decision-making - new vision universitydecision-making the de borda institute

70
DECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute www.deborda.org www.decision-maker.org

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

DECISION-MAKING

The de Borda Institute

www.deborda.org

www.decision-maker.org

Page 2: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MAJORITY RULE

MAJORITARIANISM = ….........................

Микайл Сергеeвич, Вам нужен …...................

Page 3: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MAJORITY RULE

MAJORITARIANISM = БОЛЬШЕВИЗМ

Микайл Сергеeвич, Вам нужен большевизм

Page 4: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ЗАПАДНЫЕ БОЛЬШЕВИКИ

ELECTED DICTATORS

• Gamsakhurdia

Page 5: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ЗАПАДНЫЕ БОЛЬШЕВИКИ

ELECTED DICTATORS

• Gamsakhurdia

• Erdoğan

• Putin

• Trump

• Bashar al-Assad

Page 6: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MAJORITY RULE…

A CAUSE OF WAR

Always: Israel/Palestine

1940s/50s India/Pakistan

1970s/80s Northern Ireland

1990s The Caucasus, The Balkans

Rwanda

2000s Syria, Yemen…

Kenya

2010s Ukraine

Page 7: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

THE BALKANS

“All the wars in the former Yugoslavia started with

a referendum.”

Oslobodjenje,

Sarajevo’s famous newspaper

7.2.1999

The same quotation now applies to Ukraine.

Page 8: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MAJORITY RULE or POWER-SHARING

50% + 1

The winner gets everything, the loser gets nothing!

2004 Yushchenko v Yanukovich

Ющенко v Янукович

2010 Yanukovich v Timoshenko

Янукович v Тимошенко

Page 9: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

CURRENT FORMS OF GOVERNANCE

Parliament

The People

GovernmentOpposition

Page 10: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

CRAZY COALITIONS

• UK Conservative Party + Democratic

Unionist Party

• Austria Centre-right party + Extreme-right party

• Israel Likud with very extremist Jewish Home

• Turkey Coalition with the Kurds?

• Israel Coalition with Arab List?

Page 11: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

SWITZERLAND

AND THE ‘MAGIC FORMULA’

Federal Council

7 persons, elected by parliament on a magic

formula from the four main parties.

2:2:2:1

Page 12: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MY TALK

1. Majority voting (on only two options) is

inaccurate. It should be replaced by preferential

voting (on many options).

2. So majority rule should be replaced by all-party

power-sharing.

I. A critique of majority voting.

II. The right of self-determination.

III. Preferential points voting.

IV. (Briefly) all-party coalitions.

Page 13: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

I. A CRITIQUE OF MAJORITY VOTING

Majority Voting

• Option A or option B?

• Option A, yes-or-no?

Page 14: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE

Figure

1 -- Standard Normal Distribution

SMALL TALLAVERAGE

Page 15: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE

Figure

1 -- Standard Normal Distribution

LEFT-WING RIGHT-WINGAVERAGE

Page 16: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

GEORGE WASHINGTON

The two-party system of politics

“has perpetrated the most horrid

enormities [and] is itself a frightful

despotism.”

Farewell address, 1796.

Page 17: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A MINIMUM PLURALIST SOCIETY…

3 PERSONS WITH 3 OPINIONS

Three people

Ms i Mr j Ms k

Three options

A B C

Ale Beer Cider

Page 18: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

3 PERSONS AND THEIR 1st PREFERENCES

Ms i Mr j Ms k

A B C

Page 19: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

3 PERSONS AND THEIR 1st, 2nd and 3rd PREFERENCES

Ms i Mr j Ms k

1st A B C

2nd B C A

3rd C A B

Page 20: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ORDER OF VOTING

A

versus = A

B versus = C

C

Page 21: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ORDER OF VOTING

C

versus = C

A versus = B

B

Page 22: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ORDER OF VOTING

B

versus = B

C versus = A

A

Page 23: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ORDER OF VOTING

A

versus = A

B versus = C

C

B

versus = B

C versus = A

A

C

versus = C

A versus = B

B

Page 24: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

PARADOX OF VOTING

MAJORITY RULE IN A PLURALIST SOCIETY?

