choose a safer car collision safety performance assessment technologies to protect people in crashes...

Choose a safer car

Collision safety performance assessmentTechnologies to protect people in crashes

Japan New Car Assessment Program

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid

2019.3

Car assessment

Collision safety performance assessment

Five stars award

2019.3

Test images are available on our website

NCAP management Department National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid19F Arka-East building 3-2-1 Kinshi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo 130-0013Phone: 03-5608-7587 Fax: 03-5608-8610

● Search by Key-wordWebsite

www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/ JACAP Search




www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/ JACAP

* All rights reserved.Editorial supervisor: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and TourismIssued by: ©National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid

Does the vehicle that you have chosen come with safety devices such as side curtain airbags

(SCA)?

2✔

Have you checked our website or booklet and chosen a vehicle that features both preventive

safety and collision safety technologies?

3✔

Checklist to choose safer cars (Collision Safety Performance)

Getting into a car accident can lead to serious consequences not only to drivers but also

pedestrians or cyclists.

Have you ever thought about you cause a car accident?✔

1

Use assessment results of JNCAP wisely to choose safer vehicles!

The National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid (NASVA) is engaged in the prevention of accidents inan effort to reduce the number of automobile accident victims through the Japan New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) and other initiatives, while also offering support to those who have suffered from automobile accidents. To achieve this goal, NASVA looks from the perspective of all of those who may fall victim to automobile accidents, including pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers, to constantly improve its assessment of automobile safety performance through JNCAP.

More specifically, NASVA chooses which automobile performance features should be assessed based on analysis of accident data to determine which automobile accident patterns occur most frequently. Testing and assessment methods are prepared not only so that vehicles capable of efficiently mitigating damage from accidents are rated highly, but also that such vehicles are rated even more highly if their manufacturer’s engineering and development teams have further improved their safety performance in light of the assessment results.

NASVA also uses this brochure and other means to ensure that consumers are able to choose safer vehicles by explaining to them what tests and assessments of performance features are conducted as stipulated by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, as well as the results of such assessments.

What do you consider when purchasing a vehicle? Some choose vehicles based on their own or their family’s preferences and specific uses, while others look at fuel efficiency out of a concern for cost.

However, isn’t safety performance just as important as those aspects, since those features might save your life in the event of an accident? To help you find a safer vehicle, it is now possible to compare safety performance across different vehicle models.

Please use this checklist and pick up your right one.

2

2. Offset frontal collision test

Driver’s side of a test vehicle (40% overlap) in which dummies are placed in the driver and rear passenger seats is made to collide head-on with an aluminum honeycomb structure at a speed of 64 km/h. The degree of driver and passenger

protection is assessed based on the impact on the dummies’ heads, chests, and other regions and deformation of the vehicle’s body.

This test simulates an accident in which the driver attempts to avoid an oncoming vehicle, but half of the vehicle ends up colliding with it at a speed of 55 km/h.

4. Performance test for electric shock protection

“Electric shock protection requirements” of hybrid automobiles and other vehicles after collision tests are assessed to determine whether passengers or rescue personnel would suffer electric shock by touching high voltage areas after a collision.

5. Performance test for neck injury protection in rear-end collision

Using a test facility capable of simulating a rear-end collision, dummies placed in the driver or front passenger seats are subjected to collision shock (velocity change, etc.). The degree of neck protection performance is assessed based on the impact on the dummies’ necks.

This test simulates the rear-end collision impact when a vehicle crashes into a parked vehicle from behind at a speed of 36 km/h (seats move forward rapidly at a speed of 20 km/h).

3. Side collision test

A dummy vehicle weighing 1300 kg* collides at a speed of 55 km/hour against the side of a static test vehicle with a dummy in the driver’s seat or passenger seat. The degree of driver and passenger protection is assessed based on the impact on the dummy’s head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

This test simulates an accident in which a 1300-kg* vehicle collides with the side of another vehicle.

1. Full frontal collision test

Dummies are placed in both driver and front passenger seats, and the vehicle is made to collide with a concrete barrier at a speed of 55 km/h. The degree of driver and passenger protection is assessed based on the impact on the dummies’ heads, chests, and other regions and deformation of the vehicle’s body.

This test simulates an accident in which two vehicles of the same make are involved in ahead-on collision.

Mark certifying that the vehicle has met the electric shock protection performance test requirements

55km/h

Rigid barrier(Hard concrete obstacle)

55km/h

Moving barrier(Mass of 1,300 kg)

Deformable barrier(Aluminum honeycomb)

64km/h

Deformable barrier(Aluminum honeycomb that is crushed as it absorbs impact)

40% of the vehicle’s width collides with the barrier.

1 Passenger Protection Performance Evaluation

*Until FY 2017, a dummy vehicle weighing 950 kg was used.

Testing/Assessment of Collision Safety Performance for JNCAP

JNCAP performs the following tests, and vehicles are assessed based on their results.From FY 2011, collision safety performance of vehicles, in which pedestrian protection performance was added to

driver protection performance, is assessed in light of the realities of traffic accidents that involve drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. The result of such assessment is given a rating on a scale of 1 to 5 stars.

Female dummy in the rear passenger seat

3

2

4

*FY 2018, the assessment of the usability of seat belts for the rear seats was not implemented.

Pedestrian Protection Performance Evaluation

1. Pedestrian head protection performance test

A dummy simulating a pedestrian’s head region (head form impactor) is fired by a testing machine toward a test vehicle’s bonnet or other region at a speed of 40 km/h (equivalent to a vehicle colliding with a pedestrian at a speed of 50 km/h). The degree of pedestrian head protection performance is assessed according to five grades using head injury criteria based on the impact received at various points on the head form impactor.

This test simulates an accident in which a pedestrian is hit by a car and the head of the pedestrian collides with the hood or windshield of the car.

Until FY 2015 it was tested at a speed of 35 km/h (equivalent to a vehicle colliding with a pedestrian at a speed of 44 km/h).

2. Pedestrian leg protection performance test

A dummy simulating an adult male’s legs (Flex-PLI [Flexible Pedestrian Leg form Impactor]) is fired by a testing machine toward a test vehicle’s bumper at a speed of 40 km/h. The degree of pedestrian leg protection performance is assessed according to five grades based on the impact received at various points on the leg form impactor (knees, shins).

This test simulates an accident in which a vehicle hits a pedestrian and his/her legs collide with the bumper or other region.

Until FY 2015, the degree of pedestrian leg injury was assessed for four grades.

The Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (PSBR) is a device that encourages passengers other than the driver to fasten their seat belts to ensure that everyone in the vehicle does so.

In this test, the operational requirements of the

device(type of alarm, timing, display location, etc.) are

checked.

3 Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (PSBR) Evaluation

Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (PSBR) Evaluation

Expansion

Other assessment (*implemented until FY 2017)

1. Rear passenger seat belt usability evaluation test

In a collision, seat belts are the most effective device for protecting passengers. In this test, rear passenger seat belts (window-side seats in the standard position and most forward position) are evaluated based on four parameters, including accessibility and comfort, so anyone can use them with ease.

4

Improvements and transition of items to be evaluated

Although the test items conducted in 1995 were full-wrap frontal crash tests, side crash tests and offset frontal crash tests were added to improve the performance for occupant protection, and the assessment of collision safety performance was started in 2000.

In addition, the head protection performance test was started in 2003 from the viewpoint of pedestrian protection, and the leg protection performance test was added in 2011.

Therefore, the assessment of collision safety performance, including occupant protection performance with added pedestrian protection performance, was started in FY 2011. Other than these, various tests are conducted to enhance the car assessment.

