07ch04ethics-ch 4

23
1 Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 – ETHICS AND SAFETY CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Upload: gaurav-mehta

Post on 28-Mar-2015

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

1

Chapter 4

CHAPTER 4 – ETHICS AND SAFETY

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 2: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

2

Chapter 4

An Ethical Dilemma - Example

Southland Prestressed Concrete (SPC) company has been awarded a contract to build an ultramodern multistory shopping mall.

“The University Mall” is the largest contract SPC has ever undertaken.

In order to win the contract SPC’s Vice President had to a agree to a completion date, that if not reasonable, is at least going to be challenging.

In addition, all exposed concrete surfaces must be sprayed with a specified paint that is highly toxic and difficult to apply.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 3: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

3

Chapter 4

An Ethical Dilemma - Example SPC’s subcontractor has never used this particular type of

paint before. Personal protective equipment and other engineering

controls can minimize the potential hazards, but all precautions must be stringently observed with absolutely no shortcuts.

The manufacturer of the paint recommends 3 full days of training for all employees who will work with the paint.

The recommended training cannot be provided soon enough to fit into SPC’s expedited schedule for this job.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 4: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

4

Chapter 4

An Ethical Dilemma - Example

In a secret meeting, SPC’s executive managers decide to purchase the necessary personal protective equipment, use the toxic paint as specified and forgo the recommended training.

In addition, the executives decide to withhold from employees all information about the toxicity of the paint.

Safety engineer was not invited to the secret meeting however the decision made during the meeting were slipped to him anonymously.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 5: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

5

Chapter 4

An Ethical Dilemma - Example

Safety engineer faces an ethical dilemma:– If he chooses to do nothing, employees might be

inappropriately exposed to a highly dangerous substance.

– If he shares what he knows with the subcontractor, he might be called upon to testify about what he knows; a step that could cost him his job and threaten his career.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 6: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

6

Chapter 4

Definitions

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Ethics – the study of morality within a context established by cultural and professional values, social norms, and accepted standards of behavior

Morality – the values that are subscribed to and fostered by society in general. – Ethical behavior falls within the limits prescribed by morality.

Ethical questions are rarely black and white. They typically fall into a gray area between two extremes of right and wrong. – Personal experience, self-interest, point of view, and

external pressure often cloud this gray area even further.

Page 7: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

7

Chapter 4

Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Guidelines are needed when trying to sort out matters that are not clearly right or wrong.

It is necessary to distinguish between the concepts of legal and ethical.– Just because an option is legal does not necessarily mean it is

ethical. Guidelines for determining ethical behavior assuming

that the behavior in question is legal.– “Morning After Test”

• How will you feel the morning after?

– “Front Page Test” • Would it embarrass you if it were a story on the front page of the

newspaper?

Page 8: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

8

Chapter 4

Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior

– Mirror Test”• How will you feel about yourself when you look in the

mirror?

– “Role-Reversal Test”• Trade places with the people affected by your decision and

view the decision through their eyes.

– “Common-Sense Test” • Listen to your instincts and common sense. If it feels

wrong, it probably is.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 9: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

9

Chapter 4

Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior Blanchard and Peale suggest their own

testing for deciding ethical choice in a given situation:– Is it legal?

• If an action is not legal, it is also not ethical.

– Is it balanced?• If an action is balanced, it is fair to all involved

– How will it make me feel about myself?• If a course of action is in keeping with our own moral

structure, it will make you feel good about yourself.CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 10: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

10

Chapter 4

Five P’s of Ethical Power

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

1. Purpose: Individuals see themselves as ethical people who let their conscience be their guide and, in all cases, want to feel good about themselves.

2. Pride: Individuals apply internal guidelines and have sufficient self-esteem to make decisions that may not be popular with others.

3. Patience: Individual believe right will prevail in the long run, and they are willing to wait when necessary.

4. Persistence: Individuals are willing to stay with an ethical course of action once it has been chosen and to see it through to a positive conclusion.

5. Perspective: Individuals take the time to reflect and are guided by their own internal barometer when making ethical decisions.

Page 11: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

11

Chapter 4

Ethical Behavior in Organizations Trevino suggest ethical behavior in organizations is influenced

by individual factors and social factors. Individual Factors:– Ego Strength

• Ability to undertake tasks and cope with tense situations

– Machiavellianism

• Attempt to deceive

– Locus of control

• Workers’ perspective on who controls their behavior (Internal or External)

Social Factors: Gender, age, work experience, influence of people, etc. People learn appropriate behavior by observing the behavior of

significant role models.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 12: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

12

Chapter 4

Construction Professionals and Ethics Knowing what is ethical is easier than actually

doing it. Construction professionals should,

1. Set an example

2. Help employees facing ethical questions in decision making

3. Help employees undertake the chosen ethical option.

One of the following approaches can be adapted:– Best-ratio approach– Black-and-white approach– Full potential approach

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 13: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

13

Chapter 4

Best-Ratio Approach Pragmatic option Sometimes referred to as situational ethics. People are basically good Under certain conditions, people may be driven to unethical

behavior. Construction professionals should do everything possible to

create conditions that promote ethical behavior and try to maintain the highest possible ratio of good choices to bad.