A > B > C > A ….

Page 25: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

THE SIMPLEST DEBATE

A MOTION: Paint the door red.

ONE AMENDMENT: Delete the word ‘red’

and insert ‘blue’.

A = A red door

B = A blue door

C = The status quo: a green door.

Page 26: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

BOSNIA

1990 elections:

Moslem:Orthodox:Catholic = 40:30:20

40 + 30 > 20

40 + 20 > 30

30 + 20 > 40

40 + 20 = a majority = war

. 40 versus 20 = another war

Page 27: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MANIPULATION: THE ROLE OF THE CHAIR

Ms i Mr j Ms k

D D D

A A A

A = ale

D = draught

Page 28: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

DIVIDE AND RULE

Ms i Mr j Ms k

D B C

A C D

B D A

C A B

A = ale

B = beer

C = cider

D = draught

Page 29: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A > B > C > D > A…

D

versus = C

C

Page 30: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A > B > C > D > A…

D

versus = C

C versus = B

B

Page 31: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A > B > C > D > A…

D

versus = C

C versus = B

B versus = A

A

Page 32: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

‘DEMOCRATIC DICTATORS’

PLACE Date AUTHOR ISSUE FOR TURN

OUT

FRANCE 1800 NAPOLEON BE CONSUL 99% 43%

CHILE 1818 O’HIGGINS BE SUPREMO 100% -

RUSSIA 1903 LENIN BOLSHEVISM 49% -

GERMANY 1936

HITLER

FUHRER 98% 98%

AUSTRIA 1938 ANSCHLUSS 99% 99%

IRAN

1953 MOSSADEGH SOCIALISM 99% -

1963 SHAH REVOLUTION 99% 91%

1979 KHOMEINI ISLAMIC 99% 65%

Page 33: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

THE QUESTION IS THE ANSWER

PLACE Date AUTHOR ISSUE FOR TURN

OUT

NORTHERN

IRELAND

1973 TED HEATH

(BRITISH PM)

THE BORDER 99% 59%

NAGORNO-

KARABAKH

199I - INDEPENDENT 99% 82%

KOSOVA 1991 RUGOVA INDEPENDENT 99% 87%

Republica

Srpska

1991 KARADŽIĆ STAY IN

YUGOSLAVIA

98% 85%

ABKHAZIA 1999 ARDZINBA INDEPENDENT 97% 88%

IRAQ

1995

SADDAM

HUSSEIN

HIMSELF 99.9 99.5

2002 HIMSELF 100% 100%

Page 34: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

II. SELF-DETERMINATION

“All peoples have the right of self-determination.”

USA President Woodrow Wilson

Page 35: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A MAJORITY

OF THE WHOLE

BIG

Page 36: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A MAJORITY OF THE MINORITY

SMALL

Page 37: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A MAJORITY OF THE MINORITY

OF THE MINORITY

TINY

Page 38: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

MATRIOSHKA NATIONALISM

BIG SMALL TINY

UK IRELAND NORTHERN IRELAND

SCOTLAND ORKNEY ISLANDS

SOVIET

UNION

or

RUSSIA

GEORGIA ABHAZIA

SOUTH OSSETIA

ADJARA

AZERBAIJAN NAGORNO-KARABAKH

MOLDOVA TRANS-DNESTR

CRIMEA

UKRAINE DONETSK

KRASNOARMIISK RAION ?

CHECHNYA

TARTARSKAYA?

YUGOSLAVIA

CROATIA KRAJINA

BOSNIA REPUBLIKA-SRPSKA

HERZEG-BOSNA

SERBIA KOSOVA

PREŠEVO VALLEY ?

