10 reasons why moon landing could be a hoax

login

Register

Search

Listverse Ultimate Top 10 Lists

Home

Categories

Archives

Submit a List

Podcast

Store

about

forumssubscribe

10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax

by Josh Fox, December 28, 2012

The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to assert their victory in the space race

over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.

Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon.

After the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the term of

Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky

Dick to fake them to put America in good standing in the Cold War.

In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried

to include NASA’s explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.10

The Waving Flag

of 1310 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax - Listverse

3/9/2013http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/?utm_medi...

Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon landing was shown on live television, viewers

could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos

of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the

flag. The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the

flag to blow.Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed

that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted.

Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole,

which is shown to shake in the video footage.

9

Lack of Impact Crater



The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon, there would be a blast crater underneath the

lunar module to mark its landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost

as though the module was simply placed there. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.

Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations.

NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than it would

have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible

anyway – in the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip.

8

Multiple Light Sources

On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s fair to suggest that all shadows should run

parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly show

that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy theorists suggest that this must mean multiple light sources

are present -suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set.NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the strange shadows, with subtle bumps and hills on the

moon’s surface causing the discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some theorists;

how could hills cause such large angular differences? In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly

contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.7

The Van Allen Radiation Belt



In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The Apollo missions to the

moon marked the first ever attempts to transport living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend

that the sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of

aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.

NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of time it took the astronauts to traverse

the belt – meaning they received only very small doses of radiation.

6

The Unexplained Object



After photographs of the moon landings were released, theorists were quick to notice a mysterious object (shown

above) in the reflection of an astronaut’s helmet from the Apollo 12 mission. The object appears to be hanging

from a rope or wire and has no reason to be there at all, leading some to suggest it is an overhead spotlight typically found in film studios.

The resemblance is questionable, given the poor quality of the photograph, but the mystery remains as to why

something is being suspended in mid-air (or rather lack of air) on the moon. The lunar module in other photos

appears to have no extension from it that matches the photo, so the object still remains totally unexplained.

5

Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables

In order to support claims that the moon landings were shot in a studio, conspiracy theorists had to account for

the apparent low-gravity conditions, which must have been mimicked by NASA. It has been suggested that if you

take the moon landing footage and increase the speed of the film x2.5, the astronauts appear to be moving in

Earth’s gravity. As for the astronaut’s impressive jump height, which would be impossible to perform in Earth’s

gravity, hidden cables and wires have been suggested as giving the astronauts some extra height. In some

screenshots outlines of alleged hidden cables can be seen (the photograph above supposedly shows a wire, though

it is extremely vague).

Your Zodiac Horoscope

AboutAstro.com/horoscope

Insert Your Birthdate & Get Answers about

Past-Present and Future. Free



4

Lack of Stars

One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video

evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what

we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the

hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality

of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you

can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.3

The “C” Rock



One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be

the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be

a natural occurrence. It has been suggested that the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by an

alleged film crew. A set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to

the camera.

NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter, on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding

the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got

tangled up somewhere in the developing process.

2

The Layered Cross-hairs

The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and

direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the

cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs may have been edited or doctored after being

taken. The photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the

cross-hairs, including the American flag in one picture and the lunar rover in another.

Conspiracy theorists have suggested NASA printed the man-made objects over a legitimate photograph of the

moon to hoax the landings – although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used cross-hairs in the

first place is a mystery.

1

The Duplicate Backdrop



The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have identical backdrops, despite being

officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all

photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and

disappear in another? Well, if you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their moon landing videos.

NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to

the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly

false.

Bonus

The Stanley Kubrick Theory



Share this:

This loose extension of the popular conspiracy theory states that acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick was

approached by the US government to hoax the first three moon landings. There are two main branches of this

somewhat implausible theory: one group of believers maintain that Kubrick was approached after he released

2001: A Space Odyssey (released in 1968, one year before the first moon landing), after NASA came to

appreciate the stunning realism of the film’s outer-space scenes at that time; another group contends that Kubrick

was groomed by the government to film the moon landing long before this, and that 2001: A Space Odyssey was

a staged practice run for him.So what evidence might support such claims? Well: apparently, if you watch The Shining (another Kubrick

picture), you can pick up on some alleged messages hidden by Kubrick to subtly inform the world of his part in

the conspiracy. The most obvious is the child’s Apollo 11 shirt worn in only one scene. Another supposed gem is

the line written on Jack Nicholson’s character’s typewriter: “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”, in

which the word “all” can be interpreted as A11, or Apollo 11.

