133 xe, 133 xe m and 133 i decay evaluations ciemat m. galan

34
133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Upload: damon-dawson

Post on 17-Jan-2016

252 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe, 133Xem and 133I decay evaluations

CIEMATM. GALAN

Page 2: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

SUMMARY

Evaluation procedure

DECAY SCHEME AND APPLICATIONS

HALF-LIFE MEASUREMENTS

RELATIVE GAMMA-RAY PROBABILITIES

NORMALIZATION AND ABSOLUTE GAMMA-RAY PROBABILITIES

GAMMA TRANSITIONS AND MULTIPOLARITIES

BETA TRANSITION PROBABILITIES

ATOMIC DATA

SECONDARY EMISSIONS (X-RAY AND AUGER ELECTRON PROBABILITIES)

Page 3: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

SHORT A=133 CHAIN EVALUATED

133I

133Xe

133Cs

133Xem

I.T.

Page 4: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Applications

133Xe is used in medical studies for: Diagnostic evaluation in pulmonary

function. Imaging the lung. Assessment of cerebral blood flow. Fetal risk diagnoses.

133I, 133Xem and 133Xe are fission products. Xenon isotopes are of particular interest in reactor operation.

Page 5: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe decay scheme

Ensdat file

Page 6: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Half-life measurements

Reference Value (d) Comments

2002UN02, 1992UN011975HO181975WO101974CA271974FOZY1972EM011968AL161950MA15

5,2475 (5)5,25 (2)

5,250 (13)5,245 (6)5,240 (6)5,29 (1)

5,312 (25)5,270 (2)

Rejected by Chauvenet’s criterionRejected by Chauvenet’s criterionRejected by Chauvenet’s criterion

Mean 2/N-1 (critical)

LWM 5,2474 (5) 3,32

NRM 5,2474 (5) 2,37 (95%)

RT 5,2474 (5)

Recommended 5,2474 (5) Includes the most precise value

T1/2 (mean) = 5,243 (1) d (1995RA12, from 1975MEZK)

= 0,08%

= 0,07%T1/2 (mean) = 5,244 (7) d (Lagoutine et al., 1982)

Page 7: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Relative gamma emission probabilities

6 -rays emitted in the decay of 133Xe

EnergykeV

2,1(Cs) 79,6142 (12)

1,0(Cs) 80,9979 (11)

2,0(Cs) 160,6120 (16)

3,2(Cs) 223,2368 (18)

3,1(Cs) 302,8508 (5)

3,0(Cs) 383,8485 (12)

Page 8: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Relative gamma emission probabilities

Evaluation:

• The group I79,6+I81 was considered as the reference line.

• I79,6 was deduced using the ratio I79,6/I160,6 from 133Ba decay evaluation

(Chechev and Kuzmenko, 2004):

)%9(76,0)8(028,1

)8(27,4)22(182,0

6,160

6,796,1606,79

BaXe I

III

)%9(24,99)9(76,010081 I

• I160,6 and I223 averaged from 1968AL16 and 1995MA05.

• I303 averaged from 1969ER04, 1968AL16 and 1995MA05.

Page 9: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

• Experimental values for the ratio I384/I303:

Reference I384/I303

1958PL55 0,50 (11)

1959JH17 0,512 (13)

1961ER041 0,504 (88)

1968AL16 0,458 (20)

1992MA05 0,467 (27)

LWM 0,492

2 /N-1 (crit.) 2,37

Internal uncertainty 0,010

External uncertainty 0,012

Recommended 0,492 (12)

)14(0081,0)12(492,0)29(0164,0303

384303384

LWMI

III

133Xe Relative gamma emission probabilities

• I384 deduced from the 303 keV -ray emission probability and the averaged I384/I303 ratio :

Page 10: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Relative gamma emission probabilities

Reference 79,6 81 161 223 303 384

1958PL55 - - - - 0,010 0,005

1959JH17 - 100 1,4 - 0,084 0,043

1961ER04 0,8 (1) 100 0,109 (10) 0,0004 (+4-3) 0,0123 (12) 0,0062 (9)

1968AL16 1001,6 (7) 98,2 (59)

0,174 (9) 0,000647 (613) 0,0135 (4) 0,00618 (19)

1992MA05 100 0,242 (25) 0,00044 (18) 0,0193 (7) 0,000901 (41)

Weighted average

0,182 0,00046 0,0164

2/N-1 (crit.) 6,55 6,6 6,4

Internal uncertainty

0,008 0,00017 0,0005

External uncertainty

0,022 0,00006 0,0029

Recommended 0,76 (9) 99,24 (9) 0,182 (22) 0,00046 (17) 0,0164 (29) 0,0081 (14)

Page 11: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Normalization

• Normalization factor was deduced from the decay scheme considering no direct feeding to the g.s.