Page 39: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. KIRKUK

IRAQ

Page 40: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. KIRKUK

IRAQ

Page 41: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. KIRKUK

IRAQ

Page 42: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. KIRKUK

IRAQ

Page 43: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

III. A MORE INCLUSIVE VOTING PROCEDURE

Multi-option voting

Preferential voting

Page 44: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

SWEDEN – 1955

Which side of the road shall we drive on?

• Left

• Right

• Blank

Page 45: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

SWEDEN – 1955

Which side of the road shall we drive on?

• Left 82.9%

• Right 15.5%

• Blank 1.6%

Page 46: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

CLOSED

QUESTIONS

SEMI-OPEN

QUESTIONS

OPEN

QUESTIONS

↑All

Prefs

DECISION-MAKING Preferential

points voting

C AV = alternative vote

PPV = preferential points voting

TRS = two-round system

Condorcet

OSome

U prefs AV

N 1st

prefs

only

Weighted majority

EU

Power-sharing

NI, Bosnia

2-round system

TRS Norway*

T Simple majority

Everywhere

Double Majority

Switzerland

Plurality

Denmark

* a first-

round

plurality

and then a

majority

vote

1 of 2

options

1 of some

options

1 or some of

some options

1or some or all

of all options

1st preference only Preferential

BINARY MULTI-OPTIONAL

VOTERS’ CHOICE → →

Page 47: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

AVERAGE HEIGHT

Option A < 1 m 60

Option B ≥ 1 m 60

Option C ≥ 1 m 70

Option D ≥ 1 m 80

Option E ≥ 1 m 90

Page 48: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

A VOTERS’ PROFILE ON FOUR OPTIONS

A, B, C and D

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Preference A C D B

2nd Preference B B B D

3rd Preference C D C C

4th Preference D A A A

Page 49: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

PLURALITY VOTE

A 5, C 4, D 3, B 2

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Preference A C D B

2nd Preference B B B D

3rd Preference C D C C

4th Preference D A A A

Page 50: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

TWO-ROUND SYSTEM (TRS)

1st round: A 5, C 4, D 3, B 2

2nd round: A 5, C 9

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Preference A C D B

2nd Preference B B B D

3rd Preference C D C C

4th Preference D A A A

Page 51: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

ALTERNATIVE VOTE (AV, IRV, PV or STV)

1st round: A 5, C 4, D 3, B 2

2nd round: A 5, C 4, D 5

3rd round: A 5, D 9

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Preference A C D B

2nd Preference B B B D

3rd Preference C D C C

4th Preference D A A A

Page 52: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

BORDA COUNT (BC)

PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

A 29, B 44, C 36, D 31

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Pref (4 points) A C D B

2nd Pref (3 points) B B B D

3rd Pref (2 points) C D C C

4th Pref (1 point) D A A A

Page 53: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

A 29, B 44, C 36, D 31

14 voters

5 4 3 2

1st Pref (4 points) A 20 C 16 D 12 B 8

2nd Pref (3 points) B 15 B 12 B 9 D 6

3rd Pref (2 points) C 10 D 8 C 6 C 4

4th Pref (1 point) D 5 A 4 A 3 A 2

Page 54: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

THE WINNERS!

A or B or C or D

Plurality Two-

round

AV or

STV

PPV

A 5 5 5 29

B 2 - - 44

C 4 9 - 36

D 3 - 9 31

Page 55: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

….

PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 point.

Page 56: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. PARTIAL VOTING IN PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 point.

She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 points (and her

2nd choice 1 point).

Page 57: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

. PARTIAL VOTING IN PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

He who votes for 1 option gives his favourite 1 point.

She who votes for 2 options gives her favourite 2 points (and her 2nd choice 1 point).

He who votes for 3 options gives his favourite 3 points, (his 2nd

choice 2 points and his 3rd choice 1 point).

