(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

1987–88 15 4 45 2,270 71988–89 70 3 62 2,717 151989–90 38 0 36 3,183 11990–91 45 3 51 3,510 11991–92 46 0 34 3,699 0

1992–93 26 0 39 3,767 01993–94 50 1 40 4,199 01994–95 30 0 42 5,006 01995–96 59 1 38 4,583 01996–97 60 0 29 5,140 0

_________(A) Excludes granted motions to dismiss reported under appeals.(E) See Cal. Const., art. V, § 8.

12

Page 24: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL

Page 25: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 1n The ratio of pending fully briefed

appeals to appeals disposed of bywritten opinion is a measure ofpending workload as well as judicialproductivity. The ratio is an estimateof time a court needs to dispose ofpending fully briefed appeals. A ratioof 100 is equivalent to one year, 50 isequivalent to six months, and so forth.The estimate is based on the assumptionthat the court will decide the samenumber of appeals in 1997–98 as in1996–97.

n The Second District had 25 fully briefedappeals per 100 appeals disposed of byopinions in 1996–97, the lowest ratioamong the six appellate districts. Giventhe assumption noted above, it wouldtake three months for the court todisposed of its pending fully briefedappeals.

n The Fourth District had 81 pendingfully briefed appeals per 100 appealsdisposed of by opinion, the highestamong the six appellate districts.

n The statewide average decreased from51 to 48 pending fully briefed appealsper 100 appeals disposed of by opinion.

n The Sixth District had the largest ratioincrease, from 33 to 46.

FIGURE 1-Ratio of Pending Fully Briefed AppealsPer 100 Appeals Disposed of by Written Opinion

For Appeals Pending as of June 30, 1997And Disposed of in 1996–97

25

38

46

48

50

68

81

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Second

First

Sixth

Statewide

Third

Fifth

Fourth

SOURCE: TABLE 1100 × [(C) / (E)]

15

Page 26: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 2n The Fourth District had the highest

number, with 115 pending fully briefedappeals per authorized justice.

n The First District reported the lowestnumber of pending fully briefed appealsper authorized justice, with 40.

Figure 3n “Judge-equivalent” refers to the number

of authorized justices, adjusted for judicial vacancies, assistance given toother courts, and judicial assistancereceived.

n The statewide average of opinions perjudge-equivalent was 148 in 1996–97,compared to 139 in 1995–96.

n The Second District reported thehighest rate of 171 opinions per judge-equivalent — 16 percent higherthan the statewide average.

n The First District reported the lowestopinion rate, with 109 per judge-equivalent. However, the First Districthad the lowest number of pending fullybriefed appeals per authorized justice.The lower disposition rate may reflectthat fewer cases are available for thejustices.

n Beyond an optimum number of opinions(not yet identified), high rates of disposition indicate overload and a need for additional judgeships.

FIGURE 2-Pending Fully Briefed AppealsPer Authorized Justice

As of June 30, 1997

40

43

57

67

71

88

115

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

First

Second

Sixth

Statewide

Third

Fifth

Fourth

Pending per Authorized Justice

FIGURE 3-Majority Opinions per Judge-Equivalent

Appeals and Original ProceedingsFiscal Year 1996–97

109

124

136

148

154

161

171

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175

First

Sixth

Fifth

Statewide

Third

Fourth

Second

Majority Opinions per Judge-Equivalent

SOURCE: TABLE 1(C) / (A)

SOURCE: TABLE 1[(F) + (G)] / (B)

16

Page 27: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 4-An White portions of the bars represent the

medians. The entire length of the bar(white plus dark portions) represents the90th percentile. Median time refers to thevalue at which half of the cases fall aboveand half below. The 90th percentile timeis the value at which 10 percent of thecases fall above and 90 percent fall below.

n Statewide median time from appeal tofiling of opinion for civil appeals was 528days in 1996–97, compared to 524 days in1995–96; 90th percentile time was 968 daysin 1996–97, compared to 945 days in1995–96.

n Division Three of the Fourth Districtreported 1,204 days, the longest 90thpercentile time from notice of appeal tofiling of opinion for civil appeals disposedof in 1996–97.

n Division Six of the Second District had theshortest 90th percentile time from noticeof appeal to opinion for civil appeals, with542 days.

Figure 4-Bn Statewide median time from appeal to

filing of opinions for criminal appeals was410 days in 1996–97, compared to 394days in 1995–96; 90th percentile time was637 days in 1996–97, compared to 611 daysin 1995–96.

n Division Three of the Fourth District hadthe longest 90th percentile time fromnotice of appeal to filing of opinion forcriminal appeals disposed of in 1996–97,with 769 days.

n Division Six of the Second District had theshortest 90th percentile time for criminalappeals, with 504 days.

0 200 400 600 800

Second Dist. Div. 6

First Dist. Div. 4

Second Dist. Div. 5

First Dist. Div. 1

First Dist. Div. 5

Sixth Dist.

Second Dist. Div. 1

Second Dist. Div. 2

Fourth Dist. Div. 1

Second Dist. Div. 4

Statewide

Third Dist.

Fifth Dist.

Fourth Dist. Div. 2

First Dist. Div. 2

Second Dist. Div. 3

Second Dist. Div. 7

First Dist. Div. 3

Fourth Dist. Div. 3

SOURCES: TABLES 7, 8 column (B)

Days

FIGURE 4-B-Time (in Days) from Notice of Appeal toFiling of Opinion for Criminal Appeals

Median and 90th PercentileFiscal Year 1996–97

305

323

389

330

344

364

403

419

423

419

410

392

414

455

444

464

446

432

581

504

541

547

551

556

579

597

618

619

624

637

637

647

651

658

665

685

717

769

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Second Dist. Div. 6

First Dist. Div. 1

First Dist. Div. 5

Sixth Dist.

First Dist. Div. 4

Third Dist.

First Dist. Div. 3

Fifth Dist.

First Dist. Div. 2

Second Dist. Div. 1

Second Dist. Div. 5

Second Dist. Div. 2

Second Dist. Div. 7

Second Dist. Div. 4

Second Dist. Div. 3

Statewide

Fourth Dist. Div. 2

Fourth Dist. Div. 1

Fourth Dist. Div. 3

SOURCES: TABLES 7, 8 column (A)

351

Days

FIGURE 4-A-Time (in Days) from Notice of Appeal toFiling of Opinion for Civil Appeals

Median and 90th PercentileFiscal Year 1996–97

364

365

402

352

414

455

504

478

538

529

555

595

644

612

528

959

881

542

547

609

624

630

706

734

736

792

802

901

911

950

968

1,026

1,086

1,204

708

749

956

17

Page 28: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 1

Performance Indicator DataFiscal Year 1996–97

AppealsNumber of Full-time Pending becoming Appeals Majority opinionsauthorized judge fully briefed fully briefed disposed of by Original

District justices equivalents appeals in FY 1996–97 written opinion Appeals proceedings(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

Statewide 93 90.3 6,220 13,061 13,079 12,670 685

First 19 18.2 767 2,036 2,004 1,903 84Second 28 28.5 1,201 4,452 4,747 4,608 267Third 10 9.6 709 1,456 1,431 1,401 73Fourth 21 19.0 2,407 2,996 2,977 2,891 160Fifth 9 9.0 796 1,308 1,176 1,158 64Sixth 6 6.0 340 813 744 709 37

_________(A) Authorized justices as of June 30, 1997. Does not include assistance received through assignments or through the Senior Justice Program.(B) “Full-time judge-equivalents” includes a court’s regular number of judges plus 60 percent of the time reported for judges assigned to the

court, minus the time reported for the assignments of the court’s regular members to another court and for unfilled vacancies.(C) Appeals argued, calendared, or ready June 30, 1997.(D) The total number of appeals that became fully briefed during fiscal year 1996–97.(E) Appeals disposed of by opinion during fiscal year 1996–97. Includes appeals filed prior to fiscal year 1996–97.(F) The number of written opinions that decide appeals. One opinion may decide more than one appeal.(G) The number of written opinions that decide original proceedings. One opinion may decide more than one case.

18

Page 29: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 5n This figure measures the courts’ inventory

of appeals per authorized justice by showingpending cases as of June 30, 1996, newfilings, dispositions, and pending cases asof June 30, 1997.

n This figure shows comparisons offilings, dispositions, and pending casesamong courts and the relationship ofpending cases to filings and dispositionswithin individual courts.

n The Fourth District had the highest levelof pending appeals per justice as of June 30, 1997, 29 percent higher than the statewideaverage. The Second District had thehighest level of filings and dispositions perjustice in 1996–97. Second District filingsper justice were 18 percent higher, anddispositions per justice were 23 percenthigher than the statewide average.

n The First District had the lowest level offilings, dispositions, and pending appealsper justice.

n The statewide average of pending appealsper justice was 216 as of June 30, 1996, and 199 as of June 30, 1997, a decreaseof 8 percent.

FIGURE 5-Caseload ComparisonPer Authorized Justice

Fiscal Year 1996–97

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

325

Statewide First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth

Pending at 6/30/96 FilingsDispositions Pending at 6/30/97

SOURCE: TABLE 2

19

Page 30: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 2

Caseload ComparisonsFiscal Year 1996–97

Pending Notices Total appeals Pending Number ofappeals filed disposed of appeals authorized

District as of 6/30/96 in FY 1996–97 in FY 1996–97 as of 6/30/97 justices(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

Statewide 19,006 18,802 18,927 18,505 93

First 2,536 2,726 2,850 2,371 19Second 6,740 6,696 6,990 6,306 28Third 1,809 2,022 2,065 1,741 10Fourth 5,396 4,587 4,438 5,380 21Fifth 1,623 1,681 1,562 1,757 9Sixth 902 1,090 1,022 950 6

_________(A) Includes appeals for which the record has not been filed.(B) Includes appeals for which the record has not been filed.(D) Includes appeals for which the record has not been filed. Column (D) should equal (A) + (B) – (C). Discrepancies may be caused by data entry

problems in any of the four data elements.(E) Authorized justices as of June 30, 1997.

20

Page 31: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

FIGURE 6-Record of Appeal Filings In All Districts

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

æCivil and Juvenile Appeals

ã Criminal Appeals

FIGURE 7-Original Proceeding Filings In All Districts

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Original Proceedings

Criminal Original Proceedings

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appeals

Criminal Appeals

FIGURE 8-Record of Appeal Filings In the First District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appeals

Criminal Appealsã

æ

FIGURE 9-Record of Appeal Filings In the Second District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

21

Page 32: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appeals

Criminal Appeals

FIGURE 10-Record of Appeal Filings In the Third District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appeals

Criminal Appeals

FIGURE 11-Record of Appeal Filings In the Fourth District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appeals

Criminal Appeals

FIGURE 12-Record of Appeal Filings In the Fifth District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Civil and Juvenile Appealsä

æCriminal Appeals

FIGURE 13-Record of Appeal Filings In the Sixth District

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

æ

ä

22

Page 33: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of Appeal Table 3

Filings per Authorized JusticeFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Contested matters Records of appeal Original proceedingsPer Per Per

Authorized authorized authorized authorizedFiscal year justices Total justice Total justice Total justice

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

1987–88 88 18,045 205 11,040 125 7,005 801988–89 88 18,508 210 11,542 131 6,966 791989–90 88 20,248 230 13,012 148 7,236 821990–91 88 20,049 228 13,024 148 7,025 801991–92 88 21,628 246 14,763 168 6,865 78

1992–93 88 21,471 244 14,308 163 7,163 811993–94 88 21,386 243 14,267 162 7,119 811994–95 88 22,336 254 14,923 170 7,413 841995–96 88 23,710 269 15,641 178 8,069 921996–97 93 25,760 277 16,881 182 8,879 95

_________(B) (D) + (F). “Total contested matters” means all appeals and original proceedings; it excludes motions to dismiss on clerk’s certificate, rehearings, and

miscellaneous orders, which do not significantly add to the court’s workload.(C) (B) / (A).(E) (D) / (A).(G) (F) / (A).

23

Page 34: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 4

Summary of FilingsFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Totalcontested Records of appeal filed Original proceedings

Fiscal year matters Total Civil Criminal Juvenile Total Civil Criminal Juvenile(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)

1987–88 18,045 11,040 5,336 5,704 — 7,005 4,063 2,942 —1988–89 18,508 11,542 5,332 6,210 — 6,966 3,857 3,109 —1989–90 20,248 13,012 5,264 6,569 1,179 7,236 4,089 3,082 651990–91 20,049 13,024 5,374 6,275 1,375 7,025 3,909 3,014 1021991–92 21,628 14,763 5,962 7,114 1,687 6,865 3,705 2,955 205

1992–93 21,471 14,308 5,934 6,812 1,562 7,163 3,820 3,139 2041993–94 21,386 14,267 5,786 6,873 1,608 7,119 3,717 3,231 1711994–95 22,336 14,923 5,367 7,884 1,672 7,413 3,748 3,301 3641995–96 23,710 15,641 5,628 8,087 1,926 8,069 4,012 3,379 6781996–97 25,760 16,881 6,387 8,610 1,884 8,879 4,236 4,020 623

Notices of appeal filedFiscal year Total Civil Criminal Juvenile

(J) (K) (L) (M)

1987–88 13,627 7,635 5,992 —1988–89 14,293 8,129 6,164 —1989–90 15,337 7,590 6,552 1,1951990–91 15,900 7,782 6,665 1,4531991–92 17,457 8,454 7,250 1,753

1992–93 17,032 8,271 7,195 1,5661993–94 17,575 8,550 7,317 1,7081994–95 18,362 8,097 8,519 1,7461995–96 18,843 8,071 8,733 2,0391996–97 18,802 7,963 8,818 2,021

_________(A) (B) + (F). “Total contested matters” means all appeals and original proceedings; it excludes motions to dismiss on clerk’s certificate, rehearings, and

miscellaneous orders, which do not significantly add to the court’s workload.(B) Sum of (C) through (E).(C) Includes juvenile appeals for 1988–89 and prior years.(F) Sum of (G) through (I).(G) Includes juvenile original proceedings for 1988–89 and prior years.(J) Sum of (K) through (M).(K) Includes juvenile appeals for 1987–88 and 1988–89.

24

Page 35: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 5

Summary of DispositionsFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Appeals Original proceedingsTotal

dispositions By Without Without ByTotal by written written opinion, opinion, written Without

Fiscal year dispositions opinion opinion record filed no record filed opinion opinion(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)

1987–88 20,827 8,741 8,142 2,435 2,916 599 6,7351988–89 20,956 9,483 8,806 2,389 2,691 677 6,3931989–90 21,957 10,349 9,621 2,673 2,248 728 6,6871990–91 22,576 10,716 9,982 2,898 2,430 734 6,5321991–92 22,415 11,718 11,003 3,032 2,653 715 5,012

1992–93 24,237 12,075 11,453 3,121 2,447 622 6,5941993–94 24,106 12,090 11,519 2,962 2,335 571 6,7191994–95 24,534 12,204 11,521 3,003 2,469 683 6,8581995–96 25,584 12,675 11,824 3,200 2,414 851 7,2951996–97 28,087 13,928 13,079 3,395 2,453 849 8,311

_________(A) Sum of (C) through (G).(B) (C) + (F).

25

Page 36: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 6

Appeals Terminated by Written OpinionFiscal Years 1994–95 through 1996–97

Total cases Affirmance Reversed DismissedFiscal year Total Full With modification

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L)

Total appeals1994–95 11,207 100 % 9,869 88 % 8,106 72 % 1,763 16 % 1,171 10 % 167 1 %1995–96 11,420 100 10,031 88 8,307 73 1,724 15 1,213 11 176 21996–97 12,600 100 11,063 88 8,767 70 2,296 18 1,311 10 226 2

Criminal appealsby defendants1994–95 6,233 100 6,002 96 4,764 76 1,238 20 197 3 34 11995–96 6,255 100 6,001 96 4,850 78 1,151 18 215 3 39 11996–97 7,070 100 6,750 95 5,025 71 1,725 24 268 4 52 1

Criminal appealsby prosecution1994–95 80 100 24 30 20 25 4 5 53 66 3 41995–96 179 100 73 41 42 23 31 17 97 54 9 51996–97 171 100 83 49 53 31 30 18 78 46 10 6

Civil appeals1994–95 3,881 100 2,904 75 2,504 65 400 10 869 22 108 31995–96 3,957 100 2,999 76 2,571 65 428 11 850 21 108 31996–97 4,197 100 3,177 76 2,755 66 422 10 898 21 122 3

Juvenile appeals a

(criminal violation)1994–95 552 100 526 95 432 78 94 17 22 4 4 11995–96 626 100 600 96 504 81 96 15 24 4 2 01996–97 704 100 667 95 570 81 97 14 36 5 1 0

Other juvenileappeals b

1994–95 461 100 413 90 386 84 27 6 30 7 18 41995–96 403 100 358 89 340 84 18 4 27 7 18 41996–97 458 100 386 84 364 79 22 5 31 7 41 9

________(A) (C) + (I) + (K). Total does not match Table 1 due to missing data. Percentages are calculated based on totals shown in column (A).(B) (D) + (J) + (L). Components may not add to total due to rounding.a Juvenile appeals filed under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602 alleging violation of a criminal statute.b Juvenile appeals filed under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 or § 601. These cases do not involve violations of criminal statutes.

26

Page 37: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 7

Time to Filing of OpinionMedian Time (50th Percentile) in DaysFiscal Year 1996–97

Notice of appeal Fully briefedto filing of opinion to filing of opinion

Courts of Appeal Civil Criminal Juvenile Civil Criminal Juvenile(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

Statewide 528 410 270 152 119 78

First District 404 364 307 152 98 75Division One 364 330 314 115 76 58Division Two 478 444 322 242 172 92Division Three 455 432 327 202 142 87Division Four 352 323 270 119 66 52Division Five 365 344 293 112 96 77

Second District 545 406 272 99 75 67Division One 538 403 237 64 52 51Division Two 555 419 274 90 66 68Division Three 612 464 287 128 115 77Division Four 644 423 280 147 90 71Division Five 529 389 278 100 58 66Division Six 351 305 241 97 73 64Division Seven 595 446 292 89 83 70

Third District 414 392 233 168 141 54

Fourth District 856 465 256 560 172 112Division One 881 419 225 617 142 104Division Two 749 455 294 401 162 99Division Three 956 581 280 735 344 120

Fifth District 504 414 282 303 191 92

Sixth District 402 364 294 149 125 102

27

Page 38: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 8

Time to Filing of Opinion90th Percentile Time in DaysFiscal Year 1996–97

Notice of appeal Fully briefedto filing of opinion to filing of opinion

Courts of Appeal Civil Criminal Juvenile Civil Criminal Juvenile(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

Statewide 968 637 435 622 283 160

First District 666 630 465 326 250 151Division One 547 551 538 200 137 127Division Two 736 658 515 398 295 191Division Three 708 717 573 357 344 168Division Four 630 541 413 311 172 123Division Five 609 556 382 224 151 119

Second District 878 610 433 226 146 115Division One 792 597 374 126 98 83Division Two 901 618 475 165 112 100Division Three 959 665 488 308 172 137Division Four 950 624 484 437 141 130Division Five 802 547 443 199 138 168Division Six 542 504 336 175 152 105Division Seven 911 685 452 196 170 144

Third District 706 637 375 397 336 121

Fourth District 1,134 666 451 818 339 197Division One 1,086 619 389 709 238 180Division Two 1,026 651 558 586 251 196Division Three 1,204 769 487 862 450 213

Fifth District 734 647 407 419 348 144

Sixth District 624 579 423 218 219 152

28

Page 39: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Courts of AppealTable 9

Percentage of Majority Opinions PublishedFiscal Year 1996–97

Civil Criminal Juvenile OriginalCourts of Appeal Total appeals appeals appeals proceedings

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

Statewide 7 % 12 % 4 % 2 % 18 %

First District 10 18 6 3 14Division One 9 16 6 0 9Division Two 14 27 6 7 13Division Three 9 15 6 1 11Division Four 10 18 7 4 11Division Five 9 14 4 0 35

Second District 7 10 3 2 24Division One 6 10 1 5 21Division Two 4 5 1 0 29Division Three 6 11 2 0 23Division Four 10 14 5 2 23Division Five 5 9 2 2 14Division Six 7 12 3 2 29Division Seven 12 13 10 7 36

Third District 6 14 3 1 18

Fourth District 6 10 3 2 16Division One 6 15 3 2 6Division Two 5 8 3 0 41Division Three 6 8 2 3 22

Fifth District 4 13 3 3 5

Sixth District 5 6 5 4 14

29

Page 40: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS

Page 41: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 1-An Siskiyou reported the highest filings

per authorized judicial position of all superior courts in FY 1996–97,with 2,518.

n The group average of 1,081 wasthe lowest among the four groupsbecause six of the 10 superiorcourts reporting the lowest averagenumber of filings per authorizedjudicial position are in this group.

Figure 1-Bn This group’s average number of 1,334

filings per authorized judicial positionis the highest among the four groups.

n All the superior courts in this group, with the exception of Yubaand Nevada, had averages abovethe statewide average.

FIGURE 1-A-Total FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Superior Courts with One Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

78

148

354

558

654

741

976

1,071

1,081

1,171

1,310

1,440

1,581

1,717

1,990

2,518

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Glenn**

Trinity**

Alpine

Sierra

Mono

Modoc

Mariposa

Colusa

Plumas

Inyo

Group Average*

State Average*

Amador

Calaveras

Lassen

San Benito

Del Norte

Siskiyou

SOURCE: TABLE 1

931

973

1,171

1,196

1,283

1,334

1,427

1,468

1,561

1,865

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

Mendocino**

Nevada

Yuba

State Average*

Tuolumne

Sutter

Group Average*

Tehama

Lake

Humboldt

Madera

Figure 1-B-Total FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Superior Courts with Two to Three Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

SOURCE: TABLE 1

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

33

Page 42: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 1-Cn Three of the 10 courts with the

highest averages and two of the 10courts with lowest average filingsper authorized judicial position arein this group.

Figure 1-Dn The group average of 1,160 filings

per authorized judicial position wasthe closest to the statewide average.

FIGURE 1-C-Total FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Superior Courts with Four to Ten Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

793

866

932

1,009

1,049

1,109

1,171

1,207

1,209

1,220

1,253

1,272

1,402

1,606

1,700

1,993

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

Imperial**

Napa

Marin

Yolo

Placer

El Dorado

Santa Cruz

State Average*

Kings

San Luis Obispo

Butte

Group Average*

Shasta

Sonoma

Tulare

Monterey

Merced

676

949

954

996

1,059

1,078

1,160

1,160

1,171

1,200

1,208

1,256

1,281

1,311

1,345

1,462

1,479

1,513

1,647

1,710

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

San Francisco

Santa Clara

Alameda

Orange

San Mateo

Los Angeles

Solano

Group Average

State Average*

Contra Costa

Ventura

Stanislaus

Santa Barbara

Sacramento

San Diego

San Joaquin

Fresno

Kern

Riverside

San Bernardino

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

SOURCE: TABLE 1

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Figure 1-D-Total FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Superior Courts with Eleven or More Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.

34

Page 43: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts Table 1

Total Filings and Cases Set for TrialPer Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases set for trialJudicial Per Total Per

positions judicial as of judicialCourt as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 988.6 1,160,589 1,171 a — 46,935 51 b —

Alameda 39.0 37,187 954 42 — i — —Alameda Municipal c — 76 — — — — —Berkeley Municipal c — 98 — — — — —Fremont Municipal c — 1,316 — — — — —

Alpine 1.0 78 78 54 6 6 47Amador 1.0 1,310 1,310 21 — i — —Butte 7.0 8,541 1,220 26 504 72 4Calaveras 1.0 1,440 1,440 16 — i — —Colusa 1.0 741 741 48 22 22 41Contra Costa 23.0 27,596 1,200 30 906 39 26

Bay Municipal c — 0 — — — — —Delta Municipal c — 0 — — — — —Mt. Diablo Municipal c — 4 — — — — —Walnut Creek Municipal c — 0 — — — — —

Del Norte 1.0 1,990 1,990 3 — — —El Dorado 5.0 5,247 1,049 37 319 64 8Fresno 22.0 32,542 1,479 13 1,070 49 19Glenn 1.0 707 i — — 7 7 46Humboldt 3.0 4,682 1,561 11 179 60 10Imperial 4.0 3,364 i — — 128 i — —Inyo 1.0 1,071 1,071 35 29 29 39Kern 18.0 27,235 1,513 12 1,242 69 5

Bakersfield Municipal c — 162 — — — — —East Kern Municipal c — 509 — — — — —North Kern Municipal c — 41 — — — — —South Kern Municipal c — 31 — — — — —

Kings 4.0 4,827 1,207 29 106 27 40Lake 2.0 2,936 1,468 14 79 40 25Lassen 1.0 1,581 1,581 10 35 35 33Los Angeles 313.2 337,697 1,078 34 17,378 55 13Madera 3.0 5,595 1,865 4 371 124 1Marin 8.0 6,925 866 46 342 43 24Mariposa 1.0 654 654 50 19 19 44Mendocino 3.0 2,267 i — — — i — —Merced 4.0 7,973 1,993 2 313 78 3Modoc 1.0 558 558 51 8 8 45Mono 1.0 354 354 52 20 20 42Monterey 8.0 13,601 1,700 7 452 57 12

Monterey Municipal c — 73 — — — — —Napa 5.0 3,967 793 47 189 38 29Nevada 3.0 2,793 931 45 142 47 21Orange 79.0 78,697 996 39 3,519 45 22Placer 7.0 7,065 1,009 38 269 38 28Plumas 1.0 976 976 40 6 6 47Riverside 34.0 56,012 1,647 8 1,728 51 18

35

Page 44: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts Table 1

Total Filings and Cases Set for TrialPer Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases set for trialJudicial Per Total Per

positions judicial as of judicialCourt as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 988.6 1,160,589 1,171 a — 46,935 51 b —

Sacramento 38.0 49,813 1,311 20 1,993 52 16San Benito 1.0 1,717 1,717 5 32 32 36San Bernardino 36.0 61,560 1,710 6 1,414 39 27San Diego 78.0 104,948 1,345 19 2,933 i — —

El Cajon Municipal c — 4,086 — — — — —North Municipal c — 0 — — — — —

San Francisco 40.0 27,030 676 49 2,722 68 6San Joaquin 14.0 20,461 1,462 15 518 37 30San Luis Obispo 6.0 7,254 1,209 27 262 44 23San Mateo 19.0 20,123 1,059 36 1,026 54 14Santa Barbara 11.0 14,095 1,281 23 394 36 31Santa Clara 49.0 46,491 949 43 1,644 34 34Santa Cruz 6.0 6,651 1,109 33 285 48 20Shasta 6.0 7,631 1,272 24 307 51 17Sierra 1.0 148 148 53 2 2 49Siskiyou 1.0 2,518 2,518 1 66 66 7Solano 12.0 13,916 1,160 32 357 30 38Sonoma 10.0 14,016 1,402 18 598 60 9Stanislaus 12.4 15,571 1,256 25 1,465 118 2

Stanislaus Municipal c — 39 — — — — —Sutter 3.0 3,848 1,283 22 90 30 37Tehama 2.0 2,853 1,427 17 65 33 35Trinity 1.0 120 i — — — i — —Tulare 9.0 14,450 1,606 9 475 53 15

Tulare Municipal c — 217 — — — — —Tuolumne 2.0 2,391 1,196 31 114 57 11Ventura 17.0 20,544 1,208 28 580 i — —Yolo 5.0 4,659 932 44 99 20 43Yuba 3.0 2,920 973 41 106 35 32

________(A) Judicial positions include court commissioners and referees in addition to the number of judges authorized for the court.(C) Civil and criminal cases for which trial dates have been assigned. Municipal courts do not report superior court cases set for trial.a Excludes courts missing data; also excludes municipal court coordination data.b Excludes courts missing data on cases set for trial.c Municipal court that handles superior court filings through trial court coordination.i Incomplete.

36

Page 45: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 2-An This group had the lowest average

of all four groups. Many of thesecourts are located in rural counties and had fewer filings.

n Seven of the 10 courts with the lowestaverage number of dispositions perjudicial position equivalent are in thisgroup.

n Among all four groups, this grouphad the largest range between thesuperior courts with the highest andlowest number of dispositions perjudicial position equivalent.

Figure 2-Bn Of the four groups, this group had the

smallest range between the superiorcourts with the highest and lowestnumber of dispositions per judicialposition equivalent.

n This group had the highest averageof all four groups, with 1,130.

36

193

290

327

452

564

610

671

672

783

831

860

891

945

1,388

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Glenn**

Inyo**

Trinity**

Alpine

Sierra

Mono

Modoc

Plumas

Mariposa

Colusa

Calaveras

Amador

Group Average*

San Benito

State Average*

Lassen

Siskiyou

Del Norte

765

809

860

892

1,030

1,076

1,130

1,165

1,184

1,271

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Mendocino**

Nevada

Yuba

State Average*

Tehama

Lake

Tuolumne

Group Average*

Madera

Sutter

Humboldt

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 2

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

SOURCE: TABLE 2

FIGURE 2-B-Dispositions (Excluding Dismissals for Delayin Prosecution) per Judicial Position Equivalent

Superior Courts with Two to Three Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

FIGURE 2-A-Dispositions (Excluding Dismissals for Delayin Prosecution) per Judicial Position Equivalent

Superior Courts with One Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

** Incomplete.

37

Page 46: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Figure 2-Cn Monterey, with 1,677, reported the

highest number of dispositions per judicial position equivalent among all superiorcourts.

Figure 2-Dn This group’s average of 927 dispositions

per judicial position equivalent is theclosest to the statewide average.

587

606

677

786

835

860

957

966

1,011

1,043

1,073

1,077

1,099

1,255

1,263

1,677

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

Imperial**

El Dorado

Marin

Napa

Yolo

Shasta

State Average*

Butte

Placer

Sonoma

Group Average*

Kings

San Luis Obispo

Santa Cruz

Merced

Tulare

Monterey

FIGURE 2-C-Dispositions (Excluding Dismissals for Delayin Prosecution) per Judicial Position Equivalent

Superior Courts with Four to Ten Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

653

685

774

777

786

805

860

880

927

997

1,003

1,014

1,059

1,080

1,106

1,136

1,221

1,327

1,471

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

San Francisco**

Los Angeles

San Mateo

Ventura

Orange

Alameda

Santa Clara

State Average*

Contra Costa

Group Average*

Sacramento

Solano

Santa Barbara

San Joaquin

San Diego

Riverside

Fresno

San Bernardino

Stanislaus

Kern

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

SOURCE: TABLE 2

SOURCE: TABLE 2

FIGURE 2-D-Dispositions (Excluding Dismissals for Delayin Prosecution) per Judicial Position Equivalent

Superior Courts with Eleven or More Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.** Incomplete.

38

Page 47: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 2

Total Dispositions, Contested Trials, andJury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trialsJudicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position positionFY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

Court (A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 1,080.4 917,458 860 a — 64,142 58 a — 9,275 9 a —

Alameda 42.3 33,252 786 34 2,755 65 19 329 8 29Alameda Municipal b — 36 — — 5 — — 2 — —Berkeley Municipal b — 30 — — 5 — — 1 — —Fremont Municipal b — 654 — — 0 — — 0 — —Livermore Municipal b — 206 — — 0 — — 0 — —Oakland Municipal b — 1,464 — — 0 — — 0 — —San Leandro Municipal b — 77 — — 0 — — 0 — —

Alpine 1.0 36 36 52 4 4 53 0 0 51Amador 1.6 1,075 672 41 68 43 32 4 3 47Butte 7.2 6,892 957 25 221 31 43 47 7 35Calaveras 1.5 1,007 671 42 27 18 50 12 8 25Colusa 1.1 671 610 44 27 25 47 8 7 32Contra Costa 25.8 22,698 880 29 1,398 54 26 274 11 13

Bay Municipal b — 13 — — 0 — — 0 — —Delta Municipal b — 21 — — 0 — — 0 — —Mt. Diablo Municipal b — 28 — — 5 — — 0 — —Walnut Creek Municipal b — 2 — — 2 — — 1 — —

Del Norte 1.1 1,527 1,388 3 36 33 42 14 13 5El Dorado 6.5 3,814 587 46 229 35 39 42 6 36Fresno 23.7 26,921 1,136 11 1,588 67 17 229 10 19Glenn 1.1 526 i — — 29 i — — 1 i — —Humboldt 3.4 4,321 1,271 5 263 77 13 35 10 15Imperial 3.9 3,134 i — — 146 i — — 14 i — —Inyo 0.7 i 802 — — 26 — — 7 — —Kern 19.1 28,105 1,471 2 1,281 67 16 352 18 1

Bakersfield Municipal b — 223 — — 78 — — 25 — —East Kern Municipal b — 966 — — 553 — — 0 — —North Kern Municipal b — 77 — — 0 — — 0 — —South Kern Municipal b — 38 — — 0 — — 0 — —

Kings 4.0 4,292 1,073 17 163 41 34 42 11 14Lake 2.4 2,473 1,030 19 223 93 7 34 14 2Lassen 1.4 1,247 891 28 191 136 1 14 10 16Los Angeles 347.4 226,906 653 43 18,482 53 27 2,760 8 26Madera 3.1 3,612 1,165 10 75 24 48 26 8 22Marin 9.1 5,518 606 45 580 64 20 89 10 17Mariposa 1.0 564 564 47 20 20 49 2 2 48Mendocino 4.4 1,919 i — — 166 i — — 11 i — —Merced 4.3 5,396 1,255 7 106 25 46 16 4 46Modoc 1.1 360 327 49 15 14 52 2 2 49Mono 1.0 290 290 50 51 51 28 1 1 50

39

Page 48: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 2

Total Dispositions, Contested Trials, andJury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trialsJudicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position positionFY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

Court (A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 1,080.4 917,458 860 a — 64,142 58 a — 9,275 9 a —

Monterey 7.5 12,576 1,677 1 676 90 9 64 9 21Monterey Municipal b — 51 — — 46 — — 0 — —

Napa 4.9 3,319 677 40 166 34 40 30 6 39Nevada 3.3 2,526 765 38 118 36 36 22 7 34Orange 87.0 67,632 777 36 4,809 55 24 678 8 28Placer 6.6 6,377 966 24 569 86 10 34 5 43Plumas 1.2 542 452 48 54 45 30 0 0 51Riverside 33.5 37,040 1,106 12 3,394 101 6 388 12 9Sacramento 42.5 42,354 997 23 1,794 42 33 305 7 33San Benito 1.6 1,329 831 31 97 61 22 12 8 30San Bernardino 38.7 47,265 1,221 8 1,538 40 35 245 6 38San Diego 86.3 93,166 1,080 14 5,417 63 21 1,001 12 8

El Cajon Municipal b — 5,754 — — 1,322 — — 42 — —North Municipal b — 66 — — 45 — — 21 — —

San Francisco 43.4 18,189 i — — 2,039 47 29 251 6 40San Joaquin 14.9 15,786 1,059 18 1,538 103 5 144 10 18San Luis Obispo 6.3 6,785 1,077 15 577 92 8 40 6 37San Mateo 19.9 13,641 685 39 591 30 45 103 5 42Santa Barbara 12.1 12,264 1,014 20 428 35 37 68 6 41Santa Clara 55.7 44,819 805 33 3,690 66 18 439 8 27Santa Cruz 5.3 5,823 1,099 13 372 70 15 59 11 10Shasta 7.1 5,928 835 30 390 55 25 79 11 11Sierra 0.6 116 193 51 9 15 51 0 0 51Siskiyou 1.5 1,418 945 26 123 82 12 16 11 12Solano 10.4 10,427 1,003 22 872 84 11 128 12 6Sonoma 10.8 10,924 1,011 21 381 35 38 87 8 24Stanislaus 12.4 16,455 1,327 4 1,374 111 2 172 14 4

Stanislaus Municipal b — 128 — — 10 — — 9 — —Sutter 3.1 3,671 1,184 9 320 103 4 27 9 20Tehama 2.3 2,052 892 27 69 30 44 27 12 7Trinity 1.0 i 92 i — — 14 i — — 2 i — —Tulare 9.6 12,125 1,263 6 421 44 31 135 14 3

Tulare Municipal b — 218 — — 19 — — 19 — —Tuolumne 2.3 2,475 1,076 16 176 77 14 17 7 31Ventura 21.0 16,257 774 37 1,205 57 23 176 8 23Yolo 5.2 4,085 786 35 556 107 3 25 5 45Yuba 3.2 2,590 809 32 105 33 41 16 5 44

__________(A) Reflects authorized judicial positions adjusted for vacancies, assistance rendered by the court, and assistance received by the court from assigned judges,

temporary judges, commissioners, and referees.(B) Excludes civil dismissals for delay in prosecution.a Excludes courts missing data on dispositions; also excludes municipal court coordination data.b Municipal court that handles superior court dispositions through trial court coordination.i Incomplete.

40

Page 49: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts FIGURE 3-Total Filings per Judicial Position and Dispositions per Judicial Position Equivalent

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Filings per Judicial Position

Dispositions per Judicial Position Equivalent

FIGURE 4-Total Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Filings

Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

SOURCE: TABLE 3

SOURCE: TABLE 3

41

Page 50: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 3 Total Filings per Judicial Position and

Dispositions per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Filings DispositionsTotal number

Total number Per of judicial Per judicialof judicial judicial position position

Fiscal year positions Total position equivalents Total equivalent(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

1987–88 839 920,874 1,098 877 735,012 8381988–89 899 948,281 1,055 875 782,169 8941989–90 905 980,216 1,083 934 831,425 8901990–91 920 1,003,679 1,091 967 842,041 8711991–92 927 1,055,271 1,138 1,013 910,696 899

1992–93 936 1,057,905 1,130 1,031 901,408 8731993–94 952 1,069,349 1,125 a 1,040 881,412 847 a

1994–95 958 1,133,601 1,182 a 1,060 908,047 854 a

1995–96 968 r 1,193,917 r 1,228 a,r 1,069 r 920,097 r 853 a,r

1996–97 989 1,160,589 1,171 a 1,080 917,458 860 a

_________(A) Judicial positions include court commissioners and referees in addition to the number of judges authorized for the court.(B) For all types of proceedings. Sum of Table 5 column (A) and Table 8 column (A).(C) (B) / (A).(D) Reflects authorized judicial positions adjusted for assistance rendered by the court and assistance received by the court from assigned judges, temporary judges,

temporary commissioners, and referees.(E) Sum of Table 5 column (A) and Table 8 column (A). Excludes civil dismissals for delay in prosecution.(F) (E) / (D).a Excludes courts missing data; also excludes municipal court coordination data.r Revised.

42

Page 51: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 4 Number of Authorized Judicial Positions

and Judicial Position EquivalentsAs of June 30, 1988 through 1997

Judicial positionsCourt commissioners and referees Judicial

positionAs of June 30, Total Judges Total Commissioners Referees equivalents

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

1988 839 725 114 92 22 8771989 899 788 111 94 17 8751990 905 789 116 101 15 9341991 920 789 131 108 23 9671992 927 789 138 114 24 1,013

1993 936 789 147 120 27 1,0311994 952 789 163 123 40 1,0401995 958 789 169 130 39 1,0601996 968 r 789 179 r 138 r 41 r 1,069 r

1997 989 805 184 143 41 1,080

_________(A) (B) + (C).(C) (D) + (E).(F) Reflects authorized judicial positions adjusted for vacancies, assistance rendered by the court, and assistance received by the court from assigned judges, temporary judges, commissioners, and referees.r Revised.

43

Page 52: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 5

SOURCE: TABLE 5

* The category “other civil” includes family law, probate and guardianship, and civil petitions.

FIGURE 5-General Civil Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

50

100

150

200

250

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

General Civil Filings

General Civil Dispositions

Other Civil Complaints Filed

PI, PD Motor Vehicle Filings

PI, PD Other Filings

Thousands Thousands

FIGURE 6-Other Civil Filings and Dispositions* Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Other Civil Filings

Other Civil Dispositions

Other Civil Petitions Filed

Family Law Filings

Probate and Guardianship Filings

Thousands Thousands

æ

æ

æ å

æ

å

ä

ä

æ

ä

44

Page 53: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 5 Civil Filings and Dispositions

By Type of Proceeding Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

General civil

Personal injury, death & Other Probateproperty damage civil Other and

Total Motor Eminent com- civil guardian- FamilyFiscal year civil Total Total vehicle Other domain plaints petitions ship law

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Filings1987–88 641,320 243,479 132,379 89,667 42,712 2,002 109,098 156,111 68,478 173,2521988–89 641,802 238,939 132,319 91,450 40,869 2,169 104,451 163,255 67,505 172,1031989–90 651,836 225,468 122,033 82,866 39,167 1,957 101,478 188,319 65,723 172,3261990–91 669,722 222,102 117,308 80,208 37,100 1,946 102,848 215,154 62,833 169,6331991–92 704,513 220,306 109,255 70,680 38,575 1,658 109,393 249,038 61,317 173,852

1992–93 712,006 209,899 90,711 55,487 35,224 1,244 117,944 274,491 58,144 169,4721993–94 729,955 212,897 83,531 49,495 34,036 1,572 127,794 292,680 56,894 167,4841994–95 788,173 203,710 79,592 47,554 32,038 1,232 122,886 364,611 55,729 164,1231995–96 853,676 r 200,365 r 77,480 r 47,841 r 29,639 r 1,370 r 121,515 r 429,830 r 54,065 r 169,416 r

1996–97 807,537 186,423 70,039 43,908 26,131 1,326 115,058 403,334 52,233 165,547

Dispositions excluding civil dismissals for delay in prosecution1987–88 476,169 168,144 103,475 66,137 37,338 789 63,880 98,664 62,339 147,0221988–89 504,213 189,213 118,455 75,181 43,274 1,123 69,635 105,336 62,935 146,7291989–90 535,358 202,845 129,015 81,208 47,807 1,387 72,443 116,236 60,695 155,5821990–91 531,426 202,524 126,353 83,315 43,038 1,181 74,990 124,928 58,357 145,6171991–92 596,795 222,760 137,797 96,095 41,702 2,125 82,838 157,606 60,387 156,042

1992–93 583,671 219,440 124,655 83,324 41,331 1,526 93,259 171,655 52,694 139,8821993–94 576,265 208,424 105,730 67,109 38,621 1,064 101,630 186,482 51,565 129,7941994–95 596,808 191,963 93,665 57,827 35,838 945 97,353 217,256 47,460 140,129

1995–96 603,397 r 177,052 r 78,516 r 47,955 r 30,561 r 1,049 r 97,487 r 244,892 r 46,051 r 135,402 r

1996–97 611,895 164,568 71,742 44,363 27,379 1,123 91,703 265,932 46,460 134,935

Dispositions per 100 filings 1987–88 74 69 78 74 87 39 59 63 91 851988–89 79 79 90 82 106 52 67 65 93 851989–90 82 90 106 98 122 71 71 62 92 901990–91 79 91 108 104 116 61 73 58 93 861991–92 85 101 126 136 108 128 76 63 98 90

1992–93 82 105 137 150 117 123 79 63 91 831993–94 79 98 127 136 113 68 80 64 91 771994–95 76 94 118 122 112 77 79 60 85 851995–96 71 88 101 100 103 77 80 57 85 801996–97 76 88 102 101 105 85 80 66 89 82_________(A) (B) + (H) + (I) + (J).(B) (C) + (F) + (G).(C) (D) + (E).r Revised.

45

Page 54: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts

FIGURE 7-Distribution of General Civil Dispositions*

Fiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

* For definitions of terms used in this chart, please refer to the “Superior Court Glossary” in the appendix section of this report.

SOURCE: TABLE 6

Fiscal Year 1996–97

After Trial (20,541) 12%

Before Trial-Other (144,027) 83%

Before Trial-Dism. for Delay (8,741) 5%

Fiscal Year 1995–96

After Trial (21,793) 11%

Before Trial-Other (155,259) 81%

Before Trial-Dism. for Delay (14,810) 8%

Fiscal Year 1987–88

After Trial (17,959) 7%

Before Trial-Other (150.185) 62%

Before Trial-Dism. for Delay (72,958) 30%å

ß

æ

ß

åæ

å

æ

ã

46

Page 55: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 6 Civil Dispositions by Type of Proceeding

Fiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

Before-trial dispositionsDismissals for

Fiscal Total delay in After-trialType of proceeding year dispositions prosecution Other dispositions

(A) (B) (C) (D)

All civil proceedings a 1987–88 560,199 100.0 % 84,106 15.0 % 314,159 56.1 % 161,934 28.9 %1995–96 627,122 r 100.0 23,725 r 3.8 417,739 r 66.6 185,658 r 29.61996–97 627,697 100.0 15,802 2.5 403,954 64.4 207,941 33.1

General civil a 1987–88 241,102 43.0 72,958 13.0 150,185 26.8 17,959 3.21995–96 191,862 r 30.6 14,810 r 2.4 155,259 r 24.8 21,793 r 3.51996–97 173,309 27.6 8,741 1.4 144,027 22.9 20,541 3.3

P.I., death & 1987–88 137,953 24.6 34,478 6.2 99,795 17.8 3,680 0.7 prop. damage 1995–96 86,300 r 13.8 7,784 r 1.2 74,957 r 12.0 3,559 r 0.6

1996–97 76,040 12.1 4,298 0.7 68,256 10.9 3,486 0.6

Motor vehicles 1987–88 86,577 15.5 20,440 3.6 64,227 11.5 1,910 0.31995–96 53,010 r 8.5 5,055 r 0.8 46,346 r 7.4 1,609 r 0.31996–97 46,846 7.5 2,483 0.4 42,806 6.8 1,557 0.2

Other 1987–88 51,376 9.2 14,038 2.5 35,568 6.3 1,770 0.31995–96 33,290 r 5.3 2,729 r 0.4 28,611 r 4.6 1,950 r 0.31996–97 29,194 4.7 1,815 0.3 25,450 4.1 1,929 0.3

Eminent domain 1987–88 882 0.2 93 0.0 654 0.1 135 0.01995–96 1,075 r 0.2 26 r 0.0 764 r 0.1 285 r 0.01996–97 1,141 0.2 18 0.0 951 0.2 172 0.0

Other civil complaints 1987–88 102,267 18.3 38,387 6.9 49,736 8.9 14,144 2.51995–96 104,487 r 16.7 7,000 r 1.1 79,538 r 12.7 17,949 r 2.91996–97 96,128 15.3 4,425 0.7 74,820 11.9 16,883 2.7

Probate & guardianship 1987–88 62,700 11.2 361 0.1 8,034 1.4 54,305 9.71995–96 46,972 r 7.5 921 r 0.1 10,646 r 1.7 35,405 r 5.61996–97 46,957 7.5 497 0.1 10,947 1.7 35,513 5.7

Family law 1987–88 149,825 26.7 2,879 0.5 92,688 16.5 54,258 9.71995–96 138,247 r 22.0 2,845 r 0.5 89,748 r 14.3 45,654 r 7.31996–97 137,241 21.9 2,306 0.4 89,356 14.2 45,579 7.3

Other civil petitions 1987–88 106,572 19.0 7,908 1.4 63,252 11.3 35,412 6.31995–96 250,041 r 39.9 5,149 r 0.8 162,086 r 25.8 82,806 r 13.21996–97 270,190 43.0 4,258 0.7 159,624 25.4 106,308 16.9

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (D).a Percentages may not add to total due to rounding.r Revised.

47

Page 56: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 7

Jury Trials by Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Total Personal injury Criminal Other civil proceedings a

Jury As a percent Jury As a percent Jury As a percent Jury As a percentFiscal year trials of dispositions trials of dispositions trials of dispositions trials of dispositions

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)

1987–88 7,295 2.2 % 1,259 1.2 % 5,138 4.7 % 898 0.7 %1988–89 7,904 2.1 1,463 1.2 5,386 4.3 1,055 0.81989–90 8,384 2.1 1,721 1.3 5,481 3.9 1,182 0.91990–91 8,846 2.1 2,052 1.6 5,389 3.5 1,405 1.01991–92 9,831 2.2 2,436 1.8 5,716 3.7 1,679 1.2

1992–93 9,640 2.2 2,231 1.8 5,745 3.6 1,664 1.11993–94 9,175 2.2 2,090 2.0 5,485 3.7 1,600 1.01994–95 9,313 2.4 1,809 1.9 6,175 4.1 1,329 0.91995–96 9,488 r 2.5 1,807 r 2.3 6,329 r 4.1 1,352 r 0.91996–97 9,255 2.6 1,926 2.7 5,904 4.0 1,425 1.0

_________(A) (C) + (E) + (G).(B) As a percentage of total dispositions, excluding civil dismissals for delay in prosecution.(D) As a percentage of personal injury dispositions, excluding dismissals for delay in prosecution.(F) As a percentage of criminal dispositions.(H) As a percentage of civil complaints, eminent domain, and probate and guardianship dispositions, excluding dismissals for delay in prosecution.a Includes civil complaints, eminent domain, and probate and guardianship proceedings. r Revised.

48

Page 57: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 8 SOURCE: TABLE 8 (B) + (C) (D) + (E)

SOURCE: TABLE 8 SOURCE: TABLE 8 (H) + (I)

FIGURE 9-Juvenile Dependency Filings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Juvenile Dependency Filings

Juvenile Dependency Dispositions

FIGURE 8-Juvenile Delinquency Filings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Juvenile Delinquency Filings

Juvenile Delinquency Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

FIGURE 10-Mental Health Filings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Mental Health Filings

Mental Health Dispositions

FIGURE 11-Appeals from Lower Courts Filings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7Appeals Filed

Appeals Disposed

Thousands Thousands

Thousands ThousandsThousands Thousands

49

Page 58: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 8 (J) + (K)

SOURCE: TABLE 8

FIGURE 12-Habeas Corpus Filings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Habeas Corpus Filings

Habeas Corpus Dispositions

FIGURE 13-Criminal Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Criminal FilingsCriminal Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

ThousandsThousands

50

Page 59: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 8 Noncivil Filings and Dispositions

By Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Juvenile Juvenile Appeals fromTotal delinquency dependency Mental lower courts Habeas corpus

Fiscal year noncivil Original Subsequent Original Subsequent Criminal health Civil Criminal Criminal Other(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K)

Filings1987–88 279,554 49,375 35,067 35,987 4,856 115,539 6,842 16,146 3,486 5,454 6,8021988–89 306,479 52,486 37,823 39,403 7,088 132,635 6,789 16,040 3,453 4,337 6,4251989–90 328,380 55,574 39,680 37,123 6,921 151,115 7,570 17,472 3,508 3,784 5,6331990–91 333,957 56,649 40,260 32,439 6,117 159,419 8,124 17,639 3,959 3,882 5,4691991–92 350,758 62,969 38,755 32,070 6,377 164,635 8,100 23,633 4,438 3,950 5,831

1992–93 345,899 61,143 35,891 34,444 5,990 163,432 8,032 22,932 4,166 3,977 5,8921993–94 339,394 63,816 36,508 36,644 5,386 154,959 8,252 19,635 3,956 4,082 6,1561994–95 345,428 63,965 38,611 37,295 6,547 158,923 8,464 18,351 3,461 3,944 5,8671995–96 340,241 r 65,146 r 40,528 r 34,767 r 7,834 r 153,883 r 7,616 r 16,973 r 3,556 r 4,396 r 5,542 r

1996–97 353,052 68,032 37,507 38,655 8,145 161,580 7,631 16,097 3,537 6,318 5,550

Dispositions 1987–88 258,843 47,218 29,802 34,680 4,077 108,458 5,889 14,132 3,598 5,190 5,7991988–89 277,956 46,635 31,261 36,458 5,254 125,170 5,734 14,214 3,241 4,147 5,8421989–90 296,067 48,341 33,420 36,563 5,010 140,329 6,458 14,620 3,127 3,443 4,7561990–91 310,615 50,936 34,100 33,385 4,436 152,739 6,958 16,833 3,579 3,287 4,3621991–92 313,901 53,965 31,962 29,112 4,611 155,682 6,938 19,443 4,155 3,296 4,737

1992–93 317,737 51,922 31,021 30,672 4,678 158,139 7,486 20,862 4,192 3,507 5,2581993–94 305,147 52,780 29,871 31,008 4,357 148,374 7,773 18,079 3,957 3,660 5,2881994–95 311,239 54,226 33,023 33,058 4,599 151,611 7,392 15,316 3,656 3,412 4,9461995–96 316,700 r 57,643 r 32,004 r 33,253 r 6,166 r 154,593 r 6,958 r 14,005 r 3,344 r 3,972 r 4,762 r

1996–97 305,563 58,685 30,726 30,493 4,505 148,745 6,383 12,459 3,263 5,374 4,930

Dispositions per 100 filings1987–88 93 96 85 96 84 94 86 88 103 95 851988–89 91 89 83 93 74 94 84 89 94 96 911989–90 90 87 84 98 72 93 85 84 89 91 841990–91 93 90 85 103 73 96 86 95 90 85 801991–92 89 86 82 91 72 95 86 82 94 83 81

1992–93 92 85 86 89 78 97 93 91 101 88 891993–94 90 83 82 85 81 96 94 92 100 90 861994–95 90 85 86 89 70 95 87 83 106 87 841995–96 93 88 79 96 79 100 91 83 94 90 861996–97 87 86 82 79 55 92 84 77 92 85 89

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (K).r Revised.

51

Page 60: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 9 Dispositions Before and After Trial

By Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

Fiscal Total Before-trial After-trialType of proceeding year dispositions dispositions dispositions

(A) (B) (C)

All noncivil proceedings 1987–88 258,843 135,091 52.2 % 123,752 47.8 %1995–96 316,700 r 185,886 r 58.7 130,814 r 41.31996–97 305,563 177,254 58.0 128,309 42.0

Juvenile delinquency 1987–88 77,020 13,170 17.1 63,850 82.9 1995–96 89,647 r 12,588 r 14.0 77,059 r 86.0

1996–97 89,411 13,233 14.8 76,178 85.2

Juvenile dependency 1987–88 38,757 11,363 29.3 27,394 70.7 1995–96 39,419 r 15,272 r 38.7 24,147 r 61.3

1996–97 34,998 10,480 29.9 24,518 70.1

Criminal 1987–88 108,458 100,904 93.0 7,554 7.0 1995–96 154,593 r 146,925 r 95.0 7,668 r 5.0

1996–97 148,745 141,487 95.1 7,258 4.9

Mental health 1987–88 5,889 799 13.6 5,090 86.4 1995–96 6,958 r 2,437 r 35.0 4,521 r 65.0

1996–97 6,383 2,239 35.1 4,144 64.9

Appeals (civil) from lower courts 1987–88 14,132 820 5.8 13,312 94.2 1995–96 14,005 r 1,174 r 8.4 12,831 r 91.6

1996–97 12,459 942 7.6 11,517 92.4

Appeals (criminal) from lower courts 1987–88 3,598 1,263 35.1 2,335 64.9 1995–96 3,344 r 1,191 r 35.6 2,153 r 64.4

1996–97 3,263 1,106 33.9 2,157 66.1

Habeas corpus (criminal) 1987–88 5,190 3,596 69.3 1,594 30.7 1995–96 3,972 r 3,512 r 88.4 460 r 11.6

1996–97 5,374 4,634 86.2 740 13.8

Habeas corpus (other) 1987–88 5,799 3,176 54.8 2,623 45.2 1995–96 4,762 r 2,787 r 58.5 1,975 r 41.5

1996–97 4,930 3,133 63.5 1,797 36.5

_________(A) From Table 8.r Revised.

52

Page 61: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 10 Criminal Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 and 1994–95through 1996–97

Defendants Defendants convicted of convicted of

Total or pled guilty to or pled guilty to Defendantsdefendants felony misdemeanor acquitted or

Fiscal year disposed crimes crimes dismissed (A) (B) (C) (D)

Total 1987–88 107,528 100.0 % 97,909 91.1 % 2,304 2.1 % 7,315 6.8 %

1994–95 150,368 100.0 138,029 91.8 3,316 2.2 9,023 6.0 1995–96 153,193 r 100.0 139,978 r 91.4 3,404 r 2.2 9,811 r 6.4 1996–97 147,392 100.0 134,958 91.6 3,449 2.3 8,985 6.1

Before trial 1987–88 99,974 93.0 92,348 85.9 a 1,898 1.8 b 5,728 5.3

1994–95 142,914 95.0 132,300 88.0 a 2,811 1.9 b 7,803 5.2 1995–96 145,525 r 95.0 134,129 r 87.6 a 2,824 r 1.8 b 8,572 r 5.61996–97 140,134 95.1 129,428 87.8 a 2,843 1.9 b 7,863 5.3

After court trial 1987–88 2,416 2.2 1,670 1.6 121 0.1 625 0.61994–95 1,279 0.9 967 0.6 70 0.0 242 0.21995–96 1,339 r 0.9 972 r 0.6 86 r 0.1 281 r 0.21996–97 1,354 0.9 964 0.7 94 0.1 296 0.2

After jury trial 1987–88 5,138 4.8 3,891 3.6 285 0.3 962 0.91994–95 6,175 4.1 4,762 3.2 435 0.3 978 0.71995–96 6,329 r 4.1 4,877 r 3.2 494 r 0.3 958 r 0.61996–97 5,904 4.0 4,566 3.1 512 0.3 826 0.6

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (D). Excludes cases transferred to another court. Percentages may not add to total due to roundings.Sum of (B) through (D). Excludes cases transferred to another court. Percentages may not add to total due to rounding.a Pleas of guilty.Pleas of guilty.b Pleas of guilty to lesser charges.Pleas of guilty to lesser charges.r Revised.Revised.

53

Page 62: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Superior CourtsTable 11 Total Criminal Data (All Trial Courts)

Fiscal Years 1991–92 through 1996–97

Court ofMunicipal courts a Superior courts b Appeal

Bound over and Sentenced Criminal Defendants convicted Criminal

Felony Felony guilty on felony Criminal disposi- Jury Misde- notices ofFiscal years filings dispositions pleas guilty pleas filings tions trials Felony meanor appeal

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

1991–92 243,093 219,875 164,198 — 164,711 155,726 5,716 142,495 2,672 7,250

1992–93 244,137 229,800 173,051 — 163,573 158,287 5,745 144,310 2,785 7,195

1993–94 247,589 222,164 164,877 16,655 154,666 148,254 5,485 134,746 3,255 7,317

1994–95 256,959 232,413 171,767 20,966 158,923 151,601 6,175 138,029 3,316 8,519

1995–96 245,587 r 229,815 r 169,252 r 27,805 r 153,883 r 154,593 r 6,329 r 139,978 r 3,404 r 8,733

1996–97 251,575 233,645 172,495 27,948 161,580 148,745 5,904 134,958 3,449 8,818

_________(A) Sum of felony filings in all lower courts.(B) All dispositions, including cases that will not be filed in superior court (dismissals and pleas to misdemeanors).(C) Does not include pleas to misdemeanors. Only includes dispositions that ultimately result in a superior court filing.(D) Fiscal year 1991–92 and 1992–93 data not available.a Municipal court filings and dispositions include cases processed by superior court through trial court coordination for fiscal years 1994–95 through 1996–97.b Superior court filings and dispositions include cases processed by municipal court through trial court coordination for fiscal years 1994–95 through 1996–97.r Revised.

54

Page 63: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS

Page 64: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

57

FIGURE 1-A-Nonparking Filings Per Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with One Judicial Position Fiscal Year 1996–97

977

2,457

2,607

3,510

4,028

5,083

6,588

7,258

8,248

8,859

8,902

9,010

9,796

9,846

9,949

11,602

16,422

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

Plumas Municipal **

Sierra Municipal

Mariposa Municipal

Alpine Municipal

Modoc Municipal

Trinity Municipal

Mono Municipal

Del Norte Municipal

Group Average *

Calaveras Municipal

San Benito Municipal

Lassen Municipal

State Average *

South Sacramento Municipal

Glenn Municipal

Colusa Municipal

Amador Municipal

Inyo Municipal

This group’s average of 7,258 filings is the lowest of all six groups.Many of these courts are located in rural counties and had fewer filings.This group has six of the 10 lowest average filings per judicial position in the state.

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. ** Incomplete.

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Figure 1-An

n

n

Page 65: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

58

5,064

5,820

6,582

7,551

8,359

8,557

8,944

9,010

10,059

10,828

13,805

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Tuolumne Municipal

Lake Municipal

South Butte Municipal

Group Average

Yuba Municipal

Tehama Municipal

Sutter Municipal

State Average *

Alameda Municipal

Lodi Municipal

North Butte Municipal

FIGURE 1-B-Nonparking Filings Per Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with Two Judicial Positions Fiscal Year 1996–97

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Figure 1-BThis group’s average is the second lowest at 7,551.

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.

n

Page 66: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

59

4,609

6,707

6,806

7,105

7,318

7,473

7,712

7,901

8,438

9,010

9,082

9,478

9,626

10,189

10,376

10,552

10,673

11,506

11,506

11,545

12,351

13,078

14,187

16,054

24,376

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

North Kern Municipal

Nevada Municipal

Siskiyou Municipal

Madera Municipal

Humboldt Municipal

Kings Municipal

Napa Municipal

Vallejo-Benicia Municipal

Manteca-Ripon-Escalon-Tracy Municipal

State Average *

Santa Monica Municipal

Santa Anita Municipal

Burbank Municipal

Group Average

El Dorado Municipal

Walnut Creek-DanvilleMunicipal

Culver Municipal

East Kern Municipal

Three Lakes Municipal

Livermore-Pleasanton-Dublin Municipal

South Kern Municipal

Delta Municipal

Alhambra Municipal

Malibu Municipal

Newhall Municipal

FIGURE 1-C-Nonparking Filings Per Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with Three to Four Judicial Positions Fiscal Year 1996–97

Figure 1-CNewhall Municipal, with 24,376, has the highest average of filings per judicial position.Among the six groups, this group has the largest difference (19,767) between the highest and lowest average filings per judicial position.This group’s average of 10,189 filings per judicial position is the highest of all six groups.

