1. monitor the monitor responses to the no inputs are ...€¦ · alvin pratt, apc . air pollution...

15
N A S H V I L L E E N V I R O N M E N T A L F I E L D O F F I C E 711 R. S. GASS BOULEVARD NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37216 PHONE (615) 687-7000 November 7, 2018 Gillian Walsh-Langford Air Monitoring Program Metro Public Health Department 2500 Charlotte Avenue Nashville, Tennessee 37209 Subject: 3 rd Quarter audits for 2018 Dear Ms. Walshe-Langford: This report contains the results of performance audits conducted by personnel from Tennessee’s Air Quality Assurance program. The audits were conducted on August 22 nd , 23 rd , an 24 th , 2018. The audits were conducted on all gaseous and particulate monitors located throughout the Metropolitan Davidson County area. The sites visited were East Health Center, Lockeland Elementary School and the Near Road Site off of Elm Hill Boulevard. All particulate monitors passed critical criteria and were within audit guidelines. The NO2 monitor at East was experiencing major flow problems and was not audited. The CO monitor at Near Road did not pass the zero and Level 2 audit challenges. The voltage on the Mother Board was noted to be fluctuating widely. The monitor was scheduled to be replaced. General audit procedures are set forth in 40CFR58 (Code of Federal Regulations). Appendix A, Section 3.1.2.1 of this CFR contains a chart which shows the audit levels for which ozone, SO2, CO, and NO2 monitors may be evaluated. Appendix A also contains the requirements for auditing particulate samplers. The continuous gaseous monitors were audited with an Environics 6103 calibrator certified against an NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) flow standard and a certified Level 2 ozone standard. The particulate monitors were audited with an NIST traceable flow system. All continuous monitors were audited Through the Probe and all sample lines and filters. The following points were observed and addressed during the audits: 1. For the Near Road NO2 monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are shown on the audit form as a comparison because the NO response usually mirrors the NO2 response. 2. The NO monitor at East had previously shown flow issues with the capillaries. An on-site test the previous day had shown an error of -34%. A one point check with my calibrator at .390 ppm resulted in a response of .273 ppm, or -30%. No further auditing was attempted. Ongoing repairs of the monitor were in progress. 3. The CO monitor at Near Road has had a history of the zero readily drifting. The change during the audit was from .040 ppm to .090 ppm. This response exceeded the allowable of .031 ppm for a zero value. The monitor also exceeded the allowable response for a Level 2 audit as defined in 40CFR58, Appendix A. A check of the main voltages on the front panel of the monitor revealed the Mother Board exhibiting a very unstable voltage pattern. A recommendation to exchange the monitor for a new one was made and accepted at the time of the audit. Any questions concerning these audits may be directed to this office at (615) 687-7045 or to: [email protected]. Sincerely, Radford L. Strong Environmental Specialist TDEC Tech Services QA Electronic copies to: Cc: Michelle Oakes, APC Alvin Pratt, APC

Upload: others

Post on 21-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

N A S H V I L L E E N V I R O N M E N T A L F I E L D O F F I C E

711 R. S. GASS BOULEVARD NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37216

PHONE (615) 687-7000 November 7, 2018

Gillian Walsh-Langford Air Monitoring Program Metro Public Health Department 2500 Charlotte Avenue Nashville, Tennessee 37209

Subject: 3rd

Quarter audits for 2018

Dear Ms. Walshe-Langford:

This report contains the results of performance audits conducted by personnel from Tennessee’s Air Quality Assurance program. The audits were conducted on August 22

nd, 23

rd, an 24

th, 2018. The audits were conducted on all gaseous and particulate monitors

located throughout the Metropolitan Davidson County area. The sites visited were East Health Center, Lockeland Elementary School and the Near Road Site off of Elm Hill Boulevard. All particulate monitors passed critical criteria and were within audit guidelines. The NO2 monitor at East was experiencing major flow problems and was not audited. The CO monitor at Near Road did not pass the zero and Level 2 audit challenges. The voltage on the Mother Board was noted to be fluctuating widely. The monitor was scheduled to be replaced.

