psychologist carl rogers suggests writers should mention the opposing side of an issue ◦ fully...

11

Upload: natalie-scott

Post on 13-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2
Page 2: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

Psychologist Carl Rogers suggests writers should mention the opposing side of an issue

◦ Fully◦ Fairly◦ Objectively

2

Page 3: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

the opposing side of an issue◦ Fully:

no key points omitted no “Card Stacking”

◦ Fairly: no disservice, slanting, distortion no misrepresentation

◦ Objectively: no personal opinion no bias

3

Page 4: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

to gain credibility to build Ethos to present a complete vision of the issue

4

Page 5: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

basically, the opposing view can appear in several positions in your essay◦ Introduction◦ Body◦ Conclusion

5

Page 6: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

Introduction:◦ as a way of backgrounding the issue◦ or segueing to your point

Conclusion:◦ as a way of wrapping up◦ as a way of setting up your reiteration of your

main points

6

Page 7: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

Body:◦ all main points

Body Par. #1 immediately after the Introduction

Body:◦ a single opposing point

before each point as a way of transitioning to or introducing a point

after each point as a way of “warranting” the point

7

Page 8: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

I. INTRODUCTION◦status of the situation

“State of the Union” regarding the issue “General Context” of issue

◦ remain neutral and objective

8

Page 9: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

II. SIDE ONE◦ presented

fully, fairly, and objectively presented

◦ each point = a fully developed paragraph Name (Sub-Claim) Explain Illustrate (Grounds) Reiterate (Warrant)

9

Page 10: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

III. SIDE TWO◦ presented

fully, fairly, and objectively presented

◦ each point = a fully developed paragraph Name (Sub-Claim) Explain Illustrate (Grounds) Reiterate (Warrant)

10

Page 11: Psychologist Carl Rogers  suggests writers should mention  the opposing side of an issue ◦ Fully ◦ Fairly ◦ Objectively 2

IV. CONCLUSION◦now you get subjective

analyze, evaluate the data draw conclusions based on the previous information Weaknesses

(fallacies) Strengths

(Logos, Pathos, Ethos)

◦ **end with SIDE THREE**

11