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 1

n

n

n

Page 67: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

60

6,546

6,904

7,580

7,792

7,981

8,088

8,302

8,533

8,940

9,010

9,017

9,265

9,413

9,481

9,609

9,656

9,892

10,057

10,593

10,966

11,518

12,064

12,068

12,898

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Berkeley-Albany Municipal

Beverly Hills Municipal

Yolo Municipal

Los Cerritos Municipal

Whittier Municipal

Shasta Municipal

Pasadena Municipal

Imperial Municipal

Santa Barbara Municipal

State Average *

Mt. Diablo Municipal

Mt. San Jacinto Municipal

Marin Municipal

Group Average

Rio Hondo Municipal

Antelope Municipal

Bay Municipal

Glendale Municipal

Fremont-Newark-Union CityMunicipal

San Luis Obispo Municipal

Northern Solano Municipal

Placer Municipal

Merced Municipal

Pomona Municipal

This group’s average of 9,481 filings per judicial position is the second highest of all six groups.

Figure 1-D

FIGURE 1-D-Nonparking Filings Per Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with Five to Six Judicial Positions Fiscal Year 1996–97

SOURCE: TABLE 1* Excludes courts with incomplete data.

n

Page 68: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

61

2,946

6,300

6,719

7,321

7,753

8,035

8,215

8,387

8,451

8,549

8,581

8,734

8,989

9,010

9,255

9,255

9,256

10,433

11,425

12,221

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Mendocino Municipal

Central Valley Municipal

North Santa BarbaraMunicipal

Tulare Municipal

Santa Cruz Municipal

East Los AngelesMunicipal

Southeast Municipal

San Leandro-HaywardMunicipal

Inglewood Municipal

South Bay Municipal

Group Average

Downey Municipal

Stockton Municipal

State Average *

Sonoma Municipal

Stanislaus Municipal

Orange County HarborMunicipal

Desert Municipal

Citrus Municipal

South Orange Municipal

FIGURE 1-E-Nonparking FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with Seven to Ten Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

One of the 10 courts with the highest filings per authorized judicial position is in this group.

Figure 1-E

SOURCE: TABLE 1 * Excludes courts with incomplete data.

n

Page 69: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

62

6,096

6,619

6,843

6,940

7,104

7,702

7,877

8,263

8,520

8,843

8,892

9,010

9,189

9,217

9,643

9,687

10,572

10,791

10,902

11,062

11,117

11,515

11,879

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Oakland-Piedmont-EmeryvilleMunicipal

San Diego Municipal

San Francisco Municipal

Compton Municipal

Bakersfield Municipal

Monterey Municipal

El Cajon Municipal

Central Orange Municipal

Los Angeles Municipal

Santa Clara Municipal

Group Average

State Average *

Fresno Municipal

South Bay Municipal

Sacramento Municipal

Western Riverside Municipal

West Orange Municipal

Long Beach Municipal

San Mateo Municipal

North County Municipal

Ventura Municipal

San Bernardino Municipal

North Orange Municipal

FIGURE 1-F-Nonparking FilingsPer Authorized Judicial Position

Municipal Courts with Eleven or More Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

Figure 1-F

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Among the six groups, this group has the smallest difference between the highest and lowest average filings per judicial position (5,783).

n

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.

Page 70: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts Table 1 Nonparking Filings and

Cases Awaiting Trial per Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases awaiting trialJudicial Per Total Perpositions judicial as of judicial

County/Court as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 854.8 7,705,523 9,010 a — 105,851 129 b —

Alameda County 43.0 341,700 7,947 — 2,629 61 —Alameda Municipal 2.0 20,117 10,059 32 130 65 72Berkeley-Albany Municipal 5.0 32,729 6,546 96 296 59 76Fremont-Newark-Union City Municipal 6.0 63,556 10,593 27 600 100 46Livermore-Pleasanton-Dublin Municipal 4.0 46,180 11,545 14 409 102 44Oakland-Piedmont-Emeryville Municipal 17.0 103,636 6,096 98 807 47 83San Leandro-Hayward Municipal 9.0 75,482 8,387 66 387 43 88

Alpine CountyAlpine Municipal 1.0 2,607 2,607 106 6 6 101

Amador County Amador Municipal 1.0 11,602 11,602 13 26 26 96

Butte County 4.0 40,774 10,194 — 328 82 — North Butte Municipal 2.0 27,610 13,805 5 141 71 68 South Butte Municipal 2.0 13,164 6,582 95 187 94 52Calaveras County

Calaveras Municipal 1.0 8,248 8,248 70 75 75 64Colusa County Colusa Municipal 1.0 9,949 9,949 34 61 61 74

Contra Costa County 18.0 185,875 10,326 d — 3,622 201 —Bay Municipal 6.0 59,352 9,892 35 1,564 261 2Delta Municipal 3.0 39,233 13,078 6 685 228 4Mt. Diablo Municipal 5.0 45,083 9,017 52 692 138 25Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal 4.0 42,207 10,552 29 681 170 14

Contra Costa Superior c — 0 — — — — —Del Norte County

Del Norte Municipal 1.0 6,588 6,588 94 — i — —El Dorado County El Dorado Municipal 3.0 31,129 10,376 31 358 119 34

Fresno County 20.0 160,669 8,033 — 1,032 i 86 —

Central Valley Municipal 8.0 50,403 6,300 97 — i — — Fresno Municipal 12.0 110,266 9,189 50 1,032 86 59Glenn County Glenn Municipal 1.0 9,846 9,846 36 50 50 81Humboldt County Humboldt Municipal 4.0 29,272 7,318 84 447 112 38Imperial County Imperial Municipal 5.8 49,493 8,533 62 430 74 65Inyo County

Inyo Municipal 1.0 16,422 16,422 2 146 146 21

Kern County 21.0 168,152 8,007 — 1,175 56 —Bakersfield Municipal 11.0 78,148 7,104 86 780 71 67East Kern Municipal 3.0 34,517 11,506 18 61 20 97North Kern Municipal 4.0 18,434 4,609 102 126 32 93South Kern Municipal 3.0 37,053 12,351 8 208 69 71

Kings County Kings Municipal 4.0 29,891 7,473 82 198 50 82

63

Page 71: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts Table 1 Nonparking Filings and

Cases Awaiting Trial per Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases awaiting trialJudicial Per Total Perpositions judicial as of judicial

County/Court as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 854.8 7,705,523 9,010 a — 105,851 129 b —

Lake CountyLake Municipal 2.0 11,640 5,820 99 88 44 87

Lassen County Lassen Municipal 1.0 8,902 8,902 56 65 65 72

Los Angeles County 259.0 2,384,350 9,206 — 41,906 162 —Alhambra Municipal 4.0 56,746 14,187 4 890 223 5Antelope Municipal 6.0 57,938 9,656 39 735 123 33Beverly Hills Municipal 5.0 34,519 6,904 88 660 132 28Burbank Municipal 3.0 28,877 9,626 41 393 131 29Citrus Municipal 10.0 114,254 11,425 19 984 98 49Compton Municipal 14.0 97,154 6,940 87 1,578 113 37Culver Municipal 3.0 32,020 10,673 26 280 93 53Downey Municipal 7.0 61,136 8,734 59 574 82 61East Los Angeles Municipal 7.0 56,246 8,035 73 724 103 43Glendale Municipal 5.0 50,284 10,057 33 940 188 9Inglewood Municipal 8.0 67,604 8,451 64 1,018 127 31Long Beach Municipal 13.0 140,286 10,791 25 1,509 116 36Los Angeles Municipal 112.0 954,216 8,520 63 24,615 220 6Los Cerritos Municipal 5.0 38,960 7,792 77 540 108 42Malibu Municipal 3.0 48,161 16,054 3 524 175 12Newhall Municipal 3.0 73,129 24,376 1 639 213 7Pasadena Municipal 6.0 49,809 8,302 68 900 150 20Pomona Municipal 6.0 77,387 12,898 7 665 111 39Rio Hondo Municipal 6.0 57,651 9,609 42 599 100 47Santa Anita Municipal 3.0 28,435 9,478 43 330 110 40Santa Monica Municipal 4.0 36,327 9,082 51 664 166 15South Bay Municipal 11.0 101,389 9,217 49 888 81 62Southeast Municipal 9.0 73,939 8,215 71 542 60 75Whittier Municipal 6.0 47,883 7,981 74 715 119 35

Madera County

Madera Municipal 4.0 28,419 7,105 85 191 i — —Marin County

Marin Municipal 6.0 56,479 9,413 44 1,162 194 8Mariposa County

Mariposa Municipal 1.0 2,457 2,457 107 — i — —Mendocino County

Mendocino Municipal 7.0 20,625 2,946 105 386 55 78Merced County

Merced Municipal 5.0 60,338 12,068 10 505 101 45Modoc County

Modoc Municipal 1.0 3,510 3,510 104 30 30 94Mono County

Mono Municipal 1.0 5,083 5,083 100 19 19 98

Monterey County 86,400 7,702 d — 1,008 92 —Monterey Municipal 11.0 84,723 7,702 80 1,008 92 54

Monterey Superior c — 1,677 — — — — —

64

Page 72: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts Table 1 Nonparking Filings and

Cases Awaiting Trial per Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases awaiting trialJudicial Per Total Perpositions judicial as of judicial

County/Court as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 854.8 7,705,523 9,010 a — 105,851 129 b —

Napa County

Napa Municipal 3.0 23,135 7,712 79 — i — —Nevada County

Nevada Municipal 3.0 20,122 6,707 92 209 70 70

Orange County 62.0 643,420 10,378 — 8,386 135 —Central Orange Municipal 15.0 123,940 8,263 69 1,647 110 41North Orange Municipal 16.0 190,064 11,879 12 2,421 151 19Orange County Harbor Municipal 10.0 92,564 9,256 46 891 89 58South Orange Municipal 9.0 109,986 12,221 9 1,688 188 10West Orange Municipal 12.0 126,866 10,572 28 1,739 145 22

Placer CountyPlacer Municipal 5.0 60,322 12,064 11 455 91 55

Plumas CountyPlumas Municipal 1.0 3,659 i — — 36 36 90

Riverside County 32.0 320,696 10,022 — 3,082 i 96 i —Desert Municipal 8.0 83,463 10,433 30 776 97 50

Mt. San Jacinto Municipal 6.0 55,592 9,265 45 — i — —

Three Lakes Municipal 4.0 46,023 11,506 17 — i — —Western Riverside Municipal 14.0 135,618 9,687 38 2,306 165 16

Sacramento County 23.0 221,939 9,650 — 1,985 i 86 i —

Sacramento Municipal 22.0 212,143 9,643 40 1,955 i — —South Sacramento Municipal 1.0 9,796 9,796 37 30 30 94

San Benito CountySan Benito Municipal 1.0 8,859 8,859 57 46 46 86

San Bernardino CountySan Bernardino Municipal 34.0 391,497 11,515 16 4,546 134 26

San Diego County 71.0 564,597 7,952 — 9,008 127 —El Cajon Municipal 12.0 94,522 7,877 76 1,084 90 57North County Municipal 14.0 154,866 11,062 21 1,786 128 30San Diego Municipal 36.0 238,269 6,619 93 5,484 152 18South Bay Municipal 9.0 76,940 8,549 61 654 73 66

San Francisco County 164,296 6,843 d — 7,222 301 —San Francisco Municipal 24.0 164,232 6,843 89 7,222 301 1

San Francisco Superior c — 64 — — — — —

San Joaquin County 14.0 132,882 9,094 d — 2,099 150 —Lodi Municipal 2.0 21,656 10,828 24 267 134 27Manteca-Ripon-Escalon-Tracy Municipal 4.0 33,751 8,438 65 720 180 11Stockton Municipal 8.0 71,914 8,989 53 1,112 139 24

San Joaquin Superior c — 5,561 — — — — —San Luis Obispo County

San Luis Obispo Municipal 6.0 65,794 10,966 22 281 47 84San Mateo County

San Mateo Municipal 14.0 152,634 10,902 23 1,274 91 55

65

Page 73: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts Table 1 Nonparking Filings and

Cases Awaiting Trial per Judicial PositionFiscal Year 1996–97

Filings Cases awaiting trialJudicial Per Total Perpositions judicial as of judicial

County/Court as of 6/30/97 Total position Rank a 6/30/97 position Rank b

(A) (B) (C)

Statewide 854.8 7,705,523 9,010 a — 105,851 129 b —

Santa Barbara County 13.0 100,671 7,744 — 565 43 —North Santa Barbara Municipal 7.0 47,033 6,719 91 326 47 85Santa Barbara Municipal 6.0 53,638 8,940 55 239 40 89

Santa Clara CountySanta Clara Municipal 40.0 353,712 8,843 58 2,788 70 69

Santa Cruz CountySanta Cruz Municipal 7.0 54,273 7,753 78 407 58 77

Shasta CountyShasta Municipal 5.0 40,442 8,088 72 498 100 48

Sierra CountySierra Municipal 1.0 977 977 108 11 11 99

Siskiyou CountySiskiyou Municipal 3.0 20,419 6,806 90 96 32 92

Solano County 10.0 100,710 10,071 — 553 55 —Northern Solano Municipal 6.0 69,106 11,518 15 54 9 100Vallejo-Benicia Municipal 4.0 31,604 7,901 75 499 125 32

Sonoma CountySonoma Municipal 9.0 83,293 9,255 48 1,412 157 17

Stanislaus County 83,297 9,255 d — 721 80 —Stanislaus Municipal 9.0 83,297 9,255 47 721 80 63

Stanislaus Superior c — 0 — — — — —Sutter County

Sutter Municipal 2.0 17,888 8,944 54 191 96 51Tehama County

Tehama Municipal 2.0 17,114 8,557 60 168 84 60Trinity County

Trinity Municipal 1.0 4,028 4,028 103 33 33 91

Tulare County 75,160 7,321 d — 525 53 —Tulare Municipal 10.0 73,211 7,321 83 525 53 80

Tulare Superior c — 1,949 — — — — —Tuolumne County

Tuolumne Municipal 2.0 10,127 5,064 101 110 55 79Ventura County

Ventura Municipal 13.0 144,522 11,117 20 1,828 141 23Yolo County

Yolo Municipal 5.0 37,901 7,580 81 867 173 13Yuba County

Yuba Municipal 2.0 16,717 8,359 67 506 253 3

_________(A) Judicial positions include court commissioners and referees in addition to the number of judges authorized for the court.(C) Includes criminal (nonparking) and civil cases set for trial, and civil cases in which a memorandum to set has been filed but no trial date has been assigned.

Excludes small claims cases.a Excludes courts missing data on filings; also excludes superior court coordination data.b Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trial.c Superior court that handles municipal court filings through trial court coordination.d Excludes superior court filings through trial court coordination.i Incomplete.

66

Page 74: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

67

1,260

1,970

2,220

3,254

3,340

5,583

6,400

6,803

6,908

7,168

8,112

8,343

8,387

9,237

9,581

10,706

15,775

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

Plumas Municipal **

Sierra Municipal

Alpine Municipal

Mariposa Municipal

Modoc Municipal

Trinity Municipal

Mono Municipal

Amador Municipal

Glenn Municipal

Group Average *

Calaveras Municipal

San Benito Municipal

State Average *

Colusa Municipal

South Sacramento Municipal

Del Norte Municipal

Lassen Municipal

Inyo Municipal

* Excludes courts with incomplete data.* * Incomplete.

Figure 2-AThis group’s average dispositions per judicial position equivalent (6,908) is the lowest among all six groups.Five of the 10 courts with the lowest average dispositions per judicial position equivalent are in this group.Inyo Municipal, with 15,775, has the second-highest number of dispositions per judicial position equivalent in the state. SOURCE: TABLE 2

FIGURE 2-A-Nonparking Dispositions Per Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with One Judicial Position Fiscal Year 1996–97

n

n

n

Page 75: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

68

4,605

4,943

5,572

5,642

7,913

8,281

8,343

8,491

8,595

9,277

10,427

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Tuolumne Municipal

Lake Municipal

Yuba Municipal

South Butte Municipal

Sutter Municipal

Group Average

State Average *

Tehama Municipal

Lodi Municipal

Alameda Municipal

North Butte Municipal

FIGURE 2-B-Nonparking DispositionsPer Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with Two Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

Figure 2-BOne of the 10 courts with the lowest average dispositions per judicial position equivalent is in this group.The group average of 8,281 is closest to the state average.

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 2

n

n

Page 76: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

69

3,763

4,382

4,850

5,841

6,095

6,362

6,740

7,204

7,356

7,366

7,934

8,343

8,789

8,943

8,991

9,187

9,191

9,803

9,943

10,371

10,387

14,032

14,037

14,540

16,889

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

North Kern Municipal

Nevada Municipal

Siskiyou Municipal

Madera Municipal

Napa Municipal

Humboldt Municipal

El Dorado Municipal

Vallejo-Benicia Municipal

Kings Municipal

Manteca-Ripon-Escalon-TracyMunicipal

Santa Monica Municipal

State Average *

Group Average

Burbank Municipal

Santa Anita Municipal

Three Lakes Municipal

Culver Municipal

Delta Municipal

Livermore-Pleasanton-DublinMunicipal

East Kern Municipal

Walnut Creek-DanvilleMunicipal

Alhambra Municipal

Malibu Municipal

South Kern Municipal

Newhall Municipal

FIGURE 2-C-Nonparking DispositionsPer Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with Three to Four Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

Figure 2-CFour of the 10 courts with the highest average dispositions per judicial position equivalent are in this group.This group’s average of 8,789 is the highest among all six groups.

SOURCE: TABLE 2 * Excludes courts with incomplete data.

n

n

Page 77: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

70

5,492

5,993

6,137

6,252

7,069

7,262

7,367

8,109

8,343

8,387

8,439

8,635

8,653

8,909

9,136

9,170

9,277

9,387

10,056

10,450

10,489

10,832

11,118

11,223

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Yolo Municipal

Berkeley-Albany Municipal

Los Cerritos Municipal

Imperial Municipal

Santa Barbara Municipal

Beverly Hills Municipal

Whittier Municipal

Pasadena Municipal

State Average *

Rio Hondo Municipal

Glendale Municipal

Group Average

Mt. Diablo Municipal

Bay Municipal

Mt. San Jacinto Municipal

Antelope Municipal

Shasta Municipal

Marin Municipal

Fremont-Newark-Union CityMunicipal

Merced Municipal

Placer Municipal

Pomona Municipal

San Luis Obispo Municipal

Northern Solano Municipal

Figure 2-DThis group’s average is the second highest (8,635) among all six groups.

Figure 2-D-Nonparking DispositionsPer Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with Five to Six Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 2

n

Page 78: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

71

3,641

5,609

6,819

6,844

7,083

7,117

7,814

7,881

8,127

8,211

8,249

8,276

8,343

8,398

8,795

8,850

9,664

10,262

10,275

11,551

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Mendocino Municipal

Central Valley Municipal

Southeast Municipal

Tulare Municipal

Inglewood Municipal

Santa Cruz Municipal

North Santa BarbaraMunicipal

South Bay Municipal

Downey Municipal

Group Average

Stanislaus Municipal

San Leandro-HaywardMunicipal

State Average *

Stockton Municipal

Sonoma Municipal

East Los Angeles Municipal

Orange County HarborMunicipal

Desert Municipal

Citrus Municipal

South Orange Municipal

FIGURE 2-E-Nonparking DispositionsPer Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with Seven to Ten Judicial PositionsFiscal Year 1996–97

This group’s average is the second lowest (8,211) among all six groups.

Figure 2-E

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 2

n

Page 79: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

72

5,394

6,243

6,261

6,482

6,966

7,143

7,310

7,666

7,809

8,031

8,173

8,187

8,298

8,308

8,343

8,947

9,107

9,720

10,302

10,328

10,692

11,148

12,462

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Oakland-Piedmont-EmeryvilleMunicipal

San Diego Municipal

San Francisco Municipal

Bakersfield Municipal

Compton Municipal

El Cajon Municipal

Monterey Municipal

Fresno Municipal

Sacramento Municipal

Western Riverside Municipal

Los Angeles Municipal

Santa Clara Municipal

San Mateo Municipal

Group Average

State Average *

South Bay Municipal

Ventura Municipal

West Orange Municipal

North County Municipal

Central Orange Municipal

Long Beach Municipal

San Bernardino Municipal

North Orange Municipal

Figure 2-FThis group’s average dispositions per judicial position equivalent (8,308) is slightly below the state average.Two of the 10 courts with the highest dispositions per judicial position equivalent are in this group.

FIGURE 2-F-Nonparking Dispositions Per Judicial Position Equivalent

Municipal Courts with Eleven or More Judicial Positions Fiscal Year 1996–97

* Excludes courts with incomplete data. SOURCE: TABLE 2

n

n

Page 80: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 2 Nonparking Dispositions, Contested

Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trials

Judicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position position

County/Court FY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

(A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 903.5 7,544,617 8,343 a — 337,464 373 a — 6,346 7 a —

Alameda County 44.9 329,132 7,330 — 12,965 289 — 180 4 — Alameda Municipal 2.1 19,481 9,277 31 1,168 556 11 3 1 100 Berkeley-Albany Municipal 5.0 29,967 5,993 90 1,191 238 86 26 5 63 Fremont-Newark-Union City Municipal 6.5 65,364 10,056 23 2,572 396 40 26 4 80 Livermore-Pleasanton-Dublin Municipal 4.3 42,753 9,943 24 1,254 292 71 10 2 94 Oakland-Piedmont-Emeryville Municipal 18.0 97,085 5,394 97 3,694 205 94 75 4 78 San Leandro-Hayward Municipal 9.0 74,482 8,276 52 3,086 343 53 40 4 74Alpine County Alpine Municipal 0.8 1,576 1,970 107 5 6 108 1 1 101Amador County Amador Municipal 1.1 7,040 6,400 83 187 170 99 17 15 4Butte County 4.2 34,223 8,148 — 1,389 331 — 19 5 — North Butte Municipal 2.2 22,939 10,427 16 891 405 37 18 8 39 South Butte Municipal 2.0 11,284 5,642 92 498 249 84 1 1 105Calaveras County Calaveras Municipal 1.1 7,885 7,168 72 496 451 20 11 10 22Colusa County Colusa Municipal 1.0 8,387 8,387 50 170 170 99 7 7 46

Contra Costa County 19.6 185,497 9,327 c — 13,938 711 c — 194 10 c — Bay Municipal 6.5 57,909 8,909 41 4,990 768 3 69 11 17 Delta Municipal 3.7 36,271 9,803 25 2,514 679 6 37 10 22 Mt. Diablo Municipal 5.2 44,993 8,653 44 2,920 562 10 21 4 79 Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal 4.2 43,627 10,387 17 3,503 834 2 60 14 6

Contra Costa Superior b — 2,697 — — 11 — — 7 — —Del Norte County Del Norte Municipal 1.1 10,539 9,581 28 470 427 27 4 4 83El Dorado County El Dorado Municipal 4.3 28,980 6,740 81 1,820 423 28 35 8 40Fresno County 20.7 142,022 6,861 — 5,621 272 — 78 4 — Central Valley Municipal 8.1 45,430 5,609 93 782 97 106 30 4 82 Fresno Municipal 12.6 96,592 7,666 65 4,839 384 42 48 4 81Glenn County Glenn Municipal 1.1 7,483 6,803 80 278 253 82 2 2 97Humboldt County Humboldt Municipal 4.0 25,449 6,362 84 906 227 93 62 16 3

73

Page 81: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 2 Nonparking Dispositions, Contested

Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trials

Judicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position position

County/Court FY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

(A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 903.5 7,544,617 8,343 a — 337,464 373 a — 6,346 7 a —

Imperial County Imperial Municipal 6.3 39,390 6,252 86 1,181 187 95 12 2 96Inyo County Inyo Municipal 1.0 15,775 15,775 2 513 513 13 1 1 103

Kern County 20.9 156,915 7,508 — 8,172 391 — 152 7 — Bakersfield Municipal 11.1 71,948 6,482 82 2,940 265 77 134 12 8 East Kern Municipal 3.2 33,188 10,371 18 967 302 64 5 2 98 North Kern Municipal 4.1 15,429 3,763 102 721 176 96 2 0 106 South Kern Municipal 2.5 36,350 14,540 3 3,544 1,418 1 11 4 75Kings County Kings Municipal 4.1 30,160 7,356 68 959 234 91 46 11 13Lake County Lake Municipal 2.1 10,381 4,943 98 361 172 98 6 3 90Lassen County Lassen Municipal 0.8 8,565 10,706 12 528 660 7 10 13 7Los Angeles County 282.1 2,427,697 8,606 — 119,638 424 — 2,238 8 — Alhambra Municipal 4.2 58,936 14,032 5 3,005 715 4 37 9 32 Antelope Municipal 6.6 60,520 9,170 35 2,677 406 36 53 8 41 Beverly Hills Municipal 5.2 37,763 7,262 70 1,630 313 60 44 8 36 Burbank Municipal 3.4 30,407 8,943 40 1,375 404 38 21 6 57 Citrus Municipal 11.1 114,055 10,275 21 4,981 449 22 159 14 5 Compton Municipal 14.0 97,526 6,966 77 2,297 164 101 167 12 10 Culver Municipal 3.4 31,248 9,191 33 1,194 351 50 28 8 38 Downey Municipal 7.5 60,949 8,127 56 2,872 383 43 81 11 16 East Los Angeles Municipal 7.3 64,602 8,850 42 2,092 287 74 50 7 47 Glendale Municipal 6.1 51,478 8,439 47 2,187 359 48 56 9 29 Inglewood Municipal 9.5 67,286 7,083 75 4,149 437 25 45 5 69 Long Beach Municipal 12.6 134,722 10,692 13 3,936 312 61 81 6 54 Los Angeles Municipal 122.3 999,606 8,173 55 60,798 497 16 858 7 45 Los Cerritos Municipal 5.9 36,207 6,137 88 1,637 277 75 30 5 65 Malibu Municipal 3.3 46,323 14,037 4 1,971 597 9 17 5 64 Newhall Municipal 4.2 70,935 16,889 1 2,556 609 8 48 11 12 Pasadena Municipal 6.7 54,328 8,109 58 2,984 445 23 29 4 77 Pomona Municipal 6.9 74,744 10,832 11 2,679 388 41 80 12 11 Rio Hondo Municipal 6.6 55,357 8,387 49 2,147 325 57 69 10 20 Santa Anita Municipal 3.3 29,669 8,991 38 975 295 68 11 3 86 Santa Monica Municipal 4.4 34,908 7,934 60 1,756 399 39 39 9 31 South Bay Municipal 11.5 102,891 8,947 39 4,191 364 45 95 8 37 Southeast Municipal 9.8 66,826 6,819 79 2,950 301 65 86 9 33 Whittier Municipal 6.3 46,411 7,367 66 2,599 413 30 54 9 35Madera County Madera Municipal 4.1 23,948 5,841 91 1,305 318 58 13 3 87

74

Page 82: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 2 Nonparking Dispositions, Contested

Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trials

Judicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position position

County/Court FY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

(A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 903.5 7,544,617 8,343 a — 337,464 373 a — 6,346 7 a —

Marin County Marin Municipal 6.0 56,319 9,387 29 4,149 692 5 101 17 2Mariposa County Mariposa Municipal 0.8 1,776 2,220 106 126 158 102 0 0 107Mendocino County Mendocino Municipal 5.4 19,662 3,641 103 933 173 97 17 3 88Merced County Merced Municipal 5.3 55,386 10,450 15 1,904 359 47 13 2 93Modoc County Modoc Municipal 0.8 2,603 3,254 105 121 151 104 7 9 34Mono County Mono Municipal 1.0 5,583 5,583 94 263 263 79 2 2 95

Monterey County 81,925 7,310 c — 2,893 250 c — 99 9 c — Monterey Municipal 11.0 80,408 7,310 69 2,749 250 83 98 9 30

Monterey Superior b — 1,517 — — 144 — — 1 — —Napa County Napa Municipal 3.6 21,943 6,095 89 1,032 287 73 23 6 55Nevada County Nevada Municipal 3.9 17,089 4,382 101 916 235 90 37 9 26Orange County 63.8 691,080 10,832 — 24,369 382 — 595 9 — Central Orange Municipal 14.9 153,880 10,328 19 3,891 261 80 101 7 48 North Orange Municipal 16.5 205,631 12,462 6 6,780 411 33 164 10 24 Orange County Harbor Municipal 10.2 98,570 9,664 27 4,196 411 32 107 10 19 South Orange Municipal 9.4 108,580 11,551 7 4,233 450 21 98 10 21 West Orange Municipal 12.8 124,419 9,720 26 5,269 412 31 125 10 25Placer County Placer Municipal 5.5 57,692 10,489 14 2,495 454 19 30 5 60Plumas County

Plumas Municipal 1.0 i 2,684 i — — 86 i — — 2 i — —Riverside County 33.7 300,215 8,908 — 12,331 366 — 143 4 — Desert Municipal 8.1 83,120 10,262 22 3,759 464 18 53 7 52 Mt. San Jacinto Municipal 5.8 52,990 9,136 36 775 134 105 15 3 92 Three Lakes Municipal 4.4 40,422 9,187 34 1,483 337 54 23 5 62 Western Riverside Municipal 15.4 123,683 8,031 59 6,314 410 35 52 3 85Sacramento County 25.3 199,004 7,866 — 10,703 423 — 164 6 — Sacramento Municipal 24.3 189,767 7,809 64 10,194 420 29 163 7 50 South Sacramento Municipal 1.0 9,237 9,237 32 509 509 14 1 1 103San Benito County San Benito Municipal 1.0 8,112 8,112 57 363 363 46 18 18 1

75

Page 83: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 2 Nonparking Dispositions, Contested

Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trials

Judicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position position

County/Court FY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

(A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 903.5 7,544,617 8,343 a — 337,464 373 a — 6,346 7 a —

San Bernardino County San Bernardino Municipal 35.3 393,530 11,148 9 15,450 438 24 179 5 66San Diego County 74.5 550,538 7,390 — 28,379 381 — 615 8 — El Cajon Municipal 12.4 88,577 7,143 73 3,717 300 66 99 8 42 North County Municipal 14.5 149,382 10,302 20 7,711 532 12 174 12 9 San Diego Municipal 38.2 238,501 6,243 87 12,875 337 55 253 7 51 South Bay Municipal 9.4 74,078 7,881 62 4,076 434 26 89 9 27

San Francisco County 162,832 6,261 c — 6,143 236 c — 175 7 c — San Francisco Municipal 26.0 162,787 6,261 85 6,143 236 88 175 7 49

San Francisco Superior b — 45 — — 0 — — 0 — —San Joaquin County 14.4 121,239 8,134 c — 4,671 324 c — 103 7 c — Lodi Municipal 2.2 18,910 8,595 45 741 337 56 10 5 71 Manteca-Ripon-Escalon-Tracy Municipal 4.1 30,202 7,366 67 1,437 350 51 18 4 76 Stockton Municipal 8.1 68,024 8,398 48 2,493 308 63 75 9 28

San Joaquin Superior b — 4,103 — — 0 — — 0 — —San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo Municipal 6.0 66,710 11,118 10 1,897 316 59 32 5 61San Mateo County San Mateo Municipal 16.7 138,571 8,298 51 4,924 295 69 100 6 59Santa Barbara County 12.6 93,762 7,441 — 3,106 247 — 68 5 — North Santa Barbara Municipal 6.3 49,230 7,814 63 1,610 256 81 19 3 89 Santa Barbara Municipal 6.3 44,532 7,069 76 1,496 237 87 49 8 43Santa Clara County Santa Clara Municipal 40.9 334,853 8,187 54 11,030 270 76 116 3 91Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz Municipal 7.3 51,956 7,117 74 2,545 349 52 47 6 53Shasta County Shasta Municipal 5.0 46,387 9,277 30 1,879 376 44 31 6 56Sierra County Sierra Municipal 0.7 882 1,260 108 56 80 107 0 0 107Siskiyou County Siskiyou Municipal 3.2 15,519 4,850 99 997 312 62 11 3 84Solano County 10.0 96,153 9,615 — 3,587 359 — 56 6 — Northern Solano Municipal 6.0 67,337 11,223 8 1,725 288 72 27 5 72 Vallejo-Benicia Municipal 4.0 28,816 7,204 71 1,862 466 17 29 7 44Sonoma County Sonoma Municipal 9.1 80,038 8,795 43 2,718 299 67 45 5 68

Stanislaus County 80,782 8,249 c — 3,556 353 c — 95 6 c — Stanislaus Municipal 9.5 78,365 8,249 53 3,358 353 49 58 6 58

Stanislaus Superior b — 2,417 — — 198 — — 37 — —

76

Page 84: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 2 Nonparking Dispositions, Contested

Trials, and Jury Trials per Judicial Position EquivalentFiscal Year 1996–97

Dispositions Contested trials Jury trials

Judicial Per Per Perposition judicial judicial judicial

equivalents position position position

County/Court FY 1996–97 Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a Total equivalent Rank a

(A) (B) (C) (D)

Statewide 903.5 7,544,617 8,343 a — 337,464 373 a — 6,346 7 a —

Sutter County Sutter Municipal 2.0 15,826 7,913 61 1,010 505 15 3 2 99Tehama County Tehama Municipal 1.9 16,133 8,491 46 502 264 78 2 1 102Trinity County Trinity Municipal 1.0 3,340 3,340 104 154 154 103 5 5 67

Tulare County 70,666 6,844 c — 3,038 295 c — 113 11 c — Tulare Municipal 10.1 69,125 6,844 78 2,977 295 70 110 11 15

Tulare Superior b — 1,541 — — 61 — — 3 — —Tuolumne County Tuolumne Municipal 2.0 9,210 4,605 100 471 236 89 22 11 14Ventura County Ventura Municipal 14.7 133,872 9,107 37 6,037 411 34 156 11 18Yolo County Yolo Municipal 5.2 28,557 5,492 96 1,267 244 85 24 5 70Yuba County Yuba Municipal 2.0 11,144 5,572 95 461 231 92 9 4.5 72

_________(A) Reflects authorized judicial positions adjusted for assistance rendered by the court and assistance received by the court from assigned judges, temporary judges, commissioners, and referees. Components may not add to total due to rounding.a Excludes courts missing data on dispositions; also excludes superior court coordination data.b Superior court that handles municipal court dispositions through trial court coordination.c Excludes superior court dispositions through trial court coordination.i Incomplete.

77

Page 85: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 3 Numbers of Courts and Judges

As of June 30, 1988 through 1997

Municipal courts Justice courtsJudicial

Number Authorized Judicial position Numberof courts judgeships positions equivalents of courts Judges

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

As of June 30,

1988 88 566 695 709 76 761989 88 605 737 727 65 661990 92 614 748 775 57 571991 90 616 772 788 53 531992 90 617 779 829 53 53

1993 a 138 670 841 877 — —1994 129 670 844 877 — —1995 110 670 848 889 — —1996 109 670 848 898 — —1997 109 675 855 904 — —

_________(C) Judicial positions include judges, permanent commissioners, and referees.(D) Reflects authorized judicial positions adjusted for vacancies, assistance rendered by the court,

and assistance received by the court from assigned judges, temporary judges, commissioners, and referees.a As of 1993, municipal and justice court data were combined. As of January 1, 1995, justice courts became municipal courts pursuant to

passage of Proposition 191.

78

Page 86: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 4 Nonparking Filings and Dispositions

By Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

CivilSmall

Fiscal year Total Criminal Total claims Other(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

Filings1987–88 9,911,636 8,791,672 1,119,964 527,708 592,2561988–89 9,936,122 8,800,425 1,135,697 518,983 616,7141989–90 10,239,421 9,103,486 1,135,935 504,050 631,8851990–91 10,092,467 8,940,768 1,151,699 515,364 636,3351991–92 9,475,890 8,294,246 1,181,644 548,339 633,305

1992–93 8,746,236 7,663,269 1,082,967 498,660 584,3071993–94 8,262,080 7,254,661 1,007,419 446,761 560,6581994–95 7,768,954 6,763,719 1,005,235 432,897 572,3381995–96 7,872,482 r 6,894,521 r 977,961 r 430,991 r 546,970 r

1996–97 7,705,523 6,718,366 987,157 428,936 558,221

Dispositions1987–88 8,548,400 7,718,972 829,428 375,490 453,9381988–89 8,564,126 7,716,321 847,805 369,469 478,3361989–90 8,998,700 8,132,957 865,743 364,917 500,8261990–91 9,087,807 8,104,734 983,073 400,494 582,5791991–92 9,131,981 7,933,582 1,198,399 472,770 725,629

1992–93 8,201,415 7,082,404 1,119,011 465,725 653,2861993–94 7,856,479 6,807,492 1,048,987 408,424 640,5631994–95 7,616,182 6,570,146 1,046,036 417,100 628,9361995–96 7,671,644 r 6,690,988 r 980,656 r 409,534 r 571,122 r

1996–97 7,544,617 6,539,736 1,004,881 420,327 584,554

Dispositions per 100 filings1987–88 86 88 74 71 771988–89 86 88 75 71 781989–90 88 89 76 72 791990–91 90 91 85 78 921991–92 96 96 101 86 115

1992–93 94 92 103 93 1121993–94 95 94 104 91 1141994–95 98 97 104 96 1101995–96 97 97 100 95 1041996–97 98 97 102 98 105_________(A) (B) + (C).(C) (D) + (E).r Revised.

79

Page 87: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 4

SOURCE: TABLE 4

FIGURE 3-Other Civil Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Other Civil Filings

Other Civil Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

æ

ã

FIGURE 4-Small Claims Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7Small Claims

Filings

Small Claims Dispositions

ThousandsThousands

80

Page 88: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 5

SOURCE: TABLE 6

FIGURE 5-Civil Dispositions Fiscal Year 1996–97

39%

84%

61%

16%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Other civil

Small claims

Before trial After trial

n=420,327

n=584,554

FIGURE 6-Felony Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Felony Filings

Felony Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

81

Page 89: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 5 Civil Dispositions by Type of Proceeding

Fiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

Fiscal Before-trial After-trialType of proceeding year Total dispositions dispositions dispositions

(A) (B) (C)

Total civil a 1987–88 829,428 100.0 % 443,154 53.4 % 386,274 46.6 %1995–96 980,656 r 100.0 628,912 r 64.1 351,744 r 35.91996–97 1,004,881 100.0 654,533 65.1 350,348 34.9

Small claims 1987–88 375,490 45.3 79,980 9.6 295,510 35.61995–96 409,534 r 41.8 152,380 r 15.5 257,154 r 26.21996–97 420,327 41.8 163,008 16.2 257,319 25.6

Other civil 1987–88 453,938 54.7 363,174 43.8 90,764 10.91995–96 571,122 r 58.2 476,532 r 48.6 94,590 r 9.61996–97 584,554 58.2 491,525 48.9 93,029 9.3

_________(A) (B) + (C).a Percentages may not add to total due to rounding.r Revised.

82

Page 90: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 6 Criminal Filings and Dispositions

By Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Total Nontraffic Trafficexcluding Misdemeanors Misdemeanors Illegal

Fiscal year parking Felonies Group A Group B Infractions Group C Group D Infractions parking(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)

Filings1987–88 8,791,672 209,121 565,022 200,127 169,427 322,993 798,671 6,526,311 7,232,3971988–89 8,800,425 222,459 583,939 194,152 187,352 312,743 854,733 6,445,047 6,795,3741989–90 9,103,486 239,628 589,631 200,971 201,766 339,567 960,425 6,571,498 6,176,7941990–91 8,940,768 229,677 544,422 190,533 218,012 341,918 1,012,282 6,403,924 5,840,7941991–92 8,294,246 243,093 511,345 165,644 205,326 286,673 952,139 5,930,026 5,731,351

1992–93 7,663,269 243,812 507,558 138,612 190,524 246,524 854,050 5,482,189 5,158,7701993–94 7,254,661 247,405 514,697 130,636 167,507 223,058 785,748 5,185,610 1,374,2761994–95 6,763,719 256,959 535,050 124,713 165,343 200,845 719,662 4,761,147 231,1651995–96 6,894,521 r 245,587 r 520,090 r 141,424 r 201,140 r 213,526 r 623,735 r 4,949,019 r 255,506 r

1996–97 6,718,366 251,575 508,255 142,825 196,773 198,602 561,797 4,858,539 3,852

Dispositions1987–88 7,718,972 172,974 459,428 170,286 131,312 281,155 637,733 5,866,084 5,829,7461988–89 7,716,321 191,042 461,307 160,873 129,464 267,512 689,512 5,816,611 5,667,2851989–90 8,132,957 208,494 488,211 164,056 137,716 278,047 791,767 6,064,666 5,319,6491990–91 8,104,734 210,531 483,514 164,743 166,795 302,044 867,512 5,909,595 4,982,9991991–92 7,933,582 219,875 480,530 155,003 171,869 269,014 912,680 5,724,611 5,050,351

1992–93 7,082,404 229,800 472,881 133,398 181,098 226,890 725,526 5,112,811 4,515,8541993–94 6,807,492 222,057 456,607 115,107 164,915 199,365 715,532 4,933,909 1,314,9971994–95 6,570,146 232,413 478,591 106,764 166,185 183,697 727,838 4,674,658 229,0921995–96 6,690,988 r 229,815 r 484,114 r 109,769 r 194,303 r 189,600 r 689,334 r 4,794,053 r 212,5041996–97 6,539,736 233,645 480,059 119,349 168,062 185,146 591,123 4,762,352 7,115

Dispositions per 100 filings1987–88 88 83 81 85 78 87 80 90 811988–89 88 86 79 83 69 86 81 90 831989–90 89 87 83 82 68 82 82 92 861990–91 91 92 89 86 77 88 86 92 851991–92 96 90 94 94 84 94 96 97 88

1992–93 92 94 93 96 95 92 85 93 881993–94 94 90 89 88 98 89 91 95 961994–95 97 90 89 86 101 91 101 98 991995–96 97 94 93 78 97 89 111 97 831996–97 97 93 94 84 85 93 105 98 185_________(A) Sum of (B) through (H).r Revised.

83

Page 91: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts

FIGURE 7-Distribution of Felony Dispositions*Fiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

Fiscal Year 1996–97

Dismissed Before Hearing (31,671) 14%

Disposed of After Hearing (72,853) 32%

Pleas of Guilty to Misdemeanor(22,683) 10%

Pleas of Guilty to Felony

(101,753) 44%

Fiscal Year 1995–96

Fiscal Year 1987–88

Dismissed Before Hearing (31,495) 14%

Disposed of After Hearing (73,740) 33%

Pleas of Guilty to Misdemeanor(22,398) 10%

Pleas of Guilty to Felony

(97,707) 43%

Disposed of After Hearing (73,548) 43%

Pleas of Guilty to Misdemeanor(20,458) 12%

Dismissed Before Hearing (28,357) 17%

Pleas of Guilty to Felony

(48,374) 28%

à

à

à

à

ß

ß

ß

å

å

å

ä

ä

* Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding. SOURCE: TABLE 7

84

Page 92: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 7 Felony Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 and 1995–96through 1996–97

DefendantsDefendants convicted of or

Total held to answer or pled guilty to DefendantsFiscal defendants pled guilty to misdemeanor acquitted or

year disposed felony crimes crimes dismissed(A) (B) (C) (D)

Total a 1987–88 170,737 100.0 % 112,235 65.7 % 20,751 12.2 % 37,751 22.1 %1994–95 230,029 100.0 171,767 74.7 23,672 10.3 34,590 15.01995–96 225,340 r 100.0 169,252 r 75.1 22,839 r 10.1 33,249 r 14.81996–97 228,960 100.0 172,495 75.3 23,138 10.1 33,327 14.6

Before preliminary hearing 1987–88 97,189 56.9 48,374 28.3 b 20,458 12.0 c 28,357 16.61994–95 144,910 64.3 88,927 39.5 b 23,292 10.3 c 32,691 14.51995–96 151,600 r 67.3 97,707 r 43.4 b 22,398 r 9.9 c 31,495 r 14.01996–97 156,107 68.2 101,753 44.4 b 22,683 9.9 c 31,671 13.8

After preliminary hearing 1987–88 73,548 43.1 63,861 37.4 293 0.2 9,394 5.51994–95 85,119 37.8 82,840 36.8 380 0.2 1,899 0.81995–96 73,740 r 32.7 71,545 r 31.7 441 r 0.2 1,754 r 0.81996–97 72,853 31.8 70,742 30.9 455 0.2 1,656 0.7

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (D). Excludes cases transferred to another court.a Percentages may not add to total due to rounding.b Defendants certified to the superior court after pleading guilty or nolo contendere to felony charges or who waived a preliminary hearing.c Pleas of guilty.r Revised.

85

Page 93: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts

SOURCE: TABLE 6 SOURCE: TABLE 6

SOURCE: TABLE 6

FIGURE 8-Nontraffic Misdemeanor and Infraction

Filings and Dispositions Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Group A Misdemeanor Filings

Group A Misdemeanor Dispositions

Group B Misdemeanor Filings

Group B Misdemeanor Dispositions

Infraction Filings

Infraction Dispositions

Thousands Thousands

å

FIGURE 9-Traffic MisdemeanorFilings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Thousands

Group D MisdemeanorFilings

Group D MisdemeanorDispositions

Group C MisdemeanorDispositions

Group C MisdemeanorFilings

Thousands

FIGURE 10-Traffic InfractionFilings and Dispositions

Fiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

87–8

8

88–8

9

89–9

0

90–9

1

91–9

2

92–9

3

93–9

4

94–9

5

95–9

6

96–9

7

Traffic InfractionFilings

Traffic InfractionDispositions

MillionsMillions

ää

å

å

ä

86

Page 94: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal CourtsTable 8

Misdemeanor and Infraction DispositionsBy Type of ProceedingFiscal Years 1987–88, 1995–96, and 1996–97

Before trialFiscal Bail Pleas of Dismissals After

Type of proceeding year Total forfeitures guilty and transfers trial(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

I. NumberNontraffic Group A misdemeanors 1987–88 459,428 12,373 342,037 98,724 6,294

1995–96 484,114 r 7,262 r 350,531 r 120,577 r 5,744 r

1996–97 480,059 8,927 343,219 122,274 5,639

Group B misdemeanors 1987–88 170,286 38,973 100,252 28,635 2,426

1995–96 109,769 r 13,858 66,726 r 27,345 r 1,840 r

1996–97 119,349 17,275 68,991 30,847 2,236

Infractions 1987–88 131,312 55,643 34,848 30,991 9,830

1995–96 194,303 r 48,899 r 64,576 r 64,267 r 16,561 r

1996–97 168,062 47,103 65,869 39,487 15,603

Traffic Group C misdemeanors 1987–88 281,155 439 261,007 14,911 4,798

1995–96 189,600 r 344 r 172,167 r 14,692 r 2,397 r

1996–97 185,146 806 166,881 15,075 2,384

Group D misdemeanors 1987–88 637,733 124,274 382,045 121,232 10,182

1995–96 689,334 r 105,547 r 418,265 r 151,528 r 13,994 r

1996–97 591,123 65,227 367,671 141,918 16,307

Infractions 1987–88 5,866,084 2,820,999 866,617 1,964,215 214,253

1995–96 4,794,053 r 2,079,349 r 815,627 r 1,636,852 r 262,225 r

1996–97 4,762,352 1,985,791 832,377 1,683,838 260,346

II. Percent a

Nontraffic Group A misdemeanors 1987–88 100.0 % 2.7 % 74.4 % 21.5 % 1.4 %

1995–96 100.0 1.5 72.4 24.9 1.2 1996–97 100.0 1.9 71.5 25.5 1.2

Group B misdemeanors 1987–88 100.0 22.9 58.9 16.8 1.41995–96 100.0 12.6 60.8 24.9 1.71996–97 100.0 14.5 57.8 25.8 1.9

Infractions 1987–88 100.0 42.4 26.5 23.6 7.51995–96 100.0 25.2 33.2 33.1 8.51996–97 100.0 28.0 39.2 23.5 9.3

Traffic Group C misdemeanors 1987–88 100.0 0.2 92.8 5.3 1.7

1995–96 100.0 0.2 90.8 7.7 1.31996–97 100.0 0.4 90.1 8.1 1.3

Group D misdemeanors 1987–88 100.0 19.5 59.9 19.0 1.61995–96 100.0 15.3 60.7 22.0 2.01996–97 100.0 11.0 62.2 24.0 2.8

Infractions 1987–88 100.0 48.1 14.8 33.5 3.71995–96 100.0 43.4 17.0 34.1 5.51996–97 100.0 41.7 17.5 35.4 5.5

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (E).a Percentages may not add to total due to rounding.r Revised.

87

Page 95: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Municipal Courts

FIGURE 11-Criminal Dispositions* Fiscal Year 1996–97

SOURCE: TABLE 8

* Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

11%

0%

28%

15%

2%

42% 18%

39%

58%

72%

90%

62%

8%

24%

26%

26%

24%

35%

1%

2%

9%

1%

3%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Traffic Infractions

Group DMisdemeanors

Group CMisdemeanors

Nontraffic Infractions

Group BMisdemeanors

Group AMisdemeanors

n=4,762,352

n=591,123

n=185,146

n=168,062

n=119,349

n=480,059

Bail ForfeituresDismissals and TransfersBefore Trial

Pleas of Guilty Disposed of After Trial

88

Page 96: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENTSAND ASSISTANCE

Page 97: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial AssignmentsAnd Assistance FIGURE 1-Days of Assistance Rendered

By Judge SourceFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

91

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

87–88 88–89 89–90 90–91 91–92 92–93 93–94 94–95 95–96 96–97

Retired Judges Courts of Appeal Superior Courts Municipal Courts Justice Courts

Thousands

SOURCE: TABLE 1

Page 98: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial Assignments And Assistance Table 1

Assistance Received and Rendered a

By Type of CourtFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Days rendered by judge sourceCourt Superior Municipal Justice

Retired of Appeal court court courtDays received by Total judges justices judges judges judges

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

All courts1987–88 16,935 7,726 80 2,859 1,960 4,3041988–89 16,893 8,855 176 2,115 2,001 3,7461989–90 16,593 9,253 43 1,957 1,795 3,5451990–91 15,799 9,513 25 1,188 2,042 3,0311991–92 23,948 17,141 14 1,040 2,771 2,982

1992–93 b 22,739 19,314 25 925 757 1,7181993–94 b 21,393 18,967 9 990 249 1,1781994–95 b 26,037 23,368 0 1,155 1,514 c — c

1995–96 b 24,136 r 22,169 r 0 569 r 1,398 r,c — c

1996–97 b 27,107 25,348 12 556 1,192 c — c

Courts of Appeal1987–88 2,607 1,077 9 1,449 71 01988–89 1,543 366 112 965 100 01989–90 1,113 224 18 703 168 01990–91 1,228 566 0 432 230 01991–92 1,471 802 0 310 359 0

1992–93 b 2,200 964 0 606 630 01993–94 b 1,584 744 0 676 164 01994–95 b 1,389 474 0 790 125 c — c

1995–96 b 1,117 280 0 360 477 c — c

1996–97 b 1,206 287 0 445 475 — c

Superior courts1987–88 7,157 4,078 71 1,227 1,554 2251988–89 8,044 5,089 64 961 1,557 3731989–90 7,872 5,107 25 854 1,423 4601990–91 8,042 5,229 25 584 1,668 5361991–92 13,906 10,653 14 453 2,323 463

92

Page 99: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial Assignments And Assistance Table 1

Assistance Received and Rendered a

By Type of CourtFiscal Years 1987–88 through 1996–97

Days rendered by judge sourceCourt Superior Municipal Justice

Retired of Appeal court court courtDays received by Total judges justices judges judges judges

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

Superior courts (continued)1992–93 b 11,951 11,581 25 313 3 301993–94 b 13,189 12,852 9 270 6 521994–95 b 16,867 16,415 0 311 141 c — c

1995–96 b 16,442 r 16,104 r 0 202 r 136 r,c — c

1996–97 b 18,473 18,142 12 103 217 c — c

Municipal courts1987–88 5,674 2,362 0 134 260 2,9161988–89 5,964 3,041 0 155 260 2,5071989–90 6,272 3,417 0 335 107 2,4111990–91 5,564 3,342 0 121 81 2,0201991–92 7,399 5,293 0 211 25 1,870

1992–93 b 7,964 6,431 0 0 99 1,4341993–94 b 6,100 4,991 0 39 59 1,0111994–95 b,c 7,782 6,479 0 55 1,248 c — c

1995–96 b,c 6,577 r 5,785 r 0 6 786 r,c — c

1996–97 b,c 7,428 6,919 0 9 501 c — c

Justice courts1987–88 1,496 209 0 48 75 1,1631988–89 1,342 359 0 33 84 8651989–90 1,334 505 0 59 96 6721990–91 965 376 0 51 63 4751991–92 1,172 393 0 66 64 649

1992–93 b 623 338 0 6 26 2541993–94 b 521 381 0 6 20 1151994–95 c — c — c — c — c — c — c

1995–96 c — c — c — c — c — c — c

1996–97 c — c — c — c — c — c — c

_________(A) Sum of (B) through (F). Components may not add to total due to rounding.a Includes only assistance rendered by judges through assignments. Does not include assistance rendered by commissioners, referees, and temporary judges.b Effective July 1, 1992, blanket assignment activity was no longer a reporting requirement and is not included in the total number of days of assistance

received, beginning fiscal year 1992–93.c Effective January 1, 1995, all justice courts became municipal courts pursuant to passage of Proposition 191.r Revised.

93

Page 100: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial Assignments And Assistance Table 2

California Superior CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistancereceived from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ AttorneysVacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial positionCourt judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 805 (18.9) 183.6 18,473 6,772 5,982 (533) 30,693 122.8 1,080.4

Alameda 34 (0.7) 5.0 1,013 0 0 0 1,013 4.1 42.3Alpine 1 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 (13) (12) (0.1) 1.0Amador 1 0.0 0.0 128 0 21 0 149 0.6 1.6Butte 5 (0.5) 2.0 301 0 0 0 301 1.2 7.2 b

Calaveras 1 0.0 0.0 126 0 0 0 126 0.5 1.5Colusa 1 0.0 0.0 16 0 0 (1) 16 0.1 1.1Contra Costa 18 (1.4) 5.0 566 448 169 0 1,183 4.7 25.8 b

Del Norte 1 0.0 0.0 37 0 0 (1) 36 0.1 1.1El Dorado 3 0.0 2.0 353 0 26 0 378 1.5 6.5Fresno 17 0.0 5.0 159 95 169 (9) 414 1.7 23.7Glenn 1 0.0 0.0 46 0 0 (15) 31 0.1 1.1Humboldt 3 (0.2) 0.0 146 0 0 (0) 146 0.6 3.4Imperial 4 0.0 0.0 39 167 14 0 220 0.9 3.9 b

Inyo 1 (0.3) 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.7 i

Kern 15 0.0 3.0 224 13 39 0 275 1.1 19.1Kings 3 0.0 1.0 0 0 4 0 4 0.0 4.0Lake 2 0.0 0.0 91 0 0 0 91 0.4 2.4Lassen 1 0.0 0.0 95 0 0 0 95 0.4 1.4Los Angeles 238 (3.2) 75.2 4,318 4,911 1,100 (227) 10,102 40.4 347.4 b

Madera 3 0.0 0.0 9 2 9 0 21 0.1 3.1Marin 6 0.0 2.0 238 31 0 0 269 1.1 9.1Mariposa 1 0.0 0.0 0 0 6 (8) (2) 0.0 1.0Mendocino 3 0.0 0.0 337 0 18 0 355 1.4 4.4Merced 3 0.0 1.0 54 0 9 0 63 0.3 4.3Modoc 1 0.0 0.0 24 0 0 (5) 19 0.1 1.1Mono 1 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 0.0 1.0Monterey 8 (0.5) 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 7.5Napa 4 (0.4) 1.0 185 2 7 (2) 192 0.8 4.9 b

Nevada 3 0.0 0.0 87 0 0 (2) 86 0.3 3.3Orange 61 (2.3) 18.0 2,193 289 543 0 3,025 12.1 87.0 b

Placer 5 (0.4) 2.0 26 0 97 0 123 0.5 6.6 b

Plumas 1 0.0 0.0 64 0 0 (13) 51 0.2 1.2Riverside 26 (1.6) 8.0 414 0 120 0 534 2.1 33.5 b

Sacramento 33 (0.6) 5.0 664 207 526 0 1,397 5.6 42.5 b

San Benito 1 0.0 0.0 139 0 0 0 139 0.6 1.6

94

Page 101: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial Assignments And Assistance Table 2

California Superior CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistancereceived from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ AttorneysVacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial positionCourt judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 805 (18.9) 183.6 18,473 6,772 5,982 (533) 30,693 122.8 1,080.4

San Bernardino 30 (1.5) 6.0 738 66 499 0 1,303 5.2 38.7 b

San Diego 71 (0.2) 7.0 1,486 0 627 0 2,113 8.5 86.3San Francisco 29 (0.2) 11.0 768 0 143 0 911 3.6 43.4San Joaquin 13 (0.5) 1.0 312 28 15 0 354 1.4 14.9San Luis Obispo 5 (0.5) 1.0 344 0 53 (200) 197 0.8 6.3San Mateo 17 (0.3) 2.0 68 0 222 0 290 1.2 19.9Santa Barbara 10 0.0 1.0 232 0 40 0 272 1.1 12.1Santa Clara 44 (0.5) 5.0 754 16 1,030 (1) 1,799 7.2 55.7Santa Cruz 5 (1.0) 1.0 16 8 52 0 75 0.3 5.3Shasta 5 (0.3) 1.0 475 0 0 (2) 473 1.9 7.1 b

Sierra 1 (0.4) 0.0 13 0 0 (5) 8 0.0 0.6Siskiyou 1 0.0 0.0 124 0 0 (3) 121 0.5 1.5Solano 9 (0.9) 3.0 28 0 45 (0) 73 0.3 10.4 b

Sonoma 9 (0.0) 1.0 125 0 77 (1) 201 0.8 10.8Stanislaus 9 (0.2) 3.4 51 95 18 0 164 0.7 12.4 b

Sutter 3 0.0 0.0 27 0 0 0 27 0.1 3.1Tehama 2 (0.4) 0.0 157 0 0 0 157 0.6 2.3Trinity 1 0.0 0.0 5 0 0 (7) (2) 0.0 1.0 i

Tulare 7 0.0 2.0 57 102 1 (19) 141 0.6 9.6Tuolumne 2 0.0 0.0 52 0 29 0 81 0.3 2.3Ventura 15 0.0 2.0 500 293 213 0 1,007 4.0 21.0Yolo 4 0.0 1.0 0 0 41 0 41 0.2 5.2Yuba 3 0.0 0.0 53 0 1 (0) 54 0.2 3.2

_________(B) FTE = Full-time Equivalent. Number of working days within the fiscal year not utilized due to unfilled judge position(s) divided by 250 available working

days per judge in fiscal year 1996–97.(G) Days rendered by superior court judges to Courts of Appeal and trial courts.(H) Sum of (D) through (G). A (negative) number indicates that the court rendered more days than it received. Components may not add to total due to rounding.(I) Column (H) / 250 available working days per judicial position in fiscal year 1996–97. Net number of judicial positions received or (rendered). Components

may not add to total due to rounding.(J) (A) + (B) + (C) + (I). Components may not add to total due to rounding.a Components may not add to total due to rounding.b Figure adjusted to exclude available working days prior to authorization of new judicial positions.i Incomplete.

