1. introduction 2. fitting 3. monte carlo simulations conclusions of … · colour difference...
TRANSCRIPT
Determination of the redshift of an
invisible lens
Christophe Jean and Jean Surdej
Institut d'Astrophysique, Université de Liège, Belgium
1. Introduction
2. Fitting
3. Monte Carlo Simulations
4. Conclusions
Observer
Introduction
Deflectorz r, Ra,
Quasar
Flux received bv the observer from component i at the wavelength À:
F^,i : F| An"-Ext(À" Rv)Lt
with { the flux emitted by the quasar;
Ai the magnification of component i;\
trxt(À/ , Rv) the extinction (À' : , , , Rv is a parameter);' I * zt,and Li the path length of component i through the deflector.
We assume no contamination, no intrinsic colour variations between
the components, no micro-iensing effects and that the extinction is
taking place in a single lensing plane.
Colour difference between component i and a reference component is
then:
(lVlsr,t - fuIb,n) - (Mn,ref - M^r,,.f) :)5
ft LilBxr(Àî, Ârr) - Ext (À'r, Rv))
with Mx, - M^, : -2.5f "* (+)\- ^2,/
and Lt : Li - Lr.r.
Fitting
(Mxr,,i - Msr,n) - (M>,r,ref - M^r,r.f) :
Experimental colour
frfr Lillxt(À'r, Rr) - Ext (^!r, Rr)l
For the fitted colour:
o Ext(Ài , Rv) - Ext (À'r, Rv) is computed for different contiguous
values of Rv and z1;
. L,; is fitted by u routine for each selected (Rv,rt) point in order
to minimize:
(trxperimental colour - Fitted colour)2x'-D ,()r- E-x perrmenl al colour
Ax'
ZS
map is thus obtained:
21
0.01
06
Fitted colour
r.05 RV
Monte Carlo Simulations
Study of the errors affecting the determination of the lens redshift
from a set of 100 simulations. Gaussian noise was added to the
simulated magnitudes of the 4 selected components.
5 filters: UBVRI
0.1 5:t:i--tr
norse.noise:noise:noise:noise:
0.010.020.030.040.05
----x---magmagmagmagmag
I/ll
,r-ry-,.x,
. -l'i!rrr!Y:Ufl-N!, rç*'^liiâé?:r". *]!.t:,' //-' . t':!!!1,'
, t EY.,-** ç1;,;--çi"-o 7-?*^=I: :Ï:::
t'l'1lotrul.-t
la-xxx-ri
0.1b
0.05
00 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
z1
Gaussian noise. 0.01 mao
0.1
b
0.01
0.0010.5 1.5
Z1
2.5
Gaussian noise: 0.01 mag
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
01 1.5 2 2.5
z1
XJ
^xxxx)<xxv,.x
X XX--
UBVR| _IJHKL
k\ t- ' "--
z-r.X\,
X.,^X-X X-X X-X
x*-**"**l
*:-!--++
5 filters: UBVRI7 filters: UBVRIJH
9 filters: UBVRIJHKL
Ii
T
\/,*\',,,x i*r\
,ï\
0.5
Conclusions
Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the redshift of an invisible
lens can be retrieved with this method provided that we have
accurate photometric observations of the macro-lensed images.
This method is particularly sensitive to the redshift of the deflector
and thus offers an original way of determining the redshift of an
invisible lens.
High quality photometric data (o = 0.01 mag) are badly needed.
Photometry for at least 5 broad band filters is necessary.