If you aren’t convinced yet, Kubrick made the mysterious hotel room in the film number 237. Guess how many

miles it is from here to the moon: 238,000. So divide that by a thousand and minus one, and you’ve got one

airtight theory right there.

Other Great Lists on Listverse



Top 10 Fascinating

Facts About Sex

10 Bizarre Human

Mysteries

10 Unsolved

Mysteries of

Science

10 Science Fiction

Projects That Are

Becoming Reality

It's A Horrible Mistake!

Avengers Is Nothing In Comparison With This Superhero!

The REAL Reason Why The Pope Resigned!

Why Didn't You Spot It When You Were A Kid?

From Our Partners

248 comments

Leave a message...

Discussion Community #Share

• Reply •

zi artitect • 2 months ago

-10: The flag was fastened to a Г-shaped rod so that it did not hang down. The flag only seemed to flutter

when the astronauts were moving it into position. Without air drag, these movements caused the free corner

of the flag to swing like a pendulum for some time. The flag was rippled because it had been folded during

storage—the ripples could be mistaken for movement in a still photo. Videos show that when the astronauts

let go of the flagpole it vibrates briefly but then remains still

-9: No crater should be expected. The Descent Propulsion System was throttled very far down during the final

landing. The Moon lander was no longer quickly decelerating, so the descent engine only had to support the

lander's own weight, which was lessened by the Moon's gravity and by the near exhaustion of the descent

propellants

-8: Shadows on the Moon are complicated by reflected light, uneven ground, wide-angle lens distortion, and

lunar dust. There are several light sources: the Sun, sunlight reflected from the Earth, sunlight reflected from

the Moon's surface, and sunlight reflected from the astronauts and the Lunar Module. Light from these

sources is scattered by lunar dust in many directions, including into shadows. Shadows falling into craters and

hills may appear longer, shorter and distorted. Furthermore, shadows display the properties of vanishing point

perspective, leading them to converge to a point on the horizon.

-7: The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that 33 of

6★

see moreShare ›



Recent Lists

Popular Lists

Horrific Tales of Historic Cannibalism

By: Karl SmallwoodMarch 9th, 2013

Mythological Beliefs with Surprisingly Logical Explanations

By: Gregory Myers

March 9th, 2013

Bizarre Little-Known Mysteries of the Unexplained

By: Mike Williams

March 9th, 2013

Alternatives to Evolution

By: Morris M.

March 8th, 2013

Insane Cases of Genetic Engineering

By: Andrew Handley

March 8th, 2013



Common Misconceptions About the Ancient Greeks

By: Gregory Myers

March 8th, 2013

» Random list

Categories

Art & Literature (139)

Bizarre (196)

Crime & Mystery (124)

Entertainment (209)

Fact & Fiction (121)

Food & Health (89)

History (205)Miscellaneous (311)

Movies (251)

Music (150)

People & Politics (193)

Religion (79)

Science & Nature (306)

Site News (75)

Sport & Travel (122)



DiscussionsPeople

Recent

Popular

Most Discussed

10 Alternatives to Evolution

274 comments · 1 hour ago

10 Mythological Beliefs with Surprisingly Logical Explanations

12 comments · 1 hour ago

10 Bizarre Little-Known Mysteries of the Unexplained

10 comments · 6 minutes ago

10 Horrific Tales of Historic Cannibalism

9 comments · 13 minutes ago

10 Insane Cases of Genetic Engineering

47 comments · 4 hours ago

Listverse

Home / All Lists / Submissions / Privacy / About

Listverse is a Trademark of Listverse Ltd

Copyright © 2007-2013 Listverse Ltd

All Rights Reserved

Find us on Google+



10 reasons why moon landing could be a hoax

Documents

moon landings

moonlan claim

moonlan theorists

blast crater

waving flag theory

american flag waving

lunar module

nasas explanations