ПОНЯТИЕ, СОДЕРЖАНИЕ И МЕСТО КАТЕГОРИИ «ДОБРОСОВЕСТНОСТЬ» В СИСТЕМЕ ПРАВОВЫХ ПОНЯТИЙ ГРАЖДАНСКОГО ПРАВА

Download ПОНЯТИЕ, СОДЕРЖАНИЕ И МЕСТО КАТЕГОРИИ «ДОБРОСОВЕСТНОСТЬ» В СИСТЕМЕ ПРАВОВЫХ ПОНЯТИЙ ГРАЖДАНСКОГО ПРАВА

Post on 05-Apr-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents

1 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li><p> 5'2011 </p><p> 46 </p><p>4. , , </p><p>4.1. , </p><p> .., ..., - : grig.verdi@mail.ru . , - , - . , , , -. : , -, , , - , , , , - </p><p>CONCEPT, THE MAINTENANCE AND PLACE OF THE CATEGORY </p><p>"CONSCIENTIOUSNESS" OF SYSTEM OF LEGAL CONCEPTS </p><p>OF CIVIL LAW Verdijan G.V., the candidate of jurisprudence, the senior lecturer of the Russian legal academy of Ministry of justice of Russia Annotation: The popular belief that "conscientiousness" is uncertain, inconcrete concept. Such concepts often meet in norms of civil law, and them already traditionally rank as the estimated concepts which distinctive feature is absence of their accurate legislative definition that forces theorists and experts to estimate them independently. Keywords: conscientiousness, a rationality, justice, a right principle, civil law, morals, morals, truth, honesty - -</p><p> , , , - , , -, . , - , - , - , - -, , - , , - , </p><p>1. , , . , -</p><p> , - , - , . , , - . , - , , - , 2. - , -, , - , , . . , - . . . , - , - 3. </p><p> ( ), - , . , - .. , -, , . - - , , , - 4. , </p><p> , .. - , - .5 -, . . 302 : , , .6 .. , </p><p> , , -, , .7 </p><p> 1 .: . . // . 1976. 1. . 29. 2 .: . . - - // : . . 2. .: , 2002. . 401. 3 . . . .-, .: , 2001. . 95. 4 .: . . . : , 1976. . 138. 5 .: . . : .... ... , 2001. . 121. </p><p>6 , , , - . 7 . . . . 96-105. </p></li><li><p> .. - </p><p> 47 </p><p> , , , - ( . ..). , . - -, .. 8. -</p><p> , , - . - - . - - - , , - 9, , , -10. , ", , "11, .. - , , 12. - , - - . .. , -</p><p> , - , . - , , - - . , , - , , - , . : ( )13, , - , . -, , . , , -</p><p> , , , - . , .. , </p><p> 8 . . - // -- . 2001. 2. . 93. .: . . . . : 80 . .: -, 1999. . 741. .: . . . , .-., .: - .., 1906. . 60. 10 .: : 3 . .. -. .: . 2003, . 229. 11 .: . . . . 18-. .: , 1986. . 145.; / . . . . . 4- -. .: , . 1. -. 1999. . 410. 12 . . . 4- . .1. -3. .: . ., 1989. . 445. 13 . . . . 131. </p><p> , 14. .. , , . , , , , -15. , . . , -</p><p> , - 16. .. -, -- -, , - , - . , . . , , , - -17. , .. , , - , : . </p><p> -. .. , -, , , 18. .. -, , - , , - 19. , -</p><p> -, , , - . , - , , - . . , , , , , -, , - 20. </p><p> , . , </p><p> 14 . . - / . . . . , . . , . . . .: , 1996. . 28. . . - . .: - , 1955. . 95. . . . . 1., . : 1917. . 87. 17 . . // . 1941. 2. . 47. 18 .. . .2-, . - .: , 2001. . 209. 19 : . . I. . 3-. / . . . , . . . .: , 1999. . 265. 20 . - // -. 1927. 45. . 1402. </p></li><li><p> 5'2011 </p><p> 48 </p><p> , , , - , , -. - -. , -, , , -, , - , .. - 21. , .. -</p><p> , . - , - , , , . -, , - -, . - - , , . , , . , </p><p> - - ? , - . , , , - . .. , </p><p>, , - 22. , - - ? , - , .. . .. - - , -23, , . - , , , - 24. , -, , - . , -</p><p> , -</p><p> 21 .: . . -. . 262. 22 .: .. ( ). .: - , 1891. . 84. 23 .: .. . . I. -- . .: , 2000. . 74. 24 .: .. : . .: -, 1994. . 89. </p><p> .25 . 