95

Page 102: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial AssignmentsAnd AssistanceTable 3

California Municipal CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistance

received from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ Attorneys

Vacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial position

County/Court judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 675 (22.1) 179.8 7,428 4,234 7,924 (1,148) 18,442 73.8 903.5

Alameda County 34 (2.5) 9.0 708 46 444 0 1,197 4.8 44.9Alameda Municipal 1 0.0 1.0 0 0 24 0 24 0.1 2.1Berkeley-Albany Municipal 4 0.0 1.0 0 0 10 0 10 0.0 5.0Fremont-Newark-Union City Municipal 4 (0.4) 2.0 119 0 100 0 220 0.9 6.5Livermore-Pleasanton-Dublin Municipal 3 (0.1) 1.0 46 46 103 0 195 0.8 4.3 b

Oakland-Piedmont-Emeryville Municipal 14 (1.6) 3.0 454 0 194 0 648 2.6 18.0San Leandro-Hayward Municipal 8 (0.4) 1.0 89 0 12 0 101 0.4 9.0

Alpine CountyAlpine Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 (48) (47) (0.2) 0.8

Amador CountyAmador Municipal 1 (0.5) 0.0 148 0 0 0 148 0.6 1.1

Butte County 4 (0.5) 0.0 172 0 1 0 173 0.7 4.2North Butte Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 49 0 1 0 50 0.2 2.2South Butte Municipal 2 (0.5) 0.0 123 0 0 0 123 0.5 2.0

Calaveras CountyCalaveras Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 32 0 0 (8) 24 0.1 1.1

Colusa CountyColusa-Williams Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 24 0 0 (23) 1 0.0 1.0

Contra Costa County 14 (0.8) 4.0 271 333 0 0 604 2.4 19.6Bay Municipal 5 (0.8) 1.0 202 127 0 0 329 1.3 6.5Delta Municipal 2 0.0 1.0 38 131 0 0 169 0.7 3.7Mt. Diablo Municipal 4 0.0 1.0 18 43 0 0 61 0.2 5.2Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal 3 0.0 1.0 14 32 0 0 45 0.2 4.2

Del Norte CountyDel Norte Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 32 0 1 0 33 0.1 1.1

El Dorado CountyEl Dorado Municipal 3 0.0 0.0 36 27 264 0 327 1.3 4.3

Fresno County 18 (0.5) 2.0 81 0 224 (2) 304 1.2 20.7Central Valley Municipal 8 0.0 0.0 2 0 17 (1) 18 0.1 8.1Fresno Municipal 10 (0.5) 2.0 79 0 207 (1) 285 1.1 12.6

Glenn CountyGlenn Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 33 0 1 (12) 22 0.1 1.1

Humboldt CountyHumboldt Municipal 4 (0.5) 0.0 119 0 7 (4) 121 0.5 4.0

Imperial CountyImperial Municipal 5 (0.5) 0.8 108 250 15 0 373 1.5 6.3 b

Inyo CountyInyo Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 5 0 0 (2) 3 0.0 1.0

Kern County 17 (1.0) 4.0 167 30 269 0 466 1.9 20.9Bakersfield Municipal 9 0.0 2.0 7 12 0 0 19 0.1 11.1East Kern Municipal 2 0.0 1.0 37 5 11 0 53 0.2 3.2North Kern Municipal 3 (0.5) 1.0 1 13 257 0 271 1.1 4.1 b

South Kern Municipal 3 (0.5) 0.0 123 0 0 0 123 0.5 2.5 b

Kings CountyKings Municipal 4 0.0 0.0 16 0 0 0 16 0.1 4.1

96

Page 103: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial AssignmentsAnd AssistanceTable 3

California Municipal CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistance

received from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ Attorneys

Vacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial position

County/Court judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 675 (22.1) 179.8 7,428 4,234 7,924 (1,148) 18,442 73.8 903.5

Lake CountyLake Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 16 0 0 0 16 0.1 2.1

Lassen CountyLassen Municipal 1 (0.5) 0.0 82 0 0 0 82 0.3 0.8

Los Angeles County 190 (5.1) 69.0 2,287 1,675 3,610 (476) 7,096 28.4 282.1Alhambra Municipal 3 0.0 1.0 13 0 27 0 40 0.2 4.2Antelope Municipal 5 (0.7) 1.0 149 128 46 0 322 1.3 6.6Beverly Hills Municipal 3 0.0 2.0 32 0 17 0 49 0.2 5.2Burbank Municipal 2 0.0 1.0 0 0 100 0 100 0.4 3.4Citrus Municipal 8 (0.7) 2.0 75 246 234 0 555 2.2 11.1 b

Compton Municipal 9 0.0 5.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 14.0Culver Municipal 2 0.0 1.0 17 0 81 0 98 0.4 3.4Downey Municipal 5 0.0 2.0 85 0 29 (1) 113 0.5 7.5East Los Angeles Municipal 5 (0.5) 2.0 147 0 37 0 183 0.7 7.3Glendale Municipal 3 0.0 2.0 89 69 117 0 275 1.1 6.1Inglewood Municipal 6 (0.4) 2.0 223 96 163 0 482 1.9 9.5Long Beach Municipal 10 (0.3) 3.0 0 0 109 (126) (17) (0.1) 12.6Los Angeles Municipal 89 (2.0) 23.0 488 535 2,053 0 3,075 12.3 122.3Los Cerritos Municipal 3 (0.1) 2.0 159 85 3 0 247 1.0 5.9Malibu Municipal 1 0.0 2.0 18 0 52 0 70 0.3 3.3Newhall Municipal 3 0.0 0.0 53 248 1 0 302 1.2 4.2Pasadena Municipal 4 (0.0) 2.0 93 6 74 0 173 0.7 6.7Pomona Municipal 3 0.0 3.0 39 120 70 0 229 0.9 6.9Rio Hondo Municipal 4 0.0 2.0 46 44 58 0 148 0.6 6.6Santa Anita Municipal 1 0.0 2.0 9 0 61 0 70 0.3 3.3Santa Monica Municipal 3 0.0 1.0 19 0 74 0 93 0.4 4.4South Bay Municipal 9 0.0 2.0 260 29 175 (349) 115 0.5 11.5Southeast Municipal 5 (0.4) 4.0 203 69 9 0 281 1.1 9.8Whittier Municipal 4 (0.1) 2.0 71 0 24 0 95 0.4 6.3

Madera CountyMadera Municipal 4 0.0 0.0 20 0 15 (4) 31 0.1 4.1

Marin CountyMarin Municipal 4 (0.5) 2.0 11 107 6 0 124 0.5 6.0

Mariposa CountyMariposa Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 (58) (56) (0.2) 0.8

Mendocino CountyMendocino Municipal 7 (1.0) 0.0 4 0 20 (171) (147) (0.6) 5.4

Merced CountyMerced Municipal 3 0.0 2.0 61 0 16 (1) 75 0.3 5.3

Modoc CountyModoc Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 22 0 0 (72) (49) (0.2) 0.8

Mono CountyMono Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 8 0 0 (13) (5) 0.0 1.0

Monterey CountyMonterey Municipal 10 0.0 1.0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 11.0

97

Page 104: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial AssignmentsAnd AssistanceTable 3

California Municipal CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistance

received from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ Attorneys

Vacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial position

County/Court judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 675 (22.1) 179.8 7,428 4,234 7,924 (1,148) 18,442 73.8 903.5

Napa CountyNapa Municipal 2 (0.6) 1.0 180 2 7 0 189 0.8 3.6 b

Nevada CountyNevada Municipal 3 0.0 0.0 175 0 47 (2) 220 0.9 3.9

Orange County 47 (1.4) 15.0 313 14 574 0 900 3.6 63.8Central Orange Municipal 13 (0.5) 2.0 0 0 84 0 84 0.3 14.9North Orange Municipal 12 (0.3) 4.0 190 0 66 0 256 1.0 16.5 b

Orange County Harbor Municipal 8 (0.3) 2.0 0 0 115 0 115 0.5 10.2South Orange Municipal 4 (0.2) 5.0 122 14 60 0 195 0.8 9.4 b

West Orange Municipal 10 (0.2) 2.0 1 0 251 0 252 1.0 12.8Placer County

Placer Municipal c 4 0.0 1.0 30 0 99 0 129 0.5 5.5Plumas County

Plumas Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 59 0 0 (49) 10 0.0 1.0 i

Riverside County 22 (0.4) 10.0 324 7 212 0 543 2.2 33.7Desert Municipal 7 0.0 1.0 14 0 13 0 27 0.1 8.1Mt. San Jacinto Municipal 4 (0.4) 2.0 0 7 49 0 56 0.2 5.8Three Lakes Municipal 2 0.0 2.0 62 0 36 0 98 0.4 4.4Western Riverside Municipal 9 0.0 5.0 248 0 114 0 362 1.5 15.4

Sacramento County 17 (0.0) 6.0 142 428 93 0 664 2.7 25.3Sacramento Municipal 16 (0.0) 6.0 133 428 93 0 655 2.6 24.3 b

South Sacramento Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 9 0 0 0 9 0.0 1.0San Benito County

San Benito Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 1.0San Bernardino County

San Bernardino Municipal 30 (0.8) 4.0 267 12 228 0 507 2.0 35.3San Diego County 56 (0.3) 15.0 26 541 363 0 930 3.7 74.5

El Cajon Municipal 10 (0.3) 2.0 4 0 156 0 160 0.6 12.4North County Municipal 11 0.0 3.0 22 0 106 0 128 0.5 14.5San Diego Municipal 28 0.0 8.0 0 541 0 0 541 2.2 38.2South Bay Municipal 7 0.0 2.0 0 0 101 0 101 0.4 9.4

San Francisco CountySan Francisco Municipal 20 0.0 4.0 285 228 0 (1) 512 2.1 26.0

San Joaquin County 12 0.0 2.0 75 38 3 (2) 115 0.5 14.4Lodi Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 41 0 3 0 44 0.2 2.2Manteca-Ripon-Escalon-Tracy Municipal 3 0.0 1.0 34 0 0 0 34 0.1 4.1Stockton Municipal 7 0.0 1.0 0 38 0 (2) 37 0.2 8.1

San Luis Obispo CountySan Luis Obispo Municipal 5 (0.5) 1.0 142 0 0 (1) 141 0.6 6.0

San Mateo CountySan Mateo Municipal 9 (0.5) 5.0 77 158 560 0 795 3.2 16.7

Santa Barbara County 9 (0.7) 4.0 171 0 87 (44) 215 0.9 12.6North Santa Barbara Municipal 5 (0.3) 2.0 27 0 8 (25) 10 0.0 6.3 b

Santa Barbara Municipal 4 (0.5) 2.0 144 0 79 (19) 204 0.8 6.3Santa Clara County

Santa Clara Municipal 35 (0.5) 5.0 1 0 340 (1) 340 1.4 40.9

98

Page 105: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Judicial AssignmentsAnd AssistanceTable 3

California Municipal CourtsDays Received and RenderedFiscal Year 1996–97

Days of assistance

received from Net assistance

Authorized Part-time/ Attorneys

Vacant commis- temporary acting as Judge Judicial

Authorized judge sioners & commissioners temporary days Judicial position

County/Court judges FTEs referees Judges & referees judges rendered Days positions equivalents(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J)

Statewide a 675 (22.1) 179.8 7,428 4,234 7,924 (1,148) 18,442 73.8 903.5

Santa Cruz CountySanta Cruz Municipal 5 0.0 2.0 45 44 2 (17) 73 0.3 7.3

Shasta CountyShasta Municipal 4 (0.4) 1.0 24 0 67 (1) 90 0.4 5.0

Sierra CountySierra Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 5 0 0 (80) (76) (0.3) 0.7

Siskiyou CountySiskiyou Municipal 3 0.0 0.0 60 0 3 (20) 43 0.2 3.2

Solano County 7 0.0 3.0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 10.0Northern Solano Municipal 4 0.0 2.0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 6.0Vallejo-Benicia Municipal 3 0.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 4.0

Sonoma CountySonoma Municipal 6 (0.7) 3.0 97 0 101 0 198 0.8 9.1

Stanislaus CountyStanislaus Municipal 8 (0.3) 1.0 165 0 40 0 205 0.8 9.5

Sutter CountySutter Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 9 0 0 (0) 8 0.0 2.0

Tehama CountyTehama Municipal 2 (0.2) 0.0 6 0 0 0 6 0.0 1.9

Trinity CountyTrinity Municipal 1 0.0 0.0 12 0 0 (14) (2) (0.0) 1.0 i

Tulare CountyTulare Municipal 9 (1.0) 1.0 221 56 10 (1) 285 1.1 10.1

Tuolumne CountyTuolumne Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 14 0 1 (22) (7) (0.0) 2.0

Ventura CountyVentura Municipal 12 0.0 1.0 38 240 139 0 417 1.7 14.7

Yolo CountyYolo Municipal 4 0.0 1.0 0 0 57 0 58 0.2 5.2

Yuba CountyYuba Municipal 2 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 0 2 0.0 2.0

___________(B) FTE = Full-time Equivalent. Number of working days within the fiscal year not utilized due to unfilled judge position(s) divided by 250 available working

days per judge in fiscal year 1996–97.(G) Days rendered by municipal court judges to Courts of Appeal and trial courts.(H) Sum of (D) through (G). A (negative) number indicates that the court rendered more days than it received. Components may not add to total due to rounding.(I) Column (H) / 250 available working days per judicial position in fiscal year 1996–97. Net number of judicial positions received or (rendered). Components

may not add to total due to rounding.(J) (A) + (B) + (C) + (I). Components may not add to total due to rounding.a Components may not add to total due to rounding.b Figure adjusted to exclude available working days prior to authorization of new judicial positions.c Consolidated.i Incomplete.

99

Page 106: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SECTION II:

WORKLOAD DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL COURTS

Fiscal Years 1995–96 and 1996–97

Page 107: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

CHANGES IN TRIAL COURT JUDICIAL POSITIONSFISCAL YEAR 1996–97

CHANGES IN AUTHORIZED JUDGESHIPSTwenty-one additional trial court judgeships were authorized in 1996 by legislation.

COURT COUNTY FROM TO EFFECTIVE DATE

BUTTE SUPERIOR BUTTE 4 5 1/1/97CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR CONTRA COSTA 17 18 1/1/97IMPERIAL SUPERIOR IMPERIAL 3 4 1/1/97NAPA SUPERIOR NAPA 3 4 1/1/97ORANGE SUPERIOR ORANGE 59 61 1/1/97PLACER SUPERIOR PLACER 4 5 1/1/97RIVERSIDE SUPERIOR RIVERSIDE 24 26 1/1/97SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR SACRAMENTO 32 33 1/1/97SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR SAN BERNARDINO 28 30 1/1/97SHASTA SUPERIOR SHASTA 4 5 1/1/97SOLANO SUPERIOR SOLANO 7 9 1/1/97STANISLAUS SUPERIOR STANISLAUS 8 9 1/1/97LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL ALAMEDA 2 3 1/1/97IMPERIAL MUNICIPAL IMPERIAL 4 5 1/1/97NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL KERN 2 3 1/1/97SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL KERN 2 3 1/1/97CITRUS MUNICIPAL LOS ANGELES 7 8 1/1/97NAPA MUNICIPAL NAPA 3 2 1/1/97NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL SANTA BARBARA 4 5 1/1/97

CHANGES IN AUTHORIZED COMMISSIONERS a

COURT COUNTY FROM TO EFFECTIVE DATE

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR LOS ANGELES 60 64 6/17/97ORANGE SUPERIOR ORANGE 13 14 6/26/97LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL ALAMEDA 1.3 1.0 1/1/97NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL ORANGE 3 4 12/3/96SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL ORANGE 4 5 11/5/96SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL SACRAMENTO 5.5 6.0 1/3/97

a Positions created and adopted by resolution of the county’s board of supervisors.

Page 108: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURT CONSOLIDATIONSFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

COUNTY COURT CONSOLIDATIONS EFFECTIVEDATE a

STATISTICS FORCONSOLIDATED COURTSHOWN AS OF

PLACER Tahoe Municipal consolidated with Placer Municipal 7/1/95 July 1995

a Based on the date that the county board of supervisors passed a resolution to consolidate municipal courts.

Page 109: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

TRIAL COURT COORDINATION STATISTICS

The Trial Court Realignment and Efficiency Act of 1991 (Assem. Bill 1297) required each California trial court to develop and submit to the Judicial Council aplan for coordinating its operations with at least one other court. The act called for implementation of approved plans to begin July 1, 1992. Beginning July 1,1992, courts were given the option of reporting case filings and dispositions processed under trial court coordination. The coordinated workload included in thisreport does not represent the full extent of coordination efforts taking place throughout the state. However, the reports submitted provide examples of case typesbeing processed within trial court coordination agreements.

SUPERIOR COURTSMunicipal Court Tables 1–15 include municipal court filings and dispositions processed by the following superior courts under trial court coordination:

EFFECTIVE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE

ALAMEDA May 1995 SAN JOAQUIN July 1993CONTRA COSTA April 1994 STANISLAUS January 1993MONTEREY June 1993 TULARE September 1995SAN FRANCISCO May 1995

MUNICIPAL COURTSSuperior Court Tables 1–20 include superior court filings and dispositions processed by the following municipal courts under trial court coordination:

EFFECTIVE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE

ALAMEDA COUNTY MONTEREY COUNTYALAMEDA May 1996 MONTEREY December 1992BERKELEY-ALBANY March 1996FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY April 1996 SAN DIEGO COUNTYOAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE July 1992 EL CAJON July 1992

NORTH January 1994CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

BAY May 1993 STANISLAUS COUNTYDELTA April 1997 STANISLAUS March 1994MT. DIABLO May 1993WALNUT CREEK May 1993 TULARE COUNTY

TULARE September 1993KERN COUNTY

BAKERSFIELD April 1996EAST KERN July 1995NORTH KERN June 1996SOUTH KERN June 1996

Page 110: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS

NOTICES OF ORIGINAL ORIGINAL

TOTAL APPEAL PROCEEDINGS TOTAL APPEALS PROCEEDINGS

COURT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 27,681 26,912 18,802 18,843 8,879 8,069 28,087 25,584 18,927 17,438 9,160 8,146

DISTRICT I - TOTAL 4,178 4,184 2,726 2,864 1,452 1,320 4,287 4,150 2,850 2,811 1,437 1,339

DIVISION 1 — — — — — — 883 901 588 641 295 260DIVISION 2 — — — — — — 868 856 587 589 281 267DIVISION 3 — — — — — — 950 734 663 483 287 251DIVISION 4 — — — — — — 875 911 573 631 302 280DIVISION 5 — — — — — — 711 748 439 467 272 281

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 10,166 9,609 6,696 6,548 3,470 3,061 10,598 8,982 6,990 5,960 3,608 3,022

106 DIVISION 1 — — — — — — 1,570 1,276 1,013 822 557 454DIVISION 2 — — — — — — 1,518 1,187 950 739 568 448DIVISION 3 — — — — — — 1,454 1,323 908 847 546 476DIVISION 4 — — — — — — 1,508 1,316 960 827 548 489DIVISION 5 — — — — — — 1,469 1,221 919 763 550 458DIVISION 6 1,064 1,062 716 742 348 320 1,184 1,072 823 752 361 320DIVISION 7 — — — — — — 1,108 929 676 599 432 330NOT ASSIGNED 9,102 8,547 5,980 5,806 3,122 2,741 787 658 741 611 46 47

DISTRICT III 2,854 2,847 2,022 2,088 832 759 2,926 2,757 2,065 1,995 861 762

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 6,643 6,591 4,587 4,635 2,056 1,956 6,565 6,128 4,438 4,120 2,127 2,008

DIVISION 1 2,564 2,465 1,839 1,781 725 684 2,500 2,353 1,740 1,644 760 709DIVISION 2 2,223 2,112 1,490 1,472 733 640 2,236 2,067 1,485 1,398 751 669DIVISION 3 1,856 2,014 1,258 1,382 598 632 1,829 1,708 1,213 1,078 616 630

DISTRICT V 2,318 2,223 1,681 1,625 637 598 2,243 2,095 1,562 1,456 681 639

DISTRICT VI 1,522 1,458 1,090 1,083 432 375 1,468 1,472 1,022 1,096 446 376

Page 111: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF FILINGS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

NOTICES OF APPEAL APPEAL RECORDS FILED ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE

COURT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 7,963 8,071 8,818 8,733 2,021 2,039 6,387 5,628 8,610 8,087 1,884 1,926 4,236 4,012 4,020 3,379 623 678

DISTRICT I 1,347 1,345 1,058 1,161 321 358 1,281 1,081 1,035 1,174 300 353 686 659 709 584 57 77

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 3,303 3,311 2,842 2,706 551 531 2,683 2,043 2,990 2,530 518 499 1,814 1,699 1,446 1,192 210 170

DIVISION 6 347 320 329 361 40 61 243 296 319 401 40 63 208 183 123 118 17 19OTHERS 2,956 2,991 2,513 2,345 511 470 2,440 1,747 2,671 2,129 478 436 1,606 1,516 1,323 1,074 193 151

DISTRICT III 675 657 1,094 1,165 253 266 524 521 936 1,009 244 257 313 279 437 373 82 107

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 1,976 2,034 2,094 2,078 517 523 1,394 1,431 1,955 1,845 468 463 1,039 1,043 830 698 187 215

DIVISION 1 731 678 854 861 254 242 516 502 810 821 228 231 335 370 309 219 81 95

1 DIVISION 2 571 606 814 766 105 100 325 369 715 591 85 68 321 284 349 291 63 6507 DIVISION 3 674 750 426 451 158 181 553 560 430 433 155 164 383 389 172 188 43 55

DISTRICT V 290 314 1,143 1,073 248 238 256 260 1,158 1,036 232 237 185 151 393 366 59 81

DISTRICT VI 372 410 587 550 131 123 249 292 536 493 122 117 199 181 205 166 28 28

Page 112: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF APPEALS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BY WRITTEN OPINION WITHOUT OPINION, RECORD FILED NO RECORD FILED

CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE

COURT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 4,296 4,004 7,289 6,464 1,494 1,356 1,756 1,622 1,138 1,163 501 415 2,047 2,041 360 318 46 55

DISTRICT I - TOTAL 782 738 980 951 242 269 261 292 184 193 102 75 253 243 43 48 3 2

DIVISION 1 161 158 178 207 42 66 53 76 59 49 27 19 60 55 8 11 0 0DIVISION 2 164 151 213 201 57 66 55 46 31 51 16 20 44 50 6 3 1 1DIVISION 3 171 124 229 165 61 41 75 46 45 41 21 14 50 39 10 12 1 1DIVISION 4 154 171 199 208 47 53 49 75 31 32 21 19 60 60 11 13 1 0DIVISION 5 132 134 161 170 35 43 29 49 18 20 17 3 39 39 8 9 0 0

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 1,810 1,604 2,504 2,049 433 297 744 566 350 319 111 104 991 973 33 40 14 8

DIVISION 1 286 237 422 346 81 44 105 71 54 45 19 14 39 56 4 9 3 0DIVISION 2 273 194 383 298 75 44 98 75 51 46 19 20 46 61 4 0 1 1

1 DIVISION 3 229 263 374 312 75 61 133 95 48 45 12 14 27 48 9 8 1 108 DIVISION 4 330 261 360 300 52 45 115 95 45 50 16 19 41 49 1 6 0 2DIVISION 5 283 225 355 291 61 43 115 82 55 48 18 16 25 51 6 7 1 0DIVISION 6 228 226 356 279 42 47 73 81 52 39 11 10 56 66 5 4 0 0DIVISION 7 181 198 254 223 47 13 96 63 45 46 16 11 33 40 3 5 1 0NOT ASSIGNED 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 724 602 1 1 7 4

DISTRICT III 371 399 900 783 160 169 129 156 136 159 94 62 131 141 138 121 6 5

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 990 788 1,583 1,505 404 401 474 445 255 259 80 66 501 528 133 92 18 36

DIVISION 1 308 315 730 662 178 194 192 167 95 129 34 30 157 122 38 19 8 6DIVISION 2 312 230 562 513 67 80 106 137 94 91 20 15 226 239 89 67 9 26DIVISION 3 370 243 291 330 159 127 176 141 66 39 26 21 118 167 6 6 1 4

DISTRICT V 139 177 886 726 151 143 74 85 148 176 100 96 59 48 2 4 3 1

DISTRICT VI 204 298 436 450 104 77 74 78 65 57 14 12 112 108 11 13 2 3

Page 113: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 4 DISPOSITIONS OF ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BY WRITTEN OPINION WITHOUT OPINION

CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE

COURT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 297 278 225 254 327 319 4,088 3,658 3,724 3,125 499 512

DISTRICT I - TOTAL 29 38 39 38 43 67 630 622 639 551 57 23

DIVISION 1 4 4 4 3 9 12 127 116 140 122 11 3DIVISION 2 8 4 10 10 9 9 124 133 116 103 14 8DIVISION 3 5 10 14 11 7 18 128 116 123 96 10 0DIVISION 4 8 11 6 5 11 16 132 133 137 112 8 3DIVISION 5 4 9 5 9 7 12 119 124 123 118 14 9

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 151 135 71 65 108 79 1,770 1,478 1,354 1,131 154 134

DIVISION 1 40 28 22 20 19 9 254 225 214 159 8 13

1 DIVISION 2 26 20 10 10 17 11 277 211 221 188 17 809 DIVISION 3 13 21 8 6 17 19 264 227 228 179 16 24DIVISION 4 30 23 14 16 15 11 277 270 200 153 12 16DIVISION 5 23 13 8 10 19 4 268 216 211 199 21 16DIVISION 6 11 16 2 1 10 14 210 160 114 123 14 6DIVISION 7 8 14 7 2 11 11 220 169 165 129 21 5NOT ASSIGNED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 45 46

DISTRICT III 34 15 6 7 33 29 296 247 413 363 79 101

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 55 61 72 64 74 70 1,039 995 739 619 148 199

DIVISION 1 23 31 18 21 46 43 345 358 290 191 38 65DIVISION 2 12 9 24 16 2 0 328 276 312 274 73 94DIVISION 3 20 21 30 27 26 27 366 361 137 154 37 40

DISTRICT V 14 19 18 63 43 55 173 146 395 323 38 33

DISTRICT VI 14 10 19 17 26 19 180 170 184 138 23 22

Page 114: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 5 OPINIONS WRITTEN

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

APPEALS ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS

TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE

COURT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 13,355 12,115 4,088 3,799 7,137 6,327 1,445 1,306 267 252 116 142 302 289

DISTRICT I - TOTAL 1,987 1,904 718 669 956 897 229 256 26 28 18 6 40 48

DIVISION 1 376 417 146 148 172 195 42 60 4 2 3 1 9 11DIVISION 2 431 413 150 142 210 195 54 66 6 2 2 1 9 7DIVISION 3 450 319 158 111 220 151 55 39 5 8 6 0 6 10DIVISION 4 399 414 139 146 194 199 45 49 7 7 5 2 9 11DIVISION 5 331 341 125 122 160 157 33 42 4 9 2 2 7 9

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 4,875 4,111 1,758 1,571 2,431 2,024 419 287 131 128 40 28 96 73

DIVISION 1 829 645 281 225 411 340 80 41 35 25 5 8 17 6DIVISION 2 735 558 267 197 352 288 71 42 20 18 9 4 16 9

1 DIVISION 3 699 664 227 257 364 306 73 59 12 21 7 3 16 1810 DIVISION 4 752 627 313 252 338 293 49 42 28 23 10 6 14 11DIVISION 5 709 568 266 222 350 285 58 42 18 11 3 4 14 4DIVISION 6 651 579 231 224 357 275 42 48 9 17 2 1 10 14DIVISION 7 500 470 173 194 259 237 46 13 9 13 4 2 9 11

DISTRICT III 1,474 1,369 353 378 889 774 159 166 34 15 6 7 33 29

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 3,051 2,771 940 740 1,559 1,490 392 382 52 54 38 39 70 66

DIVISION 1 1,263 1,230 290 296 714 656 175 186 23 30 16 20 45 42DIVISION 2 936 803 300 211 556 507 63 75 11 6 5 4 1 0DIVISION 3 852 738 350 233 289 327 154 121 18 18 17 15 24 24

DISTRICT V 1,222 1,156 135 175 878 710 145 141 13 18 9 57 42 55

DISTRICT VI 746 804 184 266 424 432 101 74 11 9 5 5 21 18

Page 115: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS OF APPEAL TABLE 6 PENDING APPEALS

TOTAL AND FULLY BRIEFEDAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

PENDING APPEALS* FULLY BRIEFED

TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL JUVENILE

COURT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 18,505 19,006 8,384 8,755 8,762 8,840 1,359 1,411 6,220 5,997 3,086 2,965 2,813 2,696 321 336

DISTRICT I - TOTAL 2,371 2,536 1,198 1,146 941 1,110 232 280 767 795 420 409 303 324 44 62

DIVISION 1 448 471 217 207 183 203 48 61 117 128 63 63 46 51 8 14DIVISION 2 569 591 288 269 225 260 56 62 219 250 117 130 91 101 11 19DIVISION 3 550 651 289 292 209 285 52 74 186 224 105 113 69 96 12 15DIVISION 4 458 455 239 215 179 192 40 48 135 111 78 65 52 41 5 5DIVISION 5 346 368 165 163 145 170 36 35 110 82 57 38 45 35 8 9

DISTRICT II - TOTAL 6,306 6,740 3,235 3,597 2,704 2,762 367 381 1,201 1,186 614 609 524 504 63 73

DIVISION 1 691 737 297 256 359 422 35 59 144 127 85 50 53 64 6 13 1 DIVISION 2 744 771 288 292 396 420 60 59 169 162 92 83 67 72 10 711 DIVISION 3 820 799 329 293 427 441 64 65 236 204 114 99 110 92 12 13DIVISION 4 771 848 291 391 422 411 58 46 197 257 91 174 93 77 13 6DIVISION 5 664 651 247 230 365 373 52 48 170 134 94 71 67 49 9 14DIVISION 6 487 603 229 255 237 312 21 36 106 184 49 79 52 92 5 13DIVISION 7 729 570 286 215 406 312 37 43 179 118 89 53 82 58 8 7NOT ASSIGNED 1,400 1,761 1,268 1,665 92 71 40 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DISTRICT III 1,741 1,809 617 572 978 1,078 146 159 709 688 256 234 421 430 32 24

DISTRICT IV - TOTAL 5,380 5,396 2,698 2,808 2,325 2,244 357 344 2,407 2,375 1,502 1,473 780 787 125 115

DIVISION 1 1,997 1,966 935 934 884 885 178 147 826 823 544 511 221 258 61 54DIVISION 2 1,520 1,558 631 715 805 778 84 65 490 600 243 330 220 252 27 18DIVISION 3 1,863 1,872 1,132 1,159 636 581 95 132 1,091 952 715 632 339 277 37 43

DISTRICT V 1,757 1,623 338 316 1,267 1,156 152 151 796 679 187 137 582 507 27 35

DISTRICT VI 950 902 298 316 547 490 105 96 340 274 107 103 203 144 30 27

* Includes appeals for which the record has not been filed

Page 116: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

NUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 805 789 1,160,589 1,193,917 r 933,260 943,822 r 597,010 627,350 r 272,108 251,290 r 64,142 65,182 r

ALAMEDA 34 34 37,187 39,093 r 37,225 39,400 r 27,587 29,936 r 6,883 6,734 r 2,755 2,730 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL — — 76 11 36 0 1 0 30 0 5 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL — — 98 12 30 36 r 24 36 r 1 0 5 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL — — 1,316 313 654 31 r 648 31 r 6 0 0 0 LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 206 150 r 206 150 r 0 0 0 0 OAKLAND MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 1,464 802 r 1,464 802 r 0 0 0 0 SAN LEANDRO MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 77 76 r 77 76 r 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 1 1 78 80 36 75 21 38 11 14 4 23 AMADOR 1 1 1,310 1,266 1,075 1,126 441 483 566 564 68 79 BUTTE 5 4 8,541 10,569 7,044 6,715 4,704 4,309 2,119 1,973 221 433

CALAVERAS 1 1 1,440 1,514 1,010 1,574 852 504 131 751 27 319 COLUSA 1 1 741 647 r 671 577 r 457 391 r 187 157 r 27 29 rCONTRA COSTA 18 17 27,596 28,334 22,810 22,290 15,458 15,480 5,954 5,592 1,398 1,218 BAY MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 13 18 13 7 0 1 0 10

1 DELTA MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 12 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL — — 4 0 29 15 24 2 0 5 5 8 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL — — 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 DEL NORTE 1 1 1,990 1,728 1,528 1,343 r 1,310 1,169 182 154 36 20 rEL DORADO 3 3 5,247 5,768 3,891 4,156 r 2,187 2,081 r 1,475 1,849 229 226 FRESNO 17 17 32,542 32,621 r 26,921 27,826 r 13,360 13,604 r 11,973 12,636 r 1,588 1,586 r

GLENN 1 1 707 i 1,137 545 i 1,125 464 i 913 52 i 134 29 i 78 HUMBOLDT 3 3 4,682 5,311 4,333 4,798 3,706 4,278 364 331 263 189 IMPERIAL 4 3 3,364 i 5,868 3,259 i 5,378 2,489 i 4,347 624 i 878 146 i 153 INYO 1 1 1,071 1,061 803 791 508 530 269 228 26 33 KERN 15 15 27,235 25,382 28,152 24,383 r 11,786 11,497 15,085 11,571 r 1,281 1,315 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL — — 162 22 223 16 34 2 111 0 78 14 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL — — 509 449 967 434 34 22 380 253 553 159 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL — — 41 1 77 0 31 0 46 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL — — 31 4 38 3 16 1 22 2 0 0 KINGS 3 3 4,827 5,037 4,294 3,901 3,963 3,211 168 492 163 198

LAKE 2 2 2,936 3,667 2,473 2,407 1,609 1,652 641 520 223 235 LASSEN 1 1 1,581 1,542 1,264 1,312 467 513 606 686 191 113 LOS ANGELES 238 238 337,697 343,620 227,337 237,870 r 144,074 170,533 64,781 48,293 r 18,482 19,044 rMADERA 3 3 5,595 5,230 3,663 3,670 2,708 2,829 880 759 75 82 MARIN 6 6 6,925 6,935 r 5,795 4,713 4,418 2,966 797 1,337 580 410 MARIPOSA 1 1 654 794 565 591 372 399 173 170 20 22 MENDOCINO 3 3 2,267 i 3,876 1,920 i 3,634 1,705 i 2,881 49 i 396 166 i 357 MERCED 3 3 7,973 7,869 5,580 6,013 4,829 5,027 645 877 106 109 MODOC 1 1 558 554 375 349 333 264 27 62 15 23 MONO 1 1 354 383 290 323 223 243 16 37 51 43

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 117: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

NUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 805 789 1,160,589 1,193,917 r 933,260 943,822 r 597,010 627,350 r 272,108 251,290 r 64,142 65,182 r

MONTEREY 8 8 13,601 16,019 13,824 12,357 9,758 8,445 3,390 3,499 676 413 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL — — 73 96 51 121 5 7 0 0 46 114 NAPA 4 3 3,967 4,071 r 3,344 3,532 2,511 2,647 667 698 166 187 NEVADA 3 3 2,793 2,907 2,600 2,303 2,243 1,984 239 225 118 94 ORANGE 61 59 78,697 78,865 67,917 69,770 32,651 36,426 30,457 27,281 4,809 6,063 PLACER 5 4 7,065 7,743 r 6,428 6,336 r 4,782 4,720 r 1,077 1,018 569 598 rPLUMAS 1 1 976 783 r 568 607 236 131 278 382 54 94 RIVERSIDE 26 24 56,012 49,362 37,765 35,236 15,617 14,922 18,754 15,975 3,394 4,339 SACRAMENTO 33 32 49,813 49,050 42,480 42,645 r 19,518 18,540 21,168 22,116 r 1,794 1,989 SAN BENITO 1 1 1,717 1,266 1,329 1,321 749 687 483 497 97 137

SAN BERNARDINO 30 28 61,560 62,930 49,402 46,708 32,492 29,868 15,372 15,280 1,538 1,560 SAN DIEGO 71 71 104,948 115,158 93,319 88,310 r 80,295 76,812 r 7,607 6,783 r 5,417 4,715 rEL CAJON MUNICIPAL — — 4,086 3,859 5,754 5,837 3,842 3,571 590 1,471 1,322 795 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL — — 0 2 66 20 0 0 21 0 45 20

1 SAN FRANCISCO 29 29 27,030 28,932 22,040 i 24,146 13,426 i 15,277 6,575 6,640 2,039 2,229 13 SAN JOAQUIN 13 13 20,461 20,194 15,873 16,484 6,701 7,340 7,634 7,844 1,538 1,300 SAN LUIS OBISPO 5 5 7,254 8,230 6,788 7,287 2,698 2,838 3,513 3,845 577 604 SAN MATEO 17 17 20,123 21,050 13,703 13,307 9,497 9,232 3,615 3,449 591 626 SANTA BARBARA 10 10 14,095 14,261 r 12,366 12,997 r 8,601 9,055 3,337 3,440 428 502 rSANTA CLARA 44 44 46,491 48,153 45,064 41,156 33,325 30,369 r 8,049 7,087 r 3,690 3,700

SANTA CRUZ 5 5 6,651 6,613 5,869 6,580 3,912 4,499 1,585 1,621 372 460 SHASTA 5 4 7,631 8,371 r 5,935 6,002 r 3,833 4,448 r 1,712 1,276 r 390 278 rSIERRA 1 1 148 172 116 98 80 63 27 23 9 12 SISKIYOU 1 1 2,518 2,153 1,418 1,491 1,145 1,054 150 295 123 142 SOLANO 9 7 13,916 14,298 10,451 11,531 6,054 6,432 3,525 4,363 872 736 SONOMA 9 9 14,016 14,359 11,073 12,245 8,546 9,064 2,146 2,852 381 329 STANISLAUS 9 8 15,571 17,969 16,469 16,330 10,584 10,745 4,511 4,762 1,374 823 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL — — 39 53 128 93 94 12 24 61 10 20 SUTTER 3 3 3,848 3,830 r 3,792 4,704 2,031 3,495 1,441 944 320 265 TEHAMA 2 2 2,853 2,824 2,052 1,928 1,348 1,199 635 629 69 100

TRINITY 1 1 120 i 649 92 i 591 55 i 314 23 i 188 14 i 89 TULARE 7 7 14,450 16,620 12,252 14,965 9,415 11,217 2,416 3,388 421 360 TULARE MUNICIPAL — — 217 262 r 218 211 r 195 191 r 4 0 19 20 rTUOLUMNE 2 2 2,391 2,810 r 2,476 2,718 r 1,801 2,027 r 499 466 r 176 225 rVENTURA 15 15 20,544 21,559 16,352 18,978 11,462 13,941 3,685 3,816 1,205 1,221 YOLO 4 4 4,659 4,580 r 4,132 3,896 r 2,395 2,064 r 1,181 1,208 556 624 rYUBA 3 3 2,920 3,166 3,058 3,056 2,489 2,507 464 412 105 137

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 118: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 2 PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 52,233 54,065 r 46,957 46,972 r 11,444 11,567 r 33,334 32,939 r 2,179 2,466 r

ALAMEDA 2,929 2,897 r 3,003 3,089 r 621 655 r 2,031 2,072 r 351 362 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 67 81 87 78 11 32 64 44 12 2 BUTTE 589 636 576 718 12 163 564 552 0 3 CALAVERAS 97 90 32 135 16 49 16 69 0 17 COLUSA 41 49 r 42 56 r 2 1 r 40 54 r 0 1

CONTRA COSTA 1,629 1,764 1,587 1,522 56 38 1,528 1,478 3 6 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 2 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

1 DEL NORTE 60 66 37 25 37 25 0 0 0 0 14 EL DORADO 314 279 167 149 5 12 162 137 0 0 FRESNO 1,154 1,235 1,115 1,191 107 102 957 1,038 51 51 GLENN 47 i 79 44 i 89 44 i 89 0 i 0 0 i 0

HUMBOLDT 347 473 307 322 297 312 3 7 7 3 IMPERIAL 126 i 168 108 i 132 46 i 25 61 i 105 1 i 2 INYO 42 40 31 39 15 17 13 18 3 4 KERN 926 989 645 706 2 0 641 698 2 8 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 18 5 0 0 5 0 13 5 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 142 178 124 97 25 16 98 81 1 0

LAKE 208 203 226 205 37 36 185 154 4 15 LASSEN 79 77 65 60 10 3 55 57 0 0 LOS ANGELES 12,654 13,628 12,547 12,497 r 872 921 11,609 11,286 r 66 290 rMADERA 238 218 208 180 206 180 0 0 2 0 MARIN 656 690 585 452 568 3 0 436 17 13 MARIPOSA 35 35 37 33 3 1 34 31 0 1 MENDOCINO 148 i 256 154 i 203 144 i 190 2 i 6 8 i 7 MERCED 281 392 315 260 314 260 1 0 0 0 MODOC 35 50 30 21 29 20 0 0 1 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 119: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 2 PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 52,233 54,065 r 46,957 46,972 r 11,444 11,567 r 33,334 32,939 r 2,179 2,466 r

MONO 21 19 14 11 11 11 1 0 2 0 MONTEREY 645 621 552 546 123 63 424 481 5 2 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 257 293 192 237 10 16 181 219 1 2 NEVADA 188 249 109 177 105 172 2 4 2 1 ORANGE 1,965 2,239 1,752 2,140 1,743 2,136 2 0 7 4 PLACER 369 472 r 368 427 359 423 3 2 6 2 PLUMAS 63 52 28 52 7 1 20 46 1 5 RIVERSIDE 2,050 2,262 2,286 1,853 400 284 1,839 1,537 47 32

SACRAMENTO 1,675 1,770 1,573 2,284 49 64 1,511 2,220 13 0 SAN BENITO 47 64 46 37 12 16 8 11 26 10 SAN BERNARDINO 1,854 1,882 1,421 1,680 364 501 855 901 202 278 SAN DIEGO 4,298 4,322 3,358 3,348 r 3,166 3,201 r 4 2 r 188 145 rEL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 SAN FRANCISCO 3,228 3,080 2,830 2,834 431 462 1,657 1,664 742 708 SAN JOAQUIN 1,308 1,223 1,246 1,123 292 252 918 827 36 44 SAN LUIS OBISPO 447 389 429 319 69 8 359 311 1 0

SAN MATEO 1,373 1,442 975 934 0 3 974 929 1 2 SANTA BARBARA 659 643 420 650 30 54 387 592 3 4 SANTA CLARA 2,715 2,514 3,061 1,814 138 149 2,717 1,387 206 278 SANTA CRUZ 529 557 497 552 56 52 429 481 12 19 SHASTA 375 401 r 144 85 28 25 113 58 3 2 SIERRA 7 5 7 5 5 3 0 2 2 0 SISKIYOU 136 183 121 91 121 88 0 3 0 0 SOLANO 607 615 496 555 68 46 396 488 32 21 SONOMA 895 905 693 758 148 147 542 610 3 1

STANISLAUS 594 635 598 566 29 19 546 532 23 15 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 231 208 207 161 14 6 171 124 22 31 TEHAMA 175 160 90 95 5 9 85 86 0 0 TRINITY 14 i 53 12 i 42 4 i 1 8 i 41 0 i 0 TULARE 512 529 369 397 5 6 362 386 2 5 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 107 145 r 114 132 r 3 7 r 106 120 r 5 5 rVENTURA 1,668 1,158 616 543 9 49 582 483 25 11

YOLO 198 215 84 104 r 23 8 r 60 66 1 30 rYUBA 176 185 154 146 137 134 2 0 15 12

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 120: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 3 FAMILY LAW FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 165,547 169,416 r 137,241 138,247 r 91,662 92,593 r 38,017 37,855 r 7,562 7,799 r

ALAMEDA 5,304 6,298 r 5,721 6,466 r 5,416 6,169 r 9 1 r 296 296 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 785 192 324 6 318 6 6 0 0 0 ALPINE 3 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 186 178 163 180 9 14 151 155 3 11 BUTTE 1,199 1,182 1,017 1,108 916 982 84 70 17 56 CALAVERAS 262 239 162 212 131 20 29 151 2 41 COLUSA 89 72 r 63 68 r 45 50 r 15 13 r 3 5 r

CONTRA COSTA 5,045 4,944 2,931 2,851 2,670 2,579 242 190 19 82 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 204 181 176 155 176 155 0 0 0 0 16 EL DORADO 983 936 607 677 579 656 22 21 6 0 FRESNO 4,175 4,084 2,940 3,534 2,636 3,058 223 366 81 110 GLENN 79 i 124 55 i 114 48 i 103 0 i 1 7 i 10

HUMBOLDT 985 944 585 577 568 564 9 10 8 3 IMPERIAL 369 i 464 373 i 486 308 i 453 29 i 25 36 i 8 INYO 389 417 316 293 290 270 19 16 7 7 KERN 3,499 3,647 3,055 2,904 r 705 594 1,915 1,878 r 435 432 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 35 4 0 0 9 0 26 4 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 333 407 779 401 27 20 303 243 449 138 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 645 668 561 514 508 476 7 3 46 35

LAKE 378 405 317 302 256 218 27 35 34 49 LASSEN 630 648 489 540 297 294 174 238 18 8 LOS ANGELES 37,501 38,026 33,032 33,363 25,852 25,826 5,872 6,101 1,308 1,436 MADERA 593 576 590 417 586 416 0 0 4 1 MARIN 1,198 1,243 1,126 912 1,033 832 43 21 50 59 MARIPOSA 79 101 63 92 57 80 4 8 2 4 MENDOCINO 320 i 506 287 i 436 258 i 350 8 i 58 21 i 28 MERCED 886 853 904 878 904 878 0 0 0 0 MODOC 85 105 80 66 79 65 0 0 1 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 121: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 3 FAMILY LAW FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 165,547 169,416 r 137,241 138,247 r 91,662 92,593 r 38,017 37,855 r 7,562 7,799 r

MONO 88 69 67 52 55 40 0 4 12 8 MONTEREY 1,561 1,787 2,056 1,397 873 138 1,158 1,222 25 37 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 619 606 539 478 505 402 15 49 19 27 NEVADA 516 616 473 497 457 486 6 5 10 6 ORANGE 12,372 12,284 9,515 9,367 1,132 1,178 7,733 6,935 650 1,254 PLACER 1,331 1,408 1,173 1,021 r 1,156 989 r 0 1 17 31 PLUMAS 122 104 88 136 23 7 58 109 7 20 RIVERSIDE 7,703 7,696 6,259 5,956 1,208 1,201 3,895 3,782 1,156 973

SACRAMENTO 9,416 10,009 5,153 5,153 423 649 4,729 4,434 1 70 SAN BENITO 229 238 193 218 191 212 0 4 2 2 SAN BERNARDINO 8,939 9,384 5,682 6,126 3,412 2,774 1,903 2,978 367 374 SAN DIEGO 15,649 15,767 12,387 13,589 11,701 12,756 336 416 350 417 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 3,046 2,870 2,456 2,634 2,391 2,582 31 14 34 38

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 SAN FRANCISCO 3,454 3,545 2,809 2,841 572 578 2,132 2,168 105 95 SAN JOAQUIN 2,666 2,788 2,178 2,436 1,152 1,260 841 1,005 185 171 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1,130 1,233 859 1,006 31 50 793 884 35 72

SAN MATEO 3,133 3,294 2,898 2,695 2,821 2,551 47 105 30 39 SANTA BARBARA 1,697 1,770 1,429 1,451 1,274 1,279 131 143 24 29 SANTA CLARA 7,863 8,035 8,114 7,053 6,513 6,633 1,329 256 272 164 SANTA CRUZ 1,180 1,261 972 993 744 778 213 200 15 15 SHASTA 1,210 1,157 956 986 r 562 540 312 356 r 82 90 rSIERRA 41 32 37 24 28 21 4 3 5 0 SISKIYOU 267 243 164 220 151 148 1 54 12 18 SOLANO 2,121 2,280 1,716 1,881 1,311 1,461 321 333 84 87 SONOMA 2,355 2,385 1,999 2,139 1,972 1,970 25 163 2 6

STANISLAUS 2,374 2,552 2,742 2,245 275 121 1,613 1,837 854 287 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 546 540 525 610 173 362 277 181 75 67 TEHAMA 389 405 255 363 132 227 111 106 12 30 TRINITY 23 i 101 21 i 57 16 i 30 1 i 9 4 i 18 TULARE 1,857 1,952 1,678 2,246 1,571 2,188 83 48 24 10 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 396 391 r 234 267 r 139 155 r 85 48 r 10 64 rVENTURA 3,791 3,893 3,102 3,213 2,726 2,808 322 246 54 159

YOLO 792 809 1,263 839 r 853 462 r 275 115 135 262 rYUBA 467 468 494 501 443 428 37 38 14 35

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 122: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 4 MOTOR VEHICLE PERSONAL INJURY, DEATH, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE

FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONSFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 43,908 47,841 r 46,846 53,010 r 45,289 51,401 r 661 713 r 896 896 r

ALAMEDA 2,063 2,147 2,089 2,095 r 2,038 2,047 r 28 28 r 23 20 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 6 5 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 31 42 31 43 29 41 1 2 1 0 BUTTE 241 247 268 325 254 317 7 6 7 2 CALAVERAS 28 28 28 24 24 24 1 0 3 0 COLUSA 14 22 r 18 19 r 16 19 r 1 0 1 0

CONTRA COSTA 1,101 1,110 1,167 1,221 1,148 1,191 4 8 15 22 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEL NORTE 25 16 18 15 17 15 0 0 1 0 EL DORADO 228 241 241 211 234 206 4 0 3 5 FRESNO 1,059 1,255 1,142 1,203 1,125 1,178 2 2 15 23 GLENN 6 i 25 10 i 25 9 i 25 0 i 0 1 i 0

HUMBOLDT 143 80 105 93 96 89 0 2 9 2 IMPERIAL 77 i 118 57 i 97 56 i 89 0 i 4 1 i 4 INYO 10 15 10 19 8 16 1 1 1 2 KERN 664 631 714 714 669 677 26 18 19 19 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 81 82 78 77 75 74 1 1 2 2

LAKE 54 47 54 34 51 33 1 0 2 1 LASSEN 25 15 14 23 13 18 0 2 1 3 LOS ANGELES 12,332 14,578 14,088 17,592 13,809 17,295 71 90 208 207 MADERA 88 92 78 80 77 78 1 1 0 1 MARIN 458 479 422 344 404 330 6 4 12 10 MARIPOSA 15 14 21 29 20 28 1 1 0 0 MENDOCINO 53 i 73 53 i 55 53 i 53 0 i 0 0 i 2 MERCED 175 221 158 185 156 183 0 0 2 2 MODOC 4 7 5 1 4 1 1 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 123: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 4 MOTOR VEHICLE PERSONAL INJURY, DEATH, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE

FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONSFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 43,908 47,841 r 46,846 53,010 r 45,289 51,401 r 661 713 r 896 896 r

MONO 3 4 3 7 3 7 0 0 0 0 MONTEREY 418 425 394 410 340 378 42 24 12 8 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 124 160 139 149 133 141 0 1 6 7 NEVADA 94 86 82 96 81 93 0 0 1 3 ORANGE 4,374 5,014 4,907 7,230 4,769 7,078 45 64 93 88 PLACER 391 310 508 270 499 265 2 1 7 4 PLUMAS 15 8 10 9 10 8 0 0 0 1 RIVERSIDE 1,369 1,610 1,364 1,704 1,302 1,601 22 44 40 59

SACRAMENTO 2,822 2,813 3,189 2,372 3,131 2,332 26 28 32 12 SAN BENITO 32 24 18 32 14 31 0 0 4 1 SAN BERNARDINO 2,052 2,172 2,637 2,824 2,579 2,759 12 18 46 47

1 SAN DIEGO 3,180 3,291 3,289 3,255 3,154 3,137 27 12 108 106 19 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 SAN FRANCISCO 2,192 2,377 1,671 i 1,843 1,616 i 1,794 14 6 41 43 SAN JOAQUIN 573 536 472 467 420 397 44 54 8 16 SAN LUIS OBISPO 219 212 198 208 188 190 5 6 5 12

SAN MATEO 979 1,020 754 803 719 770 22 20 13 13 SANTA BARBARA 382 396 401 438 327 383 57 39 17 16 SANTA CLARA 2,196 2,350 2,243 2,318 2,182 2,268 28 25 33 25 SANTA CRUZ 293 311 381 558 369 538 0 5 12 15 SHASTA 269 278 r 342 245 r 328 228 r 7 14 7 3 SIERRA 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 51 7 46 34 45 33 0 0 1 1 SOLANO 294 345 311 387 307 376 3 8 1 3 SONOMA 625 379 437 414 432 406 1 2 4 6

STANISLAUS 573 606 689 737 586 603 87 108 16 26 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 4 SUTTER 138 150 133 190 125 187 5 1 3 2 TEHAMA 41 37 37 46 33 42 4 3 0 1 TRINITY 2 i 6 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 TULARE 335 329 301 340 271 323 11 13 19 4 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 47 60 r 68 73 r 60 67 r 5 1 3 5 rVENTURA 665 665 714 750 663 694 22 30 29 26

YOLO 99 158 107 131 92 107 12 14 3 10 YUBA 77 112 125 140 123 136 1 2 1 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 124: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 5 OTHER PERSONAL INJURY, DEATH, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE

FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONSFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 26,131 29,639 r 29,194 33,290 r 27,265 31,340 r 730 806 r 1,199 1,144 r

ALAMEDA 1,160 1,317 r 1,317 1,354 r 1,218 1,246 r 79 88 r 20 20 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 6 6 2 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 20 28 23 21 20 19 1 2 2 0 BUTTE 118 129 147 190 133 182 9 4 5 4 CALAVERAS 19 12 11 9 10 9 0 0 1 0 COLUSA 9 13 r 12 17 r 11 13 r 1 2 r 0 2 r

CONTRA COSTA 526 542 532 628 505 603 5 9 22 16 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 18 11 14 1 14 1 0 0 0 0 20 EL DORADO 132 166 158 139 150 132 2 1 6 6 FRESNO 487 529 524 521 509 498 3 0 12 23 GLENN 8 i 14 9 i 17 9 i 17 0 i 0 0 i 0

HUMBOLDT 64 51 55 54 46 46 2 6 7 2 IMPERIAL 43 i 112 51 i 92 42 i 87 4 i 3 5 i 2 INYO 5 7 6 13 6 12 0 0 0 1 KERN 367 296 345 415 314 388 15 11 16 16 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 53 49 37 46 32 43 2 3 3 0

LAKE 26 31 31 23 25 22 1 1 5 0 LASSEN 17 20 12 23 8 16 2 4 2 3 LOS ANGELES 8,476 11,092 10,258 12,801 9,795 12,349 93 105 370 347 MADERA 48 64 55 47 52 46 1 1 2 0 MARIN 233 249 302 260 281 246 11 7 10 7 MARIPOSA 9 13 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 MENDOCINO 32 i 46 24 i 66 24 i 60 0 i 2 0 i 4 MERCED 68 73 74 90 73 88 0 0 1 2 MODOC 4 6 8 1 8 1 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 125: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 5 OTHER PERSONAL INJURY, DEATH, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE

FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONSFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 26,131 29,639 r 29,194 33,290 r 27,265 31,340 r 730 806 r 1,199 1,144 r

MONO 7 14 5 16 5 14 0 1 0 1 MONTEREY 230 264 233 276 199 235 26 30 8 11 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 65 91 79 129 77 120 0 1 2 8 NEVADA 56 75 73 80 65 76 0 1 8 3 ORANGE 2,478 2,843 2,878 3,466 2,693 3,241 43 59 142 166 PLACER 212 167 247 187 r 237 175 r 1 1 9 11 PLUMAS 7 11 8 10 7 4 0 2 1 4 RIVERSIDE 664 683 758 966 673 862 45 43 40 61

SACRAMENTO 1,413 1,254 1,831 1,263 1,745 1,199 43 39 43 25 SAN BENITO 22 20 17 35 15 33 0 1 2 1 SAN BERNARDINO 1,210 1,331 1,633 1,775 1,566 1,736 14 9 53 30 SAN DIEGO 1,546 1,611 1,624 1,684 1,507 1,588 18 14 99 82 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 9 1 21 SAN FRANCISCO 1,509 1,603 1,227 i 1,309 1,103 i 1,207 53 28 71 74 SAN JOAQUIN 278 347 312 317 240 234 48 64 24 19 SAN LUIS OBISPO 163 183 168 201 150 170 10 10 8 21

SAN MATEO 489 616 415 494 387 472 14 14 14 8 SANTA BARBARA 314 295 278 373 216 298 50 66 12 9 SANTA CLARA 1,136 1,242 1,209 1,193 1,146 1,133 31 34 32 26 SANTA CRUZ 138 161 202 354 188 333 6 4 8 17 SHASTA 147 177 231 177 r 215 163 r 6 6 10 8 SIERRA 1 13 5 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 SISKIYOU 68 84 40 50 39 35 0 4 1 11 SOLANO 342 210 208 260 202 252 2 5 4 3 SONOMA 395 141 150 323 140 310 1 2 9 11

STANISLAUS 195 218 197 380 142 315 29 49 26 16 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 SUTTER 62 70 63 82 55 72 5 5 3 5 TEHAMA 35 43 32 28 27 27 2 1 3 0 TRINITY 1 i 3 0 i 2 0 i 1 0 i 0 0 i 1 TULARE 133 136 143 161 124 143 8 9 11 9 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 36 58 r 61 82 r 53 77 r 4 3 r 4 2 rVENTURA 708 659 701 643 619 556 36 50 46 37

YOLO 82 82 72 56 70 51 2 1 0 4 YUBA 41 58 66 76 63 73 0 1 3 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 126: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 6 EMINENT DOMAIN FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,326 1,370 r 1,141 1,075 r 969 790 r 87 213 r 85 72 r

ALAMEDA 9 23 r 22 56 r 16 51 r 5 2 r 1 3 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 0 0 0 13 0 12 0 1 0 0 BUTTE 0 6 4 7 0 7 0 0 4 0 CALAVERAS 1 6 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 COLUSA 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 57 60 60 80 56 75 0 0 4 5 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 EL DORADO 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 FRESNO 54 70 56 26 54 21 1 0 1 5 GLENN 1 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0

HUMBOLDT 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPERIAL 0 i 0 9 i 1 9 i 0 0 i 1 0 i 0 INYO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KERN 0 42 13 17 11 15 2 1 0 1 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAKE 9 16 5 15 4 15 1 0 0 0 LASSEN 2 8 3 6 3 6 0 0 0 0 LOS ANGELES 92 207 68 31 58 25 1 2 9 4 MADERA 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 MARIN 2 3 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 MARIPOSA 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MENDOCINO 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 MERCED 2 2 16 16 15 11 1 0 0 5 MODOC 0 9 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 127: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 6 EMINENT DOMAIN FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,326 1,370 r 1,141 1,075 r 969 790 r 87 213 r 85 72 r

MONO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MONTEREY 2 2 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEVADA 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 ORANGE 469 346 263 269 209 119 38 136 16 14 PLACER 3 7 10 4 9 4 0 0 1 0 PLUMAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE 79 60 29 73 15 46 8 18 6 9

SACRAMENTO 34 19 37 39 22 23 11 14 4 2 SAN BENITO 3 3 3 4 2 2 0 2 1 0 SAN BERNARDINO 33 45 37 51 31 47 3 2 3 2 SAN DIEGO 168 253 237 159 224 150 2 5 11 4 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 SAN FRANCISCO 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN 29 3 22 1 3 1 9 0 10 0 SAN LUIS OBISPO 6 25 8 22 7 13 1 8 0 1

SAN MATEO 13 16 6 12 6 8 0 4 0 0 SANTA BARBARA 7 21 16 31 10 22 2 4 4 5 SANTA CLARA 53 13 22 16 19 13 1 1 2 2 SANTA CRUZ 7 2 8 7 7 7 0 0 1 0 SHASTA 0 0 2 15 r 1 14 0 0 1 1 rSIERRA 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOLANO 0 16 3 10 2 7 0 3 1 0 SONOMA 0 10 20 16 20 13 0 2 0 1

STANISLAUS 3 9 6 16 6 9 0 4 0 3 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 7 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 TEHAMA 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 TRINITY 1 i 7 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 TULARE 133 1 114 2 114 2 0 0 0 0 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 VENTURA 14 18 13 23 8 18 0 2 5 3

YOLO 11 12 7 14 7 14 0 0 0 0 YUBA 1 6 5 3 5 3 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 128: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 7 OTHER CIVIL COMPLAINTS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 115,058 121,515 r 96,128 104,487 r 79,245 86,538 r 13,460 14,442 r 3,423 3,507 r

ALAMEDA 8,471 8,842 r 8,939 9,872 r 8,590 9,509 r 235 242 r 114 121 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 19 18 3 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 323 355 229 346 95 134 133 199 1 13 BUTTE 386 433 300 500 243 432 39 36 18 32 CALAVERAS 617 533 565 696 547 249 12 340 6 107 COLUSA 298 151 r 269 142 r 251 134 r 13 5 r 5 3 r

CONTRA COSTA 2,735 2,742 2,515 2,572 1,988 2,003 391 492 136 77 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 3 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

1 DEL NORTE 71 83 50 26 47 26 0 0 3 0 24 EL DORADO 319 312 338 283 309 235 15 37 14 11 FRESNO 11,291 11,969 9,284 9,840 1,628 1,630 7,518 8,067 138 143 GLENN 26 i 65 30 i 58 30 i 56 0 i 0 0 i 2

HUMBOLDT 980 1,491 1,493 1,459 1,436 1,415 26 19 31 25 IMPERIAL 922 i 2,762 844 i 2,341 826 i 2,296 13 i 36 5 i 9 INYO 37 29 18 30 13 22 5 4 0 4 KERN 1,002 1,002 1,032 1,112 909 948 79 111 44 53 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 82 0 95 0 1 0 34 0 60 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 105 110 90 105 86 88 2 4 2 13

LAKE 140 140 115 120 102 112 9 4 4 4 LASSEN 97 68 63 47 43 22 14 19 6 6 LOS ANGELES 31,649 28,312 23,034 25,224 21,867 23,896 488 617 679 711 MADERA 278 244 115 104 104 98 3 1 8 5 MARIN 1,332 1,390 822 665 684 576 46 73 92 16 MARIPOSA 30 25 17 48 12 37 3 11 2 0 MENDOCINO 147 i 232 117 i 181 102 i 154 4 i 7 11 i 20 MERCED 243 236 125 179 111 153 2 4 12 22 MODOC 27 24 18 13 14 12 1 1 3 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 129: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 7 OTHER CIVIL COMPLAINTS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 115,058 121,515 r 96,128 104,487 r 79,245 86,538 r 13,460 14,442 r 3,423 3,507 r

MONO 46 52 40 51 28 34 0 6 12 11 MONTEREY 2,844 3,080 2,595 2,675 2,242 2,342 295 292 58 41 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 756 795 652 641 620 610 12 11 20 20 NEVADA 176 281 170 166 156 152 5 8 9 6 ORANGE 8,331 8,470 7,531 9,863 5,974 8,187 1,170 1,274 387 402 PLACER 514 525 449 411 r 423 387 r 3 3 23 21 PLUMAS 35 50 32 43 17 16 11 17 4 10 RIVERSIDE 4,708 5,722 3,895 4,208 2,872 3,402 802 541 221 265

SACRAMENTO 4,055 4,818 4,684 2,788 4,197 2,356 415 359 72 73 SAN BENITO 75 85 44 61 30 48 4 5 10 8 SAN BERNARDINO 2,790 3,162 3,291 3,627 3,026 3,325 166 208 99 94 SAN DIEGO 8,237 8,722 7,391 7,945 6,876 7,496 134 90 381 359 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 8 6

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 SAN FRANCISCO 3,457 3,408 2,022 i 2,228 1,720 i 1,820 204 237 98 171 SAN JOAQUIN 1,338 1,226 702 623 502 452 151 113 49 58 SAN LUIS OBISPO 618 630 622 574 409 401 152 112 61 61

SAN MATEO 3,035 3,069 842 905 777 814 35 40 30 51 SANTA BARBARA 724 755 702 735 532 551 137 145 33 39 SANTA CLARA 4,033 3,279 3,114 2,943 2,908 2,701 117 154 89 88 SANTA CRUZ 601 594 638 1,014 537 902 73 79 28 33 SHASTA 299 349 r 358 312 r 313 278 r 18 18 27 16 SIERRA 56 54 17 9 14 8 2 1 1 0 SISKIYOU 843 54 474 46 471 32 0 9 3 5 SOLANO 575 571 480 530 404 455 62 51 14 24 SONOMA 881 1,391 1,087 1,278 1,046 1,233 22 19 19 26

