1302 nucor plung
TRANSCRIPT
Plung…(Nucor Case 2009)
Dandalina – ErlisNia – Satrio
MBA Shariah 2, SBM ITB
Steel is a cornerstone and
key driver for the world’s
economy
The Use of Steel
Nucor: A Successful Steel
Company
Financial Strength
Low & Highly Variable Cost Structure Highly Flexible Production Capabilities
Product Diversification & Market Leadership
Nucor’s People = THE RIGHT PEOPLE for our culture!!!
Nucor Strength:
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
LONG-TERM PROFITABLE GROWTH Net Income 2000-2008 (millions of dollars)
25% CAGR
8
Nucor’s Industry Leading Profitability2004-2008 Return On Equity (average annual ROE %)
21.1%
26.8%
32.2% 32.5%33.6%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
GerdauAmeristeel
CommercialMetals
U.S. Steel Steel Dynamics NUCOR
9
Nucor’s Industry Leading Profitability – With Industry Lowest Leverage2008 Yearend Debt-To-Capital Ratios
61.9%
51.1%
44.7%
39.0%
28.3%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Steel Dynamics GerdauAmeristeel
CommercialMetals
U.S. Steel NUCOR
10
Sheet - 30%
Bars - 21%
Structural - 11%
Plate - 10%
Downstream Products - 14%
Raw M aterials - 14%
Diversified Product Mix2008 Sales Tons
PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATION REDUCES EARNINGS VOLATILITY!!!
Nucor is North America’s Most Diversified Steel Producer
11
Nucor’s Highly Flexible Production
Highly flexible production process utilizing electric arc furnaces and highly productive labor allow Nucor to almost instantaneously adjust output to match market demand
Nucor is company that value its peoples
13
The Business Week 50: The Best Performers
April 6, 2009
Top Stories
The BusinessWeek 50: The Best Performers
From 3D software designer Autodesk to
steelmaker Nucor, our annual list of top performers shows innovation remains the engine of success
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
LONG-TERM PROFITABLE GROWTH Net Income 2000-2008 (millions of dollars)
25% CAGR
Plunge…Krisis Ekonomi 2008 telah membuat demand
untuk baja berkurang sangat signifikan, demikian juga laba bersih perseroan
Slowdown was occurring already before the financial shock
The financial shock reduced capital availability
Causing a contraction in fixed asset investment
(OECD)
Steel-using sector plunge
The challenges :1. To asses the threats & opportunities2. To select the best strategies & structure
Key succes factor : established organization design, management philosophy, incentive system.
Nucor’s Formula For Success
3 Divisions : joist plants, steel mills, & miscellaneous plants.
Decentralized operation with own manufacturing, selling, accounting, engineering, & personnel management. 4 levels from top to bottom
expect to earn 25% of ROA Efficiencies : scrap steel from independent broker,
actual shipping cost, no volume discount, just in time.
Organizational style : not constrained, “Stripped down” & “No nonsense”. Informal, trusting, not bureaucratic.
Division Managers Informal, trusting, not bereaucratic. Each month :
financial consolidation, sharing information, corporate mgt examination
High Competition for many small customer : Cost Leadership.
1. Vulcraft The Joist Divisions : steel joist & joist girders, high competion, the largest supplier in 1975, price & delivery performance
2. Steel Divisions : Provide raw material for the vulcraft plants 75%, other customer 25%, the first that build a mini mill to manufacture steel
3. The Steelmaking Processing
SBU Form of the Multidivisional Structure for Implementing a Related Linked Strategy
Porter 5 Forces
Porter 5 Forces of Nucor Strategy The first is industry competitors, which is the intensity of
rivalry among firms in the industry. There are two basic types of competition; price and quality. Nucor focused on the manufacturing segment know as minimills and thus saved on costly labor, raw materials, and the capital-intensive machinery necessary to produce steel from iron ore. “Nucor was able to expand sales from the minimills by keeping costs below its competitors.” Also, another means of maintaining quality control and costs was a “highly decentralized organizational structure.” Corporate staff was kept to a minimum and individual plant-level mangers were given authority on decisions. By using the minimills and keeping the corporate staff to a minimum, costs would be kept at a minimum and quality would still be maintained; thus keeping the industry competitors in a need to keep up.
The second is new entrants which were threats of new competitors entering the market. As was said before; the minimills and minimum corporate staff helped keep prices below competitors. In addition, the risk of adapting an untested German process for manufacturing flat steel also paid off and helped get the company ahead of the competitors. This process was quite a risk for the Nucor Company but Ken Iverson, CEO, made the decision and luckily it paid off. Again by keeping price down and quality up, new entrants were kept from coming in and if they did decide to enter it would take them a lot to get up to Nucor’s level.
Porter 5 Forces of Nucor Strategy
The third and fourth are the bargaining power of consumer and buyers and these two are controlled by also keeping the costs down and the quality up. As long as Nucor carefully monitored costs and paid attention to the needs of its markets, then it had the upper hand in the decisions of the company because as long as they keep the top standing as cheapest and best quality production, then the consumer and buyers have no where else to go and thus can only follow what Nucor decides and therefore gives it the upper-hand.
Porter 5 Forces of Nucor Strategy
The fifth force is substitutes which is the threats of substitute products or services. This also is answered with; as long as prices are kept at a low and quality kept at a high then Nucor has the upper hand and people would have no need to go and find other substitutes elsewhere.
Porter 5 Forces of Nucor Strategy
Strategy vs. Structure: Evolutionary PatternsSeveral structure forms are used to implement strategies, including: 1. Simple 2. Functional 3. Multidivisional
Strategy and Structure Growth Pattern
Functional Structure
FK IversonChairman
President/CEO
HD AycockPresident/COO
Samuel SeigelVP Finance
Personnel
VP & GM Nucor Steel 4 steel mills
VP & GM Vulcraft6 jist plants
Planning
Research Chemicals
Machined Products
Fastener
Grinding Balls
Cold FinishVP & GM
Related Linked Strategy
Terry LisenbyEVP CEO, Treasurer
Eliz BowersGM Taxes
James FriesGM Controller
Jim CoblinVP Human Resources
Ham LottEVP
6 joist plants3 cold finish
1 grinding ball
Mike ParrishEVP
9 bar mills1 fastener mill
GM Construction
Dan DiMiccoVice Chairman President/CEO
Rae EagleGM Secretary
Jeff KempGM Strategic
Planning
GM Environment
John FerriolaEVP
3 sheet milsNucor/Yamato
Joseph Rutkowski EVP International
Div.
Robert JohnsDirector Marketing
Sheet mils
Terima Kasih