ncctlj@sina.com

711,7.6725,20

610-20618-286 713,10.8

,

[]

[]

625,,334

50

2005.05.15,16:40,,

40:

:-

----------

610-20618-286 720-25, ? ? ?

:

1 1996-1998 1999-20017 200172004 200472007???

2001 42 0.5%-1%2002 570 18%-20%2003 1642 40%-50%2004 2576 70%-90%2005

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ()2010

04 05 0607

(04)

04

(053)

123

621

Hyman Bass385

1-3 5-8 20-50-100

20070917 14 60 400 7

[1] 1415 NCTM2007 90

Dr. Zhonghe Wu, National University Dr. Shuhua AnLong Beach, California State University. Dr. Gerald Kulm, Texas A&M University

Chart1

0.8787142860.3504285710.688

0.9126666670.2370.589333333

0.82950.2341666670.484166667

0.6058888890.4280.569

0.8183555560.2858444440.580333333

0.9340.369750.69225

0.9250.59350.73305

Sheet1

0.85270.875

0.74080.6857

0.87260.741

0.92010.9402

0.85650.7552

0.82040.8055

0.63730.6131

Sheet1

0.85270.875

0.74080.6857

0.87260.741

0.92010.9402

0.85650.7552

0.82040.8055

0.63730.6131

Sheet2

School# stu.Q 1AQ 2C3QCQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ 7DQ 8DQ 9CQ 10CQ11 48%Q12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q14 "55"Q15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"Q16B "B with explanation"Q16B "B without explanation"Q16C "150 with work show"Q16C "150 without work show"Q17A "27.1"Q17 EQ18A correctQ18B correctQ18C correctQ19A correctQ19B correctQ20AcorrectQ20AincorrecQ20 AcorrecQ20B corretQ16B "B with explanation"Q16B "B without explanation"16BQ16C "150 with work show"Q16C "150 without work show"16CQ17AQ17B

Unreformed171891.4%98.0%93.7%94.1%82.6%91.7%97.3%88.0%96.9%97.3%95.6%87.3%96.0%71.1%95.6%95.6%65.8%82.1%3.7%57.8%3.8%92.6%93.1%65.7%56.2%35.9%61.8%64.4%55.1%26.1%82.1%3.7%56.0%57.8%3.8%61.6%Unreformed92.6%93.1%

Reformed163486.5%94.7%91.2%90.0%79.7%86.0%95.8%85.7%95.8%96.3%92.3%75.6%93.3%65.5%94.0%88.9%64.9%85.5%2.5%64.5%2.6%92.5%92.5%87.7%92.1%53.4%76.9%75.8%58.8%35.6%85.5%2.5%57.8%64.5%2.6%67.1%Reformed92.5%92.5%

Inter. Average26.0%39.9%63.7%48.3%31.7%39.4%39.6%35.6%26.6%46.1%8.9%24.0%22.4%31.0%35.8%18.3%5.8%21.4%32.4%6.2%2.3%21.4%32.4%25.1%6.2%2.3%8.5%Inter. Average74.9%43.8%

CHinese Taipei49.5%74.0%76.3%73.7%39.7%41.0%73.9%53.5%76.2%69.8%37.0%61.8%56.6%38.6%59.1%39.1%17.6%26.6%47.9%20.0%1.0%26.6%47.9%33.7%20.0%1.0%21.0%Austria84.1%45.0%

Hong Kong43.3%67.4%80.8%80.7%61.0%47.2%81.6%46.6%73.2%58.7%30.3%71.8%55.9%38.9%75.6%47.2%15.5%7.8%55.5%21.4%5.0%7.8%55.5%23.7%21.4%5.0%26.4%Finland85.6%51.4%

Japan38.4%68.2%82.0%51.0%38.7%43.5%72.6%49.7%79.3%64.4%15.9%66.8%37.4%46.1%58.9%33.0%18.7%49.2%32.2%19.5%4.1%49.2%32.2%43.5%19.5%4.1%23.6%Hong Kang77.9%68.7%

Korea, S.42.7%78.5%78.4%53.1%44.6%41.0%75.1%56.3%75.2%70.3%36.5%57.2%64.0%51.1%43.1%27.2%15.3%39.6%42.4%22.3%2.6%39.6%42.4%40.5%22.3%2.6%24.9%France89.5%47.7%

Singapore55.7%57.9%81.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%82.1%56.2%63.8%48.9%56.8%60.3%58.4%49.5%77.6%52.2%27.4%39.6%44.4%27.6%1.1%39.6%44.4%41.2%27.6%1.1%28.7%Japan63.0%53.6%