Test item 1 for car assessment

○ Assessment of collision safety performance

Ⅰ. Assessment test for occupant protection performance

Performance test for neck injury protection in rear-end collision

Full-wrap frontal collision test

Offset frontal collision test

Side collision test

Ⅱ. Pedestrian protection performance Evaluation

Pedestrian head protectionperformance test

Pedestrian leg protectionperformance test

Ⅲ. Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (PSBR) Evaluation

’00 ’11’09’03’99’95 ’17 ’18

Assessment ofcollision safety performance

(FY 2000 to 2010)Assessed in six stages

Assessment ofcollision safety performance

(FY 2011 to 2018)Assessment from 1☆ to 5☆

History of car assessment

5

Outline of collision safety performance evaluation

1 Passenger Protection Performance Evaluation Tests

* Driver’s seat, Front passenger’s seat, Rear passenger’s seatD P R

0 to 12 points points0.0833 0 to 2× ＝　 and D P

0 to 4 points 8.00 0 to 32points

× ＝

0 to 4 points 1.25 0 to 5points

× ＝

　 and

0 to 12 points0.875 0 to 21

points× ＝D P

0 to 12 points points0.625 0 to 15× ＝　 and D P

2 Pedestrian Protection Performance Evaluation Tests 3 Passenger Seat Belt

Reminder (PSBR) Evaluation

Weight Overall scoreScores fromthe results

1 Full frontal collision test

2 Offset frontal collision test

4 Performance test for neck injury protection in rear-end collision

3 Side collision test

0 to 12 points points0.875 0 to 21× ＝R　 and D

Passenger protectionperformance evaluation

Total maximum score of 59 points

Pedestrian protectionperformance evaluation


Passenger seat beltreminder evaluationTotal maximum score of 4 points

1 Pedestrian head protection performance tests

2 Pedestrian leg protection performance test



Weight

Overallscore

Scores fromthe results

0 to 100

0.04

0 to 4points

points

×

＝

[Requirements for ]If the level is 3 or lower in each test (excluding assess-

ment of seat belt wearing alarm device), the highest assessment of 5☆ cannot be obtained.

Collision safety performance : Total maximum score of 100 points

(Scale)

82.0 points or more

72.5 or more and under 82.0 points



Under 53.5 points

From FY 2018, collision safety performance is rated on a scale of one to five (☆ to ☆☆☆☆☆ ) and graded on a 100-point scale in terms of passenger protection performance (full score: 59 points), pedestrian protection performance (full score: 37 points), and seat belt reminder device performance (full score: 4 points).

The minimum basic score that should naturally be acquired by currently commercially sold automobiles was assumed to be 53.5 points, and the score under 53.5 points was assumed to be ☆ , 53.5 points or more, and under 63.0 points ☆☆ , 63.0 points or more, and under 72.5 points ☆☆☆ , 72.5 points or more, and under 82.0 points ☆☆☆☆ and 82.0 points or more ☆☆☆☆☆ .

In addition, as the additional condition for acquiring the best evaluation ☆☆☆☆☆ , if an evaluation lower than the best by two steps or more was given in each of the passenger protection performance tests and the pedestrian protection performance tests, ☆☆☆☆☆cannot be acquired.

Outline of evaluation in FY 2018 (Maximum of 100 points)

NEW NEW Evaluation method was updated in FY 2018.

6

Outline of collision safety performance evaluation

[Requirements for ]To earn , the results of “1. Passenger protec-

tion performance test” and “2-1. Pedestrian head protec-tion performance test” must be rated 4 or higher, and those of “2-2. Pedestrian leg protection test” must be rated 3 or higher.

For the FY 2011 neck injury protection in a rear-end colli-sion performance test, a rating of Light Green or Green is required.

Collision safety performance : Total maximum score of 208 points

(Scale)

170.0 points or more




Under 110.0 points

1

Passenger protectionperformance evaluation


Pedestrian protectionperformance evaluation


2 31 Pedestrian head protection performance tests

2 Pedestrian leg protection performance test

*1 To be changed after the test speed is altered.* Driver’s seat, Front passenger’s seat, Rear passenger’s seat

*1

1 Full frontal collision test

2 Offset frontal collision test

4 Performance test for neck injury protection in rear-end collision

3 Side collision test

* If side curtain airbags are not available, 3.5 points are deducted from the test results for each seat.

WeightWeight

Overall score

Overallscore




Weight Overallscore


0 to 4 points

points0 to 100

18.750.08

0 to 75

0 to 8

　 and

0 to 12 points1.250 0 to 30

points

0 to 12 points points

0 to 12 points points

0 to 12 points points points

points

points

× ＝

1.250 0 to 30× ＝

1.042 0 to 25× ＝

0.625 0 to 15× ＝

×

×

＝＝

0 to 4 points 6.25 0 to 25× 0.95× ＝

Speedconversion factor

　 and

　 and

D

D

P R

R　 and

Passenger Protection Performance Evaluation Tests

Pedestrian Protection Performance Evaluation Tests

Passenger Seat Belt Reminder (PSBR) Evaluation

Passenger seat beltreminder evaluationTotal maximum score of 8 points

D

D

D P

P

P

(1) Collision safety performance evaluation (evaluation method from FY 2011 to 2017)*1

The overall safety performance of vehicles is evaluated and the test results are published with a 1- to 5-star rating.Passenger protection performance and pedestrian protection performance evaluation results are multiplied by a weight

coefficient for each type of accident and the points are combined. Overall ratings are determined by the total of those points and the points for PSBR evaluation (out of possible eight).

As shown in the chart below, overall ratings are according to five grades. To earn the highest grade (five stars), all of the test results for passenger protection performance and pedestrian head protection performance must be rated 4 or higher, and the pedestrian leg protection performance must be rated 3 or higher.

With the changes of the test and evaluation methods for the pedestrian protection performance that were made in 2016, the performance evaluations made in 2016 and 2017 were rated on a scale of 1- to 5-star after multiplying the evaluations by a correction factor to equalize them to the evaluations made in 2011 to 2015.

*1 Until FY 2015 it was shown described as “New overall evaluation of safety performance”.

2. Collision safety performance evaluation [Evaluation method until FY2010] *2

For the driver’s seat, the results of the full frontal collision test, offset frontal collision test, and side collision test are added together and evaluated to 6 different levels. For the Frontal passenger’s seat, the results of the full frontal collision test and the side collision test (results for the driver’s or the front passenger’s seat are used) are added together and evaluated to 6 different levels.

For side collision tests, the side curtain airbag conditions and the range of its deployment are evaluated. If specified test requirements are met, a “+” sign is shown to the top right of the numbers for overall evaluation.

*2 Until FY 2015, it was described as “Overall evaluation of safety performance”.

Outline of evaluation up to FY 2017

7

■ List of vehicle models tested (shown in kana order; those in red underwent the test in FY 2018.)

Listed below are vehicle models made available as of March 31, 2019.

