05 30 16 sign regulation after reed
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Sign Regulation After ReedHector de la Mora, Von Briesen & Roper SCDouglas Hoffer, Eau Claire Assistant City Attorney
![Page 2: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Have you revised your sign code post Reed? “It is nearly certain that every sign code
in the United States has a provision that is now legally questionable after Reed.”
Daniel M. Olson “Sign Regulation and Reed v. Town of Gilbert,” the Municipality, November 2015
![Page 3: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Town of Gilbert Sign Regulation
![Page 4: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Reed sign – violated code
![Page 5: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reed permissible political signs
![Page 6: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
More political signs
![Page 7: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
More political signs
![Page 8: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
More political signs
![Page 9: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1st Amendment Considerations Not all content protected Content based speech regulations are presumptively
unconstitutional Content based laws will be upheld only if they are the
least restrictive means of achieving a compelling state interest
Commercial speech generally implicates lower level of scrutiny
Content neutral speech regulation is subject to lesser (intermediate) scrutiny Law upheld provided it is narrowly tailored to serve a
significant governmental interest
![Page 10: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Reed Summary Decision reaffirmed the principle that
content based regulations are subject to strict scrutiny and presumptively unconstitutional
Majority opinion resolved the circuit split by requiring both facial content neutrality and a neutral purpose AND determined that a regulation’s purpose is irrelevant if the regulation is not neutral on its face.
![Page 11: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Reed Summary cont’d Categorical signs, such as directional
signs, real estate signs, political signs, etc. are content based where they are defined by aspects of the sign’s message.
Regulations purporting to be speaker based may be considered content based and subject to strict scrutiny.
![Page 12: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Provisions Your Sign Code Should Include Strong Purpose Statement
Reference comprehensive plan purpose Reference relevant studies (traffic safety, blight
elimination, impact on property values, etc.) Reference relevant laws supporting
governmental purposes (statutes, case law, etc.)
Substitution Clause (allowing non-commercial substitution)
Severability Clause
![Page 13: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Provisions Your Code Should Remove or Avoid Content based distinctions
Ex. Political signs, real estate signs, etc. Signs exempt from regulation or permitting
due to type of sign Different treatment for different types of
signs Different treatment based on content of sign
Provisions conflicting with Wis. Stat. § 12.04 (political signs).
![Page 14: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Provisions Your Code Likely Can Include Alito Concurrence
Rules regulating size of signs Rules regulating location of signs Rules distinguishing between lighted and
unlighted signs Rules distinguishing between fixed and
electronic/rotating messages Rules distinguishing between sign
placement on private and public property
![Page 15: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Provisions Your Code Likely Can Include Alito Concurrence Cont’d:
Rules distinguishing between sign placement on commercial and residential property
Rules distinguishing between on-premises and off-premises signs.
Rules restricting the total number of signs allowed per mile of roadway.
Rules imposing time restrictions on signs advertising a one-time event.
![Page 16: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Additional Considerations Suspend enforcement of provisions that
conflict with Reed Communicate with your Code Enforcement
officials Consider using Zoning Code as primary
vehicle to regulate signs Zoning districts include specific parameters for
Alito Concurrence categories Consider prohibition on signs within Right-Of-
Way
![Page 17: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Defending Your Sign Code Reed did not overrule any prior cases
See Agostini v. Felton (Implicit overruling is disfavored)
Many rules favor constitutionality Ordinances presumed constitutional (note 1st
amendment burden shifts) High burden to challenge constitutionality (beyond
reasonable doubt) Courts must construe ordinances to eliminate
constitutional infirmity Severability presumed
![Page 18: 05 30 16 Sign Regulation After Reed](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070509/58a5ebfc1a28aba5728b5059/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Recommended Reading IMLA model sign code (available online) Tribe, Laurence, Applying the First
Amendment to Regulations Distinguishing Between Off-premises and On-premises after Reed v. Town of Gilbert.
Connolly, Brian J. and Weinstein, Alan C., Sign Regulation After Reed: Suggestions for Coping with Legal Uncertainty. (available online).