USA24.8%48.2%74.0%48.3%35.3%33.4%38.6%50.9%48.6%33.7%12.0%20.4%20.2%44.9%54.8%24.0%7.7%36.6%31.6%8.0%2.8%36.6%31.6%34.9%8.0%2.8%10.8%Korea63.0%53.3%

USA40.8%42.3%

SchoolQ 2CQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ 7DQ12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q17AQ17B

Unreformed98.0%94.1%82.6%91.7%97.3%87.3%96.0%92.4%92.6%93.1%

Reformed94.7%90.0%79.7%86.0%95.8%75.6%93.3%87.9%92.5%92.5%

Inter. Average39.9%48.3%31.7%39.4%39.6%24.0%22.4%35.0%74.9%43.8%

CHinese Taipei74.0%73.7%39.7%41.0%73.9%61.8%56.6%60.1%84.1%45.0%

Hong Kong67.4%80.7%61.0%47.2%81.6%71.8%55.9%66.5%85.6%51.4%

Japan68.2%51.0%38.7%43.5%72.6%66.8%37.4%54.0%77.9%68.7%

Korea, S.78.5%53.1%44.6%41.0%75.1%57.2%64.0%59.1%89.5%47.7%

Singapore57.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%82.1%60.3%58.4%68.8%63.0%53.6%

USA48.2%48.3%35.3%33.4%38.6%20.4%20.2%34.9%63.0%53.3%

40.8%42.3%

Q 8DQ 9CQ11 48%

Unreformed88.0%96.9%95.6%93.50%

Reformed85.7%95.8%92.3%91.27%

Inter. Average35.6%26.6%8.9%23.70%

CHinese Taipei53.5%76.2%37.0%55.57%

Hong Kong46.6%73.2%30.3%50.03%

Japan49.7%79.3%15.9%48.30%

Korea, S.56.3%75.2%36.5%56.00%

Singapore56.2%63.8%56.8%58.93%

USA50.9%48.6%12.0%37.17%

Q 1AQ 10CQ15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"16C

Unreformed91.4%97.3%95.6%95.6%65.8%61.60%84.55%

Reformed86.5%96.3%94.0%88.9%64.9%67.10%82.95%

Inter. Average26.0%46.1%35.8%18.3%5.8%8.50%23.42%

CHinese Taipei49.5%69.8%59.1%39.1%17.6%21.00%42.68%

Hong Kong43.3%58.7%75.6%47.2%15.5%26.40%44.45%

Japan38.4%64.4%58.9%33.0%18.7%23.60%39.50%

Korea, S.42.7%70.3%43.1%27.2%15.3%24.90%37.25%

Singapore55.7%48.9%77.6%52.2%27.4%28.70%48.42%

USA24.8%33.7%54.8%24.0%7.7%10.80%25.97%

3QCQ14 "55"16B

Unreformed93.7%71.1%57.8%74.21%

Reformed91.2%65.5%25.1%60.59%

Inter. Average63.7%31.0%33.7%42.80%

CHinese Taipei76.3%38.6%23.7%46.20%

Hong Kong80.8%38.9%43.5%54.41%

Japan82.0%46.1%40.5%56.21%

Korea, S.78.4%51.1%41.2%56.90%

Singapore81.9%49.5%34.9%55.44%

USA74.0%44.9%36.6%51.83%

Q 1AQ 2C3QCQ 4AQ 5CQ 6CQ11 48%Q12 7x + 4y = 43 and 11x + 12y = 79Q13 "11"Q14 "55"Q15A "64kph"Q15B "80kph"Q16A "140 and 375"16B16C

Unreformed91.4%98.0%93.7%94.1%82.6%91.7%95.6%87.3%96.0%71.1%95.6%95.6%65.8%56.0%61.60%85.07%

Reformed86.5%94.7%91.2%90.0%79.7%86.0%92.3%75.6%93.3%65.5%94.0%88.9%64.9%57.8%67.10%81.84%

Inter. Average26.0%39.9%63.7%48.3%31.7%39.4%8.9%24.0%22.4%31.0%35.8%18.3%5.8%25.1%8.50%28.58%

CHinese Taipei49.5%74.0%76.3%73.7%39.7%41.0%37.0%61.8%56.6%38.6%59.1%39.1%17.6%33.7%21.00%47.91%

Hong Kong43.3%67.4%80.8%80.7%61.0%47.2%30.3%71.8%55.9%38.9%75.6%47.2%15.5%23.7%26.40%51.05%

Japan38.4%68.2%82.0%51.0%38.7%43.5%15.9%66.8%37.4%46.1%58.9%33.0%18.7%43.5%23.60%44.38%