Page 58: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

PARTIAL VOTING IN PREFERENTIAL POINTS VOTING

If you vote for:

Number of options

1 2 3 4 5

your 1ST preference

gets:1

point

2

points

3

points

4

points

5

points

your 2ND preference

gets:_ 1

point

2

points

3

points

4

points

your 3RD preference

gets:_ _ 1

point

2

points

3

points

your 4TH preference

gets:_ _ _ 1

point

2

points

your 5TH preference

gets:_ _ _ _ 1

points

Page 59: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

A-40% B-45% C-50% D-55% E-60%

MrJ

LOGICAL PREFERENCES

Mr J - E, D, C, B, A

Page 60: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

A-40% B-45% C-50% D-55% E-60%

MrJ

MsK

LOGICAL PREFERENCES

Mr J - E, D, C, B, A

Ms K - B, A, C, D, E

Page 61: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

A-40% B-45% C-50% D-55% E-60%

MrJ

MsK

MsL

LOGICAL PREFERENCES

Mr J - E, D, C, B, A

Ms K - B, A, C, D, E

Ms L - B, C, D, A, E

Page 62: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

A-40% B-45% C-50% D-55% E-60%

MrJ

MsK

MsL

MrM

ILLOGICAL PREFERENCES

Mr M - D, B, E, A, C

Page 63: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

A-40% B-45% C-50% D-55% E-60%

MrJ

MsK

MsL

LOGICAL PREFERENCES

Mr J - E, D, C, B, A

Ms K - B, A, C, D, E

Ms L - B, C, D, A, E

Page 64: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

COLLECTIVE

SET OF PREFERENCES

Mr J (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

+ Ms K (4, 5, 3, 2, 1)

+ Ms L (2, 5, 4, 3, 1)

= All (7, 12, 10, 9, 7)

Page 65: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

THE COLLECTIVE WILL

3 LOGICAL PREFERENCESMr J = 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5

Ms K = 4 - 5 - 3 - 2 - 1

Ms L = 2 - 5 - 4 - 3 - 1

All = 07-12-10-09-07

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

A - 40% B - 45% C - 50% D - 55% E - 60%

J

K

L

All

Page 66: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

CLOSED

QUESTIONS

SEMI-OPEN

QUESTIONS

OPEN

QUESTIONS

↑All

Prefs

DECISION-MAKING Preferential

points voting

C AV = alternative vote

BC = Borda Count

MBC = Modified Borda Count = PPV

PPV = preferential points voting = MBC

TRS = two-round system

Condorcet

OSome

Approval

voting

U prefs AV

N 1st

prefs

only

Weighted majority

EU, Finland

Power-sharing

NI, Belgium

2-round system

TRS Norway*

T Simple majority

Ireland, UK, all

Twin Majority

Switzerland

Plurality

Denmark

* a first-

round

plurality

and then, if

need be, a

majority

vote

1 of 2

options

1 of some

options

1 or some of

some options

1or some or all

of all options

1st preference only Preferential

BINARY MULTI-OPTIONAL

VOTERS’ CHOICE → →

Page 67: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

CURRENT FORMS OF GOVERNANCE

Parliament

The People

GovernmentOpposition

Page 68: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

16

32

64

128

256

512

2000 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 2010 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 16 17

Austria

Belgium

Finland

Germany

Ireland

Netherlands

Spain

SMALL CIRCLE Minority, one partyDIAMOND Minority coalitionBIG CIRCLE Majority, one partyTRIANGLE Majority coalitionSQUARE Grand coalition

LINE Undecided

Page 69: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

REPRESENTATION

Government

Parliament

The People

Page 70: DECISION-MAKING - New Vision UniversityDECISION-MAKING The de Borda Institute

IV. ALL-PARTY COALITIONS

The people elect the parliament,

the electoral system is proportional and preferential.

The parliament elects:

(i) the government; and

(ii) its referees;

again, the electoral system is proportional and preferential.

For non-urgent decisions:

all parties can make proposals

the referees choose the options for the ballot

and decisions are taken by a preferential points system.