• ICCs from BrIcc computer code (2002BA85). Associated uncertainties are

1,4%.

)3(373,0)3(0202,01)14(0081,0)5(294,01)22(182,0)24(698,11)9(24,99

100

N

• Checked with GABS: NR = 0,373 (4)

Page 12: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Absolute gamma emission probabilities

EnergykeV

Photons per 100 disintegrations

2,1(Cs) 79,6142 (12) 0,28 (3)

1,0(Cs) 80,9979 (11) 37,0 (3)

2,0(Cs) 160,6120 (16) 0,068 (8)

3,2(Cs) 223,2368 (18) 0,00017 (6)

3,1(Cs) 302,8508 (5) 0,0061 (11)

3,0(Cs) 383,8485 (12) 0,0030(5)

• E and uncertainties from 2000HE14.

• Absolute -ray probabilities uncertainties calculated from 1986BR21.

Page 13: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Gamma transitions and multipolarites

• Gamma-ray transition probabilities deduced from %I and the adopted ICC.

• Multipolarities: evaluated by 1977KR13 from experimental angular correlation

data.

80 from 1995RA12 from (exp), penetration parameter (M1)= 4(4).

-ray energy Multipolarity

79,6142 (12) 0,124 (15) M1+1,54%E2

80,9979 (11) -0,151 (2) M1+2,28%E2

160,6120 (16) +0,96 (5) M1+92,2%E2

223,2368 (18) -0,114 (14) M1+1,3%E2

302,8508 (5) +0,022 (20) M1+0,05%E2

383,8485 (12) E2

Page 14: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Beta transitions

• energies deduced from the Q value and the level energies in 133Cs, the later

deduce from -ray energies (2000HE14). The adopted level energies values

were checked with GTOL computer code.

• All -transition are allowed. Log ft values were obtained with LOGFT code.

• %-probabilities were deduced from -ray transition intensity balance at each

level. Associated uncertainties were obtained using reference 1988BR07.

Energy keV

Probability × 100

Nature lg ft

-0,3 43,6 (24) 0,0097 (12) Allowed 6,82

-0,2 266,8 (24) 0,87 (8) Allowed 7,31

-0,1 346,4 (24) 99,12 (8) Allowed 5,62

Page 15: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xe Atomic data and secondary emissions

• Atomic data from 1996SC06.

• X-ray and Auger electron emission probabilities from EMISSION

code. Results were checked with RADLST code. Differences < 1%.

Average energy (keV)

Type Intensity (%)

Emission Radlst

4,29 XL 5,79 (11) 5,83 (18)

30,625 XK2 13,54 (24) 13,6 (5)

30,973 XK1 25,0 (5) 25,0 (9)

35,00 XK 9,09 (16) 9,1 (3)

3,55 Auger-L 49,9 (3) 49,9 (15)

25,50 Auger-K 5,64 (24) 5,63 (19)

Page 16: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Comparison with previous evaluations

Lagoutine et al. (1982) 1995Ra12 This evaluation

Half-life 1974CA27, 1975HO18, 1975WO10

1975MEZK

1950MA15, 1968AL16, 1974FOZY, 1974CA27, 1975WO10, 1975HO18,

2002UN02

E1968AL16, 1981HE15, Imbert et

al., LMRI 1981-88133Ba e.c. decay 2000HE14

I1961ER04, 1974CA27 (no uncert.), 1977SC31(133Ba), Imbert et al., LMRI 1981-88

1983LOZV (Priv. Comm.)1958PL55, 1959JH17, 1961ER04, 1968AL16,

1992MA05

E 1961ER04Q value and level energy

(GTOL)