General audit procedures are set forth in 40CFR58 (Code of Federal Regulations). Appendix A, Section 3.1.2.1 of this CFR contains a chart which shows the audit levels for which ozone, SO2, CO, and NO2 monitors may be evaluated. Appendix A also contains the requirements for auditing particulate samplers. The continuous gaseous monitors were audited with an Environics 6103 calibrator certified against an NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) flow standard and a certified Level 2 ozone standard. The particulate monitors were audited with an NIST traceable flow system.

All continuous monitors were audited Through the Probe and all sample lines and filters.

The following points were observed and addressed during the audits:

1. For the Near Road NO2 monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are shown on the audit form as a comparison because the NO response usually mirrors the NO2 response.

2. The NO monitor at East had previously shown flow issues with the capillaries. An on-site test the previous day had shown an error of -34%. A one point check with my calibrator at .390 ppm resulted in a response of .273 ppm, or -30%. No further auditing was attempted. Ongoing repairs of the monitor were in progress.

3. The CO monitor at Near Road has had a history of the zero readily drifting. The change during the audit was from .040 ppm to .090 ppm. This response exceeded the allowable of .031 ppm for a zero value. The monitor also exceeded the allowable response for a Level 2 audit as defined in 40CFR58, Appendix A. A check of the main voltages on the front panel of the monitor revealed the Mother Board exhibiting a very unstable voltage pattern. A recommendation to exchange the monitor for a new one was made and accepted at the time of the audit.

Any questions concerning these audits may be directed to this office at (615) 687-7045 or to: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Radford L. Strong Environmental Specialist TDEC Tech Services QA

Electronic copies to:

Cc: Michelle Oakes, APC Alvin Pratt, APC

Page 2: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0023 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/24/2018

Remarks:

1. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. As a separate note, the Casio watch receives a nightly signal from the Fort Collins, Colorado Observatory, which is the same source for the official time displayed at time.gov. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Critical Criteria

Type: TEOM PM2.5

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: 1405A231091503

Serial Number: C 150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor Response

Difference Acceptable Range

Level*

Sample Flow: 3.01 3.00 -0.33% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Bypass Flow:

+/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Total Flow: 16.49 16.68 1.27% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure: 750 747 -3 +/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature: 26.40 27.80 1.40 +/- 2.1ºC

Clock Time: 12:59:00 12:59:00 00:00:00 +/- 5:00 minutes

Audit notes:

Page 3: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0023 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 8/24/2018

Remarks:

1. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Critical Criteria

Type: TEOM PM10

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: 1405A130201311

Serial Number: C 150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor

Response Difference

Acceptable Range

Level*

Sample Flow: 3.00 3.00 0.00% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Bypass Flow:

+/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Total Flow: 16.80 16.70 -0.60% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure: 750 743 -7 +/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature: 28.20 28.20 0.00 +/- 2.1ºC

Clock Time: 13:09:00 13:09:00 00:00:00 +/- 5:00 minutes

Audit notes:

Page 4: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0023 POC1 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/24/2018

Remarks:

1. With the sample being taken, no leak check was performed. Entries in the logbook showed previous leak checks to be passing.

2. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Type: 2025 POC 1

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: 2025IW20781504

Serial Number: C150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor

Response Difference Acceptable Range Level*

Sample Flow: 16.66 16.66 0.00% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure: 750 749 -1 +/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature: 27.60 27.00 -0.60 +/- 2.1ºC

Leak Check

> 25 mm Hg

Clock Time: 12:42:00 12:42:00 0:00:00 +/- 01:00 minutes

Audit notes: No leak check; sample running. Previous monthly checks all passed.

Page 5: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0023 POC 2 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/24/2018

Remarks:

1. Logbook entries clear and up to date. 2. Monitor is clean and in good running order.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Type: 2025i

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: 2025I202241204

Serial Number:

C150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor

Response Difference Acceptable Range Level*

Sample Flow: 16.72 16.67 -0.30% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure: 750 746 -4 +/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature: 27.30 26.80 -0.50 +/- 2.1ºC

Leak Check

6 mm > 25 mm Hg

Clock Time: 12:49:00 12:49:00 0:00:00 +/- 00:01:00

minutes

Audit notes:

Page 6: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Near Road Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0040 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/23/2018