26. , . , : (traditio) ? , , 27. -28. , , 29. -</p><p> . - . (usucapi), 30. , ( ) , - . : (longi temporis praescriptio), . - 531 . , - , . , - , . , - .. , - , , , - -, - 31. , -</p><p> II . .. , . -, : </p><p> 25 .: . . (-</p><p> ) // . . 13. , 1970. . 125 26 .: . . . . 103 27 .: . . . 5. . 68. 28 .: . . . . 135. 29 .: / . . . . ., . 1. .: - . . , 1874. 177. 30 , - XII (.: . . . . . 5 ., . 4-,. . 28), , (.: . - . . 174). .: .. . .: - . . 1891. . 336. .: .. . . : , 1995. . 49. 31 .: .JI. -. : - ., 1872. . 17. </p></li><li><p> .. - </p><p> 49 </p><p> . : - . , - , - , 32. - : res habilis, titulus, fides, possessio, tempus33. - - 34. - , . , . . - - . , -, , . : - - , . , - , .. , - . titulus putativus ( )35 , . -, .. - 36. -</p><p> -, , , . -, .. , - . .. , , : , -, - , - , . - , . , .. , -, 37. , , -</p><p> 32 (, ), , . - () (.: . . . . 103). 33 .: .. . . I. : - , 1919. . 52. 34 .: . . ..., .2. .: - B.C. , 1894. . 78. 35 .: .. - (. . 1-2) // . 2002. 1(9). . 266. 36 .: .. / . .. , .: .., 1901. . 130. 37 .: .. . . 59. </p><p>, - . -</p><p> . , (mala fides) - 38. - - . , </p><p> -. , . , , , . , - , , , - , , - -39. , - . , , 40. - - - . -</p><p> . . - -, 41. , . -</p><p> , , . , , , . . , - . , , (casus). , , - -42. , </p><p> , -</p><p> 38 .: . . . . 94. 39 .: . . . . . 415. 40 .: . X. : . . 85. .: .. // . 1941. 2. . 38. 42 .: . . . 77. , - - (.: - : XII. . . . 293). </p></li><li><p> 5'2011 </p><p> 50 </p><p> . , - . - , - ( , ), -, , -, , - . , - , -, , , .., , , - . , -</p><p> - ? (). - , - , . , , , - - . - . , .. , -</p><p> , . , , - , , . , , , . . . , - , - - 43. .. , - , . . , - , , .. . , . , - - - . -</p><p> . -, </p><p>(, , , ) . - - , -, . , . </p><p> 43 .: JI.. . . . 113. </p><p>-, , - - , - , - (. . 1538, 1539 - ). - , , - (. 86 ). -, ( ) </p><p> . . , - , - . XX . , -, . -, , . </p><p> : 1. . . </p><p> // . 1941. 2. . 47. 2. . . . 77. 3. / . . . </p><p>. ., . 1. .: - . . -, 1874. 177. </p><p>4. . -. - / . . . . -, . . , . . . .: , 1996. . 28. </p><p>5. : . . I. . 3-. / . . . , . . . .: , 1999. . 265. </p><p>6. .. . .2-, .- .: , 2001. . 209. </p><p>7. . . -. 4- . .1. -3. .: . ., 1989. . 445. </p><p>8. . . . . 94. 9. . . ..., .2. </p><p>.: - B.C. , 1894. . 78. 10. .. . . I. </p><p>- . .: , 2000. . 74. 11. .. . . I. : </p><p>- , 1919. . 52. 12. .. ( ). </p><p>.: - , 1891. . 84. 13. .JI. </p><p>. : - ., 1872. . 17. 14. .. . .: -</p><p> . . 1891. . 336. 15. . . . : </p><p> , 1976. . 138. 16. . . (-</p><p> ) // -. . 13. , 1970. . 125 </p><p>17. .. // . 1976. 1. . 29. </p><p>18. : 3 . .. -. .: . 2003, . 229. </p><p>19. .. : .... ... , 2001. . 121. </p><p>20. .. - - // : . . 2. .: , 2002. . 401. </p><p>21. . . . . 103 </p></li><li><p> .. - </p><p> 51 </p><p>22. . . . -, .-., .: - .. , 1906. . 60. </p><p>23. .. . .-, .: , 2001. . 95. </p><p>24. .. - . . 59. </p><p>25. .. - (. . 1-2) // . 2002. 1(9). . 266. </p><p>26. . . . . 1., . : 1917. . 87. </p><p>27. . // - . 1927. 45. . 1402. </p><p>28. . . - - . .: - , 1955. . 95. </p><p> References: 1. Amfiteatrov G.N. Voprosy's vindication in the Soviet right//the </p><p>Soviet state and the right. 1941. 2. With. 47. 2. Baron Ju. system of the Roman civil law. With. 77. 3. Vindshteyd The Textbook the rights / the Lane </p><p>under the editorship of S. V.Pahmana., . 1. SPb.: Izd - in A.Gieroglifa and I.Nikiforova, 1874. 