Q 1993AU05 1993AU05 2003AU03

Page 17: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xem decay scheme

Page 18: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xem Half-life measurements

Reference Value (days) Comments

1975HO181974FOZY1968AL161961ER041951BE11

2,19 (5)2,188 (8)2,191 (29)2,26 (2)2,30 (8)

Mean 2/N-1 (critical)

LWM 2,198 (13) 3,32

NRM 2,200 (11) 2,37 (95%)

RT 2,191 (8)

Adopted value 2,198 (13)

T1/2 (mean) = 2,188 (22) (Lagoutine et al., 1982)

= 0,4%

= 0,5%

T1/2 (mean) = 2,19 (1) (1995RA12)

Page 19: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xem isomeric transition (1)

• Different experimental values for the -ray transition energy:

Reference Value (keV)

1976ME16 233,221 (15)

1972AC02 233,2 (4)

1952BE55 232,8 (3)

1951BE11 232,8 (4)

2/N-1 (crit.) 2,60

LWM 233,219 (15)

NRM 233,219 (15)

RT 233,11 (12)

Adopted value 233,219 (15)

Page 20: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133Xem isomeric transition (2)

• ICCs from BrIcc computer code (2002BA85).

• %I = 100 / (1 + T) = 100 / [1 + 8,84 (13)] = 10,16 (13) %.

• P+ce = 100 % and %Pce = 89,84 (13) %

• The k and L+M+… experimental values together with the theoretical ones are shown in the

table:

Reference K L+M+..

1954BE55 4,4 (14) 1,9 (6

1968AL16 7,68 (25) 3,8 (3)

1968HA52 6,37 (9) 2,51 (5)

1972AC02 7,4 (14) 2,9 (6)

1978RO22 6,32 (9) 2,69 (4)

2002BA85 6,24 (9) 2,59 (3)

2008PE04 6,5 (9) 2,9 (4)

Page 21: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

• Atomic data from 1996SC06.

• X-ray and Auger electron emission probabilities from EMISSION code.

Results were checked with RADLST code. Differences < 0,6%.

133Xem Atomic data

Average energy (keV)

Type Intensity (%)

Emission Radlst

4,110 XL 7,6 (4) 7,60 (22)

29,458 (10) XK2 16,0 (4) 16,0 (6)

29,779 (10) XK1 29,7 (6) 29,7 (11)

33,60 XK 10,64 (24)

10,6 (4)

3,43 Auger-L 70,4 (10) 70,3 (20)

24,60 Auger-K 7,1 (4) 7,1 (3)

Page 22: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Comparison with previous evaluations

Lagoutine et al. (1982)

1995Ra12 This evaluation

Half-life 1974FOZY, 1974CA27, 1975HO18

1961ER04, 1968AL16, 1974FOZY, 1975HO18

1951BE11, 1961ER04, 1968AL16, 1974FOZY,

1975HO18

E 1976ME16 1976ME161951BE51, 1952BE55, 1972AC02,1976ME16

ICC 1968HA52 1978RO22 2002BA85

Q 1993AU05 1993AU05 2003AU03

Page 23: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I decay scheme

Ensdat file

11 ’s

47 ’s

Page 24: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Half-life measurements

Reference Value (h) Comments

1968RE041966EI011965AN051955WA351953KA28

20,9 (1)20,8 (2)20,3 (3)20,9 (3)20,8 (2)

Rejected by Chauvenet’s criterion

Mean 2/N-1 (crit.)

LWM 20,87 (8) 3,78

NRM 20,87 (8) 2,60 (95%)

RT 20,87 (8)

Recommended 20,87 (8)

= 0,3%T1/2 (mean) = 20,8 (1) h

(1995RA12)

Page 25: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Relative gamma emission probabilities

• Values are from 1976ME16. A 2% was increased in the uncertainty to account for uncertainty calibration as cited in this reference.

• Other experimental values: 1974KO26, but not used because detailed

information about detector calibration, experimental conditions, sample

preparation, calculation and uncertainties estimations is absent.

Page 26: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Normalization

• Normalization factor was deduced from the decay scheme considering no direct feeding to the g.s.

• ICCs from BrIcc computer code (2002BA85). P+ce(233keV) from 1976ME16.