Remarks: 1. With the sample being taken, no leak check was performed. Entries in the logbook showed previous leak checks to be

passing. 2. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2017

Type: 2025i PM2.5

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: 2025i2 0216204

Serial Number:

C 150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor

Response Difference Acceptable Range Level*

Sample Flow: 16.66 16.68 0.12% +/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure: 750 747 3 +/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature: 27.20 27.20 0.00 +/- 2.1ºC

Filter Temperature:

0.00 +/- 2.1ºC

Leak Check

> 25 mm Hg

Clock Time: 14:44:00 14:44:00 0:00:00 +/- 01:00 minutes

Audit notes: No leak check or filter temp: sample running. Previous leak checks passed.

Page 7: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0023 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 8/24/2018

Type: BAM 1022 REMOVED FROM SERVICE

Audit Equipment:

Streamline Pro Cert Date:

09-Feb-18

Serial Number: T23706

Serial Number: C 150306

Measured Parameter Audit Value Monitor

Response Difference Acceptable Range Level*

Sample Flow:

+/- 4.1% (5.1%)

Barometric Pressure:

+/- 10.1 mm

Ambient Temperature:

+/- 2.1ºC

Leak Check

> 1 LPM

Clock Time:

+/- 05:00 minutes

Audit notes:

Remarks:

1. Removed from Service.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Streamline Pro C150306, and Casio Waveceptor watch were used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 8: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Near Road NO Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0040 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 8/23/2018

Type: Thermo 42i TL

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1324658812

Scott-Marrin FF39468 NO 19.87 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 0 0 0.0% < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

10/10L 20 18.5 -7.50% < ± 15.1 %

40/10L 79 75 -5.06% < ± 15.1 %

80/10L 158 152 -3.80% < ± 15.1 %

200/10L 390 378 -3.08% < ± 15.1 %

Audit notes: Included for comparison purposes.

Remarks: 1. The audit observations for the NO (nitric oxide) are included because the monitor response for NO is often

comparable to the monitor response to NO2 2. Monitor responses for NOx were several ppb lower than the responses for NO. These values were recorded in the

logbook. 3. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. The concentration for NOx should never be lower than the concentration NO. This relationship should be kept in mind for all calibrations, precision and span checks.

Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 9: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Near Road NO2 Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0040 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/23/2018

Type: Thermo 42i TL

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1324658812

Scott-Marrin FF39468 NO 19.87 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 0 0 0.0 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

200/10000 125 119 -4.80% < ± 15.1 % 7

60/10000 79 79 -0.00% < ± 15.1 % 6

30/10000 38 38 -0.00% < ± 15.1 % 5

Audit notes: Converter efficiency: 101.3%

Remarks:

1. Please see the “Remarks” for the NO report. The audit observations for the NO (nitric oxide) are included because the monitor response for NO is often comparable to the monitor response to NO2.

2. Logbook complete and up to date. Recommendations:

1. The concentration for NOx should never be lower than the concentration NO. This relationship should be kept in mind for all calibrations, precision and span checks.

Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 10: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Near Road CO Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0040 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/23/2018

Type: Thermo 48i TLE

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1172850016

Scott-Marrin FF 39468 CO 198.7 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 0 0.09 0.090 < ±.031ppm Zero

10 cc/10 L 0.195 0.280 0.085 < ±.031 ppm 2

40 cc/10L 0.799 0.899 12.52% < ± 15.1 % 3

80 cc/10L 1.190 1.270 6.72% < ± 15.1 % 4

200 cc/10L 3.856 4.070 5.55% < ± 15.1 % 5

Audit notes: Zero and Level 2 responses are too high. Voltage on mother board is unstable. Monitor to be replaced.

Remarks:

1. See the above audit notes. 2. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. Investigate cause of mother board voltage issue and/or replace monitor. Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit.

