1 preservation parcels investigation report to the board of county commissioners september 19, 2006...

19
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

Upload: laureen-floyd

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

1

Preservation Parcels Investigation

Report to the

Board of County Commissioners

September 19, 2006

1:30 PM

Page 2: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

2

Preservation Parcels Investigationper County Commission Direction

The Board of County Commissioners in early Feb 2005 directed staff to bring back a proposal to comprehensively address all privately owned land designated as Preservation on the Future Land Use Map.

Follow-up discussion included investigating creation of new land use category that might apply to some of the private parcels incorrectly mapped as Preservation, but may warrant a higher level of Future Land Use protection than other land use designations provide.

Page 3: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

3

Recommendations

Parcels not under public or non-profit ownership should be corrected to Rural/Agriculture on FLU Map; new land use category not required.

Parcels zoned Conservation (C-1) should continue to be zoned “C-1”.

With the exception of one area in Chacala Pond Strategic Ecosystem, all parcels zoned Agriculture (A) should continue to be zoned “A”; work with Chacala Pond owners on appropriate zoning and/or other protection strategies.

Page 4: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

4

Comprehensive Plan Framework for Natural Resource Protection

Preservation Areas Land Use Category Publicly owned* lands intended for use as natural

reserves or managed conservation lands Management plan for preservation area by

responsible public/non-profit agency Subject to applicable Conservation Policies

* or non-profit

Page 5: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

5

Conservation Areas/Designations

Apply regardless of Land Use Category Specific resources are protected through

standards and processes based on site specific evaluation

Protected conservation areas include: wetlands,

surface waters,

100-yr floodplain,

strategic ecosystems,

listed species habitat, and

significant geological features

Page 6: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

6

Conservation (C-1) Zoning District

Used for properties which have natural limitations to development because of their sensitive environmental character.

Development permitted consistent with the land use designation and in accordance with natural and historic resources protectionsin Chapter 406, Land Development Code

Allows Single family residence with minimum lot area 10 acres, subject to specified performance standards and development plan approval by Development Review Committee.

Building impact area including footprint of house and other impervious areas not to exceed one acre; sited for least adverse impact to natural systems.

Page 7: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

7

Summary of Investigation

Staff investigated over 450 parcels having either public ownership or a “Preservation” land use.

Most found to be publicly owned or have an easement for conservation purpose, and confirmed as Preservation.

Some conflicting or unclear ownership found for 15 parcels.

48 privately owned parcels incorrectly mapped as Preservation.

Page 8: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

8

Summary of Investigation48 Parcels Incorrectly Mapped

Existing Land Use

Zoning

Natural Resources

Page 9: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

9

Preservation

Investigation

Locations

Page 10: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

10

Lochloosa Wildlife

Conservation Area – Area 1

Conservation LandsZoningWetlands & FloodplainWetlands & Floodplain

Recommendation:

Correct Preservation to Rural/Agriculture on FLU Map.

Maintain “A” Zoning.

Page 11: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

11

48 Parcels Not Publicly Owned: Characteristics

42 parcels in subdivided areas – 22 are developed e.g. residences, 1 cemetery, 2 misc.– 20 vacant

6 parcels outside subdivided areas– 5 vacant, 1 misc.

Page 12: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

12

44 Parcels Less than 20 acres- Uses

27 parcels less than 5 acres,– 12 residences, 13 vacant, 1 cemetery,

1 misc. 11 parcels > 5 acres, less than 10,

– 5 residences, 5 vacant, I misc. 6 parcels > 10 ac, less than 20,

– 2 residences, 4 vacant

Page 13: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

13

– 2 zoned Agriculture 28 ac w/significant wetlands and floodplain 103 ac some wetlands and floodplain, preservation

buffer overlay

– 2 zoned C-1 27 ac w/significant wetlands and floodplain 230 ac w/significant wetlands and floodplain

Four Parcels 20 acres or More -Zoning, Acreage and Resources

Page 14: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

14

Lochloosa Wildlife

Conservation Area – Area 1

Cluster 2

Future Land UseConservation LandsZoningWetlandsFloodplainWetlands & Floodplain

Recommendation:

Correct Preservation to Rural/Agriculture on FLU Map.

Maintain “A” Zoning.

Page 15: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

15

Newnans Lake

Parcel 1

Strategic EcosystemsFuture Land UseConservation LandsZoningWetlandsFloodplainWetlands & Floodplain

Recommendation:

Correct Preservation to Rural/Agriculture on FLU Map.

Maintain “A” Zoning.

Page 16: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

16

Paynes Prairie Area 1

Cluster 2

Future Land UseZoningWetlandsFloodplainWetlands & Floodplain

Recommendation:

Correct Preservation to Rural/Agriculture on FLU Map.

Work with Chacala Pond owner on appropriate strategy for resource protection, such as C-1 zoning or other tools.

Page 17: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

17

Results of Evaluation

Incorrect Preservation designation on FLU Map should be corrected;

New land use category is not required based on examination of existing uses, natural resources, and adequacy of adopted protections for resources on these 48 properties in context, and generally.

Page 18: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

18

Requested Action

Authorize staff to:

Initiate amendments as part of upcoming small and large scale amendment cycles to correct Preservation designation to Rural/Agriculture on Future Land Use Map.

Work with Chacala Pond owners on appropriate strategy for resource protection, such as C-1 zoning or other tools.

Page 19: 1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, 2006 1:30 PM

19

Conclusion of Presentation

Questions or comments?

Discussion?