SUZUKIALTO…………………………………36ALTO Lapin…………………………36IGNIS… ……………………………34EVERY………………………………36X BEE… ……………………………16Jimny… ……………………………16SWIFT… ……………………………34SPACIA………………………………36SPACIA Custom……………………36SOLIO… ……………………………36SOLIO BANDIT… …………………36HUSTLER……………………………34LANDY………………………………28WAGON R… ………………………34WAGON R STINGRAY… …………34

SUBARUIMPREZA……………………………18SAMBAR VAN………………………38CHIFFON……………………………38CHIFFON CUSTOM… ……………38JUSTY………………………………22JUSTY (with SCA)… ………………20STELLA………………………………38STELLA CUSTOM…………………38Dias Wagon…………………………38FORESTER…………………………14PLEO PLUS…………………………38LEVORG… …………………………18LEGACY… …………………………18BRZ… ………………………………24WRX…………………………………18XV……………………………………18

DAIHATSUATRAI WAGON… …………………38ALTIS…………………………………14WAKE… ……………………………38Cast…………………………………36Tanto…………………………………38Tanto CUSTOM……………………38THOR… ……………………………22THOR (with SCA)… ………………20

HIJET CARGO………………………38Boon…………………………………24Boon (with SCA)……………………20Mira e:s………………………………38Mira TOCOT… ……………………16MOVE… ……………………………38MOVE CUSTOM……………………38MOVE canbus………………………38MEBIUS… …………………………22

TOYOTAAQUA… ……………………………24ALLION………………………………26ALPHARD… ………………………22Vitz… ………………………………24VELLFIRE……………………………22VOXY… ……………………………22VOXY (with SCA)……………………20Esquire………………………………22Esquire (with SCA)…………………20ESTIMA… …………………………26COROLLA AXIO……………………22COROLLA SPORT…………………14COROLLA FIELDER… ……………22CAMRY………………………………14CROWN… …………………………14Succeed… …………………………40SIENTA………………………………24SIENTA (with SCA)…………………22SPADE………………………………24TANK… ……………………………22TANK (with SCA)……………………20NOAH… ……………………………22NOAH (with SCA)… ………………20PASSO………………………………24PASSO (with SCA)…………………20HARRIER……………………………22PIXIS EPOCH………………………38PIXIS JOY… ………………………36Pixis Van… …………………………38PIXIS MEGA…………………………38PRIUS… ……………………………20PRIUS PHV…………………………20PRIUS α……………………………22

*SCA is the acronym for Side Curtain Airbag.8

PREMIO… …………………………26PROBOX VAN………………………40Porte…………………………………24MARK X… …………………………26LAND CRUISER PRADO… ………24ROOMY… …………………………22ROOMY (with SCA)… ……………20C-HR…………………………………20JPN TAXI……………………………2086……………………………………24

NISSANX-TRAIL… …………………………28ELGRAND… ………………………28CUBE… ……………………………30JUKE…………………………………30SYLPHY… …………………………28SERENA… …………………………28TEANA………………………………28DAYZ ROOX… ……………………30DAYZ ROOX Highway STAR… …30NOTE… ……………………………28MARCH… …………………………30LEAF…………………………………28NV100 CLIPPER……………………36NV100 CLIPPER RIO………………36NV150 AD… ………………………40NV200 VANETTE… ………………40

HondaACCORD HYBRID…………………32VEZEL… ……………………………30ODYSSEY… ………………………14GRACE………………………………30CIVIC…………………………………32JADE…………………………………32SHUTTLE……………………………32STEPWGN… ………………………32FIT……………………………………32FREED………………………………34FREED+… …………………………34CR-V…………………………………14N-BOX………………………………30N-BOX Custom… …………………30N-ONE………………………………34N-VAN… ……………………………16N-WGN………………………………32

N-WGN Custom……………………32

MAZDAATENZA… …………………………20CAROL………………………………36SCRUM… …………………………36DEMIO………………………………18FAMILIA VAN………………………40FLAIR… ……………………………34FLAIR CROSSOVER………………34FLAIR WAGON… …………………36FLAIR WAGON Custom Style……36BONGO VAN… ……………………40CX-3…………………………………18CX-5…………………………………18CX-8…………………………………18

MITSUBISHIOUTLANDER… ……………………26OUTLANDER PHEV… ……………26ECLIPSE CROSS… ………………14TOWN BOX…………………………36DELICA D:5…………………………26DELICA D:2…………………………36DELICA D:2 CUSTOM… …………36MINICAB VAN………………………36MIRAGE… …………………………26eK space……………………………30eK space custom… ………………30RVR… ………………………………26

vLEXUSCT200h………………………………34

AudiA1……………………………………38

ABARTH595… ………………………………40595C…………………………………40

FIAT500… ………………………………40500C…………………………………40

VOLKSWAGENGolf… ………………………………36

9

v

92.0 points

Manufacturer Model

Pedestrian ProtectionPerformance Evaluation

Passenger SeatBelt Reminder

(PSBR)Evaluation

Passenger ProtectionPerformance Evaluation

5 5 55 5 5 5Driver’s seat Driver’s seatFront passenger's seat Driver’s seat Rear passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat

Level Level Level LevelLevelLevel Level

55.0259 points

Level Level5 5

33.0737 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5Car assessment

Preventive safetyperformance

Electric vehicles, etc.

Car assessment


Five stars award

1

2 3 45 6

7 8

912

131011

Reference

5Bad Good

The number of stars (out of a possible five stars) is determined based on points for pedestrian protection performance evaluation, passenger protec-tion performance evaluation, and PSBR evaluation.Higher numbers of stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.

Collision safety performance evaluation results2

Indicates the cars that received the best rating（★★★★★）in the collision safety performance evaluation.

JNCAP Five Star Award3

Indicates the preventive safety performance evaluation results with “ASV+”, “ASV++” and “ASV+++”.

Preventive safety performance evaluation results4

Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian head protection performance.

Pedestrian head protection performance test results5

The test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian leg protection performance.

Pedestrian leg protection performance test results6

Passengers Cars / Electric vehicles, etc.

Mini-sized Cars Commercial Vehicles

Type of vehicles tested

Points are given out of a possible 37 based on the results of pedestrian head protection performance tests and pedestrian leg protection perfor-mance tests.

Points for pedestrian protection performance evaluation7

Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better passenger protection performance.

Frontal/side collision test results８


Results of neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision９

Points are given out of a possible 59 based on the results of full front alcolli-sion tests, offset frontal collision tests, side collision tests, and neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision.

Points for passenger protection performance evaluation10

Indicates that the evaluation criteria have been met.

Electric shock protection after collision for electric vehicle performance test results11

Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better PSBR performance.Availability of PSBR in the front passenger seat and rear seats is shown.

PSBR test results12

Points are given out of a possible 4 based on the PSBR evaluation test.

Points for PSBR evaluation13

Interpretation of evaluation results for FY 2018

10

v

92.0 points

Manufacturer Model


Passenger SeatBelt Reminder

(PSBR)Evaluation

Passenger ProtectionPerformance Evaluation



55.0259 points

Level Level5 5

33.0737 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5Car assessment



Car assessment


Five stars award

1

2 3 45 6

7 8

912

131011

Reference

5Bad Good

The number of stars (out of a possible five stars) is determined based on points for pedestrian protection performance evaluation, passenger protec-tion performance evaluation, and PSBR evaluation.Higher numbers of stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.


Indicates the cars that received the best rating（★★★★★）in the collision safety performance evaluation.


Indicates the preventive safety performance evaluation results with “ASV+”, “ASV++” and “ASV+++”.


Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian head protection performance.


The test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian leg protection performance.


Passengers Cars / Electric vehicles, etc.

Mini-sized Cars Commercial Vehicles

Type of vehicles tested

Points are given out of a possible 37 based on the results of pedestrian head protection performance tests and pedestrian leg protection perfor-mance tests.



Frontal/side collision test results８


Results of neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision９

Points are given out of a possible 59 based on the results of full front alcolli-sion tests, offset frontal collision tests, side collision tests, and neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision.





PSBR test results12

Points are given out of a possible 4 based on the PSBR evaluation test.