STANISLAUS 1,073 5,301 803 799 722 693 27 46 54 60 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 4 8 0 0 1 0 3 8 SUTTER 194 220 200 1,118 109 1,055 57 42 34 21 TEHAMA 163 151 91 93 61 74 21 18 9 1 TRINITY 9 i 28 5 i 32 5 i 19 0 i 5 0 i 8 TULARE 906 800 481 694 409 587 46 81 26 26 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 104 70 r 99 127 r 83 109 r 13 12 r 3 6 rVENTURA 1,372 1,733 1,510 1,635 1,362 1,478 60 84 88 73

YOLO 378 367 r 372 155 r 176 122 r 157 27 r 39 6 rYUBA 205 135 194 174 181 159 3 5 10 10

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 130: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 8 OTHER CIVIL PETITIONS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 403,334 429,830 r 270,190 250,041 r 163,882 167,235 r 98,360 76,492 r 7,948 6,314 r

ALAMEDA 5,228 5,673 r 5,550 5,771 r 5,272 5,507 r 278 263 r 0 1 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 76 11 31 0 1 0 30 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 98 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 531 121 298 4 298 4 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 227 214 136 149 114 109 13 24 9 16 BUTTE 3,194 4,950 2,391 1,378 2,118 1,072 258 255 15 51 CALAVERAS 190 310 90 147 36 21 52 57 2 69 COLUSA 41 133 r 29 78 r 14 60 r 15 18 r 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 7,115 7,722 5,825 5,843 4,543 4,758 1,130 1,065 152 20 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

1 DEL NORTE 938 706 639 552 639 552 0 0 0 0 26 EL DORADO 2,193 2,735 1,455 1,803 530 474 918 1,323 7 6 FRESNO 3,424 3,525 1,642 1,876 1,295 1,510 314 334 33 32 GLENN 359 i 530 256 i 456 256 i 456 0 i 0 0 i 0

HUMBOLDT 1,095 1,338 1,208 1,335 904 1,196 195 122 109 17 IMPERIAL 520 i 555 713 i 572 391 i 196 316 i 370 6 i 6 INYO 144 146 107 102 64 58 36 39 7 5 KERN 12,363 9,870 14,147 10,165 4,687 3,803 9,457 6,359 3 3 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 58 28 77 16 0 0 33 10 44 6 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 2,215 2,452 2,023 1,773 1,961 1,692 30 42 32 39

LAKE 1,674 2,268 1,265 1,218 1,002 1,027 239 152 24 39 LASSEN 215 230 198 211 43 52 153 159 2 0 LOS ANGELES 126,949 134,924 49,215 42,389 14,760 25,428 33,439 15,887 1,016 1,074 MADERA 1,401 1,574 967 1,130 966 1,130 0 0 1 0 MARIN 1,367 1,137 721 420 597 213 70 205 54 2 MARIPOSA 273 327 210 142 163 118 36 15 11 9 MENDOCINO 643 i 1,350 602 i 1,421 545 i 1,224 16 i 101 41 i 96 MERCED 3,902 3,753 2,547 2,571 2,544 2,570 2 0 1 1 MODOC 260 227 140 126 136 121 1 1 3 4

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 131: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 8 OTHER CIVIL PETITIONS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 403,334 429,830 r 270,190 250,041 r 163,882 167,235 r 98,360 76,492 r 7,948 6,314 r

MONO 63 74 51 54 36 36 0 6 15 12 MONTEREY 4,253 6,118 4,998 4,011 4,104 3,347 636 565 258 99 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 948 838 811 735 622 617 174 109 15 9 NEVADA 1,083 882 1,082 579 1,074 573 7 4 1 2 ORANGE 23,935 24,600 19,146 15,285 4,504 3,214 14,327 11,804 315 267 PLACER 2,020 2,610 1,730 1,935 1,415 1,634 1 0 314 301 PLUMAS 563 360 r 269 208 105 30 143 147 21 31 RIVERSIDE 22,351 16,380 10,806 7,361 3,643 2,142 6,961 4,622 202 597

SACRAMENTO 15,730 16,035 11,667 14,178 2,685 4,473 8,370 9,084 612 621 SAN BENITO 808 278 414 291 233 136 152 101 29 54 SAN BERNARDINO 26,391 26,549 18,247 14,811 11,855 8,969 6,232 5,802 160 40 SAN DIEGO 45,658 55,928 39,314 32,781 37,949 32,344 817 230 548 207 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 2,212 2,177 415 0 558 1,456 1,239 721

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 SAN FRANCISCO 5,757 6,821 4,314 5,411 3,737 4,875 425 367 152 169 SAN JOAQUIN 9,192 9,415 6,309 7,096 2,047 2,700 3,700 4,272 562 124 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2,428 3,182 2,129 2,633 729 801 1,336 1,786 64 46

SAN MATEO 3,065 3,508 2,585 2,470 2,578 2,462 1 8 6 0 SANTA BARBARA 5,396 5,635 4,642 4,752 3,942 3,999 677 691 23 62 SANTA CLARA 12,746 15,106 11,136 9,408 9,009 7,166 1,430 1,642 697 600 SANTA CRUZ 2,138 2,240 1,902 1,967 1,427 1,389 346 388 129 190 SHASTA 2,362 3,138 r 1,610 2,008 r 1,160 1,829 r 388 164 62 15 SIERRA 2 7 4 9 1 5 3 2 0 2 SISKIYOU 628 1,172 125 622 122 521 1 97 2 4 SOLANO 5,521 6,173 3,566 4,243 1,611 1,776 1,795 2,362 160 105 SONOMA 5,215 5,594 3,796 4,278 3,415 3,513 281 754 100 11

STANISLAUS 7,278 4,792 7,456 7,133 7,058 6,738 339 383 59 12 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 1,619 1,662 1,495 1,520 703 1,074 663 358 129 88 TEHAMA 1,246 1,205 855 641 772 517 82 113 1 11 TRINITY 35 i 316 20 i 278 12 i 159 5 i 94 3 i 25 TULARE 6,694 8,687 6,360 7,856 6,048 7,124 310 728 2 4 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 1,067 1,467 r 1,254 1,412 r 1,125 1,263 r 103 113 r 26 36 rVENTURA 7,171 8,635 5,145 7,660 4,051 6,581 846 877 248 202

YOLO 2,288 2,170 r 1,121 1,337 r 703 663 r 207 539 r 211 135 rYUBA 990 1,432 1,136 1,247 1,113 1,211 13 23 10 13

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 132: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 9 MENTAL HEALTH FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 7,631 7,616 r 6,383 6,958 r 2,239 2,437 r 3,139 3,313 r 1,005 1,208 r

ALAMEDA 140 87 r 144 86 r 134 81 r 3 0 7 5 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 9 10 4 7 0 0 2 6 2 1 BUTTE 82 94 45 18 24 3 14 13 7 2 CALAVERAS 8 11 4 18 1 5 3 12 0 1 COLUSA 1 1 r 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 331 296 214 198 19 43 187 148 8 7 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 EL DORADO 10 14 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 0 FRESNO 156 201 26 13 1 1 25 11 0 1 GLENN 0 i 1 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0

HUMBOLDT 9 25 13 32 1 9 7 5 5 18 IMPERIAL 4 i 16 5 i 26 0 i 1 5 i 25 0 i 0 INYO 2 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 KERN 292 406 321 392 23 15 242 270 56 107 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 107 22 109 0 1 0 92 0 16 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 34 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 17 1 48 0 3 0 45 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 22 3 22 2 0 0 22 2 0 0 KINGS 31 16 18 18 11 12 6 5 1 1

LAKE 37 49 29 47 0 2 25 44 4 1 LASSEN 5 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 LOS ANGELES 785 814 425 579 34 31 292 439 99 109 MADERA 45 76 30 44 0 0 29 44 1 0 MARIN 133 22 139 19 51 4 76 7 12 8 MARIPOSA 10 9 9 20 0 0 9 20 0 0 MENDOCINO 43 i 64 39 i 86 21 i 11 14 i 22 4 i 53 MERCED 28 57 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 MODOC 4 3 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 133: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 9 MENTAL HEALTH FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 7,631 7,616 r 6,383 6,958 r 2,239 2,437 r 3,139 3,313 r 1,005 1,208 r

MONO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MONTEREY 76 104 90 107 28 46 42 33 20 28 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 76 102 95 70 59 33 10 22 26 15 NEVADA 18 16 14 25 7 7 6 16 1 2 ORANGE 1,850 1,924 1,636 2,045 1,439 1,787 58 61 139 197 PLACER 91 87 101 88 8 5 57 67 36 16 PLUMAS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE 357 298 300 258 93 73 171 140 36 45

SACRAMENTO 163 183 232 276 0 1 232 275 0 0 SAN BENITO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN BERNARDINO 109 150 145 167 37 38 55 70 53 59 SAN DIEGO 365 376 347 460 6 0 340 441 1 19 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 SAN FRANCISCO 88 122 136 167 0 0 136 152 0 15 SAN JOAQUIN 188 183 168 211 22 19 47 68 99 124 SAN LUIS OBISPO 270 261 261 256 36 28 45 30 180 198

SAN MATEO 165 194 102 39 9 8 22 0 71 31 SANTA BARBARA 97 86 97 104 10 11 77 73 10 20 SANTA CLARA 124 147 149 151 32 41 109 106 8 4 SANTA CRUZ 2 3 3 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 SHASTA 63 1 40 1 20 0 20 0 0 1 SIERRA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOLANO 147 127 154 164 29 29 109 117 16 18 SONOMA 530 423 122 155 0 0 120 152 2 3

STANISLAUS 210 232 210 232 15 65 183 163 12 4 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 39 53 39 58 16 1 23 57 0 0 SUTTER 49 25 52 18 27 0 16 10 9 8 TEHAMA 1 0 8 14 0 1 6 8 2 5 TRINITY 1 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 TULARE 44 36 47 18 0 0 47 18 0 0 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 42 54 r 45 54 r 2 2 r 25 28 r 18 24 rVENTURA 91 63 86 116 4 5 52 92 30 19

YOLO 16 29 32 45 7 4 14 14 11 27 YUBA 11 32 11 42 4 10 6 21 1 11

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 134: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 10 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARINGFILINGS TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 105,539 105,674 r 68,032 65,146 r 37,507 40,528 r 89,411 89,647 r 13,233 12,588 r 64,644 65,211 r 11,534 11,848 r

ALAMEDA 3,536 3,726 r 2,450 2,546 r 1,086 1,180 r 3,626 3,763 r 83 114 3,229 3,112 r 314 537 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 17 23 16 20 1 3 9 31 2 11 7 12 0 8 AMADOR 220 200 103 122 117 78 234 138 51 21 176 108 7 9 BUTTE 903 768 510 485 393 283 705 661 18 29 666 608 21 24 CALAVERAS 115 84 98 82 17 2 9 89 1 7 6 71 2 11 COLUSA 113 61 r 59 31 r 54 30 r 96 72 r 1 6 r 83 55 r 12 11 r

CONTRA COSTA 2,496 2,795 1,845 1,924 651 871 2,403 2,287 54 89 2,177 2,035 172 163 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 168 168 77 91 91 77 171 145 r 10 25 146 116 15 4 r30 EL DORADO 522 529 325 357 197 172 484 419 139 96 309 280 36 43 FRESNO 3,614 3,111 r 2,451 2,209 r 1,163 902 r 3,242 2,653 r 221 130 r 2,594 2,106 r 427 417 rGLENN 49 i 92 44 i 73 5 i 19 51 i 138 0 i 0 33 i 96 18 i 42

HUMBOLDT 455 421 280 243 175 178 138 198 117 152 11 26 10 20 IMPERIAL 530 i 771 372 i 515 158 i 256 501 i 681 310 i 426 153 i 201 38 i 54 INYO 258 259 136 152 122 107 194 158 5 9 186 146 3 3 KERN 2,072 2,317 1,343 1,554 729 763 1,984 2,090 113 176 1,785 1,822 86 92 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 519 567 292 357 227 210 520 488 486 140 19 330 15 18

LAKE 207 236 120 121 87 115 205 201 20 36 114 106 71 59 LASSEN 220 225 170 177 50 48 189 181 15 10 159 160 15 11 LOS ANGELES 27,629 26,742 16,510 13,878 11,119 12,864 21,954 22,325 3,323 3,628 12,129 12,378 6,502 6,319 MADERA 1,690 1,403 700 606 990 797 953 899 128 194 816 688 9 17 MARIN 547 716 390 413 157 303 539 650 131 74 342 515 66 61 MARIPOSA 95 89 85 72 10 17 89 79 5 6 83 72 1 1 MENDOCINO 439 i 697 220 i 312 219 i 385 317 i 513 292 i 343 3 i 150 22 i 20 MERCED 1,164 1,061 837 687 327 374 662 624 54 27 583 592 25 5 MODOC 72 55 67 51 5 4 60 56 40 4 18 40 2 12

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 135: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 10 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARINGFILINGS TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 105,539 105,674 r 68,032 65,146 r 37,507 40,528 r 89,411 89,647 r 13,233 12,588 r 64,644 65,211 r 11,534 11,848 r

MONO 40 46 38 46 2 0 30 33 19 18 11 15 0 0 MONTEREY 1,297 1,489 722 860 575 629 1,143 1,102 203 177 748 845 192 80 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 364 346 204 206 160 140 277 258 22 24 241 220 14 14 NEVADA 282 281 187 206 95 75 264 293 63 108 187 173 14 12 ORANGE 6,426 6,895 4,334 4,528 2,092 2,367 5,641 6,143 21 22 5,170 5,633 450 488 PLACER 1,098 1,164 514 708 584 456 897 1,118 r 132 308 r 742 800 23 10 PLUMAS 71 85 71 83 0 2 54 61 4 3 46 45 4 13 RIVERSIDE 4,699 5,170 3,052 2,991 1,647 2,179 4,402 4,317 508 302 3,752 3,595 142 420

SACRAMENTO 5,283 4,500 3,199 2,294 2,084 2,206 5,415 5,461 r 576 687 4,528 4,435 r 311 339 SAN BENITO 186 254 116 140 70 114 317 360 1 4 309 323 7 33 SAN BERNARDINO 4,164 4,245 3,347 3,436 817 809 1,912 1,886 0 0 1,912 1,884 0 2 SAN DIEGO 5,096 4,824 5,096 4,824 0 0 4,873 4,408 162 188 3,799 3,401 912 819 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 SAN FRANCISCO 1,875 1,915 1,101 1,187 774 728 1,495 1,428 248 192 1,127 1,071 120 165 SAN JOAQUIN 1,936 1,653 1,117 1,021 819 632 1,593 1,448 193 310 1,343 1,048 57 90 SAN LUIS OBISPO 710 757 532 560 178 197 791 630 145 61 628 557 18 12

SAN MATEO 4,703 4,784 1,653 1,494 3,050 3,290 2,362 2,281 0 0 2,244 2,146 118 135 SANTA BARBARA 2,692 2,485 r 1,929 1,562 763 923 r 2,467 2,340 730 722 1,693 1,567 44 51 SANTA CLARA 3,880 3,932 2,634 2,518 1,246 1,414 5,149 5,378 2,681 1,820 2,033 3,103 435 455 SANTA CRUZ 727 594 505 434 222 160 438 405 21 36 416 366 1 3 SHASTA 1,814 1,802 r 1,348 1,252 r 466 550 1,477 1,366 r 672 817 r 730 512 r 75 37 SIERRA 16 40 15 40 1 0 24 27 7 10 17 13 0 4 SISKIYOU 107 113 107 87 0 26 190 150 20 4 121 98 49 48 SOLANO 1,714 1,510 1,073 1,053 641 457 1,220 1,073 322 88 787 854 111 131 SONOMA 1,484 1,616 1,013 1,185 471 431 1,207 1,272 161 229 998 990 48 53

STANISLAUS 1,955 2,041 1,349 1,391 606 650 1,661 1,777 176 246 1,381 1,409 104 122 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 198 175 198 134 0 41 251 214 45 53 199 160 7 1 TEHAMA 301 379 123 180 178 199 296 284 26 37 258 228 12 19 TRINITY 10 i 34 10 i 34 0 i 0 16 i 80 4 i 22 8 i 36 4 i 22 TULARE 2,194 2,645 1,380 1,711 814 934 1,631 2,053 313 319 1,207 1,646 111 88 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 176 143 r 114 100 r 62 43 r 187 162 r 0 1 r 141 134 r 46 27 rVENTURA 1,801 1,948 1,075 1,344 726 604 1,681 1,628 68 0 1,487 1,521 126 107

YOLO 269 396 209 276 60 120 423 363 54 0 287 289 82 74 YUBA 321 297 167 183 154 114 291 306 17 25 267 269 7 12

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 136: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 11 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY FILINGS BY TYPE

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

§ 601 W & I § 602 W & I

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,042 816 974 752 68 64 104,497 104,858 r 67,058 64,394 r 37,439 40,464 r

ALAMEDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,536 3,726 r 2,450 2,546 r 1,086 1,180 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 6 0 5 0 1 0 11 23 11 20 0 3 AMADOR 21 13 15 11 6 2 199 187 88 111 111 76 BUTTE 0 1 0 1 0 0 903 767 510 484 393 283 CALAVERAS 4 0 1 0 3 0 111 84 97 82 14 2 COLUSA 6 0 5 0 1 0 107 61 r 54 31 r 53 30 r

CONTRA COSTA 66 24 66 24 0 0 2,430 2,771 1,779 1,900 651 871 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 1 0 1 0 0 0 167 168 76 91 91 77 32 EL DORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 522 529 325 357 197 172 FRESNO 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,614 3,111 r 2,451 2,209 r 1,163 902 rGLENN 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 49 i 92 44 i 73 5 i 19

HUMBOLDT 1 0 1 0 0 0 454 421 279 243 175 178 IMPERIAL 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 530 i 771 372 i 515 158 i 256 INYO 3 5 3 5 0 0 255 254 133 147 122 107 KERN 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,072 2,317 1,343 1,554 729 763 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 519 567 292 357 227 210

LAKE 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 236 120 121 87 115 LASSEN 1 1 1 1 0 0 219 224 169 176 50 48 LOS ANGELES 733 584 691 539 42 45 26,896 26,158 15,819 13,339 11,077 12,819 MADERA 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,690 1,402 700 606 990 796 MARIN 9 8 8 8 1 0 538 708 382 405 156 303 MARIPOSA 3 1 3 1 0 0 92 88 82 71 10 17 MENDOCINO 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 439 i 697 220 i 312 219 i 385 MERCED 1 3 1 3 0 0 1,163 1,058 836 684 327 374 MODOC 11 0 9 0 2 0 61 55 58 51 3 4

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 137: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 11 JUVENILE DELINQUENCY FILINGS BY TYPE

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

§ 601 W & I § 602 W & I

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,042 816 974 752 68 64 104,497 104,858 r 67,058 64,394 r 37,439 40,464 r

MONO 2 4 2 4 0 0 38 42 36 42 2 0 MONTEREY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,297 1,489 722 860 575 629 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 0 0 0 0 0 0 364 346 204 206 160 140 NEVADA 1 0 1 0 0 0 281 281 186 206 95 75 ORANGE 1 0 1 0 0 0 6,425 6,895 4,333 4,528 2,092 2,367 PLACER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,098 1,164 514 708 584 456 PLUMAS 3 1 3 1 0 0 68 84 68 82 0 2 RIVERSIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,699 5,170 3,052 2,991 1,647 2,179

SACRAMENTO 7 10 7 10 0 0 5,276 4,490 3,192 2,284 2,084 2,206 SAN BENITO 30 21 25 15 5 6 156 233 91 125 65 108 SAN BERNARDINO 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,164 4,245 3,347 3,436 817 809 SAN DIEGO 72 73 72 73 0 0 5,024 4,751 5,024 4,751 0 0 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 SAN FRANCISCO 0 5 0 4 0 1 1,875 1,910 1,101 1,183 774 727 SAN JOAQUIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,936 1,653 1,117 1,021 819 632 SAN LUIS OBISPO 12 33 11 26 1 7 698 724 521 534 177 190

SAN MATEO 4 5 3 5 1 0 4,699 4,779 1,650 1,489 3,049 3,290 SANTA BARBARA 0 2 0 1 0 1 2,692 2,483 r 1,929 1,561 763 922 rSANTA CLARA 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,880 3,932 2,634 2,518 1,246 1,414 SANTA CRUZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 727 594 505 434 222 160 SHASTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,814 1,802 r 1,348 1,252 r 466 550 SIERRA 2 8 2 8 0 0 14 32 13 32 1 0 SISKIYOU 32 0 32 0 0 0 75 113 75 87 0 26 SOLANO 2 3 2 3 0 0 1,712 1,507 1,071 1,050 641 457 SONOMA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,484 1,616 1,013 1,185 471 431

STANISLAUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,955 2,041 1,349 1,391 606 650 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 175 198 134 0 41 TEHAMA 7 4 2 4 5 0 294 375 121 176 173 199 TRINITY 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 10 i 34 10 i 34 0 i 0 TULARE 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,194 2,645 1,380 1,711 814 934 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 1 0 1 0 0 0 175 143 r 113 100 r 62 43 rVENTURA 0 6 0 5 0 1 1,801 1,942 1,075 1,339 726 603

YOLO 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 396 209 276 60 120 YUBA 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 297 167 183 154 114

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 138: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTSTABLE 12 JUVENILE DEPENDENCY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARINGFILINGS TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 46,800 42,601 r 38,655 34,767 r 8,145 7,834 r 34,998 39,419 r 10,480 15,272 r 18,271 17,825 r 6,247 6,322 r

ALAMEDA 1,100 1,184 r 1,100 1,184 r 0 0 r 1,284 1,104 r 9 17 936 898 r 339 189 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 16 11 16 11 0 0 17 17 9 3 4 2 4 12 AMADOR 28 31 28 26 0 5 30 31 0 2 25 21 5 8 BUTTE 558 610 468 514 90 96 525 533 13 24 471 414 41 95 CALAVERAS 36 50 33 49 3 1 7 61 2 3 1 48 4 10 COLUSA 14 18 r 12 18 r 2 0 19 10 r 0 0 19 9 r 0 1 r

CONTRA COSTA 1,126 919 898 704 228 215 324 202 6 15 286 160 32 27 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 53 55 49 53 4 2 38 52 r 1 10 35 38 2 4 r34 EL DORADO 156 138 140 128 16 10 86 86 26 28 41 48 19 10 FRESNO 1,138 551 r 808 527 r 330 24 r 771 1,149 r 61 67 r 331 711 r 379 371 rGLENN 40 i 49 39 i 47 1 i 2 20 i 49 0 i 1 19 i 37 1 i 11

HUMBOLDT 84 89 67 71 17 18 2 5 2 3 0 2 0 0 IMPERIAL 126 i 116 83 i 80 43 i 36 71 i 136 27 i 64 34 i 51 10 i 21 INYO 27 14 25 13 2 1 8 8 0 4 8 4 0 0 KERN 1,169 836 968 626 201 210 1,303 741 272 254 916 395 115 92 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 65 74 65 70 0 4 20 50 16 22 3 23 1 5

LAKE 65 54 65 47 0 7 55 39 9 6 39 22 7 11 LASSEN 80 94 54 76 26 18 83 76 7 18 45 46 31 12 LOS ANGELES 19,429 18,497 14,401 13,692 5,028 4,805 11,348 16,535 8,902 13,461 377 867 2,069 2,207 MADERA 471 302 383 240 88 62 62 57 28 34 30 22 4 1 MARIN 90 88 82 83 8 5 126 155 18 52 102 59 6 44 MARIPOSA 14 44 14 44 0 0 3 12 1 0 2 12 0 0 MENDOCINO 73 i 111 63 i 98 10 i 13 34 i 98 21 i 36 0 i 38 13 i 24 MERCED 137 183 137 183 0 0 85 302 26 4 54 271 5 27 MODOC 9 14 9 14 0 0 9 22 0 0 5 19 4 3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 139: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTSTABLE 12 JUVENILE DEPENDENCY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARINGFILINGS TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

TOTAL ORIGINAL SUBSEQUENT DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 46,800 42,601 r 38,655 34,767 r 8,145 7,834 r 34,998 39,419 r 10,480 15,272 r 18,271 17,825 r 6,247 6,322 r

MONO 12 14 9 9 3 5 7 11 3 6 4 5 0 0 MONTEREY 188 130 188 129 0 1 6 5 2 2 4 1 0 2 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 74 73 57 67 17 6 50 71 13 3 34 57 3 11 NEVADA 70 31 69 31 1 0 33 55 5 41 23 12 5 2 ORANGE 2,418 1,821 2,358 1,761 60 60 2,091 1,691 1 17 1,850 1,314 240 360 PLACER 355 208 295 188 60 20 311 175 35 32 267 143 9 0 PLUMAS 14 24 14 24 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 14 2 2 RIVERSIDE 2,997 2,738 2,914 2,445 83 293 2,139 2,737 105 244 1,224 1,618 810 875

SACRAMENTO 1,503 964 1,454 953 49 11 1,300 1,077 88 1 1,153 1,032 59 44 SAN BENITO 22 19 19 18 3 1 13 56 2 0 10 50 1 6 SAN BERNARDINO 3,505 3,276 3,258 3,067 247 209 4,153 3,383 0 0 4,153 3,383 0 0 SAN DIEGO 2,471 2,019 2,442 1,974 29 45 2,805 2,493 137 109 2,060 2,080 608 304 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 35 SAN FRANCISCO 977 1,319 580 808 397 511 948 1,112 61 114 819 924 68 74 SAN JOAQUIN 634 613 554 531 80 82 694 675 95 135 510 366 89 174 SAN LUIS OBISPO 123 185 115 172 8 13 208 166 11 6 176 128 21 32

SAN MATEO 528 545 284 229 244 316 239 167 0 0 237 154 2 13 SANTA BARBARA 158 151 155 149 3 2 160 165 27 34 122 114 11 17 SANTA CLARA 1,495 1,572 1,124 1,198 371 374 1,228 1,398 67 112 199 327 962 959 SANTA CRUZ 259 228 259 228 0 0 110 116 15 12 93 94 2 10 SHASTA 250 191 196 154 54 37 135 117 r 9 24 62 62 r 64 31 SIERRA 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 3 SISKIYOU 50 57 50 55 0 2 55 56 8 1 22 30 25 25 SOLANO 160 186 126 172 34 14 81 183 21 21 42 141 18 21 SONOMA 201 160 152 136 49 24 215 201 42 16 144 141 29 44

STANISLAUS 259 319 235 313 24 6 296 289 23 51 269 227 4 11 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 49 61 49 59 0 2 76 87 36 24 40 63 0 0 TEHAMA 169 118 147 94 22 24 101 93 31 18 64 66 6 9 TRINITY 0 i 11 0 i 11 0 i 0 1 i 19 0 i 12 1 i 3 0 i 4 TULARE 960 757 833 615 127 142 490 584 134 108 338 458 18 18 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 36 16 r 31 16 r 5 0 34 20 r 0 0 17 7 r 17 13 rVENTURA 385 399 372 365 13 34 300 432 17 0 266 410 17 22

YOLO 190 141 166 129 24 12 195 167 27 0 131 129 37 38 YUBA 184 115 143 61 41 54 152 63 9 1 134 53 9 9

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 140: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 13 CRIMINAL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS TOTAL GUILTY PLEAS OTHER MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 161,580 153,883 r 148,745 154,593 r 141,487 146,925 r 132,271 136,953 r 9,216 9,972 r 1,405 1,481 r 5,853 6,187 r

ALAMEDA 5,609 5,427 r 3,932 4,328 r 3,763 4,175 r 3,322 3,802 r 441 373 r 50 28 r 119 125 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 24 36 r 24 36 r 24 36 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 32 21 r 32 21 r 32 21 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL 0 0 206 150 r 206 150 r 206 150 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAKLAND MUNICIPAL 0 0 1,464 802 r 1,464 802 r 1,464 802 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN LEANDRO MUNICIPAL 0 0 77 76 r 77 76 r 77 76 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 8 8 2 14 2 13 2 11 0 2 0 0 0 1 AMADOR 101 60 47 53 46 48 37 44 9 4 0 2 1 3 BUTTE 1,130 1,405 984 1,159 936 1,074 784 712 152 362 7 15 41 70

CALAVERAS 52 118 95 157 77 117 68 102 9 15 11 3 7 37 COLUSA 120 121 r 120 111 r 114 105 r 92 89 r 22 16 r 0 0 6 6 rCONTRA COSTA 4,250 4,341 4,375 4,005 4,118 3,775 3,880 3,594 238 181 4 7 253 223 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 13 8 13 2 13 2 0 0 0 1 0 5

1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 21 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 4 0 19 2 19 1 19 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEL NORTE 290 275 242 211 229 201 217 191 12 10 1 0 12 10 EL DORADO 246 249 218 229 r 189 189 r 156 156 33 33 r 0 0 29 40 FRESNO 5,251 5,336 5,652 5,378 5,451 5,219 5,007 4,780 444 439 5 1 196 158

GLENN 86 i 142 62 i 159 62 i 157 60 i 146 2 i 11 0 i 0 0 i 2 HUMBOLDT 301 198 267 544 146 388 125 334 21 54 111 132 10 24 IMPERIAL 559 i 667 454 i 695 430 i 615 405 i 579 25 i 36 9 i 57 15 i 23 INYO 141 122 105 122 102 120 97 115 5 5 1 0 2 2 KERN 4,278 4,882 4,111 4,749 3,790 4,454 3,008 3,584 782 870 7 8 314 287 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 55 0 61 7 33 2 33 2 0 0 5 0 23 5 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 2 1 6 1 6 1 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 24 0 29 0 28 0 28 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 9 1 16 1 16 1 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 661 576 560 499 518 441 451 391 67 50 0 0 42 58

LAKE 103 166 127 167 92 131 53 79 39 52 0 2 35 34 LASSEN 92 75 40 89 24 57 14 29 10 28 4 0 12 32 LOS ANGELES 51,334 47,467 44,820 48,048 42,647 45,668 39,987 42,883 2,660 2,785 410 521 1,763 1,859 MADERA 668 602 557 645 537 614 469 569 68 45 0 2 20 29 MARIN 571 539 r 726 486 551 433 492 414 59 19 101 10 74 43 MARIPOSA 84 124 107 125 104 120 91 104 13 16 1 0 2 5 MENDOCINO 304 i 458 238 i 488 222 i 404 200 i 347 22 i 57 2 i 12 14 i 72 MERCED 989 938 607 844 596 834 583 834 13 0 2 10 9 0 MODOC 50 54 22 40 21 38 17 30 4 8 0 0 1 2 MONO 67 78 65 77 63 76 63 74 0 2 0 0 2 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 141: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 13 CRIMINAL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIAL

TOTAL TOTAL UNCONTESTED CONTESTEDFILINGS DISPOSITIONS TOTAL GUILTY PLEAS OTHER MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 161,580 153,883 r 148,745 154,593 r 141,487 146,925 r 132,271 136,953 r 9,216 9,972 r 1,405 1,481 r 5,853 6,187 r

MONTEREY 1,912 1,846 1,610 1,726 1,519 1,656 1,367 1,469 152 187 15 6 76 64 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 590 651 454 680 434 648 410 618 24 30 0 9 20 23 NEVADA 224 293 228 266 213 259 192 240 21 19 3 2 12 5 ORANGE 11,351 9,640 10,210 9,517 9,783 9,085 9,535 8,855 248 230 21 1 406 431 PLACER 512 586 501 478 489 462 434 407 55 55 1 0 11 16 PLUMAS 79 83 71 64 63 60 60 54 3 6 0 2 8 2 RIVERSIDE 7,989 5,780 4,687 4,776 4,389 4,482 4,311 4,312 78 170 35 35 263 259 SACRAMENTO 6,423 5,754 6,504 6,672 6,178 6,272 5,806 5,692 372 580 150 196 176 204 SAN BENITO 286 271 258 215 248 204 214 174 34 30 0 0 10 11

SAN BERNARDINO 9,402 9,697 9,364 9,409 9,179 9,302 8,626 8,702 553 600 67 25 118 82 SAN DIEGO 15,184 15,340 14,769 15,504 14,258 14,880 13,779 14,396 479 484 70 92 441 532 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 1,040 989 1,078 1,020 1,036 989 1,036 989 0 0 1 1 41 30 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14

1 SAN FRANCISCO 3,551 3,833 3,782 4,177 3,698 4,066 3,509 3,905 189 161 8 23 76 88 37 SAN JOAQUIN 1,630 1,605 1,495 1,519 1,371 1,373 1,196 1,154 175 219 23 27 101 119 SAN LUIS OBISPO 741 747 704 909 680 879 656 816 24 63 8 13 16 17 SAN MATEO 2,213 2,163 2,140 2,112 2,076 2,016 1,955 1,891 121 125 19 29 45 67 SANTA BARBARA 1,539 1,607 1,364 1,586 r 1,331 1,549 1,280 1,490 51 59 4 6 29 31 rSANTA CLARA 8,864 8,534 8,294 8,155 7,923 7,786 r 7,721 7,579 r 202 207 55 52 r 316 317

SANTA CRUZ 505 460 521 415 484 387 362 310 122 77 8 2 29 26 SHASTA 718 753 r 553 594 r 490 498 r 476 414 r 14 84 r 56 86 r 7 10 rSIERRA 18 11 17 16 17 16 16 14 1 2 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 331 203 165 188 146 178 145 174 1 4 5 0 14 10 SOLANO 1,903 1,848 1,822 1,960 1,691 1,872 1,617 1,760 74 112 8 1 123 87 SONOMA 1,310 1,265 1,182 1,249 1,105 1,147 921 973 184 174 12 17 65 85 STANISLAUS 842 1,000 1,627 2,024 1,469 1,850 1,054 1,469 415 381 37 4 121 170 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 82 22 78 11 54 11 24 0 0 4 4 7 SUTTER 712 668 749 658 730 651 691 621 39 30 8 0 11 7 TEHAMA 310 295 284 265 260 244 225 184 35 60 2 0 22 21

TRINITY 19 i 81 15 i 68 13 i 65 11 i 59 2 i 6 0 i 0 2 i 3 TULARE 489 576 509 485 392 386 352 353 40 33 4 1 113 98 TULARE MUNICIPAL 217 262 r 218 211 r 195 191 r 126 129 r 69 62 r 4 0 19 20 rTUOLUMNE 305 345 r 297 345 r 287 323 r 257 295 r 30 28 r 0 0 10 22 rVENTURA 2,191 1,804 1,853 1,777 1,736 1,635 1,631 1,519 105 116 12 21 105 121 YOLO 331 182 429 665 377 633 311 592 66 41 36 14 16 18 YUBA 410 281 392 326 380 312 317 248 63 64 1 0 11 14

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 142: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 14 CRIMINAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER UNCONTESTED TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL DISPOSED AFTER UNCONTESTED TRIAL ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED

ALL DEFENDANTS BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,405 1,481 r 695 679 r 710 802 r 213 203 r 162 189 r 482 476 r 548 613 r

ALAMEDA 50 28 r 0 0 r 50 28 r 0 0 r 17 11 r 0 0 r 33 17 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAKLAND MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN LEANDRO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 BUTTE 7 15 5 7 2 8 1 1 0 0 4 6 2 8

CALAVERAS 11 3 10 2 1 1 4 0 1 0 6 2 0 1 COLUSA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONTRA COSTA 4 7 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEL NORTE 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 EL DORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FRESNO 5 1 1 1 4 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0

GLENN 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 HUMBOLDT 111 132 96 126 15 6 1 0 3 0 95 126 12 6 IMPERIAL 9 i 57 9 i 55 0 i 2 0 i 1 0 i 0 9 i 54 0 i 2 INYO 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 KERN 7 8 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 5 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAKE 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 LASSEN 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 LOS ANGELES 410 521 146 169 264 352 110 136 85 131 36 33 179 221 MADERA 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 MARIN 101 10 86 4 15 6 19 0 4 0 67 4 11 6 MARIPOSA 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 MENDOCINO 2 i 12 2 i 10 0 i 2 0 i 0 0 i 2 2 i 10 0 i 0 MERCED 2 10 0 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 7 MODOC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MONO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 143: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 14 CRIMINAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER UNCONTESTED TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL DISPOSED AFTER UNCONTESTED TRIAL ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED

ALL DEFENDANTS BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 1,405 1,481 r 695 679 r 710 802 r 213 203 r 162 189 r 482 476 r 548 613 r

MONTEREY 15 6 9 4 6 2 1 0 0 0 8 4 6 2 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 NEVADA 3 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 ORANGE 21 1 17 0 4 1 12 0 0 0 5 0 4 1 PLACER 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 PLUMAS 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 RIVERSIDE 35 35 33 33 2 2 19 22 0 1 14 11 2 1 SACRAMENTO 150 196 95 109 55 87 26 19 6 15 69 90 49 72 SAN BENITO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO 67 25 58 17 9 8 0 0 0 0 58 17 9 8 SAN DIEGO 70 92 7 11 63 81 1 0 8 4 6 11 55 77 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 SAN FRANCISCO 8 23 3 7 5 16 0 1 0 0 3 6 5 16 39 SAN JOAQUIN 23 27 13 7 10 20 2 0 0 1 11 7 10 19 SAN LUIS OBISPO 8 13 6 7 2 6 3 1 1 2 3 6 1 4 SAN MATEO 19 29 3 10 16 19 0 1 1 2 3 9 15 17 SANTA BARBARA 4 6 2 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 4 SANTA CLARA 55 52 r 13 28 r 42 24 1 8 3 2 12 20 r 39 22

SANTA CRUZ 8 2 2 0 6 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 2 SHASTA 56 86 r 3 21 r 53 65 r 0 0 19 15 3 21 r 34 50 rSIERRA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 5 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 SOLANO 8 1 8 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 SONOMA 12 17 1 2 11 15 1 1 0 1 0 1 11 14 STANISLAUS 37 4 13 3 24 1 4 1 2 0 9 2 22 1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 SUTTER 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 TEHAMA 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TRINITY 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 TULARE 4 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 TULARE MUNICIPAL 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VENTURA 12 21 5 8 7 13 2 1 0 0 3 7 7 13 YOLO 36 14 30 5 6 9 0 0 0 1 30 5 6 8 YUBA 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 144: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 15 CRIMINAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER CONTESTED TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL DISPOSED AFTER CONTESTED TRIAL ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED

ALL DEFENDANTS BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 5,853 6,187 r 659 660 r 5,194 5,527 r 83 78 r 664 769 r 576 582 r 4,530 4,758 r

ALAMEDA 119 125 r 7 17 r 112 108 r 0 1 r 1 2 r 7 16 r 111 106 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAKLAND MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN LEANDRO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 AMADOR 1 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 BUTTE 41 70 15 9 26 61 2 0 0 12 13 9 26 49

CALAVERAS 7 37 1 32 6 5 0 1 1 0 1 31 5 5 COLUSA 6 6 r 0 2 r 6 4 r 0 2 r 4 2 r 0 0 2 2 rCONTRA COSTA 253 223 27 21 226 202 1 5 32 31 26 16 194 171 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3

1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEL NORTE 12 10 1 0 11 10 0 0 2 3 1 0 9 7 EL DORADO 29 40 1 0 28 40 1 0 8 8 0 0 20 32 FRESNO 196 158 13 11 183 147 4 4 24 15 9 7 159 132

GLENN 0 i 2 0 i 0 0 i 2 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 2 HUMBOLDT 10 24 0 2 10 22 0 0 1 1 0 2 9 21 IMPERIAL 15 i 23 9 i 1 6 i 22 0 i 0 0 i 5 9 i 1 6 i 17 INYO 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 KERN 314 287 6 5 308 282 0 2 23 32 6 3 285 250 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 23 5 1 0 22 5 0 0 6 0 1 0 16 5 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 42 58 1 0 41 58 1 0 7 7 0 0 34 51

LAKE 35 34 5 3 30 31 0 1 0 4 5 2 30 27 LASSEN 12 32 3 3 9 29 2 3 4 10 1 0 5 19 LOS ANGELES 1,763 1,859 186 136 1,577 1,723 30 25 251 339 156 111 1,326 1,384 MADERA 20 29 0 0 20 29 0 0 1 8 0 0 19 21 MARIN 74 43 29 1 45 42 3 0 6 8 26 1 39 34 MARIPOSA 2 5 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 MENDOCINO 14 i 72 4 i 49 10 i 23 0 i 1 4 i 5 4 i 48 6 i 18 MERCED 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 MODOC 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 MONO 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 145: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 15 CRIMINAL DISPOSITIONS AFTER CONTESTED TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL DISPOSED AFTER CONTESTED TRIAL ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED

ALL DEFENDANTS BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY BY COURT BY JURY

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 5,853 6,187 r 659 660 r 5,194 5,527 r 83 78 r 664 769 r 576 582 r 4,530 4,758 r

MONTEREY 76 64 42 42 34 22 5 2 10 6 37 40 24 16 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 20 23 3 8 17 15 1 0 3 3 2 8 14 12 NEVADA 12 5 3 0 9 5 0 0 1 1 3 0 8 4 ORANGE 406 431 48 41 358 390 5 1 36 26 43 40 322 364 PLACER 11 16 7 7 4 9 2 0 1 1 5 7 3 8 PLUMAS 8 2 8 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 RIVERSIDE 263 259 3 22 260 237 0 2 20 17 3 20 240 220 SACRAMENTO 176 204 34 43 142 161 2 3 11 25 32 40 131 136 SAN BENITO 10 11 4 6 6 5 0 0 0 0 4 6 6 5

SAN BERNARDINO 118 82 16 5 102 77 6 0 16 20 10 5 86 57 SAN DIEGO 441 532 21 29 420 503 1 1 51 32 20 28 369 471 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 41 30 0 2 41 28 0 2 0 0 0 0 41 28 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 14 14 0 0 14 14 0 0 4 1 0 0 10 13

1 SAN FRANCISCO 76 88 0 1 76 87 0 0 8 10 0 1 68 77 41 SAN JOAQUIN 101 119 20 10 81 109 1 0 6 7 19 10 75 102 SAN LUIS OBISPO 16 17 2 1 14 16 0 1 2 1 2 0 12 15 SAN MATEO 45 67 1 2 44 65 1 1 6 9 0 1 38 56 SANTA BARBARA 29 31 r 7 6 22 25 r 1 1 3 1 6 5 19 24 rSANTA CLARA 316 317 41 61 275 256 0 1 18 25 41 60 257 231

SANTA CRUZ 29 26 6 0 23 26 0 0 5 6 6 0 18 20 SHASTA 7 10 r 7 3 r 0 7 0 0 0 2 7 3 r 0 5 SIERRA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 14 10 2 2 12 8 0 0 4 0 2 2 8 8 SOLANO 123 87 5 1 118 86 0 0 18 15 5 1 100 71 SONOMA 65 85 15 18 50 67 2 7 8 16 13 11 42 51 STANISLAUS 121 170 7 14 114 156 1 1 13 14 6 13 101 142 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 4 7 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 SUTTER 11 7 0 0 11 7 0 0 2 2 0 0 9 5 TEHAMA 22 21 0 2 22 19 0 2 6 8 0 0 16 11

TRINITY 2 i 3 0 i 1 2 i 2 0 i 1 0 i 0 0 i 0 2 i 2 TULARE 113 98 13 7 100 91 2 0 16 11 11 7 84 80 TULARE MUNICIPAL 19 20 r 0 1 19 19 r 0 0 8 2 0 1 11 17 rTUOLUMNE 10 22 r 0 0 10 22 r 0 0 2 2 0 0 8 20 rVENTURA 105 121 26 28 79 93 7 6 8 5 19 22 71 88 YOLO 16 18 2 0 14 18 0 0 0 2 2 0 14 16 YUBA 11 14 4 2 7 12 2 0 2 2 2 2 5 10

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 146: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTSTABLE 16 LEVEL OF CONVICTION OF CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

CONVICTED BEFORE TRIAL CONVICTED AFTER CONVICTED AFTERTOTAL DEFENDANTS CONVICTED OF ON PLEA OF GUILTY COURT TRIAL OF JURY TRIAL OF

ALL TYPES FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR

COUNTY 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96

STATE TOTAL 138,407 143,382 r 134,958 139,978 r 3,449 3,404 r 129,428 134,129 r 2,843 2,824 r 964 972 r 94 86 r 4,566 4,877 r 512 494 r

ALAMEDA 3,473 3,941 r 3,420 3,890 r 53 51 r 3,272 3,758 r 50 44 r 7 16 r 0 0 141 116 r 3 7 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 24 36 r 24 36 r 0 0 24 36 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 32 21 r 32 21 r 0 0 32 21 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL 206 150 r 206 150 r 0 0 206 150 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OAKLAND MUNICIPAL 1,464 802 r 1,464 802 r 0 0 1,464 802 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN LEANDRO MUNICIPAL 77 76 r 77 76 r 0 0 77 76 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 2 12 0 10 2 2 0 9 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 AMADOR 38 46 37 46 1 0 36 44 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 BUTTE 829 784 780 779 49 5 737 708 47 4 16 15 1 0 27 56 1 1

CALAVERAS 80 141 72 112 8 29 61 76 7 26 6 30 1 3 5 6 0 0 COLUSA 94 91 r 82 91 r 12 0 80 89 r 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 r 0 0 CONTRA COSTA 4,104 3,788 3,912 3,603 192 185 3,712 3,432 168 162 26 18 4 5 174 153 20 18 BAY MUNICIPAL 13 6 13 5 0 1 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0

1 DELTA MUNICIPAL 21 0 21 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 19 2 19 2 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEL NORTE 227 198 227 198 0 0 217 191 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 7 0 0 EL DORADO 176 188 176 188 0 0 156 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 32 0 0 FRESNO 5,176 4,919 5,176 4,919 0 0 5,007 4,780 0 0 10 7 0 0 159 132 0 0

GLENN 60 i 148 60 i 139 0 i 9 60 i 137 0 i 9 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 2 0 i 0 HUMBOLDT 241 489 241 489 0 0 125 334 0 0 95 128 0 0 21 27 0 0 IMPERIAL 429 i 653 423 i 639 6 i 14 399 i 566 6 i 13 18 i 54 0 i 1 6 i 19 0 i 0 INYO 100 117 100 117 0 0 97 115 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 KERN 3,306 3,845 3,287 3,814 19 31 2,990 3,554 18 30 6 3 0 0 291 257 1 1 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 55 7 55 7 0 0 33 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 19 5 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 5 1 4 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 29 0 29 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 16 1 16 1 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 485 442 465 413 20 29 431 365 20 26 0 0 0 0 34 48 0 3

LAKE 88 110 88 110 0 0 53 79 0 0 5 2 0 0 30 29 0 0 LASSEN 20 48 20 46 0 2 14 27 0 2 1 0 0 0 5 19 0 0 LOS ANGELES 41,684 44,632 40,932 43,858 752 774 39,680 42,536 307 347 147 111 45 33 1,105 1,211 400 394 MADERA 488 592 475 576 13 16 458 555 11 14 0 1 0 1 17 20 2 1 MARIN 635 459 530 454 105 5 416 411 76 3 77 3 16 2 37 40 13 0 MARIPOSA 94 108 73 91 21 17 71 87 20 17 0 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 MENDOCINO 212 i 423 212 i 423 0 i 0 200 i 347 0 i 0 6 i 58 0 i 0 6 i 18 0 i 0 MERCED 593 844 586 844 7 0 576 834 7 0 0 3 0 0 10 7 0 0 MODOC 18 32 12 17 6 15 11 15 6 15 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 MONO 65 75 62 69 3 6 60 68 3 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 147: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTSTABLE 16 LEVEL OF CONVICTION OF CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

CONVICTED BEFORE TRIAL CONVICTED AFTER CONVICTED AFTERTOTAL DEFENDANTS CONVICTED OF ON PLEA OF GUILTY COURT TRIAL OF JURY TRIAL OF

ALL TYPES FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR FELONY MISDEMEANOR

COUNTY 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96 96–97 95–96

STATE TOTAL 138,407 143,382 r 134,958 139,978 r 3,449 3,404 r 129,428 134,129 r 2,843 2,824 r 964 972 r 94 86 r 4,566 4,877 r 512 494 r

MONTEREY 1,442 1,531 1,324 1,351 118 180 1,255 1,294 112 175 39 39 6 5 30 18 0 0 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 426 639 395 621 31 18 381 600 29 18 2 9 0 0 12 12 2 0 NEVADA 206 246 197 241 9 5 184 236 8 4 3 2 0 0 10 3 1 1 ORANGE 9,909 9,260 9,765 9,116 144 144 9,404 8,722 131 133 47 39 1 1 314 355 12 10 PLACER 443 422 418 419 25 3 410 405 24 2 5 6 0 1 3 8 1 0 PLUMAS 68 57 67 54 1 3 59 51 1 3 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE 4,570 4,564 4,462 4,403 108 161 4,209 4,156 102 156 16 27 1 4 237 220 5 1 SACRAMENTO 6,087 6,030 6,085 6,030 2 0 5,804 5,692 2 0 101 130 0 0 180 208 0 0 SAN BENITO 224 185 224 185 0 0 214 174 0 0 4 6 0 0 6 5 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO 8,789 8,789 8,614 8,602 175 187 8,454 8,520 172 182 67 18 1 4 93 64 2 1 SAN DIEGO 14,229 14,983 13,856 14,647 373 336 13,410 14,071 369 325 25 37 1 2 421 539 3 9 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 1,078 1,018 1,078 1,018 0 0 1,036 989 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 29 0 0 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 10 13 10 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 0 0

1 SAN FRANCISCO 3,585 4,005 3,268 3,697 317 308 3,192 3,597 317 308 3 7 0 0 73 93 0 0 43 SAN JOAQUIN 1,311 1,292 1,268 1,259 43 33 1,154 1,122 42 32 30 17 0 0 84 120 1 1 SAN LUIS OBISPO 674 841 649 823 25 18 631 799 25 17 5 5 0 1 13 19 0 0 SAN MATEO 2,011 1,974 1,963 1,913 48 61 1,907 1,833 48 58 3 9 0 1 53 71 0 2 SANTA BARBARA 1,309 1,525 r 1,287 1,499 r 22 26 1,259 1,469 21 21 8 6 0 1 20 24 r 1 4 SANTA CLARA 8,070 7,912 7,950 7,807 120 105 7,611 7,490 r 110 89 50 71 r 3 9 289 246 7 7

SANTA CRUZ 392 332 329 281 63 51 299 261 63 49 8 0 0 0 22 20 0 2 SHASTA 520 493 r 448 376 r 72 117 r 409 306 r 67 108 r 8 21 r 2 3 r 31 49 r 3 6 SIERRA 16 14 15 13 1 1 15 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 159 184 145 133 14 51 131 126 14 48 4 0 0 2 10 7 0 1 SOLANO 1,726 1,832 1,625 1,798 101 34 1,526 1,730 91 30 7 1 2 0 92 67 8 4 SONOMA 987 1,050 845 940 142 110 788 867 133 106 10 10 3 2 47 63 6 2 STANISLAUS 1,192 1,627 1,120 1,538 72 89 993 1,388 61 81 13 11 2 4 114 139 9 4 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 58 22 58 22 0 0 54 11 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 7 0 0 SUTTER 708 626 647 573 61 53 634 568 57 53 0 0 0 0 13 5 4 0 TEHAMA 241 195 241 195 0 0 225 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 11 0 0

TRINITY 13 i 61 11 i 60 2 i 1 9 i 58 2 i 1 0 i 0 0 i 0 2 i 2 0 i 0 TULARE 451 441 418 414 33 27 322 331 30 22 13 8 2 0 83 75 1 5 TULARE MUNICIPAL 141 147 r 139 132 r 2 15 r 124 114 r 2 15 r 4 1 0 0 11 17 r 0 0 TUOLUMNE 265 315 r 265 313 r 0 2 r 257 294 r 0 1 r 0 0 0 0 8 19 r 0 1 VENTURA 1,731 1,649 1,718 1,627 13 22 1,620 1,501 11 18 20 28 2 1 78 98 0 3 YOLO 363 621 338 582 25 39 291 556 20 36 32 5 0 0 15 21 5 3 YUBA 325 260 308 247 17 13 301 237 16 11 2 2 0 0 5 8 1 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 148: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 17 CRIMINAL DATA (ALL TRIAL COURTS)

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97

COURTS OFMUNICIPAL COURTS SUPERIOR COURTS APPEAL

BOUND SENTENCINGOVER AND ON FELONY CRIMINAL

FELONY FELONY GUILTY GUILTY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL JURY DEFENDANTS CONVICTED NOTICES OFCOUNTY FILINGS DISPOSITIONS PLEAS PLEAS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS TRIALS FELONY MISDEMEANOR APPEAL

STATE TOTAL 251,575 233,645 172,495 27,948 161,580 148,745 5,904 134,958 3,449 8,818

ALAMEDA 9,174 8,706 5,683 0 5,609 5,735 162 5,223 53 149ALPINE 22 23 15 0 8 2 0 0 2 0AMADOR 540 433 270 150 101 47 0 37 1 15BUTTE 1,350 765 478 0 1,130 984 28 780 49 90CALAVERAS 183 157 89 12 52 95 7 72 8 13

COLUSA 305 176 121 0 120 120 6 82 12 10CONTRA COSTA 5,829 5,307 4,090 29 4,254 4,428 226 3,965 192 217DEL NORTE 552 650 480 0 290 242 12 227 0 17EL DORADO 988 916 636 303 246 218 28 176 0 37FRESNO 10,854 9,626 5,961 0 5,251 5,652 187 5,176 0 197

GLENN 335 220 148 9 86 i 62 i 0 i 60 i 0 i 3

1 HUMBOLDT 1,281 709 494 64 301 267 25 241 0 4444 IMPERIAL 1,597 1,430 745 304 559 i 454 i 6 i 423 i 6 i 11INYO 240 202 148 0 141 105 3 100 0 2KERN 6,056 5,968 4,278 14 4,368 4,223 340 3,391 20 473

KINGS 1,134 1,071 657 4 661 560 41 465 20 50LAKE 374 286 185 95 103 127 30 88 0 41LASSEN 395 331 209 153 92 40 13 20 0 20LOS ANGELES 63,910 63,122 49,182 4,521 51,334 44,820 1,841 40,932 752 2,513MADERA 1,735 1,839 810 1 668 557 20 475 13 36

MARIN 1,251 1,280 676 0 571 726 60 530 105 77MARIPOSA 141 82 68 0 84 107 2 73 21 5MENDOCINO 1,241 908 422 0 304 i 238 i 10 i 212 i 0 i 32MERCED 2,730 2,181 1,047 89 989 607 11 586 7 49MODOC 189 122 60 26 50 22 1 12 6 4

MONO 153 176 107 0 67 65 1 62 3 5MONTEREY 2,312 2,232 1,737 0 1,912 1,610 40 1,324 118 115NAPA 863 884 385 0 590 454 17 395 31 23NEVADA 523 651 568 1 224 228 12 197 9 13ORANGE 15,247 15,422 12,770 8,191 11,351 10,210 362 9,765 144 426

i Incomplete data

Page 149: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 17 CRIMINAL DATA (ALL TRIAL COURTS)

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97

COURTS OFMUNICIPAL COURTS SUPERIOR COURTS APPEAL

BOUND SENTENCINGOVER AND ON FELONY CRIMINAL

FELONY FELONY GUILTY GUILTY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL JURY DEFENDANTS CONVICTED NOTICES OFCOUNTY FILINGS DISPOSITIONS PLEAS PLEAS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS TRIALS FELONY MISDEMEANOR APPEAL

STATE TOTAL 251,575 233,645 172,495 27,948 161,580 148,745 5,904 134,958 3,449 8,818

PLACER 1,604 1,594 1,169 409 512 501 5 418 25 44PLUMAS 171 i 78 i 36 i 0 i 79 71 0 67 1 1RIVERSIDE 12,909 10,058 7,826 2,899 7,989 4,687 262 4,462 108 386SACRAMENTO 10,784 10,199 7,267 0 6,423 6,504 197 6,085 2 447SAN BENITO 432 290 281 0 286 258 6 224 0 10

SAN BERNARDINO 14,814 14,527 11,134 837 9,402 9,364 111 8,614 175 426SAN DIEGO 17,892 17,233 15,008 0 16,224 15,861 539 14,944 373 843SAN FRANCISCO 8,115 7,121 4,107 577 3,551 3,782 81 3,268 317 110SAN JOAQUIN 4,914 4,650 3,542 2,115 1,630 1,495 91 1,268 43 141SAN LUIS OBISPO 1,213 1,051 763 154 741 704 16 649 25 61

SAN MATEO 2,847 2,601 2,161 17 2,213 2,140 60 1,963 48 108

1 SANTA BARBARA 2,163 1,799 1,459 658 1,539 1,364 24 1,287 22 8945 SANTA CLARA 12,010 9,668 7,967 0 8,864 8,294 317 7,950 120 393SANTA CRUZ 2,445 1,860 1,354 702 505 521 29 329 63 69SHASTA 2,171 2,130 1,452 533 718 553 53 448 72 97

SIERRA 42 30 23 0 18 17 0 15 1 1SISKIYOU 629 401 134 152 331 165 14 145 14 18SOLANO 3,750 3,601 2,157 974 1,903 1,822 118 1,625 101 144SONOMA 3,160 2,955 1,920 663 1,310 1,182 61 845 142 95STANISLAUS 5,181 4,869 2,957 1,099 842 1,709 142 1,178 72 128

SUTTER 1,339 1,363 712 0 712 749 19 647 61 27TEHAMA 657 609 263 0 310 284 23 241 0 33TRINITY 238 264 147 25 19 i 15 i 2 i 11 i 2 i 8TULARE 3,891 3,274 2,477 1,708 706 727 119 557 35 193TUOLUMNE 453 422 332 0 305 297 10 265 0 12

VENTURA 2,571 2,510 2,217 0 2,191 1,853 86 1,718 13 179YOLO 2,555 1,711 715 460 331 429 20 338 25 52YUBA 1,121 902 396 0 410 392 8 308 17 16

i Incomplete data

Page 150: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 18 APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS QUESTIONS TRIALSFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING OF LAW DE NOVO

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 19,634 20,529 r 15,722 17,349 r 2,048 2,365 r 2,710 2,848 r 10,964 12,136 r

ALAMEDA 783 835 r 748 778 r 50 64 98 119 600 595 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 AMADOR 35 23 38 22 13 6 0 1 25 15 BUTTE 87 75 54 92 19 3 13 39 22 50 CALAVERAS 13 31 2 26 2 0 0 2 0 24 COLUSA 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 778 732 549 563 51 73 120 108 378 382 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 46 EL DORADO 93 104 94 93 11 11 26 12 57 70 FRESNO 263 338 r 296 303 41 52 9 36 246 215 GLENN 2 i 8 2 i 12 1 i 2 0 i 2 1 i 8

HUMBOLDT 79 54 47 39 11 6 7 9 29 24 IMPERIAL 27 i 13 22 i 23 1 i 0 0 i 0 21 i 23 INYO 7 5 3 4 0 0 1 2 2 2 KERN 260 248 187 205 0 0 64 70 123 135 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 13 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 15 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 50 54 17 35 0 8 0 7 17 20

LAKE 22 28 29 17 2 2 10 4 17 11 LASSEN 11 19 4 6 0 2 0 2 4 2 LOS ANGELES 6,857 7,242 4,495 4,601 606 679 731 726 3,158 3,196 MADERA 35 39 27 30 4 2 0 0 23 28 MARIN 207 190 182 157 1 41 47 2 134 114 MARIPOSA 10 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 MENDOCINO 41 i 41 35 i 45 8 i 18 27 i 27 0 i 0 MERCED 59 80 49 45 0 0 3 0 46 45 MODOC 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 151: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 18 APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS QUESTIONS TRIALSFILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING OF LAW DE NOVO

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 19,634 20,529 r 15,722 17,349 r 2,048 2,365 r 2,710 2,848 r 10,964 12,136 r

MONO 7 12 8 10 0 0 1 0 7 10 MONTEREY 33 39 22 37 12 11 10 26 0 0 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 73 96 51 121 5 7 1 0 45 114 NAPA 50 62 r 38 47 2 9 2 1 34 37 NEVADA 70 82 61 61 7 10 19 25 35 26 ORANGE 2,170 2,290 1,820 2,369 90 275 302 295 1,428 1,799 PLACER 138 180 105 202 r 10 24 43 18 52 160 rPLUMAS 4 2 6 6 0 0 0 5 6 1 RIVERSIDE 689 710 496 791 69 61 69 64 358 666

SACRAMENTO 581 524 449 487 36 11 52 78 361 398 SAN BENITO 7 10 6 12 1 1 0 3 5 8 SAN BERNARDINO 449 505 509 630 90 88 71 90 348 452 SAN DIEGO 2,151 2,085 2,023 2,046 506 547 244 210 1,273 1,289 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 47 SAN FRANCISCO 660 700 531 600 1 0 109 150 421 450 SAN JOAQUIN 263 333 266 275 47 26 6 39 213 210 SAN LUIS OBISPO 154 150 175 126 23 19 71 42 81 65

SAN MATEO 333 320 309 318 55 59 39 77 215 182 SANTA BARBARA 199 227 174 201 13 22 46 44 115 135 SANTA CLARA 632 705 650 713 71 37 154 189 425 487 SANTA CRUZ 218 147 145 147 37 37 39 34 69 76 SHASTA 72 99 r 77 85 r 25 22 r 2 4 50 59 rSIERRA 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 2 SISKIYOU 16 23 21 21 5 4 0 3 16 14 SOLANO 162 144 75 125 6 12 4 3 65 110 SONOMA 35 35 99 113 12 34 87 79 0 0

STANISLAUS 137 210 106 78 17 3 30 57 59 18 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 32 34 29 28 11 7 3 3 15 18 TEHAMA 20 21 3 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 TRINITY 3 i 5 2 i 10 1 i 2 1 i 5 0 i 3 TULARE 110 131 91 105 8 10 30 19 53 76 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 25 20 r 30 16 r 8 3 r 5 5 r 17 8 rVENTURA 388 398 413 413 52 49 102 101 259 263

