01012012 a broken ethics process.short
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
1/30
TheCongressional
Ethics process
a case study on itsineffectiveness
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
2/30
The Rules
Article I, Section 5 of the United StatesConstitution provides that "Each House [of
Congress] may determine the Rules of itsproceedings, punish its members for disorderlybehavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member." The processes forexpulsion differ somewhat between the House ofRepresentatives and the Senate.
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
3/30
The rules
There are a series of rules that supposedly governthe conduct of members of Congress.
House Rules that limit the gifts that members ofCongress may accept in calendar year 2009 to $335.
Federal law (Ethics in Government Act) that requiresmembers of Congress file an annual FinancialDisclosure Form.
Requires reporting of gifts and loans received bymembers of Congress in preceding calendar yearwhether or not they exceed the gift limit.
The filing of a false Annual Financial Disclosure form isa felony violation of the Federal False StatementsAccountability Act.
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
4/30
The procedure
The consequence of a successful ethicsinvestigation and prosecution can be any of
Dismissal of the charges Formal reprimand by the House
Formal censure by the House
Expulsion from the House
The last member to be expelled from the U.S.
House of Representatives was James Traficant in2002
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
5/30
The record (expulsion)
In modern history, only two House members havebeen expelled:
Michael Myers, expelled in conjunction with takingbribes during the Abscam investigation
In 2002, James Traficant was expelled after felonyconvictions of bribery, racketeering and tax evasion
No Senators have been expelled in the 20th or 21
century
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
6/30
The Record (Censure) A Censure is a Congressional Procedure for reprimanding
the President, a Member of Congress or a Judge.
The U.S. House has censured five members since 1966: December 2010, Charles B. Rangel (breaking 11 separate
congressional rules related to his personal finances and hisfundraising efforts for a New York college)
1983, Daniel Crane, Sexual misconduct with CongressionalPages
1983, Gerry Studds, Sexual Misconduct with Congresisonal
Pages 1980, Charles Wilson, Improper Use of Campaign Funds
1979, Charles Diggs, Payroll fraud and mail fraud
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
7/30
The Record (Reprimand)
Reprimand is seen as a lesser form of reproval inthe House
2009, Joe Wilson for his you lie outburst whenPresident Obama spoke to Congress
1997, Newt Gingrich, use of tax exempt organizationfor political purposes and lying to House EthicsCommittee
1990, Barney Frank for using office to fix parkingtickets and influence probation officer
1987, Austin Murphy, allowing another peson to casthis vote
1984, George Hansen, False statements on financialdisclosure form
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
8/30
The Record
As this presentation shows using the case of JeanSchmidt, there is utterly no consequence to the
most outrageous, significant blatant violation ofHouse Rules or Federal law requiring thedisclosure of financial affairs.
Thus, the House has little more than an illusion ofan ethics process that is not only intentionally
toothless, it is designed to whitewash even themost outrageous conduct of members ofCongress, with only a very few exceptions.
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
9/30
The case of Jean Schmidt
Acceptance of third party payment of legal feesof a member of Congress is clearly a gift
Any gift over $335 is impermissible AND must bedisclosed disclosed on the members AnnualFinancial Disclosure form
From December 2008 through April of 2011, Jean
Schmidt accepted approximately $498,587 inthird party payments of her legal fees by theTurkish Coalition of America
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
10/30
The case of Jean Schmidt
Jean Schmidt failed to disclose the gifts ofhundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees on
her 2008, 2009, or 2010 Financial Disclosure Forms
She thus committed three felonies for her failureto disclose the gift
She violated House Rules by accepting the gifts
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
11/30
What happenedSchmidt v. Krikorian
In the closing days of the 2008 campaign, DavidKrikorian published certain statements about
Jean Schmidts relation to the Turkishgovernment, the Turkish lobby and a matterbefore Congress, being the Armenian GenocideResolution that the Turks vigorously opposed
The Turkish Coalition of America approached
Schmidt after the election and told her theywould represent her in pursuing David Krikorianand pay her legal fees for her
We have this under oath from her attorney
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
12/30
Schmidt knew who was paying her
legal feesIn December of 2008, Bruce Fein met with Jean Schmidt and told her theTurkish Coalition of America was going to pay her considerable legal feesarising from these proceedings:
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
13/30
KrikorianCounsel
Krikorianwasrepresentedby ChrisFinney and
celebrityattorneyMarkGeragos
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
14/30
Schmidt counsel
Schmidtrepresented by
team ofattorneysfunded by TCA,Bruce Fein and
David Saltzmanof D.C. andDonald Brey ofColumbus
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
15/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
Through 2009, Schmidt pursued Krikorian
Celebrity attorney Mark Geragos and localattorney Chris Finney represented Krikorian
There were depositions in the District ofColumbia, Cincinnati, and Columbus