11

Level

Front Passenger

Rear Passenger

4.008 points

6+Driver’s seat 5+Front passenger's seat

5 5 5

5 4 5 24

Driver’s seat Driver’s seatFront passenger's seat

Driver’s seat Rear passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat

Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

88.29100 points

Level

Level

5

4

81.58100 points

173.8 points

Manufacturer ModelElectric vehicles, etc.


Passenger Seat BeltReminder (PSBR)

EvaluationModel Rear Passenger Seat Belt

Usability EvaluationPassenger Protection Performance Evaluation

Reference Example

5Bad Good

○

Test /evaluation items not applicable at the time of testing are highlighted in gray.

Driver’s seat

LevelLevel

Level

Front passenger's seat

Rear passenger's seat

Insertability Identifiability

Accessibility

Comfortability

61

9

11 14

1213

7

10

8 15SAFE

+ -


Accessibility

Comfortability

Front passenger seat side


Accessibility

Comfortability

Driver's seat side

Rear center seat3 point seat belt

3

2

16

17

4

5

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Indicates that SCA was evaluated in a side collision test.

SCA evaluation2



Indicates the preventive safety performance evaluation results with “ASV”, “ASV+” and “ASV++”.


Indicates the cars that received the best rating（★★★★★） in the collision safety performance evaluation.


The number of stars (out of a possible five stars) is determined based on points for pedestrian protection performance evaluation, passenger protection performance evaluation, and PSBR evaluation.Higher numbers of stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.Shown here are models that were tested in FY 2011 and thereafter.


Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian head pro-tection performance.


The test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian leg protection performance.Until FY 2015 test results were rated according to four levels.


Points are given out of a possible 100 based on the results of pedestrian head protection per-formance tests and pedestrian leg protection performance tests.



Frontal/side collision test results10

Type of vehicles tested1Mini-sized Cars Commercial Vehicles Passengers Cars / Electric vehicles, etc. Points are given out of a possible 100 based on the results of full front alcollision tests, offset

frontal collision tests, side collision tests, and neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision.


Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better passenger protection performance.Until FY 2011, results were rated according to the four levels of Orange, Yellow, Light Green, and Green, with Green being the best in terms of neck injury protection performance in a rear-end collision.

Results of neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision12

The number of stars (out of possible six stars) is determined based on points for full frontal col-lision tests, offset frontal collision tests, and side collision tests.More stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers and passengers.This evaluation is not applicable to models subjected to new safety performance overall evalua-tion in FY 2011 and thereafter.A “+” to the top right of the numbers indicates that side curtain airbags that meeting the test requirements are equipped.

Collision safety performance assessment [Evaluation method until FY 2010]13

Points are given out of a possible eight based on the PSBR evaluation test.



PSBR test results15

Accessibility of seat belts in second-row seats, distinguish ability of buckles,ease of insertion of the tongue into the buckle, and comfort when fastened are rated according to three levels.Higher points indicate greater ease of use.The red line shows evaluation results when the seat is in the standard position while the blue line shows evaluation results when the seat is moved forward.

Rear passenger seat belt usability evaluation results16

Indicates that a 3-point seat belt is available for the center seat in the second row.

Availability of 3-point seat belts for rear seats17

If there is no rear center seat does not have this display.

: Standard

: Unavailable

Interpretation of evaluation results through FY 2017

12

Level

Front Passenger

Rear Passenger

4.008 points

6+Driver’s seat 5+Front passenger's seat

5 5 5

5 4 5 24



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

88.29100 points

Level

Level

5

4

81.58100 points

173.8 points

Manufacturer ModelElectric vehicles, etc.





Reference Example

5Bad Good

○

Test /evaluation items not applicable at the time of testing are highlighted in gray.

Driver’s seat

LevelLevel

Level

Front passenger's seat

Rear passenger's seat


Accessibility

Comfortability

61

9

11 14

1213

7

10

8 15SAFE

+ -


Accessibility

Comfortability

Front passenger seat side


Accessibility

Comfortability

Driver's seat side


3

2

16

17

4

5

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Indicates that SCA was evaluated in a side collision test.

SCA evaluation2



Indicates the preventive safety performance evaluation results with “ASV”, “ASV+” and “ASV++”.


Indicates the cars that received the best rating（★★★★★） in the collision safety performance evaluation.


The number of stars (out of a possible five stars) is determined based on points for pedestrian protection performance evaluation, passenger protection performance evaluation, and PSBR evaluation.Higher numbers of stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.Shown here are models that were tested in FY 2011 and thereafter.


Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian head pro-tection performance.


The test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better pedestrian leg protection performance.Until FY 2015 test results were rated according to four levels.


Points are given out of a possible 100 based on the results of pedestrian head protection per-formance tests and pedestrian leg protection performance tests.



Frontal/side collision test results10

Type of vehicles tested1Mini-sized Cars Commercial Vehicles Passengers Cars / Electric vehicles, etc. Points are given out of a possible 100 based on the results of full front alcollision tests, offset

frontal collision tests, side collision tests, and neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision.


Test results are rated according to five levels. Higher levels indicate better passenger protection performance.Until FY 2011, results were rated according to the four levels of Orange, Yellow, Light Green, and Green, with Green being the best in terms of neck injury protection performance in a rear-end collision.

Results of neck injury protection performance tests in a rear-end collision12

The number of stars (out of possible six stars) is determined based on points for full frontal col-lision tests, offset frontal collision tests, and side collision tests.More stars indicate fewer injuries to drivers and passengers.This evaluation is not applicable to models subjected to new safety performance overall evalua-tion in FY 2011 and thereafter.A “+” to the top right of the numbers indicates that side curtain airbags that meeting the test requirements are equipped.

Collision safety performance assessment [Evaluation method until FY 2010]13

Points are given out of a possible eight based on the PSBR evaluation test.



PSBR test results15

Accessibility of seat belts in second-row seats, distinguish ability of buckles,ease of insertion of the tongue into the buckle, and comfort when fastened are rated according to three levels.Higher points indicate greater ease of use.The red line shows evaluation results when the seat is in the standard position while the blue line shows evaluation results when the seat is moved forward.

Rear passenger seat belt usability evaluation results16

Indicates that a 3-point seat belt is available for the center seat in the second row.

Availability of 3-point seat belts for rear seats17

If there is no rear center seat does not have this display.

: Standard

: Unavailable

13

Pedestrian ProtectionPerformance Evaluation Passenger Protection Performance Evaluation


Evaluation

SUBARU FORESTERElectric vehicles, etc.



Level Level5 5

5

96. 5 points

34.0837 points

58.4659 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA CROWNElectric vehicles, etc.

5 5 55 5 5 55 5

3

96. 5 points Level Level

36.5137 points

Driver’s seat Driver’s seatFront passenger's seat Driver’s seat Rear passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat


57.1159 points

2.924 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA COROLLA SPORTElectric vehicles, etc.

5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3


27.4837 points



57.8559 points

2.504 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA CAMRY DAIHATSU ALTIS

5 5 55 5 4 44 5

2



26.3237 points



57.2159 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Honda ODYSSEYElectric vehicles, etc.

83. 9 points 5 5 55 4 5 54 5

2Level Level

26.6137 points



55.3059 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Honda CR-V

5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3

Passengers Cars


26.0237 points



57.4359 points

2.504 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSSPassengers Cars

89. 7 points 5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3Level Level

29.9637 points



56.9659 points

2.834 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


14

Assessment results in FY 2018 (Assessment in maximum of 100 points)



Evaluation

SUBARU FORESTERElectric vehicles, etc.