YOLO 4 12 20 9 r 2 0 4 7 r 14 2 YUBA 23 31 25 19 3 5 5 2 17 12

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 152: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 19 HABEAS CORPUS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARING

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 11,868 9,938 r 10,304 8,734 r 7,767 6,299 r 2,537 2,435 r

ALAMEDA 855 637 r 850 638 r 377 301 r 473 337 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR 63 44 53 45 53 45 0 0 BUTTE 54 34 28 26 18 21 10 5 CALAVERAS 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 COLUSA 1 5 r 1 3 r 1 3 r 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 407 367 328 318 244 238 84 80 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 DEL NORTE 161 166 139 159 139 159 0 0 48 EL DORADO 46 61 39 60 13 37 26 23 FRESNO 476 417 r 231 139 231 138 0 1 GLENN 4 i 8 6 i 8 5 i 7 1 i 1

HUMBOLDT 139 145 113 140 82 98 31 42 IMPERIAL 61 i 106 51 i 96 43 i 95 8 i 1 INYO 9 2 5 1 5 1 0 0 KERN 343 216 295 173 291 173 4 0 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 258 204 246 199 245 199 1 0

LAKE 13 24 15 19 9 12 6 7 LASSEN 108 61 103 49 3 15 100 34 LOS ANGELES 2,010 2,091 2,053 1,885 1,549 1,326 504 559 MADERA 37 38 20 36 19 36 1 0 MARIN 131 189 105 189 99 160 6 29 MARIPOSA 0 5 0 3 0 3 0 0 MENDOCINO 24 i 42 20 i 42 15 i 38 5 i 4 MERCED 39 20 37 19 35 19 2 0 MODOC 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 153: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 19 HABEAS CORPUS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARING

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 11,868 9,938 r 10,304 8,734 r 7,767 6,299 r 2,537 2,435 r

MONO 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 MONTEREY 142 114 122 62 110 47 12 15 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 44 54 18 37 14 24 4 13 NEVADA 16 12 10 5 9 4 1 1 ORANGE 558 499 527 385 293 87 234 298 PLACER 31 19 28 20 10 12 18 8 PLUMAS 2 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 RIVERSIDE 357 253 344 236 340 222 4 14

SACRAMENTO 715 407 446 595 388 472 58 123 SAN BENITO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN BERNARDINO 662 532 371 339 353 329 18 10 SAN DIEGO 945 620 902 638 649 416 253 222 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 SAN FRANCISCO 282 209 275 195 239 168 36 27 SAN JOAQUIN 426 269 416 293 317 181 99 112 SAN LUIS OBISPO 245 276 236 237 220 212 16 25

SAN MATEO 94 79 76 77 69 69 7 8 SANTA BARBARA 231 190 216 171 159 131 57 40 SANTA CLARA 754 724 695 616 636 510 59 106 SANTA CRUZ 54 55 52 50 26 28 26 22 SHASTA 52 25 10 11 10 10 0 1 SIERRA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 13 14 17 13 17 10 0 3 SOLANO 370 273 319 160 80 37 239 123 SONOMA 90 55 66 49 53 46 13 3

STANISLAUS 78 54 78 54 66 32 12 22 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUTTER 11 16 r 12 17 3 3 9 14 TEHAMA 3 7 0 2 0 2 0 0 TRINITY 2 i 4 0 i 3 0 i 3 0 i 0 TULARE 83 41 38 24 26 21 12 3 TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUOLUMNE 50 41 r 53 26 r 41 18 r 12 8 rVENTURA 299 186 218 145 147 68 71 77

YOLO 1 7 7 11 4 0 3 11 YUBA 14 14 13 13 11 10 2 3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 154: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 20 DISPOSITIONS BY JURY TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

PERSONAL INJURY,

DEATH, AND ALL OTHERTOTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

a

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 9,275 9,530 r 1,926 1,807 r 5,904 6,329 r 1,445 1,394 r

ALAMEDA 329 289 r 58 59 r 162 136 r 109 94 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 BERKELEY MUNICIPAL 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 FREMONT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALPINE 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 AMADOR 4 7 3 0 0 5 1 2 BUTTE 47 79 14 6 28 69 5 4 CALAVERAS 12 6 3 0 7 6 2 0 COLUSA 8 7 r 2 3 r 6 4 r 0 0

CONTRA COSTA 274 260 25 33 226 202 23 25 BAY MUNICIPAL 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 WALNUT CREEK MUNICIPAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1 DEL NORTE 14 10 1 0 12 10 1 0 50 EL DORADO 42 52 8 11 28 40 6 1 FRESNO 229 208 19 39 187 147 23 22 GLENN 1 i 3 1 i 0 0 i 2 0 i 1

HUMBOLDT 35 33 7 4 25 28 3 1 IMPERIAL 14 i 30 5 i 5 6 i 24 3 i 1 INYO 7 3 1 2 3 1 3 0 KERN 352 332 27 28 315 290 10 14 BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 25 5 0 0 25 5 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KINGS 42 58 1 0 41 58 0 0

LAKE 34 37 4 1 30 33 0 3 LASSEN 14 33 1 4 13 29 0 0 LOS ANGELES 2,760 2,973 r 566 549 1,841 2,075 353 349 rMADERA 26 30 1 0 20 29 5 1 MARIN 89 78 11 14 60 48 18 16 MARIPOSA 2 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 MENDOCINO 11 i 30 0 i 4 10 i 25 1 i 1 MERCED 16 22 3 4 11 7 2 11 MODOC 2 2 0 0 1 2 1 0

a Includes civil complaints, eminent domain, probate and guardianship, and other civil petitions proceedings

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 155: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 20 DISPOSITIONS BY JURY TRIAL

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

PERSONAL INJURY,

DEATH, AND ALL OTHERTOTAL PROPERTY DAMAGE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

a

COUNTY 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 9,275 9,530 r 1,926 1,807 r 5,904 6,329 r 1,445 1,394 r

MONO 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 MONTEREY 64 66 17 22 40 24 7 20 MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA 30 33 8 13 17 15 5 5 NEVADA 22 14 9 6 12 5 1 3 ORANGE 678 709 215 219 362 391 101 99 PLACER 34 30 17 15 5 9 12 6 PLUMAS 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 RIVERSIDE 388 422 67 86 262 239 59 97

SACRAMENTO 305 314 r 71 33 197 248 37 33 rSAN BENITO 12 8 1 1 6 5 5 2 SAN BERNARDINO 245 196 69 50 111 85 65 61 SAN DIEGO 1,001 1,017 224 190 483 584 294 243 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 42 30 0 0 42 29 0 1

1 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 21 15 7 1 14 14 0 0 51 SAN FRANCISCO 251 314 123 123 81 103 47 88 SAN JOAQUIN 144 164 26 19 91 129 27 16 SAN LUIS OBISPO 40 56 10 15 16 22 14 19

SAN MATEO 103 110 25 18 60 84 18 8 SANTA BARBARA 68 66 r 29 24 24 29 r 15 13 SANTA CLARA 439 370 68 57 317 280 54 33 SANTA CRUZ 59 61 19 28 29 28 11 5 SHASTA 79 89 r 15 8 53 72 r 11 9 SIERRA 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 SISKIYOU 16 11 2 2 14 8 0 1 SOLANO 128 95 5 4 118 86 5 5 SONOMA 87 121 11 16 61 82 15 23

STANISLAUS 172 192 20 22 138 157 14 13 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 9 16 3 5 4 7 2 4 SUTTER 27 13 5 5 19 7 3 1 TEHAMA 27 21 2 1 23 19 2 1 TRINITY 2 i 3 0 i 1 2 i 2 0 i 0 TULARE 135 108 26 10 100 91 9 7 TULARE MUNICIPAL 19 19 r 0 0 19 19 r 0 0 TUOLUMNE 17 28 r 6 5 r 10 22 r 1 1 rVENTURA 176 156 58 31 86 106 32 19

YOLO 25 39 1 5 20 27 4 7 YUBA 16 19 4 3 8 12 4 4

a Includes civil complaints, eminent domain, probate and guardianship, and other civil petitions proceedings

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 156: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 21 TOTAL CASES SET FOR TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

NUMBER CASES SET FOR TRIAL AT END OF MONTH TOTAL CASESOF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIAL

POSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 988.6 967.6 r 46,935 48,477 r 35,572 37,850 r 11,363 10,627 r 51 a 52 a

ALAMEDA 39.0 39.0 — i 1,509 — i 1,157 — i 352 — 39 ALPINE 1.0 1.0 6 3 6 2 0 1 6 3 AMADOR 1.0 1.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —BUTTE 7.0 6.0 r 504 498 368 394 136 104 72 83 rCALAVERAS 1.0 1.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —

COLUSA 1.0 1.0 22 30 r 16 20 r 6 10 r 22 30 rCONTRA COSTA 23.0 22.0 r 906 1,003 595 668 311 335 39 46 rDEL NORTE 1.0 1.0 — — — — — — — — EL DORADO 5.0 5.0 319 310 231 264 88 46 64 62 FRESNO 22.0 22.0 1,070 1,152 651 684 419 468 49 52

GLENN 1.0 1.0 7 11 4 7 3 4 7 11 HUMBOLDT 3.0 3.0 179 — i 129 — i 50 — i 60 —IMPERIAL 4.0 3.0 128 104 128 104 — — — —

1 INYO 1.0 1.0 29 23 23 16 6 7 29 23 52 KERN 18.0 18.0 1,242 728 744 446 498 282 69 40

KINGS 4.0 4.0 106 75 46 38 60 37 27 19 LAKE 2.0 2.0 79 94 68 68 11 26 40 47 LASSEN 1.0 1.0 35 4 14 4 21 — 35 — LOS ANGELES 313.2 309.2 17,378 17,066 14,055 14,521 3,323 2,545 55 55 MADERA 3.0 3.0 371 291 184 171 187 120 124 97

MARIN 8.0 8.0 342 281 r 277 237 r 65 44 r 43 35 rMARIPOSA 1.0 1.0 19 11 14 7 5 4 19 11 MENDOCINO 3.0 3.0 — i 221 — i 139 — i 82 — 74 MERCED 4.0 4.0 313 271 196 204 117 67 78 68 MODOC 1.0 1.0 8 9 0 6 8 3 8 9

MONO 1.0 1.0 20 28 18 22 2 6 20 28 MONTEREY 8.0 8.0 452 345 348 281 104 64 57 43 NAPA 5.0 4.0 189 172 151 147 38 25 38 43 NEVADA 3.0 3.0 142 163 114 143 28 20 47 54 ORANGE 79.0 76.0 3,519 3,841 2,899 3,256 620 585 45 51

a Excludes courts missing data on cases set for trial r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 157: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 21 TOTAL CASES SET FOR TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

NUMBER CASES SET FOR TRIAL AT END OF MONTH TOTAL CASESOF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIAL

POSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 988.6 967.6 r 46,935 48,477 r 35,572 37,850 r 11,363 10,627 r 51 a 52 a

PLACER 7.0 6.0 r 269 182 237 103 32 79 38 30 rPLUMAS 1.0 1.0 6 57 5 35 1 22 6 57 RIVERSIDE 34.0 32.0 1,728 2,650 680 1,683 1,048 967 51 83 SACRAMENTO 38.0 37.0 1,993 1,291 1,480 838 513 453 52 35 SAN BENITO 1.0 1.0 32 49 9 17 23 32 32 49

SAN BERNARDINO 36.0 34.0 1,414 1,273 990 901 424 372 39 37 SAN DIEGO 78.0 78.0 2,933 2,983 2,933 2,983 — — — — SAN FRANCISCO 40.0 40.0 2,722 2,188 2,219 1,785 503 403 68 55 SAN JOAQUIN 14.0 14.0 518 690 292 431 226 259 37 49 SAN LUIS OBISPO 6.0 6.0 262 269 209 248 53 21 44 45

SAN MATEO 19.0 19.0 1,026 1,051 769 837 257 214 54 55 SANTA BARBARA 11.0 11.0 394 494 325 354 69 140 36 45 SANTA CLARA 49.0 49.0 1,644 1,988 809 1,129 835 859 34 41

1 SANTA CRUZ 6.0 6.0 285 304 192 211 93 93 48 51 53 SHASTA 6.0 5.0 307 371 r 173 170 r 134 201 r 51 74

SIERRA 1.0 1.0 2 5 0 3 2 2 2 5 SISKIYOU 1.0 1.0 66 36 32 19 34 17 66 36 SOLANO 12.0 10.0 357 312 76 71 281 241 30 31 SONOMA 10.0 10.0 598 670 358 423 240 247 60 67 STANISLAUS 12.4 11.4 1,465 1,719 1,244 1,460 221 259 118 151

SUTTER 3.0 3.0 90 99 51 62 39 37 30 33 TEHAMA 2.0 2.0 65 57 40 40 25 17 33 29 TRINITY 1.0 1.0 — i 24 — i 13 — i 11 — 24 TULARE 9.0 9.0 475 468 407 368 68 100 53 52 TUOLUMNE 2.0 2.0 114 146 r 79 122 r 35 24 r 57 73 r

VENTURA 17.0 17.0 580 654 580 419 — 235 — 38 YOLO 5.0 5.0 99 121 29 55 70 66 20 24 YUBA 3.0 3.0 106 83 75 64 31 19 35 28

a Excludes courts missing data on cases set for trial r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 158: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 22 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONS

JUDICIAL POSITIONTOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 988.6 967.6 r 805 789 40.6 40.6 r 143.0 138.0 r 1080.4 1068.5 r

ALAMEDA 39.0 39.0 34 34 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 42.3 40.5 ALPINE 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 AMADOR 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.7 rBUTTE 7.0 6.0 r 5 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 r 7.2 6.0 rCALAVERAS 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5

COLUSA 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 CONTRA COSTA 23.0 22.0 r 18 17 4.0 4.0 r 1.0 1.0 25.8 26.4 DEL NORTE 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.2 EL DORADO 5.0 5.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.5 6.1 FRESNO 22.0 22.0 17 17 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 23.7 23.7

GLENN 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0 HUMBOLDT 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.5 IMPERIAL 4.0 3.0 4 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 3.8

1 INYO 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 i 1.0 54 KERN 18.0 18.0 15 15 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 19.1 19.0

KINGS 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 LAKE 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.5 LASSEN 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.1 LOS ANGELES 313.2 309.2 238 238 11.2 11.2 64.0 60.0 347.4 344.0 rMADERA 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1

MARIN 8.0 8.0 6 6 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 9.1 8.8 MARIPOSA 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 MENDOCINO 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 3.6 MERCED 4.0 4.0 3 3 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.3 MODOC 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0

MONO 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 MONTEREY 8.0 8.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 8.1 NAPA 5.0 4.0 4 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.9 3.7 NEVADA 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 3.3 ORANGE 79.0 76.0 61 59 4.0 4.0 14.0 13.0 87.0 87.1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 159: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 22 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONS

JUDICIAL POSITIONTOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 988.6 967.6 r 805 789 40.6 40.6 r 143.0 138.0 r 1080.4 1068.5 r

PLACER 7.0 6.0 r 5 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 r 6.6 6.5 rPLUMAS 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 RIVERSIDE 34.0 32.0 26 24 0.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 33.5 32.7 SACRAMENTO 38.0 37.0 33 32 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 42.5 44.0 rSAN BENITO 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.4

SAN BERNARDINO 36.0 34.0 30 28 1.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 38.7 38.7 SAN DIEGO 78.0 78.0 71 71 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 86.3 84.8 rSAN FRANCISCO 40.0 40.0 29 29 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 43.4 42.7 SAN JOAQUIN 14.0 14.0 13 13 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 14.9 14.6 SAN LUIS OBISPO 6.0 6.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.3 6.8

SAN MATEO 19.0 19.0 17 17 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 19.9 20.1 SANTA BARBARA 11.0 11.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 12.1 11.6 SANTA CLARA 49.0 49.0 44 44 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 55.7 54.8

1 SANTA CRUZ 6.0 6.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.3 6.3 55 SHASTA 6.0 5.0 5 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 7.1 5.9

SIERRA 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 SISKIYOU 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.9 SOLANO 12.0 10.0 9 7 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 10.4 10.5 SONOMA 10.0 10.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 10.8 10.7 STANISLAUS 12.4 11.4 9 8 0.4 0.4 3.0 3.0 12.4 11.6

SUTTER 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.2 TEHAMA 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.2 TRINITY 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 i 1.2 TULARE 9.0 9.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 9.6 9.2 TUOLUMNE 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.2

VENTURA 17.0 17.0 15 15 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 21.0 19.8 YOLO 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.2 5.4 YUBA 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 160: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 23 CASE-PROCESSING TIME—CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97

CIVIL CRIMINALa

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 12 > 12Months Months Months Months Months Months

COUNTY (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 100 0

STATE TOTAL 56 76 86 14 94 6

ALAMEDA — i — i — i — i — i — iALPINE 25 75 100 0 100 0 AMADOR — i — i — i — i 100 i 0 iBUTTE 57 77 85 15 95 5 CALAVERAS — i — i — i — i — i — i

COLUSA 85 93 95 5 97 3CONTRA COSTA 83 94 98 2 95 5 DEL NORTE 52 58 70 30 96 4 EL DORADO 59 72 76 24 94 6 FRESNO 54 77 89 11 — i — i

GLENN 67 77 79 21 96 4 HUMBOLDT — i — i — i — i — i — i

1 IMPERIAL — i — i — i — i — i — i56 INYO 65 85 91 9 95 5 KERN 61 84 94 6 98 i 2 i

KINGS 69 86 92 8 98 2 LAKE 58 83 92 8 92 8 LASSEN 63 73 81 19 97 3 LOS ANGELES 49 71 83 17 — i — iMADERA 54 79 94 6 93 7

MARIN 59 78 89 11 92 8 MARIPOSA — i — i — i — i 93 8 MENDOCINO 45 i 70 i 86 i 14 i 90 i 10 iMERCED 43 65 79 21 96 4 MODOC 61 83 83 17 86 14

MONO 40 78 98 3 100 0 MONTEREY 69 79 84 16 99 1 NAPA — i — i — i — i — i — iNEVADA 66 88 95 5 92 8 ORANGE 59 80 88 12 94 6

PLACER 79 93 97 3 — i — iPLUMAS 42 63 75 25 88 12 RIVERSIDE 56 74 84 16 97 3 SACRAMENTO 48 74 90 10 87 13 SAN BENITO 48 71 83 17 90 10

a Measured from first appearance in municipal court to superior court disposition

i Incomplete data

Page 161: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

SUPERIOR COURTS TABLE 23 CASE-PROCESSING TIME—CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97

CIVIL CRIMINALa

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 12 > 12Months Months Months Months Months Months

COUNTY (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 100 0

STATE TOTAL 56 76 86 14 94 6

SAN BERNARDINO 37 62 82 18 93 7 SAN DIEGO 71 93 97 3 97 3 SAN FRANCISCO — i — i — i — i 89 11 SAN JOAQUIN 44 66 82 18 97 3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 55 76 83 17 96 4

SAN MATEO 64 76 81 19 97 3 SANTA BARBARA 65 83 92 8 96 4 SANTA CLARA 52 69 81 19 93 7 SANTA CRUZ 46 61 70 30 96 4 SHASTA 66 88 94 6 90 10

SIERRA 55 64 73 27 88 12

1 SISKIYOU 56 89 93 7 100 0 57 SOLANO 57 77 86 14 94 6 SONOMA 49 71 80 20 91 9 STANISLAUS — i — i — i — i — i — i

SUTTER 62 83 89 11 100 0 TEHAMA 59 74 85 15 99 1 TRINITY 0 i 33 i 33 i 67 i 86 i 14 iTULARE 80 93 96 4 90 10 TUOLUMNE 54 75 87 13 94 6

VENTURA 79 87 91 9 — i — iYOLO 38 66 84 16 78 22 YUBA 47 63 68 32 98 2

a Measured from first appearance in municipal court to superior court disposition

i Incomplete data

Page 162: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING PARKING)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALNUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILEJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 675 670 7,705,523 7,872,482 r 7,544,617 7,671,644 r 6,818,901 6,943,399 r 372,586 360,422 r 337,464 339,584 r 15,666 28,239 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 34 33 341,700 348,134 329,132 344,821 r 303,667 312,113 12,497 17,589 r 12,965 15,118 r 3 1ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 1 1 20,117 22,823 19,481 19,425 17,776 17,561 537 620 1,168 1,243 0 1 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 4 4 32,729 33,161 29,967 30,956 r 28,236 28,884 540 892 r 1,191 1,180 r 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 4 4 63,556 68,246 65,364 68,404 60,756 63,149 2,035 2,106 2,572 3,149 1 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 3 2 46,180 42,392 42,753 44,267 39,507 37,333 1,990 5,577 1,254 1,357 2 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 14 14 103,636 107,519 97,085 101,188 89,353 91,311 4,038 4,803 3,694 5,074 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 8 8 75,482 73,993 74,482 80,554 68,039 73,864 3,357 3,578 3,086 3,112 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR — — 0 0 0 27 0 11 0 13 0 3 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 1 1 2,607 2,255 1,576 1,438 1,520 1,381 51 54 5 3 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 1 1 11,602 12,014 7,040 9,289 6,678 8,954 175 174 187 161 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 4 4 40,774 40,410 34,223 37,513 31,160 34,512 827 913 1,389 1,698 847 390

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2 2 27,610 27,685 22,939 25,142 21,223 23,625 539 541 891 975 286 1 59 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2 2 13,164 12,725 11,284 12,371 9,937 10,887 288 372 498 723 561 389 CALAVERAS COUNTY

CALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 1 1 8,248 10,236 7,885 8,879 7,213 8,194 176 192 496 493 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 1 1 9,949 10,895 8,387 9,844 8,154 9,603 63 63 170 178 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 14 14 185,875 179,543 185,497 173,662 r 161,327 150,505 r 7,114 6,560 r 13,938 14,180 r 3,118 2,417BAY MUNICIPAL 5 5 59,352 54,894 57,909 51,140 r 49,564 43,189 r 2,676 2,597 r 4,990 4,550 r 679 804 DELTA MUNICIPAL 2 2 39,233 36,347 36,271 35,247 31,420 30,890 1,367 1,479 2,514 2,339 970 539 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 4 4 45,083 43,617 44,993 42,083 39,859 37,334 1,522 1,442 2,920 2,737 692 570 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 3 3 42,207 44,685 43,627 42,837 38,065 36,877 1,282 905 3,503 4,551 777 504 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR — — 0 0 2,697 2,355 2,419 2,215 267 137 11 3 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 1 1 6,588 8,115 10,539 9,306 r 9,640 8,383 138 116 r 470 513 291 294

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 3 3 31,129 32,333 r 28,980 32,151 r 25,259 27,918 r 1,132 1,030 r 1,820 2,390 r 769 813 r

FRESNO COUNTY 18 18 160,669 155,928 142,022 140,401 131,396 129,625 5,005 4,727 5,621 6,049 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 8 8 50,403 51,360 45,430 44,767 43,341 42,887 1,307 1,120 782 760 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 10 10 110,266 104,568 96,592 95,634 88,055 86,738 3,698 3,607 4,839 5,289 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 1 1 9,846 10,712 7,483 9,326 7,000 8,778 205 216 278 332 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 4 4 29,272 30,665 25,449 27,727 23,076 25,290 1,460 1,208 906 1,227 7 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 163: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING PARKING)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALNUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILEJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 675 670 7,705,523 7,872,482 r 7,544,617 7,671,644 r 6,818,901 6,943,399 r 372,586 360,422 r 337,464 339,584 r 15,666 28,239 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 5 4 49,493 54,922 39,390 37,731 r 37,337 35,419 r 872 966 r 1,181 1,328 r 0 18

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 1 1 16,422 17,152 15,775 16,772 15,258 16,181 4 10 513 581 0 0

KERN COUNTY 17 15 168,152 167,622 156,915 152,669 143,448 139,670 5,139 4,946 8,172 7,579 156 474BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 9 9 78,148 74,248 71,948 68,390 65,174 62,196 3,834 3,634 2,940 2,560 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 2 2 34,517 36,396 33,188 33,576 31,630 31,945 591 597 967 1,016 0 18 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 3 2 18,434 18,177 15,429 15,853 14,420 14,746 288 318 721 789 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 3 2 37,053 38,801 36,350 34,850 32,224 30,783 426 397 3,544 3,214 156 456

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 4 4 29,891 28,605 r 30,160 30,945 r 26,769 28,409 r 2,432 1,420 r 959 1,116 r 0 0

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 2 2 11,640 12,906 10,381 14,542 7,809 11,099 2,211 2,963 361 480 0 0

1 LASSEN COUNTY60 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 1 1 8,902 12,153 8,565 10,091 7,828 9,410 209 216 528 465 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 190 189 2,384,350 2,379,148 2,427,697 2,350,715 2,224,903 2,158,013 83,153 84,386 r 119,638 108,311 r 3 5ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 3 3 56,746 61,152 58,936 63,855 55,222 60,152 709 680 3,005 3,023 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 5 5 57,938 60,463 60,520 64,457 56,422 60,108 1,421 1,468 2,677 2,881 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 3 3 34,519 34,908 37,763 37,089 34,411 33,172 1,722 2,543 1,630 1,374 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 2 2 28,877 32,238 30,407 34,109 27,797 31,490 1,235 1,265 1,375 1,354 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 8 7 114,254 119,294 114,055 124,685 103,902 113,087 5,172 6,235 4,981 5,363 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 9 9 97,154 102,880 97,526 98,412 89,900 90,952 5,327 4,982 2,297 2,478 2 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 2 2 32,020 32,080 31,248 31,272 29,222 28,936 832 873 1,194 1,463 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 5 5 61,136 56,847 60,949 53,978 55,582 48,796 2,495 2,591 r 2,872 2,591 r 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 5 5 56,246 60,055 64,602 64,799 59,192 59,037 3,318 3,671 2,092 2,091 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 3 3 50,284 52,182 51,478 55,011 46,572 49,987 2,719 2,568 2,187 2,456 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 6 6 67,604 67,539 67,286 65,784 60,485 58,146 2,652 3,082 4,149 4,556 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 10 10 140,286 137,334 134,722 135,818 123,104 124,548 7,682 8,108 3,936 3,162 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 89 89 954,216 933,702 999,606 899,410 915,336 829,410 23,472 20,447 60,798 49,553 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 3 3 38,960 38,418 36,207 39,226 32,010 34,934 2,560 2,763 1,637 1,529 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 1 1 48,161 41,599 46,323 39,878 44,012 38,332 340 278 1,971 1,268 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 3 3 73,129 72,836 70,935 73,938 67,825 70,799 553 553 2,556 2,585 1 1 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 4 4 49,809 58,151 54,328 55,094 48,681 49,096 2,663 3,254 2,984 2,740 0 4 POMONA MUNICIPAL 3 3 77,387 85,847 74,744 84,110 70,127 78,936 1,938 2,293 r 2,679 2,881 r 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 4 4 57,651 52,985 55,357 51,143 49,702 45,012 3,508 4,031 2,147 2,100 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 1 1 28,435 29,385 29,669 32,092 27,786 30,022 908 947 975 1,123 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 3 3 36,327 34,753 34,908 32,569 32,517 30,023 635 796 1,756 1,750 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 164: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING PARKING)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALNUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILEJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 675 670 7,705,523 7,872,482 r 7,544,617 7,671,644 r 6,818,901 6,943,399 r 372,586 360,422 r 337,464 339,584 r 15,666 28,239 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 9 9 101,389 96,896 102,891 101,086 93,528 91,136 5,172 5,299 4,191 4,651 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 5 5 73,939 71,112 66,826 67,540 60,009 61,342 3,867 3,231 2,950 2,967 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 4 4 47,883 46,492 46,411 45,360 41,559 40,560 2,253 2,428 2,599 2,372 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 4 4 28,419 29,900 23,948 24,306 21,230 21,716 1,178 933 1,305 1,381 235 276

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 4 4 56,479 54,195 56,319 57,076 50,270 51,568 1,900 1,723 4,149 3,785 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 1 1 2,457 3,109 1,776 2,144 1,552 1,899 89 76 126 144 9 25

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 7 7 20,625 21,352 r 19,662 19,414 18,277 18,144 451 448 933 821 1 1

MERCED COUNTY

1 MERCED MUNICIPAL 3 3 60,338 61,249 55,386 56,203 51,363 52,746 2,119 1,772 1,904 1,683 0 2 61 MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 1 1 3,510 3,002 2,603 2,528 2,366 2,340 116 109 121 79 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 1 1 5,083 6,911 5,583 6,777 5,259 6,316 61 161 263 300 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 86,400 85,490 81,925 75,421 76,148 69,619 2,884 2,642 2,893 3,160 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 10 10 84,723 83,764 80,408 72,803 74,903 67,235 2,756 2,495 2,749 3,073 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR — — 1,677 1,726 1,517 2,618 1,245 2,384 128 147 144 87 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 2 3 23,135 18,969 r 21,943 18,448 r 19,974 16,174 228 547 1,032 990 r 709 737

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 3 3 20,122 23,718 r 17,089 21,645 14,670 19,010 703 648 916 1,226 800 761

ORANGE COUNTY 47 47 643,420 666,406 691,080 707,668 641,713 641,757 21,556 21,552 r 24,369 27,023 r 3,442 17,336CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 13 13 123,940 126,385 153,880 179,441 142,230 166,505 7,287 6,481 3,891 4,114 472 2,341 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 12 12 190,064 198,259 205,631 176,799 193,535 159,353 4,800 5,543 6,780 8,170 516 3,733 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 8 8 92,564 99,992 98,570 110,869 91,450 100,481 2,152 2,151 r 4,196 4,775 r 772 3,462 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 4 4 109,986 110,563 108,580 112,990 101,897 103,548 1,789 1,916 4,233 4,047 661 3,479 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 10 10 126,866 131,207 124,419 127,569 112,601 111,870 5,528 5,461 5,269 5,917 1,021 4,321

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 4 4 60,322 59,992 57,692 58,039 53,073 53,089 2,124 2,210 2,495 2,719 0 21

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 1 1 3,659 i 2,279 i 2,684 i 2,139 i 2,465 i 1,965 i 132 i 49 i 86 i 116 i 1 i 9 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 165: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING PARKING)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALNUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILEJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 675 670 7,705,523 7,872,482 r 7,544,617 7,671,644 r 6,818,901 6,943,399 r 372,586 360,422 r 337,464 339,584 r 15,666 28,239 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 22 22 320,696 349,307 r 300,215 315,911 r 274,533 288,191 r 13,351 13,571 r 12,331 14,149 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 7 7 83,463 92,363 83,120 79,749 76,831 73,196 2,530 2,510 3,759 4,043 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 4 4 55,592 57,905 r 52,990 59,415 50,143 55,774 2,072 2,479 775 1,162 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 2 2 46,023 44,287 40,422 43,310 37,431 40,485 1,508 1,378 1,483 1,447 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 9 9 135,618 154,752 r 123,683 133,437 r 110,128 118,736 r 7,241 7,204 r 6,314 7,497 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 17 17 221,939 233,771 199,004 206,387 166,959 172,480 21,342 21,769 10,703 12,138 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 16 16 212,143 222,622 r 189,767 196,276 158,405 163,781 21,168 20,912 10,194 11,583 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 1 1 9,796 11,149 r 9,237 10,111 r 8,554 8,699 174 857 r 509 555 r 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 1 1 8,859 9,756 8,112 8,017 7,401 7,297 348 265 363 455 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 30 30 391,497 398,078 393,530 368,372 r 322,649 316,829 54,884 35,540 r 15,450 15,120 r 547 883

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 56 56 564,597 603,558 550,538 575,404 493,887 521,063 28,272 25,757 28,379 28,584 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 10 10 94,522 92,205 88,577 86,543 79,588 77,064 5,272 5,951 3,717 3,528 0 0 62 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 11 11 154,866 174,327 149,382 157,417 133,686 141,040 7,985 8,293 7,711 8,084 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 28 28 238,269 251,329 238,501 248,508 212,322 224,842 13,304 10,204 12,875 13,462 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 7 7 76,940 85,697 74,078 82,936 68,291 78,117 1,711 1,309 4,076 3,510 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 164,296 179,546 162,832 221,365 109,064 164,604 47,625 49,255 6,143 7,506 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 20 20 164,232 179,417 162,787 221,248 109,019 164,487 47,625 49,255 6,143 7,506 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR — — 64 129 45 117 45 117 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 12 12 132,882 141,246 121,239 156,576 r 109,642 143,676 r 6,925 7,144 4,671 5,749 r 1 7LODI MUNICIPAL 2 2 21,656 23,463 18,910 18,522 r 17,361 16,963 r 808 710 741 849 r 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 3 3 33,751 36,423 30,202 50,071 r 27,687 47,017 1,077 1,269 1,437 1,781 r 1 4 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 7 7 71,914 76,028 68,024 83,874 60,492 75,593 5,039 5,165 2,493 3,116 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR — — 5,561 5,332 4,103 4,109 4,102 4,103 1 0 0 3 0 3

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 5 5 65,794 71,942 66,710 67,052 63,573 63,552 1,240 1,242 1,897 2,258 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 9 9 152,634 157,219 r 138,571 147,904 129,122 137,223 4,525 5,171 r 4,924 5,505 r 0 5

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 9 8 100,671 104,284 93,762 96,410 r 88,784 89,754 1,872 3,632 r 3,106 3,016 0 8NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 5 4 47,033 47,047 49,230 50,259 r 46,751 47,454 869 1,063 r 1,610 1,734 0 8 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 4 4 53,638 57,237 44,532 46,151 42,033 42,300 1,003 2,569 1,496 1,282 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 35 35 353,712 353,441 334,853 386,440 r 313,699 364,461 10,124 10,575 r 11,030 11,404 r 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 5 5 54,273 56,059 51,956 51,316 47,868 47,406 1,404 1,405 2,545 2,417 139 88

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 166: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ALL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING PARKING)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALNUMBER OF TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILEJUDGESHIPS FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 675 670 7,705,523 7,872,482 r 7,544,617 7,671,644 r 6,818,901 6,943,399 r 372,586 360,422 r 337,464 339,584 r 15,666 28,239 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 4 4 40,442 43,797 r 46,387 43,575 r 42,583 39,943 r 1,925 1,990 r 1,879 1,642 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 1 1 977 942 882 874 820 809 6 4 56 61 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 3 3 20,419 19,380 15,519 15,628 13,847 13,772 675 956 997 900 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 7 7 100,710 98,082 96,153 96,790 89,792 90,690 2,774 2,535 3,587 3,565 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 4 4 69,106 67,942 67,337 68,673 64,247 65,596 1,365 1,305 1,725 1,772 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 3 3 31,604 30,140 28,816 28,117 25,545 25,094 1,409 1,230 1,862 1,793 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 6 6 83,293 83,894 80,038 85,191 70,549 76,208 2,540 2,980 2,718 2,743 4,231 3,260

STANISLAUS COUNTY 83,297 85,123 80,782 86,590 r 72,464 78,252 r 4,762 4,109 r 3,556 4,229 r 0 0STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 8 8 83,297 85,123 78,365 84,564 70,383 76,569 4,624 3,982 3,358 4,013 0 0

1 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR — — 0 0 2,417 2,026 r 2,081 1,683 r 138 127 r 198 216 r 0 0 63 SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 2 2 17,888 18,948 15,826 17,145 13,870 15,067 946 904 1,010 1,174 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 2 2 17,114 16,627 16,133 15,937 14,764 14,574 511 495 502 468 356 400

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 1 1 4,028 3,826 3,340 3,044 2,727 2,313 458 572 154 159 1 0

TULARE COUNTY 75,160 84,056 r 70,666 63,783 r 65,446 59,088 r 2,182 1,955 r 3,038 2,740 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 9 9 73,211 81,885 r 69,125 62,501 r 64,012 57,920 r 2,136 1,884 r 2,977 2,697 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR — — 1,949 2,171 r 1,541 1,282 r 1,434 1,168 r 46 71 r 61 43 r 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 2 2 10,127 10,867 9,210 10,078 7,968 8,863 771 691 471 521 0 3

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 12 12 144,522 142,137 133,872 130,369 122,823 118,816 5,012 5,552 6,037 6,001 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 4 4 37,901 37,912 28,557 19,807 26,292 17,912 998 1,114 1,267 781 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 2 2 16,717 18,364 11,144 12,049 9,973 10,756 710 620 461 670 0 3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 167: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 2 FELONY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS AND SENTENCING ON FELONY GUILTY PLEAS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING SENTENCINGTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED ON PLEAS OF

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS GUILTY

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 251,575 245,587 r 233,645 229,815 r 160,792 156,075 r 48,732 49,650 r 24,121 24,090 r 27,948 27,805 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 9,174 8,791 8,706 8,398 6,911 6,830 1,378 1,263 417 305 0 0 rALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 362 335 368 378 330 349 35 29 3 0 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 494 593 404 560 326 416 73 135 5 9 0 0 rFREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 1,083 1,124 1,027 1,115 848 978 168 127 11 10 0 0 rLIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 451 401 483 425 359 335 43 24 81 66 0 0 rOAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 5,476 5,106 4,934 4,607 3,866 3,602 998 892 70 113 0 0 rSAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 1,308 1,232 1,490 1,313 1,182 1,150 61 56 247 107 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 22 36 23 35 19 26 4 7 0 2 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 540 377 433 307 332 232 101 75 0 0 150 109

BUTTE COUNTY 1,350 1,473 765 1,373 527 865 133 361 105 147 0 6

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 31 495 36 434 33 370 3 61 0 3 0 6 64 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,319 978 729 939 494 495 130 300 105 144 0 0 CALAVERAS COUNTY

CALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 183 249 157 168 118 80 2 11 37 77 12 12

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 305 232 176 174 140 142 35 31 1 1 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 5,829 5,712 5,307 4,742 3,382 3,061 1,623 1,418 302 263 29 0BAY MUNICIPAL 2,596 2,577 1,386 1,308 595 623 648 597 143 88 29 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 1,569 1,484 704 696 277 238 367 375 60 83 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 1,297 1,278 694 557 341 251 305 281 48 25 0 0 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 367 373 138 149 44 53 46 32 48 64 0 0 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 2,385 2,032 2,125 1,896 257 133 3 3 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 552 630 650 821 r 389 580 64 54 r 197 187 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 988 887 r 916 793 r 786 566 r 19 21 r 111 206 r 303 190 r

FRESNO COUNTY 10,854 11,028 9,626 9,750 7,828 7,827 523 484 1,275 1,439 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 2,297 2,327 2,118 2,150 1,627 1,723 195 126 296 301 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 8,557 8,701 7,508 7,600 6,201 6,104 328 358 979 1,138 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 335 260 220 256 163 200 26 34 31 22 9 3

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,281 915 709 760 356 531 331 228 22 1 64 247

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 168: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 2 FELONY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS AND SENTENCING ON FELONY GUILTY PLEAS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING SENTENCINGTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED ON PLEAS OF

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS GUILTY

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 251,575 245,587 r 233,645 229,815 r 160,792 156,075 r 48,732 49,650 r 24,121 24,090 r 27,948 27,805 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 1,597 1,788 1,430 1,691 1,268 1,425 10 27 r 152 239 r 304 327

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 240 237 202 197 170 174 0 0 32 23 0 0

KERN COUNTY 6,056 6,606 5,968 6,503 3,366 4,190 2,120 1,848 482 465 14 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 3,680 4,064 3,868 4,261 2,244 2,811 1,624 1,448 0 2 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 807 858 728 800 399 504 211 146 118 150 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 975 1,017 788 807 467 530 141 93 180 184 14 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 594 667 584 635 256 345 144 161 184 129 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 1,134 1,049 1,071 914 348 250 361 360 362 304 4 4

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 374 406 286 482 197 302 61 74 28 106 95 165

1 LASSEN COUNTY65 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 395 279 331 271 265 205 48 63 18 3 153 114

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 63,910 66,609 63,122 65,262 34,474 35,297 11,521 12,745 r 17,127 17,220 r 4,521 5,466ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 651 731 650 715 304 423 0 0 346 292 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 2,254 2,152 2,176 2,194 1,568 1,643 0 0 608 551 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 651 510 564 515 207 229 357 286 0 0 21 6 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 400 532 443 504 194 201 249 303 0 0 25 22 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 1,730 2,009 1,732 1,994 762 818 0 135 970 1,041 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 4,795 5,670 4,925 5,722 3,140 3,709 1,783 2,012 2 1 124 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 930 825 875 773 513 448 362 324 0 1 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 1,004 1,016 998 986 221 201 0 0 r 777 785 r 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 1,363 1,360 1,312 1,292 486 583 825 709 1 0 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 827 1,078 913 1,084 486 553 427 531 0 0 310 297 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 2,764 3,176 2,668 2,916 1,457 1,449 1,211 1,466 0 1 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 3,402 3,375 3,245 3,368 2,308 2,220 936 1,146 1 2 43 26 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 30,082 30,420 29,536 29,776 15,447 15,513 0 0 14,089 14,263 1,633 2,754 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 1,020 944 972 946 432 202 540 744 0 0 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 269 349 311 337 265 290 43 45 3 2 149 172 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 863 805 851 802 526 493 0 28 325 281 395 362 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 1,568 1,714 1,713 1,753 1,238 1,198 475 555 0 0 656 766 POMONA MUNICIPAL 1,427 1,462 1,416 1,466 775 801 640 665 1 0 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 1,727 2,131 1,695 2,064 804 942 890 1,122 1 0 1 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 687 685 691 651 417 348 273 303 1 0 24 5 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 567 577 608 715 397 469 209 246 2 0 210 189

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 169: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 2 FELONY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS AND SENTENCING ON FELONY GUILTY PLEAS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING SENTENCINGTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED ON PLEAS OF

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS GUILTY

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 251,575 245,587 r 233,645 229,815 r 160,792 156,075 r 48,732 49,650 r 24,121 24,090 r 27,948 27,805 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 1,692 1,859 1,756 1,752 1,229 1,219 527 533 0 0 930 867 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 1,875 1,979 1,825 1,762 792 831 1,033 931 0 0 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 1,362 1,250 1,247 1,175 506 514 741 661 0 0 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 1,735 1,864 1,839 1,858 1,167 1,327 294 197 378 334 1 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 1,251 1,166 1,280 1,028 935 810 302 174 43 44 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 141 206 82 143 10 37 40 56 32 50 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 1,241 1,177 908 1,007 715 796 121 134 72 77 0 8

MERCED COUNTY

1 MERCED MUNICIPAL 2,730 2,365 2,181 1,983 1,755 1,669 352 230 74 84 89 63 66 MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 189 151 122 129 89 89 26 40 7 0 26 36

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 153 172 176 193 114 132 0 0 62 61 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 2,312 1,977 2,232 2,276 1,441 1,382 790 894 1 0 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 2,312 1,977 2,232 2,276 1,441 1,382 790 894 1 0 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 863 838 884 886 805 639 79 247 0 0 0 0

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 523 570 651 549 238 254 409 136 4 159 1 0

ORANGE COUNTY 15,247 13,401 15,422 12,501 12,097 9,706 2,800 2,512 r 525 283 r 8,191 6,106CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 4,314 4,100 5,632 4,507 4,147 3,494 1,447 1,012 38 1 2,133 1,754 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 4,276 4,003 3,658 3,282 2,890 2,550 521 582 247 150 2,283 2,025 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 1,485 1,233 1,251 1,149 990 869 232 268 r 29 12 r 685 677 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,469 1,107 1,352 908 1,117 708 185 187 50 13 914 517 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 3,703 2,958 3,529 2,655 2,953 2,085 415 463 161 107 2,176 1,133

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 1,604 1,503 1,594 1,462 1,106 1,040 477 388 11 34 409 322

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 171 i 87 i 78 i 88 i 76 i 53 i 1 i 14 i 1 i 21 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 170: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 2 FELONY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS AND SENTENCING ON FELONY GUILTY PLEAS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING SENTENCINGTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED ON PLEAS OF

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS GUILTY

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 251,575 245,587 r 233,645 229,815 r 160,792 156,075 r 48,732 49,650 r 24,121 24,090 r 27,948 27,805 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 12,909 12,175 10,058 11,126 7,807 8,865 2,063 2,215 188 46 2,899 3,861DESERT MUNICIPAL 2,682 3,046 2,503 2,447 2,284 2,089 216 356 3 2 101 8 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 1,391 1,223 1,334 1,161 975 858 309 259 50 44 378 593 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 2,201 1,931 855 1,922 634 1,666 221 256 0 0 431 1,015 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 6,635 5,975 5,366 5,596 3,914 4,252 1,317 1,344 135 0 1,989 2,245

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 10,784 10,812 10,199 10,256 8,387 8,235 1,812 2,021 0 0 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 10,782 10,812 10,197 10,256 8,385 8,235 1,812 2,021 0 0 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 432 409 290 276 196 178 0 0 94 98 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 14,814 13,768 14,527 12,739 10,945 9,084 3,077 3,261 505 394 837 1,056

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 17,892 17,675 17,233 17,262 12,345 12,274 4,878 4,983 10 5 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 2,137 1,859 2,086 1,871 1,410 1,287 676 584 0 0 0 0 67 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 3,847 3,768 3,607 3,606 2,272 2,167 1,334 1,438 1 1 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 8,517 8,784 8,109 8,522 5,595 5,837 2,507 2,681 7 4 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 3,391 3,264 3,431 3,263 3,068 2,983 361 280 2 0 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 8,115 7,669 7,121 5,995 5,244 4,123 1,664 1,687 213 185 577 190SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 8,051 7,540 7,076 5,878 5,199 4,006 1,664 1,687 213 185 523 74 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 64 129 45 117 45 117 0 0 0 0 54 116

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 4,914 4,775 4,650 4,961 3,400 3,360 1,198 1,513 52 88 2,115 2,142LODI MUNICIPAL 711 678 595 615 380 451 215 164 0 0 219 269 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 1,091 1,072 899 921 686 624 184 253 29 44 276 123 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 3,105 3,015 3,151 3,415 2,329 2,275 799 1,096 23 44 1,620 1,750 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 7 10 5 10 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 1,213 1,168 1,051 1,108 800 815 233 241 18 52 154 180

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 2,847 2,731 2,601 2,519 1,705 1,704 836 760 60 55 17 19

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 2,163 2,245 1,799 1,993 1,459 1,605 304 369 36 19 658 662NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 966 816 761 765 605 590 154 169 2 6 275 195 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,197 1,429 1,038 1,228 854 1,015 150 200 34 13 383 467

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 12,010 11,544 9,668 9,345 r 6,835 6,717 2,813 2,574 r 20 54 r 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 2,445 2,153 1,860 1,564 1,375 1,107 477 455 8 2 702 662

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 171: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 2 FELONY FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS AND SENTENCING ON FELONY GUILTY PLEAS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER HEARING SENTENCINGTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED ON PLEAS OF

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE HEARING MATTERS MATTERS GUILTY

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 251,575 245,587 r 233,645 229,815 r 160,792 156,075 r 48,732 49,650 r 24,121 24,090 r 27,948 27,805 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 2,171 2,013 r 2,130 2,131 r 1,398 1,387 r 700 724 r 32 20 533 381 r

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 42 25 30 26 13 11 2 3 15 12 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 629 573 401 407 229 271 69 66 103 70 152 136

SOLANO COUNTY 3,750 3,380 3,601 2,910 2,714 2,203 813 624 74 83 974 714NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 2,141 1,923 2,205 1,679 1,665 1,320 502 318 38 41 492 378 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 1,609 1,457 1,396 1,231 1,049 883 311 306 36 42 482 336

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 3,160 2,661 2,955 2,847 1,958 1,878 997 968 0 1 663 791

STANISLAUS COUNTY 5,181 4,739 4,869 5,238 r 4,019 4,237 r 699 808 r 151 193 r 1,099 1,306 r

1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 5,181 4,739 3,300 3,441 2,704 2,741 596 694 0 6 994 1,030 68 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 1,569 1,797 r 1,315 1,496 r 103 114 r 151 187 r 105 276 rSUTTER COUNTY

SUTTER MUNICIPAL 1,339 1,228 1,363 1,256 1,065 995 54 51 244 210 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 657 690 609 674 480 533 129 141 0 0 0 0

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 238 168 264 296 108 142 122 148 34 6 25 30

TULARE COUNTY 3,891 3,607 r 3,274 3,173 r 2,575 2,533 r 498 420 r 201 220 r 1,708 2,044 rTULARE MUNICIPAL 3,891 3,607 r 3,274 3,173 r 2,575 2,533 r 498 420 r 201 220 r 1,708 2,044 rTULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 453 432 422 399 262 263 160 127 0 9 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 2,571 2,374 2,510 2,301 1,756 1,184 648 1,062 106 55 0 4

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 2,555 2,464 1,711 1,272 1,548 1,154 120 76 43 42 460 449

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 1,121 1,068 902 741 582 500 315 227 5 14 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 172: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF FELONIES AND FELONIES REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARINGPLEAS OF GUILTY ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED OR BOUND OVER

DISMISSALS AND REDUCED TO REDUCED TO REDUCED TO TRANSFERS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 36,356 35,970 r 101,753 97,707 r 22,683 22,398 r 1,528 1,676 r 128 78 r 70,742 71,545 r 455 441 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 1,771 1,806 3,953 3,938 r 1,187 1,086 r 63 115 r 0 0 r 1,730 1,453 2 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 63 74 170 192 97 83 0 0 0 0 38 29 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 87 101 221 272 r 18 43 r 8 12 r 0 0 r 70 132 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 121 206 534 547 193 225 2 1 0 0 177 136 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 86 95 212 162 61 78 5 6 0 0 119 84 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 886 819 2,214 2,222 766 561 47 93 0 0 1,021 912 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 528 511 602 543 52 96 1 3 0 0 305 160 2 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 2 2 11 19 6 5 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 2

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 158 112 174 120 0 0 5 2 0 0 96 73 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 139 226 242 512 146 127 1 11 0 0 236 496 1 1

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 3 56 7 216 23 98 1 3 0 0 2 61 0 0 69 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 136 170 235 296 123 29 0 8 0 0 234 435 1 1

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 30 26 53 16 35 38 1 3 2 2 36 83 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 53 63 86 75 1 4 1 1 0 0 35 31 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 494 472 2,206 1,998 682 591 22 7 4 0 1,884 1,657 15 17BAY MUNICIPAL 221 258 150 157 224 208 17 3 3 0 770 680 1 2 DELTA MUNICIPAL 81 54 146 134 50 50 5 4 0 0 414 444 8 10 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 101 91 92 96 148 64 0 0 0 0 353 306 0 0 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 20 15 11 17 13 21 0 0 1 0 92 95 1 1 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 71 54 1,807 1,594 247 248 0 0 0 0 255 132 5 4

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 63 170 246 343 80 67 27 27 0 0 234 214 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 140 157 r 508 318 r 138 91 r 1 2 r 0 0 128 224 r 1 1

FRESNO COUNTY 1,513 1,672 4,343 4,045 1,972 2,110 92 76 6 10 1,618 1,740 82 97CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 295 337 924 862 408 524 40 25 1 3 418 370 32 29 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 1,218 1,335 3,419 3,183 1,564 1,586 52 51 5 7 1,200 1,370 50 68

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 46 60 100 127 17 13 8 5 0 0 48 51 1 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 97 111 215 324 44 96 19 8 55 0 279 221 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 173: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF FELONIES AND FELONIES REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARINGPLEAS OF GUILTY ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED OR BOUND OVER

DISMISSALS AND REDUCED TO REDUCED TO REDUCED TO TRANSFERS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 36,356 35,970 r 101,753 97,707 r 22,683 22,398 r 1,528 1,676 r 128 78 r 70,742 71,545 r 455 441 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 349 474 601 562 318 389 16 7 0 0 144 259 2 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 51 41 116 119 3 14 0 3 0 0 32 20 0 0

KERN COUNTY 885 1,085 1,764 2,261 717 844 81 30 4 6 2,514 2,273 3 4BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 562 736 1,319 1,688 363 387 38 0 0 2 1,586 1,448 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 118 130 204 271 77 103 21 7 0 0 308 289 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 153 156 138 151 176 223 2 1 0 0 317 276 2 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 52 63 103 151 101 131 20 22 4 4 303 260 1 4

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 98 81 96 27 154 142 73 86 3 1 561 520 86 57

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 50 90 99 130 48 82 0 3 2 0 86 177 1 0

1 LASSEN COUNTY70 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 70 70 154 126 41 9 7 4 3 0 55 62 1 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 11,541 11,813 20,548 20,878 2,385 2,606 0 0 4 4 28,634 29,949 10 12ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 109 91 126 251 69 81 0 0 0 0 346 292 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 224 275 1,115 1,051 229 317 0 0 0 1 608 548 0 2 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 91 88 91 115 25 26 0 0 0 0 357 286 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 41 57 136 124 17 20 0 0 0 0 249 303 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 185 240 489 492 88 86 0 0 0 0 970 1,176 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 1,003 1,112 1,633 2,054 504 543 0 0 1 0 1,783 2,012 1 1 CULVER MUNICIPAL 178 131 190 215 145 102 0 0 0 0 362 324 0 1 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 82 67 108 107 31 27 0 0 0 0 777 785 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 206 204 245 346 35 33 0 0 0 0 825 709 1 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 145 196 312 300 29 57 0 0 0 0 427 531 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 480 481 911 830 66 138 0 0 0 1 1,211 1,466 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 346 239 1,916 1,911 46 70 0 0 1 1 936 1,146 0 1 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 6,589 6,786 8,324 8,263 534 464 0 0 0 1 14,087 14,257 2 5 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 140 99 259 97 33 6 0 0 0 0 540 744 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 81 61 149 172 35 57 0 0 0 0 43 45 3 2 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 82 79 414 362 30 52 0 0 0 0 325 309 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 307 284 839 767 92 147 0 0 0 0 475 555 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 177 190 563 582 35 29 0 0 0 0 640 665 1 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 232 262 512 606 60 74 0 0 0 0 890 1,122 1 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 83 90 261 190 73 68 0 0 0 0 273 303 1 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 75 94 307 358 15 17 0 0 2 0 209 246 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 174: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF FELONIES AND FELONIES REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARINGPLEAS OF GUILTY ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED OR BOUND OVER

DISMISSALS AND REDUCED TO REDUCED TO REDUCED TO TRANSFERS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 36,356 35,970 r 101,753 97,707 r 22,683 22,398 r 1,528 1,676 r 128 78 r 70,742 71,545 r 455 441 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 204 219 976 933 49 67 0 0 0 0 527 533 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 370 367 355 404 67 60 0 0 0 0 1,033 931 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 111 101 317 348 78 65 0 0 0 0 741 661 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 296 401 317 384 554 542 177 148 2 2 493 381 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 270 283 393 349 272 178 30 23 13 18 283 176 19 1

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 8 31 0 6 2 0 4 4 0 0 68 102 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 260 287 237 331 218 178 6 6 1 0 185 203 1 2

MERCED COUNTY

1 MERCED MUNICIPAL 537 497 625 586 593 586 3 2 1 3 422 309 0 0 71 MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 48 36 29 41 12 12 1 1 0 0 31 39 1 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 35 42 55 28 24 62 10 0 0 0 52 61 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 221 221 963 902 257 259 17 100 0 1 774 793 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 221 221 963 902 257 259 17 100 0 1 774 793 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 410 138 306 410 89 91 0 0 0 0 79 247 0 0

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 25 20 157 202 56 32 2 0 0 0 411 293 0 2

ORANGE COUNTY 1,905 1,563 9,493 7,416 699 727 32 9 4 0 3,277 2,763 12 23CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 768 704 3,281 2,702 98 88 7 0 2 0 1,474 1,012 2 1 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 468 327 2,305 2,025 117 198 0 2 1 0 764 730 3 0 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 57 92 813 703 120 74 0 2 0 0 261 278 0 0 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 122 100 914 517 81 91 9 0 0 0 226 178 0 22 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 490 340 2,180 1,469 283 276 16 5 1 0 552 565 7 0

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 184 295 739 515 183 230 58 6 0 1 430 415 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 41 i 12 i 35 i 41 i 0 i 0 i 1 i 1 i 0 i 0 i 1 i 34 i 0 i 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 175: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF FELONIES AND FELONIES REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARINGPLEAS OF GUILTY ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED OR BOUND OVER

DISMISSALS AND REDUCED TO REDUCED TO REDUCED TO TRANSFERS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 36,356 35,970 r 101,753 97,707 r 22,683 22,398 r 1,528 1,676 r 128 78 r 70,742 71,545 r 455 441 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 788 999 5,682 6,104 1,337 1,762 70 76 0 0 2,144 2,180 37 5DESERT MUNICIPAL 299 228 1,514 1,584 471 277 34 20 0 0 184 338 1 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 44 96 824 677 107 85 9 11 0 0 346 291 4 1 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 60 152 499 1,145 75 369 3 5 0 0 186 247 32 4 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 385 523 2,845 2,698 684 1,031 24 40 0 0 1,428 1,304 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 2,320 2,511 5,511 5,182 556 542 55 161 0 0 1,756 1,859 1 1SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 2,318 2,511 5,511 5,182 556 542 55 161 0 0 1,756 1,859 1 1 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 9 0 187 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 98 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 1,604 1,495 7,741 5,954 1,600 1,635 159 160 1 1 3,393 3,428 29 66

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 1,192 1,036 10,163 10,302 990 936 34 59 0 2 4,845 4,922 9 5

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 135 141 1,122 1,023 153 123 0 0 0 0 674 584 2 0 72 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 265 229 1,753 1,614 254 324 0 1 0 0 1,333 1,434 2 4 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 614 502 4,480 4,892 501 443 34 58 0 2 2,476 2,624 4 1 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 178 164 2,808 2,773 82 46 0 0 0 0 362 280 1 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 1,429 997 2,307 2,137 1,508 989 77 148 0 0 1,800 1,724 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 1,426 995 2,265 2,022 1,508 989 77 148 0 0 1,800 1,724 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 3 2 42 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 901 801 2,306 2,349 193 210 14 22 0 2 1,236 1,575 0 2LODI MUNICIPAL 92 120 238 286 50 45 0 0 0 0 215 164 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 266 193 339 315 81 116 7 10 0 2 206 283 0 2 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 538 479 1,729 1,747 62 49 7 12 0 0 815 1,128 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 5 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 225 193 514 445 61 177 1 6 0 0 249 287 1 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 346 342 1,283 1,278 76 84 11 10 0 0 878 803 7 2

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 247 248 1,119 1,236 93 121 0 0 0 0 340 379 0 9NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 106 97 444 443 55 50 0 0 0 0 156 166 0 9 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 141 151 675 793 38 71 0 0 0 0 184 213 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 897 742 5,211 5,332 727 643 77 81 0 1 2,756 2,541 r 0 5

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 489 397 871 689 15 21 2 1 0 0 483 456 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 176: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 3 DISPOSITIONS OF FELONIES AND FELONIES REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

BEFORE HEARING AFTER HEARINGPLEAS OF GUILTY ACQUITTED OR DISMISSED CONVICTED OR BOUND OVER

DISMISSALS AND REDUCED TO REDUCED TO REDUCED TO TRANSFERS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS FELONIES MISDEMEANORS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 36,356 35,970 r 101,753 97,707 r 22,683 22,398 r 1,528 1,676 r 128 78 r 70,742 71,545 r 455 441 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 336 375 r 731 672 331 340 r 0 1 1 1 721 742 r 10 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 2 2 6 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 17 15 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 76 99 0 11 153 161 38 8 0 0 134 128 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 805 738 1,314 1,199 595 266 38 46 2 0 843 657 4 4NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 446 462 740 674 479 184 38 46 2 0 496 309 4 4 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 359 276 574 525 116 82 0 0 0 0 347 348 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 371 469 1,016 844 571 565 37 23 12 9 904 898 44 39

STANISLAUS COUNTY 904 764 r 2,150 2,506 r 965 967 r 28 44 r 4 9 r 807 917 r 11 31 rSTANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 778 654 1,083 1,277 843 810 0 0 0 1 596 699 0 0

1 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 126 110 r 1,067 1,229 r 122 157 r 28 44 r 4 8 r 211 218 r 11 31 r73 SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 218 165 433 430 414 400 19 25 0 0 279 236 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 158 191 134 88 188 254 0 13 0 0 129 128 0 0

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 16 34 46 70 46 38 10 11 0 5 101 104 45 34

TULARE COUNTY 282 241 r 1,835 1,857 r 458 435 r 35 23 r 3 0 642 604 r 19 13TULARE MUNICIPAL 282 241 r 1,835 1,857 r 458 435 r 35 23 r 3 0 642 604 r 19 13 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 49 36 172 196 41 31 0 0 0 0 160 136 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 252 252 1,497 922 7 10 33 21 1 0 720 1,096 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 478 313 573 501 497 340 21 36 0 0 142 76 0 6

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 172 173 87 71 323 256 11 11 0 0 309 230 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 177: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 847,853 862,654 r 767,470 788,186 r 743,992 764,041 r 13,703 14,191 r 8,875 9,236 r 900 718 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 34,342 35,485 32,222 33,047 r 31,587 32,353 250 291 r 384 402 1 1ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 2,117 2,488 2,123 2,375 2,028 2,307 36 28 59 39 0 1 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 5,528 6,274 4,946 5,114 r 4,854 5,005 27 37 r 65 72 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 5,047 5,170 5,003 5,312 4,943 5,255 25 14 34 43 1 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 2,916 2,927 2,743 2,921 2,616 2,757 85 116 42 48 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 12,719 12,891 11,513 11,100 11,361 10,947 26 50 126 103 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 6,015 5,735 5,894 6,225 5,785 6,082 51 46 58 97 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 215 253 151 148 146 140 5 8 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 903 903 914 871 890 857 4 3 20 11 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 5,353 5,734 4,706 5,192 4,427 4,991 32 25 83 140 164 36NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 3,155 3,564 2,705 3,180 2,539 3,062 22 17 61 101 83 0