• Checked with GABS: NR = 0,0863 (16)

)16(0863,01

)233(100

iiT

ce

iI

keVPN

Page 27: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Gamma transitions and multipolarites

• Gamma-ray transition probabilities deduced from %I and the adopted ICC.

• No experimental measurements of conversion coefficients (except for the

233-keV line) have been found in the bibliography.

• Multipolarities: from 1977KR13 or from 1974KO26.

Page 28: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Beta transitions

• energies deduced from the Q value and the level energies in 133Xe. Checked with GTOL. • %-probabilities from -ray transition intensity balance at each level. Associated uncertainties were obtained using 1988BR07. Log ft from LOGFT code.

Beta Transition Adopted (%) 1966EI01 (%) 1971SA09 (%) 1976ME16 (%)

0,13 0,414 (15) 0,5 0,5 0,42

0,12 1,25 (4) 3,5 1,1 1,26

0,11 0,397 (12) 0,4 0,3 0,4

0,10 3,75 (7) 3,7 2,9 3,68

0,9 3,12 (6) 3,3 3,2 3,16

0,8 0,58 (5) 0,5 0,5 0,62

0,7 0,026 (18) - - -

0,6 4,16 (13) 2,3 3,5 4,1

0,5 1,81 (6) - 2,3 1,81

0,3 83,44 (21) 85,4 83,2 83,5

0,1 1,07 (6) 1,4 1,4 1,07

Page 29: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

133I Atomic data and secondary emissions

• Atomic data from 1996SC06.

• X-ray and Auger electron emission probabilities from EMISSION code.

Results were checked with RADLST. Differences < 0,6%.

Average energy (keV)

Type Intensity (%)

Emission Radlst

4,11 XL 0,0653 (13) 0,0656 (18)

29,458 (10) XK2 0,163 (4) 0,163 (7)

29,779 (10) XK1 0,303 (6) 0,303 (13)

33,6 XK 0,1084 (23) 0,109 (5)

3,430 Auger-L 0,607 (4) 0,607 (22)

24,60 Auger-K 0,072 (4) 0,072 (3)

Page 30: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Comparison with previous evaluations

1995Ra12 This evaluation

Half-life1953KA28, 1955WA35, 1965ANo5, 1966EI01,

1968RE04

Same references but 20,87(8) h instead of

20,8 (1)h

E 1976ME16 1976ME16, 2000HE14

I 1976ME16 1976ME16

E 1966EI01Q value and level energy

(GTOL)

Q 1993AU05 2003AU03

Page 31: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

CONCLUSIONS

• New precise values for 133Xe, 133Xem and 133I half-lives.

• 133Xe: I from 1992MA05 values not were considered in previous evaluations.

• Recalculated %I using interpolated ICC from 2002BA85.

• Recent E from 2000HE14.

• Recalculated E and %

• New measurements of the half-lives and Iare highly recommended.

Page 32: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Next evaluations

• 135mXe, already finished (submitted for revision)

• 22Na

• 59Ni

• 94Nb

Thanks for your attention!

Page 33: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

Bibliography I

1950MA01 Macnamara, J.; Collins, C.B.; Thode, H.G. Phys. Rev. 78 (1950) 1291951BE11 Bergström, I. Phys. Rev. 81 (1951) 6381952BE55 Bergström, I. Ark. Fysik 5 (1952) 1911953GR07 Graham, R.L.; Bell, R.E. Canadian J. Phys. 31 (1953) 3771953KA28 Katcoff, S.; Rubinson, W. Phys. Rev 91(1953) 14581954BE36 Bergström, I.; Thulin, S.; Wapstra, A.H.; Aström, B. Ark. Fysik 7 (1954) 2551955WA35 Wahl, A. Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) 7301959HO97 Holm, G. Ryde, H. Ark. Fysik 15 (1959) 3871960EI01 Eichler, E. ; Chase, J.W.; Johnson, N.R.; O’Kelley, G.D. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 5 (1960) 4481961ER04 Erman, P.; Sujkowsky, Z. Ark. Fysik, 20 (1961) 2091965AN05 Anderson, G.; Rudstam, G.; Sörensen, G. Ark. Fysik. 28 (1965) 371966EI01 Eichler, E. ; Chase, J.W.; Johnson, N.R.; O’Kelley, G.D. Phys. Rev. 146 (1966) 8991966TH09 Thun, J.E.; Töknkvist, S.; Nielsen, K.B.; Snellman, H.; Falk, F.; Mocoroa, A. Nucl. Phys. 88 (1966) 2891968AL16 Alexander, P.; Lau, J.P. Nucl. Phys. A121 (1968) 6121968HA52 Hager, R.S., Seltzer, E.C. Nucl. Data A4 (1968) 11968RE04 Reynolds, S.A.; Emery, J.F.; Wyatt, E.I. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 32 (1968) 461971SA09 Saxena, R.N.; Sharma, H.D. Nucl. Phys. A171 (1971) 5931972AC02 Achterberg, E.; Iglesias, F.C.; Jech, A.E. Moragues, J.A.; Otero, D.; Pérez, M.L.; Proto, A.N.; Rossi,

