© 2014 hdr architecture, inc., all rights reserved.© 2016 ... · comparison to recent submittals...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.© 2016 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
© 2016 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
5-Year Cycle Verification with NFIP CRS
ASFPM Annual Conference 2018
June 21, 2018
City of Phoenix
© 2018 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
HASAN MUSHTAQ, PhD, PE, CFM
CITY OF PHOENIX
MARK FOUNTAIN, PE, CFM, ENV SPBLACK & VEATCH
MATT HANN,PE, CFM
HDR ENGINEERING
PRESENTERS
Located in Maricopa County
5th Most Populated City
Largest City in Arizona
o 518 square miles
1,626,078 People as of 2017
ABOUT PHOENIX?
Comprehensive Records Review
Identification of Data Gaps
Preparation of Supporting Materials
Evaluation for Level of Effort and Criteria
Recommendations for Future Actions
Records and Data Management
Improvements
Seek to Improve CRS Class
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Comprehensive Activity Reviews
o Recognition of Additional Points
o Prioritization of Data Gaps
o Activity Initiation and Discontinuation Recommendations
o Team Micro-Workshops
Time Savings Recommendations
Reviewed based on FIA-15/2013 CRS Coordinators Manual (Exp. 12/31/2016)
EARLY INDEPENDENT REVIEW
City Notified Jan 2017
ISO Review Date
o April 2017
Initial review and development
o Planned for 3 Months
ISO Follow-up and Closeout
o Anticipated as 6 to 8 Months
SCHEDULE AND PLANNING
1991 - CRS Class 8
1993 - CRS Class 7
2001 - CRS Class 6
November 30, 2015
4,977 policies
$675,011 discount
CRS Class 6 maintained
2018 – CRS Class 5
(Pending)
4,724 policies
$855,754 discount
CITY OF PHOENIX CRS HISTORY
Since 1991, the city has reduced its CRS
Class by implementing floodplain
management activities, resulting in increased
insurance premium savings for residents.
Initial data transfer from the City of Phoenix
o 2013 Verification Visit Report
o 2014, 2015, 2016 recertification packages
o Floodplain Management Plan 2016
Digital information (Emails/webpages)
Elevation Certificates
o More than 3,000 Files Provided
o Individual Review for Accuracy
DATA REVIEW
Partner Agency Data
o Flood Control District of Maricopa County
o Neighboring Municipalities
o Arizona Department of Water Resources
DATA REVIEW
Developed Preliminary Score with Original Data Provided
Opportunities and Challenges Identified
Presented in a Team Micro-Workshop to City
Provided a Benchmark for an Additional Data Request
o Objective: Increase Points
Data Reference Tracking Notes
PRELIMINARY SCORING ASSESSMENT
Consultant Team Status Report
o Preliminary Scoring Assessment
o Activity Initiation and Discontinuation Recommendations
City Actions and Opportunities
Feedback for Additional Data Collection and Development
INTERNAL MICRO-WORKSHOP
Elevation Certificates
Inventory of Flood Related Brochures
Updates to City’s Floodplain Management
webpage
Coordination with Flood Control District of
Maricopa County
SECONDARY DATA REVIEW
Collection of Partner Agency Materials
o ADMS/ADMP
o ALERT System
o Maricopa Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation
Plan (2017)
Scanning of Historic FIRM Panels
SECONDARY DATA REVIEW
Development of Supplemental Material
o Open Space Preservation Maps
o Structures within Floodplain
o Google Earth Data of Drainage Infrastructure
o CORS Map for Benchmark Location Support
o Real Estate Flood Hazard Disclosure
o Repetitive Loss Areas GIS Location Maps,
Overview Map, and Outreach Letter
SECONDARY DATA REVIEW
Consultant Overview and Presentation
Interactive Activity Reviews
o Structured Data Folders
o Activity Note Sheets
o Score Sheet Walk Through
Supplemental Data Collection
ISO REVIEW WORKSHOP
Development of Action Items
o City and Consultant Team
Review of Recommendations
o Activity 410, 530, 620
o Activity 330, 420, 540
Comparison to Recent Submittals
Reviewed based on FIA-15/2017 Draft
CRS Coordinators Manual (Exp. 12/31/2020)
ISO REVIEW WORKSHOP
Cooperative Dialogue between CRS Reviewers + City + Consultant Team
Internal and External Team Correspondence
Supplemental Data and Clarifications
CORRESPONDENCE WITH CRS
Plan
o Initial Development
o ISO Review Date
o Comment Resolution and ISO Follow-up
o Close-out
Actual
o Natural Disasters
o Other Delays
SCHEDULE CONSIDERATIONS
Public Outreach and Notifications
Next Steps - Internal Communications
o CRS Fact Sheet
o Website
o Mailers
o Brochures
o Social Media
PENDING CLASS CHANGE
Additional Flood Insurance Policy Savings
o Projected Savings of $290 per policy per year
for Policies within SFHA
o Projected Net Savings over Life of 30-year
Loan Approximately $5M to Residents*
Offset to Project Policy Increases
Continued Improvements to Floodplain
Management
Increased Local Awareness
Strengthening Agency Partnerships
*Based on Current Number of Policies and Escalating Cost of Policies
BENEFITS OF CLASS CHANGE
Public Outreach
Press Release
Data Management Improvements
o Proactive Record Collections
Enhancing Drainage Maintenance Program
Contract Documentation Clarification
Familiarity with CRS Program
NEXT STEPS
Future Data Management
o Elevation Certificates
o Building Permits
o Cross Departmental Records
o GIS Data
o Outreach Activities
o Floodplain Management Plan
Program for Public Information (PPI)
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
HASAN MUSHTAQ, PhD, PE, CFM
CITY OF [email protected]
602-262-4026
MARK FOUNTAIN, PE, CFM, ENV SPBLACK & [email protected]
602-309-9848
MATT HANN,PE, CFM
602-778-7309
QUESTIONS AND CONTACTS