Page 11: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: Percy Priest Dam Ozone Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0026 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/24/2018

Type: Thermo 49i

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1322458652

Ozone Set/Dilution Air Audit Value Monitor Response % Difference Acceptable

Range Level *

0 ppb per 10.0 LPM 0 -3 -3 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

40 ppb per 10.0 LPM 42 39 -7.14% < ± 10.1 % 4

80 ppb per 10.0 LPM 84 81 -3.57% < ± 10.1 % 5

120 ppb per 10.0 LPM 128 125 -2.34% < ± 10.1 % 7

400 ppb per 10.0 LPM 401 398 -0.75%

Site Temperature: 23.9 Deg. C 23.2 Deg C 0.7 Deg. C ± 2.1 Deg. C

Audit notes:

Remarks:

1. *Shelter Temperature evaluated using Streamline Pro SN C150306. 2. Improving the zero response would bring all the monitor responses in line with the audit values. 3. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. None Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit.

Page 12: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: East Health Center SO2 Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0011 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/14/2018

Type: Thermo 43i

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1303156453

Scott-Marrin FF 39468 SO2 20.43 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 0 0 0 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

200cc/10L 399 415 4.01% < ± 15.1 % 9

60cc/10L 122 127 4.10% < ± 15.1 % 7

30cc/10L 40 41 2.50% < ± 15.1 % 6

10cc/20L 10.0 10.5 5.0% < ± 15.1% 4

Site Temperature: 23.3 Deg. C 21.9 Deg. C 1.4 Deg. C ± 2.1 Deg. C

Audit notes: Site temperature was checked by Streamline Pro C150306.

Remarks:

1. No moisture in lines this audit. 2. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations: None Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 and Streamline Pro SN C150306 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit.

Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 13: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: East Health Center NO Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0011 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/22/2018

Type: Thermo 42i TL

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1153030011

Scott-Marrin FF 39468 NO 19.87 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 0 -0.3 -0.3 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

200/10000 390 273 -30% < ± 15.1 %

60/10000 < ± 15.1 %

30/10000 < ± 15.1 %

10/10000 < ± 15.1 %

Site Temperature: 23.9 Deg. C 23.2 Deg C 0.7 Deg. C ± 2.1 Deg. C

Audit notes: Flow issues discussed; capillaries cleaned, flows went from too low to too high. Operator check from previous day was at -34%. No further audit was attempted.

Remarks:

1. See audit notes above.

2. Logbook complete and up to date.

Recommendations:

1. Replace capillaries and recalibrate. This was scheduled for the next day. Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 and Streamline Pro SN C150306 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 14: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: East Health Center NO2 Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0011 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 08/22/2018

Type: Thermo 42i TL

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number 1153030011

Scott-Marrin FF 39468 NO 19.87 PPM

06-Sep-20

Measured Parameter sccm

Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0/10000 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

200/10000 < ± 15.1 % 7

60/10000 < ± 15.1 % 6

30/10000 < ± 15.1 % 5

Site Temperature: ± 2.1 Deg. C

Audit notes:

Remarks:

1. See notes for NO monitor results. Recommendations:

1. See Recommendations for NO monitor. Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 and Streamline Pro SN C150306 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018

Page 15: 1. monitor the monitor responses to the NO inputs are ...€¦ · Alvin Pratt, APC . Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit Site: Lockeland Audit Quarter:

Air Pollution Control Division Quality Assurance Performance Audit

Site: East Health Center Ozone Audit Quarter: 3Q 2018 AQS #: 47-037-0011 Auditor: Radford Strong Date of Audit: 8/22/2018

Type: Thermo 49i

Audit Equipment:

Environics 6103 SN 6371

Serial Number CM09130037

Ozone Set/Dilution Air Audit Value Monitor

Response % Difference

Acceptable Range

Level *

0 ppb per 10.0 LPM 0 -1 1 < ± 3.1 ppb Zero

40 ppb per 10.0 LPM 38 36 -5.26% < ± 10.1 % 4

80 ppb per 10.0 LPM 79 75 -5.06 < ± 10.1 % 5

120 ppb per 10.0 LPM 118 112 -5.08 < ± 10.1 % 7

400 ppb per 10.0 LPM 386 371 -3.89 < ± 10.1 % 10+

Site Temperature:

± 2.1 Deg. C

Audit notes:

Remarks: Logbook complete and up to date. Recommendations: None.

Audit Equipment: Environics 6103 SN 6371 and Streamline Pro SN C150306 was used by Quality Assurance personnel to conduct this audit. Report Date: 11/08/2018