great expectations. perspectives of the regional development programme in romania from the point of...
DESCRIPTION
The cohesion regions in RomaniaTRANSCRIPT
.
Great expectations. Perspectives of the Regional development programme in Romania from the point of view of the potential future beneficiaries * by Biagio Perretti**•* This presentation represents the opinions of the author and not necessarily the official position of the Consortium implementing the FPTSF project.•** Phare Project: Programming and implementation of preaccess support for PHARE ESC and transition to Structural Funds. Romania. International consortium. lead partner FORMEZ Italy
1.1.Perspectives of SF Interventions in Perspectives of SF Interventions in Romania. The Regional Operational Romania. The Regional Operational Programme in the framework of the Programme in the framework of the strategic guidelines for 2007-2013 strategic guidelines for 2007-2013
2.2.Local needs, project ideas and perspectives Local needs, project ideas and perspectives from the point of view of potential from the point of view of potential beneficiariesbeneficiaries
3.3.Consistency of beneficiaries expectations Consistency of beneficiaries expectations and the EU strategic priorities for the next and the EU strategic priorities for the next programming periodprogramming period
4.4.Key issues for the future. Key issues for the future. 5.5.ConclusionsConclusions
Overview and IntroductionOverview and Introduction
The cohesion regions in The cohesion regions in RomaniaRomania
Regional development in Regional development in RomaniaRomania
* From: REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN ROMANIA by Maria Vincze Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economic Sciences Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2004
% financial allocation*
12184818112
* preliminary estimations
National emergencies reserve Territorial cooperation
Human Resources
Programmes Competitiveness
Transport - Environment Regional Development
Technical assistance
Operational programmesOperational programmes erdf-cf Romania erdf-cf Romania
Potential Beneficiaries Potential Beneficiaries involved in the surveyinvolved in the survey
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Municipality
County
Associat., Consor., NGOs
Chamber of Commerce
Branch of national body
Educational Institution
Number of Project ideas per Number of Project ideas per areas of interventionareas of intervention
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
transport
educational infrastructures
social services
Health services
environment
utilities
Grants for SMEs
SMEs services
industrial development
tourism
cultural heritage
Urban reabilitation
Financial weight of project Financial weight of project ideas per areas of interventionideas per areas of intervention
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
transport
educational infrastructures
social services
Health services
utilities
environment
Grants for SMEs
SMEs services
industrial development
tourism
cultural heritage
Urban reabilitation
Qualitative indicators of project Qualitative indicators of project readinessreadiness
Main categories of projecs
Involvement of stake-holders
institutional setting
PPP frameworks
technical projects ready
to starttransport *** *** n ***tourism- cultural ** ** ** ***educational infrastructures *** ** n *Health social services *** ** n *utilities environment ** ** * ***industrial infrastructures ** ** * **Urban reabilitation ** * * **Grants/ services for SMEs * * * *max:*** medium** low*
Availability of project ideas per programme priorities*
* Expected, still under negotiation
healthIndustrial
development
tourism
transport
urban restoration
other
Project ideas versus Strategic Guidelines
Projects per areas of intervention
Europe attractive places to invest and work
knowledge and
innovation for growth
More and
better jobs
the territorial
dimension of Cohesion
Policy ROP projects
transport * * Grants/ services f or SMEs * industrial inf rastructures * tourism-cultural * * Health -social services ** * Urban rehabilitation * **
NON ROP projects Utilities - environment* ** educational inf rastructures * ** max:*** medium** low*
Project ideas versus Strategic Guidelines
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1
Europe attractive places toinvest and work
knowledge and innovation forgrowth
More and better jobs
the territorial dimension ofCohesion Policy
1.1.Focus on Entrepreneurship Focus on Entrepreneurship promotionpromotion
2.2.Tourism promotion for the Tourism promotion for the diversification of rural economydiversification of rural economy
3.3.Promotion of public private Promotion of public private partnerships for better public partnerships for better public services services
Opportunities for the implementation of the Lisbon strategy and strategic
guidelines in Romania
1.1.Adverse selection due to co-Adverse selection due to co-financing uncertaintiesfinancing uncertainties
2.2.Traditional approaches in Traditional approaches in innovative areasinnovative areas
3.3.Uncertainties in institution Uncertainties in institution building for programme and building for programme and project implementationproject implementation
4.4.Inertia effects bringing to focus Inertia effects bringing to focus on pre-accession limited fields of on pre-accession limited fields of interventionintervention
Treats for the implementation of the Lisbon strategy and strategic
guidelines in Romania
1.1.Information and capacity building at Information and capacity building at the level of beneficiaries.the level of beneficiaries.
2.2.Finalization of programme priorities Finalization of programme priorities and expected instruments and expected instruments
3.3.Fast clarification of institutional asset Fast clarification of institutional asset for programme managementfor programme management
4.4.Clear allocation of co-financing Clear allocation of co-financing responsibilities coherent to the responsibilities coherent to the prioritiespriorities
……Conclusions aConclusions annd future d future prospectsprospects