Level Level5 5

5

96. 5 points

34.0837 points

58.4659 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA CROWNElectric vehicles, etc.

5 5 55 5 5 55 5

3


36.5137 points



57.1159 points

2.924 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA COROLLA SPORTElectric vehicles, etc.

5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3


27.4837 points



57.8559 points

2.504 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


TOYOTA CAMRY DAIHATSU ALTIS

5 5 55 5 4 44 5

2



26.3237 points



57.2159 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Honda ODYSSEYElectric vehicles, etc.

83. 9 points 5 5 55 4 5 54 5

2Level Level

26.6137 points



55.3059 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Honda CR-V

5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3

Passengers Cars


26.0237 points



57.4359 points

2.504 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSSPassengers Cars

89. 7 points 5 5 55 5 5 54 5

3Level Level

29.9637 points



56.9659 points

2.834 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


15



Evaluation

DAIHATSU Mira TOCOTMini-sized Cars

81. 5 points 3 5 53 5 4 44 5

4Level Level

28.2437 points



50.3459 points

3.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


SUZUKI Jimny

4 54 4 5 53 4

55

Mini-sized Cars


23.7037 points



53.7159 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Honda N-VANCommercial Vehicles

78. 5 points 4 4 55 3 5 34 5

2Level Level

26.1637 points

Driver’s seat Front passenger's seatFront passenger's seat Driver’s seat Rear passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat


50.3859 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


SUZUKI X BEEPassengers Cars

85. 2 points 4 5 55 5 5 54 5

2Level Level

29.2537 points



54.0259 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


16

Assessment results in FY 2018 (Assessment in maximum of 100 points)



Evaluation

DAIHATSU Mira TOCOTMini-sized Cars

81. 5 points 3 5 53 5 4 44 5

4Level Level

28.2437 points



50.3459 points

3.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


SUZUKI Jimny

4 54 4 5 53 4

55

Mini-sized Cars


23.7037 points



53.7159 points

4.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Honda N-VANCommercial Vehicles

78. 5 points 4 4 55 3 5 34 5

2Level Level

26.1637 points

Driver’s seat Front passenger's seatFront passenger's seat Driver’s seat Rear passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat


50.3859 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


SUZUKI X BEEPassengers Cars

85. 2 points 4 5 55 5 5 54 5

2Level Level

29.2537 points



54.0259 points

2.004 points

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


17





5 5 5

5 5 5 5

5

5 FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

8.008 points

Level 5

Passengers CarsSUBARU IMPREZA / XV

199.7 points *

Level

Level

96.07100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

95.02100 points

Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side

Accessibility Accessibility

Comfortability

Insertability Identifiability IdentifiabilityInsertability

Comfortability

Rear center seat3 point seat beltCar assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

SUBARU LEGACYPassengers Cars

55 5 5

5 55 44

4188.8 points

Level

Level

89.59100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.29100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



New safety performance overall evaluation

Five stars award

SUBARU LEVORG / WRXPassengers Cars

55 4 5

5 55 44

4183.8 points

Level

Level

86.91100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

89.76100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

7.178 points

Level



Comfortability

Insertability Identi�ability Identi�abilityInsertability

Comfortability


Passengers Cars

2

5 5 5

5 5 5 5

5

5193.9 points

MAZDA CX-8 Driver’s seat Driver’s seatFront passenger's seat


Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

96.67100 points

*

Level

Level

90.23100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

Passengers CarsMAZDA CX-3

54 5 5

5 55 44

2188.2 points

Level

Level

91.62100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.64100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 5 5

5 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

95.45100 points

4

5187.3 points

Passengers CarsMAZDA CX-5 Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


*

Level

Level

81.12100 points

Passengers CarsMAZDA DEMIO

55 5 5

5 55 44

2185.7 points

Level

Level

88.50100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.26100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars awardAdvanced safety car

* As the evaluation method for the pedestrian protection performance was changed, it was multiplied by the correction coefficient so that it would be equal to the collision safety performance evaluations for FY 2011 to 2015.18

Results of assessment before FY 2017





5 5 5

5 5 5 5

5

5 FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

8.008 points

Level 5

Passengers CarsSUBARU IMPREZA / XV

199.7 points *

Level

Level

96.07100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

95.02100 points



Comfortability


Comfortability



Car assessment


Five stars award

SUBARU LEGACYPassengers Cars

55 5 5

5 55 44

4188.8 points

Level

Level

89.59100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.29100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

SUBARU LEVORG / WRXPassengers Cars

55 4 5

5 55 44

4183.8 points

Level

Level

86.91100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

89.76100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

7.178 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


Passengers Cars

2

5 5 5

5 5 5 5

5

5193.9 points

MAZDA CX-8 Driver’s seat Driver’s seatFront passenger's seat


Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

96.67100 points

*

Level

Level

90.23100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

Passengers CarsMAZDA CX-3

54 5 5

5 55 44

2188.2 points

Level

Level

91.62100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.64100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 5 5

5 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

95.45100 points

4

5187.3 points

Passengers CarsMAZDA CX-5 Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


*

Level

Level

81.12100 points

Passengers CarsMAZDA DEMIO

55 5 5

5 55 44

2185.7 points

Level

Level

88.50100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.26100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




* As the evaluation method for the pedestrian protection performance was changed, it was multiplied by the correction coefficient so that it would be equal to the collision safety performance evaluations for FY 2011 to 2015. 19





55 5 5

5 55 44

2

Passengers CarsMAZDA ATENZA

183.2 points

Level

Level

86.20100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.05100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

3

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.678 points

Level

4 4 5

5 54 5

レベル



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

91.36100 points

4

5

Level

Level

82.71100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA C-HR Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


185.8 points*

SAFE

+ -Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 5 5

5 55 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.08100 points

4

5

Level

Level

80.58100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA PRIUS / PRIUS PHV

183.6 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability

Rear center seat3 point seat beltSAFE

+ -

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

4

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

4 5 5

4 5 4 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.53100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.59100 points

TOYOTA JPN TAXIElectric vehicles, etc. Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


182.9 points*

SAFE

+ -Car assessment


Five stars award

5 4

5 4 5 5

55

4

2

Passengers CarsTOYOTA VOXY / NOAH / Esquire (with SCA)

182.3 points

Level

Level

87.42100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.91100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


ComfortabilityAdvanced safety car


Five stars award

Passengers Cars

4

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

3 4 5

4 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

87.90100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.70100 points

TOYOTA ROOMY / TANK (with SCA)DAIHATSU THOR (with SCA) SUBARU JUSTY (with SCA)

180.3 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability



Passengers CarsFront passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


4

3

4 4

5 5

5

5 54

TOYOTA PASSO (with SCA) DAIHATSU Boon (with SCA)

179.2 points *

Level

Level

71.78100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

89.56100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award







55 5 5

5 55 44

2

Passengers CarsMAZDA ATENZA

183.2 points

Level

Level

86.20100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.05100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

3

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.678 points

Level

4 4 5

5 54 5

レベル



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

91.36100 points

4

5

Level

Level

82.71100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA C-HR Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


185.8 points*

SAFE

+ -Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 5 5

5 55 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.08100 points

4

5

Level

Level

80.58100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA PRIUS / PRIUS PHV

183.6 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability


+ -

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

4

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

4 5 5

4 5 4 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.53100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.59100 points

TOYOTA JPN TAXIElectric vehicles, etc. Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


182.9 points*

SAFE

+ -Car assessment


Five stars award

5 4

5 4 5 5

55

4

2

Passengers CarsTOYOTA VOXY / NOAH / Esquire (with SCA)

