By: Bailey Zimmerly

The Cover-Up

The 1969 Moon Landing Conspiracy

was one of the most covered-up stories

in history. In Fact, most people of

today’s generation don’t even know the

first men to land on the moon is, none-

the-less knowing that the whole moon

landing could be a cover-up. This could

be one of the best, yet unfortunate

cover-ups in history.

The 1st Argument

Many top officials have said that all of the moon pictures don’t include stars in the background of the night sky.

Their response for that was that according to most professional photographers, that it is difficult to capture something very bright , like a star and something very dim, like the night sky from space in the same picture.

The 2nd Argument

In many of the pictures with the flag, it is waving and rippling in the background. As many people know, there is no wind on the moon.

NASA’s response to that is that in most of the pictures the astronauts are putting in the flag in so it has to be waving for them to put it in the hard ground.

Reasons For

In some cases you just can trump the human experience. From 1969-1972, 12 astronauts have landed on the moon. Nine of them are still alive today and have testified their experience. I don’t think that nine smart, well-trained astronauts would lie about such an amazing experience.

Moon Rocks Just as Colombus carried

back a few hundred natives back to Spain, Apollo astronauts brought 841 pounds of moon rock home.

Many people argue that the rocks could be from anywhere. However, these rocks contained elements that could only be found on a space mass that has little or no atmosphere.

1st Reason Against

Many people who covered the moon landing said that the picture and video quality was very poor. They say that the still pictures don’t match the video even though NASA said they were taken at the same time. Another argument with the video’s is that the video was shot from ahead so how could Neil Armstrong be the first man on the moon.

2nd Reason Against The second argument is that

many people say that the United States didn’t have the technology to land on the moon. Many of the computers were said to have very little power. Some even went as far to say that they had the energy equivalent to a kitchen appliance. This is probably not true, but the United States would need a lot of energy to land on the moon.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I think most of the reasons against the 1969 moon landing are very speculative. Therefore, I think the reasons for outweigh the reasons against. So, I think the moon landing of 1969 is real and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were the first men to land on the moon.

Works Cited " Google Image Result for http://consultorti.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/moon-landing-hoax-2.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010.

<http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://consultorti.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/moon-landing-hoax-2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://consultorti.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/hoax-lendas-urbanas/&usg=__nISP_CbVaV1Zw0w6eJEPKyCtoTM=&h=371&w=400&sz=40&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=EbA3xnjUVmgJyM:&tbnh=115&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmoon%2Blanding%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1>.

" Google Image Result for http://consultorti.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/moon-landing-hoax-2.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://consultorti.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/moon-landing-hoax-2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://consultorti.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/hoax-lendas-urbanas/&usg=__nISP_CbVaV1Zw0w6eJEPKyCtoTM=&h=371&w=400&sz=40&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=EbA3xnjUVmgJyM:&tbnh=115&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmoon%2Blanding%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1>.

" Google Image Result for http://falconsscience.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/neil_armstrong_pose.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://falconsscience.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/neil_armstrong_pose.jpg&imgrefurl=http://falconsscience.wordpress.com/year5/&usg=__6aP01nkz4BnuP1XK6mQRdbIPPnM=&h=2383&w=2016&sz=594&hl=en&start=2&sig2=fSxV0NqwM5YQGERl0MxdrA&um=1&tbnid=9fQN62pXujQpfM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dneil%2Barmstrong%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1&ei=6Z5hS6yDMJCQNZSgpJUM

" Google Image Result for http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/Images/StarChild/space_level2/apollo11_lem_big.gif." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/Images/StarChild/space_level2/apollo11_lem_big.gif&imgrefurl=http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/space_level2/apollo11_lem.html&usg=__sJPN28n7yCs41xOaih49wMc7DfA=&h=473&w=396&sz=109&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=KWM8xB0ubFBl2M:&tbnh=129&tbnw=108&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dapollo%2B11%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Dactive%26um%3D1>.

" Google Image Result for http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/public/planets/gif/ear/basalt.gif." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/public/planets/gif/ear/basalt.gif&imgrefurl=http://paleogeology.blogspot.com/2008_10_01_paleogeology_archive.html&usg=__2MIbCXh3XcDbihe2sueGdgNC3Pc=&h=462&w=627&sz=254&hl=en&start=10&sig2=dmy8FjvEQcPvNEt7ooRuHA&um=1&tbnid=PAsQPkBjHu9zuM:&tbnh=100&tbnw=136&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmoon%2Brocks%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1&ei=i55hS-KHApygMtrBiIMM>.

" Google Image Result for http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/apollo11/rocks.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/apollo11/rocks.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/apollo11/index.html&usg=__GNqOuj46Aai4b27owT81EeWUMds=&h=334&w=490&sz=54&hl=en&start=2&sig2=IFSXjyLP170s9zRhesdKGQ&um=1&tbnid=hIyrsvWYl8ZMYM:&tbnh=89&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmoon%2Brocks%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1&ei=i55hS-KHApygMtrBiIMM>.

Works Cited Continued

" Google Image Result for http://www.superlaugh.com/1/ebunny.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.superlaugh.com/1/ebunny.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.superlaugh.com/1/ebunny.htm&usg=__zCb3MNKljDwn-DYA-Wnu4H80Kp8=&h=214&w=178&sz=9&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=0grIbCocv3OOCM:&tbnh=106&tbnw=88&prev=/images%3Fq%3Denergizer%2Bbunny%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1>.

" Google Image Result for http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Astronauts/Buzz_Aldrin_002.jpg." Google Images. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/04images/Astronauts/Buzz_Aldrin_002.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Buzz_Aldrin_Disclosure.html&usg=__mWvo5tkeTl0MlvjWX9jP4LH4Rj0=&h=1020&w=800&sz=67&hl=en&start=3&sig2=Q08Wt3rTyGovycNRs2FLGQ&um=1&tbnid=jFga34w-x_PcSM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=118&prev=/images%3Fq%3DBuzz%2BAldrin%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Dactive%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26um%3D1&ei=DZ9hS4CJDpHUM-T53YcM>.

"Starts With A Bang." ScienceBlogs. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang

"The Great Moon Hoax." NASA - Science@NASA. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. <http://science.nasa.gov/headlines

way, the, one of Mr. Kaysing accusations is that Christa McAuliffe, would not go along with NASA's lie that stars cannot be seen in space. When she refused, NASA murdered the unfortunate Ms. McAuliffe, along with six others, expensive, and embarrassing failures in U.S. history. What proof does Mr. Kaysing give in support of this claim? None of course.. "The Moon Hoax Debate." www.braeunig.us. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2010. <http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax