第二章 tod 相關文獻回顧與分析 - 文化大學機構典藏...

30
大眾運輸導向發展引導都市空間再造之策略研究 第二章 TOD 相關文獻回顧與分析 2-1 第二章 TOD 相關文獻回顧與分析 本研究相關文獻回顧與分析分成四大部分進行研究,第一部分係藉由國內外 TOD 文獻中瞭解各國 TOD 相關研究的著力點,從中發現我國研究不足之處。第 二部分分析國內外 TOD 相關理論,以充分瞭解 TOD 引導都市空間發展之內涵。 第三部分為與 TOD 相關之新規劃理論的探討,包括:新都市主義、優質成長、 綠色交通,從中定位出 TOD 引導都市空間再造之引導方式,做為第四部分綜合 前三節論述,推衍出 TOD 引導都市空間再造之空間發展架構。 第一節 TOD 相關研究 本研究整理國內外 TOD 相關文獻,從中發展對於本論文的啟發,並比較國 TOD 研究之著力點,找出研究不足之處,並結合都市空間再造相關研究,進 一步分析與 TOD 相關之新規劃理論,做為本研究立論基礎。 一、以 TOD 為主之國內相關研究 TOD 為主之國內相關研究,以空間範圍區分為區域/都市與車站地區兩種 型態,並以土地使用、交通運輸、都市再發展、經濟等原則作為論述主軸。 ()TOD 應用於區域/都市為主題之國內研究 從「TOD 應用於區域/都市」為主題的研究中可得知, TOD 在有關區域/市空間規劃課題所歸結之問題包含:○ 1 缺乏區域/都市空間規劃之整體面與願景 面之思考、○ 2 缺乏多樣性的選擇(土地使用、交通運具、住宅選擇等)、○ 3 缺乏新 舊文化空間整合性思考等,對此將各篇國內著作對本研究之啟發(參見表 2-1)2-1 TOD 應用於區域/都市為主題之研究之國內相關研究彙整 作者 (年代) 題目(出處) 文獻重點 對本研究之啟發 杜雲龍 (2000) 大眾運輸導 向之都市發 展策略--淡海新市鎮 開發案為例 以永續發展理論為基礎,探 討大眾運輸與土地使用之關 係與大眾運輸村之概念,結 合新加坡案例研究,建立出 TOD 理論架構,並以台灣為 實證地區,提出適合台灣 TOD 在發展上的目標、方向 與策略。 導入永續發展與大眾運輸 村理念,透過實證研究建立 適合台灣都市發展 TOD 區域規劃與車站地區規劃 策略。

Upload: hanga

Post on 15-May-2019

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

TOD

2-1

TOD

TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD

TOD

TOD TOD TOD

TOD

TOD /

() TOD /

TOD / TOD /1 /2 ()3 ( 2-1)

2-1 TOD /

()

()

(2000)

--

TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

2-2

( 2-1)

()

(2001)

TOD

(2003)

(TOD

TOD

TOD

;

(2003)

TOD

(2004)

TOD

TOD

TOD

() TOD

TOD TOD 1 2

3 4

TOD

2-3

( 2-2)

2-2 TOD

()

()

(2003)

1

2

3

(2005)

750 TOD

TOD

TOD

(2005)

TOD

TOD

(2006)

TOD

TOD

2-4

( 2-2)

()

()

(2006)

TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

(2006)

-

TOD

TOD

TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD

() TOD

TOD TOD //1 2

TOD

2-5

3 TOD 4 TOD

TOD ( 2-3)

2-3 TOD

()

Calthorpe (1993)

The Next American Metropolis

TOD TOD

TOD

Marlon & Nicholas (1996)

Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego County: Incrementally Implementing a Comprehensive Idea

TOD

TOD

Nelson & Niles & Aharon (2001)

A New Planning Template for Transit-Oriented Development

Calthorpe TOD TODs TODs

TOD

TOD

TOD

Dena & Gerald (2002)

Transit Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality

TOD TOD 21

TOD

TOD

TOD

2-6

() TOD

TOD TOD //1 2 TOD //3 TOD(density)(diversity)(design)(distance) 4Ds 4 TOD TOD TOD //( 2-4)

2-4 TOD

()

Dale & Simon (2001)

Transit Oriented Sustainable Developments

TOD

TOD

Sara & Julie (2002)

Building Transit Oriented Development in Established Communities

TOD

California Department of Transportation. (2002)

Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California

TOD

TOD

Jeffrey & Adam (2003)

How to Make Transit-Oriented Development Work.

TOD 3Ds TOD

TOD TOD

Hank & Gloria (2004).

The new transit town :best practices in transit-oriented development

TODTOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

2-7

( 2-4)

()

Department of Planning and Economic Development, City of Saint Paul (2006)

An Overview of Transit Oriented Development (TOD).

TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD Kara(2006) Preserving and

Promoting Diverse Transit-Oriented Neighborhoods.

1

2

3

4

5

6

TODTOD

Robert & Douglas (2006)

Manifestations of TOD Goals in Development Around Transit.

TOD

TODTOD

Denver the Mile High City (2006)

Transit-Oriented Development Strategic Plan: Community Planning & Development

TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

2-8

TOD

()

TOD TOD ( 92 ) TOD TOD 120

//

()

TOD TOD TOD TOD

TOD TOD TOD

()

TOD TOD / TOD TOD TOD

TOD

TOD

TOD

2-9

TOD

TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD

TOD

(Transit Oriented Development, TOD)

TOD 1960 1970 1990 TOD(Dena, B. & Gerald, A. ,2002; 20032004) TOD TOD TOD

()(Development-Oriented Transit, DOT)

20 (development-oriented transit) (streetcar) 1930

()(Transit Adjusted Development, AOT)

(Auto-Oriented Transit, AOT) 1954 (the Federal-Aid Highway Legislation of 1954)1970 (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit system, BART)MARTA in Atlanta

()(Transit-Related Development, TRD)

1990 (Transit-Related Development, TRD)

TOD

2-10

() (Transit Adjacent Development, TAD)

(Jeffrey & Adam,2003 ; Arrington2005)

() (Transit-Oriented Development, TOD)

21 TOD TOD

TOD

TOD (2004)TOD TOD //(Dena & Gerald,2002) TOD

TOD TOD

() TOD

Calthorpe(1993)(2001)Dena&Gerald (2002)(2003) (2003) TOD TOD

TOD ()

() TOD

Calthorpe(1993) TOD 1 2

3

Cervero(2004)4 D's( Robert&Douglas,2006)1 density2 diversity3 design4 (distance)TOD

TOD

2-11

1.Density

2.Diversity

3.Design

4.(Distance)

TOD

TOD (vision)(Dena&Gerald,2002).

()TOD

TOD TOD TOD 1.2.3.4.5.6.

()TOD

TOD TOD Dena & Gerald (2002)Sara & Julie(2002)(2003)Department of Planning and Economic Development, City of Saint Paul(2006)(2000)(2001)(2003)(2003)(2004) TOD 1.1 2 3 4 2.1 2 3 4

3.1 2

()TOD

TOD TOD

TOD

2-12

Calthorpe(1993) (2000) (2001)Sara &

Julie(2002)(2002)(2003)(2003)(2003)

(2004)(2005) Robert & Douglas(2006)Department of Planning and

Economic Development, City of Saint Paul(2006)1.1

(Evaluation)2 (Density)3

(Diversity)(mixed land use)4 (Design)

5 (Distance)

500 10 6

(Regulation)7 (Real Estate

Market Analysis)8 /(Finance / Fund)

2.1

2 3 4 5

3.1

2 3 4 5

()TOD

TOD

Calthorpe(1993)(2000)Department of Planning and

Economic Development, City of Saint Paul(2006)Sara & Julie(2002)

(2003)(2003)(2003)(2001)(2004)

TOD 1.1 2 3

2.1 2 3.

1 2 3 4

5

TOD 1 2 (2004) TOD

()TOD

TOD TOD

1.

TOD

TOD

2-13

TOD TOD

2.

TOD TOD

()TOD

TOD TOD

1.

TOD

TOD

2.

TOD

()()

3.TOD

TOD ()

()TOD

Nelson & Niles & Aharon (2001) Puget Sound Regional Council (1999)Niles & Nelson(1999b) TOD 1 2 34 56 7 8

TOD

2-14

TOD9 California Department of Transportation(2002)

(Planning for Transit-Friendly Land Use: A Handbook for New Jersey Communities) TOD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10

TOD TOD ( 2-5)

2-5 TOD ()TODs / / /

Nelson & Niles & Aharon (2001) Puget Sound Regional Council (1999)Niles & Nelson(1999b)

TOD

2-15

()TOD

Calthorpe(1993)TOD ( TODs)( TODs) Hank & Gloria (2004)(Land-Use Mix)(Minimum Housing Density)(Housing Types)(Scale)(Reigional Connectivity)(Transit Modes)(Frequencies)(Examples) TOD (downtown)(Urban Neighborhood)(Suburban Center)(Suburban Neighborhood)(Neighborhood Transit Zone)(Commuter Town Center)Denver the Mile High City (2006)(Transit-Oriented Development Strategic Plan)TOD /( 2-6) TOD

TOD

2-16

2-6 TOD

/

(downtown)

5

/

(Major Urban

Center)

250,000

50,000sf

5

Park-n-Ride

(Urban Center)

250,000

50,000sf

3

Park-n-Ride

(Urban

Neighborhood)

50,000sf

2-7

Park-n-Ride

(Commuter Town

Center)

25,000

sf

2-7

Park-n-Ride

(Main

Street)

2-7

/

(Campus/Special

Events Station)

/

Denver the Mile High City (2006)

TOD

2-17

TOD

TOD () TOD

() TOD

TOD () TOD

()

(New Urbanism N.U.)

(TOD)(TND)

TOD

( 2-1)

()

(The single

building)(Groups of buildings)(The urban block)(The

neighborhood)(Networks of neighborhoods)(Towns)(Cities)

(Regions)

(compact)(high-density)(mixed-use)

TOD

(infill

development)(the revitalization of

urban areas)(compact growth)

()

Katz(1994)(2001)(2001)(2003a2003b2003c)

Robert S. (2004),,Robert, C. (2005)(2005)(2006)

(2007)

TOD

2-18

1.(Region)

(Metropolis)(city)(town),

,Robert, C. (2005)

1

2 (UGB)()

()

3

4 ()

5

6

7

2.(neighborhood)/(district)/(corridor)

(//)

1

400

2

3

4

5

TOD

2-19

6

()

3.//

(//)

,,Robert, C. (2005)

TOD

()

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

//

//

TOD

(UGB)

2-1 TOD

TOD

2-20

(Smart Growth S.G.)

/

TOD

() TOD

TOD

1.

2.

( 2-2)

3.

Smart Growth Network Land Development Regulations Subcommittee (2003)

Emily & Gerrit (2003)

(Illinois)(regional programs

and policies)(process-oriented policies)(spatial policies)

(site-specific policies) TOD

( 2-7)

TOD

2-21

2-7

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3 4 PUD 5

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3

4 5 6 ()

Emily & Gerrit (2003)

()TOD

ICMA

//

TOD

( 2-2 2-3)

1.

2.

TOD

2-22

3.

(

)WalkingBicycling

Metro Transit M.T( B.M.W.)(

)

4.

5.

jobs-housing

1 2

6.

B.M.W.

7.

(

)

8.

TOD

2-23

2-2 TOD

2-3 TOD (Clancy & KKO Associates & Byrne, 2005)

TOD

2-24

(Green Transport)

(2001)(2004)(2005)(2007)

TOD

() TOD

TOD

1.//

(2007)

B.M.W

2.

TOD

() TOD

(2005)

//

TOD

TOD

2-25

1.

2.

1

2

(2005)

()

3.

()

( 2-4)

1.

2.B.M.W.

B.M.W.

()

TOD

2-26

3.

(M)

2-4 TOD

TOD

POD

(W) (B)

TOD

2-27

TOD

TOD TOD

TOD

TOD

( 2-5)

2-5 TOD

TOD

2-28

TOD

TOD TOD (2007)

TOD TOD TOD TOD TOD

()

()

TOD

()

TOD TODs TODs TOD 400()

TOD

TOD

()

TOD

2-29

1.

/

2.

(

)

3.

()

1.

()

2.

TOD ()

(400 )

3.

(

)

4.

()

TOD

2-30

5.

B.M.W

()

1.

2.

TOD

3.

TOD

400-600

400