177. </p><p>4. The civil code of the Russian Federation. A part the first. The Scientifically-practical comment / Otv. . T.E.Abova, A.Ju.Kabalkin, V.P.Mozolin. : , 1996. With. 28. </p><p>5. Civil law: the Textbook. I. . 3. / Under the editorship of A.P. of Sergeeva, thick. : the Prospectus, 1999. With. 265. </p><p>6. Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie and protection of the civil rights. .2-, a stereotype. - : the Statute, 2001. With. 209. </p><p>7. V.I.Tolkovyj slovar's distance of live great Russian language. In 4 . .1. -3. : . A language, 1989. With. 445. </p><p>8. Dernburg G.Pandekty. The real right. With. 94. 9. Dogma of the Roman right. Lectures of prof. V.V.Yefimov., </p><p>.2. SPb.: Type Th B.C. , 1894. With. 78. 10. Dozdev D.V.practical course of the Roman right. I. The </p><p>Uchebno-practical grant. : Business, 2000. With. 74. 11. Domandjo V.P.Istorija of the Roman right. . I. Irkutsk: </p><p>Type Th of the Transbaikalian railway, 1919. With. 52. 12. Dorn L.B.dogma of the Roman right (an especial part). </p><p>SPb.: - Muller and Bogelman, 1891. With. 84. 13. Duyvernua .JI. Value of the Roman right for Russian </p><p>lawyers. Yaroslavl: G.Falk's Type-fija, 1872. With. 17. 14. Yefimov V.V.Lektsii of history of the Roman right. SPb.: </p><p>V.S.Balashova's printing house 1891. With. 336. 15. Zherebkin V. E. The logic analysis of concepts of the right. </p><p>Kiev: school, 1976. With. 138. 16. Ioffe O. S. From history thoughts </p><p>( the doctrine feodaliz) //the Collection of scientific works. . 13. Sverdlovsk, 1970. With. 125 </p><p>17. Kashanina T.V. estimated of concept of the Soviet right//Jurisprudence. 1976. 1. With. 29. </p><p>18. The short Russian encyclopedia: In 3 . .. -. : the Big Russian encyclopedia. 2003, with. 229. </p><p>19. Kuznetsova O.A. Presumptions in the Russian civil law: .... ... Ekaterinburg, 2001. With. 121. </p><p>20. Medovshikova E.O. interpretation of the grazhdansko-right contract // Tsivilistichesky for-piski: the Interuniversity collection of proceedings. . 2. : the Statute, 2002. With. 401. </p><p>21. Mitukov K.A.Sistema of the Roman civil law. With. 103 The general theory of the right. V.N.Hvostova's elementary </p><p>sketch, Izd. -., : Publishing house N.P. , 1906. With. 60. </p><p>22. Ozhegov S. I and Shvedova N. Ju. Russian Explanatory dictionary: 80 Open Companies of words and phraseological expressions. : , 1999. With. 741. </p><p>23. Pokrovsk I.A.core of a civil law problem. . -, : the statute, 2001. With. 95. </p><p>24. Popovich L.V.justification of prescription and prescription of possession in ancient Roman civil law. With. 59. </p><p>25. Rudokvas A.D.Roman lawyers about possession and the property (Digesty. II. 1-2)//the Ancient right. 2002. 1 (9). With. 266. </p><p>26. Sinai Century And. Russian civil law. . 1., the General part. Kiev: Progress 1917. With. 87. </p><p>27. Tadevosjan V. Otvetstvennost and the rights of the diligent purchaser before the proprietor//the Weekly journal of the Soviet justice. 1927. 45. With. 1402. </p><p> .. , -</p><p> .. </p><p> . </p><p> , - , , , . , , - . , </p><p>, -, , . - , , , , , .. , . . . , </p><p> , - . -</p><p> .. . </p><p> , - , ... .. </p></li></ul>

Recommended

View more >