1 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2,198 2,170 2,001 2,012 1,888 1,929 10 8 22 39 81 36 74 CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 1,027 1,134 850 952 772 874 34 10 44 68 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 961 865 828 806 817 802 1 1 10 3 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 16,710 15,668 13,947 13,166 13,439 12,714 55 36 223 252 230 164BAY MUNICIPAL 4,315 4,332 3,765 3,690 3,673 3,572 4 5 23 35 65 78 DELTA MUNICIPAL 4,339 3,782 3,364 3,222 3,275 3,140 7 8 58 66 24 8 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 5,377 5,000 4,195 3,991 4,079 3,897 15 5 40 56 61 33 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 2,679 2,554 2,365 2,003 2,170 1,849 20 14 95 95 80 45 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 258 260 242 256 9 4 7 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 636 693 1,610 1,114 1,598 1,098 4 7 6 9 2 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 3,268 3,173 r 3,108 3,433 r 2,864 3,192 r 35 8 r 54 42 r 155 191 r

FRESNO COUNTY 15,860 15,204 13,215 14,954 13,076 14,783 70 62 69 109 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 5,089 5,312 4,449 4,850 4,350 4,754 66 54 33 42 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 10,771 9,892 8,766 10,104 8,726 10,029 4 8 36 67 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 610 498 432 464 366 453 24 2 42 9 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 5,824 5,099 4,272 3,849 4,158 3,777 57 39 57 33 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 178: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 847,853 862,654 r 767,470 788,186 r 743,992 764,041 r 13,703 14,191 r 8,875 9,236 r 900 718 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 3,450 3,934 2,472 2,767 r 2,459 2,736 r 8 27 r 5 4 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 635 604 559 514 558 509 1 2 0 3 0 0

KERN COUNTY 21,013 21,748 25,977 26,477 25,586 26,066 102 84 289 327 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 12,951 12,947 15,649 15,593 15,442 15,422 29 0 178 171 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 3,401 3,394 5,170 3,873 5,106 3,821 30 28 34 24 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 2,532 2,744 2,332 2,886 2,315 2,853 9 18 8 15 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 2,129 2,663 2,826 4,125 2,723 3,970 34 38 69 117 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 2,618 2,582 2,988 2,317 2,750 2,102 178 159 60 56 0 0

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 1,680 1,911 1,236 1,849 1,202 1,800 22 16 12 33 0 0

1 LASSEN COUNTY75 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 417 412 399 431 381 403 2 2 16 26 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 247,073 250,586 221,225 214,881 219,109 213,020 186 175 1,929 1,686 1 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 2,053 2,566 2,214 2,536 2,192 2,518 0 0 22 18 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 4,620 4,489 5,141 4,556 5,098 4,519 0 0 43 37 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 2,299 2,304 2,511 1,982 2,423 1,923 24 27 64 32 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 2,448 2,943 2,459 2,753 2,423 2,738 0 0 36 15 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 8,835 10,130 10,179 9,653 10,054 9,529 0 0 125 124 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 16,064 16,387 12,651 10,733 12,517 10,638 50 31 83 64 1 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 1,423 1,428 1,370 1,398 1,341 1,374 5 2 24 22 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 8,253 7,687 8,219 7,001 8,168 6,940 1 1 50 60 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 4,372 4,001 3,965 3,544 3,929 3,491 0 0 36 53 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 2,883 3,628 3,108 3,299 3,054 3,250 0 1 54 48 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 9,053 9,549 8,782 8,459 8,747 8,422 0 0 35 37 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 23,192 25,155 22,834 23,147 22,677 23,018 63 84 94 45 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 101,107 95,201 77,736 71,173 77,055 70,618 0 0 681 555 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 3,535 3,527 3,186 3,345 3,159 3,320 5 7 22 18 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 3,091 2,658 2,961 2,038 2,933 2,018 6 0 22 20 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 2,099 2,500 2,071 2,282 2,019 2,254 0 0 52 28 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 3,701 4,710 4,383 4,408 4,374 4,392 0 0 9 16 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 4,915 5,371 5,847 6,853 5,759 6,784 0 2 88 67 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 4,341 5,008 4,380 4,791 4,331 4,730 0 0 49 61 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 6,228 8,958 6,821 10,183 6,770 10,111 0 0 51 72 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 4,354 4,894 4,156 4,898 4,120 4,857 0 0 36 41 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 179: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 847,853 862,654 r 767,470 788,186 r 743,992 764,041 r 13,703 14,191 r 8,875 9,236 r 900 718 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 10,014 10,123 9,176 9,383 9,090 9,295 4 3 82 85 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 11,498 11,220 10,463 8,905 10,332 8,826 28 10 103 69 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 6,695 6,149 6,612 7,561 6,544 7,455 0 7 68 99 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 4,558 4,693 4,060 4,267 3,595 3,809 330 294 135 164 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 5,015 4,802 4,472 4,004 4,222 3,813 69 59 181 132 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 460 595 495 477 482 467 5 1 8 9 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 2,573 2,851 r 2,729 2,646 2,649 2,594 23 8 57 44 0 0

MERCED COUNTY

1 MERCED MUNICIPAL 5,548 5,667 4,755 5,284 4,719 5,253 10 8 26 22 0 1 76 MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 552 330 221 270 210 267 0 0 11 3 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 681 738 690 757 668 712 8 23 14 22 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 10,503 10,256 9,359 8,820 9,133 8,627 28 17 198 176 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 10,503 10,256 9,359 8,820 9,133 8,627 28 17 198 176 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 2,396 2,391 r 2,314 2,012 r 2,262 1,954 6 25 12 22 r 34 11

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 2,342 2,155 1,736 1,356 1,549 1,302 2 1 39 53 146 0

ORANGE COUNTY 61,357 65,644 64,750 63,624 64,104 62,732 74 77 470 552 102 263CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 15,376 14,819 20,588 13,896 20,522 13,840 4 2 61 53 1 1 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 14,337 17,069 12,915 15,230 12,793 15,087 9 24 113 118 0 1 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 11,088 11,467 12,138 13,243 11,911 12,832 18 10 154 207 55 194 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 8,460 10,344 7,861 8,490 7,769 8,383 13 10 45 57 34 40 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 12,096 11,945 11,248 12,765 11,109 12,590 30 31 97 117 12 27

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 5,862 5,827 4,847 5,190 4,711 5,017 34 33 102 140 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 729 i 523 i 391 i 454 i 360 i 443 i 12 i 2 i 19 i 9 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 180: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 847,853 862,654 r 767,470 788,186 r 743,992 764,041 r 13,703 14,191 r 8,875 9,236 r 900 718 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 29,273 29,863 r 23,125 24,472 r 22,558 23,547 r 239 647 r 328 278 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 8,449 8,963 7,280 6,512 6,947 6,310 62 0 271 202 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 3,800 4,231 r 3,192 4,394 3,156 4,370 22 19 14 5 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 5,149 5,482 3,207 4,343 3,172 4,295 30 39 5 9 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 11,875 11,187 9,446 9,223 r 9,283 8,572 r 125 589 r 38 62 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 32,750 32,318 28,790 29,986 28,363 29,472 386 465 41 49 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 31,574 31,070 27,784 28,858 27,398 28,651 371 185 15 22 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 1,176 1,248 1,006 1,128 965 821 15 280 26 27 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 872 911 1,136 1,123 1,111 1,119 16 2 9 2 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 40,189 38,762 31,384 31,277 29,751 30,129 1,415 950 218 191 0 7

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 67,054 73,410 59,635 64,152 58,152 62,718 403 310 1,080 1,124 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 7,033 7,726 6,940 7,528 6,798 7,365 73 92 69 71 0 0 77 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 14,003 13,988 10,648 9,690 10,016 9,148 255 205 377 337 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 36,401 41,890 33,882 35,726 33,428 35,231 71 13 383 482 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 9,617 9,806 8,165 11,208 7,910 10,974 4 0 251 234 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 35,001 39,357 28,100 51,087 18,661 40,402 8,809 9,327 630 1,358 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 35,001 39,357 28,100 51,087 18,661 40,402 8,809 9,327 630 1,358 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 15,822 15,810 14,231 15,755 14,040 15,511 21 35 170 208 0 1LODI MUNICIPAL 1,870 1,895 1,524 1,779 1,506 1,760 3 2 15 17 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 3,583 3,960 3,207 3,995 3,156 3,884 5 18 46 92 0 1 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 9,239 9,162 8,745 9,353 8,623 9,241 13 15 109 97 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 1,130 793 755 628 755 626 0 0 0 2 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 8,772 9,168 8,287 8,447 8,185 8,355 3 3 99 89 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 8,794 8,758 8,466 8,050 8,352 7,937 56 30 58 83 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 17,902 17,255 15,489 14,568 15,230 14,290 96 222 163 56 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 5,563 6,363 5,337 5,630 5,286 5,583 22 16 29 31 0 0 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 12,339 10,892 10,152 8,938 9,944 8,707 74 206 134 25 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 44,281 43,377 37,529 37,995 37,124 37,588 129 107 276 300 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 7,871 6,736 7,591 6,329 7,228 6,139 46 62 317 127 0 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 181: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 847,853 862,654 r 767,470 788,186 r 743,992 764,041 r 13,703 14,191 r 8,875 9,236 r 900 718 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 6,413 6,803 r 6,100 6,524 r 6,022 6,463 r 18 19 60 42 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 247 229 182 160 178 153 1 1 3 6 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 1,526 1,457 1,299 1,251 1,239 1,129 36 100 24 22 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 11,962 10,321 11,775 10,365 11,623 10,228 30 23 122 114 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 6,999 5,723 7,083 6,669 7,059 6,644 0 6 24 19 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 4,963 4,598 4,692 3,696 4,564 3,584 30 17 98 95 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 11,143 9,625 10,778 10,610 10,704 10,522 56 77 18 11 0 0

STANISLAUS COUNTY 9,119 9,628 9,643 9,890 r 9,556 9,764 r 19 26 68 100 r 0 0STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 9,119 9,628 9,024 9,716 8,973 9,605 0 22 51 89 0 0

1 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 619 174 r 583 159 r 19 4 17 11 r 0 0 78 SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 1,977 1,890 1,763 1,637 1,714 1,586 15 12 34 39 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 1,904 2,088 1,727 1,835 1,636 1,773 4 1 23 19 64 42

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 255 327 375 319 305 190 60 107 9 22 1 0

TULARE COUNTY 8,238 8,882 r 7,403 7,058 r 7,139 6,889 r 69 46 195 123 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 8,238 8,882 r 7,403 7,058 r 7,139 6,889 r 69 46 195 123 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 1,274 1,535 1,391 1,563 1,323 1,520 2 0 66 43 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 13,986 14,210 12,881 13,319 12,562 13,034 53 34 266 251 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 3,338 4,578 4,973 2,627 4,905 2,546 50 76 18 5 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 2,719 2,398 1,487 1,394 1,482 1,377 0 4 5 13 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 182: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 5 GROUP A NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 508,255 520,090 r 480,059 484,114 r 474,420 478,370 r 1,561 1,758 r 3,970 3,918 r 108 68 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 19,954 19,999 19,690 20,889 r 19,540 20,710 30 54 r 119 124 1 1ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 1,291 1,489 1,371 1,580 1,345 1,554 12 12 14 13 0 1 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 1,985 2,103 1,992 2,165 r 1,975 2,145 4 8 r 13 12 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 4,316 4,306 4,119 4,459 4,107 4,435 1 1 10 23 1 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 1,608 1,531 1,527 1,672 1,515 1,666 1 4 11 2 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 6,406 6,324 6,189 6,254 6,143 6,218 1 10 45 26 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 4,348 4,246 4,492 4,759 4,455 4,692 11 19 26 48 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 56 101 51 71 51 67 0 4 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 544 573 579 569 565 562 2 1 12 6 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 2,881 3,119 2,772 2,918 2,729 2,868 7 5 17 28 19 17

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,501 1,534 1,271 1,424 1,251 1,402 6 1 14 21 0 0 79 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,380 1,585 1,501 1,494 1,478 1,466 1 4 3 7 19 17

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 631 682 534 555 523 546 1 3 10 6 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 688 657 577 609 572 606 0 1 5 2 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 11,230 10,333 9,493 8,279 9,350 8,133 21 14 87 127 35 5BAY MUNICIPAL 3,137 3,061 3,006 2,364 2,976 2,325 4 5 23 34 3 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 2,771 2,542 2,186 2,241 2,158 2,207 0 0 27 34 1 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 3,901 3,426 2,953 2,514 2,915 2,480 1 1 16 33 21 0 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 1,421 1,304 1,091 910 1,060 875 7 4 14 26 10 5 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 257 250 241 246 9 4 7 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 495 449 1,226 819 1,217 803 4 7 5 9 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 1,988 1,952 r 1,846 1,934 r 1,804 1,902 r 9 1 26 22 r 7 9 r

FRESNO COUNTY 12,508 12,079 10,523 12,427 10,464 12,353 17 19 42 55 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 2,948 3,173 2,855 3,258 2,815 3,219 15 13 25 26 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 9,560 8,906 7,668 9,169 7,649 9,134 2 6 17 29 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 406 357 270 389 245 380 14 2 11 7 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 2,855 2,874 2,120 2,402 2,059 2,368 22 17 39 17 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 183: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 5 GROUP A NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 508,255 520,090 r 480,059 484,114 r 474,420 478,370 r 1,561 1,758 r 3,970 3,918 r 108 68 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 2,365 2,851 1,617 1,810 r 1,607 1,783 r 5 25 r 5 2 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 355 293 281 238 281 234 0 1 0 3 0 0

KERN COUNTY 14,174 14,307 13,219 13,413 13,039 13,288 82 73 98 52 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 8,800 8,809 8,185 8,032 8,092 7,999 23 0 70 33 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 2,238 2,163 2,089 1,943 2,053 1,918 26 24 10 1 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 1,834 1,842 1,719 1,936 1,706 1,916 9 13 4 7 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 1,302 1,493 1,226 1,502 1,188 1,455 24 36 14 11 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 2,209 2,142 2,482 1,868 2,291 1,703 137 114 54 51 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

1 LAKE MUNICIPAL 1,157 1,294 845 1,227 825 1,208 12 6 8 13 0 0 80 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 209 268 210 291 197 267 2 1 11 23 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 153,953 161,264 150,528 146,492 149,074 145,226 9 7 1,445 1,259 0 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 1,706 2,115 1,894 2,075 1,874 2,062 0 0 20 13 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 3,774 3,411 4,169 3,578 4,131 3,550 0 0 38 28 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 1,544 1,540 1,664 1,402 1,637 1,380 0 0 27 22 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 1,407 1,780 1,514 1,682 1,499 1,677 0 0 15 5 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 7,494 8,432 8,435 7,955 8,320 7,835 0 0 115 120 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 4,642 5,593 4,971 5,444 4,920 5,414 0 0 51 30 0 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 1,014 1,013 1,005 1,080 988 1,073 0 0 17 7 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 6,706 6,311 6,706 5,718 6,658 5,665 0 0 48 53 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 3,034 3,276 2,932 2,959 2,902 2,909 0 0 30 50 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 2,581 3,194 2,781 2,921 2,730 2,880 0 0 51 41 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 6,888 7,118 6,675 6,445 6,641 6,415 0 0 34 30 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 11,014 12,477 13,626 14,963 13,574 14,926 1 0 51 37 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 65,611 65,995 55,476 51,612 54,888 51,137 0 0 588 475 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 3,092 3,220 2,845 3,094 2,825 3,076 1 1 19 17 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 907 902 982 781 974 772 2 0 6 9 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 1,583 1,768 1,591 1,699 1,567 1,680 0 0 24 19 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 3,083 3,765 3,664 3,598 3,656 3,583 0 0 8 15 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 3,600 3,735 4,649 5,470 4,583 5,428 0 2 66 40 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 3,272 3,764 3,334 3,629 3,297 3,582 0 0 37 47 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 1,752 2,082 1,913 2,204 1,902 2,195 0 0 11 9 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 2,206 2,334 2,334 2,389 2,313 2,363 0 0 21 26 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 184: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 5 GROUP A NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 508,255 520,090 r 480,059 484,114 r 474,420 478,370 r 1,561 1,758 r 3,970 3,918 r 108 68 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 5,980 6,274 6,005 6,065 5,932 5,986 0 0 73 79 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 5,691 6,548 6,492 5,675 6,431 5,635 5 4 56 36 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 5,372 4,617 4,871 4,054 4,832 4,003 0 0 39 51 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 2,169 2,221 1,993 1,946 1,729 1,626 213 217 51 103 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 2,232 2,299 2,136 2,082 2,068 2,039 25 13 43 30 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 302 455 411 392 406 385 2 1 3 6 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 1,544 1,617 r 1,597 1,523 1,577 1,509 3 0 17 14 0 0

1 MERCED COUNTY81 MERCED MUNICIPAL 4,066 4,158 3,359 3,859 3,337 3,838 3 4 19 16 0 1

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 446 246 175 219 165 216 0 0 10 3 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 259 278 273 274 256 247 6 16 11 11 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 5,781 6,638 5,892 5,851 5,772 5,739 7 10 113 102 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 5,781 6,638 5,892 5,851 5,772 5,739 7 10 113 102 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 1,430 1,490 r 1,476 1,461 r 1,449 1,432 4 7 9 20 r 14 2

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 1,313 1,141 786 660 751 638 0 1 21 21 14 0

ORANGE COUNTY 39,192 42,018 42,902 42,910 42,527 42,480 50 41 312 360 13 29CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9,389 9,749 13,982 10,019 13,941 9,975 2 2 39 42 0 0 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 10,837 12,823 10,073 11,580 9,955 11,449 6 15 112 116 0 0 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 5,831 6,287 6,108 6,702 6,040 6,611 7 4 55 74 6 13 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 4,792 5,245 4,905 5,251 4,850 5,190 13 8 42 53 0 0 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 8,343 7,914 7,834 9,358 7,741 9,255 22 12 64 75 7 16

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 3,815 3,773 3,409 3,447 3,353 3,390 10 2 46 55 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 373 i 425 i 157 i 399 i 149 i 390 i 6 i 1 i 2 i 8 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 185: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 5 GROUP A NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 508,255 520,090 r 480,059 484,114 r 474,420 478,370 r 1,561 1,758 r 3,970 3,918 r 108 68 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 17,183 18,964 15,396 16,986 r 15,182 16,363 149 551 65 72 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 3,846 4,404 3,876 3,814 3,848 3,790 3 0 25 24 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 2,585 3,279 2,379 3,879 2,352 3,860 14 15 13 4 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 2,953 3,054 1,737 2,589 1,720 2,565 13 17 4 7 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 7,799 8,227 7,404 6,704 r 7,262 6,148 119 519 23 37 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 15,982 14,366 12,873 14,055 12,648 13,968 213 68 12 19 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 15,595 13,937 12,564 13,664 12,340 13,591 213 54 11 19 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 387 429 309 391 308 377 0 14 1 0 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 606 596 857 823 832 820 16 2 9 1 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 27,159 27,156 21,543 23,499 21,411 23,387 74 35 58 76 0 1

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 36,700 36,434 36,631 38,372 36,194 37,891 61 66 376 415 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 5,005 4,729 5,278 5,377 5,224 5,324 5 7 49 46 0 0 82 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 8,857 8,366 7,076 6,765 6,867 6,541 50 59 159 165 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 17,633 18,259 18,924 20,724 18,806 20,568 2 0 116 156 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 5,205 5,080 5,353 5,506 5,297 5,458 4 0 52 48 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 8,137 7,109 6,014 5,645 5,952 5,618 15 3 47 24 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 8,137 7,109 6,014 5,645 5,952 5,618 15 3 47 24 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 9,928 10,472 9,043 9,728 8,974 9,651 2 6 67 70 0 1LODI MUNICIPAL 1,653 1,676 1,353 1,552 1,340 1,545 2 0 11 7 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 1,850 2,080 1,628 2,067 1,614 2,041 0 5 14 20 0 1 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 6,080 6,352 5,809 5,831 5,767 5,788 0 1 42 42 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 345 364 253 278 253 277 0 0 0 1 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 5,432 5,757 4,763 4,870 4,721 4,825 2 1 40 44 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 7,403 7,010 6,868 6,367 6,794 6,300 42 17 32 50 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 8,679 9,578 7,634 8,246 7,575 8,200 9 13 50 33 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 3,897 4,820 3,471 3,949 3,451 3,935 5 6 15 8 0 0 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 4,782 4,758 4,163 4,297 4,124 4,265 4 7 35 25 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 22,039 23,485 20,238 21,139 20,158 21,071 23 2 57 66 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 4,893 4,151 4,592 4,147 4,557 4,089 12 37 23 20 0 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 186: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 5 GROUP A NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 508,255 520,090 r 480,059 484,114 r 474,420 478,370 r 1,561 1,758 r 3,970 3,918 r 108 68 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 4,145 4,362 r 3,597 4,182 r 3,567 4,148 r 5 14 25 20 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 174 169 116 101 114 97 1 1 1 3 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 812 810 679 642 653 628 10 4 16 10 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 8,333 7,654 8,145 6,708 8,060 6,610 5 11 80 87 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 4,559 4,154 4,311 3,777 4,299 3,756 0 4 12 17 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 3,774 3,500 3,834 2,931 3,761 2,854 5 7 68 70 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 8,318 7,370 7,988 7,702 7,935 7,635 41 56 12 11 0 0

STANISLAUS COUNTY 7,016 7,367 7,393 7,377 r 7,324 7,258 r 13 25 56 94 r 0 0

1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 7,016 7,367 6,862 7,240 6,823 7,136 0 21 39 83 0 0 83 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 531 137 r 501 122 r 13 4 17 11 r 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 1,216 1,227 1,220 1,225 1,209 1,201 0 6 11 18 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 1,287 1,458 1,114 1,244 1,104 1,233 2 0 4 10 4 1

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 134 197 214 169 159 85 50 79 4 5 1 0

TULARE COUNTY 6,180 6,233 r 5,652 5,180 r 5,465 5,060 r 44 30 143 90 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 6,180 6,233 r 5,652 5,180 r 5,465 5,060 r 44 30 143 90 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 755 818 828 752 794 728 2 0 32 24 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 9,051 9,759 8,655 9,673 8,549 9,569 27 15 79 89 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 2,789 3,163 3,278 1,869 3,220 1,817 40 47 18 5 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 2,324 2,072 1,299 1,190 1,297 1,182 0 1 2 7 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 187: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 6 GROUP B NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 142,825 141,424 r 119,349 109,769 r 117,113 107,929 r 1,132 906 r 976 788 r 128 146 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 4,515 5,001 3,793 3,947 3,755 3,875 17 29 21 43 0 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 73 99 79 115 76 109 2 3 1 3 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 1,156 1,625 932 1,207 918 1,189 6 7 8 11 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 197 200 309 273 308 273 0 0 1 0 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 261 399 287 406 280 385 5 12 2 9 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 2,659 2,595 2,011 1,758 2,000 1,734 2 7 9 17 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 169 83 175 188 173 185 2 0 0 3 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 153 135 91 70 87 66 4 4 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 62 133 65 128 64 127 1 0 0 1 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 473 334 290 208 265 191 2 1 3 10 20 6

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 243 228 186 127 184 119 0 1 1 7 1 0 84 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 230 106 104 81 81 72 2 0 2 3 19 6

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 129 105 140 119 113 89 6 5 21 25 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 187 173 159 160 159 160 0 0 0 0 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 430 952 1,142 1,091 1,084 1,053 8 6 35 22 15 10BAY MUNICIPAL 56 166 121 218 121 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 248 380 792 512 757 482 4 6 20 20 11 4 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 109 359 196 306 184 299 4 0 4 1 4 6 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 17 47 33 46 22 45 0 0 11 1 0 0 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 114 198 329 229 328 229 0 0 1 0 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 726 751 r 723 1,021 r 687 956 r 4 2 9 4 r 23 59 r

FRESNO COUNTY 1,911 1,801 1,416 1,329 1,373 1,289 32 28 11 12 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 1,262 1,312 935 920 897 882 32 28 6 10 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 649 489 481 409 476 407 0 0 5 2 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 138 80 111 66 76 65 6 0 29 1 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,311 632 744 583 714 574 21 5 9 4 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 188: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 6 GROUP B NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 142,825 141,424 r 119,349 109,769 r 117,113 107,929 r 1,132 906 r 976 788 r 128 146 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 1,085 1,063 847 943 844 939 r 3 2 r 0 2 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 239 268 244 230 243 229 1 1 0 0 0 0

KERN COUNTY 3,130 3,724 3,088 3,268 3,062 3,240 12 7 14 21 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 1,369 1,472 1,506 1,165 1,500 1,163 6 0 0 2 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 635 626 678 638 674 633 2 0 2 5 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 600 839 492 854 490 846 0 5 2 3 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 526 787 412 611 398 598 4 2 10 11 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 265 277 236 192 233 185 3 6 0 1 0 0

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 268 375 236 433 229 411 3 8 4 14 0 0

1 LASSEN COUNTY85 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 98 75 94 68 92 66 0 0 2 2 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 58,156 50,805 42,289 34,626 41,936 34,407 73 26 280 193 0 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 186 358 199 343 198 342 0 0 1 1 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 499 601 499 487 496 485 0 0 3 2 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 339 401 426 284 424 282 1 1 1 1 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 1,001 1,050 853 955 832 946 0 0 21 9 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 1,118 1,637 1,501 1,423 1,494 1,419 0 0 7 4 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 895 1,633 1,086 1,303 1,080 1,300 0 0 6 3 0 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 332 385 296 287 287 272 4 2 5 13 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 1,446 1,238 1,444 1,152 1,441 1,145 1 0 2 7 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 1,276 706 957 519 951 516 0 0 6 3 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 271 337 284 283 283 280 0 0 1 3 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 2,118 2,162 1,978 1,813 1,977 1,806 0 0 1 7 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 8,697 7,257 6,134 3,414 6,069 3,403 33 9 32 2 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 24,888 18,662 14,143 11,254 14,072 11,197 0 0 71 57 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 421 286 330 236 323 229 4 6 3 1 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 2,174 1,744 1,974 1,249 1,954 1,238 4 0 16 11 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 249 337 253 287 240 283 0 0 13 4 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 613 929 704 784 703 783 0 0 1 1 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 639 567 585 526 572 519 0 0 13 7 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 869 1,018 862 742 855 731 0 0 7 11 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 234 293 282 302 280 299 0 0 2 3 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 1,639 1,785 1,331 1,436 1,318 1,426 0 0 13 10 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 189: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 6 GROUP B NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 142,825 141,424 r 119,349 109,769 r 117,113 107,929 r 1,132 906 r 976 788 r 128 146 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 2,122 2,598 1,994 2,253 1,984 2,245 4 3 6 5 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 5,290 4,333 3,578 2,995 3,516 2,964 22 5 40 26 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 840 488 596 299 587 297 0 0 9 2 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 1,853 1,957 1,697 1,991 1,546 1,895 88 64 63 32 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 821 888 746 598 726 598 2 0 18 0 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 89 70 49 45 47 44 2 0 0 1 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 745 822 r 852 741 803 712 20 6 29 23 0 0

1 MERCED COUNTY86 MERCED MUNICIPAL 1,455 1,457 1,375 1,405 1,365 1,396 4 3 6 6 0 0

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 106 84 46 51 45 51 0 0 1 0 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 117 108 114 130 113 120 1 5 0 5 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 2,355 1,784 1,852 1,693 1,846 1,682 2 2 4 9 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 2,355 1,784 1,852 1,693 1,846 1,682 2 2 4 9 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 465 440 r 398 314 387 303 1 8 3 2 7 1

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 491 515 470 369 466 366 0 0 4 3 0 0

ORANGE COUNTY 13,596 15,033 14,650 12,673 14,582 12,581 8 5 46 57 14 30CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 4,918 4,749 5,891 3,610 5,875 3,601 1 0 14 8 1 1 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 2,803 3,316 2,190 2,564 2,189 2,563 1 1 0 0 0 0 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 1,385 1,552 2,464 2,525 2,435 2,463 2 2 23 37 4 23 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,738 3,302 1,820 2,290 1,815 2,287 0 1 1 0 4 2 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 2,752 2,114 2,285 1,684 2,268 1,667 4 1 8 12 5 4

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 865 860 715 661 691 640 4 5 20 16 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 27 i 0 i 23 i 0 i 23 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 190: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 6 GROUP B NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 142,825 141,424 r 119,349 109,769 r 117,113 107,929 r 1,132 906 r 976 788 r 128 146 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 4,942 5,461 2,807 3,249 r 2,753 3,185 21 53 r 33 11 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 2,070 2,240 1,484 1,227 1,453 1,218 0 0 31 9 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 404 508 219 276 215 275 3 1 1 0 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 1,452 1,720 914 1,110 899 1,098 14 12 1 0 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 1,016 993 190 636 r 186 594 4 40 r 0 2 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 1,585 1,647 1,646 1,734 1,574 1,388 43 316 29 30 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 796 828 949 997 917 944 28 50 4 3 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 789 819 697 737 657 444 15 266 25 27 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 212 250 237 248 237 248 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 6,210 5,457 5,275 3,974 4,617 3,771 612 170 46 33 0 0

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 10,371 13,766 7,208 6,864 7,122 6,780 44 30 42 54 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 420 615 344 473 331 458 10 9 3 6 0 0 87 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 988 1,488 791 592 742 546 31 21 18 25 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 8,724 11,454 5,878 5,591 5,858 5,572 3 0 17 19 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 239 209 195 208 191 204 0 0 4 4 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 91 118 97 118 95 118 2 0 0 0 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 91 118 97 118 95 118 2 0 0 0 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 1,561 1,419 1,911 2,881 1,887 2,856 3 6 21 19 0 0LODI MUNICIPAL 131 147 102 159 100 153 0 2 2 4 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 264 330 266 549 261 543 1 0 4 6 0 0 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 745 692 1,273 1,918 1,256 1,905 2 4 15 9 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 421 250 270 255 270 255 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 2,135 2,061 2,211 2,331 2,198 2,310 0 0 13 21 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 256 359 304 363 302 362 1 0 1 1 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 826 801 965 843 956 843 6 0 3 0 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 653 689 819 701 811 701 5 0 3 0 0 0 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 173 112 146 142 145 142 1 0 0 0 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 8,736 8,081 7,426 8,158 7,377 8,100 12 19 37 39 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 190 150 266 203 261 202 3 0 2 1 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 191: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 6 GROUP B NONTRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 142,825 141,424 r 119,349 109,769 r 117,113 107,929 r 1,132 906 r 976 788 r 128 146 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 971 1,786 r 969 1,351 r 967 1,339 r 0 3 2 9 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 62 49 48 42 47 42 0 0 1 0 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 459 176 350 134 346 128 0 3 4 3 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 926 1,095 915 600 898 596 1 0 16 4 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 812 930 724 462 713 462 0 0 11 0 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 114 165 191 138 185 134 1 0 5 4 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 1,725 1,591 1,878 1,971 1,862 1,956 10 15 6 0 0 0

STANISLAUS COUNTY 537 735 622 887 r 610 885 r 6 1 6 1 0 0

1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 537 735 550 867 544 865 0 1 6 1 0 0 88 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 72 20 r 66 20 r 6 0 0 0 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 450 367 341 233 320 216 8 2 13 15 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 420 499 412 447 360 405 2 0 1 2 49 40

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 83 118 132 137 121 97 9 26 2 14 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 1,687 2,099 r 1,363 1,364 r 1,312 1,344 r 10 8 41 12 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 1,687 2,099 r 1,363 1,364 r 1,312 1,344 r 10 8 41 12 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 191 428 224 512 205 504 0 0 19 8 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 1,189 1,057 1,109 937 1,103 934 1 1 5 2 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 386 801 1,501 723 1,491 698 10 25 0 0 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 249 153 108 83 108 83 0 0 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 192: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 7 NONTRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 196,773 201,140 r 168,062 194,303 r 152,459 177,742 r 11,010 11,527 r 3,929 4,530 r 664 504 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 9,873 10,485 8,739 8,211 8,292 7,768 203 208 244 235 0 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 753 900 673 680 607 644 22 13 44 23 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 2,387 2,546 2,022 1,742 1,961 1,671 17 22 44 49 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 534 664 575 580 528 547 24 13 23 20 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 1,047 997 929 843 821 706 79 100 29 37 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 3,654 3,972 3,313 3,088 3,218 2,995 23 33 72 60 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 1,498 1,406 1,227 1,278 1,157 1,205 38 27 32 46 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 6 17 9 7 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 297 197 270 174 261 168 1 2 8 4 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 1,999 2,281 1,644 2,066 1,433 1,932 23 19 63 102 125 13

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,411 1,802 1,248 1,629 1,104 1,541 16 15 46 73 82 0 89 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 588 479 396 437 329 391 7 4 17 29 43 13

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 267 347 176 278 136 239 27 2 13 37 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 86 35 92 37 86 36 1 0 5 1 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 5,050 4,383 3,312 3,796 3,005 3,528 26 16 101 103 180 149BAY MUNICIPAL 1,122 1,105 638 1,108 576 1,029 0 0 0 1 62 78 DELTA MUNICIPAL 1,320 860 386 469 360 451 3 2 11 12 12 4 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 1,367 1,215 1,046 1,171 980 1,118 10 4 20 22 36 27 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 1,241 1,203 1,241 1,047 1,088 929 13 10 70 68 70 40 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 27 46 55 66 53 66 0 0 0 0 2 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 554 470 r 539 478 r 373 334 r 22 5 r 19 16 r 125 123 r

FRESNO COUNTY 1,441 1,324 1,276 1,198 1,239 1,141 21 15 16 42 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 879 827 659 672 638 653 19 13 2 6 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 562 497 617 526 601 488 2 2 14 36 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 66 61 51 9 45 8 4 0 2 1 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,658 1,593 1,408 864 1,385 835 14 17 9 12 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 193: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 7 NONTRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 196,773 201,140 r 168,062 194,303 r 152,459 177,742 r 11,010 11,527 r 3,929 4,530 r 664 504 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 0 20 8 14 8 14 r 0 0 r 0 0 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 41 43 34 46 34 46 0 0 0 0 0 0

KERN COUNTY 3,709 3,717 9,670 9,796 9,485 9,538 8 4 177 254 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 2,782 2,666 5,958 6,396 5,850 6,260 0 0 108 136 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 528 605 2,403 1,292 2,379 1,270 2 4 22 18 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 98 63 121 96 119 91 0 0 2 5 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 301 383 1,188 2,012 1,137 1,917 6 0 45 95 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 144 163 270 257 226 214 38 39 6 4 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

1 LAKE MUNICIPAL 255 242 155 189 148 181 7 2 0 6 0 0 90 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 110 69 95 72 92 70 0 1 3 1 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 34,964 38,517 28,408 33,763 28,099 33,387 104 142 204 234 1 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 161 93 121 118 120 114 0 0 1 4 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 347 477 473 491 471 484 0 0 2 7 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 416 363 421 296 362 261 23 26 36 9 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 40 113 92 116 92 115 0 0 0 1 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 223 61 243 275 240 275 0 0 3 0 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 10,527 9,161 6,594 3,986 6,517 3,924 50 31 26 31 1 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 77 30 69 31 66 29 1 0 2 2 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 101 138 69 131 69 130 0 1 0 0 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 62 19 76 66 76 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 31 97 43 95 41 90 0 1 2 4 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 47 269 129 201 129 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 3,481 5,421 3,074 4,770 3,034 4,689 29 75 11 6 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 10,608 10,544 8,117 8,307 8,095 8,284 0 0 22 23 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 22 21 11 15 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 10 12 5 8 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 267 395 227 296 212 291 0 0 15 5 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 5 16 15 26 15 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 676 1,069 613 857 604 837 0 0 9 20 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 200 226 184 420 179 417 0 0 5 3 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 4,242 6,583 4,626 7,677 4,588 7,617 0 0 38 60 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 509 775 491 1,073 489 1,068 0 0 2 5 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 194: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 7 NONTRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 196,773 201,140 r 168,062 194,303 r 152,459 177,742 r 11,010 11,527 r 3,929 4,530 r 664 504 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 1,912 1,251 1,177 1,065 1,174 1,064 0 0 3 1 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 517 339 393 235 385 227 1 1 7 7 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 483 1,044 1,145 3,208 1,125 3,155 0 7 20 46 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 536 515 370 330 320 288 29 13 21 29 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 1,962 1,615 1,590 1,324 1,428 1,176 42 46 120 102 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 69 70 35 40 29 38 1 0 5 2 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 284 412 r 280 382 269 373 0 2 11 7 0 0

1 MERCED COUNTY91 MERCED MUNICIPAL 27 52 21 20 17 19 3 1 1 0 0 0

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 305 352 303 353 299 345 1 2 3 6 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 2,367 1,834 1,615 1,276 1,515 1,206 19 5 81 65 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 2,367 1,834 1,615 1,276 1,515 1,206 19 5 81 65 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 501 461 r 440 237 426 219 1 10 0 0 13 8

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 538 499 480 327 332 298 2 0 14 29 132 0

ORANGE COUNTY 8,569 8,593 7,198 8,041 6,995 7,671 16 31 112 135 75 204CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,069 321 715 267 706 264 1 0 8 3 0 0 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 697 930 652 1,086 649 1,075 2 8 1 2 0 1 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 3,872 3,628 3,566 4,016 3,436 3,758 9 4 76 96 45 158 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,930 1,797 1,136 949 1,104 906 0 1 2 4 30 38 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,001 1,917 1,129 1,723 1,100 1,668 4 18 25 30 0 7

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 1,182 1,194 723 1,082 667 987 20 26 36 69 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 329 i 98 i 211 i 55 i 188 i 53 i 6 i 1 i 17 i 1 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 195: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 7 NONTRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 196,773 201,140 r 168,062 194,303 r 152,459 177,742 r 11,010 11,527 r 3,929 4,530 r 664 504 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 7,148 5,438 r 4,922 4,237 r 4,623 3,999 r 69 43 r 230 195 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 2,533 2,319 1,920 1,471 1,646 1,302 59 0 215 169 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 811 444 r 594 239 589 235 5 3 0 1 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 744 708 556 644 553 632 3 10 0 2 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 3,060 1,967 1,852 1,883 r 1,835 1,830 r 2 30 r 15 23 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 15,183 16,305 14,271 14,197 14,141 14,116 130 81 0 0 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 15,183 16,305 14,271 14,197 14,141 14,116 130 81 0 0 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 54 65 42 52 42 51 0 0 0 1 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 6,820 6,149 4,566 3,804 3,723 2,971 729 745 114 82 0 6

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 19,983 23,210 15,796 18,916 14,836 18,047 298 214 662 655 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 1,608 2,382 1,318 1,678 1,243 1,583 58 76 17 19 0 0 92 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 4,158 4,134 2,781 2,333 2,407 2,061 174 125 200 147 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 10,044 12,177 9,080 9,411 8,764 9,091 66 13 250 307 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 4,173 4,517 2,617 5,494 2,422 5,312 0 0 195 182 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 26,773 32,130 21,989 45,324 12,614 34,666 8,792 9,324 583 1,334 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 26,773 32,130 21,989 45,324 12,614 34,666 8,792 9,324 583 1,334 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 4,333 3,919 3,277 3,146 3,179 3,004 16 23 82 119 0 0LODI MUNICIPAL 86 72 69 68 66 62 1 0 2 6 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 1,469 1,550 1,313 1,379 1,281 1,300 4 13 28 66 0 0 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 2,414 2,118 1,663 1,604 1,600 1,548 11 10 52 46 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 364 179 232 95 232 94 0 0 0 1 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 1,205 1,350 1,313 1,246 1,266 1,220 1 2 46 24 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 1,135 1,389 1,294 1,320 1,256 1,275 13 13 25 32 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 8,397 6,876 6,890 5,479 6,699 5,247 81 209 110 23 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,013 854 1,047 980 1,024 947 12 10 11 23 0 0 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 7,384 6,022 5,843 4,499 5,675 4,300 69 199 99 0 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 13,506 11,811 9,865 8,698 9,589 8,417 94 86 182 195 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 2,788 2,435 2,733 1,979 2,410 1,848 31 25 292 106 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 196: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 7 NONTRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 196,773 201,140 r 168,062 194,303 r 152,459 177,742 r 11,010 11,527 r 3,929 4,530 r 664 504 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 1,297 655 r 1,534 991 r 1,488 976 r 13 2 33 13 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 11 11 18 17 17 14 0 0 1 3 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 255 471 270 475 240 373 26 93 4 9 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 2,703 1,572 2,715 3,057 2,665 3,022 24 12 26 23 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 1,628 639 2,048 2,430 2,047 2,426 0 2 1 2 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 1,075 933 667 627 618 596 24 10 25 21 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 1,100 664 912 937 907 931 5 6 0 0 0 0

STANISLAUS COUNTY 1,566 1,526 1,628 1,626 r 1,622 1,621 r 0 0 6 5 0 0

1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 1,566 1,526 1,612 1,609 1,606 1,604 0 0 6 5 0 0 93 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 16 17 r 16 17 r 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 311 296 202 179 185 169 7 4 10 6 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 197 131 201 144 172 135 0 1 18 7 11 1

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 38 12 29 13 25 8 1 2 3 3 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 371 550 r 388 514 r 362 485 r 15 8 11 21 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 371 550 r 388 514 r 362 485 r 15 8 11 21 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 328 289 339 299 324 288 0 0 15 11 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 3,746 3,394 3,117 2,709 2,910 2,531 25 18 182 160 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 163 614 194 35 194 31 0 4 0 0 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 146 173 80 121 77 112 0 3 3 6 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 197: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 8 SUMMARY OF NONPARKING TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 5,618,938 5,786,280 r 5,538,621 5,672,987 r 5,259,584 5,394,371 r 124,577 111,538 r 139,694 139,557 r 14,766 27,521 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 255,566 257,153 245,515 257,530 r 234,167 241,367 5,190 8,944 6,156 7,219 r 2 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 16,160 18,370 15,596 15,137 14,477 13,921 300 322 819 894 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 24,256 23,793 22,072 21,919 r 21,319 21,045 190 365 563 509 r 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 46,878 51,557 45,411 51,744 42,898 48,632 1,007 1,104 1,506 2,008 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 39,626 35,699 36,313 37,595 34,134 32,035 1,471 4,914 706 646 2 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 70,153 70,779 67,129 66,619 65,103 64,087 510 553 1,516 1,979 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 58,493 56,955 58,994 64,516 56,236 61,647 1,712 1,686 1,046 1,183 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 2,342 1,929 1,397 1,251 1,354 1,213 42 38 1 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 9,212 9,850 4,999 7,332 4,992 7,317 0 7 7 8 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 29,712 28,708 25,402 26,068 24,005 25,061 151 85 563 568 683 354

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 21,189 20,402 17,882 17,713 17,112 17,232 110 57 457 423 203 1 94 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 8,523 8,306 7,520 8,355 6,893 7,829 41 28 106 145 480 353

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 6,438 8,186 6,406 7,221 6,080 6,993 54 35 272 193 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 8,423 9,526 7,179 8,665 7,076 8,553 26 22 77 90 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 137,132 134,790 138,187 132,186 123,879 118,603 2,557 2,225 8,863 9,105 2,888 2,253BAY MUNICIPAL 43,838 41,498 43,214 39,706 37,829 34,655 1,392 1,252 3,379 3,073 614 726 DELTA MUNICIPAL 28,088 26,098 27,180 25,774 24,348 23,449 273 440 1,613 1,354 946 531 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 30,786 30,461 31,408 30,679 28,921 28,476 313 276 1,543 1,390 631 537 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 34,420 36,733 36,331 35,964 32,729 31,960 578 257 2,327 3,288 697 459 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 54 63 52 63 1 0 1 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 4,976 6,354 7,956 7,022 7,473 6,508 31 5 163 215 289 294

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 22,917 24,128 r 19,991 24,245 r 18,234 22,280 r 326 183 r 817 1,160 r 614 622 r

FRESNO COUNTY 112,031 107,921 97,714 95,402 95,799 93,338 610 533 1,305 1,531 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 40,575 41,422 36,549 35,629 35,951 35,059 526 486 72 84 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 71,456 66,499 61,165 59,773 59,848 58,279 84 47 1,233 1,447 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 8,453 9,542 6,514 8,229 6,330 7,933 56 91 128 205 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 18,929 21,224 17,580 20,342 16,683 19,604 567 304 323 432 7 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 198: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 8 SUMMARY OF NONPARKING TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 5,618,938 5,786,280 r 5,538,621 5,672,987 r 5,259,584 5,394,371 r 124,577 111,538 r 139,694 139,557 r 14,766 27,521 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 42,073 46,895 33,730 31,504 32,861 30,586 r 328 338 r 541 562 0 18

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 15,262 16,053 14,690 15,768 14,358 15,336 1 5 331 427 0 0

KERN COUNTY 125,478 124,021 110,658 104,628 105,343 99,324 240 198 4,919 4,632 156 474BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 49,559 45,671 41,401 37,599 40,142 36,458 7 0 1,252 1,141 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 28,488 30,270 25,852 27,329 25,533 26,940 43 67 276 304 0 18 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 13,991 13,380 11,184 10,354 10,849 9,915 31 36 304 403 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 33,440 34,700 32,221 29,346 28,819 26,011 159 95 3,087 2,784 156 456

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 23,494 22,208 23,490 25,138 22,182 24,714 1,201 118 107 306 0 0

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 8,131 8,882 7,488 9,379 5,520 6,692 1,858 2,541 110 146 0 0

1 LASSEN COUNTY95 LASSEN MUNICIPAL 7,614 10,960 7,422 8,997 6,999 8,621 149 93 274 283 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1,721,984 1,719,870 1,739,341 1,702,273 r 1,680,548 1,647,426 14,487 16,551 44,304 38,291 r 2 5ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 48,872 53,003 48,786 54,765 47,154 52,933 8 6 1,624 1,826 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 41,632 45,059 43,507 47,139 42,851 46,255 0 2 656 882 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 25,213 25,399 24,724 25,929 23,784 24,195 370 1,257 570 477 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 22,313 24,753 21,856 24,975 21,194 24,366 107 113 555 496 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 87,819 91,640 85,830 95,168 82,802 91,053 1,524 2,227 1,504 1,888 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 66,393 71,529 67,230 70,732 64,719 68,406 1,653 1,455 857 871 1 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 27,041 26,737 25,359 24,139 24,538 23,105 106 91 715 943 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 43,366 39,453 43,208 37,258 r 41,492 35,757 725 709 991 792 r 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 44,019 47,998 52,042 52,280 50,457 50,459 576 810 1,009 1,011 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 39,813 41,244 40,720 43,790 38,331 41,290 1,215 1,194 1,174 1,306 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 43,724 41,657 42,004 38,816 40,245 37,162 3 0 1,756 1,654 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 95,247 89,836 89,286 90,265 84,982 86,778 2,832 3,077 1,472 410 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 654,811 650,493 697,335 650,340 678,767 635,703 0 0 18,568 14,637 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 27,456 27,077 25,411 28,021 24,041 26,712 704 677 666 632 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 41,698 35,685 39,976 34,547 38,462 33,777 1 4 1,513 766 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 65,579 65,226 62,236 63,828 60,788 62,325 23 23 1,424 1,479 1 1 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 36,713 43,409 37,983 41,367 35,635 38,920 713 1,256 1,635 1,187 0 4 POMONA MUNICIPAL 62,610 70,922 59,315 65,799 57,929 64,053 2 2 1,384 1,744 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 43,948 37,104 40,549 34,945 38,762 33,340 882 1,043 905 562 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 18,256 16,183 18,486 16,813 18,108 16,388 2 5 376 420 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 26,934 24,577 23,891 22,984 23,057 22,158 0 0 834 826 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 199: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 8 SUMMARY OF NONPARKING TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 5,618,938 5,786,280 r 5,538,621 5,672,987 r 5,259,584 5,394,371 r 124,577 111,538 r 139,694 139,557 r 14,766 27,521 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 74,768 69,986 75,937 65,127 72,109 61,577 2,170 2,176 1,658 1,374 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 52,338 50,010 43,240 45,230 41,232 43,761 870 304 1,138 1,165 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 31,421 30,890 30,430 28,016 29,109 26,953 1 120 1,320 943 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 19,858 21,199 15,761 16,305 15,084 15,529 121 81 321 419 235 276

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 46,009 43,917 46,412 47,951 42,417 44,230 962 932 3,033 2,789 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 1,615 2,068 1,044 1,344 1,001 1,292 9 1 25 26 9 25

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 14,420 15,423 r 13,921 14,279 13,383 13,818 83 95 454 365 1 1

1 MERCED COUNTY96 MERCED MUNICIPAL 46,201 47,548 43,239 43,928 41,973 42,918 253 203 1,013 806 0 1

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 2,534 2,307 2,063 1,962 2,001 1,927 4 6 58 29 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 3,935 5,637 4,389 5,428 4,309 5,235 36 102 44 91 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 68,675 68,164 66,229 59,211 63,787 56,695 837 639 1,605 1,877 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 68,675 68,164 66,229 59,211 63,787 56,695 837 639 1,605 1,877 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 17,992 13,648 r 16,910 13,486 r 15,696 12,287 119 211 420 262 r 675 726

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 15,718 18,934 r 13,263 17,750 12,172 16,441 19 56 418 492 654 761

ORANGE COUNTY 483,092 502,704 526,704 547,249 512,485 516,391 1,868 2,299 9,011 11,486 3,340 17,073CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 84,301 87,287 106,569 141,695 105,066 138,085 83 87 949 1,183 471 2,340 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 149,585 155,247 169,412 140,932 165,039 131,577 739 1,265 3,118 4,358 516 3,732 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 67,394 74,055 74,258 85,240 71,502 79,407 108 72 1,931 2,493 717 3,268 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 87,610 86,626 86,292 85,915 83,690 80,531 234 219 1,741 1,726 627 3,439 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 94,202 99,489 90,173 93,467 87,188 86,791 704 656 1,272 1,726 1,009 4,294

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 47,981 47,566 46,763 46,462 44,632 44,249 732 758 1,399 1,434 0 21

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 2,516 i 1,540 i 2,084 i 1,468 i 1,951 i 1,415 i 113 i 10 i 19 i 34 i 1 i 9 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 200: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 8 SUMMARY OF NONPARKING TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 5,618,938 5,786,280 r 5,538,621 5,672,987 r 5,259,584 5,394,371 r 124,577 111,538 r 139,694 139,557 r 14,766 27,521 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 235,006 264,593 r 230,525 241,032 r 225,759 235,931 r 894 813 r 3,872 4,288 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 62,468 69,902 64,949 62,422 63,095 60,746 192 23 1,662 1,653 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 46,026 48,048 r 45,004 48,780 44,600 48,302 350 338 54 140 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 32,192 30,932 31,157 30,634 30,671 30,193 330 332 156 109 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 94,320 115,711 r 89,415 99,196 r 87,393 96,690 r 22 120 r 2,000 2,386 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 137,570 158,374 121,703 130,436 r 116,788 124,181 4,642 5,933 273 322 r 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 129,924 149,475 114,142 122,314 109,564 116,791 4,565 5,499 13 24 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 7,646 8,899 7,561 8,122 r 7,224 7,390 77 434 260 298 r 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 6,479 7,542 5,734 5,729 5,621 5,539 24 16 89 174 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 278,735 288,964 294,542 270,781 r 250,658 245,032 36,843 18,508 r 6,494 6,365 r 547 876

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 404,302 437,084 400,119 421,907 377,248 401,042 9,250 6,906 13,621 13,959 0 0

1 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 72,578 69,626 68,805 65,980 64,988 61,687 2,708 3,170 1,109 1,123 0 0 97 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 118,548 138,054 115,435 124,110 108,020 116,066 3,501 3,438 3,914 4,606 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 157,840 164,752 161,551 169,508 152,450 163,289 3,036 297 6,065 5,922 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 55,336 64,652 54,328 62,309 51,790 60,000 5 1 2,533 2,308 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 100,114 111,629 106,400 142,750 73,630 108,525 30,753 31,329 2,017 2,896 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 100,114 111,629 106,400 142,750 73,630 108,525 30,753 31,329 2,017 2,896 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 94,392 103,104 86,916 124,296 r 84,502 121,521 r 479 413 1,934 2,356 r 1 6LODI MUNICIPAL 16,611 18,428 14,717 14,053 r 14,306 13,548 r 134 90 277 415 r 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 25,201 27,417 22,204 41,909 r 21,443 40,911 93 89 667 906 r 1 3 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 48,156 52,730 46,652 64,863 45,411 63,595 251 234 990 1,034 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 4,424 4,529 3,343 3,471 3,342 3,467 1 0 0 1 0 3

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 50,885 56,434 52,411 52,509 51,169 51,145 472 333 770 1,031 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 127,304 130,638 r 114,125 122,909 110,222 118,226 1,560 1,959 2,343 2,719 0 5

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 72,801 76,771 70,190 73,394 68,289 70,491 504 1,547 1,397 1,348 0 8NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 37,058 36,262 40,127 40,863 39,125 39,789 130 177 872 889 0 8 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 35,743 40,509 30,063 32,531 29,164 30,702 374 1,370 525 459 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 265,000 263,785 258,418 305,007 250,143 297,064 1,936 1,406 6,339 6,537 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 39,487 42,025 38,108 38,985 36,313 37,303 196 158 1,460 1,437 139 87

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 201: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 8 SUMMARY OF NONPARKING TRAFFIC MISDEMEANORS AND INFRACTIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 5,618,938 5,786,280 r 5,538,621 5,672,987 r 5,259,584 5,394,371 r 124,577 111,538 r 139,694 139,557 r 14,766 27,521 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 25,351 27,383 r 32,377 28,362 r 31,584 27,365 r 162 407 r 631 590 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 647 643 634 642 621 633 0 0 13 9 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 17,531 16,714 13,172 13,392 12,004 12,037 442 682 726 673 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 75,699 75,349 72,224 74,925 69,652 72,668 810 589 1,762 1,668 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 54,984 55,486 53,685 55,906 52,513 54,819 339 232 833 855 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 20,715 19,863 18,539 19,019 17,139 17,849 471 357 929 813 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 59,860 61,281 57,394 62,059 52,157 57,533 31 347 975 919 4,231 3,260

STANISLAUS COUNTY 56,841 57,546 55,320 53,158 r 52,244 50,987 r 1,291 945 1,785 1,226 r 0 0

1 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 56,841 57,546 55,142 53,131 52,081 50,967 1,285 943 1,776 1,221 0 0 98 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 178 27 r 163 20 r 6 2 9 5 r 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 12,619 13,810 10,727 11,876 10,100 10,981 258 322 369 573 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 13,281 12,575 12,657 12,130 12,021 11,474 58 77 286 221 292 358

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 3,137 2,995 2,358 2,156 2,234 1,944 90 182 34 30 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 54,332 61,611 r 52,956 46,808 r 51,380 45,835 r 218 129 r 1,358 844 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 54,332 61,611 r 52,956 46,808 r 51,380 45,835 r 218 129 r 1,358 844 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 6,443 6,919 5,781 6,387 5,596 6,184 50 39 135 161 0 3

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 109,385 107,645 102,140 98,797 98,821 95,354 297 325 3,022 3,118 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 29,609 28,595 19,797 13,944 18,842 13,323 190 326 765 295 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 11,415 13,416 7,452 8,613 7,212 8,157 97 138 143 315 0 3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 202: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 9 GROUP C TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 198,602 213,526 r 185,146 189,600 r 182,762 187,203 r 585 508 r 1,792 1,883 r 7 6

ALAMEDA COUNTY 5,710 5,833 6,270 6,292 6,229 6,234 4 15 35 43 2 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 373 312 317 316 317 316 0 0 0 0 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 240 250 258 261 255 253 0 6 3 2 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 1,226 1,174 1,350 1,301 1,344 1,296 1 0 5 5 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 840 895 924 871 921 866 0 1 1 4 2 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 1,334 1,368 1,112 1,298 1,098 1,282 0 8 14 8 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 1,697 1,834 2,309 2,245 2,294 2,221 3 0 12 24 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 33 69 36 32 35 31 0 1 1 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 182 206 185 189 179 185 0 0 6 4 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 1,336 1,396 1,157 1,153 1,137 1,133 8 1 8 18 4 1

1 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 989 977 834 782 823 766 3 1 5 15 3 0 99 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 347 419 323 371 314 367 5 0 3 3 1 1

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 235 333 186 210 184 206 0 3 2 1 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 294 325 215 248 213 242 0 1 2 5 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 4,628 4,740 4,088 3,651 4,014 3,537 2 1 72 113 0 0BAY MUNICIPAL 1,306 1,431 1,467 1,010 1,436 974 1 1 30 35 0 0 DELTA MUNICIPAL 1,051 1,073 890 874 880 857 0 0 10 17 0 0 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 1,152 1,044 855 831 848 822 1 0 6 9 0 0 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 1,119 1,192 861 917 836 865 0 0 25 52 0 0 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 15 19 14 19 0 0 1 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 266 324 1,131 696 1,124 691 0 2 7 3 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 983 1,129 r 1,140 1,132 r 1,096 1,122 r 36 3 r 8 6 r 0 1

FRESNO COUNTY 6,683 6,616 4,688 4,833 4,649 4,791 3 3 36 39 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 2,201 2,357 1,499 1,501 1,478 1,490 3 1 18 10 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 4,482 4,259 3,189 3,332 3,171 3,301 0 2 18 29 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 364 347 238 255 231 252 1 0 6 3 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,770 1,433 1,191 925 1,154 910 20 5 17 10 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 203: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 9 GROUP C TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 198,602 213,526 r 185,146 189,600 r 182,762 187,203 r 585 508 r 1,792 1,883 r 7 6

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 1,567 1,701 1,042 1,087 1,033 1,081 r 4 3 r 5 3 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 264 286 257 297 257 295 0 1 0 1 0 0

KERN COUNTY 4,684 5,606 4,250 4,831 4,219 4,800 9 3 22 28 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 2,358 2,983 2,096 2,598 2,069 2,574 7 0 20 24 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 883 1,019 839 900 837 896 0 2 2 2 0 0 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 771 852 648 659 648 659 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 672 752 667 674 665 671 2 1 0 2 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 1,093 1,044 1,433 950 1,388 932 29 14 16 4 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 584 703 443 742 441 738 0 1 2 3 0 0 00 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 192 264 193 225 183 215 3 2 7 8 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 49,276 53,225 45,995 48,740 45,511 48,267 1 0 483 473 0 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 1,099 1,204 1,064 1,157 1,055 1,148 0 0 9 9 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 1,129 1,177 1,021 1,118 1,009 1,102 0 0 12 16 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 395 451 375 418 360 396 0 0 15 22 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 583 725 600 633 597 630 0 0 3 3 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 2,879 3,211 2,854 2,978 2,814 2,942 0 0 40 36 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 2,208 2,528 1,969 2,066 1,945 2,043 0 0 24 23 0 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 423 311 374 282 370 281 0 0 4 1 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 1,031 959 884 918 867 898 0 0 17 20 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 1,886 1,988 1,703 1,753 1,690 1,744 0 0 13 9 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 815 936 837 799 827 785 0 0 10 14 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 1,448 1,642 1,256 1,525 1,248 1,517 0 0 8 8 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 2,019 2,532 1,676 2,427 1,659 2,396 0 0 17 31 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 19,764 21,229 18,437 19,474 18,269 19,341 0 0 168 133 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 696 816 619 757 610 747 0 0 9 10 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 473 448 428 425 419 420 0 0 9 5 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 1,449 1,425 1,438 1,283 1,422 1,261 1 0 15 22 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 1,131 1,251 1,156 1,275 1,151 1,268 0 0 5 7 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 1,268 1,440 1,242 1,393 1,218 1,378 0 0 24 15 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 1,710 2,080 1,581 1,847 1,563 1,822 0 0 18 25 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 634 579 594 544 593 541 0 0 1 3 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 586 559 567 516 558 510 0 0 9 6 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 204: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 9 GROUP C TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 198,602 213,526 r 185,146 189,600 r 182,762 187,203 r 585 508 r 1,792 1,883 r 7 6

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 2,376 2,271 2,241 2,124 2,224 2,102 0 0 17 22 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 1,944 2,120 1,801 1,833 1,781 1,816 0 0 20 17 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 1,330 1,343 1,278 1,195 1,262 1,179 0 0 16 16 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 1,020 1,182 930 1,011 916 1,000 11 7 3 4 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 1,432 1,409 1,318 1,447 1,256 1,394 21 12 41 41 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 43 64 65 65 64 65 0 0 1 0 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 849 948 r 881 878 866 859 1 4 14 15 0 0

2 MERCED COUNTY01 MERCED MUNICIPAL 1,902 2,163 1,214 1,544 1,207 1,536 0 5 7 3 0 0

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 81 86 56 75 55 73 0 1 1 1 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 132 189 245 275 211 227 27 27 7 21 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 3,617 4,056 2,974 3,290 2,940 3,233 1 1 33 56 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 3,617 4,056 2,974 3,290 2,940 3,233 1 1 33 56 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 921 1,005 r 942 916 r 924 878 3 2 14 35 r 1 1

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 657 668 546 499 531 477 0 0 15 22 0 0

ORANGE COUNTY 15,078 16,014 16,815 16,689 16,642 16,505 22 12 151 172 0 0CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 3,650 3,334 5,043 3,910 5,017 3,883 3 0 23 27 0 0 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 3,663 4,358 3,524 4,073 3,484 4,033 1 0 39 40 0 0 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 2,633 2,465 3,082 3,231 3,049 3,182 3 3 30 46 0 0 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,963 2,496 2,154 2,443 2,114 2,400 8 6 32 37 0 0 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 3,169 3,361 3,012 3,032 2,978 3,007 7 3 27 22 0 0

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 1,754 1,762 2,192 1,775 2,167 1,757 0 0 25 18 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 66 i 0 i 66 i 0 i 66 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 205: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 9 GROUP C TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 198,602 213,526 r 185,146 189,600 r 182,762 187,203 r 585 508 r 1,792 1,883 r 7 6