J.J.; Scheuer, W.; Suárez, J.F. Phys. Rev. C5 (1972) 17591972EM01 Emery, J.F.; Reynolds, S.A.; Wyatt, E.I. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 48 (1972) 3191972KR07 Krane, K.S.; Olsen, C.E.; Steyert, W.A. Phys. Rev. C5 (1972) 16711974CA27 Cavallo, L.M.; Schima, F.J.; Unterweger, M.P. Phys. Rev. C10 (1974) 2631

1974FOZY Fontanilla, J.; Prindle, A.L.; Landrum, J.H.; Meyer, R.A. Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 19 (1974) 501

Page 34: 133 Xe, 133 Xe m and 133 I decay evaluations CIEMAT M. GALAN

1975HO18 Hoffman, D.C.; Barnes, J.W.; Dropesky, B.J.; Lawrence, F.O.; Kelly, G.M.; Ott, M.A. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 37 (1975) 2336

1975MEZK Merrit, J.S.; Gibson, F.M. AECL-5032 (1975), p. 34.1975WO10 Woods, M.J.; Goodier, I.W.; Lucas, Sylvia E.M. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 26 (1975) 4851976ME16 Meyer, R.A.; Momyer, F.F.; Henry, E.A.; Yaffe, R.P.; Walters, W.B. Phys. Rev. C14 (1976) 11521977KR13 Krane, K.S. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 19 (1977) 3631977SC31 Schötzig, U.; Debertin, K.; Walz, K.F. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 28 (1977) 503.1978RO22 Rosel, F., Fries, H.M., Alder, K. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 21 (1978) 91

Imbert, L. Kadchi, A., Morel, J., N.T. LMRI 1981-19881981HE15 Helmer, R.G.; Caffrey, A.J.; Fehrke, R.C.; Greenwood, R.C. Nucl. Inst. Meth. 188 (1981) 671.

Lagoutine, F. Coursol, N.; Legrand, J. Table de Radionucléides, CEA, ISBN: 2-7272-004-8 (1982).1983LOZV Lorentz, A., INDC (NDS)-145/GEI, 1983.1983LO08 Lönnroth, T.; Kumpulainen, J.; Tuokko, C. Physica Scripta 27 (1983) 2281986SC34 Schötzig, U. and Weiss, H.M. Instrum. Meth. A 252 (1986) 801989RA17 Raghavan, P. At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 42 (1989) 1891992MA05 Martin, R.H.; Keller, N.A. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 43 (1992) 4631992UN01 Unterweger, M.P.; Hoppes, D.D.; Schima, F.J. Nucl. Inst. Meth. A312 (1992) 3491994HEZZ Helmer, R.G.; Van der Leun, C.; Van Assche P.H.M. Priv. Comm.1995RA12 Rab, S. Nucl. Data Sheets 75 (1995) 4911996SC06 Scönfeld, E.; Janssen, H.. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 369 (1996) 5272000HE14 Helmer, R.G.; van der Leun, C. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 52 (2000) 6012002BA85 Band, I.M.; Trzhaskovskaya, M.B. Nestor, C.W. Jr. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 81 (2002) 12002UN02 Unterweger, M.P. Nucl. Inst. Meth.A56 (2002) 1252003AU03 Audi, G.; Wapstra, A.H.; Thibault, C. Nucl. Phys. A 729 (2003) 337

Bibliography II