182.3 points

Level

Level

87.42100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.91100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability




Five stars award

Passengers Cars

4

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

3 4 5

4 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

87.90100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.70100 points

TOYOTA ROOMY / TANK (with SCA)DAIHATSU THOR (with SCA) SUBARU JUSTY (with SCA)

180.3 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability



Passengers CarsFront passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


4

3

4 4

5 5

5

5 54

TOYOTA PASSO (with SCA) DAIHATSU Boon (with SCA)

179.2 points *

Level

Level

71.78100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

89.56100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award






FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 4 5

5 4 4 42



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.08100 points

4

4

Level

Level

84.79100 points

178.8 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA HARRIER Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

2

Passengers CarsTOYOTA VELLFIRE / ALPHARD

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4

5

4 5 5

5 54 5*178.4 points

Level

Level

73.99100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.82100 points



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


Car assessment


Five stars award

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 4 5

5 5 5 52



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.20100 points

4

4

Level

Level

84.27100 points

178.4 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA COROLLA FIELDER / COROLLA AXIO Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car


Five stars award

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA SIENTA (with SCA)

4

4

4 5 5

5 54 52



Comfortability


Comfortability


175.8 points

Level

Level

79.91100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

91.93100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



5 4

5 4 5 5

55

4

2

Passengers CarsTOYOTA VOXY / NOAH / Esquire

175.0 points

Level

Level

87.42100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

83.62100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 5 5

5 3



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

87.74100 points

4

4

Level

Level

81.39100 points

173.1 points

TOYOTA PRIUS α　DAIHATSU MebiusElectric vehicles, etc.

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

Passengers Cars

4

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

3 4 5

4 3 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

77.23100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.70100 points

TOYOTA ROOMY / TANKDAIHATSU THOR SUBARU JUSTY

169.6 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability









4 4 4

5 4 2 22

4

4

TOYOTA 86 SUBARU BRZPassengers Cars

168.8 points

Level

Level

82.49100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

82.32100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



Comfortability


Comfortability


4

3

4 4

4 3

5

5 54

Passengers CarsTOYOTA PASSO DAIHATSU Boon

168.5 points*

Level

Level

71.78100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

78.78100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

Car assessment


FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 4 5

5 3 5 42



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

81.62100 points

4

4

Level

Level

81.65100 points

167.2 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA SPADE / Porte Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


4

4

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA SIENTA

Level

Level

79.91100 points 4 5 5

5 54 42



Comfortability


Comfortability


166.8 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

82.94100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ - Advanced safety car

4 5 5

5 32

4

4166.5 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA Vitz

Level

Level

82.05100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

80.50100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

3 4 5

4 3 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

79.09100 points

4

4

Level

Level

82.25100 points

165.3 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA AQUA

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

5 5 5

5 35

Passengers CarsTOYOTA LAND CRUISER PRADO

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was

evaluated before FY 2010.



Comfortability


Comfortability

Rear center seat3 point seat belt6+Driver’s seat 6+Front passenger's seat

*







4 4 4

5 4 2 22

4

4

TOYOTA 86 SUBARU BRZPassengers Cars

168.8 points

Level

Level

82.49100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

82.32100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



Comfortability


Comfortability


4

3

4 4

4 3

5

5 54

Passengers CarsTOYOTA PASSO DAIHATSU Boon

168.5 points*

Level

Level

71.78100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

78.78100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level

Car assessment


FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 4 5

5 3 5 42



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

81.62100 points

4

4

Level

Level

81.65100 points

167.2 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA SPADE / Porte Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


4

4

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA SIENTA

Level

Level

79.91100 points 4 5 5

5 54 42



Comfortability


Comfortability


166.8 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

82.94100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ - Advanced safety car

4 5 5

5 32

4

4166.5 points

Passengers CarsTOYOTA Vitz

Level

Level

82.05100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

80.50100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

3 4 5

4 3 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

79.09100 points

4

4

Level

Level

82.25100 points

165.3 points

Electric vehicles, etc.TOYOTA AQUA

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

5 5 5

5 35

Passengers CarsTOYOTA LAND CRUISER PRADO

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


*

* As the evaluation method for the pedestrian protection performance was changed, it was multiplied by the correction coefficient so that it would be equal to the collision safety performance evaluations for FY 2011 to 2015.

* This is the evaluation method until FY 2010. The evaluation was based on the total points of full frontal collision tests, offset frontal collision tests, and side collision tests.

25





5 5 5

5 44

Passengers CarsTOYOTA MARK X

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


*



Comfortability


Comfortability

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

5 5 5

5 5


Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat Driver’s seat Front passenger's seat

Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

4Level

Level

This model was


Passengers CarsTOYOTA PREMIO / ALLION

6Driver’s seat 6Front passenger's seat*

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

5 4 5

5 5

Driver’s seat Front passenger's seatFront passenger's seat


Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

5Level

Level

This model was


Passengers CarsTOYOTA ESTIMA Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER PHEV / OUTLANDER5 5 5

4 45 5

5

4

3


184.6 points

Level

Level

85.61100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.17100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.908 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


+ -

Car assessment



Five stars award

Passengers CarsMITSUBISHI MIRAGE

44 5 5

4 44 34163.4 points

Level

Level

84.62100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

78.80100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

0.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


5 5 5

5 34

Passengers CarsMITSUBISHI RVR

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

6Driver’s seat 6Front passenger's seat* Front

PassengerRearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


5 4

5

5

53

MITSUBISHI DELICA D:5Passengers Cars

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

26






5 5 5

5 44

Passengers CarsTOYOTA MARK X

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


*



Comfortability


Comfortability

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

5 5 5

5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

4Level

Level

This model was


Passengers CarsTOYOTA PREMIO / ALLION


FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

5 4 5

5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

5Level

Level

This model was


Passengers CarsTOYOTA ESTIMA Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER PHEV / OUTLANDER5 5 5

4 45 5

5

4

3


184.6 points

Level

Level

85.61100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.17100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.908 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


+ -

Car assessment



Five stars award

Passengers CarsMITSUBISHI MIRAGE

44 5 5

4 44 34163.4 points

Level

Level

84.62100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

78.80100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

0.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


5 5 5

5 34

Passengers CarsMITSUBISHI RVR

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


5 4

5

5

53

MITSUBISHI DELICA D:5Passengers Cars

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


27





4 5 5

5 5 5 5

4

4

4

Passengers CarsNISSAN TEANA

184.4 points

Level

Level

83.77100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

94.64100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars award

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 5 5

5 5 4 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

94.78100 points

3

5

Level

Level

67.82100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.NISSAN LEAF

179.4 points *

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability


Car assessment


Five stars award

4 5 5

4 4



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.70100 points

5 5

Passengers CarsNISSAN SERENA SUZUKI LANDY

4

5

1175.8 points *

Level

Level

75.06100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

0.808 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



Car assessment


Five stars award

5 5 5

5 4

4

4

Passengers CarsNISSAN ELGRAND

173.1 points

Level

Level

82.71100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.42100 points

0.008 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


Five stars award

5 5 5

5 3 5 5

5

4173.0 points

Passengers CarsNISSAN X-TRAIL

Level

Level

88.38100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

84.70100 points

0.008 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


Advanced safety car

44 5 5

4 45 24

Passengers CarsNISSAN SYLPHY

162.9 points

Level

Level

85.27100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

77.68100 points

0.008 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability


5 5 5

5 3 5 3

4

4162.3 points

Passengers CarsNISSAN NOTE

Level

Level

81.27100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

81.04100 points

0.008 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability









42

4

3 4 4

4 3 5 5

Mini-sized Cars

NISSAN DAYZ ROOX Highway STAR / DAYZ ROOXMITSUBISHI eK space custom / eK space

159.5 points

Level

Level

81.01100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

74.57100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


4 5 5

5 33

Passengers CarsNISSAN CUBE

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


4 4 5

5 35

Passengers CarsNISSAN JUKE

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

Rear center seat3 point seat belt6Driver’s seat 5Front passenger's seat

*

4 5

5

4

34

Passengers CarsNISSAN MARCH

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


54 5 5

5 55 45

4

Mini-sized CarsHonda N-BOX / N-BOX Custom

Level

Level

83.67100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

88.80100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability184.1 points*