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 8,851 9,958 6,978 6,961 6,896 6,860 18 61 64 40 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 2,833 3,535 2,436 2,353 2,410 2,332 0 2 26 19 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 1,075 1,005 r 762 1,157 747 1,151 2 5 13 1 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 1,645 1,578 736 1,202 729 1,192 6 6 1 4 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 3,298 3,840 3,044 2,249 3,010 2,185 10 48 24 16 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 7,243 7,843 6,768 6,429 6,583 6,313 170 95 15 21 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 6,470 7,023 6,029 5,615 5,847 5,539 170 56 12 20 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 773 820 739 814 736 774 0 39 3 1 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 409 460 358 364 357 357 0 3 1 4 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 11,765 12,480 11,689 10,073 r 11,622 10,022 38 26 r 29 25 r 0 0

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 15,988 16,386 14,573 15,505 14,349 15,254 2 2 222 249 0 0

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 3,076 2,794 2,803 2,592 2,765 2,539 0 2 38 51 0 0 02 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 5,022 4,961 3,826 3,829 3,753 3,761 0 0 73 68 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 5,880 6,379 5,800 6,674 5,718 6,570 0 0 82 104 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 2,010 2,252 2,144 2,410 2,113 2,384 2 0 29 26 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 1,663 1,862 1,614 1,717 1,582 1,662 16 2 16 53 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 1,663 1,862 1,614 1,717 1,582 1,662 16 2 16 53 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 4,160 4,807 3,180 3,592 3,148 3,559 3 2 29 29 0 2LODI MUNICIPAL 866 903 621 676 617 670 1 1 3 5 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 779 1,000 706 842 698 836 2 1 6 5 0 0 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 2,429 2,828 1,790 2,015 1,770 1,996 0 0 20 19 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 86 76 63 59 63 57 0 0 0 0 0 2

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 2,092 2,574 1,642 1,737 1,630 1,725 0 0 12 12 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 3,658 4,262 3,140 3,653 3,089 3,605 9 11 42 37 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 3,522 4,003 2,875 3,081 2,860 3,073 6 2 9 6 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,656 1,847 1,365 1,482 1,363 1,481 2 1 0 0 0 0 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,866 2,156 1,510 1,599 1,497 1,592 4 1 9 6 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 9,665 9,561 8,541 9,096 8,518 9,065 5 1 18 30 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 2,262 2,424 2,203 2,375 2,168 2,355 7 5 28 15 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 206: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 9 GROUP C TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 198,602 213,526 r 185,146 189,600 r 182,762 187,203 r 585 508 r 1,792 1,883 r 7 6

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 1,021 1,061 r 987 894 r 976 890 r 0 0 11 4 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 40 25 27 33 27 32 0 0 0 1 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 426 384 334 305 330 303 1 1 3 1 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 1,675 1,987 2,820 2,907 2,799 2,887 2 2 19 18 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 1,212 1,454 2,230 2,504 2,222 2,495 1 1 7 8 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 463 533 590 403 577 392 1 1 12 10 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 3,065 3,213 2,702 2,804 2,683 2,773 16 19 3 12 0 0

STANISLAUS COUNTY 2,819 3,117 2,541 2,934 2,497 2,880 6 5 38 49 0 0

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 2,819 3,117 2,433 2,916 2,403 2,868 0 3 30 45 0 0 03 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 108 18 r 94 12 r 6 2 8 4 r 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 554 595 429 454 425 453 2 0 2 1 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 438 500 394 414 384 407 1 1 9 5 0 1

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 153 132 202 194 146 101 53 92 3 1 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 3,335 3,834 2,917 2,853 2,830 2,800 5 5 82 48 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 3,335 3,834 r 2,917 2,853 r 2,830 2,800 r 5 5 82 48 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 370 356 373 348 368 346 1 0 4 2 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 3,817 4,483 3,519 4,229 3,439 4,165 14 3 66 61 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 1,244 1,245 1,558 1,122 1,540 1,079 4 40 14 3 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 671 848 400 574 394 571 0 0 6 3 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 207: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 10 GROUP D TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 561,797 623,735 r 591,123 689,334 r 574,816 675,340 r 10,925 7,393 r 4,324 4,651 r 1,058 1,950 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 20,604 23,816 33,245 36,753 32,769 36,052 351 579 125 122 0 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 1,130 1,733 2,185 1,775 2,156 1,763 14 6 15 6 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 1,700 2,261 3,238 2,384 3,208 2,352 7 18 23 14 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 2,375 2,441 2,071 2,748 2,060 2,732 3 9 8 7 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 1,729 1,483 4,057 4,964 3,776 4,471 265 465 16 28 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 9,729 10,502 9,643 10,992 9,612 10,948 9 20 22 24 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 3,941 5,396 12,051 13,890 11,957 13,786 53 61 41 43 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 12 23 20 11 20 11 0 0 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 589 932 537 788 537 781 0 3 0 4 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 648 940 1,309 1,879 1,199 1,802 15 1 10 30 85 46

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 378 602 474 639 438 628 13 0 4 10 19 1 04 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 270 338 835 1,240 761 1,174 2 1 6 20 66 45

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 519 732 624 580 621 575 0 0 3 5 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 337 363 325 365 322 364 0 0 3 1 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 9,454 12,085 11,082 11,161 10,575 10,697 38 42 88 98 381 324BAY MUNICIPAL 1,492 2,552 2,441 3,025 2,436 2,877 1 1 0 2 4 145 DELTA MUNICIPAL 3,699 4,532 3,666 3,704 3,358 3,517 16 27 21 58 271 102 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 2,173 2,577 1,887 2,372 1,828 2,302 2 7 15 3 42 60 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 2,090 2,424 3,049 2,016 2,915 1,957 18 7 52 35 64 17 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 39 44 38 44 1 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 510 677 1,842 1,183 1,838 1,161 2 0 2 22 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 3,001 2,268 r 3,758 2,871 r 3,708 2,814 r 10 6 r 6 12 r 34 39 r

FRESNO COUNTY 20,338 17,888 23,263 21,916 23,147 21,768 52 58 64 90 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 6,399 6,917 8,002 6,826 7,957 6,775 38 45 7 6 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 13,939 10,971 15,261 15,090 15,190 14,993 14 13 57 84 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 421 514 287 1,153 273 1,113 8 17 6 23 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 2,554 2,118 2,291 2,402 2,158 2,373 118 19 15 10 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 208: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 10 GROUP D TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 561,797 623,735 r 591,123 689,334 r 574,816 675,340 r 10,925 7,393 r 4,324 4,651 r 1,058 1,950 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 2,610 2,204 2,594 1,746 2,588 1,738 r 5 5 r 1 3 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 704 794 552 656 552 655 0 0 0 1 0 0

KERN COUNTY 14,966 15,270 21,598 22,268 21,192 21,832 108 64 280 180 18 192BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 6,977 7,214 8,859 8,878 8,803 8,817 0 0 56 61 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 2,550 2,047 4,818 4,540 4,780 4,501 6 15 32 21 0 3 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 2,536 2,715 2,867 2,857 2,823 2,822 2 5 42 30 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 2,903 3,294 5,054 5,993 4,786 5,692 100 44 150 68 18 189

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 3,813 3,730 5,060 5,873 4,997 5,815 35 30 28 28 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 1,279 1,921 1,120 1,996 780 1,382 329 601 11 13 0 0 05 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 167 300 194 371 187 347 0 3 7 21 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 213,173 228,919 190,126 187,147 188,402 185,484 308 554 1,416 1,109 0 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 3,979 5,311 3,557 4,739 3,513 4,706 0 2 44 31 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 5,059 6,505 4,963 6,069 4,953 6,045 0 0 10 24 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 1,178 1,398 992 892 978 877 10 13 4 2 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 1,956 2,426 1,822 2,126 1,813 2,116 0 3 9 7 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 12,149 14,303 11,005 16,012 10,892 15,630 52 301 61 81 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 11,026 12,872 9,423 10,970 9,369 10,931 39 26 15 13 0 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 1,482 2,533 1,472 1,997 1,470 1,962 0 2 2 33 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 6,456 5,829 5,738 4,713 5,670 4,630 24 35 44 48 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 5,946 6,909 7,409 6,001 7,405 5,986 0 1 4 14 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 2,328 2,836 2,564 2,429 2,500 2,397 0 1 64 31 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 9,636 8,395 8,074 6,404 8,038 6,373 0 0 36 31 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 14,666 14,697 13,998 12,622 13,904 12,584 47 28 47 10 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 90,634 93,932 76,932 71,216 76,160 70,667 0 0 772 549 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 3,539 3,312 2,834 2,920 2,802 2,889 13 17 19 14 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 2,807 2,455 2,402 2,232 2,375 2,212 0 0 27 20 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 4,284 4,247 3,638 3,422 3,582 3,382 2 3 54 37 0 0 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 2,899 3,670 3,377 3,171 3,376 3,168 0 1 1 2 0 0 POMONA MUNICIPAL 6,035 6,781 4,371 4,336 4,350 4,321 0 0 21 15 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 5,541 6,081 5,088 5,507 5,046 5,473 21 15 21 19 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 2,017 2,056 2,426 2,329 2,425 2,327 0 0 1 2 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 1,834 1,912 1,695 1,536 1,683 1,529 0 0 12 7 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 209: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 10 GROUP D TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 561,797 623,735 r 591,123 689,334 r 574,816 675,340 r 10,925 7,393 r 4,324 4,651 r 1,058 1,950 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 8,786 8,175 7,449 5,997 7,329 5,881 69 72 51 44 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 3,138 6,820 4,217 4,856 4,166 4,801 31 25 20 30 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 5,798 5,464 4,680 4,651 4,603 4,597 0 9 77 45 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 2,974 3,962 3,171 3,544 3,061 3,478 57 43 53 23 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 4,125 4,467 4,770 9,334 4,630 9,239 36 36 104 59 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 201 226 140 205 140 203 0 0 0 2 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 2,475 2,306 r 2,845 2,017 2,804 1,972 13 8 28 36 0 1

2 MERCED COUNTY06 MERCED MUNICIPAL 8,443 8,809 5,352 5,593 5,315 5,550 11 10 26 33 0 0

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 250 197 305 346 288 344 2 1 15 1 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 305 367 297 319 292 305 1 10 4 4 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 5,639 6,146 4,642 4,764 r 4,610 4,742 3 1 r 29 21 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 5,639 6,146 4,642 4,764 r 4,610 4,742 3 1 r 29 21 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 914 735 r 922 863 884 811 0 10 13 8 25 34

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 1,856 2,123 r 2,884 3,976 2,777 3,833 0 14 43 73 64 56

ORANGE COUNTY 17,116 29,927 18,393 49,603 18,197 48,476 29 117 106 240 61 770CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 2,534 5,647 4,361 13,019 4,327 12,744 11 13 22 69 1 193 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 6,962 14,421 4,541 20,505 4,525 20,013 5 94 1 39 10 359 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 3,146 4,259 4,447 6,809 4,355 6,639 11 7 52 87 29 76 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 2,513 3,063 2,608 3,952 2,567 3,854 2 2 24 29 15 67 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 1,961 2,537 2,436 5,318 2,423 5,226 0 1 7 16 6 75

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 2,807 2,746 2,931 2,866 2,869 2,822 29 20 33 24 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 22 i 0 i 21 i 0 i 21 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 210: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 10 GROUP D TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 561,797 623,735 r 591,123 689,334 r 574,816 675,340 r 10,925 7,393 r 4,324 4,651 r 1,058 1,950 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 28,058 37,820 r 35,185 40,448 r 34,987 40,186 r 64 91 r 134 171 r 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 9,064 12,510 8,387 10,390 8,248 10,250 18 3 121 137 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 3,873 5,800 r 10,985 12,388 10,958 12,356 25 13 2 19 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 4,389 4,832 7,355 7,818 7,341 7,810 11 6 3 2 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 10,732 14,678 r 8,458 9,852 r 8,440 9,770 r 10 69 r 8 13 r 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 24,443 29,787 30,963 32,260 30,790 32,077 164 181 9 2 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 24,148 29,216 30,351 31,426 30,188 31,257 163 169 0 0 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 295 571 612 834 602 820 1 12 9 2 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 167 115 314 268 313 264 1 1 0 3 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 42,206 47,274 36,010 31,927 r 26,909 26,883 8,548 4,190 r 506 659 r 47 195

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 32,989 36,408 40,475 41,617 39,851 41,146 282 220 342 251 0 0

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 1,900 2,015 2,613 3,231 2,582 3,199 18 22 13 10 0 0 07 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 13,555 15,981 10,843 10,816 10,510 10,489 187 188 146 139 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 14,831 15,107 22,967 22,198 22,748 22,123 76 9 143 66 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 2,703 3,305 4,052 5,372 4,011 5,335 1 1 40 36 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 2,260 2,438 1,337 1,162 1,329 1,161 8 0 0 1 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 2,260 2,438 1,337 1,162 1,329 1,161 8 0 0 1 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 8,790 3,984 13,171 48,942 r 13,117 48,655 r 14 46 40 241 0 0LODI MUNICIPAL 1,095 337 1,498 2,287 r 1,485 2,255 r 6 10 7 22 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 2,330 1,354 2,935 19,316 2,906 19,155 5 11 24 150 0 0 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 4,348 1,184 7,896 26,438 7,884 26,344 3 25 9 69 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 1,017 1,109 842 901 842 901 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 4,416 4,931 4,895 5,255 4,842 5,166 19 12 34 77 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 3,063 5,325 r 3,954 5,425 3,932 5,384 8 22 14 19 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 4,780 3,436 5,072 4,103 5,049 4,090 13 8 10 4 0 1NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 2,498 2,489 2,315 2,675 2,313 2,663 1 8 1 3 0 1 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 2,282 947 2,757 1,428 2,736 1,427 12 0 9 1 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 28,796 31,336 27,127 46,967 26,949 46,778 64 40 114 149 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 1,270 1,415 1,768 2,412 1,728 2,375 12 7 25 25 3 5

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 211: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 10 GROUP D TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 561,797 623,735 r 591,123 689,334 r 574,816 675,340 r 10,925 7,393 r 4,324 4,651 r 1,058 1,950 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 1,970 1,109 r 1,732 1,436 r 1,716 1,428 r 4 0 12 8 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 53 56 56 44 56 44 0 0 0 0 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 577 877 468 1,733 451 1,656 4 26 13 51 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 4,440 4,564 4,200 5,028 4,126 4,896 20 40 54 92 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 2,752 3,134 2,643 3,609 2,615 3,525 7 21 21 63 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 1,688 1,430 1,557 1,419 1,511 1,371 13 19 33 29 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 4,029 4,119 5,668 7,098 5,258 6,648 15 44 95 164 300 242

STANISLAUS COUNTY 2,469 4,146 3,453 4,776 r 3,354 4,684 r 23 27 76 65 r 0 0

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 2,469 4,146 3,398 4,773 3,300 4,682 23 27 75 64 0 0 08 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 55 3 r 54 2 r 0 0 1 1 r 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 1,847 1,933 1,775 1,674 1,764 1,656 2 7 9 11 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 1,416 1,301 1,205 1,210 1,153 1,158 4 1 8 7 40 44

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 153 237 340 305 315 242 24 60 1 3 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 10,844 10,618 r 15,886 10,242 r 15,542 10,002 r 63 31 r 281 209 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 10,844 10,618 r 15,886 10,242 r 15,542 10,002 r 63 31 r 281 209 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 566 824 452 1,035 446 1,017 0 0 6 17 0 1

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 3,867 4,510 4,360 5,026 4,347 4,987 4 9 9 30 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 2,193 3,942 3,548 3,063 3,534 2,895 5 77 9 91 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 3,309 3,725 1,209 1,329 1,205 1,323 0 1 4 5 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 212: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 11 NONPARKING TRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 4,858,539 4,949,019 r 4,762,352 4,794,053 r 4,502,006 4,531,828 r 113,067 103,637 r 133,578 133,023 r 13,701 25,565 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 229,252 227,504 206,000 214,485 r 195,169 199,081 4,835 8,350 5,996 7,054 r 0 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 14,657 16,325 13,094 13,046 12,004 11,842 286 316 804 888 0 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 22,316 21,282 18,576 19,274 r 17,856 18,440 183 341 537 493 r 0 0 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 43,277 47,942 41,990 47,695 39,494 44,604 1,003 1,095 1,493 1,996 0 0 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 37,057 33,321 31,332 31,760 29,437 26,698 1,206 4,448 689 614 0 0 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 59,090 58,909 56,374 54,329 54,393 51,857 501 525 1,480 1,947 0 0 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 52,855 49,725 44,634 48,381 41,985 45,640 1,656 1,625 993 1,116 0 0 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 2,297 1,837 1,341 1,208 1,299 1,171 42 37 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 8,441 8,712 4,277 6,355 4,276 6,351 0 4 1 0 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 27,728 26,372 22,936 23,036 21,669 22,126 128 83 545 520 594 307

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 19,822 18,823 16,574 16,292 15,851 15,838 94 56 448 398 181 0 09 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 7,906 7,549 6,362 6,744 5,818 6,288 34 27 97 122 413 307

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 5,684 7,121 5,596 6,431 5,275 6,212 54 32 267 187 0 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 7,792 8,838 6,639 8,052 6,541 7,947 26 21 72 84 0 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 123,050 117,965 123,017 117,374 109,290 104,369 2,517 2,182 8,703 8,894 2,507 1,929BAY MUNICIPAL 41,040 37,515 39,306 35,671 33,957 30,804 1,390 1,250 3,349 3,036 610 581 DELTA MUNICIPAL 23,338 20,493 22,624 21,196 20,110 19,075 257 413 1,582 1,279 675 429 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 27,461 26,840 28,666 27,476 26,245 25,352 310 269 1,522 1,378 589 477 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 31,211 33,117 32,421 33,031 28,978 29,138 560 250 2,250 3,201 633 442 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 4,200 5,353 4,983 5,143 4,511 4,656 29 3 154 190 289 294

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 18,933 20,731 r 15,093 20,242 r 13,430 18,344 r 280 174 r 803 1,142 r 580 582 r

FRESNO COUNTY 85,010 83,417 69,763 68,653 68,003 66,779 555 472 1,205 1,402 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 31,975 32,148 27,048 27,302 26,516 26,794 485 440 47 68 0 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 53,035 51,269 42,715 41,351 41,487 39,985 70 32 1,158 1,334 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 7,668 8,681 5,989 6,821 5,826 6,568 47 74 116 179 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 14,605 17,673 14,098 17,015 13,371 16,321 429 280 291 412 7 2

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 213: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 11 NONPARKING TRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 4,858,539 4,949,019 r 4,762,352 4,794,053 r 4,502,006 4,531,828 r 113,067 103,637 r 133,578 133,023 r 13,701 25,565 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 37,896 42,990 30,094 28,671 29,240 27,767 319 330 535 556 0 18

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 14,294 14,973 13,881 14,815 13,549 14,386 1 4 331 425 0 0

KERN COUNTY 105,828 103,145 84,810 77,529 79,932 72,692 123 131 4,617 4,424 138 282BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 40,224 35,474 30,446 26,123 29,270 25,067 0 0 1,176 1,056 0 0 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 25,055 27,204 20,195 21,889 19,916 21,543 37 50 242 281 0 15 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 10,684 9,813 7,669 6,838 7,378 6,434 29 31 262 373 0 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 29,865 30,654 26,500 22,679 23,368 19,648 57 50 2,937 2,714 138 267

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 18,588 17,434 16,997 18,315 15,797 17,967 1,137 74 63 274 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 6,268 6,258 5,925 6,641 4,299 4,572 1,529 1,939 97 130 0 0 10 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 7,255 10,396 7,035 8,401 6,629 8,059 146 88 260 254 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1,459,535 1,437,726 1,503,220 1,466,386 r 1,446,635 1,413,675 14,178 15,997 42,405 36,709 r 2 5ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 43,794 46,488 44,165 48,869 42,586 47,079 8 4 1,571 1,786 0 0 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 35,444 37,377 37,523 39,952 36,889 39,108 0 2 634 842 0 0 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 23,640 23,550 23,357 24,619 22,446 22,922 360 1,244 551 453 0 0 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 19,774 21,602 19,434 22,216 18,784 21,620 107 110 543 486 0 0 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 72,791 74,126 71,971 76,178 69,096 72,481 1,472 1,926 1,403 1,771 0 0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 53,159 56,129 55,838 57,696 53,405 55,432 1,614 1,429 818 835 1 0 CULVER MUNICIPAL 25,136 23,893 23,513 21,860 22,698 20,862 106 89 709 909 0 0 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 35,879 32,665 36,586 31,627 r 34,955 30,229 701 674 930 724 r 0 0 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 36,187 39,101 42,930 44,526 41,362 42,729 576 809 992 988 0 0 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 36,670 37,472 37,319 40,562 35,004 38,108 1,215 1,193 1,100 1,261 0 0 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 32,640 31,620 32,674 30,887 30,959 29,272 3 0 1,712 1,615 0 0 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 78,562 72,607 73,612 75,216 69,419 71,798 2,785 3,049 1,408 369 0 0 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 544,413 535,332 601,966 559,650 584,338 545,695 0 0 17,628 13,955 0 0 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 23,221 22,949 21,958 24,344 20,629 23,076 691 660 638 608 0 0 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 38,418 32,782 37,146 31,890 35,668 31,145 1 4 1,477 741 0 0 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 59,846 59,554 57,160 59,123 55,784 57,682 20 20 1,355 1,420 1 1 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 32,683 38,488 33,450 36,921 31,108 34,484 713 1,255 1,629 1,178 0 4 POMONA MUNICIPAL 55,307 62,701 53,702 60,070 52,361 58,354 2 2 1,339 1,714 0 0 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 36,697 28,943 33,880 27,591 32,153 26,045 861 1,028 866 518 0 0 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 15,605 13,548 15,466 13,940 15,090 13,520 2 5 374 415 0 0 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 24,514 22,106 21,629 20,932 20,816 20,119 0 0 813 813 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 214: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 11 NONPARKING TRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 4,858,539 4,949,019 r 4,762,352 4,794,053 r 4,502,006 4,531,828 r 113,067 103,637 r 133,578 133,023 r 13,701 25,565 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 63,606 59,540 66,247 57,006 62,556 53,594 2,101 2,104 1,590 1,308 0 0 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 47,256 41,070 37,222 38,541 35,285 37,144 839 279 1,098 1,118 0 0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 24,293 24,083 24,472 22,170 23,244 21,177 1 111 1,227 882 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 15,864 16,055 11,660 11,750 11,107 11,051 53 31 265 392 235 276

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 40,452 38,041 40,324 37,170 36,531 33,597 905 884 2,888 2,689 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 1,371 1,778 839 1,074 797 1,024 9 1 24 24 9 25

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 11,096 12,169 r 10,195 11,384 9,713 10,987 69 83 412 314 1 0

2 MERCED COUNTY11 MERCED MUNICIPAL 35,856 36,576 36,673 36,791 35,451 35,832 242 188 980 770 0 1

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 2,203 2,024 1,702 1,541 1,658 1,510 2 4 42 27 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 3,498 5,081 3,847 4,834 3,806 4,703 8 65 33 66 0 0

MONTEREY COUNTY 59,419 57,962 58,613 51,157 r 56,237 48,720 833 637 r 1,543 1,800 0 0MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 59,419 57,962 58,613 51,157 r 56,237 48,720 833 637 r 1,543 1,800 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 16,157 11,908 r 15,046 11,707 13,888 10,598 116 199 393 219 649 691

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 13,205 16,143 9,833 13,275 8,864 12,131 19 42 360 397 590 705

ORANGE COUNTY 450,898 456,763 491,496 480,957 477,646 451,410 1,817 2,170 8,754 11,074 3,279 16,303CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 78,117 78,306 97,165 124,766 95,722 121,458 69 74 904 1,087 470 2,147 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 138,960 136,468 161,347 116,354 157,030 107,531 733 1,171 3,078 4,279 506 3,373 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 61,615 67,331 66,729 75,200 64,098 69,586 94 62 1,849 2,360 688 3,192 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 83,134 81,067 81,530 79,520 79,009 74,277 224 211 1,685 1,660 612 3,372 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 89,072 93,591 84,725 85,117 81,787 78,558 697 652 1,238 1,688 1,003 4,219

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 43,420 43,058 41,640 41,821 39,596 39,670 703 738 1,341 1,392 0 21

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 2,428 i 1,540 i 1,997 i 1,468 i 1,864 i 1,415 i 113 i 10 i 19 i 34 i 1 i 9 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 215: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 11 NONPARKING TRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 4,858,539 4,949,019 r 4,762,352 4,794,053 r 4,502,006 4,531,828 r 113,067 103,637 r 133,578 133,023 r 13,701 25,565 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 198,097 216,815 188,362 193,623 183,876 188,885 812 661 3,674 4,077 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 50,571 53,857 54,126 49,679 52,437 48,164 174 18 1,515 1,497 0 0 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 41,078 41,243 33,257 35,235 32,895 34,795 323 320 39 120 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 26,158 24,522 23,066 21,614 22,601 21,191 313 320 152 103 0 0 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 80,290 97,193 77,913 87,095 75,943 84,735 2 3 1,968 2,357 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 105,884 120,744 83,972 91,747 r 79,415 85,791 4,308 5,657 249 299 r 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 99,306 113,236 77,762 85,273 73,529 79,995 4,232 5,274 1 4 0 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 6,578 7,508 6,210 6,474 r 5,886 5,796 76 383 248 295 r 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 5,903 6,967 5,062 5,097 4,951 4,918 23 12 88 167 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 224,764 229,210 246,843 228,781 212,127 208,127 28,257 14,292 5,959 5,681 500 681

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 355,325 384,290 345,071 364,785 323,048 344,642 8,966 6,684 13,057 13,459 0 0

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 67,602 64,817 63,389 60,157 59,641 55,949 2,690 3,146 1,058 1,062 0 0 12 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 99,971 117,112 100,766 109,465 93,757 101,816 3,314 3,250 3,695 4,399 0 0 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 137,129 143,266 132,784 140,636 123,984 134,596 2,960 288 5,840 5,752 0 0 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 50,623 59,095 48,132 54,527 45,666 52,281 2 0 2,464 2,246 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 96,191 107,329 103,449 139,871 70,719 105,702 30,729 31,327 2,001 2,842 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 96,191 107,329 103,449 139,871 70,719 105,702 30,729 31,327 2,001 2,842 0 0 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 81,442 94,313 70,565 71,762 r 68,237 69,307 462 365 1,865 2,086 r 1 4LODI MUNICIPAL 14,650 17,188 12,598 11,090 r 12,204 10,623 127 79 267 388 r 0 0 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 22,092 25,063 18,563 21,751 r 17,839 20,920 86 77 637 751 r 1 3 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 41,379 48,718 36,966 36,410 35,757 35,255 248 209 961 946 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 3,321 3,344 2,438 2,511 2,437 2,509 1 0 0 1 0 1

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 44,377 48,929 45,874 45,517 44,697 44,254 453 321 724 942 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 120,583 121,051 107,031 113,831 103,201 109,237 1,543 1,926 2,287 2,663 0 5

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 64,499 69,332 62,243 66,210 60,380 63,328 485 1,537 1,378 1,338 0 7NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 32,904 31,926 36,447 36,706 35,449 35,645 127 168 871 886 0 7 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 31,595 37,406 25,796 29,504 24,931 27,683 358 1,369 507 452 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 226,539 222,888 222,750 248,944 214,676 241,221 1,867 1,365 6,207 6,358 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 35,955 38,186 34,137 34,198 32,417 32,573 177 146 1,407 1,397 136 82

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 216: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 11 NONPARKING TRAFFIC INFRACTION FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 4,858,539 4,949,019 r 4,762,352 4,794,053 r 4,502,006 4,531,828 r 113,067 103,637 r 133,578 133,023 r 13,701 25,565 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 22,360 25,213 r 29,658 26,032 r 28,892 25,047 r 158 407 r 608 578 r 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 554 562 551 565 538 557 0 0 13 8 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 16,528 15,453 12,370 11,354 11,223 10,078 437 655 710 621 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 69,584 68,798 65,204 66,990 62,727 64,885 788 547 1,689 1,558 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 51,020 50,898 48,812 49,793 47,676 48,799 331 210 805 784 0 0 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 18,564 17,900 16,392 17,197 15,051 16,086 457 337 884 774 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 52,766 53,949 49,024 52,157 44,216 48,112 0 284 877 743 3,931 3,018

STANISLAUS COUNTY 51,553 50,283 49,326 45,448 46,393 43,423 1,262 913 1,671 1,112 0 0

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 51,553 50,283 49,311 45,442 46,378 43,417 1,262 913 1,671 1,112 0 0 13 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 15 6 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 10,218 11,282 8,523 9,748 7,911 8,872 254 315 358 561 0 0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 11,427 10,774 11,058 10,506 10,484 9,909 53 75 269 209 252 313

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 2,831 2,626 1,816 1,657 1,773 1,601 13 30 30 26 0 0

TULARE COUNTY 40,153 47,159 r 34,153 33,713 r 33,008 33,033 r 150 93 r 995 587 r 0 0TULARE MUNICIPAL 40,153 47,159 r 34,153 33,713 r 33,008 33,033 r 150 93 r 995 587 r 0 0 TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 5,507 5,739 4,956 5,004 4,782 4,821 49 39 125 142 0 2

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 101,701 98,652 94,261 89,542 91,035 86,202 279 313 2,947 3,027 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 26,172 23,408 14,691 9,759 13,768 9,349 181 209 742 201 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 7,435 8,843 5,843 6,710 5,613 6,263 97 137 133 307 0 3

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 217: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 12 ILLEGAL PARKING FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 3,852 255,506 r 7,115 212,504 6,721 210,930 75 1,234 318 326 1 14

ALAMEDA COUNTY 115 302 1,547 2,975 1,539 2,948 5 5 3 22 0 0ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 6 17 1,071 1,935 1,070 1,935 0 0 1 0 0 0BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 29 37 32 70 32 70 0 0 0 0 0 0FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 0 8 312 562 311 559 1 0 0 3 0 0LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 80 235 107 189 101 165 4 5 2 19 0 0OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 0 5 25 219 25 219 0 0 0 0 0 0ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 0 2 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 0 2 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0CALAVERAS COUNTY

CALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0COLUSA COUNTY

COLUSA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 0 3 18 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 0

BAY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0DELTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 0 0 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 8 143 r 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FRESNO COUNTY 57 46 161 2,132 160 2,129 0 1 1 2 0 0CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 7 22 7 36 7 35 0 1 0 0 0 0FRESNO MUNICIPAL 50 24 154 2,096 153 2,094 0 0 1 2 0 0

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 150 0 119 0 0 0 31 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 218: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 12 ILLEGAL PARKING FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 3,852 255,506 r 7,115 212,504 6,721 210,930 75 1,234 318 326 1 14

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 6 3 10 3 10 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

KERN COUNTY 9 25 106 128 106 117 0 1 0 10 0 0BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 0 0 15 23 15 21 0 0 0 2 0 0EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 2 6 80 61 80 60 0 0 0 1 0 0NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 4 4 5 11 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 3 15 6 33 6 25 0 1 0 7 0 0

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1,712 1,777 2,050 2,878 1,902 2,774 22 19 126 85 0 0ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 40 47 35 46 25 36 0 0 10 10 0 0ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0BURBANK MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0CITRUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0COMPTON MUNICIPAL 0 0 23 24 23 23 0 0 0 1 0 0CULVER MUNICIPAL 10 35 20 40 17 35 0 0 3 5 0 0DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 8 13 19 12 18 12 1 0 0 0 0 0EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 0 28 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 1 3 10 4 9 4 0 0 1 0 0 0INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 116 115 134 89 121 83 8 6 5 0 0 0LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 1,164 1,079 1,324 1,078 1,244 1,030 0 0 80 48 0 0LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 815 1 815 0 0 0 0 0 0MALIBU MUNICIPAL 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0PASADENA MUNICIPAL 184 220 193 202 163 177 9 10 21 15 0 0POMONA MUNICIPAL 22 53 34 47 31 44 0 0 3 3 0 0RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 21 0 28 4 25 3 3 1 0 0 0 0SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 11 13 29 15 29 15 0 0 0 0 0 0SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 28 21 29 22 27 22 0 0 2 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 219: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 12 ILLEGAL PARKING FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 3,852 255,506 r 7,115 212,504 6,721 210,930 75 1,234 318 326 1 14

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 33 78 65 93 65 89 0 1 0 3 0 0SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 70 68 93 348 92 347 1 1 0 0 0 0WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 0 1 1 10 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 0 1 9 2 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 MERCED COUNTY16 MERCED MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MODOC COUNTY

MODOC MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MONO COUNTY

MONO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MONTEREY COUNTY 1 1 9 20 9 19 0 0 0 1 0 0

MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 1 1 9 20 9 19 0 0 0 1 0 0MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 1 0 r 17 3 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ORANGE COUNTY 405 379 504 530 495 508 2 6 6 10 1 6CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 2 5 1 6 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 277 226 281 210 279 203 1 3 1 1 0 3ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 21 38 52 62 51 52 0 2 1 6 0 2SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 6 2 49 10 48 10 0 0 1 0 0 0WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 99 108 121 242 116 237 1 1 3 3 1 1

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 6,017 0 6,017 0 0 0 0 0 0

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 i 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 220: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 12 ILLEGAL PARKING FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 3,852 255,506 r 7,115 212,504 6,721 210,930 75 1,234 318 326 1 14

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1,137 1,218 1,526 1,776 1,514 1,743 6 31 6 2 0 0DESERT MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 706 863 946 1,203 942 1,175 4 26 0 2 0 0THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 422 355 574 573 572 568 2 5 0 0 0 0WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 313 211 225 179 224 179 1 0 0 0 0 0SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 313 211 225 179 224 179 1 0 0 0 0 0SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 161 0 6 0 103 0 52 0 0

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 7 10 9 21 9 21 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 017 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 7 8 9 13 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 0SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 27 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 7 31 58 948 58 944 0 1 0 3 0 0LODI MUNICIPAL 1 6 0 69 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 5 18 27 226 27 225 0 0 0 1 0 0STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 1 7 31 652 31 649 0 1 0 2 0 0SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 0 0 6 775 5 775 1 0 0 0 0 0

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 0 251,199 0 192,420 0 191,338 0 1,047 0 35 0 0

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 221: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 12 ILLEGAL PARKING FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED JUVENILE

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS ORDERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 3,852 255,506 r 7,115 212,504 6,721 210,930 75 1,234 318 326 1 14

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 9 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 0 1 5 7 1 7 1 0 3 0 0 0NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 0 1 4 4 0 4 1 0 3 0 0 0VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 0 0 127 1,218 25 1,170 0 0 102 40 0 8

STANISLAUS COUNTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SUTTER COUNTY

SUTTER MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TEHAMA COUNTY

TEHAMA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TRINITY COUNTY

TRINITY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TULARE COUNTY 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TULARE MUNICIPAL 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 47 24 705 33 624 0 10 1 71 32 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 222: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 13 SMALL CLAIMS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 428,936 430,991 r 420,327 409,534 r 163,008 152,380 r 134,266 134,291 r 123,053 122,863 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 15,818 18,579 16,906 17,534 7,890 6,426 4,448 5,594 4,568 5,514ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 590 644 440 585 97 151 141 197 202 237 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 1,113 1,239 1,121 1,282 396 470 232 304 493 508 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 2,644 2,751 5,227 2,493 3,580 833 826 817 821 843 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 1,705 1,888 1,563 1,943 800 876 379 511 384 556 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 5,646 7,546 5,186 7,559 2,185 3,246 1,589 2,236 1,412 2,077 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 4,120 4,511 3,369 3,672 832 850 1,281 1,529 1,256 1,293 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 23 24 4 1 0 0 0 1 4 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 267 253 237 238 41 36 58 81 138 121

BUTTE COUNTY 1,832 1,912 1,415 1,579 500 558 415 358 500 663

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,354 1,426 1,026 1,148 394 458 323 352 309 338 19 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 478 486 389 431 106 100 92 6 191 325

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 244 295 210 269 28 50 72 103 110 116

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 163 151 118 113 41 37 1 4 76 72

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 9,798 10,156 10,441 9,998 4,673 4,074 2,402 2,487 3,366 3,437BAY MUNICIPAL 2,186 2,360 2,572 2,373 1,287 992 449 567 836 814 DELTA MUNICIPAL 2,010 1,894 1,836 1,977 655 726 563 563 618 688 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 2,976 3,164 3,381 3,058 1,604 1,335 798 785 979 938 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 2,626 2,738 2,652 2,590 1,127 1,021 592 572 933 997 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 165 159 130 123 23 23 30 33 77 67

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 2,520 2,511 r 2,062 2,239 r 803 829 r 579 628 r 680 782 r

FRESNO COUNTY 10,046 9,914 8,867 8,395 2,933 2,681 3,447 3,229 2,487 2,485CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 1,377 1,290 1,331 1,153 516 437 491 419 324 297 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 8,669 8,624 7,536 7,242 2,417 2,244 2,956 2,810 2,163 2,188

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 273 225 205 224 54 71 85 78 66 75

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,634 1,804 1,098 1,492 362 377 411 514 325 601

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 223: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 13 SMALL CLAIMS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 428,936 430,991 r 420,327 409,534 r 163,008 152,380 r 134,266 134,291 r 123,053 122,863 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 1,350 1,312 1,000 968 195 169 369 368 436 431

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 184 166 190 188 58 70 2 3 130 115

KERN COUNTY 5,630 6,108 5,558 6,354 2,342 2,881 1,476 1,924 1,740 1,549BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 4,247 4,543 4,120 4,271 1,865 1,857 1,196 1,528 1,059 886 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 707 814 612 699 120 127 135 183 357 389 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 387 484 572 1,143 287 817 101 169 184 157 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 289 267 254 241 70 80 44 44 140 117

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 976 1,216 r 992 1,240 r 143 297 r 474 570 r 375 373 r

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 528 658 535 1,354 212 974 190 249 133 131 20 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 297 278 246 220 51 51 3 46 192 123

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 150,503 144,294 168,899 148,823 r 78,987 66,685 r 46,015 42,304 r 43,897 39,834 rALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 2,076 1,923 2,238 2,007 911 791 539 532 788 684 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 3,647 3,253 3,533 5,288 1,574 3,172 1,091 1,176 868 940 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 3,213 3,271 5,226 3,527 3,519 1,899 857 882 850 746 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 1,672 1,828 2,872 3,183 1,711 2,028 596 562 565 593 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 7,941 7,887 8,522 10,064 3,669 5,374 2,997 2,877 1,856 1,813 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 3,452 3,451 4,616 3,415 2,396 1,466 1,237 1,077 983 872 CULVER MUNICIPAL 1,094 1,205 1,274 1,344 696 635 247 326 331 383 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 4,323 4,455 4,299 4,503 r 1,662 1,815 r 1,691 1,815 r 946 873 rEAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 4,184 4,423 4,385 4,893 1,761 2,139 1,804 1,943 820 811 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 3,048 2,555 2,993 3,234 1,366 1,675 872 699 755 860 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 4,078 5,239 4,635 5,690 2,238 2,789 911 948 1,486 1,953 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 6,678 6,865 6,929 6,899 2,868 2,612 2,648 2,725 1,413 1,562 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 70,047 60,822 77,338 52,558 35,145 20,478 19,250 14,809 22,943 17,271 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 2,893 3,069 2,976 3,092 1,189 1,296 1,113 1,136 674 660 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 1,405 1,411 1,549 1,489 1,039 935 182 185 328 369 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 1,881 1,940 2,444 2,740 1,464 1,741 469 492 511 507 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 3,583 3,983 4,262 3,944 2,140 1,620 1,225 1,190 897 1,134 POMONA MUNICIPAL 2,967 3,264 2,951 3,399 1,226 1,510 911 1,086 r 814 803 rRIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 3,389 4,244 4,024 4,753 1,577 2,078 1,524 1,620 923 1,055 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 1,506 1,654 1,589 1,741 637 727 550 545 402 469 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 2,156 2,383 2,791 2,127 1,617 823 391 501 783 803

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 224: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 13 SMALL CLAIMS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 428,936 430,991 r 420,327 409,534 r 163,008 152,380 r 134,266 134,291 r 123,053 122,863 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 7,386 7,405 7,730 10,232 3,750 5,408 2,045 2,127 1,935 2,697 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 4,017 3,777 5,891 4,566 3,224 1,891 1,529 1,634 1,138 1,041 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 3,867 3,987 3,832 4,135 1,608 1,783 1,336 1,417 888 935

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 1,183 1,173 1,242 1,066 479 401 386 290 377 375

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 1,970 2,060 1,938 1,901 683 720 487 477 768 704

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 122 133 93 111 9 46 34 15 50 50

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 790 786 620 629 180 171 218 203 222 255

2 MERCED COUNTY21 MERCED MUNICIPAL 3,002 2,945 2,956 2,722 1,087 1,008 1,255 1,119 614 595

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 201 174 175 144 51 42 83 61 41 41

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 221 231 217 221 96 88 0 33 121 100

MONTEREY COUNTY 3,074 3,256 2,364 2,397 339 440 1,087 939 938 1,018MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 3,074 3,256 2,364 2,397 339 440 1,087 939 938 1,018 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 874 1,017 825 966 311 320 1 6 513 640

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 766 1,165 649 904 84 101 213 369 352 434

ORANGE COUNTY 38,311 39,118 35,505 38,269 13,166 15,910 11,269 11,086 11,070 11,273CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 10,372 10,821 11,119 10,333 4,936 4,442 3,740 3,425 2,443 2,466 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9,371 9,452 7,531 7,401 2,374 2,003 2,792 2,898 2,365 2,500 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 5,881 6,390 4,561 4,788 1,332 1,540 1,556 1,520 1,673 1,728 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 5,139 5,202 5,355 8,774 2,233 5,695 1,172 1,185 1,950 1,894 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 7,548 7,253 6,939 6,973 2,291 2,230 2,009 2,058 2,639 2,685

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 2,788 2,715 2,645 2,865 1,033 1,037 792 916 820 912

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 130 i 67 i 67 i 48 i 29 i 11 i 4 i 4 i 34 i 33 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 225: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 13 SMALL CLAIMS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 428,936 430,991 r 420,327 409,534 r 163,008 152,380 r 134,266 134,291 r 123,053 122,863 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 19,791 18,712 14,965 15,840 2,950 2,760 7,243 6,965 4,772 6,115DESERT MUNICIPAL 4,875 5,028 3,746 4,036 591 650 1,608 1,676 1,547 1,710 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 1,993 2,064 1,230 1,878 280 307 529 834 421 737 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 2,683 2,293 2,253 2,032 842 576 669 652 742 804 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 10,240 9,327 7,736 7,894 1,237 1,227 4,437 3,803 2,062 2,864

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 14,168 14,276 r 11,596 12,356 r 3,309 3,497 4,249 4,765 r 4,038 4,094 rSACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 13,727 13,829 11,277 11,983 3,230 3,427 4,181 4,651 3,866 3,905 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 441 447 i 319 373 i 79 70 68 114 i 172 189 i

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 694 520 641 527 201 146 301 242 139 139

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 24,132 24,788 23,060 23,305 9,015 9,413 8,654 8,360 5,391 5,532

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 34,062 33,992 30,958 30,117 10,325 9,443 9,604 9,553 11,029 11,121

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 5,430 5,714 4,086 4,323 1,022 1,036 1,246 1,523 1,818 1,764 22 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 8,896 9,039 10,568 10,309 5,151 4,844 2,393 2,713 3,024 2,752 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 15,662 15,747 13,160 13,282 3,201 2,973 4,871 4,525 5,088 5,784 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 4,074 3,492 3,144 2,203 951 590 1,094 792 1,099 821

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 8,038 8,222 7,809 8,141 1,192 1,220 3,903 4,445 2,714 2,476SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 8,038 8,222 7,809 8,141 1,192 1,220 3,903 4,445 2,714 2,476 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 8,416 8,304 7,687 7,209 1,489 892 4,100 4,140 2,098 2,177LODI MUNICIPAL 1,209 1,225 1,042 1,012 265 267 407 420 370 325 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 1,619 1,841 1,974 1,636 792 278 723 840 459 518 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 5,588 5,238 4,671 4,561 432 347 2,970 2,880 1,269 1,334 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 2,273 2,651 1,857 2,169 615 767 521 651 721 751

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 6,025 6,669 5,268 5,756 1,600 1,627 1,692 2,011 1,976 2,118

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 4,007 4,339 3,246 3,537 1,237 1,086 668 1,162 1,341 1,289NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,645 1,820 1,562 1,597 536 397 446 583 580 617 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 2,362 2,519 1,684 1,940 701 689 222 579 761 672

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 13,691 15,226 12,287 14,202 3,935 4,637 4,620 5,725 3,732 3,840

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 2,273 2,597 2,124 1,925 922 623 542 557 660 745

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 226: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 13 SMALL CLAIMS FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 428,936 430,991 r 420,327 409,534 r 163,008 152,380 r 134,266 134,291 r 123,053 122,863 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 2,412 2,614 r 1,999 1,795 r 392 382 r 782 713 r 825 700 r

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 18 31 22 33 1 3 2 0 19 30

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 394 360 352 311 124 113 105 87 123 111

SOLANO COUNTY 3,764 3,677 3,118 3,448 919 1,024 1,025 1,147 1,174 1,277NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 2,101 1,999 1,581 1,758 458 466 464 616 659 676 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 1,663 1,678 1,537 1,690 461 558 561 531 515 601

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 4,594 5,166 4,588 4,983 1,805 2,071 1,319 1,392 1,464 1,520

STANISLAUS COUNTY 5,250 5,121 4,417 4,515 1,236 1,247 1,898 1,863 1,283 1,405

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 5,250 5,121 4,417 4,513 1,236 1,247 1,898 1,863 1,283 1,403 23 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 1,037 1,120 1,046 1,432 359 751 421 414 266 267

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 763 678 760 767 290 329 303 250 167 188

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 332 266 296 248 41 21 183 134 72 93

TULARE COUNTY 3,690 4,016 r 2,846 2,714 r 494 529 r 1,295 1,071 r 1,057 1,114 rTULARE MUNICIPAL 3,690 4,016 r 2,846 2,714 r 494 529 r 1,295 1,071 r 1,057 1,114 rTULARE SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 1,391 1,419 1,079 1,149 330 423 527 478 222 248

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 10,556 10,010 8,877 8,476 3,113 2,599 3,588 3,677 2,176 2,200

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 1,023 882 634 589 160 126 253 242 221 221

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 459 480 386 395 71 67 162 155 153 173

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 227: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 14 CIVIL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING SMALL CLAIMS)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 558,221 546,970 r 584,554 571,122 r 491,525 476,532 r 51,308 50,752 r 41,721 43,838 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 26,800 28,126 25,783 28,312 23,112 25,137 1,231 1,497 1,440 1,678ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 888 986 954 950 844 833 25 44 85 73 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 1,338 1,262 1,424 2,081 1,341 1,948 18 51 65 82 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 7,904 7,644 8,696 7,740 8,487 7,451 9 44 200 245 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 1,482 1,477 1,651 1,383 1,598 1,330 12 12 41 41 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 9,642 11,197 8,323 11,303 6,838 9,429 915 1,072 570 802 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 5,546 5,560 4,735 4,828 4,004 4,135 252 261 479 432 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 27 0 11 0 13 0 3

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 5 13 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 1

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 680 631 457 541 423 512 12 8 22 21

BUTTE COUNTY 2,527 2,583 1,935 3,301 1,701 3,037 96 84 138 180

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1,881 1,798 1,290 2,667 1,145 2,503 81 54 64 110 24 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 646 785 645 634 556 534 15 30 74 70

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 356 372 262 269 215 197 14 33 33 39

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 97 121 86 86 80 69 0 5 6 12

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 16,406 13,217 17,615 13,570 15,954 12,053 477 394 1,184 1,123BAY MUNICIPAL 6,417 4,127 6,972 4,063 6,180 3,347 183 176 609 540 DELTA MUNICIPAL 3,227 3,089 3,187 3,578 2,865 3,337 157 93 165 148 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 4,647 3,714 5,315 3,798 4,914 3,375 91 95 310 328 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 2,115 2,287 2,141 2,131 1,995 1,994 46 30 100 107 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 259 279 193 226 157 174 9 17 27 35

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 1,436 1,634 r 2,903 1,441 r 2,572 1,051 r 173 190 r 158 200 r

FRESNO COUNTY 11,878 11,861 12,600 11,900 11,760 10,996 355 419 485 485CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 1,065 1,009 983 985 897 914 29 35 57 36 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 10,813 10,852 11,617 10,915 10,863 10,082 326 384 428 449

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 175 187 112 153 87 121 14 11 11 21

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 1,604 1,623 1,790 1,284 1,517 1,001 94 123 179 160

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 228: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 14 CIVIL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING SMALL CLAIMS)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 558,221 546,970 r 584,554 571,122 r 491,525 476,532 r 51,308 50,752 r 41,721 43,838 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 1,023 993 758 801 554 503 157 206 47 92

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 101 92 134 105 114 92 0 0 20 13

KERN COUNTY 9,975 9,139 8,754 8,707 6,811 7,209 1,201 892 742 606BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 7,711 7,023 6,910 6,666 5,481 5,648 978 658 451 360 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 1,114 1,060 826 875 472 553 172 173 182 149 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 549 552 553 663 502 631 6 2 45 30 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 601 504 465 503 356 377 45 59 64 67

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 1,669 1,550 r 1,619 1,336 r 1,346 1,046 r 218 213 r 55 77 r

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 927 1,049 836 1,478 678 1,331 80 83 78 64 25 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 179 224 167 172 132 130 7 12 28 30

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 200,880 197,789 235,110 219,476 211,785 195,585 10,944 12,611 12,381 11,280ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 3,094 2,929 5,048 3,832 4,661 3,487 162 142 225 203 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 5,785 5,510 6,163 5,280 5,331 4,519 330 290 502 471 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 3,143 3,424 4,738 5,136 4,478 4,926 114 91 146 119 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 2,044 2,182 2,777 2,694 2,275 2,157 283 287 219 250 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 7,929 7,628 7,792 7,806 6,615 6,313 651 996 526 497 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 6,450 5,843 8,104 7,810 7,128 6,733 604 407 372 670 CULVER MUNICIPAL 1,532 1,885 2,370 3,618 2,134 3,374 112 130 124 114 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 4,190 4,236 4,225 4,230 4,039 4,083 78 66 108 81 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 2,308 2,273 2,898 2,790 2,559 2,365 113 209 226 216 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 3,713 3,677 3,744 3,604 3,335 3,219 205 143 204 242 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 7,985 7,918 9,197 9,903 7,798 8,324 527 668 872 911 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 11,767 12,103 12,428 12,139 10,269 9,920 1,203 1,076 956 1,143 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 98,169 96,766 117,661 95,563 108,922 87,098 4,222 5,638 4,517 2,827 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 4,056 3,801 3,662 3,822 3,189 3,404 198 199 275 219 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 1,698 1,496 1,526 1,467 1,313 1,312 108 44 105 111 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 2,707 2,365 3,333 4,286 3,028 3,986 61 10 244 290 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 4,244 4,335 5,987 3,622 5,294 2,966 250 253 443 403 POMONA MUNICIPAL 5,468 4,828 5,215 6,593 4,438 5,788 385 538 392 267 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 4,246 4,498 4,709 4,590 4,228 3,922 212 246 269 422 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 1,758 1,905 2,082 2,704 1,854 2,448 83 94 145 162 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 2,316 2,322 3,462 1,845 3,326 1,716 35 49 101 80

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 229: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 14 CIVIL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING SMALL CLAIMS)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 558,221 546,970 r 584,554 571,122 r 491,525 476,532 r 51,308 50,752 r 41,721 43,838 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 7,529 7,523 8,292 14,592 7,350 13,637 426 460 516 495 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 4,211 4,126 5,407 7,077 4,429 6,033 407 352 571 692 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 4,538 4,216 4,290 4,473 3,792 3,855 175 223 323 395

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 1,085 971 1,046 810 905 650 47 71 94 89

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 2,234 2,250 2,217 2,192 2,013 1,995 80 81 124 116

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 119 107 62 69 50 57 1 3 11 9

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 1,601 1,115 1,484 853 1,350 765 6 8 128 80

2 MERCED COUNTY26 MERCED MUNICIPAL 2,857 2,724 2,255 2,286 1,829 1,898 249 212 177 176

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 34 40 22 23 15 15 3 2 4 6

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 93 133 111 178 72 149 17 3 22 26

MONTEREY COUNTY 1,836 1,837 1,741 2,717 1,448 2,475 142 153 151 89MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 159 111 224 99 203 91 14 6 7 2 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 1,677 1,726 1,517 2,618 1,245 2,384 128 147 144 87

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 1,010 1,075 1,010 1,098 900 974 23 58 87 66

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 773 894 790 1,086 627 912 60 86 103 88

ORANGE COUNTY 45,413 45,539 48,699 46,025 39,861 37,018 5,545 5,578 3,293 3,429CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9,577 9,358 9,972 9,010 7,559 6,644 2,013 1,955 400 411 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 12,495 12,488 12,115 9,954 10,439 8,136 739 774 937 1,044 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 6,716 6,847 6,362 6,449 5,715 5,833 238 281 409 335 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 7,308 7,284 7,720 8,903 7,088 8,231 185 315 447 357 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9,317 9,562 12,530 11,709 9,060 8,174 2,370 2,253 1,100 1,282

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 2,087 2,381 1,843 2,060 1,591 1,746 89 115 163 199

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 113 i 62 i 64 i 81 i 49 i 43 i 2 i 19 i 13 i 19 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 230: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 14 CIVIL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING SMALL CLAIMS)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 558,221 546,970 r 584,554 571,122 r 491,525 476,532 r 51,308 50,752 r 41,721 43,838 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 23,717 23,964 r 21,542 23,441 15,459 17,088 2,912 2,931 3,171 3,422DESERT MUNICIPAL 4,989 5,424 4,642 4,332 3,914 3,401 452 455 276 476 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 2,382 2,339 r 2,230 3,202 1,132 1,937 862 1,029 236 236 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 3,798 3,649 2,950 4,379 2,112 3,755 258 99 580 525 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 12,548 12,552 11,720 11,528 8,301 7,995 1,340 1,348 2,079 2,185

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 26,667 17,991 r 26,716 23,353 10,112 7,095 10,253 8,585 6,351 7,673SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 26,136 17,436 r 26,367 22,865 9,828 6,677 10,239 8,556 6,300 7,632 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 531 555 349 488 284 418 14 29 51 41

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 382 374 311 362 272 315 7 5 32 42

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 33,627 31,796 30,017 30,270 22,280 23,171 4,895 4,461 2,842 2,638

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 41,287 41,397 42,593 41,966 35,817 35,586 4,137 4,005 2,639 2,375EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 7,344 7,280 6,660 6,841 5,370 5,689 569 582 721 570

2 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 9,572 9,478 9,124 9,702 8,227 8,815 502 499 395 388 27 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 19,849 20,156 21,799 21,470 17,648 17,512 2,819 2,688 1,332 1,270 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 4,522 4,483 5,010 3,953 4,572 3,570 247 236 191 147

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 13,028 12,669 13,402 13,392 10,337 10,334 2,496 2,467 569 591SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 13,028 12,669 13,402 13,392 10,337 10,334 2,496 2,467 569 591 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 9,338 9,253 7,755 4,355 r 6,211 2,392 1,127 1,043 417 920 rLODI MUNICIPAL 1,255 1,237 1,032 1,063 904 937 49 34 79 92 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 2,257 2,133 1,918 1,610 r 1,610 1,320 72 69 236 221 rSTOCKTON MUNICIPAL 5,826 5,883 4,805 1,682 3,697 135 1,006 940 102 607 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 2,651 2,521 3,104 2,819 2,804 2,470 11 14 289 335

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 7,664 8,423 8,111 8,670 7,243 7,729 381 411 r 487 530 r

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 3,798 3,674 3,038 2,918 r 2,569 2,282 300 332 r 169 304NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,801 1,786 1,443 1,404 r 1,199 1,095 117 118 r 127 191 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 1,997 1,888 1,595 1,514 1,370 1,187 183 214 42 113

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 18,730 19,509 16,951 19,891 15,662 18,455 626 763 663 673

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 2,197 2,548 2,273 2,513 2,030 2,234 143 173 100 106

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 231: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 14 CIVIL FILINGS AND DISPOSITIONS (EXCLUDING SMALL CLAIMS)

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

DISPOSITIONS AFTER TRIALTOTAL TOTAL DISPOSITIONS UNCONTESTED CONTESTED

FILINGS DISPOSITIONS BEFORE TRIAL MATTERS MATTERS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 558,221 546,970 r 584,554 571,122 r 491,525 476,532 r 51,308 50,752 r 41,721 43,838 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 4,095 4,984 r 3,781 4,763 r 3,187 4,346 r 263 127 r 331 290 r

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 23 14 14 13 7 9 1 0 6 4

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 339 276 295 267 251 222 23 21 21 24

SOLANO COUNTY 5,535 5,355 5,435 5,142 4,884 4,567 96 152 455 423NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 2,881 2,811 2,783 2,661 2,552 2,347 60 133 171 181 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 2,654 2,544 2,652 2,481 2,332 2,220 36 19 284 242

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 4,536 5,161 4,323 4,692 3,925 4,204 137 196 261 292

STANISLAUS COUNTY 6,906 8,089 6,533 13,789 r 5,409 12,017 r 855 467 269 1,305 r

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 6,906 8,089 6,482 13,763 5,389 12,009 845 460 248 1,294 28 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 0 0 51 26 r 20 8 r 10 7 21 11 r

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 916 900 927 944 632 754 198 105 97 85

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 509 596 380 531 337 465 17 26 26 40

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 66 70 47 25 39 16 3 1 5 8

TULARE COUNTY 5,009 5,940 r 4,187 4,030 r 3,858 3,302 r 102 289 r 227 439 rTULARE MUNICIPAL 3,060 3,769 r 2,646 2,748 r 2,424 2,134 r 56 218 r 166 396 TULARE SUPERIOR 1,949 2,171 r 1,541 1,282 r 1,434 1,168 r 46 71 r 61 43 r

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 566 562 537 580 457 473 32 47 48 60

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 8,024 7,898 7,464 7,476 6,571 6,645 426 454 467 377

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 1,376 1,393 1,442 1,375 837 763 385 394 220 218

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 1,003 1,002 917 906 626 655 136 96 155 155

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 232: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 15 NUMBER OF JURY DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

REDUCED GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C GROUP D TOTAL FELONIES MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS CIVIL

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 6,346 5,871 r 60 48 r 3,087 2,818 r 142 112 1,600 1,656 r 248 185 r 1,209 1,052 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 180 181 0 0 81 88 2 0 32 44 1 3 64 46ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 26 24 0 0 9 11 1 0 3 3 0 0 13 10 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 26 33 0 0 10 18 1 0 4 4 0 1 11 10 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 10 5 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 75 66 0 0 44 32 0 0 14 15 0 0 17 19 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 40 53 0 0 12 26 0 0 10 20 1 2 17 5 ALAMEDA SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 17 12 0 0 10 5 0 0 6 4 0 1 1 2

BUTTE COUNTY 19 21 0 1 11 13 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 0

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 18 12 0 0 11 6 0 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 29 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 1 9 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 11 4 0 1 5 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 7 7 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 6 0 0 1 0

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 194 261 4 2 77 109 3 7 70 108 1 5 39 30BAY MUNICIPAL 69 82 2 1 25 33 0 0 31 35 0 2 11 11 DELTA MUNICIPAL 37 57 0 0 23 29 0 6 9 17 1 2 4 3 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 21 42 0 0 11 32 0 0 5 7 0 1 5 2 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 60 80 2 1 12 15 3 1 24 49 0 0 19 14 CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 4 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 35 27 r 0 0 20 16 r 0 3 7 6 r 6 1 r 2 1 r

FRESNO COUNTY 78 127 1 9 24 48 0 1 32 38 0 8 21 23CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 30 29 0 1 13 17 0 0 16 8 0 3 1 0 FRESNO MUNICIPAL 48 98 1 8 11 31 0 1 16 30 0 5 20 23

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 62 36 2 0 22 16 12 2 18 10 5 1 3 7

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 233: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 15 NUMBER OF JURY DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

REDUCED GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C GROUP D TOTAL FELONIES MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS CIVIL

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 6,346 5,871 r 60 48 r 3,087 2,818 r 142 112 1,600 1,656 r 248 185 r 1,209 1,052 r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 12 6 0 0 6 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 2

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 1 5 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

KERN COUNTY 152 115 0 2 103 39 7 2 29 28 3 4 10 40BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 134 65 0 2 93 33 6 2 27 24 2 2 6 2 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 5 19 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 2 17 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 11 31 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 21

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 46 18 r 1 0 17 11 0 0 13 4 13 0 2 3 r

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 6 9 1 0 3 4 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 30 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 10 10 1 0 4 6 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2,238 1,909 11 9 1,183 1,013 33 20 410 407 66 55 535 405ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 37 26 0 0 18 7 0 0 5 7 0 0 14 12 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 53 48 0 2 34 25 0 1 12 12 1 1 6 7 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 44 38 0 0 14 12 0 0 10 16 0 2 20 8 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 21 14 0 0 14 4 1 0 2 3 0 0 4 7 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 159 180 0 0 101 115 1 3 37 34 13 8 7 20 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 167 63 2 1 51 26 2 1 21 21 2 1 89 13 CULVER MUNICIPAL 28 21 0 0 13 5 0 0 3 1 0 3 12 12 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 81 79 0 0 42 40 0 6 15 17 8 6 16 10 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 50 68 1 0 28 46 0 0 13 7 0 4 8 11 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 56 47 0 0 35 21 0 0 8 12 1 1 12 13 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 45 40 0 1 25 21 0 1 7 7 1 0 12 10 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 81 81 1 1 46 35 0 0 10 24 4 1 20 20 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 858 644 2 2 504 399 19 2 146 121 20 13 167 107 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 30 31 0 0 17 14 0 0 8 8 1 0 4 9 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 17 21 2 2 2 4 0 0 7 3 1 0 5 12 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 48 35 0 0 20 14 1 0 14 18 3 0 10 3 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 29 29 0 0 7 13 1 0 5 6 0 1 16 9 POMONA MUNICIPAL 80 62 1 0 36 26 1 0 20 13 1 4 21 19 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 69 84 0 0 29 37 0 2 16 24 2 4 22 17 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 11 13 0 0 7 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 7 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 39 44 2 0 19 24 2 4 6 6 0 3 10 7

