17 november 2010 1 interoperability & cross acceptance paul maas inspector
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
17 November 2010
1
INTEROPERABILITY &Cross Acceptance
Paul MaasInspector
![Page 2: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Interoperability
Goals (high level):
easier authorisation process:
less national rules (and clearer) less time consuming (and clearer) less costs (single test when
possible) more predictable delivery of PITS
and keeping the same safety-level (at least)
![Page 3: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Interoperability
GOALS (lower level):
Harmonisation of rules (Ministries and NSA) Harmonisation of rules and hardware (IM) Transparent rules (no changes/derogations) Sharing the workload is possible (for NSA’s
and NoBo/DeBo’s) Testing as much as possible in test
centre/simulation
![Page 4: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cross Acceptance
HISTORY
Basis for CA starts in project at end 90’s but without legal basis
Task Force Interoperability (TFI: NSA’s of DACHINL) founder of complete system in 2007 with legal basis by MoU on 07 June 2007 (Luxembourg)
In 2006 bilateral agreement Germany – France for HS passenger trains based on the same principals
2008 ERA and NSA decide for CA in Europe 2009 EC decides for ERA task in CA
![Page 5: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cross Acceptance
Today's situation:
DACHINL 07-06-2007 MoU
D – F agreement 2006 and update 2008, renewal 2010?
BeNeFLuCh MoU on 22-12-2008
French agreements with Spain, Italy and Portugal
Luxemburg and Belgium project with Germany (running)
GIG with mid-south Europe
GIG with the Nordic and Germany
The Netherlands project with Check Republic (almost ready and now incorporating Germany)
The Netherlands project with Poland (starting up and extending with ERA to NePoCSkALiG means they don’t waite)
![Page 6: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TSI’s and ERA
-Cross Acceptance needed as intermediate for TSI’s and for existing rolling stock (in the next decades)
-TSI’s not complete (still: open points, interpretable!, no clear definitions, derogation possible)
When we don’t close this system soon and keep it closed it will be worse (in 5 or 10 years) then today's situation!(duty for ERA, NOBO’s, Manufacturer, RO and NSA’s)
![Page 7: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TSI’s and ERA
- ERA plans and pace doesn’t fit most NSA’s/IM’s so - planning must be agreed- Ministries have to realise that what is agreed they can handle in the ministry and at level of NSA/IM (personnel (number and knowledge) and for the cost)-Decision making in ERA not (always) clear or transparant
![Page 8: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Infrastucture Manager
What is effectively done by them in the last years to improve the Interoperability???
Did they clean up the rules? Did they make all the rules transparent? Did they harmonise anything? Is there a converge in hardware?
Exception: some IM’s because of ERTMS corridor!
![Page 9: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Manufacturers
The (bigger) manufacturers started to use Cross Acceptance where possible (with good help of IRL-database)
In every new RS-project better and more! The manufacturers are (often) too optimistic in their
planning (problems seem to arise at end of process, with the pressure on…)
For the TSI CCS EVERY ERTMS-manufacturer built there own simulation centre of a specific track! (€ x106)
Improvement: bring costs down heavily by organising that simulations (also remote) can be used on each others simulation- and test centres!
Next projects: - help yourself and NSA’s to make clear what is or is not covered by TSI’s and – make the translation in English
![Page 10: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Railway Undertaking
RU’s have already profited from Cross Acceptance and will even more in next future
RU’s have to realise that TSI’s have to be fulfilled: NO MORE interpretations and DEROGATIONS! (from 2day on!!)
RU together with Manufacturer responsible for realistic project planning
![Page 11: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NSA’s
Some NSA’s have invested heavily in Cross Acceptance
Some have done (almost next to) nothing
Some NSA’s/Ministries even make more and new rules!
Some NSA’s mostly unpredictable planning (depending on responsible employee; changes in staff, new questions, other questions, etc)
In some countries NSA-personnel self-responsible!
![Page 12: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NSA’s
Some ministries accept unknown UNSAFETY! by directly accepting authorised RS from an other country (IM does infracompatibility check without involvement NSA)
More NSA’s have so little budget that it isn’t possible anymore to act properly (task ministry?)
In the next 2-5 years (probably) all NSA have to face a big staff cut down (20 to 40%)
![Page 13: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
NSA’s and Ministeries
No Harmonisation yet for:
Process for technical checking (NOBO/DEBO or NSA)
Process for application Cost for PITS (from € 250,- up to > €
100.000, - for same RS-type!)
![Page 14: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
All Parties
Whe have done a lot of work, but
There is still a lot to do!
For EVERYBODY!!
![Page 15: 17 November 2010 1 INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082917/551525ef55034673228b52c8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
All Parties
Questions?
When done: thank you for your attention!