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


5 5 5

4 5 5 5

5

4

2

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda VEZEL

183.7 points

Level

Level

86.75100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.03100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda GRACE

44 5 5

5 55 44

2181.0 points

Level

Level

84.70100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.32100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars award







42

4

3 4 4

4 3 5 5

Mini-sized Cars

NISSAN DAYZ ROOX Highway STAR / DAYZ ROOXMITSUBISHI eK space custom / eK space

159.5 points

Level

Level

81.01100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

74.57100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


4 5 5

5 33

Passengers CarsNISSAN CUBE

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


4 4 5

5 35

Passengers CarsNISSAN JUKE

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

Rear center seat3 point seat belt6Driver’s seat 5Front passenger's seat

*

4 5

5

4

34

Passengers CarsNISSAN MARCH

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


54 5 5

5 55 45

4

Mini-sized CarsHonda N-BOX / N-BOX Custom

Level

Level

83.67100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

88.80100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability184.1 points*

Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


5 5 5

4 5 5 5

5

4

2

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda VEZEL

183.7 points

Level

Level

86.75100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.03100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda GRACE

44 5 5

5 55 44

2181.0 points

Level

Level

84.70100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.32100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars award



31





2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 5 5

4 4 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

91.33100 points

4

5

Level

Level

77.21100 points

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda STEPWGN

180.9 points*

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability


Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Passengers Cars

3

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.008 points

Level

5 5 5

5 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.82100 points

4

3

Level

Level

69.49100 points

Honda CIVIC Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability


180.8 points*Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Electric vehicles, etc.Honda SHUTTLE

44 5 5

5 55 54

2

180.1 points

Level

Level

82.71100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

93.42100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability




3

5 5

5 4 5 5

4

4

5Electric vehicles, etc.

Honda ACCORD HYBRID

178.9 points

Level

Level

79.46100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

94.48100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars award

4

4

4

4 4 5

5 55 4

Mini-sized CarsHonda N-WGN / N-WGN Custom

178.8 points

Level

Level

85.50100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

87.35100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



5 4 5

5 4 5 5

4

4

2

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda JADE

178.2 points

Level

Level

82.50100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

91.70100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



5 4 5

5 5 5 5

4

4

2

Electric vehicles, etc.Honda FIT

178.0 points

Level

Level

81.41100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.59100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability




Five stars award







Honda FREED / FREED+4 5 5

5 4 5 52


177.2 points*



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.12100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4