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 234: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 15 NUMBER OF JURY DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

REDUCED GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C GROUP D TOTAL FELONIES MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS CIVIL

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 6,346 5,871 r 60 48 r 3,087 2,818 r 142 112 1,600 1,656 r 248 185 r 1,209 1,052 r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 95 104 0 0 40 46 3 0 11 16 1 1 40 41 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 86 71 0 0 51 31 1 0 20 15 5 0 9 25 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 54 66 0 0 30 45 1 0 13 14 2 1 8 6

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 13 20 1 0 7 11 1 2 3 3 1 2 0 2

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 101 75 14 2 15 17 3 0 38 48 15 4 16 4

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 17 13 0 0 8 3 2 0 5 7 1 2 1 1

2 MERCED COUNTY31 MERCED MUNICIPAL 13 13 0 0 5 8 0 0 5 4 1 0 2 1

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 7 4 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

MONTEREY COUNTY 99 100 0 0 68 45 0 1 28 47 2 6 1 1MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 98 99 0 0 68 45 0 1 28 47 2 6 0 0 MONTEREY SUPERIOR 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL 23 22 r 0 0 6 8 r 2 0 10 13 r 0 1 5 0

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 37 33 0 0 16 13 1 1 14 16 0 0 6 3

ORANGE COUNTY 595 598 6 1 280 291 6 6 147 167 8 6 148 127CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 101 103 0 1 32 39 2 0 17 24 4 0 46 39 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 164 171 4 0 106 125 1 1 40 40 0 0 13 5 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 107 120 0 0 34 40 2 0 25 39 0 1 46 40 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 98 116 0 0 44 52 0 0 35 42 2 3 17 19 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 125 88 2 0 64 35 1 5 30 22 2 2 26 24

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 30 25 0 1 12 12 2 3 12 3 1 0 3 6

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 2 i 1 i 0 i 0 i 2 i 1 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i 0 i

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 235: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 15 NUMBER OF JURY DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

REDUCED GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C GROUP D TOTAL FELONIES MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS CIVIL

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 6,346 5,871 r 60 48 r 3,087 2,818 r 142 112 1,600 1,656 r 248 185 r 1,209 1,052 r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 143 124 r 1 0 62 67 r 5 1 66 47 5 6 r 4 3DESERT MUNICIPAL 53 33 1 0 23 11 1 0 26 20 1 1 1 1 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 15 17 0 0 5 14 1 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 23 22 0 0 11 11 3 0 7 8 1 2 1 1 WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 52 52 r 0 0 23 31 r 0 1 24 16 3 3 r 2 1

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 164 126 1 1 119 50 5 16 36 52 1 5 2 2SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 163 123 1 1 119 50 5 16 35 51 1 5 2 0 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 18 8 0 0 16 2 0 0 1 5 0 1 1 0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 179 88 r 2 0 59 55 4 3 35 23 r 73 3 6 4 r

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 615 654 4 3 262 316 9 4 218 243 10 15 112 73

2 EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 99 110 0 0 47 44 1 1 38 52 2 1 11 12 32 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 174 177 0 0 68 91 1 1 70 65 0 4 35 16 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 253 291 3 3 99 136 5 2 79 101 4 7 63 42 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 89 76 1 0 48 45 2 0 31 25 4 3 3 3

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY 175 109 0 0 49 23 1 0 16 13 0 1 109 72SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 175 109 0 0 49 23 1 0 16 13 0 1 109 72 SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 103 105 0 0 58 53 7 2 27 29 1 0 10 21LODI MUNICIPAL 10 12 0 0 7 3 0 0 2 5 0 0 1 4 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 18 16 0 0 10 9 1 0 5 5 0 0 2 2 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 75 77 0 0 41 41 6 2 20 19 1 0 7 15 SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 32 41 0 0 21 28 1 3 10 7 0 2 0 1

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 100 109 r 0 1 41 51 1 0 44 39 5 6 9 12 r

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 68 43 r 0 0 45 25 1 0 12 4 4 4 6 10 rNORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 19 11 r 0 0 15 7 1 0 2 0 1 3 0 1 rSANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 49 32 0 0 30 18 0 0 10 4 3 1 6 9

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 116 124 0 5 58 50 3 13 21 27 3 4 31 25

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 47 46 0 0 12 18 1 1 28 17 3 1 3 9

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 236: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 15 NUMBER OF JURY DISPOSITIONS

FISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

REDUCED GROUP A GROUP B GROUP C GROUP D TOTAL FELONIES MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS MISDEMEANORS CIVIL

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 1996–97 1995–96 STATE TOTAL 6,346 5,871 r 60 48 r 3,087 2,818 r 142 112 1,600 1,656 r 248 185 r 1,209 1,052 r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 31 17 r 2 0 16 13 r 2 1 6 2 4 1 1 0

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 11 7 0 0 9 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0

SOLANO COUNTY 56 66 0 1 29 37 4 0 14 12 0 11 9 5NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 27 36 0 1 11 16 4 0 7 7 0 11 5 1 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 29 30 0 0 18 21 0 0 7 5 0 0 4 4

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 45 67 1 0 25 17 8 7 9 16 2 2 0 25

STANISLAUS COUNTY 95 168 r 7 8 r 32 77 r 3 1 30 36 r 4 4 r 19 42 r

2 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 58 140 0 0 19 66 3 1 22 30 3 3 11 40 33 STANISLAUS SUPERIOR 37 28 r 7 8 r 13 11 r 0 0 8 6 r 1 1 r 8 2 r

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 3 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 2 10 0 0 0 6 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 5 3 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0

TULARE COUNTY 113 137 r 0 0 77 68 r 3 2 25 30 r 4 6 4 31TULARE MUNICIPAL 110 137 r 0 0 77 68 r 3 2 25 30 r 4 6 1 31 TULARE SUPERIOR 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 22 16 0 0 15 7 0 1 4 2 1 4 2 2

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 156 124 0 0 71 55 3 0 69 60 0 3 13 6

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 24 4 0 0 10 3 0 0 13 1 1 0 0 0

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 9 7 0 0 2 4 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 1

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 237: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 16 TOTAL CASES AWAITING TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

CASES AWAITING TRIAL AT END OF MONTH NUMBER TOTAL CASES

OF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIALPOSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 105,851 102,553 r 33,664 36,230 r 72,187 66,323 r 129 a 124 a,r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 43.0 42.3 2,629 3,469 591 1,023 2,038 2,446 61 82ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 130 128 37 42 93 86 65 64BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 296 345 63 80 233 265 59 69FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 600 290 136 145 464 145 100 48LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 4.0 3.3 409 472 173 149 236 323 102 143OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 17.0 17.0 807 1,504 0 418 807 1,086 47 88SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 387 730 182 189 205 541 43 81

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 6 14 0 0 6 14 6 14

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 26 26 3 4 23 22 26 26

BUTTE COUNTY 4.0 4.0 328 370 115 102 213 268 82 93

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 141 253 67 62 74 191 71 12734 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 187 117 48 40 139 77 94 59CALAVERAS COUNTY

CALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 75 119 13 15 62 104 75 119COLUSA COUNTY

COLUSA MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 61 50 5 5 56 45 61 50

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 18.0 18.0 3,622 3,230 478 465 3,144 2,765 201 179BAY MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 1,564 1,319 202 197 1,362 1,122 261 220DELTA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 685 616 74 61 611 555 228 205MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 692 668 79 83 613 585 138 134WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 681 627 123 124 558 503 170 157

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 358 288 r 29 40 r 329 248 r 119 96 r

FRESNO COUNTY 20.0 20.0 1,032 i 992 i,r 218 i 216 i,r 814 i 776 i,r 86 83CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —FRESNO MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 1,032 992 r 218 216 r 814 776 r 86 83 r

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 50 44 6 0 44 44 50 44

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 447 384 65 58 382 326 112 96

a Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trialr Revised i Incomplete data

Page 238: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 16 TOTAL CASES AWAITING TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

CASES AWAITING TRIAL AT END OF MONTH NUMBER TOTAL CASES

OF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIALPOSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 105,851 102,553 r 33,664 36,230 r 72,187 66,323 r 129 a 124 a,r

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 5.8 4.8 430 309 31 13 399 296 74 64

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 146 123 4 8 142 115 146 123

KERN COUNTY 21.0 19.0 1,175 1,157 169 306 1,006 851 56 61BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 780 770 110 171 670 599 71 70EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 61 153 26 97 35 56 20 51NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 4.0 3.0 126 132 6 8 120 124 32 44SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 3.0 2.0 208 102 27 30 181 72 69 51

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 198 219 16 26 182 193 50 55

LAKE COUNTY

2 LAKE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 88 111 23 11 65 100 44 5635 LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 65 52 9 9 56 43 65 52

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 259.0 258.0 41,906 40,755 23,838 23,969 18,068 16,786 162 158ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 890 946 271 248 619 698 223 237ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 735 709 158 185 577 524 123 118BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 660 582 402 343 258 239 132 116BURBANK MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 393 462 167 176 226 286 131 154CITRUS MUNICIPAL 10.0 9.0 984 1,140 331 306 653 834 98 127COMPTON MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 1,578 1,535 484 561 1,094 974 113 110CULVER MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 280 373 134 194 146 179 93 124DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 574 524 231 210 343 314 82 75EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 724 720 269 315 455 405 103 103GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 940 735 369 232 571 503 188 147INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 1,018 987 510 528 508 459 127 123LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 13.0 13.0 1,509 1,322 674 532 835 790 116 102LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 112.0 112.0 24,615 23,817 17,034 17,395 7,581 6,422 220 213LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 540 448 271 242 269 206 108 90MALIBU MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 524 352 264 98 260 254 175 117NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 639 522 175 147 464 375 213 174PASADENA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 900 874 369 315 531 559 150 146POMONA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 665 773 220 222 445 551 111 129RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 599 523 217 233 382 290 100 87

a Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trialr Revised i Incomplete data

Page 239: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 16 TOTAL CASES AWAITING TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

CASES AWAITING TRIAL AT END OF MONTH NUMBER TOTAL CASES

OF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIALPOSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 105,851 102,553 r 33,664 36,230 r 72,187 66,323 r 129 a 124 a,r

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 330 269 111 112 219 157 110 90SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 664 700 416 472 248 228 166 175SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 888 1,012 262 323 626 689 81 92SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 542 714 254 337 288 377 60 79WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 715 716 245 243 470 473 119 119

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 191 i 146 i 42 i 34 i 149 i 112 i — —

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 1,162 932 190 287 972 645 194 155

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —

2 MENDOCINO COUNTY36 MENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 386 197 32 21 354 176 55 28MERCED COUNTY

MERCED MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 505 516 45 45 460 471 101 103MODOC COUNTY

MODOC MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 30 12 1 0 29 12 30 12MONO COUNTY

MONO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 19 16 2 0 17 16 19 16MONTEREY COUNTY

MONTEREY MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 1,008 816 0 0 1,008 816 92 74NAPA COUNTY

NAPA MUNICIPAL 3.0 4.0 — i — i — i — i — i — i — —NEVADA COUNTY

NEVADA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 209 146 37 30 172 116 70 49

ORANGE COUNTY 62.0 60.0 8,386 6,076 1,652 3,256 6,734 2,820 135 101CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 15.0 15.0 1,647 1,207 287 418 1,360 789 110 80NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 16.0 15.0 2,421 2,019 581 1,827 1,840 192 151 135ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 10.0 10.0 891 881 223 392 668 489 89 88SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9.0 8.0 1,688 720 230 214 1,458 506 188 90WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 1,739 1,249 331 405 1,408 844 145 104

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 455 639 7 68 448 571 91 128

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 36 — i 6 — i 30 — i 36 —

a Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trialr Revised i Incomplete data

Page 240: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 16 TOTAL CASES AWAITING TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

CASES AWAITING TRIAL AT END OF MONTH NUMBER TOTAL CASES

OF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIALPOSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 105,851 102,553 r 33,664 36,230 r 72,187 66,323 r 129 a 124 a,r

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 32.0 32.0 3,082 i 4,485 r 640 i 664 r 2,442 i 3,821 r 96 140DESERT MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 776 1,046 114 197 662 849 97 131MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 — i 249 r — i 69 r — i 180 r — 42 rTHREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 — i 872 — i 124 — i 748 — 218WESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 2,306 2,318 526 274 1,780 2,044 165 166

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 23.0 22.5 1,985 i 2,254 i 12 i 7 i 1,973 2,247 86 100SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 22.0 21.5 1,955 i 2,221 i — i — i 1,955 2,221 — —SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 30 33 12 7 18 26 30 33

SAN BENITO COUNTY

SAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 46 43 9 4 37 39 46 43

2 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY37 SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 34.0 34.0 4,546 5,321 494 668 4,052 4,653 134 157

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 71.0 71.0 9,008 9,120 1,563 1,283 7,445 7,837 127 128EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 1,084 874 132 121 952 753 90 73NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 1,786 2,138 426 206 1,360 1,932 128 153SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 36.0 36.0 5,484 5,320 933 861 4,551 4,459 152 148SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 654 788 72 95 582 693 73 88

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTYSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 24.0 24.0 7,222 6,544 361 421 6,861 6,123 301 273

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 14.0 14.0 2,099 1,769 813 612 1,286 1,157 150 126LODI MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 267 222 120 89 147 133 134 111MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 720 476 160 131 560 345 180 119STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 1,112 1,071 533 392 579 679 139 134

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 281 252 42 45 239 207 47 42

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 1,274 1,464 286 261 988 1,203 91 105

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 13.0 12.0 565 647 93 64 472 583 43 54NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 7.0 6.0 326 287 46 40 280 247 47 48SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 239 360 47 24 192 336 40 60

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 40.0 40.0 2,788 2,788 413 344 2,375 2,444 70 70

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 407 302 90 89 317 213 58 43

a Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trialr Revised i Incomplete data

Page 241: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 16 TOTAL CASES AWAITING TRIAL

AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

CASES AWAITING TRIAL AT END OF MONTH NUMBER TOTAL CASES

OF JUDICIAL PER JUDICIALPOSITIONS TOTAL CIVIL CRIMINAL POSITION

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 105,851 102,553 r 33,664 36,230 r 72,187 66,323 r 129 a 124 a,r

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 498 433 r 55 58 r 443 375 r 100 87 r

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 11 8 3 1 8 7 11 8

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 96 73 7 1 89 72 32 24

SOLANO COUNTY 10.0 10.0 553 743 126 314 427 429 55 74NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 54 143 54 141 0 2 9 24VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 499 600 72 173 427 427 125 150

SONOMA COUNTY

2 SONOMA MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 1,412 1,036 534 526 878 510 157 11538 STANISLAUS COUNTYSTANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 721 1,062 7 428 714 634 80 118

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 191 117 r 13 12 r 178 105 r 96 59 r

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 168 121 80 49 88 72 84 61

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 33 38 r 0 3 r 33 35 r 33 38 r

TULARE COUNTYTULARE MUNICIPAL 10.0 10.0 525 702 r 48 26 r 477 676 r 53 70 r

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 110 146 10 4 100 142 55 73

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 13.0 13.0 1,828 700 284 281 1,544 419 141 54

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 867 740 24 19 843 721 173 148

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 506 437 30 35 476 402 253 219

a Excludes courts missing data on cases awaiting trialr Revised i Incomplete data

Page 242: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 17 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDICIAL POSITION

TOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 675 670 3.8 3.8 176.0 173.8 903.5 898.3 r

ALAMEDA COUNTY 43.0 42.3 34 33 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.3 44.9 45.3ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.1 2.1 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 5.0FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.5 6.4 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 4.0 3.3 3 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 4.3 4.3 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 17.0 17.0 14 14 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 18.0 17.9 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 9.6

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0

BUTTE COUNTY 4.0 4.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.7NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.4

2 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.3 39 CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.9

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 18.0 18.0 14 14 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 19.6 18.8BAY MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.5 6.2 DELTA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.7 3.6 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.2 4.9 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.2 4.1

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.0 r

FRESNO COUNTY 20.0 20.0 18 18 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 20.7 20.7CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 8.2FRESNO MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 12.6 12.5

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.1

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 5.8 4.8 5 4 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.1 r

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 243: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 17 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDICIAL POSITION

TOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 675 670 3.8 3.8 176.0 173.8 903.5 898.3 r

KERN COUNTY 21.0 19.0 17 15 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 20.9 19.8BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 11.1 10.8 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.2 3.1 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 4.0 3.0 3 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.1 3.5 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 3.0 2.0 3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.4

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.7

LAKE COUNTYLAKE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.0

LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 259.0 258.0 190 189 0.0 0.0 69.0 69.0 282.1 279.9ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.2 4.1

2 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.6 6.5 40 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 5.2 5.2 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.4 3.2 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 10.0 9.0 8 7 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 11.1 11.0 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.2 CULVER MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.4 3.4 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 7.5 7.3 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 7.3 7.1 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.1 5.5 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 6 6 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 9.5 9.3 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 13.0 13.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 12.6 13.4 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 112.0 112.0 89 89 0.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 122.3 120.7LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 5.9 5.9 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.1 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.7 6.4 POMONA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 6.9 7.5 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.6 6.3 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.4 4.4 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 11.5 11.7 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 9.8 10.0 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.3 6.1

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.9

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.5

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 244: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 17 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDICIAL POSITION

TOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 675 670 3.8 3.8 176.0 173.8 903.5 898.3 r

MARIPOSA COUNTYMARIPOSA MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8

MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.1 r

MERCED COUNTYMERCED MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 5.3 5.3

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.6

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

MONTEREY COUNTYMONTEREY MUNICIPAL 11.0 11.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 11.0 11.1

NAPA COUNTY

2 NAPA MUNICIPAL 3.0 4.0 2 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.6 4.3 41 NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 3.3

ORANGE COUNTY 62.0 60.0 47 47 0.0 0.0 15.0 13.0 63.8 61.9CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 15.0 15.0 13 13 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 14.9 15.1 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 16.0 15.0 12 12 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 16.5 15.5 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL 10.0 10.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 10.2 9.8 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 9.0 8.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 5.0 4.0 9.4 8.6 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 12.8 12.9

PLACER COUNTYPLACER MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.5 5.4

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 i 1.0

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 32.0 32.0 22 22 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 33.7 33.1DESERT MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 8.1 7.7 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 5.8 5.8 rTHREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 4.4 4.6 rWESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 15.4 15.0

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 23.0 22.5 17 17 0.0 0.0 6.0 5.5 25.3 25.8SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 22.0 21.5 16 16 0.0 0.0 6.0 5.5 24.3 24.7 rSOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1

SAN BENITO COUNTYSAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 34.0 34.0 30 30 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 35.3 35.6

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 245: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 17 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDICIAL POSITION

TOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 675 670 3.8 3.8 176.0 173.8 903.5 898.3 r

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 71.0 71.0 56 56 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 74.5 73.6EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 12.0 12.0 10 10 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 12.4 12.5 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 11 11 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 14.5 14.2 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 36.0 36.0 28 28 0.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 38.2 37.5 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 9.4 9.4

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTYSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 24.0 24.0 20 20 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 26.0 25.3

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 14.0 14.0 12 12 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 14.4 14.3LODI MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 2.1 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.1 4.1 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 8.0 8.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 8.1 8.1

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 5 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 6.2

2 SAN MATEO COUNTY42 SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 14.0 14.0 9 9 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 16.7 17.1

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 13.0 12.0 9 8 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 12.6 12.5NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 7.0 6.0 5 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.3 6.1SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.3 6.4

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 40.0 40.0 35 35 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 40.9 41.2

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 7.0 7.0 5 5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.3 7.6

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 5.4

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 r

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 3.0 3.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.9

SOLANO COUNTY 10.0 10.0 7 7 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 10.5NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 6.0 6.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.4 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 4.0 4.0 3 3 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.1

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 6 6 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 9.1 9.4

STANISLAUS COUNTYSTANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 9.0 9.0 8 8 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 9.5 9.2

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.0

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 246: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTS TABLE 17 NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED JUDICIAL POSITIONS

AND JUDICIAL POSITION EQUIVALENTSAS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

JUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDICIAL POSITION

TOTAL JUDGES REFEREES COMMISSIONERS EQUIVALENTS

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 6/30/97 6/30/96 1996–97 1995–96

STATE TOTAL 854.8 847.6 675 670 3.8 3.8 176.0 173.8 903.5 898.3 r

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 1.0 1.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 i 0.9

TULARE COUNTYTULARE MUNICIPAL 10.0 10.0 9 9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 10.1 10.5 r

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.8

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 13.0 13.0 12 12 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 14.7 14.8

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 5.0 5.0 4 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.2 5.4

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 2.0 2.0 2 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0

243

r Revised i Incomplete data

Page 247: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 18 FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

FELONIES MISDEMEANORS</= 30 </= 45 </= 90 > 90 </= 30 </= 90 </= 120 > 120

Days Days Days Days Days Days Days DaysCOUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 98 100 0

STATE TOTAL 62 73 87 13 74 89 92 8

ALAMEDA COUNTY 58 69 84 16 69 84 87 13ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 61 70 83 17 81 89 90 10 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 56 65 84 16 81 90 92 8 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 59 65 78 22 55 78 83 17 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 48 61 81 19 55 74 78 22 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 60 72 87 13 66 83 87 13 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 55 64 81 19 75 85 88 12

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 35 41 53 47 21 64 70 30

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 31 39 61 39 29 63 69 31

BUTTE COUNTY 49 58 78 22 65 84 88 12

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 78 86 95 5 64 84 88 12 44 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 46 56 77 23 66 84 87 13

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 68 76 88 13 61 82 86 14

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 63 74 95 5 74 93 96 4

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 46 62 82 18 64 86 91 9BAY MUNICIPAL 53 66 83 17 65 82 88 12 DELTA MUNICIPAL 46 65 84 16 48 79 87 13 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 36 51 79 21 78 93 95 5 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 47 64 87 13 60 89 94 6

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 46 63 85 15 71 85 92 8

FRESNO COUNTY 53 i 68 i 87 i 13 i 83 i 96 i 97 i 3 iCENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iFRESNO MUNICIPAL 53 68 87 13 83 96 97 3

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 64 81 94 6 56 83 87 13

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 33 56 80 20 39 75 84 16

i Incomplete data

Page 248: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 18 FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

FELONIES MISDEMEANORS</= 30 </= 45 </= 90 > 90 </= 30 </= 90 </= 120 > 120

Days Days Days Days Days Days Days DaysCOUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 98 100 0

STATE TOTAL 62 73 87 13 74 89 92 8

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 5 12 55 45 67 85 89 11

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 59 78 92 8 54 80 95 5

KERN COUNTY 76 82 88 12 82 91 93 7BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 77 82 87 13 84 92 93 7 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 76 83 91 9 78 90 92 8 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 74 81 88 12 74 86 89 11 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 78 84 91 9 83 94 95 5

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 68 77 87 13 54 75 79 21

2 LAKE COUNTY45 LAKE MUNICIPAL 29 43 67 33 62 81 86 14

LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 49 63 92 8 55 84 92 8

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 70 78 88 12 82 93 95 5ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 64 72 84 16 74 90 93 7 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 80 86 94 6 76 91 94 6 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 62 72 86 14 62 80 85 15 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 53 64 78 22 65 86 90 10 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 78 84 91 9 86 93 94 6 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 63 71 84 16 72 89 93 7 CULVER MUNICIPAL 59 67 80 20 73 85 88 12 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 81 87 95 5 84 94 96 4 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 72 76 86 14 80 92 94 6 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 59 70 84 16 73 92 95 5 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 68 76 84 16 87 95 97 3 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 70 79 89 11 85 94 96 4 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 72 79 89 11 87 96 98 2 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 77 83 91 9 81 93 95 5 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 36 48 63 37 73 85 89 11 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 66 78 88 12 75 92 95 5 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 60 68 79 21 62 79 84 16 POMONA MUNICIPAL 87 91 96 4 89 95 96 4 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 80 85 89 11 82 94 96 4 SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 69 74 84 16 84 93 95 5

i Incomplete data

Page 249: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 18 FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

FELONIES MISDEMEANORS</= 30 </= 45 </= 90 > 90 </= 30 </= 90 </= 120 > 120

Days Days Days Days Days Days Days DaysCOUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 98 100 0

STATE TOTAL 62 73 87 13 74 89 92 8

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 56 64 78 22 72 89 92 8 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 45 61 87 13 79 92 95 5 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 77 81 88 12 82 92 95 5 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 75 81 90 10 63 83 88 12

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 57 i 71 i 89 i 11 i 60 i 88 i 97 i 3 i

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 33 48 77 23 41 71 77 23

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MARIPOSA MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iMENDOCINO COUNTY

2 MENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 43 55 77 23 65 84 90 10 46 MERCED COUNTYMERCED MUNICIPAL 35 45 66 34 34 62 67 33

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 38 46 83 17 57 90 93 7

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 55 70 90 10 67 92 96 4

MONTEREY COUNTYMONTEREY MUNICIPAL 80 90 97 3 75 94 97 3

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 52 75 91 9 82 96 98 2

ORANGE COUNTY 58 i 68 i 81 i 19 i 72 88 92 8CENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 61 71 86 14 74 89 92 8 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 64 74 86 14 80 93 96 4 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i 69 88 91 9 SOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 58 68 81 19 61 83 89 11 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 45 55 69 31 68 84 88 12

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 41 55 81 19 58 79 85 15

i Incomplete data

Page 250: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 18 FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

FELONIES MISDEMEANORS</= 30 </= 45 </= 90 > 90 </= 30 </= 90 </= 120 > 120

Days Days Days Days Days Days Days DaysCOUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 98 100 0

STATE TOTAL 62 73 87 13 74 89 92 8

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 52 i 64 i 80 i 20 i 63 i 88 i 92 i 8 i

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 69 i 79 i 89 i 11 i 71 i 86 i 90 i 10 iDESERT MUNICIPAL 44 65 80 20 60 78 85 15 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 64 i 79 i 92 i 8 i 68 i 81 i 84 i 16 iTHREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 77 i 84 i 94 i 6 i 76 i 89 i 90 i 10 iWESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 79 85 92 8 78 92 95 5

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 48 62 83 17 61 83 88 12SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 48 62 83 17 60 82 87 13 SOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 67 100 100 0 73 95 97 3

SAN BENITO COUNTY

2 SAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 57 76 94 6 75 94 97 3 47 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 75 86 93 7 76 89 94 6

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 74 84 95 5 78 93 96 4EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 79 89 97 3 81 96 97 3 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 72 83 96 4 73 94 97 3 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 67 79 93 7 78 91 95 5 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 88 94 99 1 88 97 98 2

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTYSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 33 47 72 28 35 72 80 20

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 69 77 89 11 79 89 91 9LODI MUNICIPAL 71 80 91 9 75 89 91 9 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 54 68 86 14 69 81 83 17 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 73 80 89 11 82 92 93 7

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 79 88 97 3 69 92 96 4

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 68 77 91 9 66 89 93 7

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 50 66 89 11 76 93 97 3NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 51 69 92 8 81 94 96 4 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 50 65 87 13 71 92 97 3

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 43 59 83 17 82 93 95 5

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 66 78 91 9 70 90 94 6

i Incomplete data

Page 251: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 18 FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

FELONIES MISDEMEANORS</= 30 </= 45 </= 90 > 90 </= 30 </= 90 </= 120 > 120

Days Days Days Days Days Days Days DaysCOUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 98 100 0

STATE TOTAL 62 73 87 13 74 89 92 8

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 56 72 86 14 74 88 90 10

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 55 79 97 3 81 97 99 1

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 52 69 92 8 72 91 95 5

SOLANO COUNTY 81 i 91 i 99 i 1 i 70 i 93 i 95 i 5 iNORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iVALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 81 91 99 1 70 93 95 5

SONOMA COUNTYSONOMA MUNICIPAL 46 60 85 15 41 73 83 17

2 STANISLAUS COUNTY48 STANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 56 84 88 12 70 89 92 8

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 72 85 96 4 69 93 96 4

TEHAMATEHAMA MUNICIPAL 47 61 88 12 63 90 93 7

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 34 i 60 i 88 i 12 i 37 i 70 i 88 i 12 i

TULARE COUNTYTULARE MUNICIPAL 57 73 88 12 37 52 58 42

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 54 66 86 14 68 90 95 5

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 70 81 94 6 71 93 96 4

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 32 44 65 35 49 73 86 14

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 35 49 74 26 27 55 63 37

i Incomplete data

Page 252: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 19 CIVIL CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

GENERAL CIVIL UNLAWFUL DETAINERS SMALL CLAIMS – IN COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS – OUT OF COUNTY

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 30 </= 45 > 45 </= 70 </= 90 > 90 </= 70 </= 90 > 90Months Months Months Months Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0

STATE TOTAL 76 85 89 11 49 68 32 78 88 12 68 79 21

ALAMEDA COUNTY 82 87 89 11 50 72 28 69 78 22 58 69 31ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL 65 72 76 24 53 78 22 70 85 15 59 72 28 BERKELEY-ALBANY MUNICIPAL 72 87 92 8 36 52 48 74 86 14 66 83 17 FREMONT-NEWARK-UNION CITY MUNICIPAL 80 81 82 18 39 50 50 47 53 47 25 34 66 LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON-DUBLIN MUNICIPAL 76 85 90 10 46 67 33 72 84 16 63 78 22 OAKLAND-PIEDMONT-EMERYVILLE MUNICIPAL 91 97 99 1 51 77 23 76 86 14 70 82 18 SAN LEANDRO-HAYWARD MUNICIPAL 85 92 95 5 59 81 19 81 89 11 70 81 19

ALPINE COUNTYALPINE MUNICIPAL 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 54 100 0 0 0 0

AMADOR COUNTYAMADOR MUNICIPAL 99 100 100 0 46 68 32 83 95 5 0 0 0

BUTTE COUNTY 92 97 98 2 59 74 26 74 85 15 66 81 19

2 NORTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 93 98 99 1 58 77 23 73 84 16 65 81 19 49 SOUTH BUTTE MUNICIPAL 88 92 95 5 59 71 29 77 86 14 78 78 22

CALAVERAS COUNTYCALAVERAS MUNICIPAL 88 94 97 3 60 82 18 76 84 16 79 84 16

COLUSA COUNTYCOLUSA MUNICIPAL 88 100 100 0 50 86 14 68 82 18 82 91 9

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 88 90 91 9 42 63 37 64 79 21 54 67 33BAY MUNICIPAL 88 90 90 10 39 64 36 62 72 28 52 62 38 DELTA MUNICIPAL 96 99 99 1 53 74 26 75 88 12 66 82 18 MT. DIABLO MUNICIPAL 81 84 85 15 36 53 47 48 70 30 37 56 44 WALNUT CREEK-DANVILLE MUNICIPAL 95 99 99 1 43 62 38 73 88 12 77 86 14

DEL NORTE COUNTYDEL NORTE MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i

EL DORADO COUNTYEL DORADO MUNICIPAL 76 83 85 15 53 67 33 77 89 11 70 86 14

FRESNO COUNTY 96 i 99 i 100 i 0 i 66 i 78 i 22 i 9 i 80 i 20 i 4 i 19 i 81 iCENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iFRESNO MUNICIPAL 96 99 100 0 66 78 22 9 80 20 4 19 81

GLENN COUNTYGLENN MUNICIPAL 97 100 100 0 51 72 28 83 88 12 74 80 20

HUMBOLDT COUNTYHUMBOLDT MUNICIPAL 71 77 79 21 38 53 47 83 91 9 50 63 38

i Incomplete data

Page 253: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 19 CIVIL CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

GENERAL CIVIL UNLAWFUL DETAINERS SMALL CLAIMS – IN COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS – OUT OF COUNTY

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 30 </= 45 > 45 </= 70 </= 90 > 90 </= 70 </= 90 > 90Months Months Months Months Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0

STATE TOTAL 76 85 89 11 49 68 32 78 88 12 68 79 21

IMPERIAL COUNTYIMPERIAL MUNICIPAL 87 91 94 6 70 82 18 87 94 6 0 0 0

INYO COUNTYINYO MUNICIPAL 95 99 100 0 27 88 13 83 94 6 100 100 0

KERN COUNTY 91 96 98 2 60 79 21 75 96 4 51 89 11BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL 91 97 99 1 67 86 14 76 98 2 45 90 10 EAST KERN MUNICIPAL 89 94 96 4 40 58 42 81 90 10 62 79 21 NORTH KERN MUNICIPAL 92 96 97 3 27 41 59 51 81 19 56 90 10 SOUTH KERN MUNICIPAL 81 93 96 4 28 58 42 90 95 5 81 89 11

KINGS COUNTYKINGS MUNICIPAL 86 91 93 7 67 80 20 93 98 2 89 96 4

2 LAKE COUNTY50 LAKE MUNICIPAL 84 90 91 9 49 74 26 58 67 33 62 72 28

LASSEN COUNTYLASSEN MUNICIPAL 97 98 100 0 75 91 9 84 90 10 77 94 6

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 61 73 80 20 40 59 41 79 84 16 74 81 19ALHAMBRA MUNICIPAL 49 57 61 39 47 73 27 85 89 11 73 80 20 ANTELOPE MUNICIPAL 90 96 97 3 51 73 27 69 80 20 67 76 24 BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL 45 60 69 31 36 61 39 48 54 46 42 48 52 BURBANK MUNICIPAL 73 80 85 15 50 69 31 50 54 46 54 55 45 CITRUS MUNICIPAL 88 95 98 2 64 79 21 82 90 10 77 84 16 COMPTON MUNICIPAL 68 77 86 14 34 51 49 52 63 37 32 39 61 CULVER MUNICIPAL 44 51 58 42 44 65 35 78 85 15 68 80 20 DOWNEY MUNICIPAL 82 93 97 3 51 74 26 89 96 4 86 93 7 EAST LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 43 52 57 43 38 60 40 83 89 11 76 81 19 GLENDALE MUNICIPAL 57 73 79 21 49 70 30 72 80 20 66 74 26 INGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL 58 66 80 20 37 60 40 76 83 17 58 74 26 LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL 71 84 98 2 53 75 25 85 92 8 76 86 14 LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL 55 69 77 23 35 51 49 82 87 13 76 82 18 LOS CERRITOS MUNICIPAL 85 93 97 3 59 80 20 93 97 3 82 91 9 MALIBU MUNICIPAL 79 90 95 5 34 57 43 68 78 22 46 58 42 NEWHALL MUNICIPAL 53 58 61 39 40 55 45 66 75 25 43 46 54 PASADENA MUNICIPAL 51 60 67 33 34 53 47 74 80 20 75 83 17 POMONA MUNICIPAL 91 97 100 0 47 71 29 91 98 2 79 91 9 RIO HONDO MUNICIPAL 72 88 94 6 58 82 18 77 79 21 70 73 27

i Incomplete data

Page 254: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 19 CIVIL CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

GENERAL CIVIL UNLAWFUL DETAINERS SMALL CLAIMS – IN COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS – OUT OF COUNTY

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 30 </= 45 > 45 </= 70 </= 90 > 90 </= 70 </= 90 > 90Months Months Months Months Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0

STATE TOTAL 76 85 89 11 49 68 32 78 88 12 68 79 21

LOS ANGELES COUNTY (continued)SANTA ANITA MUNICIPAL 77 88 93 7 47 69 31 85 91 9 73 83 17 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL 36 43 46 54 42 64 36 64 69 31 69 81 19 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 87 96 98 2 49 69 31 97 98 2 88 93 7 SOUTHEAST MUNICIPAL 60 74 83 17 38 66 34 65 67 33 53 56 44 WHITTIER MUNICIPAL 77 83 86 14 58 82 18 91 96 4 85 91 9

MADERA COUNTYMADERA MUNICIPAL 70 i 76 i 78 i 22 i 69 i 80 i 20 i 83 i 87 i 13 i 77 i 80 i 20 i

MARIN COUNTYMARIN MUNICIPAL 88 95 97 3 45 64 36 78 90 10 62 77 23

MARIPOSA COUNTY

2 MARIPOSA MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i51 MENDOCINO COUNTYMENDOCINO MUNICIPAL 95 98 99 1 70 82 18 76 86 14 70 80 20

MERCED COUNTYMERCED MUNICIPAL 96 99 100 0 69 90 10 86 94 6 9 29 71

MODOC COUNTYMODOC MUNICIPAL 94 100 100 0 14 71 29 93 97 3 0 0 0

MONO COUNTYMONO MUNICIPAL 72 81 97 3 42 56 44 13 53 47 54 62 38

MONTEREY COUNTYMONTEREY MUNICIPAL 96 97 99 1 87 87 13 81 92 8 73 88 12

NAPA COUNTYNAPA MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i

NEVADA COUNTYNEVADA MUNICIPAL 88 95 97 3 68 80 20 83 89 11 75 87 13

ORANGE COUNTY 87 i 95 i 97 i 3 i 46 i 69 i 31 i 90 i 95 i 5 i 80 i 89 i 11 iCENTRAL ORANGE MUNICIPAL 88 94 95 5 54 91 9 92 96 4 82 92 8 NORTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 84 94 96 4 29 49 51 87 93 7 79 88 12 ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iSOUTH ORANGE MUNICIPAL 93 98 99 1 53 72 28 90 96 4 73 85 15 WEST ORANGE MUNICIPAL 86 96 99 1 57 73 27 89 93 7 83 87 13

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY MUNICIPAL 81 90 92 8 58 78 22 78 86 14 68 83 17

PLUMAS COUNTYPLUMAS MUNICIPAL 89 96 96 4 50 73 27 48 76 24 17 75 25

i Incomplete data

Page 255: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 19 CIVIL CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

GENERAL CIVIL UNLAWFUL DETAINERS SMALL CLAIMS – IN COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS – OUT OF COUNTY

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 30 </= 45 > 45 </= 70 </= 90 > 90 </= 70 </= 90 > 90Months Months Months Months Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0

STATE TOTAL 76 85 89 11 49 68 32 78 88 12 68 79 21

RIVERSIDE COUNTY 89 i 95 i 98 i 2 i 62 81 19 i 92 i 96 i 4 i 90 i 94 i 6 iDESERT MUNICIPAL 84 91 96 4 45 71 29 92 98 2 84 95 5 MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL 90 i 96 i 98 i 2 i 49 i 72 i 28 i 84 i 91 i 9 i 72 i 81 i 19 iTHREE LAKES MUNICIPAL 84 i 94 i 96 i 4 i 50 i 76 i 24 i 60 i 66 i 34 i 43 i 48 i 52 iWESTERN RIVERSIDE MUNICIPAL 93 97 99 1 67 84 16 95 98 2 95 98 2

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 92 i 96 i 99 i 1 i 32 i 59 i 41 i 91 i 96 i 4 i 71 i 92 i 8 iSACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — iSOUTH SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL 92 96 99 1 32 59 41 91 96 4 71 92 8

SAN BENITO COUNTY

2 SAN BENITO MUNICIPAL 90 95 96 4 56 80 20 96 98 2 97 97 3 52 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYSAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL 84 95 98 2 67 90 10 83 98 2 72 78 22

SAN DIEGO COUNTY 91 97 98 2 61 80 20 89 94 6 79 88 12EL CAJON MUNICIPAL 89 95 97 3 70 91 9 92 96 4 85 93 7 NORTH COUNTY MUNICIPAL 90 97 98 2 58 78 22 92 96 4 85 94 6 SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL 94 99 99 1 67 85 15 85 93 7 71 82 18 SOUTH BAY MUNICIPAL 81 87 90 10 33 52 48 92 96 4 71 79 21

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTYSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL 87 96 99 1 36 53 47 21 77 23 18 72 28

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 87 93 96 4 66 86 14 82 89 11 76 82 18LODI MUNICIPAL 89 95 97 3 78 91 9 90 94 6 83 88 12 MANTECA-RIPON-ESCALON-TRACY MUNICIPAL 86 94 96 4 64 86 14 75 80 20 66 72 28 STOCKTON MUNICIPAL 87 93 95 5 64 84 16 83 90 10 81 90 10

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTYSAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL 72 76 77 23 51 64 36 79 88 12 79 88 12

SAN MATEO COUNTYSAN MATEO MUNICIPAL 90 96 97 3 23 61 39 82 90 10 77 87 13

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 89 95 97 3 46 78 22 90 95 5 78 89 11NORTH SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 94 98 99 1 33 82 18 93 97 3 82 92 8 SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL 85 93 96 4 62 74 26 87 93 7 75 87 13

SANTA CLARA COUNTYSANTA CLARA MUNICIPAL 78 88 99 1 57 74 26 67 100 0 0 0 0

i Incomplete data

Page 256: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

MUNICIPAL COURTSTABLE 19 CIVIL CASE-PROCESSING TIME

FISCAL YEAR 1996–97 (CASES FILED AFTER 1/1/91)

GENERAL CIVIL UNLAWFUL DETAINERS SMALL CLAIMS – IN COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS – OUT OF COUNTY

</= 12 </= 18 </= 24 > 24 </= 30 </= 45 > 45 </= 70 </= 90 > 90 </= 70 </= 90 > 90Months Months Months Months Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days Days

COUNTY AND JUDICIAL DISTRICT (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

CASE DISPOSITION TIME STANDARD 90 98 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0 90 100 0

STATE TOTAL 76 85 89 11 49 68 32 78 88 12 68 79 21

SANTA CRUZ COUNTYSANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL 94 97 98 2 27 41 59 67 76 24 65 75 25

SHASTA COUNTYSHASTA MUNICIPAL 88 88 90 10 64 83 17 66 71 29 65 72 28

SIERRA COUNTYSIERRA COUNTY MUNICIPAL 100 100 100 0 63 100 0 100 100 0 100 100 0

SISKIYOU COUNTYSISKIYOU MUNICIPAL 93 97 97 3 54 73 27 82 90 10 38 50 50

SOLANO COUNTY 85 96 99 1 54 75 25 79 91 9 68 86 14NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL 81 94 98 2 50 69 31 78 89 11 67 82 18 VALLEJO-BENICIA MUNICIPAL 91 97 99 1 57 80 20 81 93 7 68 88 12

2 SONOMA COUNTY53 SONOMA MUNICIPAL 87 94 96 4 57 76 24 90 96 4 77 86 14

STANISLAUS COUNTYSTANISLAUS MUNICIPAL 66 86 92 8 63 69 31 74 80 20 66 74 26

SUTTER COUNTYSUTTER MUNICIPAL 93 97 98 2 80 92 8 77 81 19 71 76 24

TEHAMA COUNTYTEHAMA MUNICIPAL 90 94 96 4 67 82 18 69 75 25 53 58 42

TRINITY COUNTYTRINITY MUNICIPAL 78 i 96 i 96 i 4 i 40 i 50 i 50 i 76 i 93 i 7 i 0 i 0 i 0 i

TULARE COUNTYTULARE MUNICIPAL 89 93 95 5 64 75 25 64 83 17 55 79 21

TUOLUMNE COUNTYTUOLUMNE MUNICIPAL 89 96 99 1 61 77 23 42 52 48 37 42 58

VENTURA COUNTYVENTURA MUNICIPAL 97 99 99 1 67 79 21 84 91 9 76 88 12

YOLO COUNTYYOLO MUNICIPAL 78 97 99 1 67 95 5 79 94 6 73 92 8

YUBA COUNTYYUBA MUNICIPAL 90 96 96 4 80 92 8 82 90 10 73 91 9

i Incomplete data

Page 257: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS WITH INCOMPLETE DATAFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

SUPERIOR COURTS MISSING REPORTS

ALAMEDA: Calendar Reports for March through June 1997Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

AMADOR: Calendar Report for fiscal years 1995–96 and 1996–97Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

CALAVERAS: Calendar Report for fiscal years 1995–96 and 1996–97Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97Judicial Position Report for fiscal year 1995–96

FRESNO: Addendum 1D for fiscal year 1996–97

GLENN: Calendar Report for January through May 1997Summary Report for January through May 1997Judicial Position Report for 4th quarter of fiscal year 1995–96

HUMBOLDT: Calendar Report for September through May 1997Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97Judicial Position Report for 2nd through 4th quarter of fiscal year 1995–96

IMPERIAL: Summary Report for May and June 1997Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

INYO: Report of Assistance for fiscal year 1996–97Judicial Position Report for fiscal year 1995–96

KERN: Addendum 1D for January through March 1997

LOS ANGELES: Addendum 1D for fiscal year 1996–97

MARIN: Calendar Report for March and April 1996

MARIPOSA: Addendum 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

MENDOCINO: Calendar Report for March through June 1997Addendum 1D and 1E for March through June 1997Summary Report for March through June 1997Judicial Position Report for fiscal year 1995–96

Page 258: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS WITH INCOMPLETE DATAFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

SUPERIOR COURTS MISSING REPORTS (continued)

NAPA: Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

PLACER: Addendum 1D for fiscal year 1996–97Judicial Position Report for fiscal year 1995–96

SAN FRANCISCO: Addendum 1E for fiscal year 1996–97Summary Report for fiscal year 1996–97Where data are incomplete, the tables are footnoted.

STANISLAUS: Addendum 1D and 1E for fiscal year 1996–97

TRINITY: Summary Report for October 1996 through June 1997Calendar Report for October 1996 through June 1997Addendum 1D and 1E for October 1996 through June 1997Report of Assistance for October 1996 through June 1997Judicial Position Report for 2nd through 4th quarter of fiscal year 1996–97

VENTURA: Addendum 1D for fiscal year 1996–97

MUNICIPAL COURTS MISSING REPORTS

AMADOR MUNICIPAL: Report of Assistance for fiscal year 1995–96

DEL NORTE MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996–97

CENTRAL VALLEY MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996–97

MADERA MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996–97 (Madera district only)

MARIPOSA MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996–97

NAPA MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996–97

Page 259: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

COURTS WITH INCOMPLETE DATAFISCAL YEARS 1995–96 AND 1996–97

MUNICIPAL COURTS MISSING REPORTS (continued)

ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR Form 2C for fiscal year 1996-97MUNICIPAL: Where data are incomplete, the tables are footnoted.

PLUMAS MUNICIPAL: Summary Report for November 1995 through October 1996Report of Assistance for July through September 1996Form 2C for July through October 1996

MT. SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for December 1996 through June 1997

THREE LAKES MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for October 1996 through June 1997

NORTHERN SOLANO MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for fiscal year 1996-97Where data are incomplete, the tables are footnoted.

TRINITY MUNICIPAL: Form 2C for December 1996Report of Assistance for December 1996; February, May, and June 1997Judicial Position Report for 4th quarter of fiscal year 1996–97

YUBA MUNICIPAL: Judicial Position Report for 1st quarter of fiscal year 1995–96

Under regulations adopted pursuant to the Chief Justice’s constitutional authority (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 6), California trial courts are required tosubmit the Summary Report, Calendar Report, Addendum 1D and 1E Reports, Form 2C, and Report of Assistance to the Judicial Council on amonthly basis. Judicial Position Reports are required each quarter. Summary Reports contain case filing and disposition data. Calendar Reportsinclude data on the number of cases set for trial in superior courts. Form 2C is used to report the number of cases awaiting trial in municipal courts.Addendum Reports and Form 2C are used to calculate case-processing time for the superior and municipal courts respectively. The Report ofAssistance and Judicial Position Report are used to calculate judicial position equivalents.

Page 260: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

GLOSSARIES

Page 261: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings.Proceedings concerning possible sus-pension, disbarment, and public or pri-vate reproval of attorneys for allegedviolations of law or rules of profession-al conduct. Recommendations of theState Bar are reviewed by the SupremeCourt as a matter of course. Alsoinclude proceedings in which opinionswere issued on petitions by attorneysfor full review of State Bar recom-mendations and on petitions for rein-statement from previously disbarredattorneys. Supreme Court practice as toreview of the State Bar’s recommen-dations is changing.

Automatic Appeal. Criminal appeal byoperation of law directly from a superi-or court to the Supreme Court uponimposition of a death penalty sentence.

Civil. An appeal or original proceedingconcerning a case that is neither acriminal nor a juvenile delinquencyproceeding.

Criminal. An appeal or original pro-ceeding related to a case charging theviolation of criminal law.

Original Proceedings.Petitions forwrits within the Supreme Court’s origi-nal jurisdiction. The most commontypes are mandamus and prohibition,which may relate to either civil orcriminal matters, and habeas corpus.

Petition for Review.Request forSupreme Court review of a Court ofAppeal decision.

Petition for Review Denied. Order bythe Supreme Court declining review ofa Court of Appeal decision.

Petition for Review Granted.Order bythe Supreme Court granting review of aCourt of Appeal decision.

Petition for Review Granted andHeld. Order by the Supreme Courtgranting review of a Court of Appealdecision that will be held until a leadcase addressing a related issue has beendecided by the Supreme Court.

Petition for Review Granted andTransferred. Order by the SupremeCourt granting review of a Court ofAppeal decision but transferring reviewof the case to a Court of Appeal withoutadditional action by the Supreme Court.

Request for Publication orDepublication. A case in which thesole relief requested is for the Supreme Court to order a Court ofAppeal decision to be either publishedor depublished.

Written Opinion. The written decision,with reasons stated, that determines the outcome of a Supreme Court case.For each case or group of consolidatedcases, only one opinion is reported inthese tables. Concurring and dissentingopinions are not included.

SUPREME COURT GLOSSARY

261

The definitions provided in this glossary are intended only to provide context and a general understanding of the informationcontained in this publication. These definitions are not to be relied on as legal authority or cited as authoritative.

Page 262: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Appeal. A proceeding for direct reviewof a judgment or appealable order of atrial court. Excludes collateral reviewby means of an original proceeding.(See Civil Appeal andCriminalAppeal.)

Civil Appeal. An appeal in a case thatis neither a criminal nor a juveniledelinquency proceeding.

Civil Original Proceeding. Any origi-nal proceeding in which the underlyingcase does not relate to a violation ofcriminal law.

Court of Appeal. The California courtthat hears appeals in all cases in whicha superior court has original jurisdic-tion, except capital cases, and appeals inother special circumstances as pre-scribed by law.

Criminal Appeal. An appeal from thejudgment or order in a case charging aviolation of criminal law.

Criminal Original Proceeding. Anyoriginal proceeding in which the under-lying case is related to a violation ofcriminal law.

Disposition. Termination of an appealor original proceeding. Court of Appealdispositions are either by written opin-ion or without opinion with or withoutrecord filed.

Fully Briefed. A pending appeal inwhich all briefs have been filed.

Median Time. In a listing where timevalues are placed in order from shortestto longest, the value with half the casesabove and half the cases below it.

Ninetieth Percentile Time.In a listingwhere time values are placed in orderfrom shortest to longest, the value with10 percent of the cases above and 90percent below it.

Notice Filed.The filing of a Notice ofAppeal in the superior court, therebyinitiating the appellate process.

Notice of Appeal. The document filedin a trial court that begins an appeal to aCourt of Appeal.

Original Proceedings. Cases com-menced in an appellate court, common-ly called “writ proceedings.” The mostcommon are writs of mandamus andprohibition, usually seeking an orderaddressed to a lower court, and writs ofhabeas corpus, usually addressed to aperson holding another in official cus-tody. (See Civil Original Proceedingand Criminal Original Proceeding.)

Pending Appeal. An appeal awaitingdecision.

Record Filed. The filing of the trialcourt clerk’s transcript (copies of docu-ments filed in the case) and thereporter’s transcript (typed version oforal proceedings).

COURTS OF APPEAL GLOSSARY

262

The definitions provided in this glossary are intended only to provide context and a general understanding of the informationcontained in this publication. These definitions are not to be relied on as legal authority or cited as authoritative.

Page 263: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Appeal.A proceeding for direct reviewof a civil or criminal judgment from amunicipal court, including small claimsmatters.

Cases Set for Trial. Civil and criminalcases for which trial dates have beenassigned.

Commissioner.A subordinate judicialofficer, employed by a county, who per-forms judicial or quasi-judicial dutiesassigned to him or her by a court. Acommissioner may be authorized todecide only limited pretrial issues offact and law or to conduct complete tri-als. Commissioners frequently act astemporary judges.

Contested Matter.Trial in which evi-dence was introduced by both sides.

Criminal. A defendant against whoman indictment, information, or a certifi-cation was filed. At least one chargeagainst the defendant must be a felonyin order for the case to be filed in supe-rior court. Some felonies, however, canbe disposed of as misdemeanors insuperior court.

Disposition.Termination of a proceed-ing. Civil dispositions before trialinclude transfers to another trial court,dismissals, summary judgments, andother judgments before trial. Criminaldispositions before trial include trans-fers to another trial court, sentencesafter pleas of guilty or no contest, anddismissals. Civil dispositions after trial

include judgments and dismissals.Criminal dispositions after trial includeacquittals, grants of probation, and sen-tences after conviction.

Eminent Domain. The number ofparcels in a proceeding to take privateproperty for public use and determinethe amount of just compensation duethe owner.

Family Law. A proceeding in which a petition has been filed for dissolution or voiding of a marriage or for legalseparation.

Felony. Criminal case alleging anoffense punishable by imprisonment ina state prison or by death.

Filings in Civil Matters. The numberof civil cases for which complaints havebeen filed.

Filings in Criminal and JuvenileMatters. The number of cases involv-ing defendants against whom criminalcharges have been filed.

Habeas Corpus. Petitions for writs ofhabeas corpus and coram nobis, peti-tions seeking release from illegalrestraint under Penal Code section1473, and petitions challenging involun-tary detention for treatment under theLanterman-Petris-Short Act. Habeascorpus may challenge either the legalityof confinement or the conditions underwhich a person is confined.

Judgeship. The judicial position withpower to exercise the full legal authori-ty of the court in which the judge sitsby selection or assignment. The numberof positions authorized by law, whetherfilled or vacant.

Judicial Position Equivalents.Esti-mate of the number of judicial officerswho were present and available to per-form court business. The numbersinclude authorized judgeships, adjustedto reflect judicial vacancies and assis-tance given to other courts; and assis-tance received from assigned judges,full-time and part-time referees andcommissioners, and temporary judgesserving by stipulation of the parties;they exclude assistance provided underblanket assignments.

Judicial Positions.The number ofjudgeships authorized by law, plusreferees and commissioners.

Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings.The number of petitions filed underWelfare and Institutions Code section602 alleging violation of a criminalstatute, and the number of petitionsfiled under Welfare and InstitutionsCode section 601, alleging that a minoris beyond the control of parents orguardians but has not violated any law.Prior to 1977 both sections were referredto as delinquency. An original petitioncommences a delinquency proceeding. Asubsequent petitionadds allegationsagainst a minor child who is alreadysubject to the court’s jurisdiction.

SUPERIOR COURTS GLOSSARY

263

The definitions provided in this glossary are intended only to provide context and a general understanding of the informationcontained in this publication. These definitions are not to be relied on as legal authority or cited as authoritative.

Page 264: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Juvenile Dependency Proceedings.The number of petitions filed underWelfare and Institutions Code section300 seeking to make a minor child award of the court because of abuse orneglect. An original petition com-mences a dependency proceeding. Asubsequent petitionadds allegationsregarding a minor child who is alreadysubject to the court’s jurisdiction.

Mental Health Proceedings.Selectedproceedings to detain a person under theLanterman-Petris-Short Act; proceed-ings to examine or detain a person as amentally retarded individual, a narcoticaddict, a mentally disordered prisoner at the time of parole or termination ofparole, and a mentally disordered sexoffender for a crime committed beforeJanuary 1, 1982; and proceedings todetermine the current sanity of a crimi-nal defendant.

Motor Vehicle Personal Injury, Death,and Property Damage.Actions fordamages in excess of $25,000 for physi-cal injury to persons and property, andactions for wrongful death related onlyto motor vehicle accidents. (The uppermonetary limit for filing in municipalcourt was changed from $15,000 to$25,000 on January 1, 1986.)

Other Civil Complaints. Cases notcovered in any other civil case category,including complaints filed by a privateparty to establish paternal relationship.If the requested relief is for money, itmust be in excess of $25,000 to be filedin superior court. (The upper monetarylimit for filing in municipal court waschanged from $15,000 to $25,000 onJanuary 1, 1986.)

Other Civil Petitions. Petitions foradoption; for change of name; to estab-lish the fact of birth or death (if not partof a pending probate proceeding); forwrits of review, mandate, and prohibi-tion; for conciliation (when not part of apending family law proceeding); peti-tions filed by the district attorneyagainst a parent responsible for childsupport reimbursement to the county;petitions filed under the ReciprocalEnforcement of Support Act; petitionsto prevent domestic violence; and otherspecial proceedings.

Personal Injury, Death, and PropertyDamage. All actions for damages inexcess of $25,000 for physical injury topersons and property, and actions forwrongful death excludingthose relatedto motor vehicle accidents. (The uppermonetary limit for filing in municipalcourt was changed from $15,000 to$25,000 on January 1, 1986.)

Probate and Guardianship. All probateproceedings, will contests, guardianshipand conservatorship proceedings (includ-ing conservatorship proceedings underthe Lanterman-Petris-Short Act), andpetitions to compromise minors’ claims(when not part of a pending action orproceeding).

Referee. Subordinate judicial officeremployed by a county, handling mattersassigned by the court such as traffic lawviolations.

Uncontested Matter. Trial in whichevidence was introduced by one sideonly.

SUPERIOR COURTS GLOSSARY(continued)

264

Page 265: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Cases Awaiting Trial.Civil and crimi-nal cases calendared for trial, and civilcases in which memoranda to set havebeen filed but no trial dates have beenassigned. Small claims cases areexcluded.

Civil. All civil matters with a value of$25,000 or less, except small claimsmatters.

Commissioner.A subordinate judicialofficer, employed by a county, who per-forms judicial or quasi-judicial dutiesassigned to him or her by a court. Acommissioner may be authorized todecide only limited pretrial issues offact and law or to conduct complete tri-als. Commissioners frequently act astemporary judges.

Contested Matter.Trial in which evi-dence was introduced by both sides.

Disposition.Termination of a proceed-ing. Civil dispositions before trialinclude dismissals, transfers, summaryjudgments, and other judgments beforetrial. Criminal dispositions before trialinclude bail forfeitures, dismissals,transfers to another trial court, and cer-tification of pleas of guilty to superiorcourt. Civil dispositions after trialinclude judgments and dismissals.Criminal dispositions after trial includeacquittals, dismissals, grants of proba-tion, sentences after conviction, andactions to hold defendants to answerfelony charges in the superior court.

Felony.Criminal case alleging anoffense punishable by imprisonment ina state prison or by death. Such casesare filed in municipal courts, whichconduct preliminary hearings to deter-mine whether there is sufficient evi-dence to hold the defendant to answerin superior court.

Filings in Civil Matters. The numberof civil cases for which complaints havebeen filed.

Filings in Criminal Matters. The num-ber of cases involving defendantsagainst whom criminal charges havebeen filed.

Group A Misdemeanors.Nontrafficmisdemeanor violations of the PenalCode and other state statutes, excludingFish and Game Code violations andintoxication complaints.

Group B Misdemeanors.Nontrafficmisdemeanor violations of local cityand county ordinances, Fish and GameCode violations, and intoxication com-plaints.

Group C Misdemeanors.Violations ofVehicle Code sections 20002 (hit andrun, property damage), 23104 (recklessdriving, causing injury), and 23152(driving under the influence of alcoholor drugs).

Group D Misdemeanors.All trafficmisdemeanor violations that are notincluded in the Group C misdemeanorcategory.

Illegal Parking. All violations of park-ing regulations established by statestatutes and local ordinances.

Judgeship.The judicial position withpower to exercise the full legal authori-ty of the court in which the judge sitsby selection or assignment. The numberof positions authorized by law, whetherfilled or vacant.

Judicial Position Equivalents.Esti-mate of the number of judicial officerswho were present and available toconduct court business. The numbersinclude authorized judgeships, adjustedto reflect judicial vacancies and assis-tance given to other courts; and assis-tance received from assigned judges,full-time and part-time commissionersand referees, and temporary judgesserving by stipulation of the parties;they exclude assistance provided underblanket assignments.

Judicial Positions.The number ofjudgeships authorized by law, plus referees and commissioners.

Juvenile Orders.Orders issued bymunicipal court judges and traffic hear-ing officers, designated by the superiorcourt pursuant to Welfare andInstitutions Code section 257, regardingnonfelony violations of law by minors.

MUNICIPAL COURTS GLOSSARY

265

The definitions provided in this glossary are intended only to provide context and a general understanding of the informationcontained in this publication. These definitions are not to be relied on as legal authority or cited as authoritative.

Page 266: 1998 ANNUAL REPORT VOLUME I - California Courts · 2019-05-08 · revised article VI was adopted and the provisions of former section 1(a) were amended and renumbered as section 6,

Nontraffic Infraction. Nontraffic viola-tion of state statutes or local city orcounty ordinances specified as infrac-tions.

Reduced to Misdemeanor.Case inwhich a charge originally filed as afelony is disposed of as a misdemeanor.

Referee.Subordinate judicial officeremployed by a county, handling mattersassigned by the court such as traffic lawviolations.

Small Claims.All matters filed in smallclaims court (value of $5,000 or less).(The jurisdictional limit increased from$2,500 to $5,000 effective January 1,1991.)

Traffic Infraction. Any traffic-relatedviolation of state statutes or city orcounty ordinances specified as infrac-tions, but excluding parking violations.

Uncontested Matter.Trial in whichevidence was introduced by one sideonly, including traffic matters in whichthe officer’s written statement or cita-tion is introduced in lieu of the officer’sappearance.

MUNICIPAL COURTS GLOSSARY(continued)

266