Two days of trial
We knew hundreds of thousands of dollars inlegal fees were incurred. We knew the TCA waspaying these legal fees
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
16/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
In June of 2010, Jean SchmidtsCalendar year 2009 Financial Disclosure
Form was filed
She categorically stated she received nogifts, and had no outstandingindebtedness
Thus, she lied about who was paying herlegal fees and that she had received agift worth hundreds of thousands ofdollars
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
17/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case On July 13, 2010, David Krikorian filed a Complaint
with the Office of Congressional Ethics, the citizenscommittee complaining of the illegal gift
On May 18, 2011, the OCE reported to the HouseEthics Committee their findings that in fact the TCAwas impermissibly paying her legal fees
Schmidt received a copy that same day
On May 27, 2011, Schmidt wrote to the House EthicsCommittee saying she first learned who was payingher legal fees when Krikorian filed his Complaint inJuly of 2010
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
18/30
Schmidt admitted she knewwho was paying her lawyers
Excepts from Schmidt letter to the HouseEthics Committee dated May 27, 2011
referencing Complaint and media reportsfrom July of 2010
I would have learned of allegations thatTCA was paying TALDF lawyers for my
case directly at the same time and in thesame manner as the Committee throughpress reports and allegations set forth bythe Defendant in the Ohio cases.
-- Jean Schmidt
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
19/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
On June 14, 2011, fewer than three weeks afterJean Schmidt acknowledged in writing that she
now knew who was paying her legal fees, shefiled her Calendar Year 2010 Financial DisclosureForm with the House Clerk
Again, she claimed no gifts and no outstandingindebtedness
Thus for a third time, and this time irrefutably, shelied on her Financial Disclosure Form, a felonyand a violation of House Rules
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
20/30
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
21/30
She lied about loan sheclaimed two weeks earlier
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
22/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
The Office of Congressional Ethics found thatJean Schmidt had knowingly accepted an illegal
gift of nearly $500,000 and referred the matter forfurther action to the House Ethics Committee
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
23/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
Inexplicably, the House Ethics Committee foundthat while Jean Schmidt had accepted an
impermissible gift, she did not know of the gift,and thus did not violate House Rules
No one from the OCE or the House EthicsCommittee ever called Krikorian or his counsel toinvestigate the claims or defenses
But they did order her to do certain things toremedy the situation
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
24/30
House Ethics Cttee OrderedSchmidt on 8/45/11 to:
Amend her 09 & 10 Disclosure Forms toshow $500,000 in impermissible gifts
To immediately to repay ~$40,000 ofillegal gifts from her personal funds
To repay remaining $460,000 in
impermissible gifts
To re-pay the $460,000 when funds areavailable from a permissible source
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
25/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
As of December 31, 2011, four and a half monthslater, Schmidt has done nothing she was ordered
to do She has not amended her false financial disclosure
forms to show the impermissible gifts
She has not repaid the ~$40,000 that she wasordered to re-pay immediately
She has set up the Legal Expense Fund, and hasraised a total of $10 in it
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
26/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
CREW has named Jean Schmidt one of the 14most corrupt members of Congress
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
27/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
CREW has filed a supplemental complaint withthe OCE claiming (correctly) that Jean Schmidt
lied when she told the House Ethics Committeethat she did not know who was paying her legalfees.
CREW also asked that the FBI investigate her forlying to the House Ethics Committee and filing
false Financial Disclosure Forms, felonies
This is irrefutable as to her 2010 FinancialDisclosure Form filed in June of 2011.
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
28/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
To date, three full year after the illegal conductcommenced:
No one will take any enforcement action against her
She has thumbed her nose at the regulators, refusingto comply with their clear orders
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
29/30
What happenedJean Schmidt Ethics case
Once can reasonably conclude with respect tothe Congressional ethics process, that it is entirely
toothless, and in facts exists to exonerate andwhitewash the bad acts of members of Congress
The other agencies that would lock any of us upfor similar behaviors, the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, theIRS, the FEC have a hands off attitude towards
members of Congress
Thus, they may undertake the most outrageousacts with impunity
-
8/3/2019 01012012 a Broken Ethics Process.short
30/30
Congressional EthicsWhat you can do
Demand local newspapers cover misdeeds ofyour member of Congress
Write letters to the editor and blog entries on thetopic
Write to your Congressman demanding integrityin the Congressional ethics process
Write to members of the House Ethics Committeeto show you know of their toothless enforcementand demand more integrity in the process