Korea, S.42.7%78.5%78.4%53.1%44.6%41.0%36.5%57.2%64.0%51.1%43.1%27.2%15.3%40.5%24.90%46.54%

Singapore55.7%57.9%81.9%84.9%70.2%67.8%56.8%60.3%58.4%49.5%77.6%52.2%27.4%41.2%28.70%58.03%

USA24.8%48.2%74.0%48.3%35.3%33.4%12.0%20.4%20.2%44.9%54.8%24.0%7.7%34.9%10.80%32.92%

Q 7DQ 8DQ 9CQ 10C

Unreformed97.3%88.0%96.9%97.3%94.88%

Reformed95.8%85.7%95.8%96.3%93.40%

Inter. Average39.6%35.6%26.6%46.1%36.98%

CHinese Taipei73.9%53.5%76.2%69.8%68.35%

Hong Kong81.6%46.6%73.2%58.7%65.03%

Japan72.6%49.7%79.3%64.4%66.50%

Korea, S.75.1%56.3%75.2%70.3%69.23%

Singapore82.1%56.2%63.8%48.9%62.75%

USA38.6%50.9%48.6%33.7%42.95%

Q17AQ17B

Unreformed92.6%93.1%92.9%

Reformed92.5%92.5%92.5%

Inter. Average74.9%43.8%59.4%

Austria84.1%45.0%64.5%

Finland85.6%51.4%68.5%

Hong Kang77.9%68.7%73.3%

France89.5%47.7%68.6%

Japan63.0%53.6%58.3%

Korea63.0%53.3%58.2%

USA40.8%42.3%41.6%

School

Unreformed92.43%93.50%84.55%74.21%85.07%94.88%92.85%Unreformed

Reformed87.87%91.27%82.95%60.59%81.84%93.40%92.50%Reformed

Inter. Average35.04%23.70%23.42%42.80%28.58%36.98%59.35%Inter. Average

CHinese Taipei60.10%55.57%42.68%46.20%47.91%68.35%64.54%Austria

Hong Kong66.51%50.03%44.45%54.41%51.05%65.03%68.47%Finland

Japan54.03%48.30%39.50%56.21%44.38%66.50%73.31%Hong Kang

Korea, S.59.07%56.00%37.25%56.90%46.54%69.23%68.60%France

Singapore68.80%58.93%48.42%55.44%58.03%62.75%58.30%Japan

USA34.91%37.17%25.97%51.83%32.92%42.95%58.15%Korea

41.55%USA

Unreformed0.92428571430.9350.84550.74211111110.85071111110.948750.9285

Reformed0.87871428570.91266666670.82950.60588888890.81835555560.9340.925

Inter. Average0.35042857140.2370.23416666670.4280.28584444440.369750.5935

0.6880.58933333330.48416666670.5690.58033333330.692250.73305

0.90150.92383333330.83750.6740.83453333330.9413750.92675

0.35042857140.2370.23416666670.4280.28584444440.369750.5935

0.6880.58933333330.48416666670.5690.58033333330.692250.73305

0.8787142860.9126666670.82950.6058888890.8183555560.9340.925

0.3504285710.2370.2341666670.4280.2858444440.369750.5935

0.6880.5893333330.4841666670.5690.5803333330.692250.73305

Sheet2

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

0000

Unreformed

Reformed

Inter. Average

Sheet3

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

(Cai, 2000,2001)

[2]2005~2008

2005()

1

2

3 4

5 6

90%

50023

[]

----

[] 4375

62073580012001235600

4375115348845692415

21

[]

,,

Sara Bongiorni

20043925DVD 200511

2006

iPod

1,51,81,0.075

200412

1996-1998 1999-20017 200172004 200472007

,

20050909

20060907

20070614

200803

20060605

20070831:

519,528,

,,,

, ,:,:--;--;--,:?--:,,

--- !

010-66096172

Sara Bongiorni and her family attempted to live without goods made in China for a year, and found that it was no simple task. She has documented the project in a book called, A Year Without 'Made in China.It wasn't motivated by a patriotic urge to buy American, but more as an experiment to see how global the sources of our goods are. Bongiorni said, "I wanted our story to be a friendly, nonjudgmental look at the ways ordinary people are connected to the global economy." In the foreword, written by economist Joel Naroff, it's said that 15 percent of the $1.7 trillion spent on imported goods the US imported in 2006 came from China. This book would certainly be worth a read if you're at all interested in buying more local products. The same problems involved with not buying Chinese goods would apply to purchasing local goods. Purchasing a pair of shoes made in your own country is likely to reduce your footrpint, so to speak - transporting goods half way around the world is not green, even if it is cheaper