5

Level

Level

72.73100 points

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



Car assessment


Five stars award

32 4 5

42

44 34

Mini-sized CarsHonda N-ONE

161.5 points

Level

Level

77.83100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

79.71100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability



2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

5 5 5

5 4



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

92.31100 points

4

4

Level

Level

83.35100 points

179.6 points

Electric vehicles, etc.LEXUS CT200h

SAFE

+ -



Comfortability


Comfortability



Five stars award

Passengers Cars

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 4 5

4 5 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

87.80100 points

4

5

Level

Level

78.87100 points

SUZUKI SWIFT

178.3 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability


Car assessment


Five stars award

Car assessment


Passengers Cars

2

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

4 3 5

4 3 5 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

75.19100 points

4

5

Level

Level

76.97100 points

SUZUKI IGNIS

164.6 points*



Comfortability


Comfortability



44 4 5

5 44 35

2

SUZUKI WAGON R / WAGON R STINGRAYMAZDA FLAIRMini-sized Cars

163.0 points*

Level

Level

73.42100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

75.76100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

Car assessment




Comfortability


Comfortability

43 5 5

5 54 34

Mini-sized CarsSUZUKI HUSTLER MAZDA FLAIR CROSSOVER

160.2 points

Level

Level

82.23100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

77.98100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

0.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment








Passengers Cars

SUZUKI SOLIO / SOLIO BANDITMITSUBISHI DELICA D:2 / DELICA D:2 CUSTOM

4

4

4 4

2 3

5

4 52

159.4 points

Level

Level

83.33100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

72.15100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability



43 4 4

4 44 34

2

Mini-sized CarsSUZUKI ALTO Lapin

158.4 points

Level

Level

83.56100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

70.92100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability



44 4 3

5 55 34

2

Mini-sized CarsSUZUKI ALTO MAZDA CAROL

158.2 points

Level

Level

84.16100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

70.13100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

34 3 5

4 54 35

2

SUZUKI SPACIA / SPACIA CustomMAZDA FLAIR WAGON / FLAIR WAGON Custom Style



Comfortability


Comfortability

Mini-sized Cars

157.6 points*

Level

Level

68.49100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

73.25100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level

Car assessment


43 3 4

3 43 34

－

Mini-sized Cars

SUZUKI EVERYMAZDA SCRUM

NISSAN NV100 CLIPPER RIO / NV100 CLIPPERMITSUBISHI TOWN BOX / MINICAB

148.0 points

Level

Level

79.90100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

68.10100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

0.008 points

Level



Comfortability



34

45 5

4 4 5

5 5

Passengers CarsVOLKSWAGEN Golf

176.7 points

Level

Level

80.89100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

90.82100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability




44 4 5

5 54 34

2

Mini-sized Cars

DAIHATSU CastTOYOTA PIXIS JOY

166.0 points*

Level

Level

75.81100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

75.67100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability









54 4 4

4 43 35

2

DAIHATSU Mira e:s SUBARU PLEO PLUSTOYOTA PIXIS EPOCHMini-sized Cars

165.7 points*

Level

Level

85.97100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

70.92100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


44 4 5

5 55 34

2

Mini-sized Cars

DAIHATSU MOVE CUSTOM / MOVESUBARU STELLA CUSTOM / STELLA

165.5 points

Level

Level

81.84100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

79.69100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


4 4 5

4 3 2 52

4

4

Mini-sized Cars

DAIHATSU Tanto CUSTOM / TantoSUBARU CHIFFON CUSTOM / CHIFFON

160.5 points

Level

Level

81.58100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

74.97100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


43 4 5

4 44 35

2

Mini-sized CarsDAIHATSU MOVE canbus

160.5 points*

Level

Level

73.56100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

73.11100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


32 4 5

5 53 35

4

Mini-sized CarsDAIHATSU WAKE TOYOTA PIXIS MEGA

159.2 points*

Level

Level

69.07100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

72.48100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level


1 3 5

4 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

2Level

Level

This model was


DAIHATSU HIJET CARGO / ATRAI WAGONSUBARU SAMBAR VAN / Dias WagonTOYOTA Pixis Van

Mini-sized Cars Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability



Comfortability


Comfortability

3

3 4 4

4 4

3

4157.9 points

Passengers CarsAudi A1

Level

Level

75.13100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

77.86100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.008 points

Level







54 4 4

4 43 35

2

DAIHATSU Mira e:s SUBARU PLEO PLUSTOYOTA PIXIS EPOCHMini-sized Cars

165.7 points*

Level

Level

85.97100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

70.92100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


44 4 5

5 55 34

2

Mini-sized Cars

DAIHATSU MOVE CUSTOM / MOVESUBARU STELLA CUSTOM / STELLA

165.5 points

Level

Level

81.84100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

79.69100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


4 4 5

4 3 2 52

4

4

Mini-sized Cars

DAIHATSU Tanto CUSTOM / TantoSUBARU CHIFFON CUSTOM / CHIFFON

160.5 points

Level

Level

81.58100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

74.97100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


43 4 5

4 44 35

2

Mini-sized CarsDAIHATSU MOVE canbus

160.5 points*

Level

Level

73.56100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

73.11100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


32 4 5

5 53 35

4

Mini-sized CarsDAIHATSU WAKE TOYOTA PIXIS MEGA

159.2 points*

Level

Level

69.07100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

72.48100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

6.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

Car assessment


FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level


1 3 5

4 5



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

2Level

Level

This model was


DAIHATSU HIJET CARGO / ATRAI WAGONSUBARU SAMBAR VAN / Dias WagonTOYOTA Pixis Van

Mini-sized Cars Front passenger seat sideDriver's seat side


Comfortability


Comfortability



Comfortability


Comfortability

3

3 4 4

4 4

3

4157.9 points

Passengers CarsAudi A1

Level

Level

75.13100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

77.86100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

5.008 points

Level



39





2

1 2 5

4 3

2

4138.6 points

FIAT 500 / 500CABARTH 595 / 595CPassengers Cars

Level

Level

64.96100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

69.68100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

4 4 5

52

TOYOTA Probox / Succeed　MAZDA FAMILIA VAN

5

Commercial Vehicles

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

4 4 5

54


Commercial VehiclesNISSAN NV200 VANETTE

Level

Level

Not tested forfolding seat.



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

Not tested for folding seat.

4 3 5

43


3

Commercial VehiclesNISSAN NV150 AD

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


3 4 5

12

5

Commercial VehiclesMAZDA BONGO VAN

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

40






2

1 2 5

4 3

2

4138.6 points

FIAT 500 / 500CABARTH 595 / 595CPassengers Cars

Level

Level

64.96100 points



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

69.68100 points

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

4.008 points

Level



Comfortability


Comfortability

4 4 5

52

TOYOTA Probox / Succeed　MAZDA FAMILIA VAN

5

Commercial Vehicles

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level



Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

4 4 5

54


Commercial VehiclesNISSAN NV200 VANETTE

Level

Level

Not tested forfolding seat.



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability

Not tested for folding seat.

4 3 5

43


3

Commercial VehiclesNISSAN NV150 AD

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


3 4 5

12

5

Commercial VehiclesMAZDA BONGO VAN

Level

Level



Level Level

Level LevelLevel

Level

Level

FrontPassenger

RearPassenger

Level

This model was




Comfortability


Comfortability


41

For the spread of safer cars and child seats

Safety performance assessments of generally sold cars and child seats are performed as a car assessment project in

order to spread safer cars and child seats.

The result of the safety performance assessment of your car and child seat can be known on the website.

The car assessment is implemented so that a person who drives a car can easily choose a car and so that a car

manufacturer can promote the development of safe cars.

http://www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/index.html

Rich video content User-friendly conditional searches Comprehensible inquiry corner

Provision of safety information based on car assessments

Various Brochures on Car Assessment

Rear visual field information Pedal misapplication

Tests for evaluating the safety of accident prevention technologies, including

the issuance of warnings or automatic application of the brakes by a car when it

is likely to crash, have been introduced since FY 2014, and the results have

been published as preventive safety performance evaluations.

In FY 2018, the evaluation of the advanced emergency braking system (with

night lamps against pedestrian), high-performance headlights, and pedal

stepping error preventing device was newly started.

The purpose of the preventive safety performance evaluation is to let many

users select safer cars so that traffic accidents are reduced. At the same time,

the evaluation results of cars are published for the purpose of prompting

automobile manufacturers to develop safer cars.

Brochure on preventive safety performance evaluation

Lane departure control High-performance headlights

Preventive safety performance AssessmentNew technologies to avoid crashes



Brake!

Choose a safer car2019.3

Advanced emergency braking system(with night lamps against pedestrian)

Advanced emergency braking system (against vehicle)

Advanced emergency braking system(against pedestrian)

42

Front collision tests and usability assessment tests have been conducted on

commercially available child-seats and their results have been published as safety

performance evaluations.

We hope you utilize this brochure to choose a safer child-seat for your precious

child.

Child-Seat Safety Comparison Booklet

Recently, cars equipped with an automatic collision notification system, which

automatically makes notification of the necessary information for emergency first

aid in case a serious traffic accident resulting in life-threatening injury occurs, are

being sold.

When a notification is automatically made by this system, the time from accident

occurrence to the start of medical treatment by a doctor can be shortened.

Therefore, the number of fatalities from traffic accidents can be possibly reduced.

The website of the National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid provides

a list of cars equipped with an automatic collision notification system.

Brochure for evaluation of functions of automatic accident notification system

How to obtain brochuresVarious brochures on car assessment are distributed for free at 50 branches nationwide of the National Agency for

Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid. It is also possible to browse all the brochures on the website of the National Agency

for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid. www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/


Technologies for preparing for the occurrence of severe accident

Evaluation of automatic accident notification system

Car assessment

Air bag deploymentinformation, etc.

Call centerAutomatic notification

(positional information, etc.)

Fire station

Ambulance

Flow of automatic accident notification

2019.3 Choose a safer car!

Platform

55km/h

Frontal collision test

Operation manual

Display on body

Structure of body

Easiness to makea person take seat

Mountability onto the car

1

2

3

4

5

Usability evaluation test

重大な事故が発生した場合に備える技術重大な事故が発生した場合に備える技術事故自動通報システム機能評価

自動車アセスメント

エアバッグ展開情報等コールセンター自動通報

（位置情報等）

消防署

救急車

事故自動通報の流れ

2019.3 より安全な車を選びましょう！

43

Choose a safer car

Collision safety performance assessmentTechnologies to protect people in crashes



2019.3

Car assessment


Five stars award

2019.3




www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/ JACAP Search




www.nasva.go.jp/mamoru/ JACAP

* All rights reserved.Editorial supervisor: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and TourismIssued by: ©National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid

Pronounced “Nas-Va,” NASVA is an abbreviation for “National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid.

Traffic accident victims’ hotline

Support activitiesfor accident victims

Support accident victims●Establishment/operation

of custodial care facilities●Provision of fees for care●Provision of loans for

development of children orphaned by traffic accidents

Protectingfrom car accidents

Provision of safetyinformation

●New Car Assessment Program

Preventingcar accidents

Safety instructionprograms

●Instruction training●Aptitude test●Safety management

What is the National Agency for Automotive Safety &Victims’ Aid (NASVA) ?The National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims’ Aid carries out the following functions in order to prevent caraccidents and support the victims of these accidents, promoting the concept of better motorization life.

We are an agency specializing in automotive safety and victim’s aid

The National Agency for Automotive Safety and Victim’s Aid(NASVA) is the main body that implements national projects funded by gains on management of premiums for compulsory automobile liability insurance and mutual-aid programs.NASVA performs the three integrated functions of supporting accident victims, preventing car accidents, and protecting people from car accidents.

choose a safer car collision safety performance assessment technologies to protect people in crashes...

Documents