When hard decisions must be made, the appropriate choice is the one that does the most good for most people.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 14: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

14

Chapter 4

Black-and-White Approach

Right is right, wrong is wrong. Circumstances are irrelevant Construction professional’s job is to make ethical

decisions and carry them out and, in addition to help employees choose the ethical route.

When difficult decisions must be made, construction professionals should make fair and impartial choices regardless of outcomes.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 15: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

15

Chapter 4

Full-Potential Approach

Decisions are made based on how the outcomes affect the ability of individuals to achieve their full potential.

People are responsible for realizing their full potential within the confines of morality.

Choices that can achieve this goal without infringing on the rights of others are considered ethical.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 16: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

16

Chapter 4

Approaches

Decisions made may differ, depending on the approach selected.

In the case study of Southland Prestressed Concrete (SPC) company,– If the safety engineer applies the best-ratio approach, he

may decide to keep quiet, encourage the proper usage of personal protective equipment, and hope for the best.

– If he takes the black-and-white approach, he will be compelled to confront the SPC’s management team with what he knows.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 17: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

17

Chapter 4

Company’s Role in Ethics

Construction companies, have a critical role to play in promoting ethical behavior among their employees.

Construction professionals cannot set ethical examples alone or expect employees to behave ethically in a vacuum.

A company’s role in ethics can be summarized as:1. Creating an internal environment that promotes, expects, and

rewards ethical behavior.

2. Setting an example of ethical behavior in all external dealings.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 18: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

18

Chapter 4

Creating an Ethical Environment

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Companies create an ethical environment by establishing policies and practices that ensure that all employees are treated ethically and then enforcing these policies.

Companies can create an ethics policy– “J. R. Makin Construction Company will conduct its

business in strict compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, corporate policies, procedures, and guidelines. We will conduct all business with honesty, integrity, and a strong commitment to the highest standards of ethics. We have a duty to conduct our business with both the letter and the spirit of the law.”

Page 19: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

19

Chapter 4

Setting an Ethical Example

Companies that take the “do as I say, not as I do” approach to ethics do not succeed.

Employees must be able to trust their company leaders to conduct all external and internal dealings in an ethical manner.

Companies must support employees who make ethically correct decisions.– In the case study of Southland Prestressed Concrete (SPC)

company, higher management must stand behind the safety manager if he decides to confront the management team.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Page 20: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

20

Chapter 4

Handling Ethical Dilemmas

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Steps of handling ethical dilemmas:

1. Apply the guidelines to determine what is ethical.1. Use the simple tests

2. Goal is to identify the ethical choice.

2. Select the Approach1. Consider the best ratio, black-and-white, and full potential

approaches

2. Personal makeup, expectations of the company, degree of company support affect the decision.

3. Proceeding with the Decision1. Proceed in strict accordance with the approach selected

2. Consistency is critical when handling ethical dilemmas.

Page 21: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

21

Chapter 4

Whistle-Blowing

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Whistle-blowing – the act of informing an outside authority or media organ of alleged illegal or unethical acts on the part of an organization or individual.

Problems with whistle-blowing:1. Retribution2. Damaged relationships and hostility3. Loss of focus4. Scapegoating

Page 22: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

22

Chapter 4

OSHA and Whistle-Blowing

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety

Employee protection provisions– Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act (ERA)– This statute makes it illegal for an employer covered by the

act to discharge an employee or otherwise discriminate against an employee in terms of compensation, conditions, or privileges of the employment because the employee or any person acting at an employee’s request performs a protected activity.

Employers covered by the ERA include the following:

– Licensees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or an agreement state (including applicants for a license)

– A contractor or subcontractor of a licensee or applicant– A contractor or subcontractor of the Department of Energy

Page 23: 07Ch04Ethics-CH 4

23

Chapter 4

OSHA and Whistle-Blowing Key provisions to the ERA:

1. Every employee has the right to raise a safety concern2. Unlawful acts by employers in the form of intimidation,

threatening, restrain, coerce, blacklist, discharge, or discriminate any employees

3. Complaints by an employee or representative may be filed up to 180 days of the action.

4. Enforcement – if the employers cannot provide clear evidence of no violation, OSHA performs an investigation.

5. Relief – if found in violation, the employer must provide appropriate relief in the form of reinstatement, back wages, compensation for injuries, and attorney’s fees and costs.

CEE 698 – Construction Health and Safety