1 camp hill infants state school …… where boys fly high too!
TRANSCRIPT
1
Camp Hill Infants State School ……
where boys fly high too!
2
Background
• Improve learning outcomes
• Introduce Prep Trial
• Infant School status
3
An Audit
• Year 2 Net results
• School Opinion Survey
• Community scan
4
Year 2 Diagnostic Net for Reading Children not requiring support
73.1
81.3
95.9
0102030405060708090
100
2000 2001 2002Children EQ target
All children except those ascertained Level 6 Intellectual Impairment are included in these results.
5
Year 2 Diagnostic Net for ReadingBoys not requiring support
63.476.9
88.4
0102030405060708090
100
2000 2001 2002Boys EQ target
All boys except those ascertained Level 6 Intellectual Impairment are included in these results.
6
Year 2 Diagnostic Net Boys and Girls not requiring support
63.4 76.9 88.4
83.8 86.1 83.7
0102030405060708090
100
2000 2001 2002
Boys Girls
All children except those ascertained Level 6 Intellectual Impairment are included in these results.
7
Data source: Corporate Data Warehouse
87.9 62.2 87.2 90.2
0
1020
3040
50
6070
8090
100
Staff Morale SupportResources &
Training
Work Value &Recognition
Relationships
Staff Opinion Survey
2002
8
Data source: Corporate Data Warehouse
2002 School Survey
Satisfaction of Parents
78.2 91.3
0102030405060708090
100
good education good school
9Improved student outcomes are built on strong foundations
B. Fluckiger. Camp Hill Infants State School
Improve Learning
Outcomes
Refine Teaching and Learning
Build Organisational Capacity
Establish External Support
10
School community
Critical friend
11
Critical Friend
• develops trust • asks provocative questions • examines data through another lens• offers critiques of work, projects• takes the time to
- understand the context- understand the vision, journey
• advocates for us and our success
12
Camp Hill Infants State School Observation of Literacy/Numeracy Lessons
Productive PedagogyC
ult
ura
l K
no
wle
dg
es
Inc
lus
ivit
y
Na
rra
tiv
e
Gro
up
Ide
nti
ty
Ac
tiv
e C
itiz
en
sh
ip
Kn
ow
led
ge
Inte
gra
tio
n
Ba
ck
gro
un
d K
no
wle
dg
e
Co
nn
ec
ted
ne
ss
to
th
e W
orl
d
Pro
ble
m-b
as
ed
cu
rric
ulu
m
De
ep
Kn
ow
led
ge
De
ep
Un
de
rsta
nd
ing
Su
bs
tan
tiv
e C
on
ve
rsa
tio
n
Kn
ow
led
ge
as
Pro
ble
ma
tic
Me
tala
ng
ua
ge
Hig
he
r O
rde
r T
hin
kin
g
Stu
de
nt
Dir
ec
tio
n
So
cia
l Su
pp
ort
Ac
ad
em
ic E
ng
ag
em
en
t
Ex
plic
it Q
ua
lity
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e C
rite
ria
Se
lf R
eg
ula
tio
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Recognition Connectedness Intellectual Quality Supportive difference Class Environment
Per
cen
tag
e
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
97.591.3 95 97.3 100
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
%SC3.1 Percentage of parent/caregivers satisfied
that the school is a good school.
25
LE2.1: Percentages of parents and caregivers satisfied that children are getting a good education at this school.
78.2 80 94.9 86.8 90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
26
Staff Opinion Survey
Work Value & Recognition
75.36692.272.387.2
0102030405060708090
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
27
Staff Opinion Survey
Staff Morale
87.9 84.6 91.5 81.3 89
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
28
Staff Opinion Survey
Support, Resources & Training
62.2 72.9 82.256.7 64.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
29
School Opinion Survey
Relationships
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
90.2 87.1 93.1 86.6 93.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
30
=
• Aim, Shared Vision, Purpose
• Knowledge and Skills
• Motivation “buy in”
• Resources
• Action Plan Goals Organisation
• Data
Supporting Change
31
Year 2 Diagnostic Net Children not requiring support
73.1
81.3
85.9
83.1
90.2
89.9
74.5
0102030405060708090
100
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
CHISS State
All children except those ascertained Level 6 Intellectual Impairment are included in these results.
32
Year 2 Diagnostic Net Boys not requiring support
63.4
76.9
88.4
83.7
91.4
90.3
71.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
CHISS State
All boys except those ascertained Level 6 Intellectual Impairment are included in these results.
33
34
Capes??